(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
|
---|
Category:NRC TECHNICAL REPORT
MONTHYEARML20216F5141999-08-31031 August 1999 Rept on Status of Public Petitions Under 10CFR2.206 ML20056B0761990-07-31031 July 1990 Welding and Nondestructive Examination Issues at Seabrook Nuclear Station.An Independent Review Team Report ML20245E9921989-01-31031 January 1989 Problems W/Oils,Greases,Solvents & Other Chemical Matls, Engineeing Evaluation Rept AEOD/E901 ML20148B3291988-03-14014 March 1988 Headquarters Daily Rept for 880314 ML20196H6351988-03-0808 March 1988 Headquarters Daily Rept for 880308 ML20211K5451986-12-0505 December 1986 Draft Seabrook Station Steam Generator Tube Response During Severe Accidents ML20214R4851986-10-0909 October 1986 Initial OL Review Rept for Seabrook Station Unit 1 ML20214R1971986-08-28028 August 1986 Emergency Planning Zone Sensitivity Study Review Plan ML20238D5441983-06-21021 June 1983 Rept of Interview W/Jv Padovano,Pullman Higgins Employee Re Alleged Falsification of NDE Repts by Interviewee While Employed at Plant ML20238D5381983-05-24024 May 1983 Interview W/Ma Terpening,Pullman Higgins Employee Re NDE Work Performed by Padovano ML20238D4951983-05-23023 May 1983 Rept of Interview W/Jb Taylor,Pullman Higgins Employee Re NDE Issue at Plant ML20238D5351983-05-23023 May 1983 Rept of Interview W/Md Acree,Pullman Higgins Employee Re NDE Work Performed by J Padovano ML20238D5161983-05-23023 May 1983 Rept of Interview W/Cf Wilkins,Pullman Higgins Employee Re NDE Work Performed by Padovano ML20238D4991983-05-23023 May 1983 Rept of Interview W/Dm Daniels,Pullman Higgins Employee Re NDE Work Performed by Padovano ML20238F8391983-05-0404 May 1983 Morning Rept Re Licensee Identification of Nonconformance Concerning Questionable Conduct of Nondestructive Evaluation of Approx 2,400 Welds Performed by One Technician.Related Info Encl ML20245C8981983-04-18018 April 1983 Rept of Allegation Re J Padovano,Pullman-Higgins Technician, Signing Off on NDE Work in Turbine Bldg Not Actually Done IA-86-188, Rept of Allegation Re J Padovano,Pullman-Higgins Technician, Signing Off on NDE Work in Turbine Bldg Not Actually Done1983-04-18018 April 1983 Rept of Allegation Re J Padovano,Pullman-Higgins Technician, Signing Off on NDE Work in Turbine Bldg Not Actually Done ML20239A1761983-04-18018 April 1983 Partially Deleted Rept of Allegation Received from Anonymous Caller Stating That J Padovano Signing Off on NDE Work in Turbine Bldg That Was Not Performed ML20205A9341969-07-23023 July 1969 Rept to ACRS Seabrook Nuclear Station Unit 1 1999-08-31
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217H2841999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for Seabrook Station. with ML20212D1461999-09-17017 September 1999 SER Accepting Request to Use Proposed Alternative to Certain Weld Repair Requirements in ASME Boiling & Pressure Vessel Code ML20216F5141999-08-31031 August 1999 Rept on Status of Public Petitions Under 10CFR2.206 ML20212B8671999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Seabrook Station. with ML20210Q7581999-08-11011 August 1999 SER Approving Proposed Merger of CES & Bec,Which Will Create New Parent Company of Canal ML20210R9781999-08-0606 August 1999 ISI Exam Rept of Seabrook Station, for RFO 6,period 3 ML20210J8681999-08-0303 August 1999 SER Approving License Transfer from Montaup Electric Co to Little Bay Power Corp & Approval of Conforming Amend for Seabrook Station Unit 1 ML20210R6001999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20210H1151999-06-30030 June 1999 Naesc Semi-Annual Fitness-for-Duty Rept for 990101-0630 ML20209H1371999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20195G5391999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20195C0491999-05-25025 May 1999 Offshore Intake Seal Deterrent Barrier Design ML20206E4761999-04-30030 April 1999 LER 99-S01-00:on 990408,contractor Employee Was Granted Temporary Unescorted Access to Seabrook Station Protected Area.Caused by Failure of Contractor Employee to Provide Accurate Info.Individual Access Revoked.With ML20206N1751999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20196L2081999-04-19019 April 1999 Rev 01-07-00 to RE-21, Cycle 7 Colr ML20205K5441999-03-31031 March 1999 Decommissioning Update