ML12356A409

SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0, Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 2 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 11 of 11

ML12356A409
Person / Time
Site:	Hatch
Issue date:	11/26/2012
From:	Stewart W Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2269 SNCH082-RPT-02, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12356A409 (79)

Text

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet ] of 3 Status: Y0] NO U[-I Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area, NW Diagonal Elevated Plafform Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By, near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening:cabinets)?

Equipment 2T41-BO04B has a missing bolt. See picture for details. CR523718 has been initiated for this purpose.

YE NZ UE' N/AE3

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U, N/AE degraded conditions?

3. Based: on a visual inspection from the floor, dolthe cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill, conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NEI UE N/AD

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Ys NE UE N/AIE-interactions with other equipment.in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large:(e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 131 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 status: YE] No u[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area' NW Diagonal Elevated Platform

5. Does itappear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI U-- N/AEj interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable

.equipment, and temporary installations (e.g,, scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NEI UEl N/AOl YR NEI UE3 N/AMl

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

IYN NEI UC Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date; 9/25/2012 Wesley Williams 9/25/2012 Page 132 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[-] NCK U[M]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Areal NW Diagonal Elevated Platform Photographs Page 133 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 5 Status: YN N[-] U[

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area' SWITCHGEAR ROOM 2G Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following, questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free Of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YZ Ni] UEL N/AE]

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y2 NEI UF] NIAI]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual irispection from the.floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adyerse seismic conditions, (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Two cases were observed where conduit spans appeared to be longer than standard practice (see pictures 1 and 2). However, those spans were judged to meet the intent of section 8.0 of the SQUG GIP which allows spans of 20 feet for conduits of this size. Thus, the conduits are seismically adequate.

Conduits 3" and larger are seismically acceptable when the vertical spacing is less than 20 feet (section 8.2.2, SQUG GIP).

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse, seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

YZ NEI UI[] N/AI]

YZ NI] Ui] N/AI]

YN NI] UI] NIAI]

IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described, This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 134 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ Nn-U[:]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area' SWITCHGEAR ROOM 2G

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that cOuld cause a fire in thearea?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NCi U0 N/AU YZ NEI U-" N/AU

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic, conditions that could YZ NEI UU-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Distribution panels 2R25-SO06 and 2R25-SO31 have a screw missing in the front panel. CR #515500 was written to add a screw to panel 2R25-S006 and CR # 515506 was written to add a screw to panel 2R25-S031.

Timer panel 2H2 1-P305 had 5 missing slip connectors to keep the door of the cabinet closed. DOEJ-HX-35281-COO1 "Evaluate Capacity of 4 Screws to Hold Door in Place" addressed this condition and it has been determined tobe adequate in a seismic event. CR #516713 has been written to resolve this. issue.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary),

Several cable trays exhibited warping on the bottom portion of the tray where the cables are supported. It was judged to be seisimically adequate since the warping does not impact the overall structural integrity or siesmic response of the cable tray. See picture 2.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcava Date: 09/06/20012 Patrick Kelly (5

09/06/2012 Page 135 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NE-U--

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area' SWITCHGEAR ROOM 2G Photographs

/ Conduit 2E23664 1: Unsupported Conduit 2E23664 (Switchgear Room 2G)

Page 136 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Conduit 2E23472,

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 2: Unsupported Conduit 2E23472 (Switchgear Room 2G)

Page 137 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 5

3: Timer Panel 2H21-P305 Missing Connectors (Switchgear Room 2G)

Page 138 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 6 Status: YZ N-' UM Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area' 2R103 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

I. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic.conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

A steel base plate for a column conduit support near airlock 2R106 has two anchors with nuts not fully tightened (see photograph 1). There is approximately a 1/8" gap between the bottom of the nuts and the top of the plate. Deflections will increase slightly due to this, though the support is judged to be seismically adequate as the anchors are embedded in the concrete and will resist the tension forces experienced during an event as intended. CR 519997 has been written to resolve this issue.

There is a cantilevered frame supporting a circular duct on the west wall missing an anchor bolt (see photograph 2). The adjacent support has all three anchors though the top and bottom anchors are missing washers. The two anchors present allow for the tension/compression action to occur in the event of movement during a seismic event. The duct weight isn't significant overthe span observed to be supported and the support is judged to be seismically adequate. CR 5.19729 has been written to install the missing anchor and washers.

There is a missing anchor on the south support for 2H21-P008 along the west wall (see photograph 3). It is judged to be seismically adequate as the two anchors provide enough strength to resist overturning of the equipment during a seismic event. CR 519996 has been written to reinstall the missing anchor.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

3. Based on. a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable traysý appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?'

