|
---|
Category:SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT--LICENSING & RELATED ISSUES
MONTHYEARML20209G0011999-07-0909 July 1999 Staff Evaluation of Individual Plant Exam of External Events Submittal on Plant,Unit 1 ML20207B6621999-05-27027 May 1999 SER Finding That Licensee Established Acceptable Program to Periodically Verify design-basis Capability of safety-related MOVs at TMI-1 & That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Required in GL 96-05 ML20206D4201999-04-20020 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Exemption from Technical Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2.c for Fire Areas/Zones AB-FZ-4,CB-FA-1,FH-FZ-1,FH-FZ-6,FH-FZ-6, IPSH-FZ-1,IPSH-FZ-2,AB-FZ-3,AB-FZ-5,AB-FZ-7 & FH-FZ-2 ML20196K3561999-01-22022 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Although Original Licensee Thermal Model Was Unacceptable for Ampacity Derating Assessments Revised Model Identified in 970624 Submittal Acceptable for Installed Electrical Raceway Ampacity Limits ML20196F6861998-12-0202 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Second 10-yr Interval ISI Program Plan Request for Alternative to ASME B&PV Code Section XI Requirements Re Actions to Be Taken Upon Detecting Leakage at Bolted Connection ML20195C6921998-11-12012 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 52 to License DPR-73 ML20153A9941998-09-16016 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Denying Request to Remove Missile Shields from Plant Design ML20151U8821998-09-0808 September 1998 SER on Revised Emergency Action Levels for Gpu Nuclear,Inc, Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 ML20237A8331998-08-12012 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting USI A-46 Program Implementation at Plant,Unit 1 ML20199G8371998-01-22022 January 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20210Q9991997-08-28028 August 1997 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Since 25th Tendon Surveillance on Few Yrs Away,Adequacy of Remaining Prestressing Force Will Be Critical to Verify ML20149F9961997-07-18018 July 1997 Safety Evaluation Re Gpu Nuclear Operational Quality Assurance Plan,Rev 10 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1 & Oyster Creek Nuclear Generating Station ML20138H6671996-12-19019 December 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Util IPE Submittal in Response to GL 88-20 ML20134D7811996-10-24024 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 51 to License DPR-73 ML20128L6741996-10-11011 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Accepting Third ten-year Interval for Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program for Facility ML20128K1981996-10-0808 October 1996 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 50 to License DPR-73 ML20059D1771993-12-28028 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 48 to License DPR-73 ML20062K1041993-12-0606 December 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 47 to License DPR-73 ML20058F0311993-11-16016 November 1993 SE Informing That Changes to Pdms Requirements & Commitments List of 930115,does Not Constitute Unreviewed Safety Question,Nor Do They Involve Significant Hazard or an Environmental Impact ML20059K3001993-11-0808 November 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 46 to License DPR-73 ML20057A3641993-09-0101 September 1993 SER Denying Licensee 930216 & 0416 Requests for Relief from Certain Requirements of ISI Program ML20056F0171993-08-0505 August 1993 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Pdms Requirements & Commitments List of 930115 ML20128P7321993-02-19019 February 1993 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 171 to License DPR-50 ML20126M2861993-01-0505 January 1993 Safety Evaluation Granting Relief from ISI Post Repair Hydrostatic Schedule Requirements ML20058G1331990-11-0606 November 1990 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 39 to License DPR-73 ML20058P4681990-08-0909 August 1990 Safety Evaluation Accepting Changes to Table 4.3-3 of Recovery Operations Plan ML20247L0681989-09-11011 September 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 35 to License DPR-73 ML20245J4411989-06-23023 June 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 