ML20086T286
| ML20086T286 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 03/08/1991 |
| From: | Bhavin Patel CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20086T214 | List: |
| References | |
| FOIA-95-7 11.1, 11.1-R01, 11.1-R1, NUDOCS 9508020302 | |
| Download: ML20086T286 (40) | |
Text
- >
a a
ENVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE COVER SHEET H.B. ROBINSON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT EQDP NO. 11.1 , REVISION 1 TITLE: DEKORON INSTRUMENTATION CABLES EQUIPMENT TYPE: INSTRUMENT CABLE MANUFACTURER: SAMUEL MOORE MODEL NO. : EPDM & XLPO INSULATIONS NAME/ SIGNATURE
^
' 9 __ q m PREPARED BY: 0 ib ( l' .-
I'. u rb e h i M E L O DATE: 3' l' I/
REVIEWED BY:
(/
O 7et W u>c DA E: 8" f-9/
APPROVED BY: bv .0_. h d a COEL LEWJ DATE: 3-891 -
DESCRIPTION OF REVISION:
Updated Section 2. Removed test reports from Section 7.
Referenced specific EQ Reference File numbers for test reports removed from Section 7. Repaginated entire document.
I I
l i
CONTROLLED COPY # % ,\o !
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 1 of 40 9508020302 950200 PDR FOIA SUPIK95-7 PDR
'9.
r ' .:
y .
( )
-1 List of Effective Paaes !
Effective Paces Revision Cover Sheet 1
.)
i LEP 1 3 through'40 1 j
i i
i f
a i
i i
}
li
)
_. r i
-t i
i 1
i
-i J
5 f
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 2 of 40 !
l i
t 1...
- n >
Table of Contents
( ,
Section Title Pace Number L 1 References 4 l
2 Equipment List 6 3 Qualification Analysis
-l 3.1 Qualification Summary 8 '
3.2 Qualification Requirements 8 3.3 Qualification Documentation Assessment 12 3.4 Qualification Justification Analysis 18 1 1
4 Aging Data Base Matrix 24 !
-l 5 NRC IE Bulletins / Notices / Circulars 25 l 6 Maintenance Required to Maintain 26 Environmental Qualification 7 Qualification Test Reports 27 8 General Information 28 1
l l
l i
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 3 of-40 l l .
1
_ i
-L.
}
SECTION l' ,
\
1.O REEEEENCES i i
1.1 " Qualification Test of Electric Cables Under. a Simulated i IDCA/DBE by Sequential Exposure to . Environments 1 of ;
Radiation, Thermal Aging, Steam and Chemical Spray,"
Isomedix, Inc. , dated June 1978 '(Ref. File 111) .
l 5
1.2- Letter, Mark A. Tabbey (Samuel Moore) to Michael . D. ;
Thomas (Impell) w/ Enclosures, dated 2/24/89 (See Section- i 8, Attachment 1).
j
, 1.3 "Nordel Engineering Properties and Applications," DuPont I Document.No. E-13193. I ;
i 1~. 4 "Arrhenius - Data for EPR, CSPE, and Chlorinated Polyethylene from ' Qualification of Power and Control-
)
Cable- for Class 1E Applications, ' by Anaconda," T. H. ,
Ling and W. F. Morrison. .I 1.5 " Report on Qualification Tests for Second Generation solid Dielectric Coaxial Constructions and Cellular Dielectric Coaxial Constructions for Class 1E Service in ;
Nuclear Generating Stations," Report No. 2806, 4/23/82. .l l 1.6 " Final Report On Zone Map Study For Carolina Power and Light Company's H. .B . Robinson -
Unit 2 Electric '
Generating Plant," Patel Engineers, Patel Report No. PEI-TR-831006-1, Rev. B (Ref. File 73). l' [
i 1.7 Engineering Evaluation ENG 88-132.
1.6 SMiD79-0924C, "A Study of Strong Synergisms in Polymer. !
Degradation", Clough, Gillen, & Salagar, Sandia National Laboratories. I 1.9 SAND 80-2149C, " Radiation - Thermal Degradation of PE and {
PVC's Mechanism of Synergisms and Dose Rate Effects," R. '
L. Clough & K. T. Gillen, Sandia National Laboratories.
l 1.10 SAND 80-1796C, " Occurrence and Implication of Radiation f Dose Rate Effects for Material Aging Studies," K. T. , l Gillen & R. L. Clough, Sandia National Laboratories. g-l 1.11 "NRC IE Bulletin 79-01B (90-Day Report) ," CP&L, Rev. 3, dated 2/1/81 (Ref. File 59). '
j 1.12 DOR Guidelines (Enclosure 4 to IEN 79-018).
1.13 " Containment Equipment Beta Evaluation, H. B. Robinson Unit 2," Patel Letter No. PEI-TL-89-26 (Ref. File.160).
l i
)
i i
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 4 of'40 j
, . , . , , ,. ,n_ y . - . - _ . - - ., y -
7..,_m, ,,-_,mrm.m . - n -----.s
u - _ . _ , . _ .
Section 1 (Cont.)
1.14 "LOCA Nuclear Qualification of FR-EPDM, cross-linked Polyolefin, and EPDM/Hypalon," National Technical Systems, NTS Report No. 558-1088, dated October 1981 (Ref. File 111). -1 1.15 " Qualification Test of Electric Cables Under Two MSLB Simulations by Sequential Exposure to Environments of
- Thermal Aging, Radiation, and Steam, a performed for Eaton Corp, (Samuel Moore Operations, Dekoron Div.), Isomedix, Inc., January 1980 (Ref. File 111).
M4-Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 5 of.'40 {
y - - ,
.. 1
.. h SECTION 2 l 2.0 EOUIPMENT LIST The following list contains information about all cables ;
that are qualified by this EQDP. The 3,gh column indicates with an "F" that the particular cable is submerged over' .i some portion of its length during events that cause !
Containment flooding. l l
l 4
i i
?
l
?
i i
I i
e 1
i t
f Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 6 of 40 l f I
- f rN4 4 A-4 T O e.