YZ NQ UE' N/AF YO NEI U0 N/AO Y2I NEI UU N/AU1 Y9 NEI UU N/AU-1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large:(e~g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 139 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: YZ NEI U-l]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area' 2R103

5. Does it appearthat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

There is a pair of loose pliers underneath 2H2 1 -P008 along the west wall (see photograph, 3). This is not a seismic concern. CR 519996 has been written to remove the pliers.

YI NEI UI0 N/AE]

YO NO] UOL N/A-YZ NEO UE] N/AE]

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NE] UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

There is a missing bolt on the east side of the large enclosure that houses both 2H21-P1 73 and 2C82-P00 1 (see photograph 4). There are enough bolts present to provide enough strength to keep the enclosure together during a seismic event. It is judged to be seismically adequate.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Date: 09/1812012 09/18/2012 Page 140 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YZ N["] UF]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area, 2R103 Photographs 1: Nuts Not Fully Tightened for Conduit Column Support (2R103)

Page 141 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Z: Missmg Anchor lor cantilever Nupport U11 West Wall (ZK lKI)

Page 142 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 3: Missing Anchor for 2H21-P008 and Pliers Not Stored Properly (2R 103)

Page 143 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

.6 of 6 4: Missing Bolt to Enclosure for 2H21-P173 and 2C82-POO1 (2R 103)

Page 144 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 sStatus: Y[K N[] U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 97 Room, Area" NE Diagonal Unit, 2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of'judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

There is one anchor bolt missing from a two-bolt support for the tubing near valve 2E11-F252A. Figure 1 shows a weld along the edge of the base-plate closest to the location of the missing anchor bolt. This weld will carry the load that would be carried by the missing anchor. Therefore, the support is seismically acceptable.

Y[R NO UCI N/AlO

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NE] U-] N/AL]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NEI UL-N/AL]

4. Does it appear thatthe area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] U--] N/AL]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g:,Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described, This selected areashould be based on judgment, e.g,, on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 145 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 sStatus: Y[

NFE-UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 97 Room, Area' NE Diagonal Unit 2

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YN NEI ULJ N/AZ YN NI U-I N/A' YZ NE U[-] N/A[']

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE UZ adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John: McFarland Date: 09/12/2012 Jeff Horton -

09/12/2012 Page 146 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[

N[] U0-Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 97 Room, Area1 NE Diagonal Unit 2 Photographs Figure 1 - Tubing Support Missing Bolt (NE Diagonal Unit 2)

Page 147 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y[* Nil] UQh]

Area Walk-By* Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 106 Room, Area, NE Diagonal Unit 2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document theresults of the, Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does~anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN Nn UI-N/All

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ N[l] U0] N/AL]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YZ NEl Url N/AL3 YN NEL UL] N/AL]

' If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 148 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 106 Room, Area' NE Diagional Unit 2

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6.. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic

.interactions that could cause a.fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially-adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NO UD-N/AD YN NO UDI N/AD YIZ NO UD' N/AD-

8. Have you looked for and found no other ýseismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

YO NOU0 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarla..

Date:: 09/12t2012 Jeff Horton 09/12/2012 Page 149 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[

NE] U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 106 Room, Area. NE Diagonal Unit 2 Photographs N/A Page 150 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: Y[E NEI U[-

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 97 Room, Area' SE Diagonal Unit 2 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Y9 NI! U!] N/AL

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NC] U[] N/AL]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a'visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e~g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

Y0 NEI U!] N/AL]

Y[

NL] UiL N/AL]

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about.85 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 151 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN N[-] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 97 Room, Area' SE Diagonal Unit 2

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause afire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse: seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Y0 NE UE-N/AU3 YZ NE UE-N/AU1 YZ NEI Ui N/AO

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

There are two loose items behind the 2E1i-BOO1B Heat Exchanger: a small plastic nozzle and a piece offoam insulation that has become dislodged from around a valve. Both items are small and light; and are not near any sensitive equipment. Therefore, the items are judged to not be a potentially adverse seismic condition, Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/1212012 Jeff Horto 09/12/2012 Page 152 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[

N[-] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 97 Room, Area1 SE Diagonal Unit 2 Photb Figure 1 - Loose Pipe Insulation (SE Diagonal Unit 2)

Page 153 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Figure 2 - Loose Plastic Nozzle (SE Diagonal Unit 2)

Page 154 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4, Status: YN NM U[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 130 Room, Area' Unit 2 Nitrogen Storage Tank Room Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Oxygen Analyzer on the wall (2T48-R075) has 2 of the 4 bolts missing.

