ML12355A054

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0, Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic, Part 6 of 11
ML12355A054
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/26/2012
From: Stewart W
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-12-2268 SNCH082-RPT-01, Ver. 1.0
Download: ML12355A054 (63)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status: YO NEI U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42-SO17A Equip. Class, 15 Equipment Description Battery 1A 24/48V Location: Bldg. CONTROL FloorEl. 112 Room, Area RPS Batterq 1A Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic: Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of.judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YEI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y9 NI] U0I N/AU Equipment: is welded to steel frame.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YU NIl UI- N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NI] U-' N/AE]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[I- NEI U0I N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50%b for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y9 NEI UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 262 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YZ N] U["-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42-SO17A Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description Battery 1A 24/48V Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN, NEr UrI N/Ar-A electricaljunction box near the batteries is restrainedby 4" channels with two bolts threaded into the channel wall. There are no nuts on these bolts The box, is small and light, so the bolts have sufficient engagement to hold the box, and so arejudged to. be seismically adequate.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NE] UI- N/A[]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

The seismic capacity of ConcreteBlock walls C1 12-14B, and C112-15A on the north and south sides of the battery rack were verified using DrawingH-40384 Rev. 0 and Hatch Unit 2. UFSAR Table 3.8-20.

Concrete Block wall. The concrete block walls C112-8D and C112-9B did not*requirea seismic wall analysisbased on Table 3.8-20.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YU NEI UE] N/AL]

10., Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NEI UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NE] U--

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/06/2012 Jeff Horton. ( 41; 09/06/2012

/ IV Page 263 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ Nn U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42-SO17A Equip. Class, 15 Equipment Description Battery 1A 24/48V Photographs Figure 1 - Equipment I) No (1R42-SOI7A)

Page 264 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2- Equipment Elevation (1R42-SO17A)

Page 265 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Box Supported with Threaded Bolts (1R42-SO17A)

Page 266 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSIONý 1.0 Sheet i of 6 Status: YX M UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R42-SO1 7B Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description Battery 1B 24/48V Location: Bldg. CONTROL Floor El. 1f12 Room, Area RPS Battery 1B Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for.documenting other comments.

Anchorag~

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required(i.e., is the item one. YrI NZ of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage :free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YO NO UD N/AD Equipment is welded to steelframe.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NDl UD N/AC oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YV ND1 UD N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UD1 N/AU (Note: This question onlyapplies if the item is one~of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ ND U}

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 267 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 6 Status: Yt JUE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentIDNo. 1R42-SO178 Equip. Class" 15 Equipment Description Battery 1B 24/48V __

Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YJd457UL N/AEO An electricaljunction box near the batteries is restrainedby 4" channels with two.bolts threadedinto the channel wall. There are no nuts installed on these.bolts. The box is small and light,so the bolts have sufficient engagement to hold the box, and so arejudged to be seismically adequate. Also, one of two cap screws on the.box cover appears loose or cross threaded. Even if this,cap screw was to loosen and drop out the remainingcap screw will keep thejunction box lid closed during a seismic event. Therefore, the SWE's have determined this Those cap screw is seismically acceptable (See CR 517171))
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y0Z NEI U0] N/A]

and masonry block wallsnot likely to collapse onto the.equipment?

The seismic capacity of the Concrete Block Walls CJ12-15B, and Cl 12-1 7A on the north side.and south side of the battery racks were veriied using Drawing11-40384 Rev. 0 and Hatch Unit 2 UFSAR Table 3.8-20. Concrete Block walls Ci12-8D andC112-9B did not require a seismic analysis in accordancewith Table 3.8-20.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ Nn- Ul- N/An
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NOl U:

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI UI]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None Page 268 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 6

.Status: YX U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC) <2104k&

Equipment ID No. 1R42-SOI 7B Equip. Class' 15

,Equipment Descriptioin Battery IB 24148V Evaluated by: John McFarland -A .Date: 09/10/2012 Jeff Horton 09/10/2012 Page 269 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 6 Status: YK SP; ut[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. ,aR42-SO17B Equip. Class' 15 Equipment Description Battery 18 24/48V Photographs Photographs Figure 1 - Equipment ID No (1R42-SOI 7B)