. , SECT!ON 2 EQDP 11.1 Cable List i l- l Cable Destination Destination Cable Purchase IR Number From to Type Cable Model Order Calculation Locat Sub l
.......... .................... .................... .......... .................... .......... ............ ..... ... l
" 1 PT 501 i i
C2455AF PT 501 SPLICE 2/C16s 1x52 68340 001 671814 CALC 89 007 CON F 1 1
" RC 551A i' C21358 RC 551A:Ja 173 SPLICE 2/C16s 1952 68310 HOR 01504B EQDP 7.0 CON l "
RC 5518 I i
C21350 RC 5518:JB 174 SPLICE 2/C165 1952 68310 Hen 015045 EQDP 7.0 CON l
" l RC 551C C2135F RC 551C:ss 175 SPLICE 2/C16S 1952 68310 MBR015048 EQDP 7.0- CON
" l RC 567 C2137A RC-567 SPL!CE 4/C16s 1x35 60433 002 HBR01365 EQDP 11.1 CON 1
RC 569 C213?B RC-569 SPLICE 4/C165 1X35 60433 002 MBR01365 EQDP 11.1 CON RC 571 I J
C2137C RC 571 $PLICE 4/C165 1X35-60433 002 Hea01365 EQDP 11.1 CON
{
RC 568
~21373 RC-565 SPLICE 4/C165 1X35-60433 002 MBR01365 EQDP 11.1 CON RC*570 C2137E RC 570 $PLICE 4/C16S 1X35 60433 002 Hea01365 EQDP 11.1 CON RC 572 C21377 RC 572 SPLICE 4/C165 1X35 60433 002 H8R01365 EQDP 11.1 CON
" ** FT-1425 C2658G FT 1425 RTGB:FIC 1425 2/C16s 1952-68310 MBR006TT EQDP 11.1 AUX FCV 1425 C265BE FCV 1425 AUX PNL CE 2/C165 1952 68310 HSR00677 EQDP 11.1 AUX FCv.1424 l C2657E FCV 1424 AUX PNL FD 2/C16s 1952 68310 Hea086TT EQDP 11.1 AUX FT 1424 C26570 FT 1424 RTG8:FIC 1424 2/C168 1952 68310 H84086TT EQDP 11.1 AUX i
i i
1 Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 7 of 40
y x _. . _ .-.
p
-SECTION 3 3.0 OUALIFICATION ANALYSIS 3.1 Oualifiestion Summarv 3.1.1 Discussica Qualification was accomplished by testing various Dekoron Instrumentation and Control cables utilizing either XLPO or EPDM insulation and Hypalon jacketing. The testing included thermal aging, radiation exposure and accident simulation. Additional testing was performed to qualify the cable for a submerged environment. Based on the -
comparison of the qualification test documentation to the normal and accident service conditions (including-submergence) postulated for containment, Dekoron Instrumentation and Control Cables possess a 40 year qualified life at HBR-2. The cables will perform their safety function during a subsequent DBE at the and of their qualified life. The qualification meets the requirements of NUREG-0588, Category I.
3.2 Oualification Recuirements 3.2.1 Normal Service Conditions Reference <
Temperature 120*F for 100% of life See Section 3.4.2 Radiation 1.1 x 10' rads gamma Ref. 1.6
, (air equivalent 40 years)
Cycling N/A cycles per year Voltage less than 30 VAC See Section 3.4.5 125 VDC
_ Current less than 1 A See Section 3.4.5 l
3.2.2 Desian Basis Events l
Source MSLB X Ref. 1.6 )
~
Operating Time 30 days Ref. 1.11 Radiation 1.5 x 10' rads gamma Ref. 1.6 2.0 x 10, rads beta See Section 3.4.9 Peak Temp. 265* F Re f. 1. 6, Fig. 1 l
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 8 of"40 l
s.
Y e
~*
3.2.2' 4 Desian Basis Events (Cont.). >
heference
' i Pressure 42 psig Ref 1.6, Fig. 2
- Relative Humidity ~ 100% Maximum Ref. 1.6 j'
- Submergence Yes X No Ref. 1.7 f Chenical Spray Yes _X._ No FSAR Section 6.1.1.2 3.2.3 Functional-Reauirements (Desian Basis Events)
The subject equipment must remain functional during and after a DBE.
Mode Active Passive X-4 Insulation See section 3.4.5 Resistance Circuit Yes Continuity 5
L k
i b
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 9 of:40 f
l :_ ,
In, L
e -
I
-g h
N
- g al
. u -
- - 3 m -
- .e
<uY
_n y egg l
t n a Cg I
u
==
ar e g
I t
e e i e
d
=. Ow g
l E E E E E E E O O SOn
- n e
a O
O n
g e.
g O 8 I I
O.
. - l Je 3MAAVW3dN34 ANENNIVANO3 i
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 10 of 40 I
i t
E
_t
. =
1 f
l 2 Ild a g
-I Ee- ~
. a 8
s
&I
~a l
=
eE t
l
~
o_d. ;.
l I I l i I I e .
2 3 23 3.
- 2 2 e.
sis 4-sunessu+ inanimivinos i
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page IL of 40
.p._
e 13.3 oualification Documentation Assessment
-3.3.1- oualification Documentation 3.3.1.1- " Qualification Test of Electric Cables Under A Simulated IDCA/DBE By Sequential Exposure .to Environments of.
Radiation, Thermal Aging,fSteam and Chemical Spray,"
Isomedix, Inc.', dated June 1978. (Ref. 1.1) 3.3.2 Anolicability of oualification Documentation and Similarity of Testad/ Installed Eauinment The equipment under evaluation, Dekoron I&C cable, was-manufactured by Samuel Moore and Company. Key features of the installed cable are as- follows . (See Section 8, Attachment 2):
- 4/C, 16 AWG, 7 strand tinned copper conductors, 25 mil cross-linked polyolefin (XLPO), 2 mil aluminum-mylar shield, 45 mil Hypalon jacket.
- 2/C, 16 AWG, 7 Strand tinned copper conductors, 20/10 mil EPDM/Hypalon insulator - conductor jacket, aluminum - mylar shield, 45 mil Hypalon
, jacket.
Materials of construction and. critical dimensions of.
tested cable, as given in Isomedix Report, dated June 1978 (Reference 1.1), confirms the similarity between .I.
tested and installed equipment. Isomedix tag numbers 2, 4, 5, 7, 13,.and 14 are considered representative of the cables qualified by this EQDP. The vendor has cited this -
- report specifically for qualification of cables purchased under P. O. 671814 (See Section 8, Attachment 3). In ;
addition, two other qualification test reports which address Samuel Moore (Eaton Corp.) cables'with XLP0 and EPDM insulation are contais.,d in this EQDP as supplemental qualification information (see References.
1.14 and 1.15). '
Therefore, the qualification documentation covers the cable under review.
ash.-
'Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 12'of"40
_ .1, ;
EL; !
-3.3.3 Dar cualification Analysis - l 1.- Are-all peak temperature, pressure,-
xn na j and humidity requirements enveloped . ~.
during the' transient phase? X ;
Temp. Peak 340*F
}
t Pres. . Peak 105 psig ;
R.H. 100%
Reference / Comments: See Figure 3, and Ref. 1.1, p. 2-3, 1 2-6. .i 1
\
- 2. Are all temperatures, pressure, and j time requirements enveloped during i the post-accident phase? X j t
Reference / Comments: See Section 3.4.3, and Ref. 1.1, p. l 2-6. '
i
- 3. Are margins as applied consistent with those defined in IEEE 323-1974, '{i and/or the DOR Guidelines, as applicable? X Margins: ?i No. of transients 2
. Frequency N/A voltage N/A l
Temperature +75'F at the peak
~
Pressure' 150% at the peak I Radiation greater than 100%
Accident Duration . greater than 100% j l
l Reference /Commehts: See Section 3.4.6, and Ref. '1.1, pp.
