Letter Sequence Request |
---|
|
|
MONTHYEARML20140C3201984-06-14014 June 1984 Responds to NRC 840504 Request for Addl Info to Support Util 830714 Request for Approval to Dispose of Very Low Radwastes.Info Will Be Submitted by 840730 Project stage: Request ML20138E4431985-09-30030 September 1985 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Re 830714 Request for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste.Proposed Action Will Have No Significant Impact on Human Environ Project stage: Other ML20138E4111985-10-15015 October 1985 Advises That 830714 Request to Dispose of Dredgings from Onsite Settling Basins on company-owned Land Acceptable. Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact Encl Project stage: Other ML20198C2741985-11-0202 November 1985 Provides Lake Erie Basin Committee Comments on 851009 Environ Assessment & Finding of No Significant Impact.Nrc Insistence on Offsite Disposal of Dredgings from Settling Basin at Facility Demanded Project stage: Other ML20198C9311985-11-0505 November 1985 Petition of Save Our State from Radwaste for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Project stage: Request ML20209H2271985-11-0606 November 1985 Petition of Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy & SA Carter for Leave to Intervene & Request for Adjudication Hearing. Intervenors Oppose Util Petition to Bury Low Level Radioactive Dredgings Onsite.W/Certificate of Svc Project stage: Request ML20138R3221985-11-10010 November 1985 Requests Hearings & Leave to Intervene on Listed Specific Issues of Fact & Law Re NRC Current Consideration for Approval of Procedure for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste Proposed by Util.Corrected Ltrs Encl Project stage: Other ML20138R3191985-11-10010 November 1985 Requests 1-day Extension for Comments,Due to NRC Related Business Project stage: Other ML20210A5181985-11-10010 November 1985 Request for Hearings & Leave to Intervene on Behalf of Western Reserve Alliance Re NRC Current Consideration for Approval of Procedure for Disposal of Low Level Waste Proposed by Toledo Edison Co Project stage: Request ML20210A4821985-11-10010 November 1985 Requests Waiver of Time Period for Comments for 1 Day Due to NRC-related Business Project stage: Other ML20138S0331985-11-13013 November 1985 Requests That Public Hearing Be Initiated & Util Proposal for Permanent Low Level Radwaste Disposal Site on Land Adjoining Plant Near Port Clinton,Oh Be Denied.Proposal Irresponsible Project stage: Other ML20138P5841985-12-17017 December 1985 Requests NRC Rescind Approval for Disposal of Radwaste at Plant Site.Served on 851223 Project stage: Other ML20140B9351986-01-26026 January 1986 Forwards Certified Resolution 10-1986 Passed by Council of City of Euclid,Oh on 860121,opposing Util Application for Permission to Bury Radioactive Sludge at Facility.Served on 860124 Project stage: Request ML20205K4821986-02-17017 February 1986 Resolution 86-10 (Effective 860217) Opposing Util Application to Bury Radioactive Sludge at Site.Served on 860226 Project stage: Request ML20137X4081986-02-24024 February 1986 Expresses Deep Concern Over Application Filed by Util to Bury Radioactive Sludge at Facility.Resolution 86-8,opposing Application,Adopted by Council on 860217 Encl.Served on 860305 Project stage: Other ML20215D5861987-06-12012 June 1987 Response of Intervenors to Decision of Administrative Judges Hoyt & Kline on 870415 to Allow Low Level Radwaste on Davis-Besse Site.* Great Lakes Area People Should Not Be Stuck W/Amateur Handling of Radwastes.W/Certificate of Svc Project stage: Other 1985-11-06
[Table View] |
|
---|
Category:INTERVENTION PETITIONS
MONTHYEARML20101M7061992-06-30030 June 1992 Applicant Answer in Opposition to Amended Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene Out of Time.* City of Brook Park Untimely Intervention Petition Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101E1261992-06-15015 June 1992 Amended Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene Out of Time.* City of Brook Park Should Be Granted Discretionary Intervention & Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Granted for Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20083B7901991-09-16016 September 1991 Answer of Util to Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene & Suppl Thereto.