|
---|
Category:CORRESPONDENCE-LETTERS
MONTHYEARL-99-035, Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld1999-10-18018 October 1999 Forwards non-proprietary & Proprietary Versions of Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs, Used to Support SG Replacement Project.Proprietary Encl Withheld ML20217G0801999-10-0707 October 1999 Informs That on 990930,staff Conducted mid-cycle PPR of Farley & Did Not Identify Any Areas in Which Performance Warranted More than Core Insp Program.Nrc Will Conduct Regional Insps Associated with SG Removal & Installation ML20217P0661999-10-0606 October 1999 Requests Withholding of Proprietary Rept NSD-SAE-ESI-99-389, Farley Units 1 & 2 LBB Calculation Results Due to SG Replacement & SG Snubber Elimination Programs ML20217B1891999-10-0404 October 1999 Submits Clarification Re Development of Basis for Determining Limiting Internal Pressure Loads Re Review of NRC SE for Cycle 16 Extension Request.Util Intends to Use Guidelines When Evaluating SG Tube Structural Integrity ML20212J8391999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards RAI Re Request for Amends to Ts.Addl Info Needed to Complete Review to Verify That Proposed TS Are Consistent with & Validate Design Basis Analysis.Request Discussed with H Mahan on 990930.Info Needed within 10 Days of This Ltr ML20212J8801999-09-30030 September 1999 Discusses GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util 980731,990607 & 03 Ltrs Provided Requested Info in Subj Gl.Nrc Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Unit 1 L-99-032, Responds to NRC Re Adequacy of Kaowool Fire Retardant Fire Barriers in Use at Jfnp,Units 1 & 21999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to NRC Re Adequacy of Kaowool Fire Retardant Fire Barriers in Use at Jfnp,Units 1 & 2 L-99-034, Forwards Comments on Draft Current Tech Specs Discussion of Change Tables for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Units 1 & 21999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Comments on Draft Current Tech Specs Discussion of Change Tables for Jm Farley Nuclear Plant.Units 1 & 2 ML20212F8861999-09-23023 September 1999 Forwards Revised Relief Request Number 32 for NRC Approval. Approval Requested by 991231 to Support Activities to Be Performed During Unit 1 Refueling Outage Scheduled for Spring of 2000 ML20212E7031999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util Requested to Submit Plans & Schedules for Resolving Y2K-related Issues ML20212F1111999-09-21021 September 1999 Discusses Closeout of GL 97-06, Degradation of Steam Generator Internals ML20212C2351999-09-16016 September 1999 Submits Corrected Info Concerning Snoc Response to NRC GL 99-02, Lab Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal ML20212D0101999-09-15015 September 1999 Informs That Submittal of clean-typed Copy of ITS & ITS Bases Will Be Delayed.Delay Due to Need for Resolution of Two Issues Raised by NRC staff.Clean-typed Copy of ITS Will Be Submitted within 4 Wks Following Resolution of Issues ML20212C4641999-09-13013 September 1999 Forwards Info Requested in Administrative Ltr 99-03, Preparation & Scheduling of Operator Licensing Exams L-99-031, Informs NRC That Review of MOV Testing Frequency & Changes Made to Frequency of MOV Testing Has Been Completed1999-09-13013 September 1999 Informs NRC That Review of MOV Testing Frequency & Changes Made to Frequency of MOV Testing Has Been Completed ML20212C8041999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun Requesting Review of J Sherman Re Y2K Compliance.Latest NRC Status Rept on Y2K Activities Encl ML20212D4581999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun,Requesting Review of J Sherman Expressing Concerns That Plant & Other Nuclear Plants Not Yet Y2K Compliant ML20212A6951999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20212A8341999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20211N8041999-09-0808 September 1999 Informs That on 990930 NRC Issued GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Condition, to Holders of Nuclear Plant Operating Licenses ML20211N4301999-09-0808 September 1999 Discusses Proposed Meeting to Discuss Kaowool Fire Barriers. Staff Requesting That Affected Licensees Take Issue on Voluntary Initative & Propose Approach for Resolving Issues ML20212C0071999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-05 & 50-364/99-05 on 990627- 0807.No Violations Noted.Licensee Conduct of Activities at Farley Plant Facilities Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations & Sound Engineering ML20211Q4801999-09-0101 September 1999 Informs That on 990812-13,Region II Hosted Training Managers Conference on Recent Changes to Operator Licensing Program. List of Attendees,Copy of Slide Presentations & List of Questions Received from Participants Encl ML20211K2131999-08-31031 August 1999 Informs That Snoc Has Conducted Review of Reactor Vessel Integrity Database,Version 2 (RVID2) & Conclude That Latest Data Submitted for Farley Units Has Not Been Incorporated Into RVID2 ML20211K4101999-08-31031 August 1999 Resubmits Relief Requests Q1P16-RR-V-5 & Q2P16-RR-V-5 That Seek to Group V661 Valves from Each Unit Into Sample Disassembly & Insp Group,Per 990525 Telcon with NRC L-99-030, Forwards SNC Review Comments on Draft SE & marked-up Copy of Draft SE Incorporating SNC Comments Re Proposed Conversion to ITS1999-08-30030 August 1999 Forwards SNC Review Comments on Draft SE & marked-up Copy of Draft SE Incorporating SNC Comments Re Proposed Conversion to ITS ML20211G6851999-08-26026 August 1999 Informs That During Insp,Technical Issues Associated with Design,Installation & fire-resistive Performance of Kaowool Raceway fire-barriers Installed at Farley Nuclear Plant Were Identified L-99-029, Forwards Revised Response to Chapter 3.1 RAI Requested in 990726 Conference Call,Rai Response Related to Beyond Scope Issue for Chapter 3.5 Requested by Conference Call on 990805 & RAI Response to Chapter 3.8 Requested on 990615 & 07271999-08-19019 August 1999 Forwards Revised Response to Chapter 3.1 RAI Requested in 990726 Conference Call,Rai Response Related to Beyond Scope Issue for Chapter 3.5 Requested by Conference Call on 990805 & RAI Response to Chapter 3.8 Requested on 990615 & 0727 ML20211B9431999-08-17017 August 1999 Forwards Fitness for Duty Performance Data for six-month Reporting Period 990101-990630,IAW 10CFR26.71(d).Rept Covers Employees at Jm Farley Nuclear Plant & Southern Nuclear Corporate Headquarters ML20211B9211999-08-17017 August 1999 Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in Insp Rept 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09.Corrective Actions:Security Response Plan Was Revised to Address Vulnerabilities Identified During NRC Insp ML20210R5101999-08-12012 August 1999 Forwards Revised Page 6 to 990430 LAR to Operate Farley Nuclear Plant,Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Only,Based on risk- Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity,As Result of Staff Comments ML20212C8141999-08-0909 August 1999 Forwards Correspondence Received from Jm Sherman.Requests Review of Info Re Established Policies & Procedures ML20210T2021999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft SE Accepting Licensee Proposed Conversion of Plant,Units 1 & 2 Current TSs to Its.Its Based on Listed Documents ML20210Q4641999-08-0505 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Authorized Representative of Facility Must Submit Ltr to La Reyes,As Listed,With List of Individuals to Take exam,30 Days Before Exam Date ML20210J8341999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Second Request for Addl Info Re Util 990430 Amend Request to Allow Util to Operate Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Based on risk-informed Probability of SG Tube Rupture & Nominal accident-induced primary-to-second Leakage ML20210G4901999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to GL 99-02, Laboratory Testing of Nuclear-Grade Activated Charcoal, Issued 990603.Ltr Contains NRC License Commitment to Utilize ASTM D3803-1989 with Efficiency Acceptance Criteria Utilizing Safety Factor of 2 L-99-028, Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines1999-07-30030 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990730 RAI Re 990423 OL Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described by NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-027, Addresses Clarifications to Selected Responses to Chapter 3.8 RAI Requested in NRC Conference Call on 990624, Resolution of Open Issue Related to Containment Purge in Chapter 3.6 & Response Related to Chapter 3.51999-07-27027 July 1999 Addresses Clarifications to Selected Responses to Chapter 3.8 RAI Requested in NRC Conference Call on 990624, Resolution of Open Issue Related to Containment Purge in Chapter 3.6 & Response Related to Chapter 3.5 ML20210G8181999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-04 & 50-364/99-04 on 990516- 0626.One Violation Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violation IR 05000348/19990091999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses Insp Repts 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09 on 990308- 10 & Forwards Notice of Violation Re Failure to Intercept Adversary During Drills,Contrary to 10CFR73 & Physical Security Plan Requirements ML20210E4071999-07-22022 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990702 RAI Re Change Request to Allow for Risk Informed Approach for Evaluation of SG Tube Structural Integrity as Described in NEI 97-06, SG Program Guidelines L-99-026, Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments1999-07-19019 July 1999 Forwards Response to NRC 990702 RAI Re SG Replacement Related TS Change Request Submitted 981201.Ltr Contains No New Commitments L-99-264, Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 