2-6.
- 4. Are the functional tests as l performed-adequate to demonstrate that the HBR-2 functional require-
~
monts (including accuracy)'for the equipment can be met? X Reference / comments: See Sec. 3. 4. 5, & Ref. 1.1, Table 2. lI
' l Rev.'1 EQDP 11.1, Page 13 of: 40 l i
4.- . !
h.
.' 3.3.3 DBE Oualification Analysis (Cont.) . . '!
%.RE' HSL !
\
- 5. Was the normal and accident i l' radiation applied prior to and/or. ;
simultaneously with the accident i simulation? If yes, to what level? X
[
t 2.0 x 10' rads gamma i Reference / Comments: See Ref. 1.1; pp. 2-1, 2-2, Table 1. l
- 6. If submergence is a requirement, does the test demonstrate- 1 acceptable operation? X F
Reference / Comments: See Section 3.4.7. i
- 7. Was the requirement for chemical !
spray enveloped? X l Reference / Comments: See Ref. 1.1, pp. 2-4, 2-6, and FSAR i Section 6.1.1.2 ,
3.3.4 Aoina Analysis !
Thermal
- 1. Does the aging analysis provided !
in the supporting documentation 1 justify a 40-year qualified life i
, at the defined service temperature?
Are self heating effects adequately addressed?' X i i
Reference /C. nts: See Section 3.4.2. !
- 2. Was t$a aging analysis performed !
using Arrhenius techniques? X j Reference /Co== ants: See Section.3.4.2. 7 i
/
3.
i Is the aging analysis auditable? X :
Rafarance/ Comments: See Section 3.4.2. l l t
- 4. If any thermal aging exemptions were j utilized, are they auditable? N/A N/A l Reference / Comments: No thermal aging exemptions were )
utilized. !
t i
f Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 14 of 40 l 6
i
m'
}p 1
. i
.i
, 13.3.4 Aoina' Analysis' (Cont.) l -l
-e
. =
g g 6 Radiation !
- 5. .Were gamma radiation. levels met -I during the radiation test? X j i Reference / Comments: See Ref. 1.1, pp. 2-1, 2-2, Table l. !
- 6. If any radiation exemptions'were I utilized are they auditable? N/A .N/A Reference / Comments: No radiation exemptions were ,
utilized.
l
- 7. Are Beta radiation effects !
addressed? X -l Reference / Comments: See'Section 3.4.9 Mechanical
- 8. Were the test specimens j mechanically aged? N/A 'N/A l Referenet/ Comments: These devices are passive in' design 'l (i.e.,- contain no ' moving parts). Therefore, no 1 mechanical aging was required.-
l 3.3.5 Test Procram Analysis l
- 1. Does the test sequence comply with l IEEE 323-1974? X i Reference / Comments: See Ref. 1.1, pp. 1-1,.2-1.
- 2. Are the acceptance / failure criteria ]
clearly defined? X j
~ ~ ' '
Rafarence/ Comments: See Ref. 1.1, p. 1-2.
- 3. If anomalies or failures occurred ;
during the test program, are adequate .l justifications provided such that- -j the qualification is not negated?- X Reference / Comments: See Section 3.4.8, and Ref.1.1, pp.
2-5, 5-1.
If
'l Rev. 1- EQDP 11.1, Page 15' of 40 l
o -
L=. Test Procram Analysis !
3.3.5. (Cont.) ,
M D i
- 4. Are all known synergisms accounted a for in'the test program? __JL_. l Reference / Comments: See Section 3.4.4. l S. Are special installation and/or maintenance requirements identified !
in the test program? X !
Reference / Comments: No maintenance is required. '
?
I
?
l 6
v 1
L e
b Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 16 of 40 l f
[
vvuouo a s==s. a r =c -a=
- i
.= smes=Yas.a.n am a: . I _iamias s.= 4.= s.,=._= i, s, s,..u, san
- u. u am na J masassa. u ,
amas m p i l v 3
.h,- ===
J unan t ==s l senssi- i
'l
,,,,n, ~
- "'" T 'i I gesmiens.-sms sense acss islsont an essam i n I, t==iemisaw
==== a=== =genesi surrsa s == seems 1
,,,,,,,,,,,,,I I I , l [ uernmumm j i i nernsmanm ,
talBEJ g
""'8"'"
lak'dI g i i
'""**^"
g I
l uce 1 I l.k humi I -
sern ,s q l l$ em 4 siE6m 1
j i I
( g g
l I
i
,,,,,,,g ie,ang g i g I q mannu lius.ri iun I I
asums I tuee l I
n"er'*sE' i g
33!
r.e.s.
i I f g
v.s.o. 1 34,.,
g
, u.u..su,, ,
, in u,,ser , suu s ai .
I
. i i i ser .
t-I t e I
, snus naus sea. sun. um. uma. . asas sess-nerna er er mass em sams: a. 4. s. v. s. e. u. u. u am u tasz 2 3 naca snesarses ranras n
e la assursos.essises, assup. -- r__ *=r '-- : e --nur g u se,- - .' "" ""'E """"' .L dhll'llNL **.h 8
'g 5****
[
I i i
8 7 l 8 8 a I
TesRE. L 33 fsees i
33 gg [
anunes , ,,,,, y . ;
SoAAS I ,,,. l 8 t i l I esmacna, spans sonne neus 'es 6 a sensusvasessarass I I passeness arrsans ways som asom e g g
' I
', I
- casacas. L t seus sms F l I
8 t
i e nem sacornsps3Sn000 l f I l e i , i = =n- ;.
3 I I tseernstsaaneet g t
! ( Me 6-raussumar g i g . i asursw I I -
seaman I tsesert m ezza 3 $ amassas 3 i e, usu g g
e i
I I I '
8 e
l Sea t I, , l
. l es asses' - I, I. se a. sums !
i .cr .. .
ass' ame Esas. 1 sus. 4 anse 34..easpr.
? aus Peeress er esse pouss:wsasesupu ass >ns.
ssa.Jas.saen sausassenbemuras.
