ML19323D052
| ML19323D052 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Davis Besse  |
| Issue date: | 07/09/1979 |
| From: | TOLEDO EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19323D048 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8005190585 | |
| Download: ML19323D052 (65) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:, .' 8005190585 O DIRECTIONS FOR INSERTING SUPPLEMENT 1 0F THE SEISMIC REEVALUATION REPORT During insertion of the revised pages, a dash (-) in the remove or insert column of the directions means no action is required. REMOVE . INSERT TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures (Cont'd) List of Figures (Cont'd) II-26B through II-29C II-268 through II-34C SECTION I I-3 I-3 SECTION II Table II-2 (Continued) Table II-2 (Continued) Sheet 3/ Sheet 4 Sheet 3/ Sheet 4 FIGURES
-
Figure II-30A
-
Figure II-308
-
Figure II-30C
-
Figure II-31A
-
Figure II-31B
-
Figure II-31C
-
Figure II-32A
-
Figure II-328
-
Figure II-32C
-
Figure II-33A
-
Figure II-33B
-
Figure II-33C
-
Figure II-34A
-
Figure II-348
-
Figure II-34C SECTION VI VI-1/VI-2 VI-1/VI-2 VI-3/VI-4 VI-3/VI-4
-
VI-5/VI-6
-
VI-7/VI-8
-
VI-9
- TABLES Table VI-1/ Table VI-1 (Continued) Table VI-1/ Table VI-1 (Continued)
-
Table VI-1 (Continued) (Component 24)
. . _ . . .. . -
- - - -
.
'
.
REMOVE INSERT DATA SHEETS
-
Data Sheet 1 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Shef t 2 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
, -
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 3 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3 '
-
Sheet 3 of 3 l
-
Data Sheet 4 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 5 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 6 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 9 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 10 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 11 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 12 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 21 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 22 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 2
-
Sheet 3 of 3
-
Data Sheet 23 Sheet 1 of 3
-
Sheet 2 of 3
-
Sheet 3 of 3 SECTION VII VII-1 VII-1/VII-2 TABLE
-
Table VII-1 l l i ,
-
,
1 l
'
. l LIST OF FIGURES (CONT'D) II - 268 Cont. Vessel Elevation 609.00 Vertical Floor Response Spectra II - 27A Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 585.00 NS Floor Response Spectra II - 27B Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 585.00 EW Floor Response Spectra II - 27C Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 585.00 VT Floor Response Spectra II - 28A Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 603.00 NS Floor Response Spectra II - 28B Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 603.00 EW Floor Response Spectra II - 28C Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 603.00 VT Floor Response Spectra II - 29A Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 623.00 NS Floor Response Spectra II - 29B Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 623.00 EW Floor Response Spectra II - 29C Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 623.00 VT Floor Response Spectra II - 30A Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 603.00 NS Floor Response Spectra II - 30B Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 603.00 EW Floor Response Spectra II - 30C Aux Bldg Area 6 Elevation 603.00 VT Floor Response Spectra II - 31A Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 565.00 NS Floor 1 Response Spectra II - 31B Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 565.00 EW Floor Response Spectra II - 31C Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 565.00 VT Floor Response Spectra II - 32A Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 585.00 NS Floor Response Spectra Supplement 1
'
.
! , LIST OF FIGURES (CONT'0) , II - 328 Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 585.00 EW Floor i Response Spectra II - 32C Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 585.00 VT Floor Response Spectra II - 33A Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 623.00 NS Floor Response Spectra II - 338 Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 623.00 EW Floor i Respose Spectra II - 33C Aux Bldg Area 7 Elevation 623.00 VT Floor 1 Response Spectra II - 34A Intake Structure Elevation 576.00 NS Floor Response Spectra II - 348 Intake Structure Elevation 576.00 EW Floor Response Spectra II - 34C Intake Structure Elevation 576.00 VT Floor Response Spectra l l Supplement 1
i
'
. l 2.6 Section VI discusses the evaluation of selected mechanical equip-ment, electrical equipment, and instrumentation. All of the equipment listed in Attachment 1 to the Staff's January 30, 1979 letter has been addressed. The data sheet for the emergency diesel generator will be submitted in a supplement to this report after the vendor completes a reevaluation. As discussed in Sec-tion VI, Paragraph 4.2.7, we anticipate that the reevaluation I will verify the conclusion that there is adequate margin when subjected to a 0.20g SSE. 2.7 Section VII discusses the conclusions drawn from the reevalu-ation.
- 3. Summary 3.1 The results of the reevaluation, which are discussed more fully throughout this report show that, even utilizing an SSE with an acceleration of 0.20g, the systems required to accomplish safe shutdown and continued shutdown heat removal will be able to function as designed. Furthermore, these results are themselves quite conservative, as discussed in the conclusions of Section 1 VII. This demonstrates that the Davis-Besse, Unit 1 design is acceptable in the event of a 0.20g SSE.
.
I-3 Supplement 1
--
'
i Sheet 3 TABLE II-2 (Continued) Location Spectra Percent Damping Figure No. Bldg. Area Elevation Description 0.20g SSE 0.15g SSE II-19A CIS - 595 Hor. NS 2 0.5 II-19B CIS - 595 Hor. EW 2 0.5 II-19C CIS - 595 Vert. 2 0.5 II-20A CIS - 603 Hor. NS 2 0.5 II-208 CIS - 603 Hor. EW 2 0.5 II-20C CIS - 603 Vert. 2 0.5 II-21A CIS - 618 Hor. NS 2 0.5 II-218 CIS - 618 Hor. EW 2 0.5 II-21C CIS - 618 Vert. 2 0.5 II-22A CIS - 630 Hor. NS 2 0.5 II-228 CIS - 630 Hor. EW 2 0.5 II-22C CIS - 630 Vert. 2 0.5 II-23A CIS - 653 Hor. NS 2 0.5 II-23B CIS - 653 Hor. EW 2 0.5 II-23C CIS - 653 Vert. 2 0.5 l II-24A CV - 589 Hor. 2 0.5 1 II-24B CV - 589 Vert. 2 0.5 l II-25A CV - 595 Hor. 2 0.5 l l II-25B CV - 595 Vert. 2 0.5 ! l II-26A CV - 609 Hor. 2 0.5 l II-268 CV - 609 Vert. 2 0.5 l I II'27A Aux. 6 585 . Hor. NS 3 1 II-278 Aux. 6 585 Hor. EW 2 1 II-27C Aux. 6 585 Vert. 3 1 , i l l
-
- , . . _ . . . _ . , _ , - . - -_.
