ML17143A264

James A. Fitzpatrick Nuclear Power Plant - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action Amendment to Revise Emergency Action Level (CAC No. MF9722)

ML17143A264
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	05/23/2017
From:	Booma Venkataraman Plant Licensing Branch 1
To:	Bryan Hanson Exelon Generation Co
Venkataraman, Booma, NRR/DORL/LPL1
References
CAC MF9722
Download: ML17143A264 (4)

Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 Mr. Bryan C. Hanson Senior Vice President Exelon Generation Company, LLC President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 May 23, 2017

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT -ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: AMENDMENT TO REVISE EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL (CAC NO. MF9722)

Dear Mr. Hanson:

By letter dated May 19, 2017 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML 17139C739), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request for the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant. The proposed amendment would revise emergency action level HU1 .5 by replacing the maximum lake water level with the phrase, "A hazardous event that results in onsite conditions sufficient to prohibit the plant staff from accessing the site via personal vehicles." The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC or the Commission) staff's acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 1 O of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 O CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following, as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations. In its letter dated May 19, 2017, Exelon requested that the proposed amendments be processed on an exigent basis pursuant to 1 O CFR 50.91 (a)(6) and be approved by June 2, 2017. In order for a license amendment to be processed on an exigent basis, the following criteria from 10 CFR 50.91 (a)(6) need to be satisfied: 1. " ... exigent circumstance exist, in that a licensee and the Commission must act quickly ... " 2. " ... time does not permit the Commission to publish a Federal Register notice allowing 30 days for prior public comment ... "

• B. Hanson 3. " ... [Commission] determines that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration ... " 4. " ... [Commission] use its normal public notice and comment procedures ... if it determines that the licensee has failed to use its best efforts to make a timely application ... " Exelon's bases for exigent circumstances include:

• Unexpected conditions in the Lake Ontario and Ottawa River drainage basins and a change in lake level management strategy in 2016 have resulted in Lake Ontario water level being managed at values higher than historic norms.

• The lake level will continue to increase such that Lake Ontario level may exceed the unusual event threshold by June 12, 2017, based on forecasted.

• The site may unnecessarily enter an unusual event for a prolonged period of time which would compound existing public stress and concern caused by the local environmental conditions. The NRC staff has determined that the criteria for processing the proposed amendment on exigent basis has not been satisfied. Specifically, the first criterion listed above has not been satisfied. Entering an unusual event for the site due to higher than normal lake levels would not have a tangible and deleterious effect on radiological safety, general safety of the public, plant personnel safety, or plant operation that warrant quick action that would shorten the normal prior public comment period of 30 days. The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendments in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review, as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. Based on the information provided in your submittal, the NRC staff has estimated that this licensing request will take approximately 40 hours4.62963e-4 days <br />0.0111 hours <br />6.613757e-5 weeks <br />1.522e-5 months <br /> to complete. The NRC staff expects to complete this review by the end of June 2017 (i.e., approximately 1 month). If there are emergent complexities or challenges in our review that would cause changes to the initial forecasted completion date or significant changes in the forecasted hours, the reasons for the changes, along with the new estimates, will be communicated during the routine interactions with the assigned project manager.

B. Hanson These estimates are based on the NRC staff's initial review of the application and they could change, due to several factors, including requests for additional information, unanticipated addition of scope to the review, and review by NRC advisory committees or hearing-related activities. Additional delay may occur if the submittal is provided to the NRC in advance or in parallel with industry program initiatives or pilot applications. If you have any questions, please contact the James A. FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Project Manager, Booma Venkataraman, at (301) 415-2934 or Booma.Venkataraman@nrc.gov. Docket No. 50-333 cc: Distribution via Listserv Sincerely, James G. Danna, Chief Plant Licensing Branch I Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation B. Hanson

SUBJECT:

JAMES A. FITZPATRICK NUCLEAR POWER PLANT -ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: AMENDMENT TO REVISE EMERGENCY ACTION LEVEL (CAC NO. MF9722) DATED MAY 23, 2017 DISTRIBUTION: Public LPL 1 R/F RidsACRS_MailCTR Resource RidsNrrDorl Resource RidsNrrDorlLpl1 Resource RidsNrrLALRonewicz Resource RidsNrrPMFitzPatrick Resource RidsRgn1 MailCenter Resource ADAMS Accession No.: ML 17143A264 OFFICE NRR/DORL/LPL 1/PM NRR/DORL/LPL 1/LA NAME BVenkataraman LRonewicz DATE 05/23/2017 05/23/2017 NRR/DORL/LPL 1/BC JDanna 05/23/2017 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY NRR/DORL/LPL 1 PM BVenkataraman 05/23/2017