ML20209F983
| ML20209F983 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 07/17/1985 |
| From: | Michaels T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Novak T Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| CON-WNP-1375 NUDOCS 8508010042 | |
| Download: ML20209F983 (46) | |
Text
\ ,
-1 9
- g#'%**g UNITED STATES 1
{ j' e 7,
$ 1
- j NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
%, ,o8 July 17,1985 MEMORANDUM FOR: Thomas M. Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Division of Licensing FROM:
Theodore S. Michaels, Senior Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing
SUBJECT:
REPORT ON WNP-3 PLANT VISIT AND MEETING REGARDING READINESS REVIEW FOR WNP-3 On July 1,1985 the WPPSS conducted a tour of WNP-3 for members of IE, NRR and Region V to familiarize the staff with the plant, its status, and methods being used to preserve equipment.
The NRC staff in attendance is shown in enclosure 1, day after the plant tour.which is a meeting agenda for a July 2, 1985 meeting, the Members of the news media and the public were also in attendance for both the plant tour and the July 2 meeting.
The tour encompassed most areas of the plant and was informative. Most of .
the plant structures are in place and completed.
observed that need to be completed are as follows: Structures and equipment Dry cooling tower - This cooling tower acts as a heat exchanger for the component cooling water system. It consists of 20 bays spanning an area approximately equal to a football field and about 20 feet high. The tower uses radiative cooling (fans) to cool the component cooling water system. The structure is about 20% complete.
The containment dome rebar is in place but no concrete has been poured.
l The containment construction hatch has not been sealed.The hatch is expected to be sealed in September and gross leak tests will be perfonned.
equipment.
Sealing this hatch will enhance the preservation of Several piping runs and supports have to be completed.
There estimated is about 2.5 million 6.0 million feet of cable installed out of an feet required.
Other aspects of the plant status are as follows:
4 kv busses are energized from 230 kv power supplied by Bonneville Power Administration.
l Mo ' m umen Fpuwer supplica I
(, e c..c , / -- sing resistive loading.
The lant has hi-density fuel racks.
GOB 01oo42850717 ADOCK 05000508 F )('
~ Yopps
i -
7 -
t 8 The Colt diesels rated at 7200 kw. have never been run.
The control room is manned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> with 2 men on eachSome shift.
of the instruments in the control room are energized.
The preventive maintenance requirements of various eauipments, the structural material corrosion program and the temperature-humidity monitoring program in place at the plant were highlighted throughout the tour. These measures are described in Appendices A, 8, C and 0 of the WPPSS Preventive February 20, 1985, Maintenance Program WMC-051, Revision 2, i
j On July 2,1985, WPPSS presented the Project Status of WNP-3 (Enclosure 2),
the Design 4),
(Enclosure Readiness Review (Enclosure 3) and the Preservation Program I i
The WNP-3 readiness reviews will be documented in about 13 design review topic reports and 13 construction review topic reports. '
review, piping and supports, is scheduled to be submitted to the NRCThe first design in January every 1986 and 3-4 months other design review reports are scheduled to be submitted thereafter.
to be submitted to the NRC in July 1986The first construction report is scheduled In response to a question by J. B. Martin about the importance of documenting the plant's design and construction status, WPPSS stated that '
as contracts were completed records were assembled and checked for completeness by WPPSS/EBASCO. They estimate that plant design documentation is over 99% complete.
documentation and thought that this should also be one of the mainJ. B. M emphasis of a readiness review program.
The design review program (Enclosure 3) was described by George A. Block, Engineering Assurance Manager. The design review pro after the South Texas Engineering Assurance Program.This grameffort will bewill patterned take less man-hours than the readiness review program at Vogtle. One of the reasons for a lesser expenditure of effort is that all the FSAR comitments for a
! particular topic area will not be identified. Only when a topic area is ,
analyzed will the FSAR comitment applicable to that analysis be identified to i
assure that the comitment has been met.
Page 10 and 11 of enclosure 3 show a flow diagram of the process. The procedures for each of the boxes on page 10 are being developed and will be submitted to NRC for review. Also by IE on the design review program,(Enclosure 5).WPPSS will reply to questions raise One question raised by T. Novak at the meeting was the apparent absence of a detailed organizational structure for the conduct of the review. WPPSS said that they would respond to this question.
l
,3-The Preservation Program was described by Art Kohler Acting Program Cirector for WNP-3. Enclosure 4 is a sumary of his preser.tation. Highlights of his discussion are as follows:
The supply system has discussed the preservation p~rogram with the manufacturers of equipment and has taken their recomendations into consideration.
WPPSS has been in a preservation mode since WNP-1 was c6ncelled, which is about 3 years.
Insurers also inspect equipment and structures on a monthly basis to assess their condition. The inspection takes several days.