'
,
Sheet 4 TABLE II-2 (Continued) 4 Location Spectra Percent Damping Figure No. Bldg. Area Elevation Description 0.20g SSE 0.15g SSE J II-28A Aux. 6 603 Hor. NS 3 1 II-288 Aux. 6 603 Hor. EW 3 1 II-28C Aux. 6 603 Vert. 3 1 II-29A Aux. 7 623 Hor. NS 3 1 II-29B Aux. 7 623 Hor. EW 3 1 II-29C Aux. 7 623 Vert. 3 1 II-30A Aux. 6 603 Hor. NS 3 1 11-308 Aux. 6 603 Hor. EW 3 1 II-30C Aux. 6 603 Vert. 3 1 II-31A Aux. 7 565 Hor. NS 3 1 II-31B Aux. 7 565 Hor. EW 3 1 i II-31C Aux. 7 565 Vert. 3 ,1 II-32A Aux. 7 585 Hor. NS 3 1 1 II-328 Aux. 7 585 Hor. EW 3 1 II-32C Aux. 7 585 Vert. 3 1 > II-33A Aux. 7 623 Hor. NS 4 1 II-338 Aux. 7 623 Hor. EW 4 1 II-33C Aux. 7 623 Vert. 4 1 II-34A INTS. - 576 Hor. NS 3 5 II-34B INTS. - 576 Hor. EW 3 5 II-34C INTS. - 576 Vert. 3 - LEGEND: Aux. - Auxiliary Building INTS. - Intake Structure CIS - Containment Internal Structures ! CV - Containment Vessel l Supplement 1 _
_ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ _ _ __ _ ____ -
'
.
.
5 9 NOILWW373338 02'E Ch',2 09,1
'
08' 00'j G8'h D Q~,h
-*
l . a e I : -- n
+ + + + +C D n
-
j '. - d [ ti dl I l r to u a i u r O d
,
a R - m 2D yao d ad W2
+ + + + h' s
-l z OE l O M o l n
- a. 77- N ui a e 08 + + + + '3 J .;
d s gi W '
- - I u - - U E
g a r _.1 _ _ - + + .I S u '--+___.s +
-N J
' >-
$
- N U 2
-
i N , . Z r z N w 4 H \ Q
$ + 3 S 6@ + + + ,
x ] u- t [ h @ 0
+
\
g W
$5y' + + + + g -
5
\
-
a I l.
> m' - w X
3 U m' u gy. + + + + + .,
-
[ a. m a-- .\ ' ri
\ s, F
z e \- .f H H z r l 8 J [
+ + + + + a %
u 6 E ui I
$
;W d u 1 2 a OmJ _
I a i Q Q 09'l Os'
'
'
f[
'
QE* E QW'2 09'h Q Q'h 5 9 NOI1WW37333W 3 t R Supplement 1 l
~
EZH] A 3 N 3 I l O 3 8_d (ev-sV) tog-Ena-9saV-s p
-
.. . .. . . , .. .. ., . - t g g
3
-
n , - - - -. .- wo m -
-
;
.
iPS'*
\
'
r--
\ /
r- n
+ t t + 'm g +a# A t
\ /
l \ /
/ 3
%
'
31 / n n / n ;- + + + + / t t + + En
=M nu / I-i .~ l n g n 21 = 21 31 l l 3
-4 -4 tay t + + I t t t t + $H nu i =o Z Z I
I
'l "' t t t j- t t + t -[ U nn " l =m I
I
*
$ t + t -I t t t +
- l =
i 00* NTild H'vQ d I r+-pisso t-9a .5. LJ
- n. x
'
b 3'55 ~92' 3D1 N OCO =9dWE OD EO9 =4373 + 1NIDd WMW133d5 NOI1WW37333W ud133d5 35NDd538 3 107.d M3 9 W3HW 9[79 xnw E LING 35539-SI AWIL 80E-II 380913
.
O
- - , -. ..- -. - . - - - - --
- __ '
. 5 5 N3LLed31333e c:'t cs'2
. c c .2 cii cci ts cc -j
-
g .
- a. ; .
n % i - O o ' *
+ + + 4 4 -
t ul 1 1 il gi r a j . 0, U 1 u I il R a
*
-
', J dO + + + +
-
,,-+
'
j Z O ~
'
a n r----------- L # p 1 O a 4 ~~~~~ u +
-
't .+ +
.
N z n := E s u
,
g I U D J \ a u + + + / + s +
\
J
! \
( 2 \ u 8 o E E, \ Z M H O2 \ g
$ 6E + + + -$ + 2
]
m z sa a: c a 5 0r U
+ + + + + ;!
J J a u: m zm X Um + + + + J [ u1 m -
+
\
<
m 0- g N \ . Z \ 2 3 Gn Z
" l '
E 5
> l 3 [ l E y y + + + + + i g ?
m ; i g N I h i EJ G5'2
'
00'2
'
05'l G D'I Os' _ 00' " ] l
$ Q G'E 5 9 NGI1WW37333W s
[ P Supplement 1
'
.
.
NOIibd3-)333g a gg
,.
' % C2 e..;
02'8 OC8
'I O 0- 8' E M W H O " + l a
U
'
+ + * + D I
'
5 y O. II Tl m d of D. U r 7l t-
~
m R J Z 0 So c- ,
" ~ - - - ~
+ + .g g
\ M E M \
N D + \+ + + .:~ U ll s _ : I dU ,J 7 ' y m d + - r + + .i g Z I__ h E a t N u at U F \ x Z 5gg 6 .a y
- a R
f + 4 - + + +
)
w
= J @
hEX r f , N W A
* + +\ N
+ .,
-" @
hh F N N k H U N + .. W + + + 4 b 1 w' ym m N - 3 Z \ ! i I 3
$"ma u lo + + + , ,
E + + g W I
- 5dy DU H
I h< 5 d E E R 02'i OD's Di~ gg-
..
UU 5 3 NGI1MW373 38 Supplement 1
.
.- _ __ .
.
.
FIGURE 11-31B , 3RVIS-bESSE UNIT 1 RUX ELIG RRER 7 EW FLOOR RESPONSE SPECTRH POINT 1 ELEV= E6E.OD 31 MPG = .030 RCCELERRTION SPECTRUM o m LOC m m_ . D.2DG 53.E . . . .. r7 I)4 '
/ l
\ -
.
- . . . . ,9 . .
p' . -
; i i
,s - m -
m i Eg
+
g E.- + + + W ( ([ +I 2 , f l l
'
2 u
-
a / \ .S H H E. + + + l4 + e-
.e.
/ un +\ e a
,
e u a / l U U a . a / \ 0 + + / + + + +i i + "M U U E i J [ / I
,
/
R o
+ a 2,2'~ m o
m- + + + + + + +gm o.uoi
,. ? /
q - _j b". g i .; . '.. Jo .o 'so. mo . 3 8-AU87-EW3-565(AB-108) E FREQUENCY EHZJ , k *#/ l
.
O m" ZG xnl'nnm3 g u.o E s .- ak h "- " r* i - H D i E ll D J- + + + t y7 ___
.
-
-
.
3 L __ d : O_ 5 D lO' . d 3 W _ 5 E ' t t
,
N \
\
5 O g g \ o d + + + ;\ k t -n 5 0 e
] 0 H 5' ~
9 E
~
N O 5
+ t ( I T + +
n o Z D H
- t C
, N A _ J 3 ' ] 7 a 1 3 + + '+-
+ + .
