NL-12-2269, SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11

From kanterella
(Redirected from ML12355A633)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 3 of 11
ML12355A633
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Stewart W
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2269 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12355A633 (71)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YN Nn] U-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2C41-C001B

-Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SBLC INJECTION PUMP 2B Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 203 Room, Area 2R414 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othercomments., Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YN NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Washers on equipment to pad connections are missing. An identical, pump right next to this item has washers installed (SBLC Injection Pump 2B). The holes are not over-sized holes, i.e., the heads of the bolts engage for clamping purposes and the mounting surface of the equipment is flat. Therefore, this is judged to be not a seismic concern.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is: the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item. is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was compared against drawing H-25503, Rev. 4.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NEl UE- N/AEl Y] NEI UI- N/Al YU NEI U[ N/AL]YI NEI UL- N/AEl YZ NO] UL Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 53 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YM NO] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2C41-C001B

.Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SBLC INJECTION PUMP 2B Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y0 NI] UE"] N/Al]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YOI NIl Ur] N/AU-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y(@ NEI Ul' N/Al]YN NI UFI Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NI] UI'adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for Boron Solution Tank in the area, 2C41-AO01.

Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI.J WESLEY WILLIAMS Date: 9/11/2012 9/11/2012 Page 54 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2C41-C001B Equip. Class' 5 Equipment Description SBLC INJECTION PUMP 2B NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YM NO- U[]Photographs Page 55 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 56 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y0 Nn-] U-I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-C002-3 Equip.Equipment Description HPCI TURB AUX OIL PUN TP Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions maybe used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..

Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such.verification)?

YOND]2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was confirmed against Drawing H-25020 Version 7.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially:

adverse seismic conditions?

Y10 NEI UEI N/AU Y0 NEI U- N/AU Y0 Nn UO N/AU Y[ NEI UO N/AU YN NEI UU I Enter the equipment class name fromAppendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 57 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[ Nn] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-C002-3 Equip. Class: Equipment Description HPCI TURB AUX OIL PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NEI U[-I N/AL 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y23 Nn U0I N/A[]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YS NEI U[-] N/AL-YN NE] U-'Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UL]adversely affect~the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for 2E21-COO 1B.Evaluated by: kURSAT KINALIA WESLEY WILLIAMS)ate: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 58 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-C002-3 Equip. Class, 5 Equipment Description HPCI TURB AUX OIL PUMP NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ N-] U[-Photographs Page 59 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: YN NEI U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2EI1.-COOA Equip. Class'Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1A Location:

Bldg. INTAKE FloorEl. 11"1 Room, Area Pump Room: Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YC Nil 2. Is the anchorage.free of bent, broken,, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YU NEI UE] N/AU YN NEI U- N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NE UI] N/AU 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

The anchorage was comparedagainst the vendor drawing S-60315 Version 8.0.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations; is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0 NEI U- N/AU-YM NO UO 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 60 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.2 of 3 Status: Y[Q:] NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment IDNo. 2E..1-CCOOIA Equip.Equipment Description PUMP 1A, Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets:free fromr impactby nearb e Ui mentorstructures?

... .. ..= ... .... .. ... .= * .. ... ....... Y q u e o r st... .....Y19 NE] Ut] N/AEr.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceilingtiles and lighting, YI Nt] Ut N/At and nmasonry block walls not likely to collapse o~ntothe equipment?

9. Do attached lines. have adequate flexibility:

to avoid: damage?'10. Based on the above seismicinteiaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seisnicd interaction effects?YN NEI Ut] N/At]YN NO UE]Other Adverse Conditions 1L Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the: safety functions of the equipment?