Page 270 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 6 Figure 2- Equipment Elevation (1R42-SO17B)

Page 271 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 6 of 6 Figure 3 -Box Supported with Threaded Bolts (1R42-SO17B)

Page 272 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet of 5 Status: YZ NE] Ur-1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42-SO32A Equip. Class, EquipmentDescription 125V BATTERY CHARGER IG Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area SWG ROOM 1E Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results. ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end ofthis checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoragye

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required:(i.e., is the item one YZ NE of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI UE- N/AO
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI, U" N/AO oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concretenear the anchors? YN NEI UE- N/AE3 S. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UlJ N/Al (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 10122188.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEl U--

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 273 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equip'ment ID No. 1R42-S032A Equip..

Equipment Description 125V BATTERY CHARGi RIG Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE. N/AFJ Chargernot attached to adjacent-pane. This is not a concern because neither the chargernor the panel contains essential relays.
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YN NEI UEr N/A[

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NO UE3 N/AE All conduits have flex connected to equipment.
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of YN NO UE J Mc~aland potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

The chargerwas opened under Work OrderNo. SNC436314.

Components inside the chargerwere inspected visually in accordance with the directionprovided in the FAQ relatedto openingpanels. The SWE's determinedthat all the internalcomponents were installed ,aie;09/27/2012 correctly.. Therefore, the proper installationof circuitcards describedas being loose in the IPEEEoutlier has been verified:by this inspection.

Other Adverse ,Conditions 11.6 Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could ýYN NEI Uil adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See 1R24-S025 forAWC Information.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcava Date: 9/26/2012 PatrickKellV 9/26/2012 Page 274 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YX Nn- U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IR42-S032A - Equip. Class, 16 Equipment Description 125V BATTERY CHARGER IG Photographs 1: Equipment MPL# (1R42-S032A)

Page 275 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 2: Equipment Elevation (1R42-S032A)

Page 276 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet s of .

3: Equipment Interaction (1R42-S032A)

Page 277 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 5 Status:, YN N[] UE]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43-SOO1A Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1A Location: Bldg, DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM 1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y'I NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NC U- N/AC An anchoragebolt is hidden behind term. box at the southwest end of the generatorand the bolt could not be identified as having a double nut or it's condition. A single nut could be seen from looking underneaththe term. box. However, the SEWS package for 2R43-500 1A, dated 02/17/1994, evaluates the anchoragefor an identical generatorand the anchorageassessmentdoes not take credit for an anchor in a similarlocation. Therefore, it is judged to be seismically adequate based on comparison.
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y0R NEI UC N/A-oxidation?

See response to question 2.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NEI UC N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO, NO UC N/AE]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for:

which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See response to question 2.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YO NEI UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 278 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YE NEI U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1E43-SOA ,tEquip.,Class Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment: or structures? YZ NEi U'I N/All
8. Are: overhead equipment, distribution systems&ceiling tiles and lighting, YED NE] UI] N/AL]

and masonry block walls not.likely to collapse onto the equipment?

Light over the diesel fuel lines is properdysupported with wire ties.

9. Do attached lines haveadequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NE] UL- N/AL]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UL]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9 NEI UF-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

There are two (2) Ubolts not properly secured on the oil fuel lines (see photograph3). There are two U bolts present for each line. Not taking credit for the one not fastened, the single U bolt is judged to be sufficient to secure eachline in place as the weight of the pipe is low and isjudged to be seimica/ly adequate. CR 523764 has been written to address this issue.

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

To address the IPEEE vulnerabilities, new vibrationisolation mounts were to be installedfor the engine gauge panel. This was verified during the walkdown.