850823 Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 4.5.3, Reactor Trip Reliability - On-Line Functional Testing of Reactor Trip Sys ML20247E8141989-05-18018 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Accepting Proposed Changes to Recovery Operations Plan ML20247G4131989-05-15015 May 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 34 to License DPR-73 ML20245J1201989-04-27027 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 149 to License DPR-50 ML20245A6521989-04-12012 April 1989 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 33 to License DPR-73 ML20196B3071988-12-0101 December 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Approval of Lower Core Support Assembly & Lower Head Defueling ML20153E6861988-08-31031 August 1988 Safety Evaluation Accepting Request for Exemption from Lecture Requirements of 10CFR55.59(c)(2) & for Exceptions to Control Manipulations Required by 10CFR55.59(c)(3)(i), Subsections (a) to (AA) ML20153E8471988-08-30030 August 1988 Safety Evaluation Approving Request for Mod of Recovery Operations Plan Table 4.3.3 ML20195B6991988-05-27027 May 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 30 to License DPR-73 ML20155B3151988-05-25025 May 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 30 to License DPR-73 ML20151D5611988-03-31031 March 1988 Sser of Util 870917 & 1103 Justifications for Proposals & & Relief Requests Re Pump & Valve Inservice Testing Program Denied in 870319 Ser.Exclusion of Stated Valves Accepted ML20150D5101988-03-18018 March 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 871027 Submittal Re Reconfiguring Main Steam Line Rupture Detection Sys Bypass Indicating Lamp During Cycle 8 Refueling Outage ML20147D9721988-02-26026 February 1988 Supplemental Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Use of Rochester Instrument Sys Model SC-1302 Isolation Devices,Per NUREG-0737,Suppl 1 ML20147E2491988-01-0808 January 1988 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 871203 & 28 Requests to Use Core Bore Machine to Dismantle Lower Core Suport Assembly ML20237B1501987-12-10010 December 1987 SER Supporting Util Response to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.1 (Part 2), Vendor Interface Programs (Reactor Trip Sys Components) ML20236T5611987-11-18018 November 1987 SER Accepting Util 831108,850805 & 870529 Responses to Generic Ltr 83-28,Item 2.2.1, Equipment Classification Programs for All Safety-Related Components ML20236M9221987-11-0505 November 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util Proposal Re Elimination of Postulated Primary Loop Pipe Ruptures from Design Basis ML20235S3241987-10-0101 October 1987 Safety Evaluation Approving Util 870724 Request for Staging of Two Radwaste Solidification Liners in Waste Handling & Packaging facility.TMI-2 Svc List Encl ML20237G5301987-08-12012 August 1987 Safety Evaluation of Util Response to Item 2.1 (Part 1) of Generic Ltr 83-28, Equipment Classification (Reactor Trip Sys Components) TMI-1. Util Response Acceptable ML20234B9701987-06-25025 June 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 28 to License DPR-73 ML20212Q7341987-04-17017 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 27 to License DPR-73 ML20206B4131987-04-0303 April 1987 Safety Evaluation Supporting Util 850416 Request for Deletion of Constraint of 20-ft Square Modified Penetrations Between Reactor & Auxiliary/Fuel Handling Bldgs.Expanding of Limit to 40-ft Square Acceptable ML20205C6161987-03-20020 March 1987 Safety Evaluation Re Util 860820 & 1020 Requests for Relief from ASME Code Section XI Requirements for Class 1,2 & 3 Components.Relief Should Be Granted Except for Requests 4 & 7.Insufficient Info Provided for Request 7 1999-07-09
[Table view] Category:TEXT-SAFETY REPORT