WPPSS has talked to INPO and INP0 has talked to EPRI about equipment preservation. EPRI is planning an October workshop and is also conducting a telephone survey on equipment preservation.
WPPSS is waiting for the following with regard to the readiness review program.
1 A response to the May 22, 1985 letter, D. Mazur to W. Dircks, which requested approval of the WNP-3 and WNP-1 readiness review program.
This letter has been drafted and is in W. J. Dircks' o'ffice.
- 2. A letter approving the design assurance program plan.
WEP3S submitted a letter, June 3,1985 describing their Design Raview Program, G. Sorenson to J. Martin. The staff has requested additional infomotion with regard to that program (See enclosure 5).
- 3. A letter appresing the preservation program.
WFPSS submitted the preservation program, May 24, 1985 A. Kohler to J. Mar *.in. The staff had questions with regard to the program pir.n and WPPSS responded in a letter dated June 28, 1985 G. Sorenson to J. Partin.
h b*
Theodore S. Michaels, Sr. Project Manager Licensing Branch No. 3 Division of Licensing cc: See Next Page s
4 i e
- i. .
a >
July 17,1985 cc w/ encl:
H. L. Thompson, Jr F. J. Miraglia G. W. Knighton B. K. Singh G. T. Ankrum cc w/o encl:
J. L. Milhoan W. M. Hill R. T. Dodds J
! DISTRIBUTION Central File [
SEP8 Reading TMichaels
+
i i
1 e
l SEPB:0L
! TMicha s:lt 07/,7/85 l
l
g4* 3 ~
UNITfD STATl!S d
,8 ' ,, g NUCLcAR REEULATORY COMMISSION ENCLOSURE 1 2 naamu v g
Q'+,*....g;, 1450 MAMIA LANE. SUITE 210 WALNUT CREEK. CALIFORhlA 94596 Meeting Agenda l Licensee: Washington Public Power Supply System '
Facility: Washington Nuclear Project No. 3 '
License No.: CPPR-154 Docket No.: 50-508 Date and Time of Meeting: July 2,1985 at 8:30 a.m.
Location of Meeting: Elma, Washington Purpose of Meeting: Review Readiness Review Program modules for plant preservation and engineering design.
Opening: Jack Martin, Regional Administrator, RV
Introduction:
Don Mazur, Managing Director, WPPSS Readiness Review Overview: Jack Garvin, Program Manager Readiness Review WPPSS Engineering Design Review Program: , George Block, Engineering Assurance Manager, WPPSS Preservation / Preventative Maintenance Program: Art Kohler, Director of Projects,WPPSS Other Attendees NRC Bob Dodds, Chief, Reactor Project Section 1 Bill Hill, Senior Engineer Jim Milhoan, Chief, Licensing Section, Quality Assurance Branch Tom Novak, Assistant Director for Licensing Ted Michaels, Project Manager Greg Cook, Public Affairs Officer, RV WPPSS Bob Glasscock, Director, Licensing and Assurance Dewey Hulbert, Assistant Program Director for Engineering and Staff The public will be given an opportunity to question or offer comments at the conclusions of the meeting.
-- 7 - - - --- a _____-------
, , . ENCLOSURE 2 PROJECT STATUS WNP 1250 MWE PWR e CONETRUCTION STARTED APRIL 11, 1977 ENGINEERING 90% COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION 761 COMPLETE l e AE: EsASc0 SERVICES. INC.
e NSSS: COMBUSTION ENGINEERING s CM: E8ASCO SERVICES. INC.
e MULTIPLE CCHSTRUCTION CONTRACTORS e EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY FROM JUNE. 1983 o PLANT IN PRESEP.VATION STATUS FOR RESUMPTION OF CONSTRUCTION e ENGINEERINGl00cUMENTATION/ LICENSING CONTINUITY MAINTAINED e NRR PREPARATION OF DRAFT SER l
i
._ -. _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ , _ . . . . _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _ . _ __ _ ._ _s
PROGRAM DURING EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY PLAN FOR EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY WAS DEVELOPED FOR EACH PLANT - REFINED EACH YEAR.
FY-85 WNP-3 ANNUAL BUDGET $59.1M MANPOWER LEVEL (SITE) 402 ACTIVITIES e PLANT PRESERVATION AND MAINTENANCE e CON 30LIDATION AND VERIFICATION OF RECORDS e ENGINEERING CONSOLIDATION AND COMPLETION e LICENSING CONTINUITY,AND FOLLOW THROUGH e CONTRACT CONSOLIDATION AND CLOSE OUT e RESTART PLANNING AND PREPARATION e PROJECT ENHANCEMENT STUDIES
w ---- u.- ---
]
f READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM WHAT IS IT:
e A SERIES OF REVIEWS TO ASSESS THE ADEQUACY OF AN ACTIVITY.
e FOR THE SUPPLY SYSTEM THE SERIES OF REVIEWS ENCOMPASS THE IMPLEMENTATION OF ALL ASPECTS OF DESIGN, CONSTRUCTION AND PREPARATION FOR OPERATIONS.
e PROGRAM HAS SUPPLY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT INVOLVEMENT.
