ML20132B837
Text
_. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
J.
5Adesu 1
f 7,.,
'o.,
UNITED STATES
.J' NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 4
WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 s%
1 f},
%,...../
March 21, 1984 v
Docket No. 50-416 LICENSEE:
Mississippi Power & Light Company FACILITY:
Grand Gulf Nuclear Station, Unit 1
SUBJECT:
SUMMARY
OF MARCH 9, 1984, MEETING WITH MP&L TO DISCUSS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION REVIEW PROGRAM On March 9, 1934, a meeting was held in Bethesda, Maryland to discuss P.P&L's proposed program and schedule for the review of the Grand Gulf Unit 1 Tech-nical Specifications. The meeting was attended by representatives of NRC, MP&L, censultants to MP&L, GE and Bechtcl. An attendence list is enclosed (Enclosure 1). A copy of the vugraphs used by MP&L for their presentation is also enclosed (Enclosure 2).
J. Richard (Sr. VP) briefly described the overall program and indicated that Floyd Lewis (Chrm.-Middle South Utilities) and Donald Lutken (Pres. MP&L) were committed to a full effort on the Technical Specification review. A total of 135 people are working full time, 7 days a week on the program. The Technical Specifications will be reviewed in total (100%) from top to bottom and will be verified to be in accordance with the FSAR, SER and as-built plant. All reviews will be fully documented to support the acceptability of each Tech-nical Specification section.
J. McGaughy (VP) discussed the details of the program as given in the enclosed i
vugraphs. The project utilizes 55 people from GE (NMSS) and 42 from Rechtel (AE-Constructor).
C. Tyrone (MP&L) will manage the overall project while P. Jackson (Bechtel) and A. Smith (GE) will have charge of their respective company's effort. In addition to the various management personnel frcm MP8L, two SR0's will review all acceptances and reconinendations. Each section review will involve a minimum of four (4) people, j
MP&L intends to have two people in residence in Bethesda to facilitate daily contact with the staff as needed. MP&L management tentatively plans a regular weekly meeting with the staff to discuss status of the review. The MPtL review is scheduled to be completed in five weeks, on or about April 6,1984 As of March 9,1984 MP&L has identified some ?.35 proposed changes that will require staff review. The bulk of these represent additional changes from those identified by MP&L in their previous review from November 1982 to September 1983. Approximately 35 of these items have been previously sub-mitted to the staff in the time period fron September 1983 to February 1984.
Of the remainder, approximately 100 items were the subject of discussions held at the plant in late January 1984 involving NRR, Region II*and PPFL representatives. The other 100 items have resulted from further NRC comrrea.ts or from MP&L reviews.
W 's[ Nf)
(fP g
M
. There was a concern about the present review being performed by the same personnel as had been involved in previous incomplete or unsatisfactory reviews.
MP&L indicated that this was a more thorough review involvirg all levels of technical personnel and especially involving the NSSS designer, the AE-Constructor i
and the plant SR0s. Other than GE and Bechtel, MP&L had not attempted to obtain other reviewers from industrial or commercial nuclear plant sources.
The first review meeting with the staff is tentatively scheduled for March 14, 1984, to look at proposed changes and discuss priorities, i
% *O. *d k M. D. Houston, Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See next page i
t#-
GRAND GULF Mr. J. P. McGaughy Vice President Nuclear Production Mississippi Power A Light Company P.O. Box 1640 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 cc: Robert B. McGehee, Esquire Wise, Carter, Child, Steen and Caraway P.O. Box 651 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esquire Conner and Wetterhahn 1747 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D. C.
20006 Mr. Ralph T. Lally Manager of Quality Middle South Energy, Inc.
l 225 Baronne Street P.O. Box 61000 New Orleans, Louisiana 70161 Mr. Larry Dale Mississippi Power & Light Company P.O. Box 1640 Jackson, Mississippi 39205 Mr. R. W. Jackson, Project Engineer Grand Gulf Nuclear Station Bechtel Power Corporation Gaithersburg, Maryland 20760 Mr. Alan G. Wagner Senior Resident Inspector Route 2, Box 399 Port Gibson, Mississippi 39150 James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303
Enclosuro 1 Meeting Attendees March 9, 1984
(
NRC Mpal T. Novak J. Richard (Sr.VP)
F. Miraglia J. McGaugby (VP)
G. Meyer
'.. Dale J.Joosten(OCM)
J. Cross A. Schwencer G. Cesare M. Wagner S. Hobbs D. Brinkmar J. Roberts C. Julian (RII)
C. Tyrone L. Kintner J. Green (Consultant)
D. Hoffman D. Houston Bechtel GI(
R. Jackson A. Smith W. Gilbert J. Leatherman
- 1 f
e I
O h
?.
