NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562

From kanterella
Revision as of 22:03, 9 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562
ML14071A076
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A076 (42)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Shet 1 ofatu Status: U0- Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR43A 503 Equip. Class Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 4+18fK~ft IC A sJ.Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area a , Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorame 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[E NEI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

J Q5 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

ý 5 YNOUQ1 N/AQl Y4/Nf- UD N/AD Y5/N- UE" N/AD3 YdNEI U-- N/A[:]IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 501 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet? ofX'A(gM Status: Y[V'N- U[-i 114f Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSR43A503 Equip. Class' 17 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERA TOR-4-A499W-IC .A 0@4' -Interaction Effects/7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YRIND NuO N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YM/ND UD N/AD Y4 ND UD N/AD Y4 NDU[]Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM'ND' U-adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  1. N ._N Evaluated by: 111- S7 I1D I hia Ae Date: t) L t-0//26"Il PA111 A -M'isN!%5'40 e, ar-17-~ 4 ~~~~S-- -->-/- I-, Page 502 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 503 of 562 mli ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 504 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/s Status: Y N UN-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSV49KOOIA Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM PACKAGE A/C UNIT Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 175 Room, Area 6-¶0t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchornae 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y; NDI of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YI NEI UiD N/AD YA ND UID N/AD 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YM NDI UEl N/ADIs the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[4 NO UD N/AD yyND UOJ I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 505 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F/. 1I,5 Sheet 2 of r2 Status: Yf$ NO U0]Seismic Watikown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSV49KOO0A Equip. Class' 10 Equipment Description CONTROL ROOM PACKAGE A/C UNIT Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YPNEI UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YP ND UO N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentiafly adverse seismic interaction effects?YT ND UD N/AD YZ ND UO Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YM ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by:D Date: Z L-Page 506 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 507 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 508 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 509 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet i of" +Status: Y0 NE] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSW41B515F, Pkq Equip. Class, 18 Fl-116 Equipment Description SERV WTR BATTERY ROOM FIRESTA T Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 74 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YO NZ 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

No anchorage drawings/documentation

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y0 NO U- N/AO YN NO UO N/AO YN NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AN YZ NEI UO 1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 510 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of1 *-Status: YE NEI U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No, QSW41B515F.

Pka Equip. Class' 18 FI-116 Equipment Description SERV WTR BATTERY ROOM FIRESTAT Interact ion Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Tubing too close to piping, see pix, entered in CAP (CR505553, CR504972)YZ NiO UO N/AO 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Yo NEJ UEI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

nothing noted overhead that can collapse, see #7.9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?electrical, tubing, ppg insp;ected

10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?see #7 Y0 NUI UU N/AU Y0 NEI U1 Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE NE] UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Area Walk By is in folder F1-1 18, equipment QSW41C507C This package was originally signed on 8-30-12 but retyped for clarity on 10-23-12.Evaluated by: saur b T elecon / z/Z Date: 8/30/12 Te A./, 1, is- 2 3 -1j,.8/30/12/Page 511 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 512 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS c-- -I I NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0'p AI-6i Page 513 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of $5 Status: Nn] U]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSW41C5O6B Equip. Class'Equipment Description SERVICE WATER B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 'Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y9 NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YP NO UO N/AD YP NO IJO N/AD YR NO U[ N/AD Y& NO U- N/AD Y6 NO UO I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 514 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl- 117 Sheet 2 of,$%Status: YIPNO U[]Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ED No. QSW41C506B Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YFI NE UQ N/AE Y59 NO UC N/AC-YPNO UD N/AC YiQ NO Ur Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[R No UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Date: Page 515 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

-:: -117 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 516 of 562 I ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS F-l- /r)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Fl-I 7 4/5-Page 517 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0"j- 7 FLIA Page 518 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ri-1 I Sheet 1 oV,5 Status: v1ý NM UM Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSW41C507C Equip. Class' 9 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER A TRAIN BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area "1A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Y4 NO 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?,, NO UC N/AI VY'R NO UC N/AC YA NO UC N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

YP NO UO N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

uel'N3 D"1- wIG V'ea' r.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[ýNO U17 IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 519 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F:-- /iF Sheet 2 of/5 Status: YEP NE] UI"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OSW41C507C Equip. Class, 9 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER A TRAIN BATTERY ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

yI NO Ur N/A-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NI U- N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