4
' A 1
8 T ' 3 3 8 1 N
'
N W I N / 3 D O d + + ol + / t + w e n D l E NO E 9 0*
-
7 8 5s 9 9 I I X W 3 0i N d + 3
+ +
_ e
+ +
_ _
. .
3 8 0 M W n W f 14 8V 0Q
*
'
-t 8
_ _ 9 1 _d 1 4 T 3 , 3 + + + + '
/
v I d 3 j I N 5 5' '
/
( s 5' o n N s
-
D D a v 3 5 I O ) s 1 E 9 5 3 W O
*
-
+ + t ;r' 5 H + + 0 1
9- 3 ,
- A-
'LE 1"
_ 5 I 3 3 _ D V A 3 3 D- I _
.
6
-
H W 1 E eG
-
h
- -
"
**
*e =.
-
g.r E .- n m* ZG 2nInnn3 _ _
-
_ _ - mgEo uy _ _
- r
___
- a 5 S NCIibe3732 e 00,2 C5,1 G2,1 C2 04 C; [
th12
':
[ O W w l
-[ M W 0 l F + + 0 l U
'
+ + + -
3 a u n C. 11 ' -l W IS
.
D. U I /OII W Z R
-
,d o
hO + F" ~~~ ~ T _+ + -l u o L. - z u ___ _ \ n z 0 \
+ + + + + ~
D a s H 7 I
'
S _
+
____a + +
-
E u U + +
%
('m U1 m Z d g \ h
~
w N t U e
$
e U z F Z Z
$ + -2 b
+ + +
a a 4, R N LJ s5 + + + + \ ;! g [ E \N ~ F u li-a + + +N 4 U + + F 0. y
. h
] \ T Z \
Q D L3 -
- U H O' } k
$F N.
$Ea + + + + + I I
g fa aU H U l E ~ l k # R ' R h'2
'
B 0'2 OS'l 02'I OB' Q$' 00 5 9 NOI18837333W i Supplement 1 l
*
.
~ . . . ..
5 S NC Ili::6313 3 3 b C i- CC j
'
CS,l CE QW2 ti,2 G2.1 i '~
- C D 4 T F1
$ .
Y O " 1 U
'
+ + + + +o q 3 W F.
- 0. Il .
m O U IL r R
. / Oll U1 Z -
,_J n
ha + r ~~~ ~ + A + .j U O L__ a u g r, m E u N
.;
enh J t + + + ' 7
+ '
1
+ I~ + 1 m $
3
"
N
+G[~ - >-
d u[
- e 7<-
w E Z Jy [ H ce ya + + + * + .: g i
@
u R Y h 3
+ + + + \ '
3 1 [ E \ k
!
a u + + N 4
'
i W + + + F 1 U' N ! H Wm T 2 l Z m. C 3 \ 2 \ /. D G \I - 5 U H O' E
$F y E O N
+ + + + + l ,g 7
a y
' J l .:. I 8 l E
c Wa de -
#
= l R
'
Di' QN' 00 i DV2 00'2 05'l 02'l 5 9 NOILWM3 1333W
!
Supplement 1 l
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _
.
l [ZH] ^]N3RO3BJ (,,s..,3ses.c24-t av.zi
- e- T ,
....i. es n. n n.- a ni e ee ai n.ll3
,g
..
- u. 4- .
, .. .
7
-
=
y
/ i 8 -
S//'O l /
/ ' {
- 1. + 1 + * '- * * ~3 a"
.
f [+ 3
.c n
--
[ n i M g- + 1 t- t t t lf + t t -fna n /s r r i n n 23
.51 31
!! I H
-t
+ + + + + + t .gg sg j+ a rj s ,
z
< .
, F I
i L1 .- t + + + + + + -m G1 es
"
ol6 'X//dtt/VO (i "m IV9/S 3G l-9 G w t t + + t + + + -G C- . m u
--
-
U, '
' ' ' ' ' '
3'55' 902'O' 301 $ OED = D d W LC 00'5W5 =A373 2 1NIOd WMH133d5 NDI1HH373338 661J7d5 35 nod 53d MOD .:1 1A 1 ts3 bH D E ~ led Xnu I IINn 3553rd-5I AUT 32E-II 38091.4
.
e
* .
e o S
.
.
..T. .
.
'.= 1
,2 C
~
,
! $.
-
-
E 1
-
J
*
+ + + + -
E Y t; e kf E -
>
U E *{
,
f R E : Z Of l
-
O W hO U o 7h+ T Mja
+ +
('~ '
+ -{
E M r PT 1 n a + ' = N o + + + + -j+ -- s e n - - I a 3 ' ' u U .. _._ _ _ _ ___ - - , u m U , 4 + + + e Z - --- _.__ , y lA \
< [, \
Si UE F Z
\
g Z
~
$ \
+
, b
+ + +\ '*
W G 0, 4
\ ]
$ R NN O si u.
X E + + + + 3 [ 3 K h+\ ~ 3 F \ li-a u U + + + + + \ *
- H a
m u g'
\
Z m, \ _ g 3 Z \ - 0 13 E W H 0- 6 W H N W E
- D + ,+ l
+ + ,
$[$
i
+
I 4 E , h;U W -
!
I N s I d0 t J
'
l
- E
"
GD E G5'2 G G'2 05'l 00't G5- G G' 5 9 NOIlbb37333B , Supplement 1 1
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
* .
1
.. .. ;.
~
. ._.. __ -_. ..-_ . . . .
*
. O .
, .
. x ~ $
*
~O j
.
_
-
-' + + + + + g jy r
- , b
!
. c
-- p .
.
- e J l
. . t /
- ,n r, .
,1 s '
,,
r .', J - a + f. 0 + + + /+ -
!5 w2 Ls ea 5 an P-T C N Tf I n
' a + da ,- +. + + . - a,
=
N u n ~{ J h
"
) ' '
1
' u
.1 U
.
r_____2__.____-.'- L ~ ~ ~+
+ +
,
.
,
e u co , W _+ p M m f= lA -
~~~~~_\ \
d E
-
.a a r E Z
. \
\
Z cr E N D D \ a
+ + + + g+
$
u cg R
- .
g \
.c \
xr N U a3 + + + + + g ' g g
"
[ E \ 1. F u_ i.,r4 U - g W + + + . + + g 4
> D. g' \
.': H Z m m
.
.3 m. \ -
s*;' z D t.3
.i:~g
..
yH O' g m F N X U ED 3
+
.
+ + + ,+ ..
a$- l 4
'hH JW U l
@
S 1 y0J - l 5 [ l e E ' ' ' 00 , U2 h DQ'h 02'E C h'2 09'l 05' 5 D NOI166373]]b Supplement 1
.
.
e
.
s $ N - . "
. -. .
, -
. .e ,
.
.
-
,
"
s O r
- t, . -
.e h r
-
-
. -
; .