ALONG WITH NRC PARTICIPATION.
WHAT DOES THE PROGRAM ACCOMPLISH 7 e GIVES MANAGEMENT ADDITIONAL ASSURANCE THAT QUALITY-RELATED PR08 LENS HAVE BEEN DETECTED.
e PROGRAM GIVES CONFIDENCE AS THE WORK PROGRESSES. .
k e PRECLUDES SURPRISES AT THE END OF CONSTRUCTION. ,
f
. b t
1 l
t F
L
. i
, READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM GOALS l e WHEN A REVIEW IS COMPLETED AND ACCEPTED. ALL IS$UES RELATED TO THAT SUBJECT WILL HAVE BEEN ;
ADDRESSED AND ANSWERED.
e FSAR AND SER QUESTIONS FINISHED.
- r I
I
4 - -- .4 a + 9 q 2 a .w - 4 - g _
t 8 '
g 8 0 8
'(
CURRENT ACTIVITIES ,
i e NO CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITY - SOME SMART WORK TO HELP PRESERVATION f / <- I hr.dasc/.,si.)dJ4.l.a e n t< . . . +- e .
l e SOME DESIGN ON-GOING O
e DESIGN STATUSING BEING CONDUCTED e PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED I
e NO PREPARATION FOR OPERATION f
L h
1 i -
I t f e
1
i 9
INITIAL PHASE . s o
e REVIEW OF WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.
l 1
e FOCUS ON DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION PROCESSES AND ON -
THE PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION.
4
- e. SAMPLE PRODUCTS OF THESE PROCESSES AND DRAW CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEWS.
GOAL: REVIEW FOR ACCEPTANCE. THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION THAT HAVE BEEN COMPLETED TO DATE. THE RESUI,.T3 0F THE INITIAL PHASE WILL BE THE FIRST INCREMENTAL ACCEPTANCE OF THE PROJECT.'
l l
0 t _
~
, o -
s' 3 .
. SECOND PHASE e REVIEW OF CONTROL SYSTEMS PUT IN PLACE TO COMPLETE CONSTRUCTION.
e REVIEWS WILL BE CONDUCTED TO INCREMENTALLY ACCEPT THE PROJECT WORK AS IT PROGRESSES TOWARD LICENSING AND FUEL LOAD.
6 DETAILS OF THE SECOND PHASE WILL BE DISCUSSED BEFORE RESTART OF CONSTRUCTION.
e EQAL: COMPLETION OF THE SERIES OF REVIEWS WILL RESULT IN AN SER WITH NO OUTSTANDING QUESTIONS.
4
. - - . - - , _-. -m ,--- - . , - - , - . - - - - - - -
m-,- - = +o+----- - - - - - - - , . - -- --
4 s, *
-)
SUPPLY SYSTEM GD3 NESS BEVIEt! PROGRAM SINCE OUR PROJECTS ARE NOT-CURRENTLY'UNDER CONSTRCCTION.-
QUR REVIEW PROGRAM MUST BE DIVIDED INTO TWO PHASES.
e INITIAL PHASE- -
TO BE ACCOMPLIS!!ED BEFORE RESUMFTION OF CONSTRUCTION.
h e SECOND PHASE -
BEGINS FOLLOWING RESUMPTION d
0F CONSTRUCTION AND IS COMFLETE PEFORE OPERATING i ,
LICENSE.
\
s s
s /
MANAGING DIRECTOR DEPUTY MANA6ING DIRECTOR I I I DIRECTOR DIRECTOR DIRECTOR ENGINEERING PROJECTS LICENSING & ASSURANCE PROGRAM PROGRAM MANAGER DIRECTOR READINESS REVIEW e READINESS REVIEW GROUP REPORTS TO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.
INDEPENDENT OF THE PROJECT.
, , , N -s a e a
w READINESS REVIEW
, ORGANIZATION PROGRAM MANAGER L. J. GARVIN f f f f f f f t * , e , , ,
LICENSING ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION MANAGER ASSURANCE MANAGER ASSURANCE MANAGER G. C. Sorensen G. A. Block L. J. Garvin
( Acting) l l
~
l .
l o USING INDIVIDUALS fiATRIXED FR0!i GTHER CORPORATE GROUPS.
i l
I
, . . s,. ,
I l
DESIGN ASSURANCE e SAMPLES DESIGN e DRAWS CONCLUSIONS FROM THE RESULTS OF THAT REVIEW AND FROM THE RESULTS OF ALL THE DESIGN REVIEWS.
e GETS FEEDBACK FROM THE RESULTS OF THE REVIEW OF CONSTRUCTION AND PRESERVATION.
e , DETAILS TO BE DISCUSSED LATER.
i.