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page- 17 of: 40 l
e $--mT w- g-p- --,--m, , ,
m-Oualification Justification Analysia ,
. 3.4 4
~
13.4.1 General when the analysis is performed blish Justification qualification documentation does This section not clearly esta are met. i that the plant analysis requirements to augment the qualification provides the documentation. the i
For the Dekoron following-areas Instrumentation and Control Cable were analyzed: ,
i l
3.4.2 Qualification Life calculation 3.4.3 Post-Accident 3.4.4 Known Synergistic Effects 3.4.5 Functional Analysis l' 3.4.6 Margin Evaluation 3.4.7 Submergence l 3.4.8 Anomalies Radiation Exposure Analysis I 3.4.9 l l
Oualified Life Calculation f
'3.4.2 R 2 is.
ill Dekoron Instrument and control Cable Therefore.the m utilized d not experience significant self heating. i '
qualified life calculation 1.6 willthis be temperature based on the is max mu '
normal ambient According to Ref. l exposed.
120*F. t ials !
To calculate qualified life, the non-metallic ma er The :
are assumed to follow as Arrhenius relationship. i imum of ;
2 equipment was aged prior to LOCA Since cabletesting for aismonly jacketing ni l 168 hours at 121*C. !
provided to prevent physical damage to cable i insulat on and does not in itself perform a safety-related funct on, the qualified life calculation will. be based on the For minimum activation energy of the cable insulation.
Dekoron IEC Cable this value is 1.31 eV for EPDN.
Q.L. = ti exp [(E,/kg) (1/T, - 1/T ) )
3 Where, Q.L. == qualified life t
=
aging time (hrs) = 168 hrs. activation energy (eV) =
E, k, = Boltzmann's constant (8.617x10= 121*C = 394K
=
T
=
aging temperature (*K) service temperature (*K) = 120 T,
l EQDP 11.1, Page 18 of 40 Rev. 1
. - - . .__ " ' " rg
^ ^
.o
.3.4.2 'Oualified Life Calculation '(Cont.)
Solving the equation provides an additional qualified ,
life of greater than 40 years.
3.4.3 Post-Accident Decradation Ecuivalency ;
For the subject equipment, the test temperature and pressure profile of Fig. 3 envelopes the postulated accident profiles,'shown in Fig. 1 & 2, for peak and duration. Per IEEE 323-1974, a 10% margin is required of
~
the period of time the equipment is required to be operational following the design basis event. Since the
- non-metallic, organic materials of construction are assumed to follow -an Arrhenius relationship, the requirements at one time and temperature can be transferred to another set of time-temperature conditions using the relationship:
ti = t, exp ( (E,/kg) (1/Ti -1/T,) ]
where, ti = equivalent time at T (hours) i Ti = reference temperature (K) t, = time at temperature T, (hours) ,
T, = accident temperature (K)
E, = activation energy (eV) 4 kg = Boltzmann's Constant (8.617x10 eV/K) ;
i A time-temperature equivalency can be performed to verify l that the test conditions, plus 10% margin, exceed the l plant postulated post-accident phase by using the !
following parameters:
Ti = 152*F
- tr = 624 hrs T = 200*F E, = 1. 31 eV -
By solving the equation, the equivalent time at T, is 676 including days which . exceeds the HBR-2 requirements, based on the analysis l
required margin. Therefore, presented above, the device is qualified for the postulated accident and post-accident phases. Note that-this margin does not include the additional 70 days of 1.1, post-LOCA testing performed by Samuel Moore (Ref.
Addendum).
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 19 ofb 40
g .w, -
~
-+.
E '3.4.4: ' Known Svnercristic Effects l
Two known synergisms (Regulatory Guide 1.89, Paragraph g
C.5.a) have been noted for polymers such-as EPR,.XLPO, !
p Chloroprene, CSPE, PE and PVC. . The device contains EPR,--
XLPO, ; and .CSPE and/or similar polymers. One of these synergisms, does_ rate offacts, was-not addressed during
-the test. i A complete explanation- of these known potential 4 synergisms is.provided in References 1.8, 1.9, and 1.10. l The intent of the research documented in References 1.8,- l
.1.9, and 1.10 was.to highlight potential aging problem l 1 areas between . real-time and: artificially accelerated ' ~l radiation aging and the sequence of radiation' testing.- l For Class 1E. equipment located in harsh environments, .l
. qualification: testing to the postulated normal' and 'l accident radiation levels may not degrade the equipment j to . a ' level which -is indicative of actual degradation- l experienced in its proposed service life. ;
I
~
Performing qualification testing at levels in excess of j i
the required level is a common method to account for this synergistic effect. This device was radiation aged to a (
level 12.4 times (greater than 100% above) 'the requirement. Therefore, it is judged this device wasi i
degraded-to a level much greater than would be seen.in -i service and therefore.no~ surveillance program would be required. )
l 3.4.5 Functional Analysis I The equipment is required to function during and after a DBE. As can be seen in Ref. 1.1 (Table 2), testing on samples 2, 4, 5, 7, 13 and 14, which are similar to those .)
cables installed at HBR-2, indicate insulation resistance I readings at temperatures of 300*F or less on 35 ft.-
samples as follows:
sample 2 - 8.47 x 1[ ohms Sample 4 - 1. 6 x 10, ohms sample 5 - 2.9 x 10 ohms sample 7 - see sect sample 13 - 2.0 x 10[on 3.4.8 Sample 14 - 4.6 x 10, ohms ohms Test data contained in the supplemental qualification reports (References 1.14 and 1.15) shows that the Dekoron cables with EPDM or XLP0 insulation successfully completed testing of their electrical functions following exposure to' a DBE. The Isomedix report in Reference l.15 describes testing of 3 XLP0 and 5 ' EPDM samples (each !
approx. 10 feet long). The samples were aged for 7 days- -l at 150*C, and then aged again for 7 days at 121*C,136*C, _ -!
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 20 of'40
.a..-. .
~
o 3.4.5 Functional Analysis (Cont.)
or 150
- C (see Ref 1.15, p. 2-1) . They were exposed to 25 Mrad and rhen tested under MSLB conditions: 430
- F and 29 psig for 95 seconds with a cooldown to 210*F and 10 psig.
The samples were then immersed in water and subjected to .
AC voltage withstand tests for 1 and then 5 minutes. A longer MSLB simulation was then conducted (10 days vs.
1000 seconds), and another immersion / withstand test was ,
run. The samples were subjected to 600 volts (AC) and O.5 amps for the testing (the 5 min. immersion / withstand test was done at 80 volts / mil AC). Ngne of the samples showed an IR value less than 1.0 x 10 ohms or a current :
leakage larger than 0.6 mA during the LOCA/ immersion testing. The NTS report in Reference 1.14 describes testing of 3 EPDM and 1 XLPO specimens (each approx. 15 ft. long). The aging and radiation exposure for this test was more severe than the previously described t Isomedix report: 164*C aging for 168 or, 220 hours0.00255 days <br />0.0611 hours <br />3.637566e-4 weeks <br />8.371e-5 months <br />; followed by radiation exposure to 2.0 x 10 rads. The electrical loading during the tests was 600V ( AC) and 0.5 amps. The NTS LOCA testing lasted 100 days with a peak at 375'F and 70 psig (with chem. spray). The immersion withstand tests were identical to the Isomedix reports.
