ML14071A081

Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217

ML14071A081
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A081 (32)

Text

ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fl- d -qSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR41LOOO1B Equip. Class,Fquipment Deoscription 125VDC DISTRIBUTION PANELSheet I of 3Status: Y NEI u--18Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139' Room. Area 343Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions ror Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist lor documenting other comments.

Anchoraue

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NOof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surraceoxidation?

YO NO Ur N/AOYO NO UO N/AO4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Yo NO U- N/AI5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage configuration veufed on 8128/12 per SEWS package dated5/25946. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NOI Un N/ADYS NO U0' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 162 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 3Status: YZ N[] U0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR41LOG5IB Equip. Class,Equipment Description 125VDC DISTRIBLrrON PANEI16Interacton Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or strutures?

YO NO UO N/AO8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting.

Yj@ NE3 UI N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO UO N/AOYOEINO UOOther Adverse Condioions II. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions or the equipment?

Qoments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Al cable had adequate flex. Al mnownin hardware Is Nc and In good CwdkmEvaluated by: Takvib YbVow d zd h- 'L 1 t1ldh Date:fBrian, NP hn~ , w; 1 4Page 163 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-094Sheet 3 of 3Page 164 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI-0153Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3Status: Y[] No UZEquipment ID No. .IR42BOOIB Equip. Class' 2Equipment Description 125VDC BUS 1BLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room. Area 226Manufacturer.

Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorape

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y0 NOof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YO NO US N/AOYQI NO- US N/All4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YO NOI Ur- N/A[5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

See Comments6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

See CommentsYQ NO US N/AllYO NEI UIIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix R: Classes of Equipment.

Page 165 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R4280018 Equip.Equipment Description 125 VOC B0S 18Sheet 2 of 3Status: YO N8[ UOInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets fre from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO Nil Un N/A[-8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO Ni3 U[3 N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE NO UF' N/ArlYO NE UiQOther Adverse Conditions I I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[g No Urladversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

This walkdown was perormed to the extent possble.

Intonals were Inspected and no adverseseismic conditions were found. Anchorage verification was unable to be pedormed due to a bottomcover plate that can not be removed without racking out breakers.

Therefore, this item will beconsidered Inaccessable.

Item will be removed from the SWEL and this SWC will be included Inthe final report to document Internals Inspection.

Evaluated by:. a, son e~ý i' ' ? -Nknl. A rrnnYjO/J(QQJJ 4O.J1Yi.PEt#~

Date: f/,5,j-Nikole A rjyjPage 166 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-095Sheet 3of 3Page 167 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 5Status: Y0 NE U"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR42EOOIA Equip. Class'. 1Equipment Description Aux Slda Satteg= Charaer 1ALocation:

Bldg. AS .Floor El. 121' Room, Area 224Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchornee I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage was verfled in walkdowns dated 8W29/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

The anchorage Is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YO NEIYO NO UI N/AQ-YN NO3 UO N/AQ"4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YO NEI U0 N/AI-5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/24194.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NO UD! N/AQYO N3 UQ'Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 168 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5Status: Y0 Nil UD"Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O1R42EOOIA Equip. Class,Equipment Description Aux Bido Battery Charger 1AInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YI NO Un N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO] U[] N/AQand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YC9 NO Un NIAOYO NO UrlOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment inside the battery charger was adequately restrained withno loose connections and no missing bolts.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/29/12.

Final walkdown performed to inspect battery charger internals and complete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by completed 8/29/12.Evaluated by: Laura Maclay A'1/UA MOVEDate: 9ý-'I/h7,1i /Z013Tern' Alan Mullen&\%'A -" --01 ePage 169 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 170 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 5Page 171 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 172 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet i of 5Status: Y NEI UDEquipment ID No. QAR43Eoo1A Equip. REquipment Description Sbeaurmencer BIELocation:

Bldg. AB Floor El. 139- Room, Area 335Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

-_____Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/122. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

The anchorage is free from potentially adverse seismic conditions.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage is consistent with SEWS package dated 5/26/94.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NEIYO NEI U["] N/AllYO NEI UF N/AOYO NQ U0 NIAU-YO NOI Uil N/ADYO NEI UI' Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 173 of 217

.ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5Status: YO NO U[3aSeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIR4M A Equip. Clan'Equipment Description jM'aiuEcrBlF Ieacton t7. Am soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Ye Nr3 U[3 N/An, CR 497075 was writton prior to and outside the scope of the 2.3 Seismic Walkdowns, which a potential seismic Interaction due to Elite 1115 being within 3" of the DO Sequencer E1lF. This condition has been evaluated to not poseaseismic Interaction

concern, asdocumented In TI 497633. Since this condition was Identified prior to the walkdown, it will bejoi/l resolved by normal plant processes, and therefore is not contained in Table 8-1 of the Report.8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceing tiles and lighting, YCI NO Ur3 N/Ar'and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO LO N/AOYZ NO UO3Othe Adj Condld11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UrLadversely affect the safety ftnctions of the equipment?