20011999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20209H4721999-07-13013 July 1999 Responds to NRC 990603 Administrative Ltr 99-02, Operating Licensing Action Estimates, for Fy 2000 & 2001 ML20196J6191999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards Final Dam Audit Rept of 981008 of Category 1 Cooling Water Storage Pond Dam.Requests Response within 120 Days of Date of Ltr 05000364/LER-1999-001, Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed1999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards LER 99-001-00 Re Reactor Trip Due to Loss of Condenser Vacuum Steam Dump Drain Line Failure.Commitments Made by Licensee,Listed ML20196J7471999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re Cycle 16 Extension Request.Response Requested within 30 Days of Date of Ltr ML20196J5781999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re 981201 & s Requesting Amend to TS Associated with Replacing Existing Westinghouse Model 51 SG with Westinghouse Model 54F Generators.Respond within 30 Days of Ltr Date ML20196J6571999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses Closure to TAC MA0543 & MA0544 Re GL 92-01 Rev 1, Suppl 1,RV Structural Integrity.Nrc Has Revised Rvid & Releasing It as Rvid,Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20196J3591999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards SE of TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at Westinghouse 3-Loop Pwrs 1999-09-09
[Table view] Category:OUTGOING CORRESPONDENCE
MONTHYEARML20217G0801999-10-0707 October 1999 Informs That on 990930,staff Conducted mid-cycle PPR of Farley & Did Not Identify Any Areas in Which Performance Warranted More than Core Insp Program.Nrc Will Conduct Regional Insps Associated with SG Removal & Installation ML20212J8801999-09-30030 September 1999 Discusses GL 98-01,suppl 1, Y2K Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util 980731,990607 & 03 Ltrs Provided Requested Info in Subj Gl.Nrc Considers Subj GL to Be Closed for Unit 1 ML20212J8391999-09-30030 September 1999 Forwards RAI Re Request for Amends to Ts.Addl Info Needed to Complete Review to Verify That Proposed TS Are Consistent with & Validate Design Basis Analysis.Request Discussed with H Mahan on 990930.Info Needed within 10 Days of This Ltr ML20212E7031999-09-23023 September 1999 Responds to GL 98-01, Year 2000 Readiness of Computer Sys at Npps. Util Requested to Submit Plans & Schedules for Resolving Y2K-related Issues ML20212F1111999-09-21021 September 1999 Discusses Closeout of GL 97-06, Degradation of Steam Generator Internals ML20212C8041999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun Requesting Review of J Sherman Re Y2K Compliance.Latest NRC Status Rept on Y2K Activities Encl ML20212D4581999-09-10010 September 1999 Responds to to D Rathbun,Requesting Review of J Sherman Expressing Concerns That Plant & Other Nuclear Plants Not Yet Y2K Compliant ML20212A8341999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20212A6951999-09-0909 September 1999 Requests That Licensees Affected by Kaowool Fire Barriers Take Issue on Voluntary Initiative & Propose Approach for Resolving Subj Issues.Staff Plans to Meet with Licensees to Discuss Listed Topics ML20211N8041999-09-0808 September 1999 Informs That on 990930 NRC Issued GL 96-06, Assurance of Equipment Operability & Containment Integrity During Design-Basis Accident Condition, to Holders of Nuclear Plant Operating Licenses ML20211N4301999-09-0808 September 1999 Discusses Proposed Meeting to Discuss Kaowool Fire Barriers. Staff Requesting That Affected Licensees Take Issue on Voluntary Initative & Propose Approach for Resolving Issues ML20212C0071999-09-0202 September 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-05 & 50-364/99-05 on 990627- 0807.No Violations Noted.Licensee Conduct of Activities at Farley Plant Facilities Generally Characterized by safety-conscious Operations & Sound Engineering ML20211Q4801999-09-0101 September 1999 Informs That on 990812-13,Region II Hosted Training Managers Conference on Recent Changes to Operator Licensing Program. List of Attendees,Copy of Slide Presentations & List of Questions Received from Participants Encl ML20211G6851999-08-26026 August 1999 Informs That During Insp,Technical Issues Associated with Design,Installation & fire-resistive Performance of Kaowool Raceway fire-barriers Installed at Farley Nuclear Plant Were Identified ML20210T2021999-08-0606 August 1999 Forwards Draft SE Accepting Licensee Proposed Conversion of Plant,Units 1 & 2 Current TSs to Its.Its Based on Listed Documents ML20210Q4641999-08-0505 August 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Gfes of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 991006.Authorized Representative of Facility Must Submit Ltr to La Reyes,As Listed,With List of Individuals to Take exam,30 Days Before Exam Date ML20210J8341999-07-30030 July 1999 Forwards Second Request for Addl Info