- The test results were similar to the previously described test: .the IR values measured during the LOCA test dipped as low as 2.,9 x 10' ohms (except for one erratic reading at 2.8 x 10 ) , and there was no current leakage during the withstand test. Therefore, it may be concluded that the Dekoron cables with XLPO or EPDM insulation have demonstrated that they will perform their safety function while in the worst case environmental conditions at HBR-
- 2. ,
3.4.6 Marcin Evaluation ]
The test cables were energized with a potential of 600V during LOCA testing (Ref. 1.1, p. 1-1). Additionally, i the cables were subjected to high potential testing (80V/ mil) during post-LOCA testing. Cable is unaffected by minor changes in frequency ' as it merely conducts whatever value is applied. Therefore, the intent of the i 323-1974 margin is satisfied. !
l 3.4.7 Su>mercance As a result of Engineering Evaluation ENG 88-132 (Ref.
1.7) it was determined that Dekoron Instrumentation and Control cable may be submerged during a LOCA at various containment locations. Although testing performed in Ref. 1.1 included periodic functional testing while l submerged, it does not conclusively show long-tern-qualification of the cables for submergence. 'Therefore, Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 21.of:40 'l 1
,a,.~
s:.
13'.4'.7' ' Submarcance (Cont.)
the submergence 1 data found in Ref. 1.2 is presented as supplemental test'information to show Dekoron IEC cables-with - XLPO and EPDM insulation will perform adequately-under submerged conditions.
The testing was f performed in 90'C water for 52 weeks.
Haasurements of SIC (Specific - Inductive Capacity) at.
00V/ mil-were made every two weeks. The samples tested
- dere 16'AWG, 7 strand tinned copper with 25 mils of insulation.
EPDM demonstrated an initial SIC value of 2. 6 ~which ~
gradually increased to 3.1 over the one year period.
Over the _ initial 30 day period SIC increased to 2.8 -
representing an increase of 7.7%. The Power . Factor-measured at 80V/ mil during this same period initially was a value- of 1.3 which increased until week 4 then gradually decreased until week _24 and began a slight increase ;atil it reached the final value of 1.8. After the initial 30 days the Power Factor was only'1.45 representing an increase of 11.5%.
XLPO demonstrated similar submerged electrical properties as EPDM. SIC increased from an initial 3.0 to. 3.1 by the
~
and of.the_ initial 30 days and was only 3.4 by-year end.
Power Factor measured.'at 80V/ mil initially was 1.3-and reached only 1.6 by the end'of the initial 30 days. The Power Factor peaked at 2.9 by week 11 and then gradually decreased to 2.0 by.the end of the 52 week test.- i
, - The electrical _ stability demonstrated during the above- f testing indicates.Dekoron XLPO and EPDM insulated cables l are suitable for long-term use in submerged locations. l Therefore, based on this testing in conjunction with the ;
IDCA testing documentation in Ref. 1.1 (along with the j excellent results demonstrated in the immersion / withstand I tests in References 1.14 and 1.15), it can be concluded- .!
the Dekoron EPDM and XLPO insulated cable installed at- !
_, HBR-2 will perform its intended function during the 30 i day post-accident period. !
I i
Anomalies
~
3.4.8 i Sample 7 completed the LOCA simulation but was de-energized early during the simulation due to shorting.of l the - . cable. cona actors to ground. This anomaly was !
attributed to the means of sealing and securing of the I cables where they passed through.the penetrations in the i pressure vessel. The sample successfully completed post- !
exposure a.c.'high potential withstand tests for 1 minute at' rated a.c. voltage, 1 minute at twice rated . a.c. i voltage and 5 minutes at 80VAC/ mil. Therefore,' cable Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 22 of 40 }
I
~
p__
c 5 '3 . 4 . 8' - Anomalles ~ (Cont. )'
sample 7 is considered to have successfully completed the IDCA simulation. The anomaly plant was a result of test setup installation and and not representativt- of therefore has no effeet on qualification.
3.4.9 Radiation Excesure Analysis The test samples were exposed to 2.0 x '10'~ rads gamma by Isomedix (see Reference 1.1, Table I) . The maximum gamma j dopo at MBR-2 (inside containment) is specified as 1.5 x 10 rads. The beta dose is specified as 2.0 x 10, rads (Ref.1.13) ; however, NUREG-0588 - (Section 1.4 (9)) allows the crediting of a 50% reduction -in the beta dose because .
these cables are contained'in conduit and cable trays.
Furthermore, the Dekoron cable at NBR-2 (see has Section a 2-mil
. 8, shield and a 45-mil Hypalon jacket Attachment 2), which will serve to reduce the beta dose more (the DDR the individual conductors even to j Guidelines, Section 1.4, allow a factor of ten Therefore, reduction for the first 30 mils of jacket thickness).
the specified beta dose at HBR-2 for.the Dekor,on cables under evaluation will be listed as 1.0 x 10 -rads (a f actor of 10 - reduction divided by 2) , and the Isomedix radiation-exposure is judged sufficient to qualify the Dekoron cable for the postulated radiation exposure..
EQDP-11.1, Page 23 of.40 l Rev. 1
V . -. :._
SECTIOR._i i l
' ' 4, 0_ AGING DATA BASE MATRIX h Dekoron XLPO No essential subcomponent/ material of t ed Control Cable has based on a normal g
and EPDM insulated Instrumentation ana qualified life of
! service temperature of 120*F.
l' j
l l
I, l
l l
i l
I I
j EQDP 11 1, Page 24 of-40 Rev. 1
W :.;a,,, z--.,.~ ;
l SECTION 5 5.0 NRC IE BULLETINS / NOTICES / CIRCULARS .
i a
No IE Bulletins / Notices / Circulars were identified to'be applicable to. Samuel Moore (Dekoren) . ' Cables -i i
n i
i
~;
l t
F Md j l
.1
-l 4
I i
1 Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 25 'of 40 l 1
-~;. - . - - , . . . . . . _ . _ , _ _ _
e -
w-_ ;_..
f
' , e SECTION 6 6.0 _ MAINTENANCE REOUIRED TO MAINTAIN -
ENVIRONMENTAL /OUALIFICATION Device Tag: N/A {
Manufacturer /Model/ Serial Number: Samuel Moore (Dekoron)/ Instrument Cable /NA t
Location: Various ;
i EQ Maintenance Requirements: None -
Replacement Model: N/A Spare Components: N/A Qualification Level: NUREG-0588, Category I ,
t
~!
i i
t I
1 4
l 1
I i
)
4 l
I Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 26 of 40 l'
~
_ _ .I
97;.
