ML20198F080

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:50, 8 December 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Summary of 741114 Meeting W/Potential Intervenor DF Finn in San Francisco,Ca to Discuss Issues of Mutual Interest Re CP Applications
ML20198F080
Person / Time
Site: Washington Public Power Supply System, Satsop
Issue date: 11/24/1974
From: Okeilly P, Oreilly P
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
To:
US ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION (AEC)
References
CON-WNP-1022 NUDOCS 8605280407
Download: ML20198F080 (6)


Text

_

f

! NOV. 2 41974 l  !

l i l l a n ET !Jos: 50-460, so-s13, Sri so-sos no srx so-sos I

i APPLICANT: WASlf!NGIIN PLIBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTBf PACILITY: WPPSS MICLEAR PR(UBCTS 305.1, 4, 3 AtB s I

SLANARY OF HELTING WIMI IO4 AID F. X. FIhW, PUIDTTIAL I?TfBWDTR - .

.  ! - WPSS MJCLEAR P5WBCTS N06.1, 4, 3 AND 5 i

l

[ Qa November 14, 1974, W. H. Regan, Jr. (Enri1=-utsi Projects),

T. H. Car (Reactor Projects), R. H. Qalp (Office of General Counsel),

l

' l and I seet with Donald F. X. Finn. This meeting took pince at W.

Finn's office in San Francisco, California. The rurpose of the j meeting was to informally <He>* issues of mutus1 interest regard: ng the construction permit applications for hPPSS Nuclear Projects Nos.1, 4, 3 and 5 filed by Washington Public Power

, Supply Systan. Mr. Finn has filed petitimes to intervens in both

{ the MPPSS Nclear Projects Nos.1 and 4 and the hPPSS Nclear i Projects Nos. 3 and 5 proceedings. In addition, we were gy.J4 l to dismee the AEC's reactor licentsing process and the ^1"les

for the safety and enrironmental reviews of these applications.

i Farta-ro No. I contains a list of attendees.

i The attandees riiem= sad the contentions in Mr. Finn's petition to intervm e: (1) the proposed nuclear plant wxtid adversely affect i his business interests in developing geothersni generating capacity I in those regicas of the state of Wasidngton where the proposed plants

{ uould be located; (2) the applicant's evaluation of alternate ener27 l sources (geothemal) is inmi==pata to rule cut geothemal er-sf as a viable alternative; (3) the Pelatary staff's independent

=====% of alternate energy sources will not provide an adequate i basis to detersdne whether geothenmal energy is Crihbla alternative; (4) the Atcode Ssfety ar:1 Licensing Board taist consider aspects of the fuel cycle ir. these peHacs baran** radioactive vaste l storage and transportation affect the public health and safoty.

l l  :

l i i g A

l

[ NOV. 2 41974 t i

i Mr. Finn expressed his intent to pursue all of these issues to the l Federal Courts if necessary to assure that goothermal power piAtion j gets "a fair shal=" as an alternative to nuclear powter in the pandina pra~-Hags lie clarified the phrase, "successfully applied for," used in his petith (Section II) referring to " Federal geothermal lease (sic)

I in the states of Washington, Oregon ami Idain." He said that the Energy Partners 3974 =pntiention was the only one filai for the particular land in questia. Therefore, when ths Federal Guvu., w t does lease the land, Energy Partners 1974 would LE.the lessor. 'Ib i date, the Federal Goverment has announced m schedule for leasing l thia land. We asked Mr. Fim about his claim of developable geo-

, thermal generating capacity within the time =+=bles plamed for I the l@PSS nuclear plants. Ile replied that:

i i (1) h burden of assessing the adequacy of the alternate power l oval = ~ian is on the Federal Government (ABC). W g a u m t's

! release of the lands is necessary for contimed develo;went

! of the gerschermal potaatial. Thetsfore, the Gov .- t itself l 1s. in his a=iaiaa,in, the positim of impeding the development

that it is required to objectively assess. He expressed his j d6 termination to obtain satisfactory resolution of this conflict.

(2) Delays that have hM to date in le construction ani

! . He-ing of muclear power plants make the applicant's planned

! *chadules overly optimistic. T!ss there is actually more time availahle for geotimraal development.

I I Nr. Pegan asked Mr. Fim to elaborate on the scopo and depth of-geothermal a-M that he would consider =4p+o. !tr. Fi:m said that the ABC should extensively consult the open litetuture, recognimad experts, including local geologists and volcanologists, and goverment agencies tlnt have pertinent data.