MONTHYEARML20217K4701999-09-30030 September 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1999 for TMI-1.With ML20211H5111999-08-31031 August 1999 Non-proprietary Rev 1 to MPR-1820(NP), TMI Nuclear Generating Station OTSG Kinetic Expansion Insp Criteria Analysis ML20211Q3551999-08-31031 August 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1999 for Tmi,Unit 1.With ML20210R4791999-08-13013 August 1999 Update 3 to Post-Defueling Monitored Storage SAR, for TMI-2 ML20210U4791999-07-31031 July 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1999 for TMI-1.With ML20209G0011999-07-0909 July 1999 Staff Evaluation of Individual Plant Exam of External Events Submittal on Plant,Unit 1 ML20210K7651999-07-0909 July 1999 Rev 2 to 86-5002073-02, Summary Rept for Bwog 20% Tp Loca ML20209H8251999-07-0101 July 1999 Provides Commission with Evaluation of & Recommendations for Improvement in Processes Used in Staff Review & Approval of Applications for Transfer of Operating Licenses of TMI-1 & Pilgrim Station ML20209H1421999-06-30030 June 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1999 for TMI-1.With ML20195H0751999-06-0808 June 1999 Drill 9904, 1999 Biennial Exercise for Three Mile Island ML20195H9261999-05-31031 May 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1999 for TMI-1.With ML20209G0351999-05-31031 May 1999 TER on Review of TMI-1 IPEEE Submittal on High Winds,Floods & Other External Events (Hfo) ML20207B6621999-05-27027 May 1999 SER Finding That Licensee Established Acceptable Program to Periodically Verify design-basis Capability of safety-related MOVs at TMI-1 & That Util Adequately Addressed Actions Required in GL 96-05 ML20206R0571999-04-30030 April 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1999 for Tmi,Unit 1.With ML20206D4201999-04-20020 April 1999 Safety Evaluation Granting Exemption from Technical Requirements of 10CFR50,App R,Section III.G.2.c for Fire Areas/Zones AB-FZ-4,CB-FA-1,FH-FZ-1,FH-FZ-6,FH-FZ-6, IPSH-FZ-1,IPSH-FZ-2,AB-FZ-3,AB-FZ-5,AB-FZ-7 & FH-FZ-2 ML20209G0071999-03-31031 March 1999 Submittal-Only Screening Review of Three Mile Island,Unit 1 Individual Plant Exam for External Events (Seismic Portion) ML20205K6851999-03-31031 March 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1999 for Tmi,Unit 1.With ML20210C0161999-03-0101 March 1999 Forwards Corrected Pp 3 of SECY-98-252.Correction Makes Changes to Footnote 3 as Directed by SRM on SECY-98-246 ML20207M8461999-02-28028 February 1999 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1999 for TMI-1.With ML20196K3561999-01-22022 January 1999 Safety Evaluation Concluding That Although Original Licensee Thermal Model Was Unacceptable for Ampacity Derating Assessments Revised Model Identified in 970624 Submittal Acceptable for Installed Electrical Raceway Ampacity Limits ML20207A9291998-12-31031 December 1998 1998 Annual Rept for TMI-1 & TMI-2 ML20196G4661998-12-31031 December 1998 British Energy Annual Rept & Accounts 1997/98. Prospectus of British Energy Share Offer Encl ML20196F6861998-12-0202 December 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting Licensee Second 10-yr Interval ISI Program Plan Request for Alternative to ASME B&PV Code Section XI Requirements Re Actions to Be Taken Upon Detecting Leakage at Bolted Connection ML20198B8641998-11-30030 November 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1998 for TMI-1.With ML20195C6921998-11-12012 November 1998 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 52 to License DPR-73 ML20195J8591998-11-12012 November 1998 Rev 11 to 1000-PLN-7200.01, Gpu Nuclear Operational QA Plan ML20196B7191998-10-31031 October 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Oct 1998 for TMI-1.With ML20203G1211998-10-30030 October 1998 Informs Commission About Staff Preliminary Views Concerning Whether Proposed Purchase of TMI-1,by Amergen,Inc,Would Cause Commission to Know or Have Reason to Believe That License for TMI-1 Would Be Controlled by Foreign Govt ML20155E7511998-10-15015 October 1998 Rev 1 to Form NIS-1 Owners Data Rept for Isi,Rept on 1997 Outage 12R EC Exams of TMI-1 OTSG Tubing ML20154L5541998-09-30030 September 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Sept 1998 for TMI Unit 1.With ML20153A9941998-09-16016 September 1998 Safety Evaluation Denying Request to Remove Missile Shields from Plant Design ML20151U8821998-09-0808 September 1998 SER on Revised Emergency Action Levels for Gpu Nuclear,Inc, Three Mile Island Nuclear Plant Units 1 & 2 ML20151V2811998-08-31031 August 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Aug 1998 for Tmi,Unit 1.With ML20237A8331998-08-12012 August 1998 Safety Evaluation Accepting USI A-46 Program Implementation at Plant,Unit 1 ML20237C6411998-07-31031 