See 1R43-FO15A for AWC information.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcava Date: 09125/2012 PatrickKelly (PAWZ:ý 09/25/2012 Page 279 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43-SOO 1A Equip. Class Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1A Photographs 1: Equipment MPL# (1R43-SOO IA)

Page 280 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of R 2: Equipment Elevation (1R43-SOOA)

Page 281 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Unsecured U Bolts 3: U Bolts Not Properly Fastened to Support (1R43-SO01A)

Page 282 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 4 Status: YZ N-' U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43-SOO1B Equip. Class' Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM 18 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FAIRBANKS MORSE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I2.

s the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NC U- N/A" An anchoragebolt is hidden behind term. box at the southwest end of the generatorand the bolt could not be identified as having a double nutor it's condition. A single nut could be seen from looking underneaththe term. box. However, the SEWS package for 2R43-SO01A, dated 02/17/1994, evaluates the anchorage for an identical generatorand the anchorageassessmentdoes not take creditfor an anchorin a similarlocation. Therefore, it isjudged to be seismically adequate based on comparison.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YO NO UC N/A-oxidation?

See response to question 2.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YZ NC UC N/AC
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NCI UC N/A.

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y* NC U" potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See response to question 2.

I Enter the equipment.class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 283 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 4 Status: YN NF] U[

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment DD No. 1R43-SOIB - Equip. Class' Equipmentý Description DIESEL GENERATOR 10 Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YI NO. UFL N/All
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NE] UI] N/AL]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YU NO UE] N/AL]
10. Based on the above, seismic interaction. evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NE U-]

adversely affect the safety functions ofthe equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Odginallyidentified as A-46 &IPEEEoutlier. Springs on the vibration isolationmounts for the engine gauge panel were bent. Vibration isolation mounts were replaced with new mounts per DCR 88-172.

The new mounts were observed to have been installed during this walkdown.

Date: 09/12/2012 09/12/2012 Page 284 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 4 Status: Y[ NO-- uF]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43-SOO1B Equip. Class, 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B Page 285 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 4 2: Equipment Elevation (1R43-S0011B)

Page 286 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YE] No UF[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43-SO01C Equip. Class' Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C Location: Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 130 Room, Area DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM 1C Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) FAIRBANKS MORSE Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgrnents and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE[ NN of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2., Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI UE3" N/AE-An anchoragebolt is hidden behind term. box at the southwest end of the generatorand the bolt could not be identified as having a double nut or it's condition. A single nut could be seen from looking, underneaththe term. box. However, the SEWS package for 2R43-

.SO01A, dated 02117/1994, evaluates the anchoragefor an identical generatorand the anchorageassessment does not take credit for an anchorin a similarlocation.: Therefore, it is judged to be seismically adequate based on comparison.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UE- N/AE' oxidation?

See response to question 2.

4.. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE- N/AE-

5. Is the anchorage configuration consistentwith plant documentation? YE- NEI UE N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y NEUE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

See response to question 2.

1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 287 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YEI NO U[i1 Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDoNo. IR43-SO1C Equip. Class, Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR IC Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NE UI- N/AMl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting,1 YEI NEI U0 N/AEr and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto,the equipment?

There is an overheadlight (first as you enter the rooom from the corridor)that doesn't have a wire tie at the hook support(see photograph,3). If the light falls, it could potentially damage the diesel fuel oil lines. CR 516344 has been written to resolve this issue.

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YO NEI UE N/AUI
10. Based on the above seismic, interaction evaluations, is equipment free YEI NE UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

See response to question 8.

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions~that. could YZ NE UE adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Originallyidentified as A-46 &IPEEE outlier. Springs on the vibration isolation mounts for the engine gauge panel were bent. Vibration isolationmounts were replaced with new mounts per DCR 88-172.

The new mounts were observed to have been installedduring this walkdown.