..
. , - .
t r _ 7 _. . D' + +
.
,t l"
-
+2 i
1 t- n w* g " 3 .i
;:
d =
.
i a a--
,-
a' O .- n
-
.
.
d t - 3 W 1 s, o - G E . i L l iI
,
O d N 1 g fl l l l 1 I l l !
"
O + F + + + ." 5 O J- I g d E' f 2 / E 8 9 ' Z
.
- 0 + / . + + + ?
0 7 A C . fv / .' H
1 3 / ' . J 7 / 1 3 . + + f+ + + ?' A - 1
.
- A 5
3 E E U 3 I
- 3 8
1 N N I 8 I / 3 3 8 D O d + + +/ + + .'
"
n 0 9 E /
.I-7 /
l 9 / X W +/ / + 3 n n + + + ." i d H
.
'
S T 1 3
/ .
_ d 3 + + + + + T I d 3 I / N 5 5 / n N 5. j . O - m 3 I OD.
.
s 5 1 E -
,
5
- m 3 W O +
.
9 W .
+ + + + T '
m-
-
3 7 5 I 3 3 * - A 3 0 . a W 3 W 7 'a E aw-
-
=6 t t aa t ,?
mQ zay $nrnn$ v
>Sa~e8co -
r
EZHJ A3N3n 3 8_d p. 3,, . ... ..
-
aos oe , r r at g o,
.. i. .
. . . , , _ _ . . _ . _ _t .
oiw y
-g
.- @z-4 4] j. ' A g
# ::s M
j TY -- l , + t t y t + f l /
\ /
I /
'
\ / 3 e.
l 7 .M
- i t
\
t + t t
.
t t mn
, "M i / r
-
n
/ x
\ 3
.
l / _a
+ \ +
.
}
t t / + t t t 'h, H
.
I "O i / Z
/
, /
*
! . + -l + + t t + EU
.: I =
m l s. . m \... .n,.e i
/
,
Wi* = A's % d ,'(
; L/ +
. , +
l
+ + t + + -[a
.
"
355 DE'O 3 D "1 $ a l. I e *!-JNil _ 00 915 = A 3 13 2 _..IDd Wnhl133d5 NOI1HM3".333W e ic s a s. it .. "sG NLid S 3 d N 0 0 1.J SN 38n13nH15 3 H W it4 * 'E lINn 35539-SIAbtL VVE-II 3B091:1 . e
= m-
.
.
_
-
e
.
_ i
- i. ' . .
,.'!.
. i * '!t : l ,; l .lI II;tfj . .
.
. . i ..
0 r
.
v.
.
5
- ei
, d .
.
.
.
. .
D' '
.
.
tss t e e
. +s,-
t,. .
.
*
.
q4 e ,.L s .,
.
.
a m.-
.*
i s
.. .-- -
J . .
.
N A' ~ .. s Q . g i -.
% Ie \ II .
.
.
.
.
j
- -s u L
,
- 4 1 t t 4
- -
3
2
'
9 - / E 4 5 / .
- i
-
+ + + t + -u O
2
.
H 3 A
- i
!
/
- t H
O ]
+/ /
.' o T + t t + -w n_ m A
3 M 2 % ~ 7 ] 8 t 3
s 1 N / N E
-
n I O /" O 3 I I 1 3 n d
. + t +
/
t t f n 3 t i B / El f 1 l D 5 3 / 3
.I l
-
3 W n5 G. t t t / t
-t S
B M M . _ W 1 . d 1 3 9. N 3 2 t t t t ty T I d 0
-
5 V E N , l O I I (5 - N 1 / n n 8 . a
)
8 + t + + t t- t9 3 3 # s
-
5 1
- us 5 3 3 a-3r 3 0 s d
I a a
- 3 6
7 - . T i t 5 I cE s as_
-
m
-
$. "O h a A mG ZOH4hnInn"3 ~
t a d mh"gC.$ -
'r
__ _ _ _ _ ___ . - _ _ _ -. _ l t i EZHJ A ]N 3 FI 3 8_d 945-01A-SJall- *
.... .. o. n on o nt ne on et ,
^ a- r -
- . % +2
'C E
os
~l "ct.
;;
.. ga s
,
+ t t t t t t g v3 5
.
le is 3 is t t t n s .. . . t t t t ~.c n r so n I'l r-il n 11 3
' 3 e!;; t t t o t t + + jd
-' a Z
; ; t t in t t t t t + tEm
+ + t t t +
.
.,. t t . G ao
'
I'; '
'
,, 355 '9E'O ' 307 DEO' =9dW[ '00'915 C A313 E 1NIDd WOW 133d5 NOI1WW3~1333W WB133d5 3GNOd53W WOO 7J 1A 3Mn13nW15 3HW1NI T lINn 35534-5IAWT 3tE-II 3U091:1
.
e
- _ _ - _ - _ - _ - - - - _ _ _ - - - - . . -
'
. VI. EVALUATION OF MECHANICAL EQUIPMENT, ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT, AND INSTRUMENTATION
- 1. Introduction 1.1 Various components have been selected for evaluation which are representative of mechanical, electrical, and control systems components required for shutdown. The components selected were those listed in Attachment 1 of the NRC Staff guidance trans-mittal of January 30, 1979. These components have either been evaluated or are in the process of being evaluated to provide a high degree of assurance that safe shutdown and continued heat removal can be accomplished after an SSE of 0.20g acceleration.
As discussed in Section I, the completed reevaluation of the I emergency desel generator will be included in a supplement to this report.
- 1. 2 Table VI-1 lists the components selected for evaluation and summarizes the pertinent information for each component. It includes the location of the component, the figure number (figure to be found in Section II) giving the appropriate response spectra for that location, the method of qualification for the component, and the data sheet number where more detailed seismic qualification information is provided. The data shaets are included in this section. They follow the format of Attachment 2 of the NRC letter. A brief discussion of the qualification of the selected equipment follows.
- 2. Electrical Components (Table VI-1 Items 13-18 and 20-21) 2.1 All safety related electrical equipment has been qualified either by test or analysis on the basis of the appropriate floor response spectra generated by the 0.15g SSE. Reference to Table VI-1 indicates the method of qualification.
2.2 The revised floor response spectra have been used to determine the margin available for the 0.20g acceleration SSE. 2.3 For the components which were qualified for the 0.15g SSE by testing, the test method was either sine beat or sine dwell, with highly conservative input levels. In some cases, equipment was subjected to as many as 75 sine beat tests and to sine dwells as long as 45 seconds. Based on the high input levels and the conservative nature of sine beat and sine dwell testing at resonance and integer frequencies, it is concluded that the margin for each component is sufficient to qualify it to the revised seismic requirements. VI-1 Supplement 1
.
*
.