July 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for July 1998 for Tmi,Unit 1 ML20236R2201998-06-30030 June 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for June 1998 for TMI-1 ML20236W9961998-06-0909 June 1998 1998 Quadrennial Simulator Certification Rept ML20248F7441998-05-31031 May 1998 Reactor Vessel Working Group,Response to RAI Regarding Reactor Pressure Vessel Integrity ML20249A1061998-05-31031 May 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for May 1998 for TMI-1 ML20247G0761998-04-30030 April 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Apr 1998 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20212A2191998-04-22022 April 1998 Rev 3 to Gpu Nuclear Post-Defueling Monitored Storage QAP for Three Mile Island Unit 2 ML20248H6991998-04-0808 April 1998 Requests,By Negative Consent,Commission Approval of Intent to Inform Doe,Idaho Operations Ofc of Finding That Adequate Safety Basis Support Granting Exemption to 10CFR72 Seismic Design Requirement for ISFSI to Store TMI-2 Fuel Debris ML20216K1061998-03-31031 March 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Mar 1998 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20217E0811998-03-24024 March 1998 Rev 0 to TR-121, TMI-1 Control Room Habitability for Max Hypothetical Accident ML20212E2291998-03-0404 March 1998 Rev 11 to 1000-PLN-7200,01, Gpu Nuclear Operational QAP, Consisting of Revised Pages & Pages for Which Pagination Affected ML20216F0981998-02-28028 February 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Feb 1998 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20202F8121998-01-31031 January 1998 Monthly Operating Rept for Jan 1998 for TMI Nuclear Station, Unit 1 ML20199G8371998-01-22022 January 1998 SER Accepting Licensee Response to GL 95-07, Pressure Locking & Thermal Binding of Safety-Related Power-Operated Gate Valves, for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,Unit 1 ML20198N2901998-01-12012 January 1998 Form NIS-1 Owners' Data Rept for Isi ML20199J3251997-12-31031 December 1997 Monthly Operating Rept for Dec 1997 for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station,Unit 1 1999-09-30
[Table view] |
Text
._
r .
I i
l j ENCLOSURE 1 i
SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT FOR l GENERIC LETTER 83-28, ITEM 1.2 - POST-TRIP REVIEW (DATA AND INFORMATION CAPABILITY) l THREE MILE ISLAND NUCLEAR STATION, UNIT 1 j DOCKET NO. 50-289 i
J On February 25, 1983, both of the scram circuit breakers at Unit 1 of the
! Salem Nuclear Power Plant (SNPP) failed to open upon an automatic reactor trip signal from the reactor protection system. This incident occurred during the plant start-up and the reactor was tripped manually by the operator about 4 30 seconds after the initiation of the automatic trip signal. The failure of a i
- the circuit breakers has been determined to be related to the sticking of the I
j undervoltage trip attachment. On February 22, 1983, during start-up of SNPP, I Unit 1, an automatic trip signal occurred as the result of steam generator low-low level. In this case, the reactor was tripped manually by the operator-almost coincidentally with the automatic trip. Following these incidents, on February 28, 1983, the NRC Executive Director for Operations (ED0) directed the staff to investigate and report on the generic implications of these occurrences. The results of the staff's inquiry into these incidents are re-ported in NUREG-1000, " Generic Implications of ATWS Events at the Salem Nuclear Power Plant." As a result of this investigation, the Commission requested (by i Generic Letter 83-28 dated July 8,1983) all licensees of operating reactors, applicants for an operating license, and holders of construction permits to l respond to certain generic concerns. These concerns are categorized into four areas: (1) Post-Trip Review. (2) Equipment Classification and Vendor Interface, (3) Post-Maintenance Testing, and (4) Reactor Trip System Reliability Improve-ments. !
@60624054s e60612 PDR ADOCK 050002e9 '
p PDR
. l The first action item, Post-Trip Review, consists of Action Item 1.1, " Program Description and Procedure" and Action Item 1.2, " Data and Information Capabili ty. " This safety evaluation report (SER) addresses Action Item 1.2 only.