I Mr. Fim informed us that his interest in the licensing process is i currently limited to the procedural details regarding his participation

in the hearing process. Instemi of an explanation,of the licensing l [ process, we gavo Mr. Finn a package of dooments regsnling the licensing i process and our review schedules for the tPPSS applications. The f

contents of this paclago are listed in !!r. closure 'b. 2.

l Original signed by Patrick D. O'Reilly l

l Patrick D. O'P.ellly Lim :l.du . .m W u

. , , . . . Proj.c. ct Branch 1-3

' LT!$!t-1-3 Directo5te of' Licensing e .

-g. ~.ge,_gg _ P0mg e.n *- . nj.-4y&

l j r = uc.na m.v. 9 m acx onc

  • u. .. ..... ,... w.. ....c..i. u u ...

l

.A $ f NOV. 2 41974

! l I

3- i Enclosure Ib.1:

AttenhTre Ilst Enclosure Ib. 2:

List of hmts given to Mr. D. F. X. Finn i cc: Mr. J. J. Stein i Joseph B.. Knotts, Jr. , Esq. ~

N Q. Quigley, Esq.

l i

i I

l r

i .

i i

I

! \

i I

s

\

t -l ., q .

I ,

l

! l l i I I 1 I i

t

\

l

' rreCEP O

ouanaus >

1 OATe D l

Form ABC 318 (Rev. 7 53) AECM 0240 W u. e. ooveamuamt paintene opricas sete.s s-s ee i

7_

ENCLOSURE NO. 1 ATTENDANCE LIST MEETING WITH POTENTIAL INTERVENOR WPPSS NUCLEAR PROJECTS NOS.1, 4, 3, Ahl) 5 NOVEMBER 14, 1974 POTENTIAL INTERVENOR D. F. X. Finn

  • C. Conde
  • T. Sullivan AEC - REGULATORY STAFF T. H. Cox R. H. Culp W. II. Regan, Jr.

P. D. O'Reilly

  • Denotes part-time attendance

ENCLOSURE NO. 2 LIST OF DOGNENTS GIVEN TO D. F. X. FINN AT NOVEMBER 14, 1974 MEETING

1. Safety Review Schedules: WPPSS Nuclear Projects Nos.1 and 4 and Nos.

3 and 5,

2. Press Release of April 6, 1973 on Public Participation in Licensing Process.
3. Federal Regulations: 10 CFR Parts 2, 20, 50, 51 and 100.

- 4. WASIl-1238 - Environmental Survey of Transportation of Radioactive Materials To and From a Nuc1 car Power Plant.

5. Fact Sheet on Commercial High Level Radioactive Waste - June 21, 1973.
6. Licensing of Nuclear Power Reactors (Bulletin by OIS, August,1974).
7. WASH-1250 - The Safety of Nuclear Power Reactors and Related Facilities.
8. 1973 Annual Report to Congress on Regulatory Activities.
9. Regulatory Guides: 1.17, 1.21, 1.42 and 4.2.
10. Atomic Power Safety - J. F. Hogerton (DTIS)
11. Nuclear Power and the Environment (ITTIS) l l

1 t

I

Distribution:

Docket File F. Schroeder AEC PDR H. Denton Local'PDR R. Maccary L Reading V. Stello R. C. DeYoung R. Tedesco R. Denise V. Benaroya K. Coller C. Long D. Shller . J. Kastner D. Skovholt G. lainas .

V. Moore D. Ross W. Butler T. Ippolito

.D. Vassallo S. Pawlicki

, O. Parr J. Knight K. Kniel L. Shao A. Schwencer B. Grimes J. Stol: W. Gamill R. A. Clark R. Ballard R. Ireland P. Fine R. Purple T. Novak D. Ziemann M. Spangler P. Collins EP Project Manager - J. Norris R. Vollmer OGC W. Houston R0 (3)

G. Knighton V. H. Wilson G. Dicker R. F. Fraley, ACRS (16)

B. J. Youngblood LWR l-3 Reading W. H. Regan, Jr. LWR l-3 File S. Varga- F. Kantor R. W. Klecker E. Hawkins T. Johnson C. Stepp D. Bernreuter D. Budge T. hbrphy R. Karnasiewic:

C. Liang P. Stoddart J. Costello F. Cherney i P. Chen E. Brooks R. Satterfield C. Sullivan F. Ashe M. Bolotsky I. Sihweil G. Lear l

l t

.