ML20003A601

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:16, 30 January 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Advises That Licensee Has No Objection to NRC 810116 Proposal Re Util Request for Hearing Re 801024 Order for Mod of License.Request Will Be Held in Abeyance,Pending Issuance of Safety Evaluations
ML20003A601
Person / Time
Site: Arkansas Nuclear  Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 01/30/1981
From: Reynolds N
DEBEVOISE & LIBERMAN
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
1-011-28, 1-11-28, 2-011-28, NUDOCS 8102040366
Download: ML20003A601 (1)


Text

LAW orrtCES OF DEB EVOIS E & LIBERMAN 1200 S EVENTE ENTH STR E ET. N. W WASHINGTON, D C. 20036 1-011-28 -

2-011-28 January 30, 1981 Mr. Darrell G. Eisenhut Director, Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Re: Arkansas Nuclear One - Units Nos. 1 and 2 Docket Nos. 50-313 and 50-368 Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment

Dear Mr. Eisenhut:

By letter dated January 16, 1981, you stated your intent to hold in abeyance the request for hearing by Arkansas Power & Light Company regarding the October 24, 1980 " Order for Modification of License" concerning environ- ,

mental qualification for Arkansas Nuclear One, Units Nos. 1 and 2 until 30 days after issuance of the safety evaluations for ANO. You proposed to permit AP&L within that 30-day period to advise you whether it will pursue its request for hearing, and if so, "what issues raised by the October 24, 1980 Order and the safety evaluation [AP&L wishes] to raias."

You then sought an indication from AP&L as to whether this procedure is acceptable to it.

This will advise you that AP&L has no objection to your proposal to hold the AP&L request for hearing in abeyance

pending issuance of the safety evaluations for ANO. Based upon our interpretation of your proposal, we believe that AP&L in accepting it does not waive the right to raise any issue which could have been raised in the first instance.

Specifically, we reserve the right to request a hearing on both the specific issues raised in the forthcoming safety evaluations and the more general issues raised by the October 24 Order. 4 Sincer 1 ,

f

-: i g };* bk

~- -

Nichola s Reynolds (

Couns !f Arkansas Power 90 l cc: Mr. S. M. Schinki i

1 02040 3hG6

. .- . - , . .. .-.