ML12355A666

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 7 of 11
ML12355A666
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Stewart W
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2269 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12355A666 (63)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YE] NO U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P021 Equip. Class:

Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 .. Room, Area SE DiaqonalUnif 2 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..

Anchoralle

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yo- NZ of the, 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE] NS UE] N/AL]

There is one anchor missing on: the south side ofthe.supportfor Instrument Rack 2H21-P021 (CR 515727). There is a good deal of debris in.the hole, so it is unsure whether the anchor is broken off, removed or was never installed There are seven other anchorsin good condition, and the rackframe is very stiff.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE] UE- N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YI NEI UE] N/AL]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE] NEI UE] NIAS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage, evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NE'I UE' potentially adverse: seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 271 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE] NZ U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2EH21-P21 Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U-- N/A[]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ,ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ Nil U'- N/AEl and masonry block walls:not likely to collapse onto-the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEIl U N/AEl
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NEI UFI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UL]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area Walk-By performedfor component 2E21-CO01B.

Date: 09/11/2012 Page 272 of 394

rrl 0 >

C C)

-I CD CD

'3 m r -

z o

~.

Z 0

0 0 m o N~ U)

~

0 C-Nj 211 (A o z

0 (U

-. m 0)

C) al)

(14 Kl) C) 0 100 C/m z0 z

0 z0 r

00 03 z

0 Z

NoI z UT

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 - Equipment Elevation (212 l-FP21)

Page 274 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Missing Anchor on Rack Support (2H21-P021)

Page 275 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 7 Status: YZ ND- U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P410 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description JET PUMP INSTR RACK Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area R107A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE N/AD There are four anchors of the 10 anchors that have cut washers. The cutting of these washers has no affect on the ability of these four anchors to carry the seismic loads applied to them during a seismic event. Therefore, the anchorage is seismically acceptable.

3, Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YER NEI UD N/AD oxidation?

There is mild surface corrosionon one of the anchors. SWE's determined that this is seismically acceptable due to minimal corrosion.

4, Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI U[- N/AD 5, Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE- NE UED N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NF- U[E potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 276 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: Y[ N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P410 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description JET PUMPINSTR RACK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI U-3 N/AL
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and: lighting, YZ NEI UE- N/All and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO] U[] N/AL
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ Nl UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS NEI UI" adversely affect'the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by:.John McFarland Date: 9/17/12 Jeff Hofon, 9/17/12 Page 277 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: Y] N[- U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P410 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description JET PUMP INSTR RACK Photographs Figure 1 Equipment ID (2H21-P410)

Page 278 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Figure 2 Picture of Full Rack Page 279 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Figure 3 View of Anchors with Cut Washers Page 280 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Figure 4 Additional Anchor with Cut Washer Page 281 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Figure 5 Corroded Anchor Page 282 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status- YZ NEIl u--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P404A Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description RX VESSEL INSTR RACK Location:. Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 158 Room, Area RG-R17 Manufacturer, Model, Etc.. (optional but recommended).

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an itemof equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions maybe used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorae.

1., Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN Ni of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NO] UE] N/A-
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NO- UL- N/AL oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks: in the concrete near the anchors? YN NO UL- N/AU
5. Is the anchorage; configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y21 NE] UE' N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration Verification is required.)

The anchoragewas compared againstthe SQUG package dated 2118194.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UF potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter. the equipment class name from Appendix1B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 283 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YI NE] Ut]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H2-P404A - Equip. Class, Equipment Description RX VESSEL 1IJSTR RACK Interaction Effects:

7. Are soft targets free from impact, by nearby equipment or structures? YU NEI ULJ N/AL]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NI] UI] N/AL and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NI] U0- N/AL-One hole clamp behind the rack is missing for one of the cables.However, this is judged not to be a seismic concern since this is rathera thick cable and the span is short.
10. Based on the above seismiic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y1 Ni U-]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NI] UE-adversely affect the safety. functions of the equipment?

,Comments (Additional pages may be added as.necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI ýIA 4 Date: 9/25120W2 WESLEY WILLIAMS 9/25/2012 Page 284 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YN N[-] U[-

hL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P404A Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description RX VESSEL INSTR RACK Photographs Page 285 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 286 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YZ NEI u-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T48-NOO9A Equip. Class. 19.

Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature Elemc*nt Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area Torus Room Bay 9 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE NEI UEl N/AO The equipment is an inline component, so there is no anchorage.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE" NEI UE NWA oxidation?
4. Is the. anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO, NEI UE N/AN
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NE UE N/ACD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment classname from Appendix B:. Classes of Equipment.

Page 287 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet2 of 5 Status: Y[ NEI ur1 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T48-NOOQA Equip. 1 Equipment Description Toru8 WaterTem0eratureElement Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YO NO UD N/ADl There is a conduit rwmlngpast the component to the wall thatpasses approximately I "from.the equipment. The conduit is attachedto the same support as the tempemture element, so the twocomponents will move together. Since there will be no differentialseismic motion between them, there Isno potentially adverseseismic condition.

8., Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NDI Ul N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YCR NQ U["J N/A-
10. Based, on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NOQ UF of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adyerse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NOi UrI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarleod Date: 09,26/2012 Jeff Horton 0,926t2012 Page 288 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UB]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T48-NOO9A Equip. (

Equipment Description Torus Water Temperature L3Iement Photographs Photographs Figure 1 - Equipment ID No (2T48-NO09A)

Page 289 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 - Equipment Elevation (2T48-NO09A)

Page 290 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Gap Between Conduit and Component (2T48-NO09A)

Page 291 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1,of 3 Status: YjM NEI U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO19A. . Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description HPCI PUMPROOM COOLER TE Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the, SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.,

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ' of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE' N/AL]
3. Is.the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NO UE3 N/AE]

oxidation?

4. Isthe anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE ULJ N/All
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE1, NEI UE1 N/AN (Note: This question, only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI. UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the. equipment class name tfrom Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 292 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3:. SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipm~ent ID No. 2T41-NOI9A Equip.0Cass, Equipment Description HPCI PUMP ROOM COOLER.T E Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI N/Al The overhead crane was evaluated during SQUG walkdowns for the item in this rom (2E41-C002) and found to be seismically adequate.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NOl UE] N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0. NEI UL N/AEI
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO] U of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yl. No] UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for 2E2,1-COOIB.

Evaluated by KURSA T KINALI Date: 9124/2012 WESLEY WILLIAMS ., 9/24/2012 Page 293 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NO] Ur]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO19A Equip. Class" 19 Equipment Description HPCI PUMPROOM COOLER TE Photographs Page 294 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YN Nn] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID.No. 2T41-NO20A Equip. Class, Equipment

Description:

CS/RHR Pump Room Cooler TE Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 108ý Room, Area SE Diagonal Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This. checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item .of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions maybe used to record the results,of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the; item one YO- N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage:free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NEI U[- N/Ar]

31.Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0 NO, U[J N/AL]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage: free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YJZ NE! Ul] N/All
5. Is the anchorage. configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE! NO! UE! N/AN (Note: This question-only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage: free of YN NEl U-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

The top left anchor does not have full engagement of the bolt. The end of the bolt is approximately 1/16" below the nut. The other three bolts arefully engaged 3/8" dia. anchors, andhave enough capacity to support the small, light component. Therefore, there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes.of Equipment.

Page 295 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] UE]

Sei~smic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NQ2OA - Equip. Class:

Equipment Description CS/RHR PUmn0 Room Cooler TE Interactioni Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[3 U[-- N/A[]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[@ NEI UE' N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility-to avoid damage? Y0 NEI UE' N/AU
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YO NEI UE3 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI U[:]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: John McFartand: Date: 09/26/2012 Jeff Horton 09/26/2012 Page 296 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ N] ui-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO20A Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description CS/RHR Pump Room Cooler TE Photographs Figure 1 - Equipment ID No (2T41-N020A)

Page 297 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 -- Equipment Elevation (2T41-NO20A)

Page 298 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Bolt Lacking Full Thread Engagement (2T4 I -N020A)

Page 299 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN NE] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO21A Equip. Class, 19 Equipment Description CS/RHR PUMPRM COOLER TE Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. i19' Room, Area NE DiaconalRoom Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic. Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end, of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item, one YEI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

SEWS Package 2T41-NO21A does not specifically addressanchorage of component.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NEI UE- N/AU
3. Is the.anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NEI U[- N/AUi oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors? YN NEI Uli N/Aii
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plantdocumentation? YEI NEI UEi N/A[R (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based, on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NO UE3 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 300 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 2T41-N021A Equip. Classi 19 Equipment Description CS/RHR PUMP RM COOLER TE Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ N[I UL N/All 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI U!I N/Ar-I and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

SEWs package describes that a pull test was performed on Emergency Lights Tag No. 2R42E107 above the subject component and it was acceptable.

9. Do attached lineshave adequate. flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NEI UI] N/AE 10., Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE' of potential lyadverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE UD]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional. pages may. be added as necessary)

Component tag is barely visible. Thejtag is a small embossed tag. The companionjunction box has a tag number written on it but the ink is fading.

Low Dose Waiting areasign has one comer loose. SWE's have determined that this flexible light weight sign will cause'no damage to the component. Therefore, the loose sign is seismically acceptable.

Evaluated by: John Mcfarland Date: 9/24/12 Jeff Horton 9/24/12 Page 301 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN N[-] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO21A Equip. Class, Equipment Description CSIRHR PUMPRM COOLER T1 Photographs Photographs Figure 1 Equipment ID: 2T41-N02IA Page 302 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 Componcnt Anchorage to Wall Page 303 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3: Companion Junction Box for 2T41-N021A Note: Fading ink with component number.

Page 304 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YZ N1] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO22A Equip. Class, Equipment Description RCIC PUMPROOM COOLER TE Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area NWVDiagonal (on the platform)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgmaents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorare

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y-I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NO UI-- N/AU One of the four spring nuts behind the equipment attachingit to the unistrut is not fully in compression and sits sideways. However, this is judged not be a seismic concern by SWEs since the other three spring nuts are in compression. The unistrut is welded to the embedded wall plate. Right bottom comer bolt doesnot have a washer installed.

However this is not a seismic concern since the bolt hole is not oversized.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UL- N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI Uil N/AU"
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yrl NO ULE N/AZ (Note: This question only applies ifthe item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 305 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[-] UM]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2T41-N022Ao Equip. Class Equipment Description RCIC PUMP ROOM COOLER E

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y23NEIULO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UI- N/AZ-
8. Are. overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling,tiles and lighting, Yl NEI U[J N/AU and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do; attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NEI UL- N/AU
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y. NEIUr of potentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NIo U0I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Platform area walkby was performed within this package, Le., 2T41-NO22A.

Floorat 87' area walkby was performed within the package for 2E51-COOI.

Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI Date: 9/25/2012 WESLEY WILLIAMS / 9/25/2012 Page 306 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: YZ Nn] U['-]

Equipment ID No. 2T41-NO22A Equip. Class' 19 Equipment Description RCIC PUMPROOM COOLER TE Photographs Page 307 of 394

. ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 xx Page 308 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

Sheet I of 4 Status: YE N--] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P173 Equip. Class" 20 Equipment Description SHUTDOWN INSTRUMENT PANEL Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area 2R103 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel and enclosure to panel opened per work order SNC427042..

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U1-1 N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NE] UE N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the:concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UE- N/AEl
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YiE NE UU N/AU" (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage consistent with that shown in SEWS package for equipment dated 02/16/1994.

6. Based on the above anchorage. evaluations, is the anchorage .free of YN N- UI" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 309 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ N[-] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. 2k212e173 Equip.. Class Equipment Description SHUTDOWN INSTRUMENT PA,NEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN Nil UIIJ N/AL
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles, and lighting, YZ N[] Ur] N/AE],

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Panelis located inside large steel enclosure, only open from the top.

Conduit and overhead equipment in area directly above is adequately supported.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YIE NO UE- N/All
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YER NET U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Components inside-panelwere inspected visually in accordancewith the -directionprovided in the FAQ relatedto opening panels.

Comments (Additional pages may: be added as necessary)

See 2C82-P001 forAWC information.