* Petition Should Be Denied Based on Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20083B3581991-09-0404 September 1991 City of Brook Park Suppl to Petition for Leave to Intervene.* in Consideration of Foregoing,Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene Should Be Granted. W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20082G8921991-07-31031 July 1991 Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene.* City Requests That NRC & ASLB Deny Applicant Request for Hearing.W/Svc List & Certificate of Svc ML20082D4411991-07-10010 July 1991 Supple by American Municipal Power-Ohio,Inc to Petition for Leave to Intervene.* Facility Requests Addl Time to Mod Suppl.W/Certificate of Svc ML20082B5111991-07-10010 July 1991 10CFR2.714(b)(1) Suppl to Conditional Petition to Intervene of City of Cleveland,Oh Submitted in Connection w/910725 Prehearing Conference.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20082B2511991-07-0303 July 1991 Petition of Util for Leave to Intervene.* If License Conditions Can Disappear & Reappear W/Shifting Economics of Electric generation,AMP-Ohio Future Will Be Seriously Jeopardized.W/Certificate of Svc ML20077G2661991-05-30030 May 1991 Petition of Alabama Electric Cooperative,Inc for Leave to Intervene.* Util Requests Intervention in Further Proceedings on Applications of Ohio Edison & Other Applicants.W/Certificate of Svc ML20195E8551986-05-28028 May 1986 Petition for Leave to Intervene in Matter of Contamination of Navarre Marsh,Toussaint Creek & Lake Erie by Util.Served on 860606 ML20197G7621986-05-13013 May 1986 Response Opposing Licensee 860428 Brief Opposing 851110 Petition for Hearings & Intervention Procedure for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste at Facility.Util Request Should Be Denied.Affidavits Encl ML20197G7401986-05-0606 May 1986 Petition of Save Our State from Radwaste,Consumers League of Ohio,A Gleisser & Gs Cook for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Served on 860513 ML20155G8131986-04-30030 April 1986 Appeal of Denial of G Zatroch 860408 Petition to Intervene. Petitioner Resides 53 Miles from Facility,Within Zone of Interest & Alleges That Injury Will Probably Result.Served on 860505 ML20155G6891986-04-29029 April 1986 Licensee Response to State of Oh 860414 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Petition Should Be Dismissed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205N3781986-04-28028 April 1986 Response Opposing Save Our State from Nuclear Wastes, Consumers League of Ohio 860411 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20210N7121986-04-28028 April 1986 Responds Opposing Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy & SA Carter 851105 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Petition Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.W/Certificate of Svc ML20205N3241986-04-28028 April 1986 Response Opposing Petition of Western Reserve Alliance for Leave to Intervene in Proceeding Re Low Level Radwaste Burial.Petition Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20210K7511986-04-25025 April 1986 Response Opposing Petition of PE Dornbusch for Leave to Intervene.Suggests That Petition Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.Dornbusch Ltr Fails to Comply w/860310 Memorandum & Order.W/Certificate of Svc ML20141H1931986-04-22022 April 1986 Response Opposing Citizens for Land & Water Use 860411 Petition for Leave to Intervene.Petitioner Failed to Plead Admissible Contention to Identify Deficiencies in Licensee Method of Low Level Waste Disposal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20203B3231986-04-16016 April 1986 Petition of Save Our State from Nuclear Wastes,Consumers League of Ohio,A Gleisser & Gs Cook for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing on Radioactive Sludge Disposal Issue. Served on 860416 ML20155E8571986-04-14014 April 1986 Petition of State of Oh for Leave to Intervene as Party. