|
---|
Category:INTERVENTION PETITIONS
MONTHYEARML20209H9101999-07-20020 July 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Hearing.* with Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20199F7641999-01-21021 January 1999 Answer of Montaup Electric Co to Motion of Ui for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Requests Motion Be Denied on Basis of Late Filing.With Certificate of Svc ML20206Q0151999-01-12012 January 1999 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Answer to Petition to Intervene of New England Power Co.* If Commission Deems It Appropriate to Explore Issues Further in Subpart M Hearing Context,Naesco Will Participate.With Certificate of Svc ML20199A4331999-01-11011 January 1999 Motion of United Illuminating Co for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Company Requests That Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time Be Granted.With Certificate of Svc ML20198P7181998-12-31031 December 1998 Motion of Nepco for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* Moves to Intervene in Transfer of Montaup Seabrook Ownership Interest & Petitions for Summary Relief or for Hearing ML20237C6981998-08-18018 August 1998 Sapl/Necnp Reply to Naesco Response to Proposed Contentions.* Board Should Admit Sapl/Necnp Contentions 1-4 & North Atlantic Energy Svcs Corp Arguments to Contrary. W/Certificate of Svc ML20237C6791998-08-18018 August 1998 Sapl/New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Reply to Staff Answer to Contentions.* Petitioners Believe Board Can & Should Give Cases Consideration W/O Filing of Addl,But Not Substantively Different Contention.W/Certificate of Svc ML20237A0501998-08-10010 August 1998 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Response to Proposed Contentions.* Petitioners Failed to Propose Admissible Contention.Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene,As Applied to Both Petitioners Should Be Denied ML20236X9281998-08-10010 August 1998 NRC Staff Answer to Contentions.* for Reasons Stated,All of Contentions Proposed Should Be Rejected & Proceeding Should Be Terminated.W/Certificate of Svc ML20066H2581991-02-14014 February 1991 Response of Ma Atty General & Necnp to ASLB Order of 910124.* Intervenors Believe ASLB Should Reopen Record, Permit Discovery & Hold Hearing on Beach Sheltering Issues. W/Certificate of Svc ML19332D7241989-11-21021 November 1989 Intervenors Motion for Clarification Or,In Alternative,For Reconsideration.* Clarification or Reconsideration of Scheduling Requirements Set by Commission 891121 Order Requested.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19332D5191989-11-15015 November 1989 Applicant Answer to Intervenors Motion to Admit late-filed Contention & Reopen Record Based Upon Withdrawal of Commonwealth of Ma Emergency Broadcast Sys Network & Wcgy.* Motion Should Be Denied Since Results Unlikely to Change ML19325E0171989-10-20020 October 1989 Applicant Answer to Intervenors Second Motion to Admit Contentions on 890927 Emergency Plan Exercise.* Motion to Assert Addl Bases for Original Onsite Exercise Contention JI-Onsite Ex-1 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML19325E0011989-10-20020 October 1989 Applicant Response to Intervenors Motion to Amend Intervenors Motions of 890929 & 1013 to Admit Contentions on 890927 Onsite Emergency Plan Exercise.* Issue Re Admittance Committed to Board Discretion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248J3511989-10-13013 October 1989 Intervenors Second Motion to Admit Contentions on 890927 Emergency Plan Exercise.* Advises That Applicant Contentions Filed on 890929 to Admit Addl Bases Re Scope of Onsite Exercsise Should Be Admitted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248J0601989-09-28028 September 1989 Intervenors Motion to Admit Contentions on 890927 Emergency Plan Exercise.* Requests Hearing & to Engage in Discovery for Hearing on Contention.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20247Q6761989-09-22022 September 1989 Intervenors Second Informational Suppl to Low Power Contentions Filed on 890721 & 0828.* Incorporates Encl Plant Startup Test Procedure 1-ST-22,Rev 2 Into Low Power Testing Contentions.W/Supporting Info & Certificate of Svc ML20246N1001989-09-0101 September 1989 Intervenors Reply to Responses of Applicant & Staff Re Intervenors Motion to Admit Contention,Or,In Alternative,To Reopen Record & Request for Hearing.* Contention Raises New Issues & Should Be Admitted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E0321989-07-21021 July 1989 Intervenors Motion to Admit Contention,Or in Alternative,To Reopen Record & Request for Hearing.* Requests Contentions Re Deficiencies in Training,Mgt Control,Supervision, Communication & Procedure Compliance Be Admitted ML20246P2041989-07-0505 July 1989 Joint Intervenor (Ji) Contentions on Spmc & June 1988 Graded Exercise.* ML20248F4691989-04-0303 April 1989 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League (Sapl) Trial Brief on Contention Ji 56 & Sapl Contentions EX-2,4,6,7,8,12,13 & 14.* Svc List Encl ML20206M9761988-11-23023 November 1988 NRC Staff Response to 881114 Board Order Requesting Comments on Significance of ALAB-903 for Seabrook Proposed General Exercise Contentions.* Contentions & Bases Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206M9431988-11-22022 November 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Comments on Significance of ALAB-903 to Seabrook Offsite Exercise Contentions.* Svc List Encl ML20206M9031988-11-22022 November 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Comments on Significance of ALAB-903 to Exercise Contentions.* Svc List Encl ML20205R7201988-11-0202 November 1988 Town of Hampton Contention on Applicant Plan to Fund Decommissioning Costs of Seabrook Station.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205R5661988-11-0202 November 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Contentions on Applicant Plan in Response to NRC Order CLI-88-07.* Supporting Documentation Encl ML20205R5441988-11-0202 November 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Jm Shannon late-filed Contentions Concerning Joint Applicant Financial Qualifications to Operate Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205R4971988-11-0202 November 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Contentions on Applicant Decommissioning Plan,Motion for Stay of Low Power Operation & Motion to Reopen Record.