. 7
, . j l
CONSTRUCTION ASSURANCE
- e SAMPLE EACH CONTRACTORS WORK.
e SAMPLE SIZE DEPENDENT ON NATURE AND AMOUNT OF WORK.
HISTORY OF CONTRACTOR AND THE RESULTS OF ANY SPECIAL PRO 6 RAMS.
e REVIEW WILL CONSIST OF REINSPECTION /WALKDOWNS USING THE SAME CRITERIA AS USED FOR CONSTRUCTION INSPECTIONS.
e WALKDOWNS INCLUDE DESIGN ENGINEERS -
TO ASSESS EFFECT OF OTHER CONSTRUCTION.
e ADEQUACY AND IMPLEMENTATION OF PRESERVATION.
WILL ALSO BE REVIEWED.
e DEFICIENCIES WILL BE DOCUMENTED AND RESOLVED.
e THE NEED FOR INCREASED SAMPLING WILL BE BASED UPON THE NUMBER AND SIGNIFICANCE OF DEFICIENCIES.
e DETAILS OF PROGRAM TO.BE PROVIDED BY AUGUST 1985.
l s APPROVAL OF PROGRAM DESCRIPTION IS REQUESTED BY OCTOBER 1985.
i
0 .
- l PRESERVATION e PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OF EQUIPMENT STARTS UPON RECEIPT OF AN ITEM. ,
e PRESERVATION PROGRAM IMPLEMENTED AT THE TIME DELAY WAS ANNOUNCED. STILL ON-GOING.
e DETAILS TO BE DISCUSSED BY A. D. KOHLER.
i
~
l .
1 l
l O
- v -
q SCHEDULE
, LONG TERM DESIGN REVIEW START -
JULY 1. 1985 FIRST REPORT TO NRC - JANUARY. 1986 REVIEW REPORTS SUBMITTED TO NRC EVERY 3-4 MONTHS THEREAFTER.
CONSTRUCTION REVIEW START -
JANUARY 1986 FIRST REPORT TO NRC - JULY. 1986 REVIEW REPORTS SUBMITTED TO NRC EVERY 2-3 MONTHS
( THEREAFTER.
1 l
l l
4
,~ ,
~
ENCLOSURE 3 l
l I
1 WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW 1 l
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 3 f
JULY 2. 1985 i
t l
l-l l 1 07/02/85 l
- - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - - - -
.,_. _ . . , , - _ . . . . , - - ~ - - . - - - -
. l e = l l
WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PURPOSE:
TO INCREASE CONFIDENCE IN THE DESIGN OF THE WNP-3 PLANT AND TO PROVIDE A DOCUMENTED BASIS FOR THE ACCEPTANCE. BY BOTH SUPPLY ,
SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND THE NRC. OF THE COMPLETED DESIGN OF WNP-3.
(1) NEAR TERM ACCEPTANCE OF DESIGN COMPLETED TO DATE PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION RESTART.
(2) FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED DESIGN BASED ON AN ONGOING DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS RATHER THAN A LAST-MINUTE MAJOR EFFORT.
I 2 07/02/85
a .
6 O
" I w z 3 O
< O M CL. H W E 2 < Z CW < Ck: H Ck: Z E <
.6 H ::l3 Q Z )
Z W H .
C4 = cal: M H H W A 3 zM Z ,
W 2 H W 2 I E = Z CD W c W M CK J Z CO M < at: O W D 2 H cn O O
- WW (4 CD W ClE H H
- 2 Z O 2 Ch M M 2 2 W 2 C 4 :l3 Z C < 6 E 6 O M LaJ C 3 :3 A H J w = < r < Z H Q O CA O
> c 6 O M H M l.LJ Z O 6 2 H E <
- M W <
2 (4 O ll= M CO _J CD W LaJ LaJ J CO < M CE Q. M l.LJ O Ch 3 C/3 6 O Z MW H C 2 H 2 c O O O O Z 2 2 W O
< O c CE . < O W m
l.LJ WW H z Z H H Co C3 LaJ
< CD ::3 C/3 2 I CE
- 2 O LaJ C J CD C/3 M W Q H < W E 3' th ::3 CO H LaJ eC J 1.AJ t/3 2 H C2: H O e C WM Co C .4
- 2 2 J :>= = Ch M C M G3 Z C/3 W H 2 M I E a4: C2: O O H Q W
- 4 to M cn at:
Z CD C W M H J J 3 ch H H Z < < J
< Z M CD z O ==:
M C/3 M CD H 2 H 2 C/3 M 6 CD C/3 O C/3 W W C/3 M M Z MW Z Q WU C/3 M H O H QW W O Ck: 6 Q. C J Z :ll3 C/3 O 6 Co 4 mO LaJ Q H O
- e. 6 C/3 cn to r3 Z M Z Ch l=. C/3 2 < Ch CD 2 6 <
- O to 4 J >
M CD C Q. LaJ D LaJ & Z Ch M E O C O C/3 Q.