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 860417 ML20203B3501986-04-14014 April 1986 Petition of Ef Feighan for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Util Proposal to Store Low Level Radioactive Sludge Onsite.Served on 860416 ML20203A0261986-04-11011 April 1986 Petition of Citizens for Land & Water Use,Inc for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Util Request to Bury Low Level Radioactive Dreggings Onsite.Served on 860415 ML20202J8231986-04-0808 April 1986 Petition of G Zatroch for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Radioactive Sludge Disposal at Plant Site.Served on 860415 ML20210A5181985-11-10010 November 1985 Request for Hearings & Leave to Intervene on Behalf of Western Reserve Alliance Re NRC Current Consideration for Approval of Procedure for Disposal of Low Level Waste Proposed by Toledo Edison Co ML20209H2271985-11-0606 November 1985 Petition of Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy & SA Carter for Leave to Intervene & Request for Adjudication Hearing. Intervenors Oppose Util Petition to Bury Low Level Radioactive Dredgings Onsite.W/Certificate of Svc ML20198C9311985-11-0505 November 1985 Petition of Save Our State from Radwaste for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing ML19330A8191980-07-25025 July 1980 Response in Opposition to City of Cleveland,Oh 800609 Request for Hearing Re Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 800513 Order.Filing,Requesting Tariff W/Ferc, Brings Controversy to End W/O Litigous Course ML19329D4681973-06-0202 June 1973 Petition for Leave to Intervene.Certificate of Svc & Affirmation of E Stebbins Encl ML19326B0621973-05-30030 May 1973 Petition & Affidavit for Leave to Intervene in Facility OL Proceedings.Issuance of License Should Have Conditioned Requirement That Utils Grant Facility Participation Through Ownership Participation or Through Unit Power Sales ML19326B2381973-04-26026 April 1973 Utils' Answer to Amended Petition to Intervene of Coalition for Safe Nuclear Power.Organization Failed to Submit Suitable Petition to Intervene.Petition Should Be Denial. Certifiate of Svc Encl ML19329D4141973-04-16016 April 1973 Coalition for Safe Nuclear Power Amended Petition to Intervene.Petition Should Be Granted.Petition Encl 1992-06-30
[Table view] Category:RESPONSES & CONTENTIONS
MONTHYEARML20101M7061992-06-30030 June 1992 Applicant Answer in Opposition to Amended Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene Out of Time.* City of Brook Park Untimely Intervention Petition Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20101E1261992-06-15015 June 1992 Amended Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene Out of Time.* City of Brook Park Should Be Granted Discretionary Intervention & Amended Petition for Leave to Intervene Granted for Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20083B7901991-09-16016 September 1991 Answer of Util to Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene & Suppl Thereto.* Petition Should Be Denied Based on Listed Reasons.W/Certificate of Svc ML20083B3581991-09-0404 September 1991 City of Brook Park Suppl to Petition for Leave to Intervene.* in Consideration of Foregoing,Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene Should Be Granted. W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20082G8921991-07-31031 July 1991 Petition of City of Brook Park,Oh for Leave to Intervene.* City Requests That NRC & ASLB Deny Applicant Request for Hearing.W/Svc List & Certificate of Svc ML20082D4411991-07-10010 July 1991 Supple by American Municipal Power-Ohio,Inc to Petition for Leave to Intervene.* Facility Requests Addl Time to Mod Suppl.W/Certificate of Svc ML20082B5111991-07-10010 July 1991 10CFR2.714(b)(1) Suppl to Conditional Petition to Intervene of City of Cleveland,Oh Submitted in Connection w/910725 Prehearing Conference.W/Certificate of Svc & Svc List ML20082B2511991-07-0303 July 1991 Petition of Util for Leave to Intervene.* If License Conditions Can Disappear & Reappear W/Shifting Economics of Electric generation,AMP-Ohio Future Will Be Seriously Jeopardized.W/Certificate of Svc ML20077G2661991-05-30030 May 1991 Petition of Alabama Electric Cooperative,Inc for Leave to Intervene.