* Supporting Info & Svc List Encl ML20205R4821988-11-0202 November 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Jm Shannon late-filed Contentions Concerning Joint Applicant Decommissioning Plan for Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.* ML20205E0011988-10-24024 October 1988 Reply of Commonwealth of Ma Atty General to Responses of NRC Staff & Applicant to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Exercise Contentions.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205E0271988-10-21021 October 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution (Necnp) & Town of Hampton (Toh) Reply to Applicant & NRC Staff Responses to Contentions Toh/Necnp EX-2 & Toh/Necnp EX-3.* Svc List Encl ML20205D8051988-10-21021 October 1988 Town of Hampton & New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Reply to Responses of Staff & Applicant to Intervenor Contentions on Graded Exercise.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C1951988-10-18018 October 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League (Sapl) Reply to Applicant & Staff Responses to Sapl Contentions on June 1988 Graded Exercise.* Svc List Encl ML20204G9731988-10-13013 October 1988 NRC Staff Response to Intervenors Contentions on Graded Exercise.* Proposed General Exercise Contentions Should Be Admitted for Litigation & Proferred Contentions Should Be Denied Admission.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154S4571988-09-28028 September 1988 Applicant Response to Intervenor Contentions on June 1988 Seabrook Exercise.* Intervenor Contentions Should Be Disposed Of.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154P3461988-09-21021 September 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution & Town of Hampton Contentions Re 1988 Exercise of Offsite Plans & Preparedness for Plant Emergency Planning Zone.* Svc List Encl ML20154K8741988-09-21021 September 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Exercise Contentions Submitted in Response to June 1988 Plant Initial full- Participation Exercise.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154K9331988-09-21021 September 1988 Town of Hampton & New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Emergency Planning Contentions on 880628-29 Exercise.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154N9061988-09-20020 September 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Contentions on Graded Exercise.* Svc List Encl ML20154D7431988-09-12012 September 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Petition for Review of ALAB-899.* Petition Should Be Granted on Basis That Integrity of RCS Significantly Paramount to Safe Operation of Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20151A6461988-07-0707 July 1988 NRC Staff Response to Town of Salisbury Amended Contentions Re Applicant Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Applicant Untimely Amends to Contentions Should Be Rejected. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151A6301988-07-0606 July 1988 NRC Staff Response to City of Haverhill Detailed Contentions.* City of Haverhill late-filed Contentions Should Be Rejected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196G7031988-06-27027 June 1988 Applicant Response to City of Haverhill Detailed Contentions.* Contentions Should Be Rejected & City Should Be Denied Admission as Party,Per 10CFR2.714.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A3761988-06-22022 June 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution (Necnp) Reply to Applicant & NRC Staff Response to Necnp Contentions on Spmc.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A3991988-06-22022 June 1988 Reply of Massachussetts Atty General to Responses of NRC Staff and Applicant to Contentions 7 Through 83 Filed by Massachussetts Atty General.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A5261988-06-22022 June 1988 Town of Amesbury Reply to NRC Staff & Applicant Responses to Town of Amesbury Contentions on Seabrook Plan for Massachussetts Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A8701988-06-20020 June 1988 Reply of Commonwealth of Ma Atty General to Responses of NRC Staff & Applicant to First Six Contentions Filed by Commonwealth of Ma Atty General.* ML20151N6271988-06-17017 June 1988 Town of Salisbury Reply to Applicant Response to Intervenor Contentions on Seabrook Plan for State of Ma Communities ML20151A8361988-06-17017 June 1988 Reply of Town of West Newbury to Responses of Applicant & NRC Staff to Intervenors Contentions Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151N6461988-06-17017 June 1988 Town of Salisbury Amended Contentions Re Applicant Plan for State of Ma Communities.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-20
[Table view] Category:RESPONSES & CONTENTIONS
MONTHYEARML20209H9101999-07-20020 July 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Hearing.* with Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20199F7641999-01-21021 January 1999 Answer of Montaup Electric Co to Motion of Ui for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Requests Motion Be Denied on Basis of Late Filing.With Certificate of Svc ML20206Q0151999-01-12012 January 1999 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Answer to Petition to Intervene of New England Power Co.* If Commission Deems It Appropriate to Explore Issues Further in Subpart M Hearing Context,Naesco Will Participate.With Certificate of Svc ML20199A4331999-01-11011 January 1999 Motion of United Illuminating Co for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Company Requests That Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time Be Granted.With Certificate of Svc ML20198P7181998-12-31031 December 1998 Motion of Nepco for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* Moves to Intervene in Transfer of Montaup Seabrook Ownership Interest & Petitions for Summary Relief or for Hearing ML20237C6981998-08-18018 August 1998 Sapl/Necnp Reply to Naesco Response to Proposed Contentions.* Board Should Admit Sapl/Necnp Contentions 1-4 & North Atlantic Energy Svcs Corp Arguments to Contrary. W/Certificate of Svc ML20237C6791998-08-18018 August 1998 Sapl/New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Reply to Staff Answer to Contentions.* Petitioners Believe Board Can & Should Give Cases Consideration W/O Filing of Addl,But Not Substantively Different Contention.W/Certificate of Svc ML20237A0501998-08-10010 August 1998 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Response to Proposed Contentions.