ML13365A337

Comment (00717) of Laurenn Barker on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel

ML13365A337
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	12/20/2013
From:	Barker L - No Known Affiliation
To:	NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
78FR56775 00717, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51
Download: ML13365A337 (3)

Text

1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From: RulemakingComments Resource Sent: Thursday, December 26, 2013 1:43 PM To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc: RulemakingComments Resource

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:

1227 barker.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/20/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00717

Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 743 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014433C4A141)

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date: 12/26/2013 1:42:53 PM Received Date: 12/26/2013 1:42:55 PM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 12/26/2013 1:42:55 PM 1227 barker.pdf 75818 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On:

NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document:

NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1227 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Laurenn Barker Address: P. O. Box 1913 Fallbrook, CA, 92088 General Comment It is extremely unsafe to continue to store the Spent Nuclear Fuel at the San Onofre site because of the vulnerability of the site location at the ocean's edge and the lack of adequate storage at the site. What could possibly happen would affect approximately 7.5 million residents and Southern California's major cites and render uninhabitable vast lands of the area and all of the wildlife. I strongly support finding a safe and permanent storage elsewhere.

Thank you for your immediate consideration, PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: December 20, 2013 Received:

December 20, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1jx-89ej-9gp8 Comments Due:

December 20, 2013 Submission Type:

Web Pa ge 1of 1 12/20/2013 htt ps://www.fdms.

g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814cf5f3&am

...