Al equwat ki e O equNw "s adlqut* reahwtrafed

• h nokwm cannecat and no mnaka bo&Con~ts (Addional pqaes nay be added as noeauy)SWC org com e on& 8/28/12.

Final wakdown peonnmedto iwpwteq wneintwm andvom &et anchorage f t"kan.Area wak-bycoWfl~

WWII12Evaluated by: Lu f flA _D ar:/.&zA%1\j 4yj -/(./Page 174 of 217 4 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 175 of 217 0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 5Page 176 of 217 0 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 177 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of 5Status: YO N[] uF]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. IFR43EOO2A Equip. Class,Equipment Description SeouencerBIFAux Relay PAneLocation:

Bldg. A6 Floor El. 139' Room. Area 434Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorze1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Anchorage in the panel was verified in walkdowns dated 8/28/12.2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

The anchorage In the panel is free from potentially adverse seismiccondriolns.

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Anchorage In the panel was verified on 8/28/12 and Is consistent withSEWS package dated 5&25494.6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NOYS NO U[3 N/A[-IYO NOI UO N/AQYO NOI UQ3 N/AQlYO NO U3 N/AQ]YO NEIO Ur'Emcr the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 178 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of 5Status: YZ NI] ur"]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR43EO02A Equip. Classt.20 Equipment Description Seauencer BIFAux Relay PanelInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YN NEI UD N/AQ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UD N/AI-and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YN NO U0 N/AllYCR NQ UQOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

All equipment Inside the sequencer panel was adequately restrained with no loose connections and no missing bolts.Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

SWC originally completed on 8/28/12.

Final walkdown performed to inspect panel Internals andcomplete anchorage verification.

Area walk-by was completed 8/28/2012.

Evaluated by: Laura Maclay'Al JIA&76M/2(Lh.JJ"

....................

7Term' A lan MAenix-4rZOi7O.-

4/-'ýDate: 2-/1tLI.3.

St/ OL,,<Jur~&7-Page 179 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of 5Page 180 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 4 of 5Page 181 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 5 of 5Page 182 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. .SH21E525 Equip. Class, 20Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1-2A LOCAL CONTROL PANELSheet I of 7Status: Y0 NEI U[-'ILocation:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155' Room, Area 61Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Verified against SEWS for QSH21E525.

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YO NOYO NEI U0 N/AI-YN NEI U[ N/AOYO Nn u1" N/AnY0 NEI U11 N/ADYNO 0U]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 183 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0SH21E525 Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1.2A LOCAL CONTROL PANELSheet 2 of 7Status: YO NO uOInteracto Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO U0 N/AO8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems.

ceiling tiles and lighting, Ys NO UD N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NEI UD N/A[YO N[3 UOOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YO NO3 UDIadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

ComentIs(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AWB Checklist done with QSH22L502.

SWC completed SAT originly on 8/29/12.

Second performance being performed to inspect cabinetInternals.

IPEEE vulnerabilites (grout under panel, add missing bolts, and restrain overhead light) have beenresolved.

Walkdown and SWC performed on 10/25/12 has been retypd for clartly.Evaluated by: Ryan Harlos -Tailor Younsmblood

~ .Date:Page 184 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS m 1s fi ý j --, --WNO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0a- "14%,-Page 185 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0VIPage 186 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-IPage 187 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-- I f '-pPage 188 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

I- t~tC"_ All- X_._NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0&L." It -IPage 189 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7

SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F! -6Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 4Status: YZ N[] U0Equipmnent ID No. 0SH21E0528 Equip. Class,_20 liquipment Description DIESEL GENERATOR 1C LOCAL CONTROL PANELLocation:

Bldg. OE/EL Floor Il. 155' Room, Area 60Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may he used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEIL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

AnchoagI. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO NJof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage frWe of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YIN NO UO N/ADYO NO Ur N/ADYI NO UO N/ADYO NO UD N/AE3YO NO UDI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 190 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FI-lO4Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0=H21E0528 Sheet 2 of 4Status: Y0 NO UrEquip. Class' 20Equipment Description DIESE GENERATO 1C LOCALCONTROL PANEL7. Are sort targets 'ree from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YO NO 130 N/AQ8. Are overhead equipment.

distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YO NO UI-I N/AQand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations.

Is equipment freeof potentialiy adverse seismic interaction effects?YO NO UQ NIAOYO NO UOther Adverse Conditliob I1. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YIN NO UOadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

oMmR! flL(Additional pages may be added as necessary)

ANl cable had adequate flex. Instnumentaton was props* moW Them mes no misi hardwarefound. Baing of cabe to 1ca te ,loor appeard in good condiftk.

IPEEE vulnerabili ee (grout under panel and restrain overhead ight) have been resolvedPage 191 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-106Sheet 3 of 41C OGOCAL CONTROLPANELQSH21E528-A Page 192 of 217 ATTACHMENT 7: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F1-106Sheet 4 of 4Page 193 of 217