ML20203L855
| ML20203L855 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Satsop |
| Issue date: | 08/25/1986 |
| From: | Dick G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| To: | Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8608290241 | |
| Download: ML20203L855 (10) | |
Text
.
y k UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
, 3'( , g 5 j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 k.%
....4/ m 2sa Docket No.: 50-508 APPLICANT: Washington Public Power Supply System FACILITY: Washington Nuclear Project No. 3 (WNP-3)
SUBJECT:
TRIP REPORT - WNP-3 READINESS REVIEW MEETING The subject meeting was held on August 1, 1986 at the Region V offices. A list of the attendees is included as Enclosure 1. ,
The meeting was requested by the applicant to discuss the Construction Assurance Program (CAF) Module No.1, Earthwork (Enclosure 2). The applicant has completed the work on the module and wanted to get comments from the staff regarding the presentation and format of the report. A copy of the proposed Table of Contents is included as Enclosure 3.
A general overview cf the module review procedure was given by the applicant.
Each review team was made up of a team leader, discipline engineer, QA engineer, and two inspectors. A sampling plan for review of the records was developed to insure statistically significant samples. Review criteria were provided to the team inspectors who were to make no judgerrents. Perceived deficiencies were identified to the team leader and discipline engineer. They made the judgement. For each item that was determined to be a deficiency, documentation was prepared which included a discussion of the deficiency and how it was treated in the review. Since the Earthwork module is the first one to be submitted the applicant was encouraged by the staff to fully document the sampling and analytical methodology. In the event that there are questions, they can then be answered on the first submittal and the techniques can be used for future mcdules.
For each area reviewed, the applicant will identify all FSAR commitments. In the CAP modules, the comitment will be listed along with a listing of the construction specifications in which the FSAR commitments are implemented, and how the implementation was confirmed during the CAP review.
The CAP Module 1 is scheduled for submittal in mid September 1986.
There was also a short discussion about the Engineering Assurance Program (EAF)
Module 1, Piping and Pipe Support. The EAP Module 1 review is more complicated than the CAP Module 1 because only a small portion of the piping and pipe supports have been installed. Many of the drawing packages are not complete or have not incorporated the latest revisions. In late 1982, there was an audit of the constructor, EBASCO, which identified some deficiencies in the developmer.t of the drawings. While the problems were corrected on work done after the E608290241 860825 PDR ADOCK 05000508 A PDR
s audit, some of the flawed design packages have not been corrected. For the EAP review, the applicant will characterize the status of the piping and support work, what problems were found (frce both the prior audit and the present review), what improvements were implemented, and what remains to be done after the project is restarted.
/s/
George F. Dick, Jr., Project Manager PWR Project Directorate No. 7 Division of PWR Licensing-B
Enclosures:
As stated cc: See next page DIR:PD7 ck/yt GWKnighton 8//f/86 I 8Qi786
= ,
V Mr. D. W. Mazur WPPSS Nuclear Project No. 3 Washington Public Power Supply System (KNP-3) cc:
Mr. Charles B. Brinkman, Manager Mr. G. C. Sorensen, Manager hashington Nuclear Operations Regulatory Programs Combustion Engineering, Inc. Washington Public Power Supply 7910 Woodmont Avenue Sutie 1310 System Bethesda, Maryland 20814 Post Office Box 968 3000 George Washington Way Nicholas S. Reynolds, Esq. Richland, Washington 99352 DeBevoise & Liberman 1200 Seventeenth Street Washington, DC 20036 G. E. Doupe, Esq.
Washington Public Power Supply System 30C0 George Washington Way Richland, Washington 99352 Kr. Curtis Eschels, Chairman Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council Mail Stop PY-11 Glympia, Washington 98505 Mr. Douglas Coleman Washington Public Power Supply System P. O. Box 1223 Elma, Washington 98541 Mr. William Ang Region Inspector /WPPSS 3/5 U.S. huclear Reagulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Regional Administrator, Region V U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1450 Maria Lane Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Mr. Eugene Rosclie, Director Coalition for Safe Power 408 Southwest Second Avenue Portland, Oregon 97204 l
l 1
/ Enclosure 1 Attendance KNP-3 Readiness Review Peeting August 1, 1986 RV-NRC D. F. Kirsch, Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects A. E. Chaffee, Deputy Director, Division of Reactor Safety and Projects R. J. Pate, Chief, Reactor Safety Branch M. M. Mendonca, Chief, Reactor Project Section I W. P. Ang, Project Inspector, WNP-3 NRR-NRC G. Dick, Licensing Project Manager IE-NRC G. T. Ankrum, Chief, Quality Assurance Branch W. M. Hill, Acting Section Chief, Quality Assurance Branch WPPSS L. J. Garvin, Program Manager, Readiness Review R. L. Knawa, Manager, Construction Assurance Program G. Block, Manager, Engineering Assurance Program T. McCormick, Team Leader, Construction Assurance Program
Enclosure 2 2
A3ENDA SUPPLY SYSTEM READINESS REVIEW PROGRAM EETING WITH l NRC REGION V August 1, 1986
- 1. EARTHWORK MODULE Introduction Definition and Extent of Module Report Format Amount of Detail Exanples Letter of Transmittal
- 2. PIPING / PIPE SUPPORTS MODULE Status Outstanding Items Examples Details l
l 1
Enclosure 3 7/29/86 FINAL MODULE REPORT FOR EARTH)l0RK i
MODULE C3-01
1.0 INTRODUCTION
Describe the overall purpose and scope of the (discipline / commodity) review; how, when, and by whom it was initiated and implemented; and how it is reported.