Re Util 990430 Amend Request to Allow Util to Operate Unit 1,for Cycle 16 Based on risk-informed Probability of SG Tube Rupture & Nominal accident-induced primary-to-second Leakage ML20210G8181999-07-26026 July 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-04 & 50-364/99-04 on 990516- 0626.One Violation Identified & Being Treated as Noncited Violation IR 05000348/19990091999-07-23023 July 1999 Discusses Insp Repts 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09 on 990308- 10 & Forwards Notice of Violation Re Failure to Intercept Adversary During Drills,Contrary to 10CFR73 & Physical Security Plan Requirements ML20196J5781999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re 981201 & s Requesting Amend to TS Associated with Replacing Existing Westinghouse Model 51 SG with Westinghouse Model 54F Generators.Respond within 30 Days of Ltr Date ML20196J6571999-07-0202 July 1999 Discusses Closure to TAC MA0543 & MA0544 Re GL 92-01 Rev 1, Suppl 1,RV Structural Integrity.Nrc Has Revised Rvid & Releasing It as Rvid,Version 2 as Result of Review of Responses ML20196J6191999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards Final Dam Audit Rept of 981008 of Category 1 Cooling Water Storage Pond Dam.Requests Response within 120 Days of Date of Ltr ML20196J7471999-07-0202 July 1999 Forwards RAI Re Cycle 16 Extension Request.Response Requested within 30 Days of Date of Ltr ML20196J3591999-06-30030 June 1999 Forwards SE of TR WCAP-14750, RCS Flow Verification Using Elbow Taps at Westinghouse 3-Loop Pwrs ML20196D1931999-06-22022 June 1999 Discusses Requesting Approval & Issuance of Plant Units 1 & 2 ITS by 990930.New Target Date Agrees with Requested Date ML20196H9801999-06-10010 June 1999 Submits Two RAI Re ITS Section 4.0 That Were Never Sent. Reply to RAI Via e-mail ML20196A3401999-06-10010 June 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-03 & 50-364/99-03 on 990404-0515.No Violations Noted ML20206R4741999-05-13013 May 1999 Informs That Staff Reviewed Draft Operation Insp Rept for Farley Nuclear Station Cooling Water Pond Dam & Concurs with FERC Findings.Any Significant Changes Made Prior to Issuance of Final Rept Should Be Discussed with NRC ML20206M2321999-05-11011 May 1999 Informs That NRC Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Reorganized Effective 990328.As Part of Reorganization, Division of Licensing Project Mgt Created ML20206G7341999-05-0404 May 1999 Forwards Safety Evaluation Re Completion of GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves ML20206G2411999-04-30030 April 1999 Forwards Revised RAI Re GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Movs, Program at Farley.Requests to Be Notified of Rev to Original Target Date of 990521 ML20206R2031999-04-29029 April 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-02 & 50-364/99-02 on 990221-0403.No Violations Noted ML20205T1931999-04-0909 April 1999 Informs That on 990316,J Deavers & Ho Christensen Confirmed Initial Operator Licensing Exam Schedule for Farley NPP for Y2K.Initial Exam Dates Are Wks of 000508 & 22 for Approx 12 Candidates.Chief Examiner Will Be C Ernstes ML20205Q1541999-04-0606 April 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-09 & 50-364/99-09 on 990308-10.One non-cited Violation Identified ML20205M2831999-04-0202 April 1999 Forwards Errata Ltr for Farley Nuclear Power Plant FEMA Exercise Rept.Page 19 of Original Rept Should Be Replaced with Encl Corrected Page 19 ML20196K4881999-03-19019 March 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/99-01 & 50-364/99-01 on 990110- 0220.One Violation of NRC Requirements Occurred.Violation Being Treated as non-cited Violation Consistent with App C of Enforcement Policy ML20205A2611999-03-19019 March 1999 Advises of NRC Planned Insp Effort Resulting from Farley Plant Performance Review on 980202.Historical Listing of Plant Issues & Details of NRC Insp Plan for Next 8 Months Encl ML20204C9561999-03-17017 March 1999 Forwards RAI Re GL 96-05, Periodic Verification of Design-Basis Capability of Safety-Related Movs, Program at Plant,Units 1 & 2.Response Requested by 990521 ML20204E6601999-03-11011 March 1999 Discusses Ofc of Investigation Rept 2-1998-024 Re Contract Worker Terminated by General Technical Svc Supervisor for Engaging in Protected Activity.Evidence Did Not Substantiate Allegation & No Further Action Planned ML20207M2181999-03-11011 March 1999 Advises That Info Contained in 990125 Application CAW-99-1318 & Affidavit Will Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20207M1991999-03-0808 March 1999 Partially Withheld Info Re Meeting Held on 990129 at Region II Ofc in Atlanta,Ga to Discuss Physical Protection Measure for Svc Water Intake Structure Located at Facility (Ref 10CFR73.21).List of Attendees Encl ML20206U1831999-02-0909 February 1999 Responds to Encl Ltrs, & 1223 Re Generic Implication of part-length CRDM Housing Leak.Review Under TAC Numbers MA1380 & MA1381 