Evaluated by: Juan Vi2gava Date: 09/18/2012 Evlae y:Ja6WcaaDt:091/01 PatrickKelly 0911812012 Page 310 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 Of 4 Status: YM NW- U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P173 Equip. Class, 20 Equipment Description SHUTDOWN INSTRUMENT PANEL Page 311 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 2: Equipment Elevation (2H21-P173)

Page 312 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ Nn] UD' Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No.. 2H21-P202 Equip. Class Equipment Description DG IC RELAY PANEL 1A Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area SWITCHGEAR ROOM 2G Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)t Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item .ofequipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions maybe used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e.,. is the item one YZ NE]

of the. 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panels were openend per work order SNC427042.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NEI UDI N/AU]

Anchorage consists of welds from the base of the panel to embedded steel in the concrete pad.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is:more than mild surface Y9 NI-] UI] N/AI oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NEI UI- N/AU-
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YV NEI U-- N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage. configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package, dated 02/17/1994 and SCNH-93-088, Rev. 0.

Orginally identified as an A-46 and IPEEE outlier due to potential impact to adjacentpanels. DCR 91-144 detailsplates to be :installedto connect the top of 2H21-P202to the adjacentpanels. The walkdown verified these plates were installed.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y I] UI-1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 313 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ Nn". ULI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentiD No. 2H21-P202 Equip. Class' Equipment Description, DG 1C RELAY PANEL 1A interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment, or structures? YZ NE U:] N/AO
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[0 NE UlI N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to: collapse onto the equipment?

Overhead light is properly supported with wire ties. Light is not directly over the panel and is judged not to be a seismic concern for the panel.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NO UO N/AU Rigid raceways 2E23439 and 2E23438 are adequately supportedat the cabletrayand at the top of the panel
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YE NO UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

.Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yt. NOl UO--1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Winston Stewart Date: 09/17/2012

'.1 PatrickKelly 09/17/2012 Page 314 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZJ NEI U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2H21-P202 Equip. Class!

Equipment Description DG IC RELAY PANEL 1A Photographs Photographs 1: Equipment MPL# (2H21 -P202)

Page 315 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 hPP.t A nf A 2: Equipment Elevation (2H21 -P202)

Page 316 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YN Nn] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R43-PO01C Equip. Class, Equipment Description DG 1C CONT PANEL Location Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM 2C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and.

findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panels were openend per work orderSNC427042.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U-] N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NE Ur N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NO U171 N/AUl
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NE U- N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration, verification is required.)

Anchorage verified using calculation SCNH-99-406, Rev. 0. A SEWS package dated 10/25/1988 is included within the body of the calculation. There are fillet welds present inside the west side of the panel, northwestsection. There are plug welds at the holes of the angle base of the panel. Two holes are not plug welded, which are located at the northwest section (south end of that section) and the southwest section (north end of that section). See photograph3.

Calculation SNCH-99-406, Rev. 0 provides the SQUG evaluation for this control panel. The SQUG evaluation only takes credit for welds on the outside of the panel. The interiorfillet andplug welds are not consideredas part of the anchoragein the calculation. The addition of the plug welds and interiorwelds only increases the capacity of the panel anchorage. Therefore, it is consistent with the plant documentation.

6. Based on the.above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 317 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet:2 of 5 Status: YZ NE] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R43-POE1Cc Equip. Class Equipment Description DG 1C CONT PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI U[-I N/A[
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE1 N/AFC and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

There is an overheadceiling light directly over the control panel and adjacent to raceway 2E23374. The light is properly attached at the top with wire ties. The light could potentiallyswing and impact the raceway, however, the raceway is rigid and the impact will not cause damage to cables within the raceway. The light is judged to not be a seismic concern.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NE U-] N/AE]

Two rigidraceways (2E23374 and 2E23373) connect to cable tray 2LBA806 with adequateflexibility. A 4" diameterRGS conduit (2E23719 and a 1"diameterRGS conduit connect to the top of the control panel and are next supported approximately 8'-O"above to a strut support. This is not viewed as a seismic concern because he available length of conduit provides adequateflexibility.

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[A NEI Un adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See 2R43-SOOIC for AWC information.

There are two missing screws on the back panels (one on each individualbottom panel)of the equipment. CR 518617 has been written to install these screws, Evaluated by: Winston Stewart Date: 09/17/2012, PatrickKelly 09/17/2012 Page 318 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NO U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R43-POOIC - Equip. Class' Equipment Description DG IC CONT PANEL Photographs 1: Equipment MPL# (2R43-POO1 C)

Page 319 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 2: Equipment Elevation (2R43-POOIC)

Page 320 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 3: Missing Plug Welds (2R43-POO1C)

Page 321 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6

Status: Y- NE- UL]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2C82-POOI Equip. Class, Equipment Description REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area 107A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results .ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e4, is the item: one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Panel opened per work order SNC427042

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, m0issing or loose hardware? YN NEI Ur- N/A[]
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YE NEI UI- N/AL]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI Ul] N/Ar
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YE NO] UEr N/All (Note: This question onlyapplies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with vendor drawing S-28871 and SEWS package dated 02/16/1994.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YE NEI UL]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B:. Classes of Equipment.

Page 322 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NEI u-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2C82-P001 Equip. Class' 20 Equipment Description REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y9 NEI UL[ N/AEl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE- N/A[-1 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The panel is enclosed on all sides and protected by an overhanging plate on the north and south sides.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN N[l UE- N/AUl
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI U-1 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UEJ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There are several cables not properly secured inside the panel (see photograph 3). Movement of the cables will not adversely affect the seismic capacityof the panel anchorageand the cables are not located nearany safety-related components that could be damaged by impact from the cables. It is judged to be seismically adequate.

Components inside panel were inspected visually in accordance with the direction provided in the FAQ related to opening panels.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

The caulk around the door seam of the panel is poorly installed or degraded(see photograph 4). This is not a seismic concern.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcava Date: 09/18/2012 Patrick KellvyýVIAAý 09/18/2012 Page 323 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ Nn U"]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2C82-P001 Equip. Class, Equipment Description REMOTE SHUTDOWN PANEL Photovranhs Page 324 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 2: Equipment Elevation (2C82-POOI)

Page 325 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Shepet rcnf A 3: Loose Cables Inside Cabinet (2C82-P001)

Page 326 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 4: Degraded Caulk Around Door Seam (2C82-P001)

Page 327 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YN N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R43-BOO1A Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL 2A AIR COOLANT HEA T EXCHANGER Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM 2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional butrecommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results, of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at-the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] No of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NE UE N/AU The heat exchanger is bolted to a steel pedestal, which is welded to the deisel generatorsteel framing.
3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrosion that is more than mild surface YED NEI U0 N/AE1 oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE NEI U0 N/AZ Equipment is welded to steel beams supportingthe diesel generator (see photograph3).
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI UE NWAS (Note: This questiononly applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required..)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YNEI UE potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 328 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YN NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R43-BOOIA .Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL 2A AIR COOLANT HEAT EXCHANGER Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI- N/AU Lube oil heat exchanger (2R43-BOO2A) and jacket water heat exchanger (2R43-BOO3A) are supportedby the 2R43-BOOIA heat exchangerpipe with welded steel pedestals between them (see photograph4). The three systems will act together during a seismic event and will not cause impact to one another. This is not a seismic concern.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO U- N/A-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NE UOI' N/AU 6" diameterpipe which is attached to main pipe for heat exchanger is not fixed laterally and will be able to move laterallyduring seismic event. This is not a seismic concern.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y10 NOU-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions: that could YZ NEI Ur-adversely affectthe safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See 2R43-SOOIA for AWC information.

Evaluated by: Juan Vigcava Patrick K*.IIV Patrick Kelly 6' Date: 09/25/2012 09/25/2012 Page 329 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ N[:] U[--

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2R43-BOO1A - Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL 2A A/FR COOLANT HEAT EXCHANGER Photographs 1: Equipment MPL# (2R43-BOO1A)

Page 330 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 2: Equipment Elevation (2R43-B00I A)

Page 331 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet r of 6 3: Support Pedestal (2R43-BO01 A)

Page 332 of 394

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

,,A-+A-,r K.,

4: Three Heat Exchange System Supported Together (2R43-BO01A)

Page 333 of 394

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12355A666&oldid=2089567"