Oxygen Analyzer on the wall (2T48-RO76) has I of the 4, bolts missing.

These items are rather light weight and SWEs judged these supports to be seismically adequate, however, CR525168 was initiated to replace these missing bolts.

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded conditions?

Some surface corrosion on the nearby pipe supports was observed.

These were judged to be seismically adequate by SWEs due to very light loads. However, CR525163 was initiated for this purpose to cover the corrosion issue in the area.

3. Based on a -visual inspection from the floor; do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YZ NO U-N/ALl YZ NEI U['- N/Al Y[

Ni UL" N/AO"

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial Y0 NO U, N/ALE interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), thearea selected should bedescribed.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the. order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 155 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN Nfj ur-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 130 Room, Area1 Unit 2 Nitrogen Storage Tank Room

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does: it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does: it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic

.interactions associated with housekeeping. practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NEI UI-I N/A-J Y0 NI UI-I N/A-I Y[

NEI-ULI N/AD

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y0 Nil UE' adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Nitrogen tank vaporizer anchored to floor nearby was judged okay by SWEs. Its, anchors have mild surface corrosion but this is judged not to be a seismic concern.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date: 9126/2012 Wesley Williams 9/26/2012 Page 156 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[

N]

U[-]

Location: Bldg. YARD Floor El. 130 Room, Area' Unit 2 Nitrogen Storage Tank Room Photographs Page 157 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 158 of 186

I ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet. I of 3 Status: YM NEI U-'

Area Walk-By Checklist(AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area2 Day Tank Room Instructions for Completing. Checklist This checklist may be used.to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The spacebelow each of the following questions may be used. to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening'cabinets)?

Y0 NEI U0 N/AEl

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant YZ NEI UE N/A1l degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4.. Does it appear. that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

YS NEI UEJ N/AU Y0 NEI U'

N/AU3 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 159 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y[

N[] U[-]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area, Day Tank Room

5. Does itappear that the area. is free of potentially adverse seismic YER NEI UF-] N/AU interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Y* Ni Ur-N/AU" YE NEI UU-N/AU

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ NUI UUI adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date: 9/12/2012 Wesley Williams t

64 9/1212012 Page 160 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y[

NM-] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area. Day Tank Room Photographs None.

Page 161 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y21 N[] U-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 203 Room, Area' 2R414 (RH-R18 to south wall)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results, ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for-documenting other comments..

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YN NEI U-N/AU

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y10 NO U-N/AU degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial.

interactions with other equipment, in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The lights in the vicinity have hooks which are not fully closed.

However, they have lock plugs which: will prevent the fall of these lights, Therefore, they are judged as seismically adequate. However, a CR has been initiated to provide ties to restrain the lights better (CR513069).

YE NEI UU N/AU YI NEI U-N/AU IIf the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected, area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 162 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y0 NEI uI Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 203 Room, Areal 2R414 (RH-R18 to south wall)

5. Does it appear that the area is :free of potentially adverse seismic YN NEI UE] N/A-interactions that could cause floodingor spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause afire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NEI UE-N/AU1 YN NEI UE N/AU 8, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ui adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: Kursat Kinali Date; 9/6/2012 Wesley Williams 9/6/20 12 Page 163 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YX N[-] U]

Location: Bldg. RB Floor El. 203 Room, Area1 2R414 (RH-RI8 to south wall)

Photographs Page 164 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YN NR-Uf-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El,. 130' Room, Area' CRD Hydraulic Unit Area Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By nearone or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this, checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

YZ NO] Ut' N/At]

.2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0D Nt-U[- N/A[]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill

.conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Y19 N[I Ut] N/AO

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YN NEI Ut] N/AL]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceilingtiles and lighting)?

1 If the room in which the SWEL item is located is.very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected shouldbe described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 165 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ NL-- U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 130' Room, Area, CGR HYdraulic Unit Area 5.. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NOI U'- N/AOI YN NEI UO] N/Ar YE NEI UE1 N/AEl

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

YZ NFIUO Comments (Additional. pages may be added as necessary)

SWE's noticed a frayed wire which appears to be a Fire detection wire The location of this wire is above the Hear here booth in the south-west comer of the 130' elevation of the Reactor Building (See CR-4-&-5). This is not a seismic issue.

Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09117/2012 Jeff Horton 09/17/2012 Page 166 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YE NEI UD Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 130' Room, Area' CRD Hydraulic Unit Area Photographs:

Figure 1 Frayed Wire Page 167 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: Y[

NEI U0 Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 164 Room, Area' Unit 2 Control Room Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end-of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment..in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

Visible anchors ofadjacent cabinets were found to be properly installed and in accordance with the typical configuration.

YZ NLI UII N/AE!

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0 NO UL] N/Al]

degraded conditions?

3. Based on avisual inspection from the floor, do the. cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

Ladder was used and permission was obtained to view area above the the hung ceiling. The ceiling was rod hung and tied into: rigid structures. HVAC and electrical components in the overhead were properly restrained. See 2-HII-P602 SWC for more details.

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceilingtiles and lighting)?

Unlatched lighting covers were observed at three locations at the rear of the panels. This is not a seismic concern as discussed in the 2-H1 1-P602 SWC.

YS NEl UL] N/AL]

YZ NL] UL] N/AL]

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e~g., on the order of aboutit35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 168 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NEI U[]

Location:. Bldg. Control Floor El. 164 Room, Area' Unit 2. Control Room

5. Does it appear that the area is free of:potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

The Xerox plotter in the area was stored at an appropriate distance

(>2ft) from the panels and cabinet. The wheels were. also locked.

Y9, NO UEl N/A' YS NEIl Ui-N/A-YR NO] U-] N/AE]

8. Have'you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE-UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Winston Stewart.

Date: 9/18/2012 Kursat Kinali 9/18/2012 Page 169 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[* N[- UW"'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Control Floor El. 164 Room, Area' Unit 2 Control Room Photographs Page 170 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Page 171 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 4 Status: YN NZ1 UL-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: 'Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 203 Room, Area' RH-R18 Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.,

Additional space is provided atthe end of this Checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does. anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of Y0 NO UC] N/A-potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant Y0R N U'- N/AE1 degraded conditions?

There is evidence of a'water leak behind several of the base plates on the wall at R14. There is some mild corrosion of the bolts and base plates due to the leak, but the rust stains on the walls indicate that the corrosion ismild. Since oxidation is only on the surface, the anchors are not degraded. Therefore, the anchors are judged not be a seismic concern.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit Y0 NE UE3 N/AEI raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition. of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

4., Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial YZ NE] UEl N/AE]

interactions with other equipment in the area (e~g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

The suspended light above safety-related AOV 2G41-F054 on the 203' elevation of the Unit 2 Reactor Building is hung with an open hook and is not safety-wired to the supporting steel. During a seismic event, it is possible that the light will become dislodged from the hook. The light is powered with a twist lock connection, which will restrain the light in the event ofa fall. Therefore, it isjudged to not be a potentially adverse seismic condition.

'If the room in which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment,'e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 172 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YE NO u[]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location! Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 203 Room, Area' RH-R18

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area, is free.of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

Y0 NEil UEi N/AU YZ NE UE3 N/A[

YN NEI" U] N/AU"

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

Y0 N[3U3 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None; Evaluated by: John McFarla nd Date: 09/12/2012 Jeff Horton 09/12/2012 Page 173 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: YZ N"-1] Ur]

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 203 Room, Area, RH-R18 Photog~raphs Figure 1 - Surface Corrosion behind Base Plates (RH-R 18 Unit 2)

Page 174 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 Figure 2 - Suspended Light over Valve (RH-R18 Unit 2)

Page 175 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 6 Status: Y; NM UM-]

Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 87' Room, Area, Torus Room Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Area Walk-By near one or more SWEL items.. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

1. Does anchorage of equipment.in the area appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (if visible without necessarily opening cabinets)?

2.. Does anchorage of equipment in the area appear to be free of significant degraded' conditions?

There is a four bolt base plate vertical support for a small bore air supply pipe running to 2E51-F003 that is missing one anchor bolt on the 87' elevation in Bay 10 of the Torus Room. This support is approximately 2 feet off the floor and it supports the end, of the rigid pipe. The remainingportion of this system is flex hose to 2EB51-F003 (See Figure 2). There is a similar support a short distance away-that is

'intact. The pipe is well supported on the wall by its attachment to2P52-A 001. The support does not carry a large load and at this elevation would not see a significant seismic acceleration. Therefore, the SWE's have determined that the, base-plate configuration is seismically acceptable. This bolt does not need to be installed.

3. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/conduit raceways and HVAC ducting appear to be free of potentially adverse seismic conditions (e.g., condition of supports is adequate and fill conditions of cable trays appear to be inside acceptable limits)?