* Petitioners Failed to Propose Admissible Contention.Request for Hearing & Petition to Intervene,As Applied to Both Petitioners Should Be Denied ML20236X9281998-08-10010 August 1998 NRC Staff Answer to Contentions.* for Reasons Stated,All of Contentions Proposed Should Be Rejected & Proceeding Should Be Terminated.W/Certificate of Svc ML20066H2581991-02-14014 February 1991 Response of Ma Atty General & Necnp to ASLB Order of 910124.* Intervenors Believe ASLB Should Reopen Record, Permit Discovery & Hold Hearing on Beach Sheltering Issues. W/Certificate of Svc ML19332D7241989-11-21021 November 1989 Intervenors Motion for Clarification Or,In Alternative,For Reconsideration.* Clarification or Reconsideration of Scheduling Requirements Set by Commission 891121 Order Requested.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19332D5191989-11-15015 November 1989 Applicant Answer to Intervenors Motion to Admit late-filed Contention & Reopen Record Based Upon Withdrawal of Commonwealth of Ma Emergency Broadcast Sys Network & Wcgy.* Motion Should Be Denied Since Results Unlikely to Change ML19325E0171989-10-20020 October 1989 Applicant Answer to Intervenors Second Motion to Admit Contentions on 890927 Emergency Plan Exercise.* Motion to Assert Addl Bases for Original Onsite Exercise Contention JI-Onsite Ex-1 Should Be Denied.W/Certificate of Svc ML19325E0011989-10-20020 October 1989 Applicant Response to Intervenors Motion to Amend Intervenors Motions of 890929 & 1013 to Admit Contentions on 890927 Onsite Emergency Plan Exercise.* Issue Re Admittance Committed to Board Discretion.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20248J3511989-10-13013 October 1989 Intervenors Second Motion to Admit Contentions on 890927 Emergency Plan Exercise.* Advises That Applicant Contentions Filed on 890929 to Admit Addl Bases Re Scope of Onsite Exercsise Should Be Admitted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20248J0601989-09-28028 September 1989 Intervenors Motion to Admit Contentions on 890927 Emergency Plan Exercise.* Requests Hearing & to Engage in Discovery for Hearing on Contention.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20247Q6761989-09-22022 September 1989 Intervenors Second Informational Suppl to Low Power Contentions Filed on 890721 & 0828.* Incorporates Encl Plant Startup Test Procedure 1-ST-22,Rev 2 Into Low Power Testing Contentions.W/Supporting Info & Certificate of Svc ML20246N1001989-09-0101 September 1989 Intervenors Reply to Responses of Applicant & Staff Re Intervenors Motion to Admit Contention,Or,In Alternative,To Reopen Record & Request for Hearing.* Contention Raises New Issues & Should Be Admitted.W/Certificate of Svc ML20247E0321989-07-21021 July 1989 Intervenors Motion to Admit Contention,Or in Alternative,To Reopen Record & Request for Hearing.* Requests Contentions Re Deficiencies in Training,Mgt Control,Supervision, Communication & Procedure Compliance Be Admitted ML20246P2041989-07-0505 July 1989 Joint Intervenor (Ji) Contentions on Spmc & June 1988 Graded Exercise.* ML20248F4691989-04-0303 April 1989 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League (Sapl) Trial Brief on Contention Ji 56 & Sapl Contentions EX-2,4,6,7,8,12,13 & 14.* Svc List Encl ML20206M9761988-11-23023 November 1988 NRC Staff Response to 881114 Board Order Requesting Comments on Significance of ALAB-903 for Seabrook Proposed General Exercise Contentions.* Contentions & Bases Should Be Denied. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206M9431988-11-22022 November 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Comments on Significance of ALAB-903 to Seabrook Offsite Exercise Contentions.* Svc List Encl ML20206M9031988-11-22022 November 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Comments on Significance of ALAB-903 to Exercise Contentions.* Svc List Encl ML20205R7201988-11-0202 November 1988 Town of Hampton Contention on Applicant Plan to Fund Decommissioning Costs of Seabrook Station.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205R5661988-11-0202 November 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Contentions on Applicant Plan in Response to NRC Order CLI-88-07.* Supporting Documentation Encl ML20205R5441988-11-0202 November 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Jm Shannon late-filed Contentions Concerning Joint Applicant Financial Qualifications to Operate Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205R4971988-11-0202 November 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Contentions on Applicant Decommissioning Plan,Motion for Stay of Low Power Operation & Motion to Reopen Record.* Supporting Info & Svc List Encl ML20205R4821988-11-0202 November 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Jm Shannon late-filed Contentions Concerning Joint Applicant Decommissioning Plan for Seabrook Nuclear Power Station.* ML20205E0011988-10-24024 October 1988 Reply of Commonwealth of Ma Atty General to Responses of NRC Staff & Applicant to Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Exercise Contentions.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20205E0271988-10-21021 October 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution (Necnp) & Town of Hampton (Toh) Reply to Applicant & NRC Staff Responses to Contentions Toh/Necnp EX-2 & Toh/Necnp EX-3.* Svc List Encl ML20205D8051988-10-21021 October 1988 Town of Hampton & New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Reply to Responses of Staff & Applicant to Intervenor Contentions on Graded Exercise.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20206C1951988-10-18018 October 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League (Sapl) Reply to Applicant & Staff Responses to Sapl Contentions on June 1988 Graded Exercise.* Svc List Encl ML20204G9731988-10-13013 October 1988 NRC Staff Response to Intervenors Contentions on Graded Exercise.* Proposed General Exercise Contentions Should Be Admitted for Litigation & Proferred Contentions Should Be Denied Admission.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154S4571988-09-28028 September 1988 Applicant Response to Intervenor Contentions on June 1988 Seabrook Exercise.* Intervenor Contentions Should Be Disposed Of.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154P3461988-09-21021 September 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution & Town of Hampton Contentions Re 1988 Exercise of Offsite Plans & Preparedness for Plant Emergency Planning Zone.