II. REVIEW GUIDELINES The following review guidelines were developed after initial evaluation of the various utility responses to Item 1.2 of Generic Letter 83-28 and ir. corporate the best features of these submittals. As such, these review guidelines in effect represent a " good practices" approach to post-trip review. We have re-viewed the licensee's response to Item 1.2 against these guidelines:
A. The equipment that provides the digital sequence of events (SOE) record and the analog time history records of an unscheduled shutdown should provide a reliable source of the necessary information to be used in the post-trip review. Each plant variable which is necessary to determine the cause and progression of the events following a plant trip should be monitored by at least one recorder (such as a sequence-of-events recorder or a plant process computer) for digital parameters; and strip charts, a plant process computer or analog recorder for analog (time history) variables. Performance characteristics guidelines for SOE and time history recorders are as follows:
. o Each sequence of events recorder should be capable of detecting I and recording the sequence of events with a sufficient time discrimination capability to ensure that the time responses
^
associated with each monitored safety-related system can be I ascertained, and that a determination can be made as to whether the time response is within acceptable limits based on FSAR Chapter 15 Accident Analyses. The recommended guidelines for the SOE time discrimination is approximately 100 milliseconds. If current SOE recorders do not have this time discrimination
- capability the licensee should show that the current time discrimination capability is sufficient for an adequate reconstruction of the course of the reactor trip and post-trip f events. As a minimum this should include the ability to
! adequately reconstruct the transient and accident scenarios
, presented in Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR.
l o Each, analog time history data recorder should have a sample interval small enough so that the incident can be accurately reconstructed following a reactor trip. As a minimum, the j licensee should be able to reconstruct the course of the transient and accident sequences evaluated in the accident I
! l 4
i r _ - . . - . . - . _ . .- _ ,..-_ .- -_.._ , .,- . . _ . . _ . . . - _
analysis of Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR. The recommended guideline for the sample interval is 10 seconds. If the time history equipment does not meet this guideline, the licensee should show that the time history capability is sufficient to accurately reconstruct the transient and accident sequences presented in Chapter 15 of the FSAR. To support the post-trip analysis of the cause of the trip and the proper functioning of involved safety related equipment, each analog time history data recorder should be capable of updating and retaining information i from approximately five minutes prior to the trip until at least ten minutes after the trip.
o All equipment used to record sequence o' events and time history information should be powered from a reliable and non-interruptible power source. The power source used need not be Class 1E.
B. The sequence of events and time history recording equipment should monitor sufficient digital and analog parameters, respectively, to assure that the course of the reactor trip and post-trip events can be reconstructed. The parameters monitored should provide sufficient information to determine the root cause of the unscheduled shutdown, the progression of the reactor trip, and the response of the plant parameters and protection and safety systems to the unscheduled shutdowns. Specifically, all input parameters
/
i
associated with reactor trips, safety injections and other safety-related systems as well as output parameters sufficient to record the proper functioning of these systems should be recorded for use in the post-trip review. The parameters deemed necessary, as a minimum, to perform a post-trip review that would determine if the plant remained within its safety limit design envelope are presented in Table 1. They were selected on the basis of staff engineering judgment following a complete evaluation of utility submittals. If the licensee's SOE recorders and time history recorders do not monitor all of the parameters suggested in these tables the licensce should show that the existing set of monitored parameters are sufficient to establish that the plant remained within the design envelope for the accident conditions analyzed in Chapter 15 of the plant FSAR.
C. The information gathered by the sequence of events and time history recorders should be stored in a manner that will allow for data retrieval and analysis. The data may be retained in either hardcopy, (e.g., com-puter printout, strip chart record), or in an accessible memory (e.g.,
magnetic disc or tape). This information should be presented in a read-able and meaningful format, taking into consideration good human factors practices such as those outlined in NUREG-0700.
D. Retention of data from all unscheduled shutdowns provides a valuable reference source for the determination of the acceptability of the plant vital parameter and equipment response to subsequent unscheduled shutdowns. Information gathered during the post-trip review is to be retained for the life of the plant for post-trip raview comparisons of !
subsequent events.