YS NEt U-N/ALE YZ NEI UE N/AE]

YIN NE U' N/AE]

If the room in~which the SWEL item is located is very large (e.g., Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on judgment, e.g., on the order of about 35 feet from the SWEL item.

Page 176 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Y[E N[-1 U[-'

Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 87' Room, Area1 Torus Room

4. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and lighting)?

5. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause flooding or spray in the area?

6. Does: it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions that could cause. a fire in the area?

7. Does it appear that the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions associated with housekeeping practices, storage of portable

,equipment, and temporary installations (e.g., scaffolding, lead shielding)?

YZ NEI UCI N/AL]

YZ NE UI-N/AC Y1Z NEI Ul-N/ACI YZ NCI UC-N/AC1

8. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment in the area?

YZ NO U0 Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Page 177 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6 Status: YN NR-URi Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: 'Bldg. Reactor Floor El 87V Room, Area1 Torus Room Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/17/2012 Jeff Horton Page 178 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: Y[

NEI UE-Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. Reactor Floor El. 87' Room, Area1 Torus Room Photographs:

Figure 1 Conduit support in Torus Room Bay 10 with Missing Anchor Note: Picture was taken looking down at the floor.

Page 179 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Figure 2 Showing Air Line to 2ES 1-F003 and supports Support with missing anchor bolt shown in Figure 1 Page 180 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 3 2E5 I-F003 Component that Conduit is connected Page 181 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheetý I of5 Status; 'YM NfJ UP Area Walk-,By Checklist, (AWC)

Location: Bldg'. INTAKE FloorEl'. 1i1.

Room, Area' u

om Instructionsfor Completing Checklist This checklist may, be used to document the. results. of the Area Walk-By near one or. more 'SWEL items.-The space below each of the~fllowing quesiions may be used:to0record the results ofjudgments and findings..

Additional space isprovided.:atth" end of this checklist for documenting.other commentsý.

1. Does anchorage of equipment.in theýarea appear:to be:free.of potentitlly adverse seismic conditiions(if visible withotit necessarily openingcabinets)?

2. Does anchorage of equipment inthe.:area appear to befree of significant degraded tconditions?

Mild commoncorrosion is, present in areas near the pumps and baseplates of the pumps. Some supporting frame: members overhead (channels) also have mild sukface corrosion. These are judged not to be a seismic concern. sincethe corrosion,is only-mild surface corrosion at this time. However, a CR has been initiated (CR516327)lto document this wide spread issue and to take steps to ensure that corrosion will not lead to seismically adverse conditions in the future.

Mild surface corrosion, was found in suction pit. It was judgedpnot to be.

a seismic concern. However, a CR-has been initiated (CR5ý190?4) to document this issue and to monitorand tra ck to ensure any potential future corrosion does. not create an adverse seismic condition.

3,. Based on a visual inspection from the floor, do the cable/Ionduit raceways and 14VAC ducting appear to be free of potentally ades seismic conditions (e.g., condition of suppogts is adequate and filI conditions of cable trays, appear tobe inside acceptable limits)?

4. Does it appear that the areasisfree of potentially adVerse seismic spatial interactions with other equipment in the area (e.g., ceiling tiles and:

lighting)?

Y'[

NDI ULI N/AD

YN NO UED "N/A0

,YZ ND UD1 N/AD YN NDI UD N/AD

'If the room in which te SWEL item is locatedI is very large (e~g.,Turbine Hall), the area selected should be described.

This selected area should be based on jiggment; e*g., on the order of about 35feet from the SWEL item, Page 182 of 186

I ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet-2 0of S Status:.Y NF] bU

.Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El... 1:11 Room, Area, Pump Room 5.. Does it appearthat thearea is free.of potentiallyvadverse seismic:

interactions that coUld cause floodingor spray in the'area?

6. Does it appear t'hat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic:

interactions that could cause afire, in the area?

7. Does it: appeartat the area is free of potentially adverse seismic interactions~associated with housekeeping-practices,.storage. of portable, equipment, and tempdraryyinstallations (eg,, scaffolding,. ead shielding)?

A broken name plate was found in theareta; 2E11-1F2O5C.A CR has been initiat.edtofix `thiý issue (CR519050). It, is: not:a seismic concern.

YN NO UH N/AM Y9 NEI UE] N/Ab YZ NI TUJ N/AEI 8,. Have you looked.for andnd f no other seismic conditions that could YIO NHi UH) adversely affect the safetY functions:ofthe equipment in the area?

Comments (AdditionaI pages may be added as necessary)

None.

Evaluated by: WESLEY WILLIAMS....