Considered Closed ML20203G5541999-02-0505 February 1999 Informs That NRC Plans to Administer Generic Fundamentals Exam Section of Written Operator Licensing Exam on 940407. Representative of Facility Must Submit Either Ltr Indicating No Candidates or Listing of Candidates for Exam ML20203G3921999-02-0202 February 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/98-08 & 50-364/98-08 on 981129- 990109 ML20199L4451999-01-25025 January 1999 Forwards for Review & Comment Revised Draft Info Notice Re Inservice Testing of A-4 Multimatic Deluge Valve for Farley NPP Units 1 & 2.Informs That Comments Submitted on 981120 Were Reviewed & Incorporated Where Appropriate ML20199K7351999-01-21021 January 1999 Responds to 981123 Request by Providing Copy of Latest Draft of Info Notice Being Prepared Which Discusses Failure of Several Preaction Sprinker Sys Deluge Valves.Requests Submittal of Comments by 981120 ML20199K7231999-01-20020 January 1999 Confirms 990119 Telcon Re Informational Meeting Scheduled for 990129 to Be Held in Atlanta,Ga to Discuss Security Related Issues at Plant.Meeting Will Be Closed to Public,Due to Sensitive Nature of Issues ML20199K1381999-01-12012 January 1999 Informs That on 990117,Region II Implemented Staff Reorganization as Part of agency-wide Streamlining Effort, Due to Staffing Reductions in FY99 Budget.Organization Charts Encl ML20199D8541999-01-12012 January 1999 Forwards SE Accepting Relief Request for Inservice Insp Program for Plant,Units 1 & 2 ML20199C9361999-01-0808 January 1999 Forwards Insp Repts 50-348/98-14 & 50-364/98-14 on 981207- 10.No Violations Noted 1999-09-09
[Table view] |
Text
. .
January 25, 1999 Mr. D. N. Morey Vice President - Farley Project Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. I Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 I
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR A TECHNICAL REVIEW OF REVISED DRAFT INFORMATION NOTICE REGARDING INSERVICE TESTING OF THE A-4 MULTIMATIC DELUGE VALVE - JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2
Dear Mr. Morey:
4 1
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is planning to issue an information notice (IN) discussing the failure of several preaction sprinkler system deluge valves at Joseph M. Farley ;
Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. By letier dated November 13,1998, we requested your review of Revision 0 of the draft information notice. You responded, with comments, by letter dated November 20,1998. We have reviewed your comments and incorporated them where appropriate. We request that you review the enclosed revised draft IN to ensure the technical j information regarding the event is accurate. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated. '
l The enclosed IN has been discussed with Mark Ajtuni of your staff. A target date for your written comments has been agreed upon to be Goruary 12,1999. Should a situation occur that prevents you from meeting the target date, please contact Jacob l. Zimmerman at (301) 415-2426. l Sincerely, i Original signed by:
Herbert N. Berkow, Director i Project Directorate ll-2 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/Il Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl: See next page plSTRIBUTION: i Docket File JZwolinski Pskinnw, Rll MSalley PUBLIC PBerkow TJohnson,Ril JRoe PDil-2 RF L8erry GHolahan RDennig ACRS JZimmerman TMarsh WBurton '
OGC LRPlisco, Ril SWest DOCUMENT NAME: G:\FARLEY\lNREV1.WPD OFFICE PDil-M PDil-2/LA PECB/C /
YLB/C ,T PDil-?/D, NAME J. MAN:en L. BERRY R.DENNIG T. MARSH f H[BE W DATE /b /99 l / N /99 / / E/ /99 \ / N /99 [1 ' /99 COPY ES NO YES[Nh YES NO YE h NO YESNbl OFFICIKL RECORD COPY 9901270234 990125 ;er "'
W PDR ADOCK 05000348 m r r3L ; M ,' . C '
(,j;;;?; _ , , ,
. V P PDR
@ uro a
!L UNITED STATES
[
2 j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 2006H001 !
.....# January 25, 1999 1
Mr. D. N. Morey l
Vice President - Farley Project 1 Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. l Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 l
l
SUBJECT:
REQUEST FOR A TECHNICAL REV!EW OF REVISED DRAFT INFORMATION i NOTICE REGARDING INSERVICE TESTING OF THE A-4 MULTIMATIC DELUGE VALVE - JOSEPH M. FARLEY NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 l
Dear Mr. Morey:
l The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission is planning to issue an information notice (IN) discussing the failure of several preaction sprinkler system deluge valves at Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2. By letter dated November 13,1998, we requested your review of Revision 0 of the draft information notice. You responded, with comments, by letter dated November 20,1998. We have reviewed your comments and incorporated them where appropriate. We request that you review the enclosed revised draft IN to ensure the technical information regarding the event is accurate. Your cooperation in this matter is appreciated.