Evaluated by: Juan Vizcaya Date: 09112/2012 Patrick Kelly 09/12/2012 Page 288 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YE] NZ UF]

Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1R43-SOO1C Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C Photi Page 289 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 2: Equipment Elevation (1R43-SOO IC)

Page 290 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of s 3: Light Hooked Connection without Wire Tie (IR43-SO01C)

Page 291 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: Y1Z NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P414B Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description HPCI INSTR RACK Location: Bldg. HPCI Floor El. 93 Room, Area HPCIRoom Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist-may be used to' document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YN NEI of the. 50%. of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose.hardware? YZ Ni4. U0J N/AU
3. is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NE U-1 N/AU oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y! NEI UU- N/AU
5. Is the anchorageconfiguration consistent with plant documentation? Y[K NEI U-1 N/AU (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked againstthe previous SQUG package dated 10/28/88. Sketch B-C-81-138-6 Rev. A shows the details for the anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NI Un potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment.class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 292 of 436 1

a. ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN N[-] UF-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. 1H21-P414B Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description HPC/ INSTR RACK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment.or structures? Y0 NE] U] NWAC]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NEI U[] N/AC]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NC] UC] N/AC]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipmentfree YZ NO UF]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction, effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no Other seismic conditions thatcould YM NC] U[]

adversely affect the safety~functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk by was performed within the package for 1E41-C001.

Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI Date: 9/10/2012 WESLEY WILLIAMS 9110/2012 Page 293 of 436

04, ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YN NE] U0]

10 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P414B Equip. Class, Equipment Description HPCI INSTR RACK Photographs Page 294 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 3 Status: Y[ NR] U[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P414A Equip. Class' Equipment Description HPCIINSTR RACK Location: Bldg. HPC! Floor El. 93 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment. on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional, space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[ ND of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[ NEI U[- N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI Ur] N/AUl oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UI- N/AU
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEI UU N/AUl (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked againstthe previous SQUG package dated 10/28/88. Sketch B-C-81-138-6 Rev. A shows the details for the anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NEIUr potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 295 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YZ N- U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentlD No. 1H21-P414A Equip. Class, 18 Equipment.Description HPCI INSTR RACK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UI- N/A[I
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling,tiles and. lighting, YoI NO] ULZI N/Ar-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE] N/A--
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI U1]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEl UE]

adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk by was performed within the package for 1E41-COO1.

Evaluated by: KURSA T KINALI Date: 9110/2012 WESLEY WILLIAMS 9/1012012 Page 296 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 rn Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Status: YZ NE] UE]

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P414A Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description HPCI INSTR RACK Photographs Page 297 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet I of 3 Status: YZ NEI u[-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P434 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description HPC/ INSTR RACK Location- Bldg. HPCI Floor El. 87 Room, Area HPCI Room Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., isý the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y0 NEI UE N/AEU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NEI UI'] N/AD oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y0 NEI UI N/Alj
5. Is, the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y0 NE U[] N/AE]

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was compare againstSQUG Package dated 10/28/88.

6. Based on the, above, anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NE UE1 potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 298 of 436

, ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YN Nn] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. IH21-P434 Equip. Class1 18 Equipment Description HPCI INSTR RACK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ Nt] Ut] N/A[]
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NIt UI-] N/AE]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YE Nt] Ut] N/At]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO Ut]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked. for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y10 NtI Ut1 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Walk-by was completed with component package 1E4 1-COO1.

Evaluated by: Wesley Williams Date: 9/10/112 Kursat Kinali 9110/12 Page 299 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y* NE'] U['-

Checklist (SWC)

Seismic Walkdown Equipment ID No. 1H21-P434 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description HPCI INSTR RACK Photographs I' Page 300 of 436 I

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet ! of 3 Status: YN NEI U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID'No. 1H21-P016 Equip. Classý Equipment Description CSiHPCI LK DETECTION INSTJ ~RACK Location: Bldg. REACTOR FloorEl. 130 Room, Area NW Diagonal.behind CRDs Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. ISthe anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is: the item one YZ NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YI N17 UQ N/Afl
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YI NE] U0- N/Al]

oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI U-] N/AFJ
5. Is theanchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI, UI N/AZ-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Compared againstthe earlierSQUG package dated 10/26/88. Sketch B-C-81-138-8 Rev. A shows the details for the anchorageconfiguration.