s
4 GRAND GULF NUCLEAP STATION TECH SPEC REVIEW PROGRAM
. MARCH 9, 1984 I,
INTRODUCTION II, OBJECTIVES
- III, MANAGEMENT CONTROL REQUIREMENTS f
IV, ORGANIZATION V.
CRITERIA AND SCOPE OF REVIEW I
VI, PROCEDUREFORREVIEl!ANDCLOSUPE VII.
SCHEDULE VIII.
NRC INTERFACE IX,
SUMMARY
r.---w-
,w.-,-y-
-.y,--
r,,,.,,,-,
,,,--,w-,
.n.~-+,,.-wm,-,._, -,
e
,c
,s,--_wr<
OBJECTIVES VERIFY CONSISTENCY OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS VERSUS THE PLANT, FSAR AND SER IDENTIFY, SUBMIT AND OBTAIN TIMELY ISSUANCE OF CORRECTIONS ASSURE ACCURACY AND ADEQUACY OF TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
>4 t
m
..s.
,.m
MANAGEE NT C MTROL REQUIRB U TS 0
KEY POSITIONS FILLED BY PP&L EMPLOYEES o
PROJECT MANAGEP REPORTS TO SEN10P VICE PPESIDENT NLCLEAD O
CONTROLLED BY DEFINITIVE, APPPOVED PROCEDURER 0
DOCUMENTATION ESTABLISHED TO SUPPORT EACH TECH SPEC SECTION O
AUDITABLE PROGRAM WIm CA AUDITS PERF0PMED
- 0 ALL NEEDED RESOURCES TO BE MADE AVAILABLE e
t i
e
.9RGbEGbu26.
o SR.VICE PRESIDENT l
N11 CLEAR J. I;ichaly l STEERING J. McGaughy COMMITTEE i
J. Cross T. Cloninger
. reen nsultant)
PROJECT MANAGER Bechtel Member C. Tyrone R. Fron CE Member
,' ASST. PROJECT MANAGER 1-l QUALITY SCHEDULER ENGINEER 1
1 I
l I
PRIORITIZATION I
NSSS/ BOP RETS ADMINTSTRATIVE AND DIRECTION MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER I
D.Stc,nestreet L. McKay C. Burgess J. Roberts i
I i
( 55)
NS$S BOP (42)
CE MANAGER MANAGER BECHTEL l
A. McCurdy S. Hutchins 3................... PROJECT ORGANIZATTON 1
I NORMAL ORGANIZATION
- _ j_ _
r - - - --
l PSRC
'l NUCl. EAR Pl. ANT NtfCI. EAR Pl. ANT STAFF i
f ENCINEERING SERVICES f
/
SRC I
/
6 DIRECT AUTHORITY COORDINATION AND EXPEDITING i
i 4
r w - = *t w,
CRITERIA AND SCOPE OF REVIEW SAFETY LIMITS CmPLETE AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN ANALYSIS LIMITING CONDITIONS FOR OPERA'10N (LCO)
REFLECT THE NECESSARY FUNCTIONAL CAPABILITY OP PEDFORMANCE LEVEL OF EQUIPMENT REQUIRED FOR SAFE OPERATION BASEP ON DESIGN ANALYSES ACTION STATEMENTS _
VERIFY ACTION STATEMENTS ARE CONSISTENT WITH DESIGN AN/. LYSES SUPVEILLANCES TEST TYPES ADEQUATELY ADDRESS DESIGN REQUIREMENTS AND ALLOW CONSERVATIVE OPERATION DURING TESTING BASES CORRECT AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH DESIGN ANALYSES DESIGN FEATURES ENSURE DESIGN FEATUPES ARE CORRECTLY DESCRIBED ADMINTSTRATIVE CONTROLS VERIFY CONSISTENT WITH LlcENSING COMMITMENTS
