ML14071A064

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562
ML14071A064
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A064 (44)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r1- I q Sheettu of 3 Status: ýýiNil] U0:

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO5A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP ROOM COOLE -R 1A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 13l e

  • Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0"N-of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

erý. U/<ý7/37 Vee, /0

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YbI-e Ur- N/A'
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YP40IuJ N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yr<U u[] N/A0
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y/N' U0"N/Al]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for T~o.6. ol.07- (a /'. W1, I, which an anchorage configuration verification is required.) o . *, i 'c-f

.*,~ ~ ~~ =t fdo-5f:.

  • .,,Pee'

'r <a46Q " 114 '

6. Based onthe above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YU4I] U0]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 47 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

.- IS Sheet.Of 3 Status: 70NL UUC Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO5A Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Descriptton AUX FEEDWA TER PUMPROOM COOLER 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? V(NQ UD3 N/AO YVIýO N/1AO*
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Y IND UO N/AD

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

YtNQUEJNA

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

-17 E~valuated hv: l L<h'r&j -Y 1, Date: "ý2- Y. ZC/,7, r7-~-;- *-1.-~ - - -

deLc,(L o 1 ~ qrOP 15 ?9-Z- . It Page 48 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 j-,. . . . . .

Page 49 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: YUa-ID U[3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO6B Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGING ROOM COOLERS Location: Bldg. AUXIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 3 .A40),

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one ENS of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? 'ONO UQI N/AC
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Ytr'NN U0 N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? kIKNN U" N/A[
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[QN NDE] N/AI&N/-

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of ýNO UD potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 50 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

~-~e- ~ -

Sheet2f3 Status: Y[N- U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment [D No. OIE16HO06B Equip. Class' Equipment Description BATTERY CHARGING ROOM ( OOLERS Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? U N/AQ tiE]1'
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Vý< NE tiC N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? *'"NO UD N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YQa/NO UOE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. t1ave you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Z*'N[] Uti adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

A

~.

.7

~u'jg- I~IL.,

if fV Ar.

f.r -~ V Date:  %. Z. 2, o/.

QA151A( bl4elac6, Page 51 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 52 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/-ZI Sheetsof:

Status: zz ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE16HOO8A Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description MCC 18 ROOM COOLER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Z09 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0'N[]

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ'ND UE N/A"I
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI'ND- U"I N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YQ/N[' UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[E]N Uf' N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verificit~ion is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YOJNC- UD*

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 53 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of' V,'.w Status: Y NMNI'- U t] 41 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. OIE16HOO8A Equip. Class' Equipment Description MCC 1B ROOM COOLER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y!JND UIO N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YQ' 1NO Ur N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y6 NO UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yf ND UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could N D UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 5TAt LE' E 7H(5 HAS 00 A'VA*iý;

tjj(,T- 14IFF Oc L) C P ýJ " T 1*- To C,? t r=

Page 54 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 55 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

,t- 4 ý Page 56 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 57 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 58 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i ofW 1 -3 Status: Yo N[] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. A IEI6HOO9 Equip. Casso, 10 Equipment Description 600VLOADiCENTER 1t ROOM COOLER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area ~3'1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anclhorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yb NED UD N/Arl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y4 NDI UDJ N/A[D oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO U- N/AU]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[" N[] U-] N/A[D (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YW N[3 Ur potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 59 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F:)",,%k Sheet 2 ofA*i3 Status: YO NR' UMI]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E16HO09 Equip. Class, 10 Equipment Description 600V LOAD CENTER 1D ROOM COOLER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YNEI U- N/Afl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YiUNQ UC N/AC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YV NO UD N/A0
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y1 NO U]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YV NEI UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 2 "kUA~f~ 01Aa 4YALArc4 ?kVA(16h1 Date: 912,-942, 4-011m kMdL1kj i v I U

-<j--,i , V Page 60 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 61 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1;3 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ N1 UE3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, QIE21FT0940,Pko Equip. Class' 18 FI-23 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 77 Room, Area II1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist TI7his checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorafe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YIZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NE UO N/A[
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NCi UC N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y9 No U- N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UOi N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Reference U733260 V2

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix 8: Classes of Equipment.

Page 62 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F1.Ao3 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YNNl U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E21FTO940,Pkac Equip. Class' 18 FI-23 Equipment Description HIGH HEAD SAFETY INJECTION FLOW TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y0 NEI U!] N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NEI U! N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ N! U!] N/A!
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NiO U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 N!] U!

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Note that the second picture shows a bag tied to the instrument valves.

This is not a seismic concern.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This package was originallysigned on 8-28-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-15-12.

Laura Maclav bv Telecon Ki/jýIfi ~-

Evaluated by:. Date: 8/28/12 Ter~t71n"ilx - 8/28/12 Page 63 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 V--1-3 Page 64 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 65 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rj -7,4 Sheet/ of3 Status: ,I NO U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE21HV8152 Equip. Class, Equipment Description CVCS ISOLA TION OUTSIDE CTMT VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXIUARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area k84 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchoraae

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UD N/Ab'ý IAI 1 L/j CDAI r'T
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NE] UED NIA['

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/AIV7
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE UE] NIA{&-'*

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6, Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of E UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 66 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheetts Of 3 Status: Y*NF] vr-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment I]3 No. OIE21HV8152 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description CVQ$S iOLA TION OUTSIDE CTMT VAL VE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y(/N/ UD N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y *'N U[- N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?