6&Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

1 Enter the equipment class name from AppendixB: Classes of Equipment.

Page 301 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCHO82-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YM NR] U-]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P016 Equip. Class!

Equipment Description CS/HPCI LK DETECTION INSTt ~RACK Interaction, Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UE- N/A[
8. Are overhead, equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI Ni] Ur- N/Ar]

and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y9 NEI UD] N/AL]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN Nl Ur-of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NEI Ur-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as'necessary)

Area walk by was performed within the package for equipment 1H21-P036.

Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI ..

)ate: 9/10/2012 9/10/2012 WESLEY WILLIAMS k, Zzll-ý Page 302 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y* N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P016 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description CS1-IPCI LK DETECTION INSTR RACK Photographs Page 303 of 436

- ýATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 3 Status: YM N[] U--]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P036 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description HPCILEAK DETECTION INSTR RACK Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area NWDiagonal Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an itemn of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is, the item one Y9 NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y10 NEI UEr N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NEI UE3 N/A-1 oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free, of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI U- N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YN NEI UU N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was: checked againstearlierSQUG package dated 10126/88. Sketch B-C-81-138-8 Rev. A shows the details of the

,anchorage.

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NE UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name-from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 304 of 436

- 'ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: Y2 Nn-] V[I']

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P036 Equip. Class' 18 Equipment Description HPCI LEAK DETECTION INSTR RACK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI Uil N/AE
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y9 NEIl UEJ N/AE3 and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the, equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NEI UO- NIA'J
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YI NEI UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YZ. NOI UO-adverselyaffect the safety functions of the.equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

None, Evaluated by: KURSA T KINALI Date: 9/10/2012 4;10 WESLEY WILLIAMS 4Y 911012012 Page 305 of 436

"ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: YZ Nn] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P036 Equip. Classe 18 Equipment Description HPCI LEAK DETECTION INSTR RACK Photographs Page 306 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet i of 5 Status: YZ ND- U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1H21-P018 Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH A Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 87 Room, Area SE Diagonal Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructionsfor Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic:Walkdown of an -item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YUI NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y23 NEI UI-I N/AF'
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild sufface, Y0 NEI UE N/A[]

oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation present on anchors. Since oxidation is only on the surface,.the anchorsare not degraded.Therefore, the condition,of the anchors isjudged not be a seismic,concern.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y[D NEI U'- N/AD
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI ULI N/AN (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y0 NO UEi potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 307 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: Y2 Nn] Un]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P018 Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH A Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YN NEI UEI1 N/AE
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems,. ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[D NEI UE NIAE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YN NEI UE] N/A-
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NE U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found nO other seismic conditions that could Y[ NE UVE-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See Component IEl1-COOIA for Area Walk-by Checklist.

Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09106/2012 Jeff Horton , .r 09/06/2012 Page 308 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKIDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: Y0 NE] UgE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

EquipmentID No. 1H21-P018 Equip. Class:

Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH A Photograp~hs Figure I - Equipment ID No (IH21-P018)

Page 309 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 - Equipment Elevation (1H21-PO 8)

Page 310 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Bolt Surface Oxidation (i121-P018) top of picture is up.

Page 311 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet of 5 Status: YO Nn- U0-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment.lD No. 1H21-P021 Equip. 4 Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH B Location: Bldg. REACTOR, Floor El. 87 Room, Area NE DiagonalUnit 1 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may'be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YI- NO of the 50% of SWEL items, requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YM NOI U'- N/All
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y19 NEI UEI N/AL]

oxidation?

Mild surface oxidationpresent on anchors. Since oxidation is only on the surface, the anchorsare not degraded.Therefore, the anchors are Judged not be a seismic concern.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the. concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE] N/AD]
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[] NO UL] N/AS (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YZ NEI UE]

potentially adverse seismic conditions?

IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B:: Classes of Equipment.