1.1 Purpose and Scope
1.2 Implementation 1.3 Arrangement of the Report 2.0 EXECUTIVE SIMiARY An abstract of the report and its results, thi s section briefly summarizes the salient points of the review program that deal with the di scipline/ con' modi ty . ...
3.0 EAP SIMiARY REPORT ON EARTHWORK 4.0 REVIEW PROGRAM DESCRIPTION The basic program to accomplish the module review and inspection is described in this section. This description includes module review plans and checklists, and the procedures and instructions used by the participants. It identifies the contracts covered by the reviews and compares the reviews accomplished with the requirements established by the design drawings and specifications, the FSAR, and the QA program.
t 4.1 Scope 4.2 Contract Applicability l 4.3 Program Content l
4.4 Evaluation of Related Programs l
4.5 Procedures and Instructions 4.6 Review Plans and Checklists 5.0 PROGRAM MANAGEE3T This section describes the organization and management activities that control the C AP, and the methods by which coordination and control are achi eved .
l l
Paga Two
. 7/29/86 5.1 Organization 5.2 Internal Controls 5.3 Management Involvement 5.4 NRC Involvement 5.5 Reporting 5.6 Oversight Committee 6.0 METHODOLOGY This section addresses the rationale applied to sampling , and the techniques used to select hardware items for inspection. It covers the philosophy applied to reviews and inspections in this program and the methods used to pcriorm them. It also addresses the rationale used to evaluate results so that conclusions may be drawn and appropri ate corrective action-initiated.
6.1 Sampling Rationale 6.2 Review and Inspection Philosophy 6.3 Checklist Developnent 6.3.1 Selection of Attributes 6.3.2 Checklist Preparation 7.0 PROGRAM RESULTS 7.1 General 7.2 Placement Areas 7.3 Checklist Findings 7.3.1 Soil Cement - In-Place Density / Moisture Test 7.3.2 Cement - Compressive Strength 7.3.3 Soil Cement - Cement Content 7.3.4 Soil / Soil Cement Personnel Qualifications - Testing 7.3.5 Soll Cement / Soils - Equipment Calibration 7.3.6 Scil Cement Density Test Frequercy 7.3.7 Soil Cement / Soils - Curing & Lift Thickness 7.3.8 Soil Cement Water Quality 7.3.9 Soil / Soil Cement Personnel Qualifications - Batch Plant
. ,[ Page Threa 7/29/86 7.3.10 Soil Coment/Baten Plant Equipment Calibration 7.3.11 Soil Cement / Soils - Personnel Qualifications, Placing Inspection 7.3.12 QA Audits 7.3.13 Site Surveillance (Sample Procedure)J 7.3.14 Proctor Tests / Sieve Analysis - Class A-1 Fill 7.3.15 Class A-1 Fill - In-Pla e Density Tests 7.3.16 Site QC Surveillance 7.3.17 Class A-1 Fill Density Test Frequency 7.3.18 NCR Fill, Proctor Tests and Sieve Analysis 7.3.19 NCR Fill, In-Place Density Tests 7.3.20 NCR Fill, Density Test Frequency 7.3.21 Ebasco Quality Control Inspection Qualification 7.4 Evaluation of Contractor Perferr.ance (Tentative) 7.4.1 Contract 3240-204, I1spection and Testing Services, Pittsburg Testing Laboratory (PTL) 7.4.2 Contract 3240-209, Supply and Delivery of Concrete, Associated Sand & Gravel Company (AS&G).
7.4.3 Contract 3240-263, Reactor Auxiliary Building (RAB)
General Constructi on, Morri son-Knudsen Conpany, Inc.
(M-K).
7.4.4 Contract 3240-251/226, installation of Piping Systems and Equipment, Peter Kiewi Sons' Co. (PKS).
7.5 FSAR Commitments 7.6 Other CAP Technical Assessments 7.6.1 Excavation Permit Review 7.6.2 Sand Sieve Analysis Review 7.6.3 NRC Item of Noncompliance (PTL Records Falsification).
7.6.4 NRC Circular No. IEC 81-08
~
. . ,, Page Four 7/29/86
's 7.4.5 ' Construction Management Activities 7.4.6 Drainage System Walkdown t
7.4.7 Identification of Incomplete Work 7.4.8 Review of NCR's
8.0 CONCLUSION
S AND RECOMElWATIONS In thi s section, summery results are accumulated and conclusions are presented. Speci al attention is to be given to identifying how the project's FSAR commi tments were met for the di scipline/commodi ty construction addressed in the module. Recommendations for future action are made by the review team to Supply System management and to the project.
9.0 OVERSIGHT CON 4ITTEE ASSESSENT APPENDICES Appendix 1, CAP Review Plan for Earthwork, Module C3-0, Rev.1.
l )
- ;b.y P. %*?
5 FEETING SUFFARY DISTRIEUTION j cketNc(s): 50-508 NRC PDR Local PDR PBD-7 Reading JPartlow BGrimes ACRS(10)
EJordan Attorney, OELD GWKnighton Project Manager GDick NFC PARTICIPANTS 1
DFKirsch 4
AEChaffee RJPate MMMendonca WPAng GDick GTAnkrum WMHill 1
bec: Applicant & Service List 4
._, - _ - . - . . . . . . - . _ .- . , - - . - . - . - . . - _ - .