y0 NEI UtI-Comnments (Additional pages may. b~i added as necessr)ýNote: For area walk-by see AWC for Intake El. 111', Pump Room Evaluated'by:

kuRsATKINALI .a WESLEY WILLIAMS/

-. ý " te: 9025/2012 9/25/2012 Page 61 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ED No. 20 1-COQIA -Equip. Class, 6 Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1A NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NO UE1]Photographs Page 62 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: Y0 NE] U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E11-COOID Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP ID Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 111 Room, Area Intake Pump Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This. checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space. is provided:

at the end of this checklist fortdocumenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y NEI 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only appliesif the item is one of the 50%° for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked against Dwg. H-12211 Version 22.0, S-60315 and SQUG package dated 2/18/94.& Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN NEl U[I N/A[U]Y10 N[-' UE] N/AU YN NO] U'- N/A-YN NEI U-] N/AU YN NEI Ut'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 63 of 394 11ý'ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of Status: Y[ý,'N[] U[]SeiSmic Walkdown.Checklist.(SWC)

Equipment ID No. 2E01-COOID Equip. Class EquipmentDescriptioi RHRSW PUMP ID:Interaction

Effects 7. Are soft targ6ts ,free from, impact by nearby equipment.orsttuctures?

YN NO UV N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,, YE No UO! N/At-1 and masonry block wais not likely to cotlapse onto the equipme0nt?

9. Do attached lines have adequateflexibilityto avoiid damage?10, Based on the.above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse: seismic interaction effects?.Y-l NE UE3 N/AE Y0NO UE Other Adverse Conditions-

!1. Have you, lookedfor and found no other seismic conditions that could YU9 Nn U adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional may be addedas necessary)

Note: For area walk-by see AWC for Intake El. 1 11', Pump Room Evaluated by: KURSAT KINI Date: 911212012 WESLEY WILLIAMS !jd-X 9/12,2012 2/Page 64 of 394

  • ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E0 1-COGID -Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHRSW PUMP 1IQ NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[ N[-] U[]Photographs Page 65 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YE NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-COOIA Equip. Class'Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1A Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 111 Room, Area Pump Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommeinded)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document.the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. IS the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e, is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NEI'2. Is the anchorage freeof bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?'

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation was observed but judged not to be a seismic issue.4., Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5., Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was compared against the Drawing H-4762 Rev. 8.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0 NEI UI" N/AE1 Y23 NE UEr N/AE-YN NEI UE N/AE" YZ NEI UE' N/AE-YZ NEI UE1'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 66 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N] :Ul-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P4I-C001A Equip. Class1 6 Equipment Description.

PSW PUMP 1A Interaction Effects 7.. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment r, structures?

YG NU UEI N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling.tiles and lighting, YSI NO UO N/AU.and masoiry blockwalls not likely to collpse onto tiie~equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentfree of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NEI UCJ N/AU YN NE UUU Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have youlooked for and foundno other seismic conditions thatcould YE N:I UJ-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Coamments (Additiona pages may, be added as neceIssary)

Note: For area walk-by see AWC for Intake El. 111', Pump Room Date: 9/25/2012; Page 67 of 394 Photographs ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-COO1A Equip. Class, 6 Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1A NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN Nn] U-Photographs Page 68 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1of 3 Status: YM Nn] U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-COOB Equip., Classi 6 Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1B Location:

Bldg. INTAKE FloorEl. 111 Room, Area Pump.Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc, (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist maybe used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the f0llowing questionsmay be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required(i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YD NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free ofcorrosionthat is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIN NDI Uil N/AD YO NDI U0 N/AD YS ND UD N/ADl YDI NDI UD- N/A0 YN NEI UE3'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 69 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: 'NE iUE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-COOIB

  • Equip, Class": 6 Equipment Descriptioni.

PSW PUMPI B Interaction Effects;7. Are soft, targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?.YN NO UO N/AO 8. Are overheadoequipment

..distribution systems; ceiling tilesand lighting, YU NO Un N/AL]and masonry block walls not likely to: collapse onto the equipment?

9. Doo attached lines have :adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10, Based on the above evaluations, is equipment free, ofpotentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UEh N/AO YN NO UO.Other Adverse Conditions 1.. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NO 'UO adversely affect the safeoty f.nctions:0f the equipment?, Aderel afec the s.Conmment~s (Additional pages may be'added as necessary)

Note: For area walk-by see AWC for Intake El.1 11F, Pump Room Evaluated by: WESLEY WILLIAMS 4ýDate: 9/12/2012 9/i2/202: KURSAT XINALI.Page 70 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-CQO1B Equip. Class'Equipment Description PSW PUMP 1B NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ N[-] UF" Photographs Page 71 of 394

., ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YJ NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-C002 Equip. Class' 6 Equipment Description PSW STANDBY PUMP 1B DIESEL Location:

Bldg. INTAKE Floor El... 111' Room, Area Pump Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional.

but recommended)

Instructions:

for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each ofthe following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting othercomnients.

Anchorage 1. Is the, anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

Mild surface corrosion was seen on bolts and at places where the grating interfaces with baseplate.

This is judged not to be a seismic issue. A general CR has been initiated for this purpose (CR 516327).4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5 .Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEI U0 N/AEl YO NEI UI] NIAE]YE] NEI UF- N/AO YE NE UE N/AONEI U11 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 72 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YZ NO UEJ SeismicWalkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No: 2P41-C002 Equip. Class§6 Equipment Description PSW STANDBY PUMP 1B DIESEL Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free' fromu imPact by nearby equiimenet .or ~structures?::

YEK NQ ULJ N/AD 8. Are, overhead equipment, distributiorn.systems, ceiling' tiles and lighting, YtWN D UD N/Al and masonrybblock walls not likelyto collapse onto the equipment?

9,. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evalUations,is equipmentfree, of potentiaiiy adverse seismic interaction, effects?YS ND UD N/AU.Y0 NO UO Other.Adverse Coinditions II., Have you loked for and foundno other seismic conditions that could. YtR .ND U--adversely:affecf the safety~funetions of the equipment?

Comments (dditional may be addWd as necessary)

Note: For area walk-by see AWC for Intake El.I 11', Pump Room Date: 9/12/2012 Page 73 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-C002 Equip. Class" 6 Equipment Description PSW STANDBY PUMP 1B DIESEL NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YM NO] U-Photographs Page 74 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 75 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 7 Status: YN N] U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO42A Equip. Class' 7T Equipment Description RBSWS 2T41BOOIA CNTRL AOV Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 1W9'-8" Room, Area SW Diagonal Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be. used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] NID/of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline Component 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YEI NEI U[- N/AN YEI NEI Uj' N/AN 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UE- N/AZ 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/AN YZ NEI U]'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 76 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: Y[ NEI U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO42A Equip. Class t 7 Equipment Description RBSWS 2T41BO01A CNTRL AOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft,targets free from, impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NEI UE3 N/A[]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UE N/AE]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ NEI UE3 N/AE Y0 NO UE-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is a lot of surface corrosion on the cooling water pipe at the Valve location.

This surface corrosion is likely due to condensation on the pipe surface. The condensation, is caused by the lack of insulation on this cooling water pipe (See Figures 3 and 4). The SWE's have determined that this corrosion is mild and only affects the surface and will not have a significant effect on the seismic capacity of the pipe at this location.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Page 77 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 7 Status: YM NE U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO42A Equip. Class 1 7 Equipment Description RBSWS 2T4IBOOIA CNTRL AOV Evaluated by: John McFarlan Jeff Horton .Date: 09/24/2012 09/2412012 Page 78 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO42A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description RBSWS 2T41BOO1A CNTRL AOV NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Status: YX NE] U[]Photographs Figure 1 Equipment ID: 2P41-F042A Page 79 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Figure 2 Picture of Component Page 80 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Figure 3: Surface Corrosion on Pipe at Valve Page 81 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Figure 4: Additional Surface Corrosion on Cooling Water Pipe near Valve Location Page 82 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet, 1 of 6 Status: YZ Nn UII]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO39A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description RHR/CS R2T41-BOO3A CNTL VALVE Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 120 Room, Area NE Diagonal Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline Component Air operated valve 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic: conditions?

YOINN YEI NE UI'I NWAS YE- NE U0 N/AZ YEI NO] UF] N/AZ YEI NEI U-] NIAZ YZ NE UE]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 83 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YM Nn-l U'-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID NO. 2P41-FO39A Equip. Class, Equipment Description RHURCS R2T41-BOO3A CNTL V AL VE Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from, impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Valve Air operator is within approximately 3/8" of an overhead pipe's thermal insulation.