W C/3 :>= O 4: O O CD Ct:
C WH + O 6 C2: C2: 2 < _J C LaJ H E M CL CL. M LaJ *W:
>= M Z LaJ LaJ 3 J D 2 LaJ Qll amC H LaJ LaJ < O H as: Z < J l= 2 3 Z Qll D O J H lll> CL. H M H i=== c Z *E:
CL CE as: C C C O O W
O D
Z 3 07/02/85
a: WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW ,
0 THE DESIGN OF A NUCLEAR PLANT IS A COMPLICATED AND PRECISE ACTIVITY TYPICALLY SPANNING MANY YEARS.
O THE DESIGN PROCESS IS PROCEDURALIZED AND DOCUMENTED TO ENSURE CONSISTENCY AND TO 1 AVOID DEPENDENCE ON HUMAN MEMORY.
M O THE PROCESS IS CHECKED BY AN INDEPENDENT QUALITY ASSURANCE ORGANIZATION TO DETECT ANY DEVIATION FROM PROCEDURAL CCHMITHENTS.
O AS AN ADDED HEASURE. THE SUPPLY SYSTEM HAS CREATED AN ORGANIIATION SEPARATE FROM BOTH THE PROJECT AND QUALITY ASSURANCE GROUPS.
O THE NEW ORGANIZATION IS STAFFED WITH SENIOR TECHNICAL PERSONNEL WHO CAN RECOGNIZE GOOD OR BAD DESIGNS OR PRACTICIES.
O THE STAFF IS INDEPENDENT OF THE PROJECT.
s 0 THE INDEPENDENT STAFF REVIEWS THE PRODUCTS OF DESIGN IDRAWINGS. SPECIFICATIONS AND HARDWARE). AND THE DESIGN PROCESS THAT CREATED THE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS. AND '
REPORTS ON THE RESULTS OF THOSE REVIEWS.
l 0 ANY PROCESS OR PRODUCT DEFICIENCIES ARE CORRECTED.
C)
I d g3 0 AN INDEPENDENT (NON-SUPPLY SYSTEM) OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE MONITORS AND REPORTS ON THE
! g; INTEGRITY OF THE PROGRAM.
u, i
. 3 WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW DESIGN REVIEW PARTICIPANT REQUIREMENTS 0 DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF INDEPENDENCE FROM PROJECT AND/OR MAJOR CONTRACTORS.
O NOT' INVOLVED IN ORIGINAL DESIGN EFFORT FOR TOPIC BEING ADDRESSED.
O QUALIFIED BY TRAINING / EXPERIENCE AS EXPERTS IN THE SUBJECT UNDER REVIEW.
O EXPERIENCED / QUALIFIED IN CONDUCTING SIMILAR REVIEW EFFORTS.
O TEAM LEADER REPORTS TO CORPORATE MANAGEMENT.
2,,, y pig et ;- n ei run h<,.i 5
07/02/85
g g h 9
6 D W
e E
O H
2 w M
- E W M M >
H H
- M M
> Z Z w H W < O M O E W H M M w W J H < b W W D 4 m W W M H w o W H Z Z >
- 2 O w M C H U E H w C w O H
< O c 4 w <
W w A J H w E H N E J M U T M M C 2 M 2 O Z U- H W M C H e E w c w H M O < K w 2 2 M E O E M E w w W W w e w A >
C > E O Z O w M O E & H Q M M - A 2 2 i H 6 E M C
- A Z C O 4 A H Z w Z E H M Z 3 e < M e 2 w w .
= w o < M E E w M D E A 3 w A 2 O A M w H o w < M O M U M <
C J H 6 M > > W Z Z Z A M o H H w b o 4 M E E M E O M E E O > < E E H w < H A C 6 A 4 A w . 2 2 M w O > O E O w J w H w E H Z O H H O Z M C w H E H @ H M M O A M < > w > m H 6 E A O E 2 O O O M 3 4 4 4 C 4 M M O 3 E N D E M o w w O C C O w w w M J w w O 2 w Z O M M M Z C E < C H U M < 6 H < A O < O <
K A J J w E J J >
O M M <
Q 3 3 I I I I I I Z O O O O
.6 07/02/85
-x _
WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM DESCRIPTION - GENERAL APPROACH O TWO PHASES h
0 PHASE I - DESIGN COMPLETED TO DATE F BASELINE (DESIGN COMPLETED STATUS) f DESIGN PROCESS REVIEW DESIGN PRODUCT REVIEW r
DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION INTERFACE REVIEW INTERIM REPORT / CONCLUSION w
0 PHASE II - DESIGN THROUGH COMPLETION DESIGN PROCESS CHANGE REVIEW ONGOING DESIGN PRODUCT REVIEW CONSTRUCTION / TESTING FEEDBACK REVIEW FINAL REPORTICONCLUSION i
l l
07/02/85 7
- WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PHASE I 1
(JULY 1985 TO RESTART)
O COMPLETE THE SYSTEM DESIGN STATUSING PROGRAM NOW UNDER-WAY. THIS ESTABLISHES A BENCHMARK FOR EACH SYSTEM TO IDENTIFY DESIGN WORK COMPLETED TO DATE.