Date: 9/12/201-t2 KURSAT KINALl 4

91, 2/2012 Page 183 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS Area Walk-By Checklist (AWC)

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN Nn UnI Location: Bldg. INTAKE Floor El. 111 Room, Area' Puma Room Photographs Page 184 of 186

ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Page 185 of 186

f ATTACHMENT 4: AREA WALK-BY CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Page 186 of 186

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 5 UNIT 2 - IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-02 This attachment contains Appendix H from the report entitled, "Edwin I. Hatch, Unit 1 and Unit 2, Individual Plant Examination of External Events - Seismic" Page 1 of 7

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

SUMMARY

OF IPEEE EQUIPMENT OUTLIERS PLANT HATCH UNIT 2 contains a summary of all Safe Shutdown Equipment List components which require a modification to achive a HCLPF capacity of at least 0.3 g pga.. This appendix contains the following information, sorted by equipment identification number.

Column Heading Equipment Identification Number Equipment Class Equipment Description Equipment Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Modification Status Description Equipment identification number Equipment class (see table 1 of this appendix)

Brief description of equipment Building and elevation where equipment is located Brief description of outliers Brief description of outlier resolution If an outlier is being resolved by a plant modification, this column gives the Design Change Request (DCR) number or states that a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) will be used.

The status of the modification is shown as "pending" or "complete."

Page 2 of 7

ATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 IPEEE EQUIPMENT CLASS DESIGNATIONS Equipment Class (Column 2) 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08A 08B 09 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 Description Motor control centers Low-voltage switchgear Medium-voltage switchgear Transformers Horizontal Pumps Vertical pumps Fluid-operated valves Motor-operated valves Solenoid-operated valves Fans Air handlers Chillers Air compressors Motor generators Distribution panels Batteries on racks Battery chargers and inverters Engine generators Instruments on racks Temperature sensors Instrumentation and control panels and cabinets Tanks and heat exchangers

• This page is retyped from the original IPEEE Equipment Class designations Page 3 of 7

AATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION 0

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 Equipment Equipment Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status 2El 1-C002B 06 RHR pump 2B Reactor Building Potential interaction with adjacent beam.

Trim beam flange to provide Completed el 87 ft adequate clearance.

07/24/1996 DCR 94-017 2H1 l-P601 20 Control room panel Control Building Potential interaction from HVAC Restrain diffuser.

Completed 2H11-P606 el 164 ft diffuser in ceiling.

07/24/1996 2H1 1-P614 DCR 94-017 2H1 1-P652 2H1-1 -P602 20 Control room panel Control Building

1. Potential interaction from HVAC

1. Restrain diffuser.

1. Completed 2H11-P650 el 164 ft diffuser in ceiling.

07/24/1996

2. Potential interaction from nearby

2. Remove or restrain DCR 94-017 furniture, furniture.

2.Pending MWO 2H1-1-P603 20 Control room panel Control Building Potential interaction from nearby Remove or restrain furniture.

Pending el 164 ft furniture.

MWO 2H11-P609 20 Control room panel Control Building

1. Potential interaction from HVAC

1. Restrain diffuser.

1. Completed el 164 ft diffuser in ceiling.

07/24/1996

2. Loose cable in panel could potentially

2. Restrain cable.

DCR 94-017 impact relays.

2.Pending MWO 2H1 1-P611 20 Control room panel Control Building Broken door latch could cause door to Repair or replace door latch.

Pending el 164 ft rattle.

MWO 2H1 l-P612 20 Control room panel Control Building Instruments on slides not restrained.

Repair or replace retaining Pending 2H11-P613 el 164 ft clips.

MWO 2H1 1-P622 20 Control room panel Control Building

1. Potential interaction from HVAC

1. Restrain diffuser.

1. Completed el 164 ft diffuser in ceiling.

07/24/1996

2. Gap under panel could potentially

2. Install shims or grout DCR 94-017 cause relay chatter.

under panel.

2.Pending I _I V

MO Page 4 of 7

9 ACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO, SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION.0 Equipment Equipment Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status 2H1 1-P656 20 Control room panel Control Building Potential interaction from adjacent panel Modify panel 2H1 1-P663 Completed el 164 ft 2H11-P663 which is supported on anchorage.

07/24/1996 isolators.

DCR 94-017 2H11-P664 20 Control room panel Control Building

1. Potential interaction from materials

1. Remove or restrain

1. Pending el 164 ft stored near panel.

materials.