* Svc List Encl ML20154K8741988-09-21021 September 1988 Commonwealth of Ma Atty General Exercise Contentions Submitted in Response to June 1988 Plant Initial full- Participation Exercise.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154K9331988-09-21021 September 1988 Town of Hampton & New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Emergency Planning Contentions on 880628-29 Exercise.* Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20154N9061988-09-20020 September 1988 Seacoast Anti-Pollution League Contentions on Graded Exercise.* Svc List Encl ML20154D7431988-09-12012 September 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution Petition for Review of ALAB-899.* Petition Should Be Granted on Basis That Integrity of RCS Significantly Paramount to Safe Operation of Plant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20151A6461988-07-0707 July 1988 NRC Staff Response to Town of Salisbury Amended Contentions Re Applicant Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Applicant Untimely Amends to Contentions Should Be Rejected. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151A6301988-07-0606 July 1988 NRC Staff Response to City of Haverhill Detailed Contentions.* City of Haverhill late-filed Contentions Should Be Rejected.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196G7031988-06-27027 June 1988 Applicant Response to City of Haverhill Detailed Contentions.* Contentions Should Be Rejected & City Should Be Denied Admission as Party,Per 10CFR2.714.Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A3761988-06-22022 June 1988 New England Coalition on Nuclear Pollution (Necnp) Reply to Applicant & NRC Staff Response to Necnp Contentions on Spmc.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A3991988-06-22022 June 1988 Reply of Massachussetts Atty General to Responses of NRC Staff and Applicant to Contentions 7 Through 83 Filed by Massachussetts Atty General.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A5261988-06-22022 June 1988 Town of Amesbury Reply to NRC Staff & Applicant Responses to Town of Amesbury Contentions on Seabrook Plan for Massachussetts Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20196A8701988-06-20020 June 1988 Reply of Commonwealth of Ma Atty General to Responses of NRC Staff & Applicant to First Six Contentions Filed by Commonwealth of Ma Atty General.* ML20151N6271988-06-17017 June 1988 Town of Salisbury Reply to Applicant Response to Intervenor Contentions on Seabrook Plan for State of Ma Communities ML20151A8361988-06-17017 June 1988 Reply of Town of West Newbury to Responses of Applicant & NRC Staff to Intervenors Contentions Re Seabrook Plan for Commonwealth of Ma Communities.* Certificate of Svc Encl ML20151N6461988-06-17017 June 1988 Town of Salisbury Amended Contentions Re Applicant Plan for State of Ma Communities.Certificate of Svc Encl 1999-07-20
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20217H9511999-10-21021 October 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Proceeding Re Nepco 990315 Application Seeking Commission Approval of Indirect License Transfers Consolidated,Petitioners Granted Standing & Two Issues Admitted.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 991021 ML20217N2561999-10-21021 October 1999 Transcript of Affirmation Session on 990121 in Rockville, Maryland Re Memorandum & Order Responding to Petitions to Intervene Filed by co-owners of Seabrook Station Unit 1 & Millstone Station Unit Three.Pp 1-3 ML20211L5141999-09-0202 September 1999 Comment on Draft Reg Guide DG-4006, Demonstrating Compliance with Radiological Criteria for License Termination. Author Requests Info as to When Seabrook Station Will Be Shut Down ML20211J1451999-08-24024 August 1999 Comment Opposing NRC Consideration of Waiving Enforcement Action Against Plants That Operate Outside Terms of Licenses Due to Y2K Problems ML20210S5641999-08-13013 August 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co,Western Massachusetts Electric Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp to Strike Unauthorized Response of Nepco.* Unauthorized Response Fails to Comply with Commission Policy.With Certificate of Svc ML20210Q7531999-08-11011 August 1999 Order Approving Application Re Corporate Merger (Canal Electric Co). Canal Shall Provide Director of NRR Copy of Any Application,At Time Filed to Transfer Grants of Security Interests or Liens from Canal to Proposed Parent ML20210P6271999-08-10010 August 1999 Response of New England Power Company.* Nu Allegations Unsupported by Any Facts & No Genuine Issues of Matl Facts in Dispute.Commission Should Approve Application Without Hearing ML20210H8311999-08-0303 August 1999 Reply of Connecticut Light & Power Co,Western Massachusetts Electric Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp to Response of New England Power Co to Requests for Hearing.* Petitioners Request Hearing on Stated Issues.With Certificate of Svc ML20210J8501999-08-0303 August 1999 Order Approving Transfer of License & Conforming Amend.North Atlantic Energy Service Corp Authorized to Act as Agent for Joint Owners of Seabrook Unit 1 ML20211J1551999-07-30030 July 1999 Comment Opposing That NRC Allow Seabrook NPP to Operate Outside of Technical Specifications Due to Possible Y2K Problems ML20210E3011999-07-27027 July 1999 Response of New England Power Co to Requests for Hearing. Intervenors Have Presented No Justification for Oral Hearing in This Proceeding.Commission Should Reject Intervenors Request for Oral Hearing & Approve Application ML20209H9101999-07-20020 July 1999 Motion of Connecticut Light & Power Co & North Atlantic Energy Corp for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Hearing.* with Certificate of Svc & Notice of Appearance ML20195H1911999-06-15015 June 1999 Application of Montaup Electric Co & New England Power Co for Transfer of Licenses & Ownership Interests.Requests That Commission Consent to Two Indirect Transfers of Control & Direct Transfer ML20206A1611999-04-26026 April 1999 Memorandum & Order.* Informs That Montaup,Little Bay Power Corp & Nepco Settled Differences Re Transfer of Ownership of Seabrook Unit 1.Intervention Petition Withdrawn & Proceeding Terminated.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990426 ML20205M7621999-04-15015 April 1999 Notice of Withdrawal of Intervention of New England Power Co.* New England Power Co Requests That Intervention in Proceeding Be Withdrawn & Hearing & Related Procedures Be Terminated.With Certificate of Svc CLI-99-06, Order.* Joint Request for ten-day Extension of Schedule Set Forth in CLI-99-06 in Order to Facilitate Parties Settlement Efforts Granted,With Exception of Date of Hearing. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 9904071999-04-0707 April 1999 Order.* Joint Request for ten-day Extension of Schedule Set Forth in CLI-99-06 in Order to Facilitate Parties Settlement Efforts Granted,With Exception of Date of Hearing. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 990407 ML20205G0921999-04-0505 April 1999 Joint Motion of All Active Participants for 10 Day Extension to Permit Continuation of Settlement Discussion.* Participants Request That Procedural Schedule Be Extended by 10 Days.With Certificate of Svc ML20205G3091999-03-31031 March 1999 Petition That Individuals Responsible for Discrimination Against Contract Electrician at Plant as Noted in OI Rept 1-98-005 Be Banned by NRC from Participation in Licensed Activities for at Least 5 Yrs ML20204E6401999-03-24024 March 1999 Protective Order.* Issues Protective Order to Govern Use of All Proprietary Data Contained in License Transfer Application or in Participants Written Submission & Oral Testimony.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990324 ML20204G7671999-03-23023 March 1999 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50.54(a) Re Direct Final Rule,Changes to QA Programs ML20207K1941999-03-12012 March 1999 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Participation in Proceeding.* Naesco Wished to Remain on Svc List for All Filings.Option to Submit post-hearing Amicus Curiae Brief Will Be Retained by Naesco.With Certificate of Svc ML20207H4921999-02-12012 February 1999 Comment on Draft Contingency Plan for Year 2000 Issue in Nuclear Industry.Util Agrees to Approach Proposed by NEI ML20203F9471999-02-0909 February 1999 License Transfer Application Requesting NRC Consent to Indirect Transfer of Control of Interest in Operating License NPF-86 ML20199F7641999-01-21021 January 1999 Answer of Montaup Electric Co to Motion of Ui for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Requests Motion Be Denied on Basis of Late Filing.With Certificate of Svc ML20199H0451999-01-21021 January 1999 Answer of Little Bay Power Corp to Motion of Ui for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Requests That Ui Petition to Intervene & for Hearing Be Denied for Reasons Stated.With Certificate of Svc ML20199D2461999-01-19019 January 1999 Supplemental Affidavit of Js Robinson.* Affidavit of Js Robinson Providing Info Re Financial Results of Baycorp Holding Ltd & Baycorp Subsidiary,Great Bay Power Corp. with Certificate of Svc ML20199D2311999-01-19019 January 1999 Response of New England Power Co to Answers of Montaup Electric Co & Little Bay Power Corp.* Nep Requests That Nep Be Afforded Opportunity to File Appropriate Rule Challenge with Commission Pursuant to 10CFR2.1329 ML20206R1041999-01-13013 January 1999 Answer of Little Bay Power Corp to Motion of New England Power Co for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* with Certificate of Svc ML20206Q8451999-01-12012 January 1999 Written Comments of Massachusetts Municipal Wholesale Electric Co.* Requests That Commission Consider Potential Financial Risk to Other Joint Owners Associated with License Transfer.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 990114 ML20199A4741999-01-12012 January 1999 Answer of Montaup Electric Co to Motion of Nepco for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* Nepco 990104 Motion Should Be Denied for Reasons Stated.With Certificate of Svc ML20206Q0151999-01-12012 January 1999 North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Answer to Petition to Intervene of New England Power Co.* If Commission Deems It Appropriate to Explore Issues Further in Subpart M Hearing Context,Naesco Will Participate.With Certificate of Svc ML20199A4331999-01-11011 January 1999 Motion of United Illuminating Co for Leave to Intervene & Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time.* Company Requests That Petition to Allow Intervention out-of-time Be Granted.With Certificate of Svc ML20198P7181998-12-31031 December 1998 Motion of Nepco for Leave to Intervene & Petition for Summary Relief Or,In Alternative,For Hearing.* Moves to Intervene in Transfer of Montaup Seabrook Ownership Interest & Petitions for Summary Relief or for Hearing ML20198P7551998-12-30030 December 1998 Affidavit of J Robinson.* Affidavit of J Robinson Describing Events to Date in New England Re Premature Retirement of Npps,Current Plans to Construct New Generation in Region & Impact on Seabrook Unit 1 Operation.With Certificate of Svc ML20195K4061998-11-24024 November 1998 Memorandum & Order.* North Atlantic Energy Services Corp Granted Motion to Withdraw Proposed Amends & Dismiss Related Adjudicatory Proceedings as Moot.Board Decision LBP-98-23 Vacated.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981124 ML20155J1071998-11-0909 November 1998 NRC Staff Answer to North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Motion for Leave to File Reply.* Staff Does Not Object to North Atlantic Energy Svc Corp Motion.With Certificate of Svc ML20155D0041998-10-30030 October 1998 Motion for Leave to File Reply.* Licensee Requests Leave to Reply to Petitioner 981026 Response to Licensee 981015 Motion to Terminate Proceedings.Reply Necessary to Assure That Commission Is Fully Aware of Licensee Position ML20155D0121998-10-30030 October 1998 Reply to Petitioner Response to Motion to Terminate Proceedings.* Licensee Views Segmentation Issue as Moot & Requests Termination of Subj Proceedings.With Certificate of Svc ML20155B1641998-10-26026 October 1998 Response to Motion by Naesco to Withdraw Applications & to Terminate Proceedings.* If Commission Undertakes to Promptly Proceed on Issue on Generic Basis,Sapl & Necnp Will Have No Objection to Naesco Motion.With Certificate of Svc ML20154K8751998-10-15015 October 1998 Motion to Withdraw Applications & to Terminate Proceedings.* NRC Does Not Intend to Oppose Motion.With Certificate of Svc ML17265A8071998-10-0606 October 1998 Comment on Integrated Review of Assessment Process for Commercial Npps.Util Endorses Comments Being Provided by NEI on Behalf of Nuclear Industry ML20154C8171998-10-0606 October 1998 Notice of Appointment of Adjudicatory Employee.* Notice Given That W Reckley Appointed as Commission Adjudicatory Employee to Advise Commission on Issues Related to Review of LBP-98-23.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981006 CLI-98-18, Order.* Grants Joint Motion Filed by Naesco,Sapl & Necnp for Two Week Deferral of Briefing Schedule Set by Commission in CLI-98-18.