I III. EVALUATION AND CONCLUSION By letters dated November 8,1983 and February 1,1984, General Public Utilities provided information regarding its post-trip review program data and informa-tion capabilities for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1. We have evaluated the licensee's submittals against the review guidelines described in Section II. Deviations from the Guidelines of Section II were discussed with representatives of the licensee by telephone on October 23, 1985. A brief description of the licensee's responses and the staff's evaluation of the response against each of the review guidelines follows:
A. The licensee has described the performance characteristics of the equipment used to record the sequence of events and time history data needed for post-trip review. Based on our review of the licensee's submittals and the information provided by the licensee by telephone on October 23, 1985, we find that the sequence of events recorder and time history characteristics conform to the guidelines described in l Section II A, and are acceptable. l 1
l l
B. The licensee has established and identified the parameters to be monitored and recorded for post-trip review. Based on our review of the licensee's submittals and on information obtained during our telephone i review, we find that the parameters selected by the licensee include all but one of these identified in Table 1. The licensee stated that while Steam Flow is not recorded on a time history recorder, there are j indicators in the control room which, when combined with special pro-cedures, provide the desired information. The staff finds this alternative acceptable.
The licensee does not record all of the sequence of events and tire history parameters in the specific manner recommended in Table 1. How-ever, based upon information provided by the licensee during our tele-phone review, we find that the licensee has alternative data sources for those parameters not recorded on the sequence of events recorders and time history recorders. These include: (1) a Transient Monitoring Sys-tem, (2) a,n alarm printer in the control room, (3) the SP3S with hardcopy capability, and (4) strip chart recorders with non-interruptible power supplies. Consequently, we find that the licensee's selection of para-meters meets the intent of the guidelines described in Section II.B and is, therefore, acceptable.
i
C. During the Octoter 23, 1986, telecon, the licensee described the means for storage and retrieval of the information gathered by the sequence of events
, and time history recorders, and for the presentation of this information for post-trip review and analysis. We find that this information is being presented in a _ readable and meaningful format, and that the storage, retrieval and presentation conform to the guidelines of Section II C.
D. During the October 23, 1986, telecon, the licensee stated that the data and 2
information used during post-trip reviews are being retained in an accessi-ble manner for the life of the plant. Based on this information, we find t!.at the licensee's program for data retention conforms to the guidelines of Section II D, and is acceptable.
Based on our review of the licensee's submittals and our telephone conversa-tions with the licensee, we conclude that the licensee's post-trip review data and information capabilities for Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1, are acceptable.
, I 1
I l
. l TABLE 1 PWR PARAMETER LIST SOE Tine History Recorder Recorder Parameter / Signal (1) x Reactor Trip (1) x Safety Injection x ,
. Containment Isolation (1),x ,
Turbine Trip x Control Rod Position (1) x x Neutren Flux, Power x x Containment Pressure (2) Containnent Radiation x Containnent Sump Level (1) x x Primary System Pressure (1) x x .' Primary System Temperature .
(1) x Pressurizer Level (1) x Reactor Coolant Pump Status
. (1)x x Primary System Flow (3) -
Safety Inj.; Flow. Pump / Valve Status
.x MSIV Position x x Steam Generator Pressure (1) x x Steam Generator Level (1) x x Feedwater Flow (1) x x Steam Flow ,
~
SOE Time History Recorder . Recorder Pa rameter/Sienal -
(3) Auxiliary Feedwater System: Flow, .
Pump / Valve Status x
AC and DC System Status (Bus Voltage) x Diesel Generator Status (Start /Stop,
. On/Off) s . x PORV Position (1) Trip parameters m*.
I (2) Parameter may be monitored by either an SOE or time history recorder.
(3) Acceptable recorder options are; (a) system flow recorded on an SOE recorder (b) systen flow recorded on a time history recorder, or (c) equipment status recorded on an SOE recorder.
Dated: June 12, 1986 l
, - - , . - - - - - . - . . . .