MWO

2. Relay has cracked case and missing

2. Repair or replace relay.

2. Pending retainer clips.

MWO

3. Anchorage and load path do not meet

3. Modify anchorage.

3. Completed GIP screening criteria.

07/24/1996 DCR 94-017 2HI 1-P670 20 Control room panel Control Building Anchorage and load path for these panels Modify anchorage for panels Completed 2HI 1-P671 el 164 ft does not meet GIP screening criteria.

2H11-P670 through 07/24/1996 2HI 1-P672 Panels 2H1I1-P674, P675, and P679 are 2H11-P679.

DCR 94-017 2H1 1-P673 on the SSEL; panels P670, P67 1, P672, 2H11-P674 P673, P676, P677, and P678 are not on 2H11 -P675 the SSEL but could potentially impact 2H1 1-P676 other SSEL panels.

2H 11-P677 2H11-P678 2H11-P679 2H11-P691 20 Control room panel Control Building SRT could not confirm that equipment Modify anchorage or add Completed 2HI I-P700 el 164 ft pad has reinforcing and adequate load brace at top of panel.

07/24/1996 path to the floor slab.

DCR 94-017 2H21-P200 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator

1. Potential impact with adjacent panel

1. Connect panels and MCC

1. Completed panel Building el 130 ft and MCC not bolted together.

together to prevent 05/16/1994

2. Potential interaction from overhead impact.

DCR light fixture.

2. Tie up light fixture 91-145 to prevent falling.

2. Completed 10/11/1991 DCR 90-10 Page 5 of 7

ACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION.0 Equipment Equipment Equipment Equipment Modification ID Number Class Description Location Outlier Description Outlier Resolution Status 2H21-P202 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator Potential impact with adjacent panel and Connect panels and MCC Completed panel Building el 130 ft MCC not bolted together.

together to prevent impact.

05/16/1994 DCR 91-144 2H21-P230 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator

1. Relays mounted on flexible plate

1. Modify or replace

1. Completed panel Building el 130 ft inside panel could potentially cause mounting plate.

07/24/1996 relay chatter.

2. Tie up light fixture to DCR

2. Potential interaction from overhead prevent falling.94-017.

light fixture.

2. Completed 10/11/1991 DCR 90-10 2H21-P231 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator Relays mounted on flexible plate inside Modify or replace mounting Completed panel Building el 130 ft panel could potentially cause relay plate.

07/24/1996 chatter.

DCR 94-017 2H21-P232 20 Diesel generator relay Diesel Generator

1. Potential impact with adjacent panel

1. Connect panels together

1. Completed panel Building el 130 ft not bolted together.

to prevent impact.

05/16/1994 DCR

2. Relays mounted on flexible plate.

2. Modify or replace 91-144 inside panel could potentially cause mounting plate.

2. Completed relay chatter.

07/24/1996 DCR 94-017 2P41-N303A 18 PSW discharge pressure Intake structure Excessive corrosion on base plate and Modify base plate and Completed 2P41-N303B transmitter valve pit el 88 ft anchor bolts.

anchorage.

07/24/1996 DCR 94-017 2R22-S005 0 3

4160V station service Diesel Generator

1. Inadequate load path.

1. Install additional

1. Completed switchgear Building el 130 ft anchorage.

07/24/1996 DCR

2. Potential interaction from overhead

2. Tie up light fixture to 94-017 light fixture.

prevent falling.

2. Completed 10/11/1991 DCR 90-10 2R22-S007 0 3

4160V station service Diesel Generator Inadequate load path.

Install additional anchorage.

Completed switchgear Building el 130 ft 07/24/1996 DCR 94-017 2R24-S009 01 Motor control center Intake structure Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage.

Completed el 111 ft criteria.

07/24/1996 1

1_

1 1_

11DCR 94-017 Page 6 of 7

AATTACHMENT 5: IPEEE VULNERABILITIES INFORMATION NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION

.0 Equipment Equipment Equipment Equipment Outlier Description Outlier Modification ID Number Class Description Location Resolution Status 2R24-SO12A 01 Motor control center Reactor Building

1. Potential impact between 2R24-SO12A

1. Connect 2R24-SO12A to

1. Completed 2R24-SO12B el 164 ft and B which are not bolted together.

2R24-OS012B 7/24/1996

2. Connect center sections DCR 94-0 17

2. Center sections of 2R24-S012B are not

2.

to

2. Pendin botd oete.of 2R24-S0 12B to

2. Pending prevent impact MWO 2R25-S025 01 Motor control center Diesel Generator Anchorage does not meet GIP screening Modify anchorage Completed 2R24-S027 Building el 130 ft criteria.