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 9810061998-10-0505 October 1998 Order.* Grants Joint Motion Filed by Naesco,Sapl & Necnp for Two Week Deferral of Briefing Schedule Set by Commission in CLI-98-18.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 981006 ML20153H4471998-10-0101 October 1998 Joint Motion of Schedule Deferral.* Naesco,Sapl & Necnp Jointly Request Temporary Deferral of Briefing Schedule as Established by Commission Order of 980917 (CLI-98-18). with Certificate of Svc ML20154F9891998-09-29029 September 1998 License Transfer Application Requesting Consent for Transfer of Montaup Electric Co Interest in Operating License NPF-86 for Seabrook Station,Unit 1,to Little Bay Power Corp ML20154D7381998-09-21021 September 1998 Affidavit of FW Getman Requesting Exhibit 1 to License Transfer Application Be Withheld from Public Disclosure,Per 10CFR2.790 ML20153C7791998-09-18018 September 1998 Comment Supporting Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Reporting Requirements for Nuclear Power Reactors.Util Endorses NRC Staff Focus on Operability & Funtionality of Equipment & NEI Comments ML20151Z5611998-09-18018 September 1998 Order.* Pursuant to Commission Order CLI-98-18 Re Seabrook Unit 1 Proceeding,Schedule Described in Board 980904 Memorandum & Order Hereby Revoked Pending Further Action. with Certificate of Svc.Served on 980918 ML20151Y0331998-09-17017 September 1998 Order.* All Parties,Including Util,May File Brief No Later than 981007.Brief Shall Not Exceed 30 Pages.Commission May Schedule Oral Argument to Discuss Issues,After Receiving Responses.With Certificate of Svc.Served on 980917 ML20153E8771998-09-16016 September 1998 Comment Opposing Draft NUREG-1633, Assessment of Use of Potassium Iodide (Ki) as Protective Action During Severe Reactor Accidents. Recommends That NRC Reverse Decision to Revise Emergency Planning Regulation as Listed 1999-09-02
[Table view] |
Text
. s UNITED STATES OF AMERICA '?
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
? SD' 27 Ali:54 September e2,4,_1982
, e e. + . ,
-v;( L Before the -
ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In the matter of: )
)
)
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE) Docket Nos.: 50-443 ET AL. ) and
) 50-444
)
(Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2) )
. STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE'S OBJECTION AND MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD'S ORDER OF GEPTEMBER 13, 1982 NOW COME the State of New Hampshire and Attorney General Gregory H. Smith, pursuant to 10 C.F.R. Section 2.730, and request that the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board
(" Board") reconsider portions of its September 13, 1982 Menorandum and Order (" Order").
I. INTRODUCTION l The State of New Hampshire requests the Board to l reconsider its findings and conclusions relative to five of New Hampshire's Contentions that the Board denied in its September l
13, 1982 Order. The Contentions on which New i;ampshire 8209280306 820924 PDR ADOCK 05000 @
. a requests reconsideration are: NH Contentions 2 (Systems Interaction), 5 (Liquid Pathways), 6 (Environmental Qaalification of Safety-Related Equipment), 12 (Quality Assurance), and 14 (Reliable Operation Under On-Site Emergency Power). New Hampshire asserts that it is error to deny these Contentions since they raise issues important to public safety, relate to the primary responsibility of the Licensing Board (i.e., to provide adequate assurance that the facility will operate in a manner consistent with public safety), provide i
adequate notice to the parties of the issues to be litigated, and are necessary to provide public confidence in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) proceedings.
t II. THE FUNCTIOli OF CO!!TENTIOtiS Ill LICE!ISING BOARD PROCEEDIllGS The Licensing Board is charged, under the Atomic Energy Act, with ensuring that a nuclear facility will be operated without endangering public health and safety. 42 U.S.C. Section 2201, et seq.; see 10 C.F.R. Section 50.40(a);
see also Power Reactor Development Corp. v. Electrical Union, 367 U.S. 396 (1961). This responsibility requires that the Board be more than an unpire "merely calling balls and i
strikes," but that it actively review the issues proposed to be litigated by the parties. Cleveland Electric Illuuinating Co.
[
(Perry liuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2) ALAB-443, 6 11.R.C.
741, 752 (1977). This review is for the purpose of judging 1
O O compliance with the formalities of NRC practice, and to ensure that there is a full and fair hearing on proposed contentions which raise legitimate concerns on compliance with regulatory requirements relating to safe operation of the facility.
In order to accomplish its important function, the Board has been vested with discretionary powers in determining the contentions to be litigated in a licensing proceeding. See 10 C.F.R. Section 2.718(m). It has the discretion not only to consider the contentions phrased by intervenors, but also to linit contentions which, though broadly phrased, may have valid parts. The Board may even form its own contentions, based on the suggestions of intervenors or its own motion. Pennsylvania Power and Light Co. (Susquehana Steam Electric Station (Units 1 and 2), LBP 79-6, 9 N.R.C. 291 (1979)).
Where a contention has been offered that suffers only minor technical deficiencies but which raises a valid issue, it is necessary and proper for the Board to admit the contention, and rephrase or limit it in appropriate fashion. Although the Board, in the present proceedings, has indicated that it would not recast contentions, such a position, if exercised to I
prevent, based on mere formalism, a valid contention from being admitted, would run afoul of the Board's duties under the Atomic Energy Act. He do not understand that the Board intended to take such an inflexible position.
In summary, where the Board perceives that a valid issue of reasonable scope with adequate basis has been raised, it should admit the contention. If the contention proves to have little merit, the summary disposition procedures will address it. To deny the contention is to grant summary disposition without an opportunity for discovery or an opportunity to be heard.
Finally, the operating license proceeding is a
" pleadings" practice which requires that contentions place the parties on adequate notice of the issues to be litigated.