N 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?I NO U["] N/AD YýNO UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: An 4 l 1CYAJ Wu mori.(]'l I Date: _/_2.__h 2_Page 520 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 521 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 522 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 523 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofi4 Status: Y N) UN ]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSW41C513D Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP ROOM INTAKE LOUVER Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 167 Room, Area "7*A.A Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchora2e 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

%jn h Oý Cd'NV~4c.

doUCt1Wqii~h

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

NOI Ut] N/A[3 Y Nt] Ut N/At3UO" N/AE1 Yk NtI Ut] N/At Y Nt] Ut]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 524 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSW41C513D Equip. Class' 0 Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP ROOM INTAKE LOUVER Sheet 2 of¶4 Status: Y r- NEI U Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

VN ND UD N/AD 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NEI UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

I 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y N0 UD N/AD YVND UD Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

I'Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated b.\ A. Q1/2'

~2-Q1Z,.........

  1. tW)A ~&~t~ ~A?~t Page 525 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 526 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 527 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of P Status: Y N[- U[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSY41C511C Equip. Class 1 9 Equipment Description DIESEL BLD B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. tW MI.. Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorage 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

%2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage fee of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YV NO U- N/AO Yj$ NO UO N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yo NO UO N/AC 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YN[NO UO N/AC YfR NO U I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 528 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0 -ýL Sheet 2 of' 7 Status: YO] NO uE]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QSY41C511C Equip. Class, 9 Equipment Description DIESEL BLD B TRAIN SWITCHGEAR ROOM EXHAUST FAN Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?ND Ur- N/ACl YO NO UD N/AD YQ NO U] N/AD1 YT NEI UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y$ NO U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added 6 necessary)

I~Mot Evaluated by:~fpiiuf { c~jLawa-z Mo'cq.~~A, -lk (-t Date: 9L,/ f 2\x.j v Page 529 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 530 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 531 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 532 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0 I Page 533 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 0O NI Zs-* I *.- '-i Page 534 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r FI,-12,!Sheet i ofj{Status: YO NI Url Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. MIR43TS04 Equip. Class, 21 Equipment Descripton DIESEL GENERATOR 18 STARTING AIR RECIEVER TANK #2 Location:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0058 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Scisnic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YZ NO of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Reference SEWS package dated 4/W94.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?

YO NO UO N/AO YO NO UO N/AO 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yg NO UIO N/AF 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NOI UO N/AO YO NO UO IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 535 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 I FI-IZI Sheet 2 ofX'4 Status: YO NO UO Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R437504 Equip. Class' 21 Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1B STARTING AIR RECIEVER TANK #2 7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached fines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?NO NE O N/AO YO NOUO N/AO YIN NO UD NIAO YO NO UO OthrAdvrse Cmodo.11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yo NO UO adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

C o ft (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Laura Macwyv "C sI , pc C2 T V AlV Date: 13 -.?- klf~i-2" j- 2-Page 536 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 537 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 538 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 2 Sheet 1 of , Status: Y'a N[] Ur-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

Q1EI1MOV8811A Equip. Class' 8 Equipment Description CTMTSUMP TO 1A RHR PUMP Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 77 Room, Area 129 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.Anchorate 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[] N '/of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?YO NO UI" N/AW-" 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface oxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of potentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO3 UQ- NIA&'YO NO3 U- N/At<YOI NO UQ N/A2--"I YE-NO UO1 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 539 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of,$ Status: YZ NM UE Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIEI1MOV8811A Equip. Class, 8 Equipment Description CTMT SUMP TO 1A RHR PUMP Interaction Effects 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y1240 UQ N/AQ Yt!/NO UO N/AD YV"NO UO N/AO YO'NO UD Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YQ41Q U3 adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary).I (V/ 1.~ 1 ~ (27j J I ii% " ,i-LF Evaluated by: '!ti .Date: 1, 2. K' ,o Page 540 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 T--r.3""7" xi Page 541 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 T,*0 N*4 N'N 4 I A Page 542 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=NL-14-0249,_Joseph_M._Farley,_Unit_1,_Enclosure_2,_Updated_Farley_Unit_1_Seismic_Walkdown_Report_for_Resolution_of_Fukushima_Near-Term_Force_Recommendation_2.3:_Seismic_Through_Attachment_3_Page_501_of_562_Through_542_of_562&oldid=877002"