ML20205L8141999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Seabrook Station. with ML20205C1981999-03-24024 March 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Proposed Relief Request IR-8,Rev 1,provides Acceptable Alternative to ASME Code Requirements.Recommends Authorization of Proposed Alternative Pursuant to 10CFR50.55a(a)(3)(i) ML20207F4941999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for Seabrook Station. with ML20199E6731998-12-31031 December 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20198P1831998-12-31031 December 1998 LER 98-S01-00:on 981214,incomplete pre-employment Screening Records Was Noted.Caused by Failure of Contractor Employee to Provide Accurate Info.Subject Contractor Employees Employment Was Terminated.With ML20202E8241998-12-31031 December 1998 Naesc Semi-Annual Fitness-for-Duty Rept for 980701-981231 ML20196F5741998-12-0202 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Licensee Has Established Acceptable Program to Verify Periodically design-basis Capability of safety-related MOVs at Seabrook ML20198B8661998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20195D0311998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20154H5291998-10-0808 October 1998 Special Rept:On 980928,meteorological Monitoring Instrumentation Channel Inoperable for Period Greater than 7 Days.Caused by Vendor to Follow Std Industry Practice for Calibr of Instrumentation.Instruments Installed ML20154M8421998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for Seabrook Generating Station,Unit 1.With ML20151V5951998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1.With ML20237B4501998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Seabrook Station ML20236R1781998-06-30030 June 1998 Naesc Semi-Annual Fitness-for-Duty Rept for 980101-0630 ML20236M3591998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML20237A4871998-06-0303 June 1998 North Atlantic Seabrook Station 1998 Exercise on 980603 ML20248M2951998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML20247G2641998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Seabrook Station ML20247H3171998-04-27027 April 1998 Rev 1 to Seabrook Station SGs B & C Isi,May/June 1997 ML20216F8891998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Seabrook Station 05000443/LER-1998-002, Re Potential Safety Injection Pump Runout Conditions Identified on 980113.LER 98-002-00 Retracted1998-03-20020 March 1998 Re Potential Safety Injection Pump Runout Conditions Identified on 980113.LER 98-002-00 Retracted ML20216H9211998-03-13013 March 1998 Fitness for Duty Program Performance Data Personnel Subject to 10CFR26 ML20248L2811998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML20197A7531998-02-27027 February 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting License Request for Relief from ASME Code,Section IX Requirements Re Inservice Insp of RHR Heat Exchanger Nozzle Welds & Reactor Vessel Closure Head Nuts ML20202G3701998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for Seabrook Station ML20198G0271997-12-31031 December 1997 Commonwealth Energy Sys 1997 Annual Rept ML20248L7711997-12-31031 December 1997 Western Massachusetts Electric 1997 Annual Rept. Supporting Info,Encl ML20198G1021997-12-31031 December 1997 Baycorp Holdings 1997 Annual Rept ML20198N7021997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Seabrook Station, Unit 1 ML20198G0351997-12-31031 December 1997 Eastern Edison Co 1997 Annual Rept ML20198G0681997-12-31031 December 1997 Taunton Municipal Lighting Plant 1997 Annual Rept ML20248L7671997-12-31031 December 1997 North Atlantic 1997 Annual Rept ML20198F9511997-12-31031 December 1997 United Illuminating Co 1997 Annual Rept ML20236M9561997-12-31031 December 1997 Amended Public Service of New Hampshire 1997 Annual Rept 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
<
i 1
Report of Interview with Mr. Michael D. ACREE Michael D. ACRFE, Pullman Higgins (P-H) Level 2 Nondestructive Examination j (NDE) Technici6n, was interviewed by Investigator R. A. MATAKAS at Seabrook, j NH, on May 23, 1983. Investigator MATAKAS identified himself to ACREE by displaying his credentials. ACREE has worked at the Seabrook Station as a NDE Technician since January 24, 1983 and his supervisor is Ed BOWLES.