- 4 m
Y .c l
i
- ' SECTION-7 ;
7.O OUALIFICATION TEST ~ REPORTS
- 7.1 Test reports referenced in this document may be found in_the CP&L EQ Reference File'. [
P i
I b
i i
b i
e i I
f 1
i t
~* .,
t
.1 i
l a
l 1
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 27 of 40 'I l
J
]
- g. . , _ _ , . . . ~ ~ 1 I
- .? \
- l s..
SECTION 8 j.~
Section Attachment Descriotion l 8- 1 Letter, Mark A. Tabbey (Samuel Moore) to I Michael D. Thomas (Impell/CP&L) w/ Enclosures, dated 2/24/89.
8 2 Samuel Moore Operations (Dekoron Division), Certificate of Compliance, D-3110, Sales Order E-32818, dated 8/7/80.
8 3 Letter, Mark A. Tabbey (Samuel Moore) to l~
Gary Elam (Patel), dated 9/14/87.
i f
F i
r i
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 28 of;40 l t
- I Attachm:nt 1 Section 8 I
' Page 1 of 7 SECTION 8.1 Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 29 of 40
Attachmont 1 Section 8 i Page 2 of 7 FL1JOSN3CAmmON
- o. -<i..o -..i,. .o-..,~..,,,
Samuel Macu~e Gr'oup Tabruary 24, 1989 !
Carolina Power and Light 333 Research Court - Technology Park i Norcross, GA 30092 Attention: Mr. Micheal Thomas Subjects Dekoron Long Tara Moisture Data XLPO & TR-EPDM
Dear Mr. Thomas:
Per our conversation, I have enclosed long term electroendosmosis data for our XLPO and TR-EPDM 0 water.
insulations. The testing duration was for 52 weeks in 90 C Measurements of SIC at 80 volts / mil and power factor at both 40 and 80 volts / mil were made every 2 weeks. The samples tested were 16 AWG, 7 strand tinned copper with 25 mils of insulation.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
- Sincerely, N
Mark A. Tabbey Product Development Manager '
Wire & Cable
/kis 1
-. j M1199 S. Chmh* Road
- Aurora, Ohio 44202
- 1-216/562-9111
- FAX 1216 562-8440 Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 30 of.40
ji I
I' n u.anmano n
- Sem%
E-aetMoor,gno,s.me siessewn cnieceni. es no.e o,,,,,,
Ref. No.
Started -was Metecles Lot No.
en-arose ID/OD .see s.no Beth Temp. ee c p,[3e,e,,, we tan % i o,*, s ooo sez seu EM-60 Lot No. 40 Volts /mit i 2e !
O'ame oe*,i soo ser sis: ,
t.e seous Osmosis .e w. S Conet. as -a 80 Molts /mII maee Realn Mfg. maross Color snare Withstand Tested By Wire Goge ,sawom , IIITest Voltage
'lij u;, T '; ,';. ; . . ..'. . iW., . 1 ;.. .
, 4i .,o ...
- .s . t ,r;;y ;;;1,;7;.4ppp., ;, g; , ,;4;,g; i
u r e .r ..r. .. . ' so .pm...;;p .u a il .o...: % , .iin, nn n '.,, ym,,g u ,,
. .w , nn .
l nio ano . ' - - , -
i n , i, u y :,
lihl@Hl' ': '
- . hd. !>- i , .;il tL i:. ;. . i ; ) :.HplHullp;ngn pp ung,,,nhHHlhHgqhhHnWHgj h hMMhH jjijl
- liilli!!;Hiiln
.y Mj h" . , ( . 7- ,Jn,'1,nL,j;!niniu,:!;ioli:hijHb!H;;idi;;;!!;dhill!ijnlij
. T1'. ;:.
p'M}qf J,,;@gyglpyHg g l!!!jll!Hillijjjjij!!!!iiijlill ((!j!!jil hlHain., n m 1 e,: >: . ;:.L L - d ,: w M .! Hili,UhlH UilHHil;HHhn;nngin' y H l HlH llHUiHilni!iE!: DihnHhiW:nn!nn!ninnh!!!!dd!!UH!hHnHhhiihdi!lHUill Hj lilil'jHijn!!!lHlijlll ~l H Hl j8!ijiiiln!!!:iijI::::n::n.iHiH i"=""j n:nnn:::::::::n HiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiipiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiHiiiiiil n::::n:::n:::: :n:::::::nr nil,jI ii:ina: 2p iii n: j,3;ils j ng i.in.::"P:::::n l'lI ,,: ,,,r: a, n,,, ::::::n : n :::::::n ,,,,n.. a,
- n. ,:n ::: n:::: n n ,,, ;;;;;;; H'j:n::: n,,: n,,::!::itn:::::n a e 3r
- n,
, . ,I,t . ,il, . . , o.
a
, lnnnl n u: lu, h,, , nnunn:
. . g . , ,l. .;I: n, ,, U, n n n n n t h,Il u, , n ,., n, , . . . ,
n , n ) m, a. o ,i ,. , o . ,, , , , ,j ,,,j , , h,:, h n. , h,l s ; n n
,i:.,no p .an,g ngsp.gia , .n,,
ang, ,,n,nn ,,n
=
to. . i i.:. . i. .i. . .- . ,. . - ,
, n v .y - r . .
. r .n n,.: o n o r nm.wnia .r wwhen:nhn hhnHHH mla:an oil n:,.m n, g tm f ,
- umninn o,a Uhmmonin Aounnannnu!nmMininiHHHU!nliH!H!illHlillill -
.. ,o i n ,, s ,4 l LP g l ns n q, lillii) #
J
,s .6 ,,, l...
jit .!,- .i , .' - .il. : ,..l il t ,si!i
! p i . j n . , s e ,i. i p o n p dpn i n. .t o ,
M it,' .
e n hm'l; 1,N HnhhamHHUU OH ililil ,
.'i ,
o o n e o i.' m >
!@8 ddh.hhMonnnm : Ahhnn==~nnnn A minhHHililii!!ui!!Hiii!lHiiihlip tilU lili '
i i
H ilIj"a;p:pl?ini!inifi"!Fiii!!!!!VH'H!:"ijiHiHiiHiiiHiiiiiii'!!iiiiiiHiiiiiHiiniijiiiija"!!"!!