* Util Requests Intervention in Further Proceedings on Applications of Ohio Edison & Other Applicants.W/Certificate of Svc ML20195E8551986-05-28028 May 1986 Petition for Leave to Intervene in Matter of Contamination of Navarre Marsh,Toussaint Creek & Lake Erie by Util.Served on 860606 ML20197G7621986-05-13013 May 1986 Response Opposing Licensee 860428 Brief Opposing 851110 Petition for Hearings & Intervention Procedure for Disposal of Low Level Radwaste at Facility.Util Request Should Be Denied.Affidavits Encl ML20197G7401986-05-0606 May 1986 Petition of Save Our State from Radwaste,Consumers League of Ohio,A Gleisser & Gs Cook for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Served on 860513 ML20155G8131986-04-30030 April 1986 Appeal of Denial of G Zatroch 860408 Petition to Intervene. Petitioner Resides 53 Miles from Facility,Within Zone of Interest & Alleges That Injury Will Probably Result.Served on 860505 ML20155G6891986-04-29029 April 1986 Licensee Response to State of Oh 860414 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Petition Should Be Dismissed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205N3781986-04-28028 April 1986 Response Opposing Save Our State from Nuclear Wastes, Consumers League of Ohio 860411 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20210N7121986-04-28028 April 1986 Responds Opposing Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy & SA Carter 851105 Petition for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing.Petition Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.W/Certificate of Svc ML20205N3241986-04-28028 April 1986 Response Opposing Petition of Western Reserve Alliance for Leave to Intervene in Proceeding Re Low Level Radwaste Burial.Petition Should Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20210K7511986-04-25025 April 1986 Response Opposing Petition of PE Dornbusch for Leave to Intervene.Suggests That Petition Be Treated as Limited Appearance Statement.Dornbusch Ltr Fails to Comply w/860310 Memorandum & Order.W/Certificate of Svc ML20141H1931986-04-22022 April 1986 Response Opposing Citizens for Land & Water Use 860411 Petition for Leave to Intervene.Petitioner Failed to Plead Admissible Contention to Identify Deficiencies in Licensee Method of Low Level Waste Disposal.W/Certificate of Svc ML20203B3231986-04-16016 April 1986 Petition of Save Our State from Nuclear Wastes,Consumers League of Ohio,A Gleisser & Gs Cook for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing on Radioactive Sludge Disposal Issue. Served on 860416 ML20155E8571986-04-14014 April 1986 Petition of State of Oh for Leave to Intervene as Party. W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 860417 ML20203B3501986-04-14014 April 1986 Petition of Ef Feighan for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Util Proposal to Store Low Level Radioactive Sludge Onsite.Served on 860416 ML20203A0261986-04-11011 April 1986 Petition of Citizens for Land & Water Use,Inc for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Util Request to Bury Low Level Radioactive Dreggings Onsite.Served on 860415 ML20202J8231986-04-0808 April 1986 Petition of G Zatroch for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing Re Radioactive Sludge Disposal at Plant Site.Served on 860415 ML20210A5181985-11-10010 November 1985 Request for Hearings & Leave to Intervene on Behalf of Western Reserve Alliance Re NRC Current Consideration for Approval of Procedure for Disposal of Low Level Waste Proposed by Toledo Edison Co ML20209H2271985-11-0606 November 1985 Petition of Toledo Coalition for Safe Energy & SA Carter for Leave to Intervene & Request for Adjudication Hearing. Intervenors Oppose Util Petition to Bury Low Level Radioactive Dredgings Onsite.W/Certificate of Svc ML20198C9311985-11-0505 November 1985 Petition of Save Our State from Radwaste for Leave to Intervene & Request for Hearing ML19330A8191980-07-25025 July 1980 Response in Opposition to City of Cleveland,Oh 800609 Request for Hearing Re Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 800513 Order.Filing,Requesting Tariff W/Ferc, Brings Controversy to End W/O Litigous Course ML19329D4681973-06-0202 June 1973 Petition for Leave to Intervene.Certificate of Svc & Affirmation of E Stebbins Encl ML19326B0621973-05-30030 May 1973 Petition & Affidavit for Leave to Intervene in Facility OL Proceedings.Issuance of License Should Have Conditioned Requirement That Utils Grant Facility Participation Through Ownership Participation or Through Unit Power Sales ML19326B2381973-04-26026 April 1973 Utils' Answer to Amended Petition to Intervene of Coalition for Safe Nuclear Power.Organization Failed to Submit Suitable Petition to Intervene.Petition Should Be Denial. Certifiate of Svc Encl ML19329D4141973-04-16016 April 1973 Coalition for Safe Nuclear Power Amended Petition to Intervene.Petition Should Be Granted.Petition Encl 1992-06-30