Philadelphia Electric Co. (Peach Bottom Atomic Power Stations, Units 2 and 3) ALAB-216, 8 A.E.C. 1, 20-21 (1974). If a contention places the parties on adequate notice, then it should be admitted.
III. THE 11EU HA!!PS!! IRE CONTEllTIO!!S ARE ADt1ISSIBLE UllDER T!!E POLICY AtlD PRACTICE OF Tile 11RC A. till 2, Systems Interaction The problem of systems interaction, the interaction of safety and non-safety systems which results in the inability of safety systems to respond as designed, was recognized as an important contributing factor to the accident at Three-!!ile Island. This issue has been adnitted as a contention in at least one proceeding before a licensing board Long Island Lighting Conpany (Shoreham !!uclear Power plant),
Docket 50-322 (llarch 15, 1982)). tiew Ilampshire has presented in this proceeding the same language which was accepted in the Shoreham proceeding (see fill Revised Contention 1) .
f This contention claims that the FSAR has not demonstrated. compliance with the requirements of NUREG 0737, I(C)(1) and 45 Fed. Reg. 40101. NUREG 0737, I(C)(1) requires a reevaluation of transients and accidents because the present guidelines did not " address the availability of [certain safety] systems under expected plant conditions nor do they address corrective or alternative actions that should be ,
performed to mitigate the event should these systems or 4
components fail." NUREG 0737, I(C)(1)-2. This requirement is specifically referred to in the basis predented for NH 2.
Further, 45 Fed. Reg. 40101 and 40103 require that " events or accident sequences that lead to releases shall include but not be limited to those that can reasonably be expected to occur."
While it is admitted that these regulatory requirements are general in scope, nonetheless, they must be complied with and j the FSAR does not demonstrate such compliance. Based upon the
- above requirements, it is clear that the NRC requires that the applicant consider the effect of the interaction of safety and l non-safety systems on plant safety. To date, the FSAR and the i draft SER omit adequate analysis of this important issue.
- Though the applicant and staff may argue that New Hampshire's contention is not formalistically correct, it certainly places the parties on adequate notice of the precise requirements which the State alleges have not been met. The contention should be admitted.
-6 -
B. NH 5, Liquid Pathway This contention asserts that failure of the applicant to develop groundwater information regarding the Seabrook area makes the liquid pathway problem a major consideration which must be dealt with by the applicant.
Public Service Company of New Hampshire (PSCO) has determined that no detailed liquid pathway analysis is required. This is contrary to the specific requirements of 45 Fed. Reg. 40101, 40102, which the State referred to in its refiled contention set forth below.
- 5. Liquid Pathway Impact The Applicant has not satisfied _the requirements of 10 C.F.R. Section 51.21 and the requirements of the Commission's Interim Policy Statement issued June 13, 1980, 45 Fed. Reg. 40101, by failing to consider adequately liquid pathway accident impacts and corrective measures.
While the Board states in its denial that New Hampshire does not state a lack of compliance with Commission's interim
- policy statement on Class 9 accidents," in fact in its revision the State of New Hampshire did specifically declare in the i
contention lack of compliance with 45 Fed. Reg. 40101.
The absence of information related to a liquid pathway analysis in the PSAR provides the basis for this contention.
This Licensing Board has indicated that the absence of information in the FSAR is an adequate basis for a contention.
See Order at 80.
.~,..m- - < - - ,c ,.----,,,,,.,i-rm .-e , -- 7- ,.,. - - - -
. e,, , , - , , , , - -w-, , ,rw,-- . - . , - <,c-
New Hampshire has raised a valid question with regard to compliance with NRC regulations, and certainly, the parties have been placed on notice o the State's concern on an issue appropriately limited in scope. To deny the contention amounts to summary disposition on this issue without the opportunity for discovery or hearing.
C. NH 6, Environmental Quali.fication of Safety Related Equipnent The Licensing Board has recognized that this issue is extremely important to plant safety (Order at 16). NH 6 has four important parts (see NH6 (a)-(d)). The Licensing Board has admitted as a contention (NECNP I(B)(2)) the issue of time duration over which equipment is qualified. This issue is similar to that which is raised in NH 6(b). New Hampshire believec that with regard to Parts a and c of NH 6, the Licensing Board appropriately requested further specificity which the State will attempt to provide at the earliest possiule date. However, the State believes that Part (d) of the contention, relating to the effects of aging and cumulative radiation, is sufficiently specific and should be admitted.
The effect of aging and cumulative radiation is critically important to plant safety. The Licensing Board has admitted a similar contention uhich is no more specific (NECNP I(B)(2), Order at 39). NH 6(d) places the parties on adequate notice of the issue to be litigated. The Board has simply to limit the contention to that which is proposed in NH 6(d). As
. . - - ~ . - . . .
previously pointed out by New Hampshire, NUREG 0737, II(B)(2) places requirements on applicants relating to the fact that
" safety equipment may be unduly degraded by the radiation fields during post-accident operations of these systems."
NUREG 0737, II(B)(2)-1. Clearly, the Board has discretion to l
limit the scope of the contention as it sees fit. Since New Hampshire has raised a legitimate issue for litigation and has alleged failure of the applicant to comply with NRC requirements, the contention as to effects of aging and i
cumulative radiation should be admitted.
D. NH 12, Quality Assurance New Hampshire admits that the sstablishment of a quality assurance program is a construction permit proceeding issue. However, execution of such a quality assurance program is uniquely an operating license proceeding issue. The operating license proceeding is concerned with whether a facility is capable of operating as designed to adequately protect the public health and safety. 10 C.F.R. Section 50.40. A fundamental issue in whether the plant has been constructed properly is whether the quality assurance program has been properly executed.