05/16/1994 DCR 91-144

& 91-145 2T41-BO05B 10 HPCI pump room Reactor Building Overhead duct supports could potentially Modify duct supports.

Completed cooler el 87 ft collapse.

07/24/1996 DCR 94-017 2T48-A001 21 Nitrogen storage tank Yard el 130 ft Wood roof structure could potentially fall Modify roof structure to Completed on tank and attached piping.

prevent collapse.

06/17/1996 MDC 94-5028 2X41-RH Relay Potter & Brumfield Diesel Generator Essential relays not verified for chatter.

Replace relays.

Completed PRI IDY relays Building el 130 ft 07/24/1996 located in panels DCR 94-017 2X43-PO03A and 2X43-PO03B

• This page is retyped from the original IPEEE Equipment Class designations Page 7 of 7

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0 ATTACHMENT 6 UNIT 2 - SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02 Page 1 of 16

A ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERqSN 1.0 Page 2 of 16

ATTRHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERS N 1.0

~

r2

, ELECTRIC POWER RESEARCH INSTITUTE Certificateof Completion Robert W. Ashworth Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 - Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 3, 2012 Date Caroline S. Schlaseman, P.EF Instructor Page 3 of 16

ATTHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 0

NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VER 9 N 1.0 Page 4 of 16

ATTOAMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VER 1.0 Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to

.y Jeff Horton for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt Arlington, NJ Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 5 of 16

IATTAHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VER 9 N 1.0 0*0

, N R C ON Excel&cc -fve.y project f.ev doy Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Patrick Kelly for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA Kevin Bessell Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 C-Kenneth Whitmore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA-6/20/2012 Page 6 of 16

IATT MENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSPN 1.0 Certificate of Completion Kursat Kinali Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date RobertK aswr StutrlRelablty& Inerty Page 7 of 16

ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS 0O NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERSION 1.0

,y ceVn --E vevipije(...Evei'y day, Certificate of Completion is hereby granted to Johnathon McFarland for'successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDO WNS Awarded: 7/11/2012 in Kennesaw, GA

/Kevin Bessell Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Palo Alto, CA - 6/13/2012 K*enneth Whitrriore Certified Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria, VA - 6/20/2012 Page 8 of 16

ATT 9 MENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERON 1.0 Page 9 of 16

A ATTACHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VE*

1.0 Page 10 of 16

-ATTHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VER ON 1.0 Certificate of Completion Winston Stewart Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation.2.3

. Plant SeismicWalkdowns June 21, 2012 Date' t -

I y & nerty Page 11 of 16

ATT9RHMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VER N 1.0 E3 EERC N

E*x~e?;*<* e-.-!

&ypfqiecL. Le~y )C~y Certificate of Completion is herebygranted tq Juanl Vi6zca'ya' for successful completion of TRAINING ON NEAR TERM TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION 2.3 PLANT SEISMIC WALKDOWNS Awarded: 7/26/2012 in Mt.Arlington, N)

Kenneth Whitmore

.Certified'Seismic Walkdown Engineer Alexandria; VA - 6/20/2012 Page 12 of 16

IATT MENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VERON 1.0 Certificate of Completion Kenneth Whitmore Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns 413 June 21, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliabglty & Integrity Page 13 of 16

ATACH-MENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO-SNCHO82-RPT-02-VERS N1.0 L

7ý-

Presents this Ce Wcate ofl c/ ievement To Certify 'That has Completed the SQVg Wafkdown Screening andSeismic EEvaluation #Training Course Held April6ti-1O0t, li David A. Freed, MPR Associates SQUG Training Coordinator Neil P. Smith, Commonwealth Edison SQUG Chai"man

• Rbert P. Kassawara, EPRI SQuG Program Manager Page 14 of 16

ATTMENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS N0 NO. SNCH082-RPT-02 VERSIN 1.0 r

This, is to Certif that K

has Compkted the E.

IAdd-On Seismic ITELE Training Course

§JeLdfovember 2 J, through 4 týi, 1992 David A. Freed, MPR Associates Rober Training Coordinator Progri rt P. Kassawara, EPRI am Manager 1K ii)

N

-r Page 15 of 16

ATT 9 MENT 6: SEISMIC WALKDOWN ENGINEER CERTIFICATIONS NO. SNCH082-RPT-02, VER N 1.0 a f= f~l IR=SEAýRCýH IN-STITUTE Certificate of Completion Wesley Williams Training on Near Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3

- Plant Seismic Walkdowns July 27, 2012 Date Robert K. Kassawara EPRI Manager, Structural Reliability & Integrity Page 16 of 16