- """"""":"""!""""""! l l :
jii'l"ili"liillljilinin,1 "c:i yl e ,e "d
""":, !!!iH"i.!":!!!:iiniiin=
HHH!,pn:. ,,;,,;::
3"n:!j!'innhn P
n!.H.2 ilinnstruinimiummml:nnualii!:n!!!Pliii:iiii u "um! i.!i :l
. onsrHuis l ,[ min l111 ll h.!immillin r , :miml: ! Hr :nn:nnn:n:nnn:nn:r , , .
,a ,n.m o, m
3i m,u,m o,oen = ,::,;..c , a ,.:c. ,1.n,y- : ,....no,c ,,
m ~o
= 1,w:.. % m ,,MoWnn'UH Hiunl
": a.moanomnmannonnuennnn
+=nnnon.ivomnnnoiml unlm msnniluu m nn ;
mm>
onuahmonomo monunnennaw.m ownr o m -
j@N ru;':.+: .- - : a th: 'iH 4 : W ';:i':!e p u H iHj H H Hl H H H ij H ;
! $ce usiai..U eq: : pl: "'. . .!
p: h:
l e g, g W W!1'L f -
- NMl% "M "gg~
l j
g O
llHHHjlH;HHj]lHHHHHHHjHHHHHHHH!HH!HHHHH!HlH llll M lhh4 3 ', t M U S M %
ill,i..,F.!..
llpi,:l!ldhlil!lIl!'!MOhi
- .! ( .;l,,;i.
- ildliM ::::.l l!!! !!!!l !! !li:Illn8!lli:l'!I!
- .t-
-[~ : ,- l',i!ji) k !!'I'!!!!! inh!!ONN Nll il!;tif, !Mjhf I
hjij f I h
h.I i
0
""h go
- 4 4
. l l H y W E:n:n: U. H nHnn H :ngn " p. u!. n== .! !! .i!==, i h n. H . H H nn H i s n.nn h i nahn=, ! U. .! .n H :, ,H. ..::
h ! g! p. : y $. 3 n. , p.c.! ! .H H U. .h i i !! H~i i .n h l h,,l, n.b, I llllll11I!!llllllllllllllllllllllllll l llll yi !, !!!!!!!lllllllII, l ll, llIII '
IIIl,,l, i
, . ,, .. .. .e.... ..
TI.e-Weeks
- P ,
.9 4, . ,< ,;, 41 a . . , ., , q lN'.
R l l g.,
. I g
., gm , xd
[ 3S_ .
.O
. .a E, .,,8
. ~.2 1 g
.s mmSh, e ,, ,0&
gLT-
> ,,.m. ,
>g % saW_ w ge a0& m e ,,,,)- .2
, ea.# . - ,
D. gG .I Sw. 8 asRq
. Wq u4 p. .geoe3" e
Sh *e e
ee n i .
. .. ....... 9
._._.,. ._...... . .. .... . ....._.. . ._.~_ .. . . . ._._. . _.
. .. ....... . _ .... . .... ..A..
.. ....__..._.n_._....
....._ _... . . . __- 2_..._
. ~.. .. . .. _..__.
. . - . . . . . ~ . . . .
e m.
...... e.
.. s a
I 9 J . - .. .. . .. . .
o .._ .
.. ...~.
g -
o . . . .. . . . _
o -_....
.... _.........+_.. _. ._.. . . . . ..... . ... .. . . .
d .
s .. ..
o ... . . _ . . . . ..
Em Qe
..,. . ..... . .... .._ . .. _.._.. .. ._ .......=.. ........ _._ _ . . ..__ . . . . . . . . . _ . . . _ _ . ~ _
Dd
.. ... .._... . . . . . .. .. _...... _ , .. .. .. .. .. ... . .. ....... . . . ..... . _ . . _ . _ . . . ...._.._............._._...F
. . ~ . .. .................. . . .. ..... ._ ....
P .._
5 _ _ ,... . .
. . . o. . . . .
1 _._ .... .
19
,.. ..=
0 ... _..
._..,....._........__.._........,............~........_.......__........._.....
,1 4 ..._.. .. . . . . _ ...s..._. _.
. ..._..._ ._.. _.=.
,. o _
1 S .. _ . .
... _. . _ . .,. . ._.. . . .... . . . .. . .. ____ _ ... ._._.._.._ e...___.____._ _.__.
P
. .. . aet a . . ..
gct g
eta
.. .._ ..m_._._-
... . . ..4. . .
4.,
- e. . . ..
a _ . _ _ _ _..........._..................._.__....___.._.._..
._._ ic
. 4oh 3 . .._. ..____._.
.,__. . .._. .._.. ._. _. ._. ... .. _ nm
.. .. .._./_.___
2 . _
o e
._ f8n o .... ... . ...._. ... ...... ..-.. ......... ..._.... .._._....._.
._-,,.__._ . . . .. .. ._. , -a- .. ... ... t
~.
......_.... ..... .. .. 7 f.
_._._. _ __.._. _ .. .... _.... ........... ......... ...... .. .... ....... ._.. . ..._. 1
.. _ w_._.._.____..................
4
_........ .. g 3 ....._..
. 0 . ..
. ......_ .._......................_... _. ...- -.=
......_................__.....__..~~__.._.__..._...
___ _. ...... ... ~._ . .....
,.. ......... ............ ... ._ ...~. _... . . ._ .-_.. .._.. ..._._.
- a g 3 3 gm I I 38 3 i.
l g
t: li ,. 1 l,l. I l {,, i li , ,. l
- - - ~
l r- :. -
Atte. chm 3nt 1 gectioh 8 Page 5 of 7 PLucapacAABSON
,,, ........=..,... .. ...~ .. ,
SamuelMoore Group l Tebruary 24, 1989 l l
Carolina Power and Light 333 Research Court - Technology Park Norcross, GA 30092 Attention: Mr. Micheal Thomas subjects Dekoren I.cng Tara Moisture Data j XLp0 & TR-EPDM i
Dear Mr. Thomas:
i Per our conversation, I have encioned long tera electroendoenesis I data for our XLPo and TR-EPDM insulations. The testing duration was for 52 weeks in Sc*C water. Measurements of SIC at so !
j volts / mil and power factor at both 40 and 80 volts / mil were made ;
every 2 weeks. The samples tested were is AWG, 7 strand tinned copper with 25 mils of insulation.
If you have any further questions, please contact me.
Sincerely, r jw '
Mark A. Tabbey Product Development Manager Wire & Cable
/kis l
l l
-. l l
M1199 3. Chillicothe Road e Aurora. Ohb mm . i.u mss.oi n . ****-< --
Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 3'3 of 40 l
i i
~
. % , t.d in = . . v.,,,, ' " . -
- r ,_ . , , ,,,, em-so t e no. 4 awn.i . -
1"*,2,%****,m Ossnesis .*J%[ ,Const. as a 80h,es/ssist :=
I
- - ResanMig. aavone Color einte gg,gestasief g t c. .t i
- i a ,
1 g . .