O PERFORM A SERIES OF INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEWS TO SAMPLE THE PRODUCT OF DESIGN PERFORMED TO DATE. THIS PROVIDES CONFIDENCE IN PRODUCT AS STATUSED.
O REQUESTED NRC INVOLVEMENT ENDORSEMENT OF THE PROGRAM PLAN FINAL ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED WORK 0 OPTIONAL NRC INVOLVEMENT l
ENDORSE REVIEW TOPICS l
REVIEW SCOPE OF SELECTED REVIEWS PARTICIPATE ON SELECTED REVIEWS l
REVIEW RESULTS. FOLLOWUP ACTION ATTEND " EXIT" MEETINGS MONITOR TRACKING AND CLOSURE OF FINDINGS l
8 07/02/85
. . m, WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW PHASE II (RESTART TO FUEL LOAD) 0 ONGOING INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW 0 ONGQINIFbDBACKFROMCONSTRUCTIONREVIEW J' .
O PREOPERATIONAL 'ESfING RESULTS REVIEW
/ .
O TRACKING AND CLOSE0VT OF OPEN ITEMS 0 ONGOING INVOLVEMENT OF NRC O FINAL REPORT PROVIDING BASIS FOR ACCEPTANCE. BY BOTH SUPPLY SYSTEM MANAGEMENT AND THE NRC, OF THE COMPLETED DESIGN l
i i
l l
l 9 07/02/85
,' . 8
~
ENGINEERING ASSURANCE i PROGRAM
- if
~
TOPIC SELECTION ,
if .
PARTICIPANT SELECTION l .
'r
.l DEV. REVIEW PLAN l
I 1r
. ENTRANCE MTG -
! I lf PERFORM 1 l REVIEW I
I lf THIRD PARTY EXIT MEETING REVIEWS I
1 f 1f ASSEMBLE DRAFT REPORT v 90 DAYS k REVIEW DRAFT WITH EAP MNGR
. (SIGN FOR APPROVAL) 1f PRINT, DISTRIBUTE &
l i FILE BARE REPORT (W/O DISPOSITIONS) if TRACKING
> SYSTEM If if if lf (TS)
AVAILABLE AT FILE AT TO NRC CORPORATE (F) PROJECT
'I 1r if l
l l
7/02/85 l 10
)
, e 5
- TRACKING '
? SYSTEM l
. If k f (TS)
. AVAILABLE AT FILE AT TO NRC CORPORATE (F) PROJECT 1f i l
EAP IWNGR DISCUSSES WITH QA & PROJECT RE:
N N ARS RESPONSE RE
! -ggggy 50 g.3 % CORRECTIVE ACTIONS.
. ; q.55(e)'S .g ETC. & INTERFACES WITH q CORPORATE 1I ,
TRANSMIT ISSUES n'S & 55(e)*S -
TO NRC ISSU'ES RESPONSE DOCU.
ISSUES OFR'S k MENT TO CORPORATE JL i U (F)
OA TRACKS CORPORATE REVIEWS
- RESPONSES REPORTABLES _
l 1f l (F) i ' CORP.ASSEMB. l D N SINtt PONSE l APOE FOLLOWS UP ON ACTION ROLL.UP DOC l TRANSMIT TO ITEMS NRC (DIRECTOR AP.
