ML14071A069

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562
ML14071A069
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A069 (39)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of.2 5 Status: Y[E'ND] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIN23POOIB Equip. Class Equipment Description AUX FODWA TER PUMP 1B Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 16z.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructlons for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anehoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itein one Y@1'ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[(NN3 UD N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y4 NEI ur N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YC/ NDI UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y6 N* uNU potentially adverse seismic conditions?

3Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 234 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofX !

FT 40 Statm: YGý NO UE[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIN23POOIB Equip. Class, Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 1B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE4NC UEJ N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[f"NO UW N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YEYND UE] N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZA'TD UEJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YLP oD UID adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by- Y1VA0$

T/M Date: 911*f4Z-PAOL A419ZLJ 12;1'(%Z'

/

Page 235 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 236 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS A

I Page 237 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 V

Page 238 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 fi- 1 Sheet 1oft 5'J4d4)

Status: Y[A*'] UE-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIPI1LT0516 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area C -

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YOEIý of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y*NO U" N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface )0<0l UE N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y ND UD N/All
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y* N] UN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B; Classes of Equipment.

Page 239 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet Y f uw)

F1-4 Status: Yj7NE] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. OtPlILT0516 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? U- N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YVNIO U-1 N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached fines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? P1UO N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Tki46Luo of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Condtions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could W U0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4c Date:I.-ý -'0/>

Vtok I QAptLOt~ A 6/'

Page 240 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I - * ! -

11 Page 241 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 U'

Page 242 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 71

/

t Page 243 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of ,

Status: Yw [-] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIPTO01 Equip.

Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. YARD FloorEl. 155 Roo:

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

ýý.g "bI7/38q ;lek., 6.o A.yj B-617/i007 -,Wz ee.Piz

2. Is the anchorage flee of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y*r`NN U- N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yj1 ND UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is'p7.G- r o O UO "r/ f/A/..
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yi*ND- UD- N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YNO UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

pp,,, . ýb /-7/ 3reV.,z6 , a.

7U4*f ,A 1,-7/oo7.4.42 Ver..zo

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YONOUn potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 244 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of ,*L- )

Status: Y*'N((] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OllITO01 Equip. Class' Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TAN, Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y[N14 UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling files and lighting, Yt*Nrl UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZNE=] UDI N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Ytý/N UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YfANID UDI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: *^,I Date: 9o //2OZ.

~-// -2NL Page 245 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 246 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS A.

Page 247 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y@"NE] U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP15HV3100 Equip. Class, Pouinment Desrintinn RHR HXiSAMPLE VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 77 Room, Area / 8 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yf ND U0 N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YVND UO"N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YD ND UD N/A&'

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of te 'NOUD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 248 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sthaeet of 3 Status: 7*Nn- U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP15HV310A &'. Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR HXA SAMPLE VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y*'< U' N/AC
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y'4*NrJ U" N/ACl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YtN2I" UM N/A[
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y/N*V UEJ of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could U[0 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

YIl1, 0 v 3 it5, Evaluated by:

4I- (/-IfAjýI"t ; -

- ý y Date: 19. /0, ZOF?

9iclt*

I Page 249 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

'3 I

I Page 250 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1 1 1111111 11, I IN I Sheet 1 of 4 Fl-' Status: Y[1 N1UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIOJI.F50.A - Equip.

Equipment Description SW STRAINER IA Location: Bldg. $WIA Floor El, l7 Room, Area  : f12,A Manmfacftr, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Insttmetions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Aichorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y$ No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? YK TM "110/61-1.
2. Is the anchorage fre of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YINEJ U0 N/AU

3. Is the anchorage fre of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete ner the anchors? .NIJ UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentaion?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of dhe 50% for which an anchorage configuration vafication is required.)

t24- 6U9 .A-Iiacýt VC r. z2-0 YK N* UUI

6. Based on the above anchmrage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

iEDWe the equipmmentca name from Appendi B: Classe of Equpmeat.

Page 251 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 0464 Sfttus: YO) NO U!]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1PfIFWOIA - ,Equ.

Clasw T Equipmeant Deacaiption, SW STINNE&i1

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or stncturcs?

Yr$ NO 110 N/AIJ

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, cefling tiles and lighting. NEI ur N/AC) and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? A~ NO 110 N/AO 7-N -1
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Advm-se Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could A[fiND UO adver*ly affect the safety li~mcdions of the equipment?