The enclossd IN has been discussed with Mark Ajiuni of your staff. A target date for your written comrnents has been agreed upon to be February 12,1999. Should a situation occur that prevents you from meeting the target date, please contact Jacob l. Zimmerman at (301) 415-2426.
Sincerely, Y l1' -
Iprbert N. Berkow, Director
/ Project Directorate ll-2 Division of Reactor Projects - 1/11 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-348 and 50-364
Enclosure:
As stated cc w/ encl: See next page
1 l
l l
Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant cc:
Mr. L. M. Stinson Rebecca V. Badham General Manager- SAER Supervisor Southern Nuclear Operating Company Southern Nuclear Operating Company l Post Office Box 470 P. O. Box 470 Ashford, Alabama 36312 {
Ashford, Alabama 36312 i Mr. Mark Ajiuni, Licensing Manager Southern Nuc! ear Operating Company Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201-1295 l Mr. M. Stanford Blanton Balch and Bingham Law Firm Post Office Box 306 1710 Sixth Avenue North Birmingham, Alabama 35201 Mr. J. D. Woodard Executive Vice President Southern Nuclear Operating Company Post Office Box 1295 Birmingham, Alabama 35201 State Health Officer Alabama Department of Public Health 434 Monroe Street '
Montgomery, Alabama 36130-1701 Chairman Houston County Commission Post Office Box 6406 Dothan, Alabama 36302 Regional Administrator, Region 11 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Atlanta Federal Center 61 Forsyth Street, S.W., Suite 23T85 Atlanic, Georgia 30303 -
Resident inspector U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 7388 N. State Highway 95 Columbia, Alabama 36319 l
?
l
l I
l
! UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 February xx,1999 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 99-XX: FAILED FIRE PROTECTION DELUGE If.VES AND i
POTENTIAL TESTING DEFICIENCIES IN PREACTION SPRINKLER SYSTEMS /' W
. j:) % ,%,
y hr l Addressees # '\ f J][ y . My All NRC licensees. N/ h vJf l Purcose 4 A'
(NRC) is iss}ing this informatiol The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission u addressees to test methodologies for fire protection deluge valves that may not adequately demonstrate valve operability. It is expected that recipients will revie,w the information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions;as appropriate, to avoid similar problems.
However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response isiequired8 ~
y f
f Backaround /'i i d
/[ Il /
Valves for sprinkler system automatic control (SSAC) are used in fire protection systems that protect are,as housing safety-related equipment and that also protect non-safety-related
~.
equipment used for safe' shutdown. Many,of these systems are used to provide primary fire
~
protection and to meet the, requirements of"10 CFR Part 50, Appendix R, Section Ill.G. Poor design, deficient maintenance, or' inadequate testirig of SSAC valves and associated solenoid valves can leed to a common 2 mode failure of the valves to perform their design function of providing adeqDate and reliable fire protection. This, in tum, can result in the failure of safety-related equipment and the inability to achieve and maintain a safe reactor shutdown condition if a fire occurs. ;
f f__$f
! TheWodel A-4 Multima ic Valve manufactured by Grinnell is a deluge valve designed for use in fiJe protection systems! It is' used as a system control valve in deluge, preaction, and special
}ypes of fire protection' systems and may also provide for actuation of fire alarms when the systerns operate. ,f 1 ,. 'n Gr i
Plea'ctio'rivalves contain connections for monitoring pressure in the diaphragm chamber and in the main water supply, for providing valve drainage and for supplying water to the diaphragm chamber.' All required components for these connections are typically supplied by the valve manufacturer as " trim packages" and are included as part of the Underwriters Laboratories (UL) and Factory Mutual, Inc. (FM) certifications of the valves.
i
l l H
IN 99-xx February xx,1999 Page 2 of 5 Descriotion of Circumstances l
In the week of March 4,1996, during surveillance testing of preaction sprinkler systems in the Farley Unit 1 fire protection system,5 of 11 SSAC valves (Grinnell Model A4 deluge valves) failed to trip open when water pressure was vented out of the diaphragm chamber. Upon additional testing, the licensee found that several other SSAC valves failed. The/ cot-cause team, formed after the initial valve failures, concluded that the diaphragm was sticking to its retainer and push rod disk, that the push rod assembly showed wear (pits and eroded plating),
and that the associated solenoid valves were not properly ble.eding w,ater pregsure out of the diaphragm area.
j4/ R using an abrasive cle'a h
The investigators found that the licensee was chrome-plated push rod and the push rod guide in the'diaphragrd retainers.'The teamV theorized that this activity may have created rust particles that caused the sticking. In like manner, abrasives used to clean the solenoid valves c'ould cause the plunger assembly to stick.