PROVAL)
_l i
_. __ _ _ _ j _ _ TRACKING t TRACKING (PROJ)
! 4 -
PERIODIC UP. (EAP) Y l
I DATES TO NRC 4 _ _ _ _ _ _Y &
! (OA)
I l
l l
7/02/85 11 i
l
WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW P0TENTIAL INDEPENDENT DESIGN REVIEW TOPICS (EXAMPLES)
O SYSTEM INTERACTION REVIEWS 0 PIPING / HANGER DESIGN REVIEW 0 SYSTEM DESIGN REVIEW 0 ELECTRICAL DESIGN REVIEW 0 STRUCTURAL DESIGN REVIEW -
0 MISCELLANEOUS REVIEWS 0 SPECIAL REVIEWS BASED ON CONSTRUCTION REVIEW RESULTS 0 EQUPMENT QUALIFICATION PROGRAM REVIEW 0 HUMAN FACTORS DESIGN REVIEW f
0 4 - 5 TOPICS SELECTED WITHIN i - 2 MONTHS
[ 0 APPROXIMATELY 13 TOPICS REVIEWED OVER A PERIOD OF l ABOUT 3 YEARS l
12 07/02/85 w
.J
)
~ ,
. 1 l
en VJ W
Z N
C W
m o E
W <
Z m W (D O
(3 cc 2 A M
M W D E C W (f)
A W D m 3 A 5 O w J W H J Z *
.l> C W LJ I 6
& H g 2 Z CO O W W
W h 6 E m
Z m 3 H W < <
Q W 4 % m Z W . < <
& Q Z o
- 5 -
w e
H > a m 1 M O W W % m C b A w w
M J l < W 1 M Z Z H w 3 z E w a
& W C W A W Q
m C O w &
C C t
W W
& H l 4 <
l lllD 2 J J W W W
- W i
53 3 CD l W J H a l
a >
L W a.
t 3 m 3
(
O O l
l 13 07/02/85 t
I WNP-3 DESIGN READINESS REVIEW .
3? .
SUMMARY
OBJECTIVES .
O TO ESTABLISH AND MAINTAIN INCREASED CONFIDENCE IN THE ADEQUACY OF OVERALL DESIGN ACTIVITIES.
O TO OBTAIN NRC CONCURRENCE THAT THE PROGRAM WILL MEET ITS OBJECTIVES IF CARRIED OUT )
AS PROPOSED.
0 TO OBTAIN NRC ACCEPTANCE OF COMPLETED WORK IN INCREMENTS.
O TO MAINTAIN HIGH PROGRAM INTEGRITY AND CONTINUED NRC INVOLVEMENT SO THERE WILL BE NO NEED TO REVISIT THE SAME SUBJECTS (UNLESS CHANGES OCCUR).
O TO ALLOW SUPPLY SYSTEM AND NRC ACCEPTANCE OF THE TOTAL PLANT DESIGN UPON COMPLETION OF ALL DESIGN, BASED ON THE ONGOING INCREMENTAL ACCEPTANCE OF WORK DURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THIS PROGRAM.
i i
l l
SS B
S 8
, , m s i l
THE MAINTENANCE AND PRESERVATION PROGRAMS CONTAIN SEVERAL
' ~
LAYERS OF DETAIL:
i >
i
. i
" SUPPLY SYSTEM WNP-3 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND PRESER-VATION PROGRAM" SERVES AS Ti1E OVERALL CONTROL DOCUMENT.
(PROVIDED TO THE NRC ON JUNC 28, 1985.)
WMC-051. " PRESERVATION or ASSETS - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM" CONTAINS BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE.
(PROVIDED TO THE NRC ON MAY 24. 1985).
s SPECIFIC PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE EQUIPMENT.
. COMPONENTS. AND SYSTEMS AT THE P.LANT. (AVAILABLE AT THE PLANT) l l
I e
. . s
, ENCLOSURE 4 1
WNP-3 PRESERVATION PROGRAM 4
OVERVIEW
.f20AL: TO PROVIDE THE CONTROLS SUCH THAT EQUIPMENT. SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS. AT THE WNP-3 PROJECT. ARE MAINTAINED AND PRESERVED IN AN ACCEPTABLE CONDITION DURING THE CONSTRUCTION DELAY.
i l
l l
t i
n, ~ -
PROGRAM CONTROLS o PROGRAM CONTROLS DERIVED FROM QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM DESCRIPTIONS IN F5AR.
e BOTH THE OPERATIONAL QUALITY ASSURANCE TOPICAL AND DESIGN / CONSTRUCTION QA PROGRAM APPLY.
e 4
O h
l 1
l l
l l
4 P
9
- - - . _ c_ . . , . ._ . __ _ __
. . m q ,
REQUIREMENTS WMC-051 " PRESERVATION OF ASSETS - PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM" .
e PROGRAM DOCUMENT THAT PROVIDES BASIC REQUIREMENTS FOR GENERAL CLASSES OF EQUIPMENT.
e BASED UPON MANUFACTURERS RECOMMENDATIONS.
EXPERIENCE. NATIONAL STANDARDS. ETC.
6 APPROVED BY EaASc0 AS AE. AND THE SUPPLY SYSTEM.
e CHANGES TO WMC-051 WILL BE MADE AS EXPERIENCE IS GAINED.
BUT ONLY AFTER ENGINEERING APPR,0 VAL.
6 D
e
=% I E
l WNP-3 PRESERVATION' ORGANIZATION CHART ! -
! ~
, SUPPLY SYSTEM l EBASCO '
l -
WNP-3 PROGRAM DIRECTOR l l <
l DEPUTY PROGRAF 1 DIRECTOR l l
l PROJECT. -------------------------
l ./
QA l ,.