C=mmts (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tt-w-iolt cormsion ,

Evaluaxted by:rý &I IAAa17 Date: _q/'i/r.L2 7wtY~aco* LoamroModa/ t1/4fiz Page 252 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 253 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 254 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of:# I?

Status: YdNON" U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIPI6FV3009A Equip. Class, Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SERVICE WATER DISCHARGE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO -

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO] NEI UE] N/A1 I IQ -I- I of CZ tpcoNe-.3
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO] NO] UO]N/c oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NEI UO NIAIV
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE UE] N/Ab" (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of e'N] UOE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 255 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Ofa+

Ss t( Status: Y[]*'N[N] Ut-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1PI6FV3009A Equip. Class1 7 Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SERVICE WA TER DISCHARGE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YfKq lVO N/AE]r

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YeD U0 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y UD N IAU0
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yt~$Io U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could INC UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/111014L hS(~~~~ ( i~16~f(t/~/N Po -, 614 dXVs Evaluated by: Date: , 21. ,2

.4-2/Z1~/

Page 256 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 257 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 14pl V3rm PileF (v(0 ýrI el f

for Page 258 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rf - &-I Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Yl NR- UI"J Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP16G517B Equip. ClassL 20 Equipment Description TURB BLDG SW ISO VALVE RELAY BOX Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0O03'5(;.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yf No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? 1
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yq NO U- N/AC
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yý. NO U[] N/A[

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YQA NIO UC N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Ylq NC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y4 N UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 259 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Fl-,0 Status: Yo Nn U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1P16G517B Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description TURB BLDG SW ISO VALVE RELA Y BOX Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YNO UD N/AU

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment? 14
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NC] UO N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YERNO U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI" NEI UO]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment? P-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ~~I ~h)&CJLu ~ Date: _/ _,/ ,,

I I/

4 ?l6~z.

/

Q..A4 7

TA I MK{Lý" I

', oI -z.Ol Page 260 of 562

AH TA TCEN 3:

s S SA4 C A LKDO VW VCHECKL IST S No. SNCF164_RPT.,

VRFSION 2.0 4

Page 261 Of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 She1 of4 q Status: U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIPlOMOV3149 Equip. Classý 8 Equipment Description BLOWDOWN HX ISOLATION MOV Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2:ýo Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UC N/A.E
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UF N/A['

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YF'] NO U[L N/A[Y knr' Q~~-NYO0
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UQ NIAY 1 (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y11 NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 262 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofjq Status: Y/ NEI UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIP16MOV3149 Equip. Class, Equipment Description BLOWDOWN HX ISOLATION N1 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YEA NO U[ N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yrj NO UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIA NO UC N/AC
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yi NO UC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9/"N UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 1 93I7 jtV/f

- Q -* '*--* Date:

Page 263 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 264 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Ff..,P it ,-, 1-1 Page 265 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet I of 3 nI- ý1 Status: Y$] NC UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIPf6POO1C Equip. Class, Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP 1C Location: Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 72.. A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorate I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yg ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YJ NO UEJ N/AD
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface NO UD N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y'(N[ UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? ¥/6N[0 UD N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of N[3 uNJ potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 266 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Ps 0 Status: Yo Nn U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ED No. QIP16POOIC Equip. Class' 6 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP IC Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y4.,,,NE U0 N/AEI
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yj:ifm U- N/Afl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yý NE UFC N/AEI
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEI UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

L. '.*

  • LC j.
  • JfwtAiTj, O Ia tiuvin KA/2-la' Date: 8/.*1,*2 A, U~Uf 1ý .43 )& 12.

\jý,f \j ,

Page 267 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 T"*_r f,,,Q D

Page 268 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 SI-7D Sheet i of/Y4 Fl- 70 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: YP N[] Ut]

Equipment U) No. Q1P16V514 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description SERVICE WA TER TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLA TION VALVE Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area ,'49 A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE) NJ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)? I
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE) NE) UE) N/Alp
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE) UE) N/A.

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE) NEI UE) N/Ar9
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE) UE) N/A[ý (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y? NEI U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 269 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F*/-70 Sheet 2 Of 14 Status: Y No N] -]

Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ED No. QIP16V514 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLATION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ylp NrJ UMJ N/AOJ
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NOl UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? 'iiP NO UQ N/Afl
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free V NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could "V3 NE UQ" adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Law-n '____oC_ Date: __

z, A,"9Mt Date:

/ ,-

Page 270 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

\I Page 271 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I t- "7o f1 Page 272 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A069&oldid=2634596"