ML17170A198
| ML17170A198 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Perry  |
| Issue date: | 10/31/2016 |
| From: | Reeser D W NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | FirstEnergy Nuclear Operating Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16242A222 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML17170A198 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Per[Y Nuclear Power Plant Date of Examination:
02/17/2017 Initials Item Task Description a b* c# 1. w a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. J,.. P/A (j.-R b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with I Ju. lr T Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401 N and whether all KIA categories are appropriately sampled.
T Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 8-E c. N J..,. d. *Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of Ju. ? normal evolutions, instrument and component
- failures, technical specifications, and major s transients.
I M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule fct?-L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least one new or significantly modified
- scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' audit test(s),
and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and uz-R c. quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D. 3. a. Verify that the systems walk-through outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form A (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form iJL L (3) no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s) K (4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks meet the criteria on T the form. H R b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
0 (1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (F-u (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified G (3) no more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations H Determine if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of c. ,;?--applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered in the iJ-appropriate exam sections.
G 6l-E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
N Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. JZ.. E c. R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections. uz-A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). t{M oz.-Printed rt:f Date a. Author Dell McNeil 1 W /?tctf?t.
- b. Facility Reviewer(*)
n/a c. NRC Chief Examiner(#)
o.,;, Ree"' I
- d. NRC Supervisor
'L
- Note: # Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
ES-201, Page 1 of 28