Certainly, the specifics contained in NH 12 and NECNP 2(A)(2) place the Applicant, the Staff, and the Licensing Board on notice of the alleged problems which the intervenors seek to litigate. There can be no dispute that if the
allegations are proven to be symptomatic of a greater problem, then there is serious concern of the ability of the Seabrook facility to operate properly. Although the Licensing Board has objected to the useage of the word " design" within the NECNP 2(A)(2) contention, the Board has the discretion to limit the scope of the contention if it desires. To deny a contention on this issue is to ignore a potentially serious problem and to deny the parties an opportunity for discovery and hearing.
E. NH 14, Reliable Operation Under On-Site Emergency Power i
By submitting this contention and its basis, including the refiled statement, New Hampshire has identified a concern over the starting reliability of diesel generators. As stated, certainly this contention is sufficient to place the parties on notice of the issue to be litigated. This is a narrow issue which is suitable for summary disposition should discovery reveal no factual basis. As such, the contention should be admitted. Denial of the contention implies an overemphasis on the formalities of NRC pleadings without equal concern for the validity of issues sought to be raised. This appearance of overconcern for formality undermines the public confidence in the NRC proceeding.
F. _Tne Board Should Reconsider its Proposed Discovery and Hearing Schedule In scheduling the course of discovery and the hearing in Appendix A of its September 13, 1982 Order, the Board recognized the difficulty in setting a rigid schedule, and established only " target dates." Order at 5. While the State is committed to pursuing discovery expeditiously, the projected schedule appears likely to place impossible burdens on the intervenors.
The schedule adopted by the Board provides i
insufficient time for discovery. Even the schedule proposed by the staff at the July 16, 1982, prehearing conference allowed four months for discovery requests, whereas the Board's schedule permits only three months. The parties should not be required to rush through three short months of discovery without strong justification.
Given that the SER is not to be submitted until November and that the various emergency plans will only be in rudimentary, draft form by the end of the year, discovery on contentions admitted after the filing of these documents will have to extend at least several months into 1983. Ending a forced discovery period months earlier (on December 15, 1982) would, therefore, serve no useful purpose. Additional time for discovery should be provided now, so that the parties can plan accordingly, allowing for a more meaningful period of discovery and a fairer hearing. The proposed date for beginning hearings, June 14, 1983, need not necessarily be affected.
4 WHEREFORE, the State of New Hampshire respectfully requests that the Licensing Board reconsider its order of September 13, 1982:
I. Adnit NH Contentions 2, 5, 6, 12, and 14 as phrased; or II. Adnit NH Contentions 2, 5, 6, 12, and 14 with such limitations or rephrasing as the Board believes are necessary for a fair and equitable treatnent in light of the purpose of these proceedings; and III. Revise its Schedule for the Proceeding to allow at i
least four nonths for discovery on the contentions admitted by this Order.
IV. Such other and further relief as may be just and equitable.
Respectfully submitted, THE STATE OF NEU HAMPSHIRE GREGORY H. SMITH ATTORNEY GENERAL By M& %
E. Tupper Mihder Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Div.
Office of Attorney General State House Annex Concord, New Hampshire 03301 Tel. (603) 271-3679
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I, E. Tupper Kinder, Esquire, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion for Reconsideration has been mailed this 24th day of September, 1982, by first class mail, postage prepaid, to:
Helen F. Hoyt, Chm. Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U.S. NRC U.S. .NRC Washington, D.C. 20555 Uashington, D.C. 20555 Dr. Oscar 11. Paris Paula Gold, Asst. AG Administrative Judge Stephen M. Leonard, Asst. AG Atomic Safety and Licensing Jo Ann Shotwell, Asst. AG Board Panel Office of the Attorney General U.S. NRC One Ashburton Place, 19th Floor Washington, D.C. 20555 Boston, MA 02108 Lynn Chong Nicholas J. Costello Bill Corkun 1st Essex District Gary McCool Whitehall Road Box 65 Amesbury, MA 01913 Plymouth, NH 03264 Roy P. Lessy, Jr., Esquire Mrs. Beverly Holl-Robert Perliss, Esquire ingsworth Office of Executive Legal 822 Lafayette Road Director P.O. Box 596 U.S. NRC Hampton, NH 03842 Washington, D.C. 20555 Robert A. Backus, Esquire Willian S. Jordan, II, Esquire 116 Lowell Street Ellyn R. Weiss, Esquire i P.O. Box 516 Harmon & Heiss
! Manchester, NH 03105 1725 I Street, N.U.
Suite 506 Washington, D.C. 20006 Phillip Ahrens, Esquire Edward J. McDermott, Esquire Assistant Attorney General Sanders and McDermott State liouse, Station 96 408 Lafayette Road Augusta, ME. 04333 Hampton, NH 03842 Donald L. Herzberger, MD Senator Robert L. Preston liitchcock Hospital State of New Ilanpshire Hanover, Nil 03755 Senate Chambers Concord, NH 03301 3
. - , , , . - . . . - - . , ,. ,-+--m, -. . _ . - _ _ _ _ . _ - . _ . _ , - - . , - . .
Wilfred L. Sanders, Esquire Thomas G. Dignan, Jr., Esquire Sanders and !!cDermott Ropes and Gray 408 Lafayette Road 225 Franklin Street i
Hampton, NH 03842 Boston, MA 02110 Robert L. Chiesa, Esquire Docketing and Service Sec.
Wadleigh, Starr,-Peters, Office of the Secretary Dunn & Kohls U.S. NRC 95 Market Street Washington, D.C. 20555 Manchester, NH 03101 W J^ '
E. Tupper Rinder i
l 1
-p- w2--- ---g.--- - - - , - - . q pi-w,+. e.---emp--g.9 -w&97.--y.-m p m gm ky*y--w--tvg-*+ gy%yy- *.y-*p g y < g & - pg w pe- y.e p +w yewvy,g-g--- - - -goe-,er w-o e %,e ya,e