Grinnell does not recommend using any abrasives that [emove metal because the solvents attack the valve seats and the main orifice. Grinnell recom' mends cleaning the push rods, guides, and solenoid valves with only soap, water, and clean cloths. n g y )
The root-cause team also found that the solendid valves were designed for operating pressures of approximately 150 psig (UL maximum rated pressure is 175 psig),?whereas the actual operating pressures often exceeded 150 psig (pressures sometim'es went as high as 225 psig).
The staff theorizes that the valves may not be able to ope'l aginst this pressure.
d f? h^
Although the team did not conclusfvely detentiine the root cause of the valve failures, it l
recommended (1) replacing the. diaphragms'and solendid valves, (2) installing new solenoid valves with a design pressure of 200 psi (and factory tested to 300 psi), (3) flushing the solenoid valve piping and diaphragm chamber when cleaning the solenoids, (4) requiring the use of onfy soap, water /and a clean cloth when cleaning the solenoid valves, (5) cleaning the solenoid and SSAC valv'et more frequently, and (6) testing the valves more often - every 12 months instead of 18 months (in the short term, the licensee increased testing to every 2, 6, and 12 months after resetting'the valves to improve reliability).
/ ~
In subseque'nt walkdowns, the team found that the piping for the deluge valve control drain lines l had a 3/8-inch diameterinstead of the %-inch diameter line usually supplied as part of the trim packahe provided by t$e manufacturer and listed by the independent testing laboratory (i.e., UL
, or FM). The use of thelsrnaller drain line could potentially inhibit the bleedoff of water from the
! diaphragm chamber, resulting in increased pressure in the chamber. The staff notes that this I
restriction, in turn, could prevent the clapper from opening.
l f} q ,//
i in mid-February '1998, the licensee performed a scheduled surveillance test on several deiuge l Valvec in the preaction sprinkler system. One valve failed to trip, and the push rod had to be f'orced back manually after completely isolating and draining the diaphragm chamber, closing the main isolation valve, opening the main drain, and opening the valve faceplate. Inspection of the rubber diaphragm showed a " dimple" near the diaphragm chamber supply inlet. The valve had been left in the tripped condition for about 22 days in May 1997, then it was reset and left in this position until this surveillance (for about 9 months). As a result of this failure, the licensee tested a sample of six additional valves that had been left in a tripped condition for long periods.
IN 99-xx February xx,1999 Page 3 of 5 One of these valves failed to trip electrically. Inspection of this valve indicated that the push rod appeared to be misaligned in the retainer ring slot and some corrosion had formed where the rod slides through the ring. Also, the diaphragm was stuck to the face of the push rod. In total, five of the six sample valves and one other valve failed to trip properly.
In June 1998, as part of the ongoing testing program, one of the deluge valves was manually actuated from its pull station; it failed to operate. An investigation indicated that'the pull station housing had rotated and was preventing complete travel (i.e., fully opeh) of,the valve handle.
After adjusting the pull station housing, the handle was actuated cya,n and th,e deluge valve successfully tripped. j ,
,f Q. 3' h The team commissioned by the licensee to study the problems with. e A-4 valves ~ concluded f
that, although the cause and effect are not known, it appears that the failure \ccurred within a tripped open valve exposed to pressure over time. Tss expos 6te caused the Oatve to fail when reset. The team noted that the manuf acturer does not recommend leaving the tripp'ed-open valves pressurized for a significant length of time. g. -ms y y >g The staff is continuing to monitor the licensee's investigation into the valve failures.
m
~
Discussion #
,.1 '
- /
f} 'x% j;v The staff noted several potential problenis as a result of this dvent/First, as discussed above, when deluge valves were left in the tripped condition for'long periods, the potential arose for the rubber diaphragm to bond to the push rod and the flange diaphragm could remain partially, bondedstricting to theflow flange, from there/ When the diaphragm valves ar chamber, and keeping the valve from operating. Bonding may be particularly pronounced in systems using well water og. rap river wate'r. It is a co'mmon practice for many plants to keep their preaction sprinkler system deluge valves in~a tripped condition for long periods, usually during outage's when welding'or other activsies are taking place, which increases the likelihood of spurious system actu'ation. Grinnell recornmends that the valve be reset within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of any valve operation and that the intemal components of valves be cleaned and inspected after any valve op'eration.
j+
s t, Second, the'use of plant-supplied or plant-designed trim packages instead of the UL- or FM-certified packages an'd designs supplied by the valve manufacturer may result in issues such as undersized drain lines,hhich may restrict the bleedoff from the diaphragm chamber and further inhibit valve actuation. 4 V
[; /
Jhird, an evaluation by Grinnell concluded that the valve release mechanism may be jamming from the high pressure and surging conditions in the deluge system. The jamming may be
@ elated to deep indentations on the valve latch. Cleaning and inspection of the valves' internal bomponents should reveal these potential problems.