The pipe that the valve is installed on is rigidly supported.

Also, the pipe over the valve operator is rigidly supported.

There will be little differential movement.

between the pipe and the valve operator.

Therefore, the SWE's have determined that this configuration is seismically acceptable.

This condition is also discussed in .SEWS package 2P41-FO39A, Dated 2/16/94 and found to: be acceptable.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?.10. Based on the, above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZ Nil UE" N/Ai YZ NO U-] N/Al Y0 NO] U' N/Ai Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NEI UE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as: necessary)

Area Walk-By performed for Component 2T41-NO21A.

Page 84 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-F039A Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description RHR/CS R2T41-BOO3A CNTL VALVE NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YM NE-- ur]Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Horton Date: 09/24/2012 09/24/2012.

Page 85 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-F039A

-Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description RHR/CS R2T41-B003A CNTL VALVE NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YN NEIt UtO]Photographs Figure 1 Component ID: 2P41-F039 Page 86 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Figure 2 Picture Showing Distance between Operator and Pipe Page 87 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 3 Picture Showing Clearance between Operator and Pipe Other Side Page 88 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YM Nil] U[l3 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO35B Equip. Class27 Equipment Description RBSWS 2T41B005B CNTL AOV Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 96 Room, Area Unit 2 HPCI Room Cooler Platform Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following .questions may be used to record the results of judgments.and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist fordocumenting other comments.Anchoragfe

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YEI NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Equipment is line-mounted, so it does not have anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent withplant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%. for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NE U- N/AZ YE] NE UE N/AN YE[ NEI UE N/A0 YEI NE UE' N/AN YU NEI U0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 89 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NE-- U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO35B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description RBSWS 2T41BO05B CNTL AOV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

The valve operator is touching the insulation of an adjacent 3/" pipe.There is sufficient space between the actual pipe and the Valve actuator to preclude contact between them. During a seismic event, it isjudged that, due to the pipe supports in the area and the presence of the insulation, the contact between the valve and the pipe will not be significant and is therefore not a potentially adverse seismic condition.

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE9 N[- U0I N/AEJ YZ NE] UEJ N/AE]YN NiO UI1 N/AE]YNLNr-] UE]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI U0]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There is mild surface oxidation on the attachment bolts between the valve bonnet and the valve body. Since oxidation is only on the surface, the bolts are not. degraded.

Therefore, judged not to be a concern.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Horton Date.: 09/11/2012 09/11/2012 Page 90 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-FO35B Equip. C Equipment Description RBSWS 2T41BO05B CNTL NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ N-] U[-]AOV Phot, Figure I -Equipment ID No (2P41-F035B)

Page 91 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Figure 2 -Equipment Elevation (2P41-F03514)

Page 92 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Figure 3 Contact between Valve and Pipe (2P4I-F035B)

Page 93 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 4 -Connection Bolt Oxidation (2P4 1-F035B)Page 94 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: Y] ND U[-Equipment ID No. 2T41-FOO4A Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description SPT FL PL TO REF FL AOV Location:

Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 203 Room, Area RH-R15 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be, used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments..

Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YE0 N 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?Equipment is line-mounted equipment, so it does not have anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations,.is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NI. UE3 N/AN YEIT NI. UI" NWAS YEIT NiO UI] N/AN YE-1 NrI Ui- N/A2J YE Ni UE]rEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 95 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2T411FOO4A Equip., Equipment Description SPT FL PL TO REF FL A0 NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ NO] U[-'V Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0 NEI UE] N/AE-Y0 N[-] UEI N/AC]Y0 NEI U] N/AE]YN] NEU]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN N- UIE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Mild surface oxidation present onflange bolts. Since oxidation is only on the surface, the bolts are not degraded.

Therefore, the bolts are judged not to be a seismic concern.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See Component 2G41-FO54 for Area Walk-by Checklist.

