ML20072T555

From kanterella
Revision as of 15:57, 21 May 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Application for Amends to Licenses DPR-77 & DPR-79,revising Footnote Associated W/Ts 4.6.1.1 to Add Msv Vaults to List of Areas Where Containment Penetration Integrity Not Required to Be Verified Once Every 31 Days
ML20072T555
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/09/1994
From: Shell R
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20072T558 List:
References
TVA-SQN-TS-94, TVA-SQN-TS-94-0, NUDOCS 9409150246
Download: ML20072T555 (3)


Text

'

i n

A Tennessee vaue r uw, ex ove sa axo sauca,sy Tewssee 3ma l

I September 9,1994 l

TVA-SON-TS-94-08 10 CFR 50.90 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

In the Matter of ) Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority ) 50-328 SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT (SON) - TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION (TS)

CHANGE 94-08, " REVISION OF SPECIFICATION 4.6.1.1 FOOTNOTE TO ADD MAIN STEAM VALVE VAULTS TO THE EXCLUSION AREA - UNITS 1 AND 2" In accordance with 10 CFR 50.90, we are enclocing an amendment to Licenses.

DPR-77 and DPR-79 to change the TSs of SON Units 1 and 2. The proposed change revises the footnote associated with TS 4.6.1.1 to add the main steam valve vaults to the list of areas where containment penetration integrity is not required to be verified  :

once every 31 days for penetrations that are secured in the closed position. The valve vaults are low traffic areas due to the high temperatures and congestion, which are present at various locations within the vaults. As a result, the probability of these valves being misaligned during operation is remote. In addition, the high temperatures coupled with the physical congestion from valves, piping and structural steel, cause the valve vaults to be areas with significant personnel hazards. Approval of this change would reduce the amount of time employees are required to be exposed to this personnel hazard in order to maintain compliance with TS.

l The proposed TS change is identified in Enclosure 1. The justification for the l proposed TS change is provided in Enclosure 2. A proposed determination of no significant safety hazards consideration performed pursuant to 10 CFR 50.92 is provided in Enclosure 3.

9409150246 940909 PDR ADOCK 05000327 f P PDR 8 i

k

l t

l i

I l l

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 2 September 9,1994 l

l TVA requests that the proposed TS change be processed as soon as possible since it

! represents a reduction in exposure to a personnel hazard. TVA requests a 45-day implementation period for this TS change following issuance.

Please direct questions concerning this issue to Steve D. Gilley at (615) 843-7427.

l Sincerely, i -

R. H. Shell Manager SON Site Licensing Sworn to and su scri ed before me l thish day of 1994 I LNLD Notary Public My Commission Expires 97 Enclosures cc: See page 3

d U.S; Nuclear Regulatory Commission Page 3 September 9,1994 (Enclosures):

Mr. D. E. LaBarge, Project Manager Nuclear Regulatory Commission One White Flint, North 11555 Rockville Pike-Rockville, Maryland 20852-2739 Mr. Michael H. Mobley, Director (w/o Enclosures)

Division of Radiological Health 3rd Floor L & C Annex 401 Church Street Nashville, Tennessee 37243-1532 NRC Resident inspector Sequoyah Nuclear Plant 2600 lgou Ferry Road Soddy-Daisy, Tennessee 37379-3624' Regional Administrator U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region 11 101 Marietta Street, NW, Suite 2900 Atlanta, Georgia 30323 2711

_