E l- .
l
. PLANT l MANAGER l PROJECT l GENERAL MANAGER l
- OPS -----------------
- l .--------- 0A l l l l l l TECilNICAL MAINTENANCE reauitements MANAGER HANAGER
j------------------- Cit AE l .
.)
l f, , 4 - l -,
p4,f l s.h re los. y e CilART CONTAINS ORGANIZATIONS HAVING PERFORMING l RESPONSIBILITIES. ' -
CHART 1 l
l l
l l -
l
^
'8 7 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE (PM) PROGRAM ADMINSTRATION e
SPECIFIC PROCEDURES AND INSTRUCTIONS DEVELOPED FOR EACH TYPE OF EQUIPMENT. '
a REQUIREMENTS ENTERED INTO COMPUTER SYSTEMS. (THE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE AND CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE COMPUTER SYSTEMS ARE INTERACTIVE.)
e COMPUTER SYSTEM PRODUCES HARD COPY OF REQUIREMENTS -
AS SCHEDULE DICTATES. '
s WORK IS PERFORMED. DOCUMENTED AND REVIEWED BY '
SUPERVISOR.
[
e.
COMPLETION DATA AND COMMENTS ENTERED BACK INTO COMPUTER
[ SYSTEMS.
l I
LATE REPORTS GENERATED BY COMPUTER IF COMPLETION DATA NOT ENTERED.
l I
1 s.h
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE o WHEN FROBLEMS.ARE IDENTIFIED MAINTENANCE WORK REQUESTS ARE WRITTEN.
$ WHEN - OllRING PM on AT ANY OTHER TIME.
4 DV WHO - ANYONE CAN WRITE Aa MWR.
9 MWR - DESCRIBES THE PROBLEM AND IS ROUTED 10 MAINTENANCE FOR EESOLUTION.
e REVIEWED, AliO WOL.7 POIhTS, ESTABLISHED BY-QA.
i 4 WORK IS PERF0,RMED. INSPECTED. DOCUMENTED AND REVIEWED BY SUPEEVISI0lb i
e DATA ENTERED INTO MW1 GoMPUTER SYSTEM.
l 8 HARD COPY FILED.
1 e
e - - - - - - - -- ----_-._-_- -
q ,
h
~
k
-VERIFICATION ACTIVITIES l
9 QUALITY CONTROL. WHICH IS PART OF OPERATIONAL QA.
, CONDUCTS HOLD POINT INSPECTIONS.
L l
L 1
6 l
l l
l
{
i l
W l.-.
, , q v
'1 l
THE PROJECT HAS ESTABLISHED MONITORING PROGRAMS TO PROVIDE DATA TO CONFIRM THE ADEQUACY OF THE MAINTENANCE PROGRAM OR TO PROVIDE THE BASIS FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO THE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS.
9 STRUCTURAL MATERIAL CORROSION MONITORING e ATMOSPHERIC CORROSION TEST RACKS IN THE FIELD AND PLANT BUILDINGS.
e COUPONS ARE MONITORED FOR GALVANIC AND PITTING CORROSION.
e COUPONS REPRESENTATIVE OF PLANT MATERIALS.
a /
i CORROSION DATA IS USED TO:
e PROVIDE EARLY NOTIFICATION OF DEGRADING CONDITIONS SUCH THAT CORRECTIVE ACTIONS CAN BE TAKEN.
e QUANTIFY DEGRADATION TO VERIFY THAT STRUCTURAL INTEGRITY OF CONSTRUCTION MATERIALS HAS NOT BEEN COMPROMISED.
e PROVIDE ASSURANCE THAT CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES CAN RESUME WITH EXISTING STOCK MATERIAL.
e PROVIDE A QUANTITATIVE BASIS FbR THE EVALUATION AS TO THE ACCEPTABILITY OF THE PLANT TO RESTART CONSTRUC-TION ACTIVITIES. ..
l RESULTS ARE FEDBACK TO PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS TO MINIMIZE DEGRADATION.
l 1
i l ..
l .
q-
-m HYGR0 THERM 0 GRAPH MONITORING ,
0 TEMPERATURE-HUMIDITY MONITORING.
8 INDICATES THE ENVIRONMENT THAT EQUIPMENT. SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS HAVE EXPERIENCED.
e DATA PROVIDES:
I s EARLY WARNING OF UNACCEPTdBLE CONDITIONS THAT COULD LEAD TO DEGRADATION. .
9 INPUT TO MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR CORRECTIVE MEASURES.
e RECORDS OF ACTUAL EXPOSURE EXPERIENCED BY PLANT COMPONENTS AND SYSTEMS.
l -
i 1
m .
l __ _. - -- _ - _ . , . -. ., -. _.
-