Page 312 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NE- u[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1H21-P021 Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack CH B Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment orstructures? Y0 NEI UE] N/Af
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YZ NO] U0I N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?'
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NO UE] N/AEl
10. Based on the above. seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NOi UE of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions IL Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that.could Y0 NEI UU-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

See Component 1E21-COOJBfor Area Walk-by Checklist.

/3 Evaluated-br John McFadan Date: 09/12/2012 Jeff Horton 09/12/2012 Page 313 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKODOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YN NEI Uni" Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID) No. 1H21-P021 - Equip. Class' Equipment Description RHR Instrument Rack OH B Photographs

-I -

FII(. (,I-it I Figure 1- Equipment 1ID No (1H21-P021)

Page 314 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 4 of 5 Figure 2 - Equipment Elevation (1H21-P021)

Page 315 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Bolt with Mild Surface Oxidation (IH21-P021)

Page 316 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0

.Sheet i Of 3 Status: YN NE] U[-

Seismic Walkdown Checklist :(SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P410 Equip, Class' 18 Equipment Description JET PUMPB INSTR RACK Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 130 Room, Area NW Diagonal Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown.of anjitem of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (ie.,,is the item one YN NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YN NEI U- N/AU
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YZ NO UE-J N/A-oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YO NO UO N/AU
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YZ NEO UO N/A-(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage was checked againstthe earlierSQUG package. Sketch B-C-81-138-5 Rev. A shows the details of the anchorage.

6. Based on the.above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of YN NO UO potentially adverse seismic conditions?

'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 317 of 436

. ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 3 Status: YJ N[-] Un]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P410 Equip. Class, Equipment Description JET PUMP B INSTR RACK Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YE NEI U-I N/AEl
8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YNI NEI UVIE N/A[l and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YZ NEI Ut- N/A[l
10. Based on theabove seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YN NO UO of potentially adverse, seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y! NOI UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area walk by was performed within the package for 1H21-P036.

Evaluated by: KURSAT KINALI Date: 9/10/2012 wP!qt FY WI, IIAMS:

WESEYWILIU8ljV.

I A*~LA///~1//&~/

ý 9/10/2012 Page 318 of 436

S, -ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 3 Status: Y1 NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P410 Equip. Class, 18 Equipment Description JET PUMP B INSTR RACK Photographs Page 319 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 1 of 5 Status- YN N[] U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P404A Equip., Class' 18

.Equipment Description RX Vessel' InstrUment Rack Location: Bldg. REACTOR Floor El. 158 Room, Area. Near Equipment Hatch (CL R8)

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing. Checklist This checklist may be used to document theresults of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjUdgments and findings. Additional space is: provided at the: end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE- No of the 50% of.SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YZ NEI U-- N/AE

.3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YN NIh UQ N/AE oxidation?

Mild surface oxidation present on anchors. Since oxidation is only on the surface, the anchors are not degraded. Therefore,judged:to not be a concern.

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YN NEI UE] N/AE
5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YEI NEI U- N/AZ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage, free of YM NEI UE-potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 320 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 2 of 5 Status: YN NEI] U[1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment IDNo. 1H21-P404A Equip. Class" 18 Equipment Description RX Vessel Instrument Rack Interaction Effects

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YZ NEI UE] N/A[

.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling-tiles and lighting, Y0 NO UO N/AE and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y0 NEI UE- NIAE]
10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free YZ NEI UE]

of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?

Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YN NO U'I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

N one Evaluated by: John McFarland Date: 09/06/20 12 Jeff Horton 09/06/2012 Page 321 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 3 of 5 Status: YZ NEI U[]

Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)

Equipment ID No. 1H21-P404A Equip.

Equipment Description RX Vessel Instrument Raco Page 322 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet A of Figure 2 - Equipment Elevation (IH21-P404A)

Page 323 of 436

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCH082-RPT-01, VERSION 1.0 Sheet 5 of 5 Figure 3 - Anchor Bolt Oxidation (1H21-P404A)

Page 324 of 436

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML12355A054&oldid=2089624"