Evaluated by: John McFarland Jeff Horton Date: 09/25/2012 09/25/2012 Page 96 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y[ N-] UM]Equipment ID No. 2T41-FOO4A Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SPT FL PL TO REF FL AOV Photographs Figure I -Equipment ID No (2T41-FO04A)

Page 97 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 -Equipment Elevation (2T4 I-FOO4A)Page 98 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 -Mild Oxidation on Flange Bolts (2T41-F004A)

Page 99 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y] NEI U[]Equipment ID No. 2T46-F003B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SBGT;RF 18"150# BF AOV Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 203 Room, Area SBGT Filter Train Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing

%Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space isprovided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline item.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEr NO YE] NEI UiI N/A0 YE- NEI UV N/AZ YEI NEI UiI N/AZ YEI NEI UVi N/AZNEI UE I Enter the.equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 100 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[-] U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2T46-FOO3B0 Equip. Class, 7 Equipment Description SBGT RF 18"150# BF AOV Interaction Effects.7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NO UE' N/AZ 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NE UI N/AnZ and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI NEI UE' N/A" YZ NO U[: Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked forand found no other seismic conditions that could YE) NEI UE3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.MOP Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI*WESLEY WILLIAMS .Date: 9/1112012 9/11/2012 WESLEY WILLIAMS Page 101 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ NM U--Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2T46-FO03B Equip. Class' 7 Equipment Description SBGT RF 18"150# BF AOV Photographs Page 102 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YN NEI uV Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-FO04 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HPCI PUMP SUCTION FROM CST (MOV)Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment On the SWEL. The space below each ofthefollowing questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrments and findings.

Additional space is-provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline Item 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the:concrete nearthe anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification, is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NO YE NEI UE- N/AZ YEI NEI UE- N/AO YEI NE UE1 N/AO YEI NEI UE- N/AZ YO NEI UO Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 103 of 394

.ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4.Status: Y2 Nn U[]Seismic, Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-F004 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description HPCI PUMP SUCTION FROM CST (MOO Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ Nil UI- N/Al-]8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN N[] UI-I N/AE'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YI NFI U'I N/AE]YN NEI U-]Other Adverse Conditions 11 ., Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 NEl Uil adversely affectthe safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additionalpages may be added as necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for 2E21-CO0 lB.Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI WESLEY WILLIAMS Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 104 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-F004 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HPCI PUMP SUCTION FROM CST (MOV)NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YX Nn] U[]Photographs Page 105 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 106 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[ NE] UE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment 1D No. 2E41-FOCI Equip. Class' 8 ......Equipment Description HPCI TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VLV (MOV)Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline item.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y-] NZ YEI Ni- UE- N/A.s YEI NEI U[] N/AS Y[1 NF1 UE[ N/AZ YO NO UF- N/A0 YZ NEI UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 107 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: Y[ NE- UD-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-FOO1 Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description HPCI TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VLV (MOV)Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

The overhead crane was evaluated during SQUG walkdowns for the item in this room (2E41-C002) and found to be seismically adequate.YZ NDl U-1 N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0 NR UD] N/A[D and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y0I ND UD- N/AD-Y21 Nr-D UF-Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NDý UD1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walkby was performed within the package for 2E21-COOIB.

4ý1 9JaAAI Evaluated by: KURSA T KINALI WESLEY WILLIAMS/Date: 9/24/2012 9/24/2012 Page 108 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ NO U[i Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E41-FO01 Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description HPCI TURBINE STEAM SUPPLY VLV (MOV)Photographs Page 109 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 110 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: Yt N-] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-F315A Equip. Class 1 8 Equipment Description PSW RX BLDG DIV 1 ISOL VLV A Location:

Bldg. YARD Floor El. 117 Room, Area Unit 2 Div. I pit Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optionall but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Inline item.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing. or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEI NN YEI NE UE1 N/A YE NE UE' N/AN YE NEI UE] N/AZ YEI NEI UE- N/AN YN NE UE Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B:, Classes of Equipment Page 111 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y1 NE] U[i]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-F315A Equip. Class Equipment Description PSW RX BLDG DIV 1/ISQL VU~A Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NEI UC N/AC 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YIZ NEI UC N/AC]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines, have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on theabove seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NC' UC N/AC YZ NO UC Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have: you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NCl UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Surface corrosion was observed on the pipe flange however this is judged as not a potentially adverse seismic condition by the SWEs.Evaluated by: KURSALT KINA JOHN MCFARLAND Date; 9/2712012.