2.3.1 As an example of the above, the 5 KV metal clad switchgear (Item 13 of Table VI-1) is discussed here. In this case, damping was first determined using sine sweep and the relation ( =h Where & = damping (percent of critical damping) Q = amplification
~
Quasi-retonance magnification curves were used to compare floor response spectra curves to maximum equipment buildup at resonance. The amplification was determined to be 5.5 times tne peak value of the sire beat input acceleration. The required test input was de-terminud to be 0.21g. However, the actual test input excitation was 0.3g, approximately four (4) times the required level. The rsvised floor response spectra, based on the 0.20g zero period atcaleration (ZPA) SSE using 3 percent damping, normalized to 5 p.ircent damping (consistent with the component damping), indicates a peak floor response at the equipment mounting location of 2.16g in the peak range of 5-7 hertz. The required test input is deter-mined to be 0.39g. Since the actual test input was 0.8g, the re-quired input for the 0.20g SSE is exceeded by a factor of two (2). 2.3.2 The other components which were qualified by sine beat or sine dwell testing were evaluated for margin, and in all cases, there was sufficient margin to qualify the components for the revised (0.20g) SSE requirements. 2.4 Items 16 and 18 of Table VI-1 were qualified by analysis. Their respective data sheets indicate the stresses calc'ilated for the 0.15g SSE on the critical structural elements. The seismic factor (defined in Section IV, Paragraph 1.1) is also calculated for these components. 2.4.1 The seismic factor for the critical structural elements of the unit substation transformers are quita large, indicating a large available stress reserve. Obviously, the transformers would function under the imposition of a 0.20g SSE. 2.4.2 The seismic factor for the critical elem its of the battery racks for the 0.15g SSE are not as high, but still provide margin for a higher SSE. To ensure that these critical elements would not be overstressed due to a 0.20g SSE, the stresses and the seismic factor for such an SSE have been calculated and are reported below: VI-2 l ! ,
--
_ __ _ _
* .
, (a) (b) (c) (c)-_(51
,
Identification Seismic Total Stress (e.)
'
Stress Stress Allowable Unistrut P-1000 (pc. 3) 23643 27592 28800 0.05 Side and End Stringers
- 26064 28800 0.11 (pcs. 12 & 13)
Tubing (pc. 10)
- 22820 28800 0.26 Brace
- 6025 7390 0.23 Angle Iron Frame 14064 22980 28800 0.41 Support (pc. 1)
- Anchor Bolts 27952 38800 0.388
- Tube Connection to 15918 28800 0.809 Bottom Support
- 0.177 Channel Connecticn to 18695 22000 Bottom Support 8
assume seismic stress is total stress 2.4.3 In the cases noted above where qualification was demonstrated by analysis, it is concluded that stresses were below the allow-ables for both the 0.15g and 0.20g SSE cases. Therefore, there is sufficient margin to qualify the components for the revised (0.20g) SSE requirements. j
- 3. Control Panels and Instruments (Table VI-1 Item 19) 3.1 The auxiliary shutdown panel was evaluated as representative of a control panel with instrumer.ts required for shutdown. The panel was qualified by analysis, while the instruments were qualified by testing, for the 0.15g SSE.
3.2 The revised floor resp 2nse spectra have been used to determine the acceptability of the installation for the 0.20g SSE. 3.3 The data sheet for the panel indicates the stresses calculated on the side of the panel and on the anchor bolts. The seismic factor (defined in Section IV, paragraph 1.1) is also calculated. To ensure that the panel would withstand the loads due to a 0 20g SSE, the stresses and seismic factors for such an SSE have been calculated and are reported below: VI-3
.
'
.
(a) (b) (c) (c) - (b) Identification Seismic Total Stress (a) Stress Stress Allowable
Panel 780 psi 780 psi 1610 psi 1.1 Anchor Bolts 9 ksi 9 ksi 20 ksi 1.2 The maximum deflection is calculated to be 0.0049 inch. This will not adsersely affect functional operability. The natural frequencies of vibration are greater than 33 Hz for the . structural system and various panel sections including the instrument package panels. Dynamic amplification of the flat spectra response of seismic acceleration is found to be a maximum of 0.87g in the structural system in the horizontal direction and 0.47g in the vertical direction. Use of these amplified dynamic loads as well as static loads with both horizontal and vertical effects show the bending, tensile and shear stresses in the various structural members and connections to be much lower than the maximum allowable stresses. Stresses in the anchor bolts are quite low and load capacity in the welds are quite high. Displacements in the instrument package panel sections are quite > small and will not cause loss of function of the equipment. Loading of the panel plate sections and panel frz.me has been found to be much less than that required for buckling. The analysis methods used subjected the structural elements to more critical conditions than would be encountered by the structural system in a prototype environ-ment. It is concluded that the panel is structurally adequate to function properly when subjected to loadings associated with a 0.20g SSE. 3.4 The seismic test reports for the instruments mounted on the auxiliary shutdown panel have been reviewed. The data sheets summarize the pertinent information. The qualification testing envelops the revised response spectra, ensuring that the in-stroents will be operable for the 0.20g SSE. j 4.0 Mechanical Components (Table VI-1 Items 1-12 and 21-24) 4.1 Mechanical components required to accomplish safe hot shutdown after a seismic event and continued shutdown heat removal were originally qualified by analysis on the basis of the appropriate floor response spectra generated by a 0.15g SSE. A review and/or reanalysis has been performed for Items 1-12 and 21-24 to determine the margins available for a 0.020g acceleration SSE. In some cases, 1 the original seismic analysis (0.15g SSE) used acceleration values which envelope the acceleration values generated by a 0.20g SSE floor response spectra. In these cases, a reanalysis was not re-quired. In most cases, however, a new seismic analysis was per-formed on the basis of the appropriate floor response spectra generated by a 0.20g SSE. The mechanical components are listed - in Table VI-1, Items 1-12 and Items 21-24. VI-4 Supplement 1
'
.
.
