ML13022A325

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

MF0345 - Acceptance of Requested Licensing Action License Amendment Request- Relocation of PT Limit Curves to PTLR
ML13022A325
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 01/22/2013
From: Bhalchandra Vaidya
Plant Licensing Branch 1
To: Dosa J, Vandeputte D
Constellation Energy Group, Nine Mile Point
Vaidya B, NRR/DORL/LPL1-1, 415-3308
References
TAC MF0345
Download: ML13022A325 (1)


Text

From:

Vaidya, Bhalchandra Sent:

Tuesday, January 22, 2013 1:31 PM To:

'Dosa, John J'; 'dennis.vandeputte@cengllc.com' Cc:

Jackson, Christopher; Parks, Benjamin; Hardgrove, Matthew; McLellan, Thomas; Rosenberg, Stacey; Grover, Ravinder; Elliott, Robert; Lingam, Siva

Subject:

MF0345 - ACCEPTANCE OF REQUESTED LICENSING ACTION RE: License Amendment Request-Relocation of PT Limit Curves to PTLR

SUBJECT:

Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, Unit No. 2, Docket No. 50-410, License Amendment Request Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90:

Relocation of Pressure and Temperature Limit Curves to the Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (TAC NO.MF0345)

By letter dated November 21, 2012, Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC (NMPNS, the Licensee), submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Nine Mile Point Unit 2. The proposed amendment would modify Technical Specification (TS) Section 3.4.11, "RCS Pressure and Temperature (P/T) Limits," by replacing the existing reactor vessel heatup and cooldown rate limits and the pressure and temperature (P-T) limit curves with references to the Pressure and Temperature Limits Report (PTLR). In addition, a new definition for the PTLR would be added to TS Section 1.1, "Definitions," and a new section addressing administrative requirements for the PTLR would be added to TS Section 5.0, "Administrative Controls."

The purpose of this letter is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff=s acceptance review of this amendment request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

Consistent with Section 50.90 of Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR), an amendment to the license (including the technical specifications) must fully describe the changes requested, and following as far as applicable, the form prescribed for original applications. Section 50.34 of 10 CFR addresses the content of technical information required. This section stipulates that the submittal address the design and operating characteristics, unusual or novel design features, and principal safety considerations.

The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. You will be advised of any further information needed to support the NRC staff=s detailed technical review by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-3308.

Bhalchandra K. Vaidya Licensing Project Manager NRC/NRR/DORL/LPL1-1 (301)-415-3308 (O) bhalchandra.vaidya@nrc.gov