Q;;/
While reviewing this event, the staff noted that the licensee performs full-flow testing. It is the staff's understanding that many plants isolate the deluge valves from the main water supply during valve testing. This practice is a potential testing weakness and may mask the actuation problems discussed herein. With the deluge valve isolated, a limited volume of water is trapped in both the main line and the diaphragm chamber supply line. The water in the diaphragm
-- __ _- . .- -. - - -_ - - _ - _ - _ _~ -_ -
IN 99-xx February xx,1999 Page 4 of 5 chamber is slowly bled off until the clapper opens. If the diaphragm has bonded to the flange, the inlet to the diaphragm chamber could be partially blocked, inhibiting (but not preventing) valve actuation. However, during normal operation with full flow from the diaphragm chamber supply line, the primary flow path would fc! low the supply line to the drain, thus trapping water in the diaphragm chamber and preventing valve actuation. Note the following statement in i National Fire Protection Association Standard 25 (" Standard for the Inspection, T,asting, and Maintenance of Water Based Fire Protection Systems," 1995 edition, section 94.3.2.2): "Each deluge or preaction va!ve shall be trip tested annually at full flow (en)ph' asis added] in warm weather and in accordance with the manufacturer's instructions." Ti}e valve manufacturer may also have special requirements for inservice testing. The'A-4 valve manufacturer recommends.
partial flow testing where ful!-flow testing is undesirableF /J rs %
ff f N:Q j/
Another event involving the failure of automatic deluge valves took place at Grand Guffin1983, and is discussed in Information Notice (IN) 84-16, "Fallure'of A'utomatic Sorinkier, System l Valves to Operate." While the licensee was performind an operational test of the emergency '
diesel generator (EDG), a fire occurred in the diesel. The automatic deluge valve (6-inch Model C valve manufactured by the Automatic Sprinkidr C5mpany of America (ASCO)) failed to open. Approximately 3 months later, a Model C valvfin a preaction sprinkler system for the EDG room at Grand Gulf failed to operate during a'tdst. In both cases, scoring was found in the actuation weight upper guide collar and in the tiox that encloses th'e weight guide bushing.
g3 g jj v Another instance of repeated failures of a preactio,n deluge valve ~ occurred in 1997 at Limerick Unit 1. A Model"D" 6-inch deluge valve manufactured by. Star Sprinkler, Inc., did not actuate during a surveillance test. The frequency of testing had tieenincreased because of earlier failures caused by suspected mechanical problems. Continued troubleshooting of the valve failures uncovered a potential voltage mismatch betwedn the deluge valve and the Chemetron release control panel, resulting In marginal power available to operate the valve. The Model"D" valves g( were^ subsequently p' laced with rep y(odel
%9 "G" valves, siso manufactured by Star Sp Related Generic Communications %
e N 4 %,A Information Notice (IN)'8916,~ " Failure of Automatic Sprinkler System Valves to Operate," issued March 2, 984.
O f 2 dequ eYire Suppression System Testing," issued April 8,1992.
f y. f e / IN 97-22,"Potentiaifor' Failure of the OMEGA Series Sprinkler Heads," issued 3/ September 22,i997.
'f y yQ f y, URM' * ,. j y
i %j #
~
._ . . . - _ . = .- .. - -
f-IN 99-xx February xx,1999 Page 5 of 5 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. However, addressees are reminded that they are required to consider industry-wide operating experience (including NRC information notices) where practical, when setting goals and performing periodic evaluations under 10 CFR 50.65, " Requirement for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants." If you have any questions about the information in this l notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed below or the appropriate Office of I Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
/
sQ4 :
%$h \
l David B. MattNews, Directok.hMk Division . Reactor P gram Management [ i Office of Uiclear ctor Regul ' d.y.
\
Technical contacts:
Rhh / ]$s Mark h. Salley, NRR R f Caldwell, Ril 301-415-2840 334-899-3386s E-mail: mxs3@nrc. gov (Mail:'rkc1On}c. gov
\
William F. Burton, NRR (W+ q WQ 43%
301-415-2853 M ~V l
E-mail: wfb@nrc.g$foyfs
.fL1@i g %. f dl % j ' \
Attachment:
List of Recently issued NRC Information Noticesp 4(, i
?
i
. %, . 4 3:
Wh$?; . m.
% ,mlQ'g wJ
]R ? '
.j ' .m {.'.gg*;p t.gg l
i
.
- p
$Yhi ,,
f a yV n
l Q >f, ess U$bD.y .gw. .g. g/
i n
??. Mi) Y 1
E