9/2712012 Page 112 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2P41-F315A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description PSW RX BLDG DIV 1 ISOL VLV A NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YM NE[] U]-Photographs Page 113 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet.1 of 3 Status:: YZ N[] U[-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-F042A

.Equip. Class" 8 Equipment Description DIESEL AIR START SOLENOID VLV Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. J30 Room, Area 2A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i~e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

INLINE ITEM 2. Is the anchorage free of bent,. broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is. the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an, anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YEi NO YE NE0 U- N/A9 YEI NEI UEI N/A!YO NEI U-I N/AI: YE] NEI UE N/AR YZ NEI UEi 1.Enter the equipment class name from AppendixB:

Classes of Equipment.

Page 114 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-FO42A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description DIESEL AIR START SOLENOID VLV Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YZ NIl UI-I N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yl NEI U- N/AI and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free, of potentially adverse seismic. interaction effects?Y9 NI] UE] N/An Y I NI U-1 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions.that could YI NI] U'I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (AdditionaI pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk by was performed with item 2R43-SOOIA.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date: 9/7/2012 V ~/Y~/917/2012 Weslev s Page 115 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2R43-FO42A Equip. Class, Equipment Description DIESEL AIR START SOLENOID NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ N[] U[:]VLV Photographs Photographs Page 116 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1.of 7 Status: ) uL Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E1 1-FOO4A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Torus Suction Valve (MOV)Location:

Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area NE Diagonal Manufacturer,.Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below~each of the following questions may be used to record the results. ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1, Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE] NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring suchverification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?:

This equipment is an inline component, so there is no anchorage.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is. more than mild surface oxidation?

YE] NEI UE] N/AZ YE] NE] UE] N/AN 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE] NE] UiE] N/AO 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only appliesif the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE] UE] N/AZ YE NEI U0 I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 117 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 7 Status: )A NN U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E1 1-FOO4A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description Torus Suction Valve (MOVJ Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structUres?

The operator for the valve is seated on the grating above the valve support with.between 0 " and I " of space along the valve edge (CR 525108). Any seismic movement of the valve operator will cause.impact between the motor operator and the platform grating (See Figures 1, 2, and 3). The grating is consideredflexibl compared to the.valve operator and Valve stem. So damage of the valve is unlikely.

But having safety related valve operators this close to building structures is no seismically acceptable.

Therefore, removal of the grating such that a minimum of 1" spacing is clear around the surface of the operator 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The tube track supporting one of the flex conduits attached to the valve has four holes for screws at the edge of the tube track that do not have screws in them. It appears that the holes were for a section of track that was later removed or never installed, so there are no missing screws. The track is adequately supported, so there is no potentially adverse seismic condition.

9. Do: attached lines have. adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Ul-] N/AD]YN NEIIJU YS NO UI YZ NO UEI N/AO IN:Al]OtherAdverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO U-]adversely affect the safety functions-of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages maybe added as necessary)

None Evaluated by:.John McFarland.Jaff Date: 09/24/2012 09/'24/2012

____-1 177 Page 118 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 2E1 1-FOO4A Equip. Class, Equipment Description Torus Suction Valve (MOV)Sheet 3 of 7 Status: U--]9h8 Photographs Figure 1 -Equipment ID No (2El I-FO04A)Page 119 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 7 Figure 2 -Equipment Elevation (2El 1-F004A)Page 120 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 7 Figure 3 -Spacing Between Valve Operator and Grating (2E1 I-FO04A)Page 121 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 7 Figure 4 -Spacing Between Valve Operator and Grating (2EI 1-FO04A)Page 122 of 394 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 7 of 7 Figure 5 -Empty Tube Track Holes (2E1 I-FO04A)Page 123 of 394

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-12-2269,_SNCH082-RPT-02,_Ver._1.0,_Edwin_I._Hatch,_Unit_2_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Task_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic,_Part_3_of_11&oldid=908683"