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20198L1911998-12-21021 December 1998 Submits Comments Re Proposed Rule to Revise 10CFR50.59, Changes,Tests & Experiments ML20198L1361998-12-15015 December 1998 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50.65 Re Requirements for Monitoring Effectiveness of Maint of NPP ML20217J2161998-03-27027 March 1998 Comment on Proposed Generic Communication Re Lab Testing of nuclear-grade Activated Charcoal ML20217F5361998-03-25025 March 1998 Comment Opposing Draft Regulatory Guide DG-1071, Std Format & Content for Post-Shutdown Decommissioning Activities Rept ML20199J4651998-01-22022 January 1998 Comment Opposing Draft RG-1070, Sampling Plans Used for Dedicating Simple Metallic Commercial Grade Items for Use in Npps. RG Unnecessary Based on Use of EPRI Guideline & Excellent Past History of Commercial Grade Items at DBNPS ML20148M6421997-06-17017 June 1997 Comment on Proposed NRC Bulletin 96-001,suppl 1 Re Control Rod Insertion Problems.Nrc Should Review Info Provided in Licensee 970130 Submittal & Remove Statements of Applicability to B&W Reactors from Suppl Before Final Form ML20134L3401997-01-22022 January 1997 Resolution 96-R-85, Resolution Supporting Merger of Centerior Energy Corp & Ohio Edison Under New Holding Co Called Firstenergy ML20133B6941996-12-18018 December 1996 Submits Ordinance 850-96 Re Approval of Merger of Centerior & Oh Edison Into Firstenergy ML20132A8461996-12-0202 December 1996 Resolution 20-1996 Supporting Merger of Ohio Edison & Centerior Corp Under New Holding Company Called Firstenergy ML20134M6191996-10-28028 October 1996 Proclamation of Support by City of Sandusky,Oh Re Merger of Ohio Edison and Centerior Energy Corp ML20108D9571996-05-0303 May 1996 CEI Response to City of Cleveland 2.206 Petition.Nrc Should Deny Petition ML20097G5731996-02-13013 February 1996 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-63 Re Use of Potassium Iodide ML20097B8721996-01-23023 January 1996 Petition of City of Cleveland,Oh for Expedited Issuance of Nov,Enforcement of License Conditions & Imposition of Appropriate Fines,Per 10CFR2.201,2.202,2.205 & 2.206 ML20101B5841996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement Or,In Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures.W/Certificate of Svc ML20097B8911996-01-23023 January 1996 Motion of City of Cleveland,Oh for Partial Summary Judgement or in Alternative,For Severance of Issue & Expedited Hearing Procedures ML20096E9781996-01-0808 January 1996 Comment on Proposed Suppl to GL 83-11, Licensee Qualification for Performing Safety Analyses in Support of Licensing Actions ML20087J3611995-08-14014 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR2 Re Rev of NRC Enforcement Policy ML20086M8241995-06-29029 June 1995 Comment on Proposed Review of NRC Insp Rept Content,Format & Style ML20083M8701995-05-10010 May 1995 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Primary Reactor Containment Leakage Testing for Water-Cooled Power Reactor ML20081C8841995-03-0303 March 1995 Comment Re NRC Proposed Generic Communication Suppl 5 to GL 88-20, IPEEE for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities. Util Ack NRC Efforts to Reduce Scope of GL 88-20,but Believes That Proposed Changes Still Overly Restrictive ML20077M5831995-01-0404 January 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Shutdown & low-power Operations for Nuclear Power Reactors ML20072K3611994-08-16016 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Plans for Storage of Sf at Davis Besse NPP ML20072K4411994-08-14014 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Dry Storage of Nuclear Waste at Facility in Toledo,Oh ML20072K5261994-08-12012 August 1994 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR72 Re Addition of Standardized NUHOMS Horizontal Modular Storage Sys to List of Approved Sf Storage Casks ML20072B1581994-08-0909 August 1994 Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR72 on List of Approved Spent Fuel Storage Casks:Addition ML20029D8221994-04-19019 April 1994 Comments on Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Codes & Stds for Nuclear Power Plants;Subsection IWE & Subsection Iwl ML20062M4011993-12-28028 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20046A9561993-07-19019 July 1993 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR170 & 171, FY91 & 92 Proposed Rule Implementing Us Court of Appeals Decision & Rev of Fee Schedules;100% Fee Recovery,FY93. ML20056C8951993-07-19019 July 1993 Order