~
PROCEDURE FOR REVIEV AND CLOSUPE PERFORM DISCREPANCIES DISCREPANCIES SECTION IDENTIFIED BY REVIEWS IDENTIFIED OUTSIDE SOURCES NO DISCREPANCIES ENGINEERING OR LICENSING lNEEDED PRIORITIZE NO CHANGE -
AND RESOLUTION l
DIRECT AND DISPOSITION r
=
l l
NEEDED TECH SPEC l
CHANGE NEEDED g
I l
NORMAL NPD DEVELOP l ORGANIZATION I JUSTIFICATION I FOR RESOLUTION l t
t 4
REVIEW AND CHANGE NOT NEEDED FOR AGREEMENT WITH NRC EXCEEDING 5%
POWER CHANGE NEEDED FOR EXCEEDING 5% POWER g
p q
COMPLETE SUBMIT SUBMIT l
DOCUMENTATION PCOL PCOL IN l
AND CLOSE IMMEDIATELY TIMELY MANNER l 1
I lb N
RECEIVE APPROVED TS CHANGE
SCHEDULE 4
O WEEK 1
2 3
4 5
y I
I i
i I
i i
I i
i i
I 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 i :
GE~
U I f 1
MP&L O
O O
U
^
N J L i l i
BECHTEL PRIORITY l - NEEDED PRIOR TO EXCEEDING 5% POWER.
1 PRIORITY 2 - NEEDED BUT NOT PRIOR TO EXCEEDING 5% POWER.
{
~
{
OTHER WEEK 1 - COMPLETE REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION OF ALL EXISTING KNOWN ITEMS.
RECEIVE RESULTS OF NRC REVIEWS.
WEEK 2 - COMPLETE REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION OF NRC ITEMS.
WEEK 3 - REVIEW COMPLETE FOR NSSS SCOPE.
WEEK 4 - REVIEW AND RESOLUTIONS COMPLETE FOR B0P SCOPF.
WEEK 5 - RESOLUTION COMPLETE FOR NSSS SCOPE.
ALL PRIORITY l ITEMS IDENTIFIED AND DISCUSSED WITH NRC.
PRIORITY 2 AND 3 ITEMS AGREED UPON WITH NRC.
9 k
A 1
=
MPal/NPC INTERFACE BETHESDA 0FFICE (FULL TIME STAFF 0F 2)
DAILY WORKING MEETINGS FOR PROBLEM RESOLUTION AND INTERFArE BRING HIGH PRIORITY ITEMS TO NRC ATTEPTION IMMEDIATELY PEGt!LAR WEEKLY MEETINGS P
3 e-----
e,--v,----,
r ew.,
.~,-.n.,-,,
nn,-- - - -,
we,,,,
a
/ '
1 MP8L/NRC INTERFACE SCHEDULE TECH SPEC REVIEW MANAGEMENT MEETING 3/9 OBTAIN NRC INPUT 3/9 INEL REVIEW NRR PROOF 8 REVIEW REGION II REPORT (WEEK OF 2/20 INSPECTION)
OTHER INFORMATION INITIATE INTERFACE WITH NRR PROJECT MANAGEF.
3/13 FIRST REVIEW AND PRIORITIZATION MEETING 3/14 a 15 REGULAR WEEKLY MEETINGS 3/21 8 22 (TENTATIVE SCHEDULE) 3/28829 4/4 - 6 MP8L CERTIFICATION LETTER NOT LATER THAN 4/9
~ ~
~
~
4 SUWARY MP8L DEDICATED TO A QUALITY AND TIMELY PROGP/14 O
0 COPNITMENT OF SUBSTANTIAL RESOUPCES TO SUPPOPT PP0 GRAM o
NEED NRC AVAILABILITY AND SUPPORT o
PROGPAM WILL YIELD ASSUPANCE OF ADEQUATE AND ArCUPATE TECH SPECS TO SUPPORT GGNS OPERATION
,-wv.
y--y
-., -,-,-,- -..-.-, - --m-v
-,.7
~. -. -..
--,--