. .a J .
e i
i
- g. '
- ni t F 1 1!!
i -
iBH
- : , . egg ,
O (D i O
. . W . a' 75 ua - >
. . . . _ . - ._.-.-. ..c . . ... .
d
Attachment 1 Section 8
- .. . .. . Page 7 of 7- i
_ ._E....... . e.. .. . . . . . . . . . - . .
, l ll .l . l
_-___g.___
-=-
- )
I. .
l' dJi 's . . --
1 '.t, _i. hs l8,s.1 Ja -
!Ele.)9is - T , 3 6
;e E = 1.
z- - i n 6 6
= 8
.: t. I
=
g eL.l
.4 ea r - - -
als'g.e---.i : s i .s= J. . =g j ; a - ~ ._ , n . m, .
.i el p3 , -
- # t d
- 4..2 s '"
, 25 i ;_:;- .
-4
~ -. =, --a , . {,
.g ,
s.ms n. g
.tz
..,E ,e
. =.-- : -
=_
a :
.c - -. ~~ . . .
-l gg
% -w e -l
_ p ! ** r - . 5
.= n b g
- -- =_ __-
- =g a y g; g 1
~;
ga g
;; s -- : -
..a -
gd4 }a,1 I.
= -
, - , g =- __-, g j,;j,i, 8 8 1
=---
i i 1!- -e g Ie
=
n_ - 1
=
+= .
py.. -
=_-_ ,
1 - 3- ; g i g..... . g8v. ' mm aws, e ms l 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 35 of 40 ! l
p. 9 Attachinant 2 Section 8 Page 1 of 3 SECTIOff 8.2 t k e t b M0 l i i l l i 1 Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 36 cf 40 l
_ . - . . - ._ ~ % @ mis s .a L'% Attachmant 2 -- l
. Section 8 Page 2 of 3 i
y,_,, _ _ , . _ d L LIdm - _. i-__'.- _ _u
. .-- ....--- ..- oo _
,.=
sAnutL nocat c,tnAT,0N5 OEKORON DI, VISION . QUALITY ASSURANCE OEPARTMENT g AURORA, OH'O 44202 CERTIFICATE OF COMPl. LANCE 6M.auuA (butt. . ugett "' " ' p . J//o H 6 f.06 N5cN $TEApl PLANT
. Plus f.504E 16- C.. w oe.w N.._ N Af *0 fWE agg,mg 34 pg
- hTTwa 61.J- Sucg g s.l.. O .w N.. E 888/R r.e.ii........,,.......,.....,,,...,,,....,,,..,,,,,..,,,.....,,3,,......,,,,,
- c. .
1*= *. cosa w o. s A.,u u.so.wi i6 i.i I:? 6.3to M. IM5-Wl33-002 383
+co 1 4 e 71s 3 a 6- w .a N
(,t2Et!tatw.OG99'MA oa wi.is Mi .CO.- uo') reta.,as mu neo . a,,o. ,
#aw %rne SWirAD
- s .c n e n e.a.s e a. s mu.
- - W OLE M1 o Ai.ord *.3 5.T.
?
'O
$ gM o-v- ko g *I)mb U ]
3 4,. i e yov- to l
, 1
- 'A ~
,- & s
%n l y;g. QUALlTY ASSURANCE TECHNIC lJul
, ,,,... ...... ~ , . ..
............,~,.,...o....~-...
... ,m.. ...-- l MTE OF OMIO g;, e JNTY OF PORTr.GI ' _
)
Ti QUALITY ASSURAllCE SutERVl50R l e above Do. A. Surkhol.or signed this is .r presence on this g day of (fl.an.nl/~. 1 es.4,d/ - 1s.t. k ;
... e m Jeann( Jy. PIscella.' Notary Publ3c ;
R e v . 1 .... .. .. .. .. .. ... . . EQDP 11.1, Page 37 of 40 l l
F'
~~'
I- .. Attachmsnt 2 Section 8 Page 3 of 3 h .
.. N ,
- &* :s h
;,( g c ac . . i . .
.......;a?.-* .
a .a ; ; 4.. .:
. a* . . - * * * ;; . .' *. " 1
. th .@ N EL W LihMT *
-- .*.a** 1 . D /
,f.M8 f.o6 oseo s s,. PtaoY h 06. R.itHMt. Aoan . , ,_ ,,... ,,, s , , g . ,,g , p g 4 Af.T5olu.t., S. C. 29 5to 5 *" 4 * " " '*
- NE
. M7 4' L A R,Ag una.iuq h'.-...i.......a.............:..........o........mu.....w..
Cee.essie.
' "
- c .. . = o.......... , , , , ,,
D OC St Msa- 483 o TEEE-583
, , QCModt04 1/g g
~
' N M M *
- N49CO '> IW M *}% Tfgg 4 20-ia reiman.3,iwaw ei H5 T/c,i,4, gr.u u;g, Ati.am %c s wis LO ,'
45 mtb BLK-H3 F ALopJ OACMt.T
- COTT
,g s f
e Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 38.of 40 f e -9e+*o- .e.. . . = , , , - s. -->es . ...e em , _ = = , , . = _ - + , , . _ _ - - - _- - *
- t- -
o 4 AttOchm;nt 3 - Section 8 Page 1 of 2 SECTION 8.3 4 Rev. 1 EQDP 11.1, Page 39 of 40
ca.s 2._ ,
. : Attachmsnt 3
~~' ' . . ~ .*.
Section 8 , , , Page 2 of 2 WLUCMCCAMRON O F W O sa o u 5 FL&Tro.syperg a. . SamuelMoor~e Group September 14, 1987 Mr. Gary Elam patel Engineering 3400 Blue S Huntsville,pring Road AL 35810 *
Subject:
Carolina Power & Light Purchase Order 671814
Dear Mr. Elam:
Under 68340 001. the above purchase order, Dekoron supplied part number 1X52-testing it: 1978This product type was exposed to design basis event at Isomedix. The actual a are datatisd in Isomedix report entitled "ging, exposureTest qualification and of results Environments of Radiation, Thermal Aging, and Chem dated June, l$78. In the report a number of different cables were tested. that is applichle to the subject purchase order is identified asThe sarple
!somedix Tag No. 5, conductors 9 and 10.
The LOCA report is being sent to you and should arrive on 9 15 87. I If there is any additional information required, please do not hesitate to caontact me at.216 562-3802. 31ncerely.
'p /'. (/ I:1 d' ' /
Mark A. Tabbey Product Development Manager Wire and Cable Products * *
/bk .
. g,y, y EQDP 11.1, Page 40 of.40 gyggMF.- M'4 * * *
, e==s s-*"=8* * * " *}}