IR 05000441/1987004

Insp Rept 50-441/87-04 on 870713-17.No Violations or Deviations Noted.Major Areas Inspected:Applicant Action Re Maint of Items in Facility on Extended Const Delay

ML20237H561
Person / Time
Site:	Perry
Issue date:	08/10/1987
From:	Keating D, Knop R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
To:
Shared Package
ML20237H542	List: IR 05000441/1987004 ML20237H538
References
50-441-87-04, 50-441-87-4, NUDOCS 8708170268
Download: ML20237H561 (5)

Text

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

E U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

REGION III

Report No. 50-441/87004(DRP)

Docket No. 50-441 License No. CPPR-149 Licensee: Cleveland Electric Illuminating Company Post Office Box 5000 Cleveland, OH 44101 Facility Name: Perry Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2 Inspection'At: Perry Site, Perry, Ohio Inspection Conducted: July 13-17, 1987 0. b O Mg/// /987 Inspector: D. E. Keating Datd ' '

Approved By:

hR.d'$

C. Knop M N t< hr Auau1Y /O,/987 Reactor Projects Section IB Date) '

Inspection Summary Inspection on July 13-17, 1987 (Report No. 50-441/87004(DRP))

Areas Inspected: Routine safety inspection by a regional inspector of the applicant's action concerning maintenance of items in Unit 2 on extended construction dela Results: In the area inspected, no violations or deviations were identifie The licensee's long term maintenance program is in place and was deemed adequately controlled. No safety problems were identified.

l

l 8708170268 870811 PDR ADOCK 05000441 Q PDR

.. .. . _ - _ _ .

- _ - - _- _ _ _ _

.4 DETAILS l l

l Persons Contacted

!

Cleveland Electric Illuminating (CEI)

• E. Riley, Manager, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department

• E. G. Sterle, Contracts Manager, Nuclear Construction Services Section- l D. Green, General Supervising Engineer Nuclear Engineering, Engineering l Department '

P. W. Begany, Contract Administrator Nuclear Construction Services Section  ;

E. Parker, Unit Supervisor, Nuclear. Quality Assurance Department M. R. Kritzer, Unit Supervisor, Nuclear Quality Assurance Department B. S. Ferrell, Operations Engineer, Licensing and Compliance Section i D. C. Jones, Operations Engineer, Licensing and Compliance Section '

G. D. Dunn, Compliance Engineer, Licensing and Compliance Section

• Denotes those attending the exit meeting on July 17, 1987. The inspector also contacted and interviewed other licensee And contractor personne . Licensee Action On Violations (92700) j (Closed) Level V Violation (441/87001-01)

Regarding the conditions discovered during a previous inspection, the inspector toured the Parmly Road laydown area to assess the licensee's corrective action taken, results achieved, and steps taken to prevent recurrence as indicated in the response to the Notice of Violation issue During the previous inspection, activities at the Parmly Road laydown area were not in conformance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XIII, as implemented by CEI's Project Maintenance Activity (PMA) progra The tour of the laydown areas indicated that the licensee's corrective actions appeared to be adequate. The piping in the Parmly Road laydown was placed on dunnage, elevated ends of pipe and couplings were cappe Pipe dunnage was sloped to permit drainage and air circulation. Safety related piping was segregated and being painted. Code numbers and information that was degraded has been transferred from the Code bands to the pipe with low stress stamps and witnessed by the Authorized Nuclear Inspector (ANI). If any part of the number or information was not clear, the pipe would either be designated as scrap or as non-safety related, depending on the conditio The pile of miscellaneous scrap metal had been remove The remaining items of plate, sheet, and miscellaneous structural steel were segregated and roped of Based upon these observations, this violation is considered close However, because of the licensee's commitment made in their response to the Notice of Violation to have all pipe spool pieces painted and capped on the high end by November, 1987, the corrective action taken and steps to prevent recurrence will be considered an Open Item (441/87004-01).

_ ___-_____ - __- _-_________ -

__ -

.