Extending Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of LBP-92-32.W/Certificate of Svc. Served on 930720 ML20045F8321993-06-22022 June 1993 Comment on Proposed Rule 10CFR26 Re Mods to fitness-for-duty Program Requirements.Concurs W/Proposed Rule in Reducing Random Testing Rate of Licensees to 50% & Disagrees W/ Maintaining Random Testing Rate of 100% for Vendors ML20044E2781993-05-13013 May 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re VEPCO Petition to Change Frequency of Emergency Planning Exercise from Annual to Biennial ML20044E1561993-04-29029 April 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-50-58 Re Frequency Change of Emergency Planning Exercises ML20127L8781993-01-19019 January 1993 Comment Supporting Comments Submitted by NUMARC Re Draft Reg Guide DG-1020 ML20127A6171993-01-0606 January 1993 Order.* Time within Which Commission May Rule on Petitions for Review of Board Order LBP-92-32,dtd 921118,extended Until 930208.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 930106 ML20126D5801992-12-23023 December 1992 NRC Staff Answer in Response to Petitions for Review Filed by Oh Edison Co,Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co,Toledo Edison Co & City of Cleveland.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20126F6501992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of City of Cleveland,Oh,Intervenor,In Opposition to Petitions for Review of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* Petitioners Petitions for Review Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126D5171992-12-23023 December 1992 City of Brook Park Answer to Petitions for Review.* Opposes Applicants 921208 Petitions for Review Based on Fact That ASLB Decision in proceeding,LBP-92-32,adequately Addressed Issues Raised in Petitions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D5461992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co & Toledo Edison Co to Limited Petition for Review of City of Cleveland,Oh of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* Commission Should Deny City of Cleveland Petition.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D5781992-12-23023 December 1992 Answer of American Municipal Power-OH,Inc in Opposition to Petitions for Review of Oh Edison Co & Cleveland Electric Illuminating Co/Toledo Edison Co.* W/Certificate of Svc ML20126D4761992-12-22022 December 1992 Alabama Electric Cooperative Answer to Applicants Petitions for Review.* Applicants 921208 Petitions for Review Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126A5461992-12-10010 December 1992 Order.* Requests That Answers to Petition for Review Be Filed No Later than 921223.W/Certificate of Svc.Served on 921210 ML20126A5751992-12-0808 December 1992 Petition for Review.* Requests That NRC Review LBP-92-32, 921118 Board Decision in Proceeding.Board Erroneously Interpreted Section 105(c) of AEA by Ignoring Fundamental Underpinning of Statute.W/Certificate of Svc ML20126A5871992-12-0808 December 1992 Petition for Review.* Requests That NRC Review ASLB 921118 decision,LBP-92-32.Board Erroneously Interpreted Section 105(c) of AEA by Ignoring Fundamental Underplanning of Statute.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20126A7651992-11-18018 November 1992 Limited Petition for Review of City of Cleveland,Oh of 921118 Decision of Aslb.* City of Cleveland Petition for Review Should Be Granted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20115E1771992-10-0808 October 1992 Comment Supporting Draft Mgt Directive 8.6,GL 92-05 ML20105C8971992-09-16016 September 1992 Comment Opposing Proposed Generic Communication Re Generic Ltr Concerning analog-to-digital Replacements Under 10CFR50.59 ML20114A8841992-08-17017 August 1992 Designation of City of Brook Park,Oh of Adopted Portions of Summary Disposition Pleadings.* Brook Park Not Advancing Any Addl Argument or Analysis in Connection W/Designation,Per 920806 Memorandum & Order.W/Certificate of Svc ML20099E1821992-07-28028 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 61 Re LLW Shipment Manifest Info & Reporting ML20099A4051992-07-17017 July 1992 Comment on Proposed Rules 10CFR20 & 50 Re Reducing Regulatory Burden on Nuclear Licensees.Supports Rules ML20101R4831992-07-0808 July 1992 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Receipt of Byproduct & Special Nuclear Matl 1998-03-27
[Table view] |
Text
,.
o
- XvCf w: te t.
. Western Reserve Alliance '85 NOV 13 AlkgElern Reserve Alliance 1616 P. Street-N.W. 10916 Magnolia Drive Suite 160 ,n ,: , Cleveland, Ohio 44106 Washington, D.C. 200036 hac . N;c ,; :
3 ?;;x-November 10,1985 Mr. Gus C. Lainas Assistant Director for Operating Reactors Division of Licensing Secretary of the Commission U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Attention: Docketing and Service Branch
Dear Sir:
Please consider these documents, formal comments and requests for hearings and leave to intervene on behalf of the Western Reserve Alliance in regard to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's current consideration for approval of a procedure for the disposal of low-level radioactive waste proposed by the Toledo Edison Company. The Cleveland Electric Illuminating Compnay (CEI) and Toledo Edison (TE) are the licensees for the Davis-Besse Nuclear
~ Power Station Unit No.l. located in Ottawa County, Ohio. Although the unit is operated by TE, CEI is the majority owner of the plant.
Currently North Holding Company's (" North") has filed an application before the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) requesting an order of the Commission approving its acquisition of all of the outstanding common stock of CEI and TE.
The Western Reserve Alliance is a non-profit consumer utility corporation which was incorported under the laws of the State of Ohio on May 25,1978. It is a non-profit charitable corporation recognized by the Internal Revenue Service as having tax-exempt 4
status under 501(c)(3) of the federal income tax code. It is engaged in the education of people and organizations regarding energy issues. It serves the area of Northern Ohio. It has been-an intervenor in numerous cases against utility companies, including CEI, since its inception.
We request hearings and leave to intervene on the following identified specific issues of fact and law.
1.
hp DO K O 6 l
G
The NRC, CEI and TE must and answer the question how much radioactivity has already flowed out of Davis-Besse's radwaste settling basins into' Lake Erie? Table 1. on page 41266 of the Federal Register Vol. 50, No.196 Wednesday, October 9,1985 is misleading. .From Table 1, it is possible to calculate the amount left in the sludge is 8.5 millicuries:
5 -3 g 8.8x10 -12(pico)Cfx28317ff3x6800ff2x edging =8.5x10 d edging 8.5 millicuries.is a sizeable amount of radiation to be dumped on an area about 58 square feet [3400(max) ft2]. The radioisotopes in Table 1. all emit penetrating 1'-radiation and their halflives range from 0.2 to 30 years. One thus can estimate the radiation exposure of a person standing on the dredgings would be around 260 times higher than the pdlic is led to believe by looking at the estimaths in Table 1.. This higher figure in because there are 8760 hours0.101 days <br />2.433 hours <br />0.0145 weeks <br />0.00333 months <br /> per year (not 100) and the sludge is to be at least 61 cm(2') deep not 10 cm.
Th' NRC, CEI and TE errored in making their calculating only from-the top of the material is wrong. The NRC, CEI and TE failed to consider travel through wind, water and other factors.
The NRC, CEI and TE errored on page 41267 of the Federal Register Vol. 50-No. 196 when it states:
" Based on the Commission staff's review of the proposed sludge
-disposal. the staff concludes that:
(1) The dose to members of the public as a result of exposure to radion from the disposed dredgings will be well below regulatory
-limits and very small in comparison to does members of the public receive each' year from exposure to natural background radiation. At the time of decommissioning of the nuclear power plant, the land on which the sludge is disposed is capable of being released for unrestricted use."
This rush to release this radioactive land for unrestricted use does not take into consideration such things as 100 day occupancy or sensitive individuals such as children and pregnant women. Would it not be possible for one to receive as much as 270 milirems per year if one lived on the sitel There does not seem to be an acknowledgement of what the total actual releases from all sources at the Davis-Besse plant have been and how the current proposal for disposal of low-level radioactive waste would add to that total. The NRC, CEI and TE have not proven that the current proposal for disposal of low-level radioactive waste will result in no harm especially in light of the routine dumping of other radioactive material in the lake and other areas.
2.
The NRC, CEI and TE errored by not fully detailing there proposal for a permanent radioactive waste disposal site near Davis-Besse inthe Federal Register but instead refers to a 1983 proposal from TE to the NRC. Is the NRC, CEI and TE telling the public that this 1983 proposal has not changed in anyway? Is'the site protected from flooding
'that Davis-Besse has been subjected to in the past?