During the subsequent interview, ACREE provided the following pertinent in formation. *
{
Either in the latter part of March or early part of April 1983, he was requested by Ed E0WLES to examine some of the NDE work previously inspected l by James PAD 0VANO. One of the examinations involved a small stitch weld i l (No. C0-04044-01) on a saddle shaped pipe support and the second examina-'
tion involved two field welds (Nos. 0110and 0111), one on each side of a I
carbon steel line. Both jobs had allegedly been previously inspected by PAD 0VANO using the liquid penetrant (LP) method of NDE as indicated on f_ PADOVAN0's initial inspection report. When examined by ACREE, he could not find any signs that indicated that a previous LP inspection had been per-formed on either job. ACREE then performed a LP inspection on the stitch weld and determined that a meaningful LP inspection could not be performed I
on the weld because the weld condition caused a bleed over into the weld !
J which did not allow it to be properly interpreted.' In this case, a mag-l netic particle (MP) inspection would have been the appropriate method of NDE. !
- P-H NDE Level 2 Technician, Mike TERPENING, verified the weld condition i k and ACREE reported his findings to BOWLES. B0WLES told ACREE to talk l to PAD 0VANO to determine if PAD 0VANO had originally performed a MP examination for the job and mistakenly turned in a LP examination report. ACREE spoke to PAD 0VANO who stated essentially, that he thought he had cone a MP examina-tion and not a LP examination as he originally reported. ACREE reported l his conversation with PADOVANO to B0WLES who directed PAD 0VANO to go back l and inspect the weld using the MP NDE method. PADOVANO then asked ACREE l to do the MP inspection for him and ACREE refused. Later (same day), ACREE l i
( l
/
8709110238 870901 PDR FOIA GARDE 86-188 PDit Attachment 17, Page 1
'0O"R
+ .
3 .; ,
s asked PADOVANO if he had performed the MP inspection and PAD 0VAND answered
( affirmatively. ACREE then' reviewed. PADOVAN0's MP inspection report for the aforementioned job and noted that PADOVANO had accepted the weld.
On the following day, ACREE reexamined the weld along with Mike TERPENING and P-H NDE technicians Mark DANIELS and Terry STROMMER.. ACREE said there was a general agreement among the individuals reexamining the job that i there were no indications that a MP inspection had been performed on the previous. day by PADOVANO. There was " absolutely" no sign of any magnetic powder on either the weld' and surrounding area or the floor below. ACREE i reported this finding to B0WLES. During the middle and latter part of April 1983, ACREE was ' assigned to do some additional reinspection of- :
PADOVAN0's work along with P-H NDE technician Charley WILKINS. They re-inspected approximately 40 welds that were previously inspected and accepted by PADOVANO. During this reinspection, they found approximately 11 welds that had rejectable indications and in each instance "had tried to give j PAD 0VAND the benefit of any doubt." Based on ACREE's reinspection, it was his opinion that none of those welds that both he and WILKINS examined and i
( reinspected, had-ever been initially either LP or MP inspected as reported I by PAD 0VANO.
l ACREE was questioned regarding the site audit programs prior to this investiga-tion and advised that in the past, his work product has been audited by both l
-Yankee Atomic and the authorized nuclear inspectors on site but that he i has never been audited by P-H. '
Other than the information provided supra, ALREE said he was not aware of l any other actual or suspected falsification of records nor did he know of anyone in P-H management or supervision who may have such information.
i End of Report of Interview with Mr. !!ichael D. ACREE at Seabrook, NH.
Reported by: 0 s.I Richard A. listakas, Investigst Office of Investigations Field Office, Region I Attachment 17, Page 2
.__ - ___-_-_ - ____ -