,/

Y*"N] U0 N/A-

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y2(ND U"O of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YoND UE' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: VIL/I Q) ,Date:

4 Pi~e4L~~

)

"Za?

Page 67 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 68 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I 21,zI Sheet 1of /If Status: YJA NE] UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE21LCVO115E Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description VCT OUTLET ISOLATION VALVE Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora~e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y] N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NE] UE] N/A[M
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE N/A*a oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE] N/AR]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE] UE] NiAx (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NE] UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

/1 ~

Page 69 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 ofx4 Status: Y[ NEI U]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIE21LCVO115E Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description VCT OUTLET ISOLA TION VALVE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yo NEI UC N/AD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y2 N[l ULO] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YA NO UD N/AD
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y/N NO1UOI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Ytd NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:. Tt 0*-V ALA+J M 'AUL&4 ( ýL / *7 T-i%2 /ýý Date: g.5/12-

'/ -4 / C",

I ijiirn LAtlrfa\J U II V~"

V U

Page 70 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 iI- an - C, Loc -2 i -e T-fil ý Page 71 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 p'l-;n -stoc, A-/A Page 72 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheea : ofUL]A'.

Status: NO] UnI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) kf/1 11119 Equipment ID No. Q1E21MOV8885 Equip.

Equipment Description HHSI TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area I 1 4,5 Manufacturer. Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Jr Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YoE]~

of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NEI ULE] N/Av"/

/)ý)- 4 Ilit Gosif PolJi<

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE] NEI U0 NIAla" oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NE UE] N/A
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NE UE N/Avef' (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of NE]UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 73 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 15-3 0 Shee2 of 3 Status: Z rNru0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No, QIE21MOV8885 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HHSI TO RCS COLD LEG ISOLATION Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y240- UD N/A[
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling dies and lighting, NI-1 U[I N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YtN/3 U1 N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free lj/O ijO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects'?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could /NI" UI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) lolvv 4L62 MUIHI&5 (/C~e, .i~ r A7 ~ q 0uZ/bym-/

Evaluated by: Date: t 2-,4, 20/Z-J j Page 74 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS 0

Page 75 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ki -;51 Sheet 1 of*-4 ;Y-/

Status: Yt NO U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1E21P002A Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description CHARGING/HHSI PUMP POO2A TRAIN A Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area C0\V>\

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorate

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yi NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yi[ NO UO N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YJ/NO UO N/An oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y'6 NO UO N/AO
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YTJ NO UO N/AO (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y'NO UE' potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 76 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0

-- F1 "3 t Sheet 2 ofLf Status: Y[2 NM U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QlE21POO2A Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description CHARGINGIHHSI PUMP POO2A TRAIN A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YId NO UO N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y46 NO UO N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YdT NO UQ N/AO
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y&T'NO UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YjI NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated Date: ___5_1_al)_Ia-12tiljt~ke _ _ _ __7 V

Page 77 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 78 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r

I-)

V.,

Page 79 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 SheetNofx 1 I Status: YIJZ NI] UO Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. Q1FI6LT0502 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location: Bldg. YARD Floor E. 15L Room, Area _ _ _ _

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YI54[O UD N/A[3

2. Ibthe anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y* UD N/ADI oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI-O U0 N/AQI (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage frie of Y/OUEn potentially adverse seismic conditions?

SEnter the equipment ca name from Appendix B: Classes of Equpent.

Page 80 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of Status: YEA NO uC Seismic Walkdown Checlids (SWC)

EquipmentID No. 01F16LT0502 Equip. Clas 1 .. 18 Equipment Description RWST LEVEL TRANSTTER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? U[3EN/AD
8. Are ovrha eqimet distribution systems, ceiling tame and lighting, ýUD N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YU Q N/AD3
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment frie /N UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yt"NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Commenta (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Fpo, )t /19,/ .99& p4_"

P5 e-, A ",,, e,,,, *S,-*,j"d ,

eczS .~ Co*r~A~ 0^o, file

&&nV ~.1,~ ~ rt/i.xi i.

Evaluatedhy: P o v t , ,- Date: C,)j Page 81 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 (N

Page 82 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 pi1-3 1-( c V/?

Page 83 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 EA Page 84 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-O1, VERSION 2.0 Page 85 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 141 Page 86 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheep of 'y"/'0' Status: VI'NE] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. Q1F16T0501 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Roomn1,Area RV57 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchora2e

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ<NCI" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YPI'N[- UEr N/All
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO/N U- N/AD oxidation? '- ,  : >" 4v1. , . 1&

Al, Ck .5/J f

(.4#J& S7. 1,t

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y2.-.ND3 UD" N/AD]

Axi 4 R /cs&o7 VA)~~

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? )42"NO U- N/AD-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of kI'C5NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 87 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F--,Z3 Sttsh 2 OfA Status: 1ý NO U0--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. QIF16TO501 Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Description REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Ya<O UO N/ACD
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[*L24 U-] N/AUl and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y&-D UO N/AE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free VAsNh UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could vxi*D, UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 1 A4 4C

.9w Evaluated by: L*/d:L7 kj/4tL"--.a-j ZZ Date: 2,,/,*, z D0 ..

4-12A~. jL4L2 Page 88 of 562

NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 89 of 562

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 90 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A064&oldid=2453527"