4.2 A summary of the reanalysis for each of the mechanical components listed in Table VI-1 is described below. Items 21, 22, 23, and 24 were added to the Table by Toledo Edison after a review of the equipment required to accomplish safe hot shutdown after a seis-mic event and continued shutdown heat removal. 4.2.1 Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps The original seismic analysis performed by the p"mp vendor (Byron Jackson) showed that the equipment is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. Byron Jackson revised their original seismic analysis to incorpo-rate the required accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. This revised analysis showed the equipment had adequate margins when subjected to a 0.20g SSE. See Data Sheet 1. All stresses and deflections were within the allowable values. 4.2.2 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchangers The original seismic analysis performed by the vendor (Structhers Wells) showed that the equipment is qualified for the 0.15g SSE. The vendor performed a new seismic analysis incorporating the required accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. The new analysis used current state-of-the-art techniques for modeling the heat ex-changer and resulted in the determination of lower natural frequencies. These lower natural frequencies and the current i state-of-the-art modeling techniques resulted in the analysis showing insufficient margin for the anchor bolts and the base of the fixed support. The original analysis was then reviewsd using the ctrrent ana-lytical techniques. This review indhated that for 0.15g SSE the anchor bolts and base of the fixed srpport did not meet their original design margin. Therefore, it was decided to modify the saddle supports during the spring 1980 refueling outage to meet their original design margins for a 0.15g SSE. These modifica-tions also provide margin when the heat exchanger is subjected to a 0.20g SSE. It should be emphasized that this modification was made due to a change in analytical methodology and not inadequate margin for a 0.20g SSE. The calculated stress values shown in Data Sheet 2 reflect the modified saddle supports. 4.2.3 Diesel Fuel Oil Day Tanks The vendor (Richmond Engineering Company) revised the original seismic analysis to incorporate the required accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. The new analysis showed that the expansion anchors did not have a factor of safety of at least 4.0 in accordance with the bolt manufacturer's recommendation. A review of the as-built anchoring condition for the tank revealed that the anchor bolts did not have a factor of safety of 4.0 for a 0.15g SSE. However, the installed factor of safety was greater than 2.0. Modifications to the tank saddle supports are presently being made during the Spring 1980 refueling outage so that the VI-5 Supplement 1
_
'
,
installed factor of safety will be greater than 4.0 for a 0.1Fg SSE. This will also provide adequate margin for a 0.20g SSE. It should be emphasized that these modifications were necessitated by as-built conditions and not an increase in SSE accelerations from 0.15g to 0.20g. The vendor's new seismic analysis for a 0.20g SSE shows that the circumferential bending stress at the horn of the saddle is greater than the allowable stress. Based on a review of the conservatisms in the code and the ven-dors conservative analytical techniques, we believe that there is still sufficient margin in the design against failure. 4.2.4 Service Water Pumps and Motors The original seismic analysis performed by the pump vendor (Goulds Pumps) showed that the equipment is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. Goulds Pump revised their original seismic analysis to incorpo-rate the required accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. This revised analysis showed the equipment had adequate margins when subjected to a 0.20g SSE. See Data Sheet 4. The original seismic analysis which was done for the motors used seismic accelerations which are higher than the accelerations required by either a 0.15g SSE or a 0.20g SSE. The seismic 6;celerations used for the motor analysis are shown on Data Sheet. 4. All stresses and deflections for the pumps and motors were within the allowable values. 4.2.5 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Turbine 1 The original seismic analysis which was done for the auxiliary feedwater pump turbine used seismic accelerations which are higher than the accelerations required by either a 0.15g SSE of a 0.20g SSE. The seismic accelerations used for the analysis are shown on Data Sheet 5. All stresses and deflectior.s were within the allowable values. 4.2.6 Borated Water Storage Tank The seismic loads for a 0.20g SSE were calculated by Bechtel Power Corporation. These calculations showed that the loads for a 0.20g SSE are lower than the seismic loads used for the origi-nal tank design based on a 0.15g SSE. Stress checks indicate that all stresses calculated for a 0.20g SSE were well below allowable values. Reference Data Sheet 6. 4.2.7 Emergency Diesel and Generator The original seismic analysis performed by the vendor (Bruce GM Diesel,'now Power Systems) showed that this equipment is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. The vendor is presently in the process of pre-paring a new seismic analysis report incorporating the required VI-6 Supplement 1
_. - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*
. accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. The preliminary results of the new analysis will be completed by June 6, 1980 and will be reported by June 12, 1980. The equipment supplier, Power Systems, has stated that, based on 0.15g SSE analysis, the margins for all items analyzed were high and that a significantly higher seismic load could be carried before exceeding allowable stresses. Therefore, we anticipate that the new seismic analysis will verify the equipment to have adequate margin to withstand a 0.20g SSE. 4.2.8 Emergency Diesel Cooling Water Heat Exchanger This equipment is included in the analysis of the emergency diesel and generator. Refer to Paragraph 4.2.7. 4.2.9 Decay Heat Removal Cooler The origina! seismic analysis performed by the equipment supplier (Atlas, a supplier to Babcock and Wilcox) showed that the coolers are qualified for a 0.15g SSE. Babcock and Wilcox evaluated the new seismic response curves to determine the applicable loads for a 0.20g SSE. The new loads were considerably less than those used by Atlas in the design of the coolers. Therafore, the coolers have sufficient margin to withstand a 0.2Vg SSE. Refer to Data Sheet 9. 4.2.10 Decay Heat Removal Pump ar 1 Motor The original seismic analysis performed by the vendor (B&W) sh ved that the equipment is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. B&W reevaluated the critical structural components based on the peak I accelerations of the applicable 0.20g SSE response spectra, and showed that all stresses for the pump and motor were within allowable values. Refer to Data Sheet 10. 4.2.11 Decay Heat Removal Suction Valves HV-OH11 and HV-DH12 and Motor Operators The original seismic analysis which was done for these valves and motor operators used seismic accclerations which are higher than the accelerations acting on the valves during either a 0.15g SSE , or a 0.20g SSE. The accelerations used in the seismic analysis are shown on Data Sheet 11. All stresses were within allowable values. 4.2.12 Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Steam Inlet Valve MS-106 The original seismic analysis which was done for this valve and motor operator used seismic accelerations which are higher than the accelerations acting on the valve during either a 0.15g SSE or a 02.0g SSE. The accelerations used in the seismic analysis are shown on Data Sheet 12. All stresses were within allowable values. VI-7 Supplement 1
*
.
4.2.13 Component Cooling Water Pumps and Motors The original seismic analysis performed by the pump vendor (Goulds Pumps) showed that the equiptrent is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. The vendor performed a new seismic analysis to incorporate the required accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. The new analysis showed the equipment had adequate margins when subjected to a 0.20g SSE. See Data Sheet 21. The original seismic analysis which was done for the motors used seismic accelerations which are a higher than the accelerations required by either a 0.15g SSE or a 0.20g SSE. The seismic accelerations used for the motor analysis are shown on Data Sheet 21. All stresses and deflections for the pumps and motors were within the allowable values. 4.2.14 Component Cooling Water Surge Tank The original seismic analysis performed by the tank vendor (Brown-Minneapolis) showed that the equipment is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. A new seismic analysis was done by Bechtel Power Corpora-tion to incorporate the required accelerations for a 0.20g SSE. All stresses and deflections for the tank were within the allow-able values. Refer to Data Sheet 22. 4.2.15 Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank The original seismic analysis performed by the tank vendor (Rich-mond Engineering Company) showed that the equipment is qualified for a 0.15g SSE. The vendor reanalyzed the equipment based on the 0.20g SSE response spectra, and the reanalysis showed no 1 appreciable difference (0.26 percent increase) in seismic accelera-tion response of the vessel from that used in the original anal-ysis. Therefore, it is concluded that the vessels have adequate margins to withstand a 0.20g SSE. See Data Sheet 23. 4.2.16 Diesel Fuel Oil Storage Tank Transfer Pumps and Motors The original seismic analysis which was done for this equipment used seismic accelerations which are higher than the accelera-tions required by either a 0.15g SSE or a 0.20g SSE. All stresses and deflections were within tne allowable values. The analysis used accelerations of 1.2g horizontal and 0.8g vertical, and considered the horizontal and vertical loads to act simulta-neously. The peak acceleration values applicable for these pumps are 0.75g horizontal and 0.72g vertical as shown in Figure II-1 and II-2 (using 3 percent damping per Table II-1). A Data Sheet has not been included for these components because additional data from the equipment supplier is not available. VI-8 Supplement 1
* .
