ML14071A073

Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562

ML14071A073
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A073 (38)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of$,+

Status: Y[] NO] U9 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 01R36A511 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KVSWITCHGEAR iL SURGE ARRESTOR Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0056C Manufacturer, Model. Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO URl N/AO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UC0 N/AQl oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U0. N/AC

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U0 N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO U1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 392 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofX4 Status: YE] N[-] UZ Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 0IR36At511 Equip. Class' 3 Equipment Description 4.16KVSWITCHGEAR IL SURGE ARRESTOR Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NCI U(: N/A[:

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ No UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[ NO UJO N/AO

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO U1) of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NE UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

IPEEE noted a potential interactionfrom a nearby rollingcabinet, It is also noted that the cabinethas since been moved as of 11/28/95, which was also confirmed duringour walkdown. Therefore, this is no longer a spacialinteractionconcern.

At w -44 f-o h-* _ ti, wt't*lf)

,*l WI*-h" qzK o",

Evaluated by: LlkCA."

L qUWi1 Date: 12 Ace:

44 f 4 ""1N Page 393 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-I Page 394 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

- 7- a~k Page 395 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofW*4 Status: YZ N[:] ur Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR41LOO1B Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANEL 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139. Room, Area 3 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but' recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YI NEI

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YX NO UO N/AO3

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y5* NO3 UO3 N/AO oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO U[O- N/AQ"

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yo NO'] UO N/AO-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of SNOI UO3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 396 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of ,Y Status: Y Nq U'-E Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR41LOOIB Equip.

Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBUTION F1ANEL 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y1 NO UD N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[lNE UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý NO UM N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YýND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND U" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? -

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Aircq c &lb '~ IS euI(?h;+ 4-f Q474ý31RGCZA (ret-OA)

Date: ,4 5/ c21-Eautby 17XO4 LpyLtA&~\

9/1LOIL-/

" I U

Page 397 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 398 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 399 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fj, r Sheeti ofAL4 Status: YEI NEI UE Seismic Walldown Checklist (SWC)

Ev,:,mentIDNo, OIR4280'B Equip. C Equipment Description 125VDC BUS 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area QaL Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE6NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO NIAO

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO U~n N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y~i'NO UO N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U& N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YDNOAD'I potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 400 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

/

Sheet 2 ofX L%

Status: YE) NO 69 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ]D No. 01R428 01 Equip. Class'

-Equipxuewt DWsriflo 125 VDC BUS lB Inte7Areon Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yf NO U0 N/AD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y66 ND LTC N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y1 N[I UD N/A[D

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y&(ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions 1 I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YEI NDI UDJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

CNvf\

• Q \ A 0Qt Qa -kV" -- Z \ C- ,

Z' O \.) Q~ C . ~C r10ikO QQ k r) ONJQ Q Q\S Oyy)\\

V Z~jýrV W'k95 GL \tln\ ZOY0ý?VQ(A4 M~~zoov I;:h V5S~ '-' QIZ)v 4U ~  %\A GýIYUW4,4 oI~cj~qA.AS~Sp- rkgý,,-- %t*

NU QT\ ~o Cosen JV/Nsqti(X o~ ovi 9 -4, J-14W r~/~ /j,~-

Page 401 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 402 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0,0c- 14, I

Page 403 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shee 1 of A Status: YZ NE] UE"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR42EOOIA Equip. Class Equipment Description AUX BLDG BATTERY CHARGE-R IA Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area O._ A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y21' NCi of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

ITZL4&a 0C3&N 1`AS

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y**/N- UD N/Al

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Ye NO UrJ N/A[]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[E NQ" UD- N/AQ

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YIdNr Ur N/ArI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y&(NO Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 404 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of g Status: YF NO U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R42EOO1A Equip. Class, Equipment Description AUX BLDG BATTERY CHARGE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yd'NC U- NIAC

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y*d NC' UCC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y2/NC UC N/AC1

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YeNC UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM NO UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Date: __ _ __ _ _--

ft/1JranJc~.