The NRC,CEI and TE errored by seeking simultaneous advance approval for operation of a radwaste disposal site and for release of the site for unrestricted use when Davis-Besse is decommissioned. The reason for such inappropriate requests can be found on page 41266 of the Federal Register, Vol. 50, No. 196 Wednesday, October 9,1985.
Under the heading, The Need for the Proposed Action: the last sentence in-this section states,"Onsite disposal of the dredgings also would be less costly than off-site disposal at licensed burial sites."
Once again the economic strain on both CEI and TE because of their misguided nuclear programs is again tempting the NRC CEI and TE f
to violate the promise- they made to the public in the Final Environ-mental Statement Related to Operation of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 (NUREG-75/079). An approval of the permanent radioactive waste disposal site near Davis-Besse is not only another example have how the NRC, CEI and TE are violating the promise made to the public in the environmental statement but it is an example of how North Molding Company's attempt to acquire all of the outstanding common stock of CEI and TE is affecting public safety and past promises made to the pubic. It is just one example of why North's s atements that they do not need approval of the NRC is not in the publi c interest.. The NRC has an obligation to see if the current and future operations of CEI and TE will be affected by North's attempt to acquire all of CEI's and TE's common stock.
Hearings before the House Subcommittee on Energy Conservation and Power.have shown a long history of NRC laxity of enforcement of the NRC own standards in regards to the Davis-Besse plant. The NRC's current statement on page 41267 of the Federal Register Vol. 50. No. 196 Wednesday, October 9,1985 that says " Alternative Use of Resources: The principal results of this action involving the use of resources not previously considered in the Final Environmental Statement Related to Operation of Davis-Besse Nuclear Power Station Unit 1 (NUREG-75/079) is the minor change in land use associated with operating support facility. This change in land use is not significant." is a false statement. The simultaneous advance approval for operation of a permanent radioactive waste disposal and release of the the same site for unrestricted use when Davis-Besse is de-comissioned is not "the minor change in land use associated with l operating support facility." This is even more true given the past ack c credibility of North, CEI, TE and the NRC.
3.
Given North's, CEI's and TE's precarious, financial, political and regulatory situations due mainly to their misguided nuclear programs it is very reasona ble to raise the idea that the whole story regarding factual, legal and other questions have not been stated in the Federal Register notice of 10/9/85 in regards to the simultaneous advance approval for operation of its radwaste disposal site and the release of the site for unrestricted use.
Given the past lack of credibilty on the part of North, CEI, TE , NRC and the laxity of the NRC in enforcing its own standards at Davis-Besse the Commission errored on page 41267 of the Fderal Registar, Vol. 50 No. 196/ Wednesday October 9,1985 where it states:
" Finding of No Significant Impact The Commission has determined not to prepare and environmental impact statement for the proposed action.
Based upon the foregoin g environmental assessment, the Commission concludes that the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the qual.ity of the Human environment."
Given the lack of credibilty of the above mentioned groups and the current amounts of radiation being released into the environment >
around the Davis-Besse plant an environmental impact statement needs to be prepared.
For these and other reasons we request hearings and leave to intervene . We contend taking into account factors not raised in the Federal registers notice the NRC's statementsthat the proposed action will not have a significant effect on the qualilty of the human environment is not true.
The NRC has already granted CEI and TE scores of requests for modifications in NRC guidelines. The NRC must grant the public the right to have hearings and to intevene in this matter as it involves a significant increase in the probability or consequences or an accident previoulsy evaluated: or creatr the possibility of a new or dif ferent kind of accident fromany accident previously evaluated and involves a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
We have complied with 10 CFR 2.714 because we have shown that we are a public interest group with a history of interventions against utilities including CEI. Our jnterest in educating the public on energry issues in the public interest makes a party to the proceeding and the publics property, financial, health and other public interest concerns are reached here in the most serious nature and extent possible. The possible effect of any order which may be entered in this proceeding would be to endanger the pulbic health and safety, the financial and political situation in the state of Ohio, the past promises made to the people of Ohio by the NRC, CEI and TE and other consumer interests.
Therefore we request that our requests for hearings and leave to intervene on these and other specific issues of facts and law.
Sincerely, Mk I Donald L. Schlemmer