5.0 Summary ; ) 5.1 The components selected and evaluated have been shown to have sufficient margin to perform their function when subjected to an 0.20g SSE. Modifications are being made to two mechanical com-ponents, component cooling water heat exchangers and diesel fuel 1 oil day tanks. However, these modifications are not a result of an increase in SSE acceleration from 0.15g to 0.20g, but are the , result of reevaluating the 0.15g analysis in light of current
- analytical techniques and as-built field conditions. When these
- modifications are complete these components will have sufficient margin to withstand a 0.20g SSE.
i s J VI-9 Supplement 1
----y
__
.
.
TABLE VI-I
SUMMARY
OF QUALIFICATION OF SELECTED COMPONENTS Location Response Spectra Qualification Data Sheet Component Bldg. Area Elevation Figure No. Method No.
- 1. Auxiliary feedwater Aux. 7 567 II-31A, B, C Analysis 1 pump
- 2. Component cooling Aux. 7 585 II-32A, B, C Analysis 2 water heat exchanger
- 3. Diesel fuel oil day Aux. 6 595 II-30A, B, C Analysis 3 tank 4 Service water pumps INTS. -
576 II-34A, B, C Analysis 4
- 5. Auxiliary feedwater Aux. 7 567 II-31A, B, C Analysis 5 pump turbine
- 6. Borated water Outside -
585 II-1, II-2 Analysis 6 I storage tank
- 7. Emerger.cy diesel Aux. 6 585 Later Analysis 7 (Later) and generator g? 8. Emergency diesel Aux. 6 585 Later Analysis Included with
- g cooling water heat Sheet No. 7
-
exchanger k" Analysis g 9. Decay heat removal Aux. 7 545 II-1, II-2 9
- p. Cooler
- 10. Decay neat removal Aux. 7 545 II-1, II-2 Analysis 10 pump and motor
- 11. Decay heat removal CIS. 9 560 None Analysis 11 suction valves HV See Data Sheet DH11 and 12 and motor operators i
. _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
- TABLE VI-1 (Continued) location Response Spectra Qualification Data Sheet Component Bldg. Area Elevation Figure No. Method No.
- 12. Auxiliary feedwater Aux. 7 624.5 None Analysis 12 1 pump steam inlet See Data Sheet valve MS-106 .
- 13. 5 KV switchgear Aux. 6 585 II-27A, B, C Test 13
- 14. Motor control center Aux. 6 603 II-28A, B, C Test 14 (typical of AC and DC)
- 15. 125 V battery and Aux. 6 603 II-28A, B, C Test (batteries) 15 battery racks and analysis 4
(racks)
- 16. 125 V battery charger Aux. 6 603 II-28A, B, C Test 16
- 17. 480 V unit substation Aux. 6 603 II-28A, B, C Analysis 17 transformers
- 18. Auxiliary shutdown Aux. 6 585 II-27A, B, C Analysis (panel) 18A- 18F panel and instruments and test (in-struments)
- 19. SFAS cabinets Aux. 7 623 II-29A, B, C Test 19
,
- 20. SFRCS cabinets Aux. 7 623 II-29A, B, C Test 20
- 21. Component cooling Aux. 7 585 II-32A, B, C Analysis 21
, v3 Water pumps & motors 4 i , e ib 22. Component cooling Aux. 7 623 II-33A, B, C Analysis 22 3 " g_ Water surge tank 5 23. Diesel fuel oil Outside - 585 II-I, II-2 Analysis 23
""
Storage tank
*
.
*
..
.
.
TABLE VI-1 (Continued) Location Response Spectra Qualification Data Sheet Component Bldg. Area Elevation Figure No. Method No.
- 24. Diesel fuel oil Located inside 585 I I-1, 11-1 Analysis Not available, see Il storage tank the Diesel fuel Section 4.2.16 transfer pumps oil storage tank
& motors NOTES:
Aux. - auxiliary building CIS. - containment internal structures INTS. - intake structure E 4 - a u
_. ___ _ _ . -__ _ _ _ . _ _
,
. SheQt 1 of 3
,
Data Sheet 1 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
'
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Auxiliary Feedwater Pumps
! ! 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] BOP i '
- 2. Model Number: 4x6x90-7 Stage DVMX Quantity: 2 l
- 3. Vendor: Byron Jackson Pump Division
- 4. If the component is a caoinet or panel, name and model Nu. of the
! devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Horizontal centrifugal turbine-driven pump
- b. Dimensions 12'-3" L x 3'-7" W x 4'-7" H I
- c. Weight Approx. 5,000 lbs.
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building, Area '
Elevation 565 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 8 , Size lb" )
[ ] Weld (Length _) , [] l 1
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): )
l ALL: 152 Hz. F/B: 162 Hz. V,: 336 Hz
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provide emergency feedwater to the steam generators to remove heat from the primary system.
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
<
[X] Both assuming non-seismic equipment is 1 not available
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-N-36,
. 7749-C-41A Supplement 1 l
.--- -
- - ..-- . , _ . -- , , _ - - - . . . . -
. Sh;et 2 of 3 .
Data Sheet 1 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X] Yes [ ] No
- IV. Equipment Qualification Method
- Test:
Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Byron Jackson Report No. TCF-1021-SEI, Rev. 2 (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Figures II-31A,B C
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.29)
S/S = 0.2299: F/B = 0.2129 V= 0.1989 VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[] <
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length _) [ ]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
, Supplement 1 _ . _ _ _
,
- SAzet 3 of 3 Data Sheet i VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: Analysis: All frequencies greater than 33 Hz. Therefore, the ZPA was applied to pump weights and a static analysis was performed.
- 2. Method of Analysis
[X] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [X] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [X} Computer Codes: Byron Jackson Program CRTSPD Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: N/A
[ ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other: N/A (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-l
- 7. Support Considera'. ions in the model: Fixed at foundation- !
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
;
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) l
'
- 27,000
- Hold down bolts Pump to 797 Baseplate
- 6,477 75,600
- Hold down dowels Pump to Baseplate
- Not available from the analysis Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Lccation Operability Pump Shaft .00232" None, since running clearances are greater than deflection.
