ML20132C095
Text
- l
, pf*"%
\\g 4
UNITED STATES
'I N h4 E\\^ -,,(f' %
Y Nd~ CLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
,E
[,
ij WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
\\
(
%::..( j < '
fg& "T' MAY 0 31984
((
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director h'
for Licensing, DL
.FROM:
Daniel R. Muller, Assistant Director for Radiation Protection, DSI 4
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS IN THE RETS AREA RELATIVE TO YOUR MEMO 0F APRIL 25, 1984 l
DSI/RP staff has reviewed the MP&L TSPS concerned with the RETS enclosed with your subject memo and with the MP&L submission dated April 9, 1984.
Our con-cerns with thy >gresent GGNS RETS were originally documented for DL in two transmittals.
MP&L has addressed the items in these two transmittals to varying degrees in their TSPS Items 036, 085, 086, 087, 088, 089, 090, 091, 092, 093, 105, 190, and 225. Although MP&L considers most of these items to involve consistency with current NRC guidance with a medium to long term priority (20 or E) as summarized in TSPS 249, DSI/RP concerns go deeper than this. Thus, the TSPS denoted above do not adequately resolve DSI/RP concerns in the RETS area.
With our memos, 2, we provided marked up T/S pages with acceptable wording l
to permit quick turnaround by the licensee for T/S changes. We are concerned that if the problems recorded in our memos remain unresolved the licensee and the Regional office may have difficulty with routine inspections.
Therefore, our position _is that all Category 1 items of Ref.1 and all the items of Ref. 2'shouldle' corrected according to our mark-up sheets by at least August 1,1984. The optional Category 2 items of Ref.1 would be handled on the211censee's pffority schedule, i
O/"
f f'
d h,j [d f
~
0k t
Daniel R. Muller, Assistant Direct f
a-for Radiation Protection f
f
~
,/)
g Division of Systems Integrati Memo dated November 4, 1983 from F. J. Congel and W. P. Gammi a(
to C. 0. Thomas and A. Schwencer.
,tf/
s
\\s
/6/
Buck slip and three attachments dated March 9, 1984 from Wayne Ke ke to Les Kintner.
g SH cc:
See next page p
j,-
h u'&t{
[r.. v j!'"**a' O ~I v _ (;' !s W, (li w[ ' aa, y,I a /'v() )t f
~ u 5
- \\
A
'r dM
"'"14 $( w U A a/,<1 4 l e f/ a wt M "7) +f', 2
" t-y:.ru.
a,.
n np
/a y
g9).
i JkW% Q j u
~
nounwf. apauswnn sur j7',,//g-inniaM oate m (uame. ome s,,nw.,oom nu,n.or, buddin Agency / Post)
.L/w -
1.
.T9. /4JL-z
//
4.
5.
Action File Note and Retum Apges:
For Clearance Per Conversation As Requested For Correction Prepare Reply Circulate For Your information See Me Comment Investigste Signature C+:--d nation Justify
/
ADAARKS Lt ne CC7.
h WJL J
(
.y it it. A 1,.44r.
.CCE8 csis
/
[/M(
d A 64 L 7'/d c.nd y /wr AL l M/l-00 NOT use this form as a RECORD of approvals, concurrences, disposals, clearances, and similar actions Room No.--Stdg.
FROM:(Name, org. symbol, Agency / Post) 03 OFilONAL FORM 41 (Rev. 7-76) 8048-102 raain A%-u 'a
..,o,,,,,.......a>>>
e UNITED STATES
~g
,, J "
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n
- {,g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
'+,.....f IMY 0 31984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Thomas' M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing, DL FROM:
Daniel R. Muller, Assistant Director for Radiation Protection, DSI
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS IN THE RETS AREA RELATIVE TO YOUR MEMO 0F APRIL 25, 1984 DSI/RP staff has reviewed the MP&L TSPS concerned with the RETS enclosed with your subject memo and with the MP&L submission dated April 9,'1984. Our con-cerns with th resent GGNS RETS were originally documented for DL in two transmittals.
- MP&L has addressed the items in these two transmittals to varying degrees in their TSPS Items 036, 085, 086, 087, 088, 089, 090, 091, 092, 093, 105, 190, and 225. Although MP&L considers most of these items to involve consistency with current NRC guidance with a medium to long term priority (20 or E) as summarized in TSPS 249, DSI/RP concerns go deeper than this. Thus, the TSPS denoted above do not adequately resolve DSI/RP concerns in the RETS area.
With our memos, 2, we provided marked up T/S pages with acceptable wording l
to permit quick turnaround by the licensee for T/S changes. We are concerned that if the problems recorded in our memos remain unresolved the licensee and the Regional office may have difficulty with routine inspections. Therefore, our position is that all Category 1 items of Ref.1 and all the items of Ref. 2 should be corrected according to our mark-up sheets by at least August 1, 1984. The optional Category 2 items of Ref.1 would be handled on the licensee's priority schedule, fh/
'd Daniel R. Muller, Assistant Director (4
for Radiation Protection bi
/
Division of Systems Integration 1
Memo dated November 4, 1983 from F. J. Congel and W. P. Gammill' to C. O. Thomas and A. Schwencer.
2 Buck slip and three attachments dated March 9, 1984 from Wayne Meinke to Les Kintner.
cc:
See next p e
/(i2.-
r T. Novak,.
cc:
R. Mattson F. Congel W. Gamill C. Willis J. Lee E. Adensam L. Kintner 5 W. Meinke O
6a ne
/
w 'o y
UNITED STATES g
8 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
' 'f WASHINGTON D. C. 20S$5
\\*.***/
~
MAY 1 B64 MEMORANDUM FOR:
T. M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing, DL FROM:
L. S. Rubenstein, Assistant Director for Core and Plant Systems, DSI
SUBJECT:
REVIEW OF GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PROBLEM AREAS FOR POWER OPERATION EXCEEDING 5 PERCENT POWER (TACS 54808) 1 The Core Performance Branch has completed the review of the subject Technical Specification problem areas. The staff has concluded that the current specifications for the Technical Specification problem sheet Nos. 347, 352, 354, 355, 356, 371, and 821 are acceptable as is.
(
e O.,ka,.u.v(.
b'C Ru
.m 2
.)
L. S. lubenstein, Assistant Director for Coreb nd Plant Systems, DSI e
cc:
R. Mattson D. Eisenhut
?
T M hb5" WW?
L. Kintner c F /3 4*
d
- M n W.pf w}- L fMW AA-4s d I
c.4a, Y%
f
Contact:
S. Sun, DSI:CPB
. Brooks, DSI:CPB j
X-29499
-29498
/
l y.
-