3. Licensee Performance On Extended Construction Delay (92050)

In addition to the walkdown of the Parmly Road laydown area, the inspector toured and walked-down the on-site laydown areas containing Unit 2 items such as structural steel, concrete reinforcing steel, pre-cast concrete duct banks, and beams. Also, the inspector toured another Unit 2 laydown area which was identified after the January 1987 inspection. This new laydown is located at the Fire Training Center. This area contained safety-related hatches, construction items, and temporary materia The conditions at all laydown areas were much improved since the initial inspection in January. A weed control substance had been applied on a regular basis to inhibit growt Signs and ropes identifying safety-related areas had been reinstalled and restrung. Structural girders were raised and set on their flanges and brace One end of each girder was elevated to promote drainage and eliminate free standing wate Safety-related items were identified and segregate The safety-related pipe spools and pieces are being cleaned and painted on' site. The inspector toured the on-site cleaning and coating facilit This is an automated operation. The spool pieces are placed on cribbing and passed through the sand blasting chamber and ':enveyed to the spraying and drying area. They are then stored for transport to the laydown are The non-safety related piping is being shipped off site to be cleaned and coated. Inspections are performed prior to shipping. Receipt inspections are performed when the material is returne The inspector toured the primary and secondary containments, including the auxiliary building and turbine buildin The uninstalled piping was capped at each end and on cribbing. All wooden and metal caps will be replaced with plastic caps. Anchor bolts have been coated and protected with wooden blocks. In the steam tunnel all pipes were capped, valves were covered and protected from rust, hangers were oiled and greased to prevent rusting. Sway struts were covered to prevent accumulation of dust and debris. The general area has been kept clea The inspector also toured various pump rooms and elevations in the auxiliary buildin In Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Pump Rooms A and B, the pump and valve components were clean and covered. Packing had been removed from the valve stems, and the flanges of the pumps, valves, and piping had been coated with a protective coating. The RHR heat exchangers were under a purge. The flanges of the pump casing and pumps were capped and coated. The Reactor Core Isolation Coolant (RCIC) pump and turbine were maintained in a protected environment. The RCIC turbine was in a heated cubicle. The flanges had been coated and capped. Humidity was controlled by desiccant indication. RCIC pump flanges were coated and cappe In the drywell and containment, all temporary carbon steel pipe supports associated with stainless pipe have stainless steel shims in place between the support collar and the pipe. All snubbers, hydraulic, etc.,

have been removed and are being maintained in the PMA warehouse.

f

i

. j

.

I

)

The inspector selected the following equipment in order to review the associated surveillance / inspection reports (SIR) and Field Storage Maintenance Requirements (FSMR):

• Residual Heat Removal (RHR) Pumps A and B - 2E12C002 A and B

• Water Leg Pump - 2E12C003 A and B 3

• RHR Heat Exchangers - 2E12B001 A, B, C, and D l

• Reactor Core Isolation Cooling (RCIC) Pump - 2E51C001 i

• RCIC turbine - 2E51C002

+ 24" Limitorque Motor Operated Valve

• Recirculation Pumps - 2B33C001 A and B {

• Recirculation Flow Control Valve - 2B33F025 A and B {

• Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Head - 2813D003

• RPV Head Strongback Carrousel - 2F13E009 {

The inspector verified that the required maintenance activities had been added to Section III of the PMA Program Manual. These include, but are not limited to, cabics in cabletrays (both safety and non-safety),

existing building structures, anchor bolts, rigid sway struts, U-bolts, constant and variable support hangers, mechanical shock arrestets, and crane The inspector, during the tour of the Unit 2 facility, noted the condition of unterminated cables. The bend radius of coiled cables were within the prescribed. limits of the Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers (IEEE) standards. Also, suspended cable coils were supported at the proper points to maintain the bend radius and minimize stress build-up and insulation damage. The inspector also verified that the trays were clean and free from debri The maintenance of the environment was achieved by controlling the humidity and by air circulatio Space heaters were located in various areas of the low portions of the secondary containment. Natural air circulation was enhanced by the use of large circulation fan Discussions were held with cognizant personnel regarding the frequency of certain inspection activities in certain areas as compared to the frequency in other areas. The examples sited were the annual inspections of the laydown areas, in particular, the Parmly Road site, and the monthly inspection activities for the Unit 2 facilitie The inspector questioned the basis for the determination of these frequencies. The licensee agreed that this was worth re-evaluating, and has since revised the Parmly Road surveillance and inspection period to monthly and the Unit 2 period to quarterl The Corporate Nuclear Quality Assurance Program has been approved and is in place. This is an upper tier document describing the PMA program and outlining the responsibilities of the key personne Prior to this official approval, the PMA was in place and operating under interim approva No violations or deviations were identified.

4 L >

~

..

4. Exit Interviews (30703) .

The inspector met with licensee representatives (denoted in Paragraph 1) -

throughout the inspection pericd and at the conclusion of the inspection on July 17, 1987. The inspector a;:: discussed the likely informational content of the inspection report with regacd to documents or processes reviewed by the inspector during the inspection. The licensee did not identify any such documents / processes as proprietary. The licensee acknowledged the inspection finding :-

l

mm L

i g .

. . . . . t a

_ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ . __ _ _ _ _ _ _