ML20132C060
Text
_
-- -- -- - y
.h
'o.
UNITED STATES F"
7 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION D
p WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- .*f MAY 0 21984 MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas M. :Novak, Assistant Director' for Licensing Division of Licensing FROM:
William T. Russell, Deputy Director Division of Human Factors Safety
SUBJECT:
REVIEW 0F GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CHANGES (TAC N0. 54808)
Your memorandum of April 25, 1984, requests review of selected technical specification problem sheets to determine which problems require a technical specification change and/or an FSAR change prior to a full power license amendment.
Your memorandum also requested review of the MP&L response to NRR recommendations for technical specification changes resulting from the Fall-1983 NRC review of the Grand Gulf technical specifications and from the NRC review of changes to the technical specifications through Amendment 12, and a review of the MP&L response to changes recommended by EG&G.
Except for the Licensee Qualifications Branch, DHFS has no issues addressed by the enclosures to your memorandum.
The Licensee Qualifications Branch has reviewed the technical specification problem sheets referred to in your memorandum (342-372 and 815-832).
None of the matters addressed in these sheets is within the area of responsibility of LQB. We, therefore, have no comments. We also have no comments on the changes resulting from the review of changes through Amendment 12 (your ) or the MP&L response to the recommendations of EG&G (your ). The subject matter of these enclosures also is outside the area of responsibility of LQB.
Our review of the MP&L responses to NRC recommendations resulting from the Fall-1983 review (your Enclosure 2) revealed two items (A.15 and A.16) that are within the LQB area of responsibility:
A.15 pertains to the specification of required qualifications of ISEG members.
MP&L response (problem sheet 063) - ensure that appropriate procedures adequately address the qualifications of ISEG members.
Include in the Proof and Review response.
LQB evaluation - this response is acceptable provided the Proof and Review response incorporates these amended procedures.
Pending receipt of this revision, t mains open.
(,,
/.
]0",,
&l@,,
(f
/
s9 s
Thomas M. Novak A.16 pertains to the qualifications, method of appointment and duration of appointment of alternates to the PSRC and the qualifications and duration of appointment of alternates to the SRC.
MP&L response (problem sheets 064 and 065) - investigate the qualification requirements and duration of appointment of alternates to the committees and the necessity,of changing the appointment authority for PSRC alternates. Determine whether or not to include these matters in the technical specifications.
LQB evaluation - unacceptable. These subjects are required to be adequately addressed in the technical specifications. This matter remains open.
This review was performed by R. Benedict and L. Crocker, Licensee Qualifications Branch. There are no known dissenting opinions.
Due to the limited review of this matter and the lack of contact with the licensee, no SALP evaluation is provided.
I()
L d b ~~
William T. Russell, Deputy Director Division of Human Factors Safety cc:
A. Schwencer L. Kintner A
d.
-( o
),,
UNITED STATES
. y, g
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- ~ '
g7 -
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, a,f May 3, 1984 MEMORANDUM FOR:
Licensing Branch No. 4, DL FROM:
M. Srinivasan, Chief Power Systems Branch, DSI
SUBJECT:
STATUS OF PSB ITEMS - GRAND GULF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS REVIEW MEETING APRIL 27, 1984 s
REFERENCE:
T. Novak's memo of April 25,1984 to L. Rubenstein, et al In response to the above referred memo, it is PSB's assessment that the following actions are required by MP&L to resolve the issues raised by PSB from the review of Grand Gulf technical specifications as stated in the meeting with MP&!. held on April 27, 1984.
Problem 1 Tech. Spec. Table 3.3.3-1 The FSAR gave two levels of voltage protection for HPCS diesel generator bus one for loss of power and the other for degraded voltage; MP&L has since changed the design.
Licensee Action (MP&L will assign a problem sheet for resolving this issue)
Problem 2 Tech. Spec. 3/4 8-4 Load rejection values for diesel generator deviate from FSAR values (LPCS pump is the largest load to be rejected)
Licensee Action (MP&L will modify the FSAR and the technical specification to reflect the actual load values and justify the value)
Problem 3 Tech. Spec. 3/4 8-6 Diesel generator bypass of trips on LOCA - overcurrent is not bypassed nor does it have coincident logic Licensee Action (MP&L have a problem sheet #808 for resolving this item) b
Contact:
S. Rhow x20698
k
(.
May 3,1984 E. Adensam Problem 4 Tech. Spec. 3/4 8-6 FSAR stated override of the design was such that if the diesel generator #3 was in the test mode and a LOCA signal occurred, the diesel generator would revert to standby mode (the tech. spec. indicates this design feature is not. included).
Licensee Action (MP&L have assigned problem sheet 333 for resolution of this item)
Problem 5 Tech. Spec. 3/4 8-11 Testing of the battery charger is not in accordance with the Standard Technical Specification and adequate justification has not been provided.
Licensee Action (MP&L have assigned problem sheet 227 for resolution of this item) f.!
~
i t (jvTti-1 $
i M. Srinivasan, Chief Power Systems Branch Division of Systems Integration cc:
R. Mattson L. Rubenstein T. Novak L. Kintner D. Houston J. E. Knight A. Ungaro S. Rhow
_. ~. _
k*
T. Novak cc:
R. Mattson F. Congel W. Gammill C. Willis 1
J. Lee
~'E _Adensam 1l t
L. Kintner l
W. Meinke 2
0 4
,i e
E 9
l
__.