Page 405 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'S r0

-t C

"9 0-V C

Page 406 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Yrd-' -q(

Page 407 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Iv 1 Shtat N Status: Y uN[]of&Uil Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR42EO02B Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description AUX BLDG BATTERY 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area .. 12" Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YdNO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[3/N[" UD N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yi/N0 UO N/A]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[ENO UO N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[iND U- N/ADl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

La i3o 4 -_P-94

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of 4 NO UF-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 408 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'44 qlpolld-Sheet 2OfS Status: YVM NEI UEI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIR42EO02B Equip. Class, Equipment Description AUX BLDG BATTERY 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y2ý'NLJ UD NJA[J1

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yrd]N- U- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YINEI UI- N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YiND"I UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE[!NO UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/i ci!1" Evaluated by:. Pew; ft Date: to -

11 SY&D/w'~, ((ak,

ýý(o IP h e. j I 'K44 d k I i-2t'-41"(L i I /

Page 409 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 NJ Page 410 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 J~

Page 411 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 412 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 413 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 414 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 415 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1of 0 ý Status: YO N1 UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43EOOIA Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER BIF Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 3e!ý Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? l

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yfý'ND- UD N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yo ND UO N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y ND UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y1 ND UO N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yg NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 416 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of jo Status: YE] NRI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43EOOIA Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description SEQUENCER BIF Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free fiom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE] NM Ur N/AC L4T It It~'~~c I- C~ZVIA3/4 DG- Lc" iSZ65I0')i Cp¶iCZ (C:ý; tFco Y rG

, A')cu a i .&\4-) i ,a-Y I~ aY(.

\1 'C C'VY

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y) NEI UE] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yo NE- UE] N/AE]

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y.1'FNE] UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yd NEI UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: AThvWarag Wv- (AG(Wq Date: 9 f-* 1/I 6/z II 1jZ Page 417 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

- I Page 418 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 it-tAM tr 4

Page 419 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1:,,t1 ,

Page 420 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Iel- q'i Page 421 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 4 Status: YN N] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1R43E002A. PKG Equip. Class' 20 F!-99 Equipment Description SEQUENCER BIFAUX RELAY PANEL Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY FloorEl. 139 Room, Area 343 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YD NE]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE" N/A]

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO] UE- N/Af" oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO] UO N/Ar

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NE] U'- N/Ar (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference SEWS Package dated 5124194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NOl UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 422 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43EOO2A. PKG Equip. Class *v FI-99 Equipment Description SEQUENCER B1F AUX RELAY Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UU- N/AO Three two inch conduits are supportedon the Eastside of the cabinet.

The gap between the conduits and panel is about I*, but due to the rigid conduit support (welded to an embedded wall plate), the cabinet is judged to be free from impact during a seismic event

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YJ0 NO- U-1 N/AQ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO- U- N/Al

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NO U-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NM U' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This package was originallysigned on 8-28-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay by Telecon Date: 8/28/12 awqýmull to i1141W2- 8/28/12 Page 423 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 424 of 562

MJn QkIcrfsP-*PTAI1 VIFRSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS ....-.....

-b Page 425 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 f'1-100 Sheet 1ofI Status: )0 N[] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43T502 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description FUEL OIL DAY TANK Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area OC63 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yf'ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yo[ NDI UD N/AD

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yi- ND UD N/AD oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y3 NDI UD N/AD

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YC& NO UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Ff-s~vjscw ~f'c CiaCWO ' 12ý1 'L??

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YJB NO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 426 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F!l - I/D)

Sheet 2 of $4 Status: Ytj NCI UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIR43T502 Equip. Class, Equipment Description FUEL OIL DAY TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YnNE UD- NIAD

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[* ND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

Y*1ND U N/AD

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YýND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YY ND UD-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

E~valua~ted hv- *ACiIIA a'V~

&WU Lait- "~ji Date: 9//Z U ~.

IItZ~oi 2 C

\ ~ /1~A-ta4 Page 427 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 428 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rZ-Inio0 Page 429 of 562