Supplement 1 1 I l l
._ _
. ._ ,_.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*
. Shtet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 2 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Tyge:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Component Cooling Water Heat Exchangers
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] BOP
- 2. Model Number: Type 61-31 Nil-5H Quantity: 3
- 3. Vendor: Struthers Wells Corporation
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Shell & tube, TEMA R Heat Exchanger
- b. Dimensions 37'-4" L x 67" 0
- c. Weight 101,932 lbs. flooded
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building, Area 7 Elevation 585 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 4 , Size 1" ) 2 bolts in fixed
[ ] Weld (Length ) support, 2 bolts [] in sliding suppor-
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
ALL: 25.3 Hz F/B: 19.9 Hz V: 19.9 Hz
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provide heat removal capability for reactor auxiliary equipment, including the Decay Heat Coolers. I l
'
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[X] Both
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-23, 7749-C-41A Supplement 1
. - .- _ _ - _ . _- - _ _ _ - _ _ _
.
'
Sheet 2 of 3
, ~ Data Sheet 2
'
III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Struthers Wells Corporation (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) ' V. Vibration Input.
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Fiqures II-j2A,B,C
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.20 g)
! S/S = 0.300 F/B = 1.60a V= 0.90g VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
; [ ] No ! 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt 'No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
_ ll
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
, i
- 10. Other tests perfornied (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1 i
.
.-. -- _
. . ..e, , . - --,,n.. --+
- Sh:et 3 of 3 Data Sheet 2 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A l 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] 10
[X] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [X] Computer Codes: ANSYS Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 0 to 102 Hz., No. Modes 9
[X] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [X] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for 'the damping used: Table II-l
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Supports modeled as beams with correct section properties
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a)
- 10,350 13,300
- Anchor bolts shear stress 10,840 27,000
- Base of support bearing stress *
- Not available from the analysis Effect Upon Functional Max. Deflection Location Operability B.
N/A Supplement 1 l ! ! _ _ ~_
*
..
Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 3
, Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
'
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR ,/
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Emergency Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Day Tanks
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] BOP
- 2. Model Number: N/A Quantity: 2
- 3. Vendor: Richmond Engineering Company
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Horizontal cylindrical tank
- b. Dimensions 15'l x 8.5' Dia
- c. Weight 11,500 lbs. empty, 59.500 lbs. full
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building. Area 6 Elevation 595 Feet i
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X ] Bolt (No. 16 , Size 3/4" ) I
[ ] Weld (Length ) []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
ALL: 423.5 Hz F/B: 28.6 Hz L 224.7 Hz
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provides one day supply of diesel fuel oil for Emergency Diesel Generator
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown l
[X] Both assuming offsite power is not I available i
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-129, 7749-C-41A l I
1 Supplement 1 i __. _
'
- Sht:t 2 of 3 Data Sheet 3 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test:
Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Richmond Engineerino Company '. (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Fiaures II-30A.B,C
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.2g) 0.528g N-S (TK.2) 0.669 N-S (TK.1)
S/S = 0.50950 E-W (TK.1) F/B = 0.63a E-W (TK.2) V= 0.49a VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ){]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1 i
! -- . _ _
- ___
Sh et 3 of 3
*
. Data Sheet 3 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete: N/A
- 1. Description of Test including Results:
- 2. Method of Analysis
[X] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [x] 1D
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
Static Analysis used. Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [X] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamir Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [x] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-l Free end cantilever using saddle properties ;
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) l or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) A.
** 31,639* 26,757 **
Circumferential Saddle Loaas on Bending Stress Shell Portion at Horn of in Saddle l Saddle _
' Foundation Bolts Shear Seismic 6977 6977 62,456 7.95 l Foundation Bolts Tension Seismic
~
9326 9326 58,232 5.24
*See discussion in' report SEction VI,!aragraph 4.2.3
. .
**Not available from the analysis __ , _.
Effect Upon Functional
._ _
B. Max. Deflection Location , Operability
.
None ,
'-
..
. ,
' Supplement 1
.- -. -
l
. _ _ _ _
*
-
Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 4 ' Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Service Water Pumps & Motors
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] 80P
,
- 2. Model Number: VITX-SD-20X288HC Quantity: 3
- 3. Vendor: Goulds Pumps, Vertical Pump Division
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
.
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Vertical Centrifugal Two-Stage Pump
- b. Dimensions 29' Column; 66" High, Discharge Head; 72" High, Motor
- c. Weight Pump 7800 lbs.; Motor 8650 lbsj
- 6. Location: Building Intake Structure Elevation 576 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 12 , Size 1 3/8" )
[ ] Weld (Length ) []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Horizo tal. Vertical):
'H: Pump: 2.27, 18.04, 56.7, 117.5, 196.3, (sym. in , Pump: //.5 Hz each direction) Motor & Head (N-S):11.96,213.5,711.3 V: Motor: 35.0 Hz Motor & Head (E-W):12.50 224.9,733.0
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provide cooling water to the Component Cooling Water Heat Exchangers, and provide backup water supply to the Auxiliary Feedwater Pe.aps,
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[ X] Both
- 10. Pertingqt Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-45, 7749-C-41A
..
.
.
Supplement 1
-
.,
*
- Sheet 2 of 3 Data Sheet 4
.
III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Perry H. Brown Consultina Engineer (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Fiqures II-34A.B,C
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.2g)
S/S = .82. 70. 241. 251F/B = .82.1.56. 364. 364 V = .205 Motor analyzed using 4.0g Horizontal and 3.0g Vertical VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Mi:lti-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
.
- 10. Other. tests performed (such as fragility test, including results): j l
-
1 l Supplement 1
-- - .
_
*
. Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 4 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ X] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ X] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ X] Compu'er Codes: Goulds' Programs, equivalent to " STRESS" Frequency Raige and No. of modes considered: 4 Modes Min.
[ ] Hand Calctlations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [X] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-l
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Base mounted-evaluated sorina constant !
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Strest (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a)
- 24,025 28,728
- Anchor Bolts Base to Floor
- 23,518 29,700
- Pump Base Floor Level -
All other components have calculated stresses which are under the allowables by a wider margin.
*Not available from the analysis Effect Upon Functional Max. Deflection Location Operability B.
Shaft Packing Area None Supplement 1 l
- - -
_ l
. _ . - '
Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 5 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Turbines
- 1. Scope: ! ] NSSS [X] B0P
- 2. Model Number: GS-2 Quantity: 2
- 3. Vendor: Terry Steam Turbine Company
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Single-Stage Split casing steam turbine
,
- b. Dimensions 5'-7"L x 5'-2"W x 3'6"H
- c. Weight Turbine 2.800 lbs., Trio & Throttle Valve 962 lbs.
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building, Area 7 f
Elevation GEC Fact
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )
{ ] Weld (Length ) [X] Bolted to Aux. Feed. Pump baseplate, see Data Sheet 1B
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Froat/Back, Vertical):
ALL: >100 Hz F/B: >100 Hz V: >100 Hz ,
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Steam turbine drive for Auxiliary Feedwater Pump (see Data Sheet 1B)
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[X] Both assuming non-seismic equipment is not available.
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-36, 7749-C-41 Supplement 1
. _
. . , _ - . - .
' .
Shast 2 of 3 Data Sheet 5 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Keith, Feibusch Associates (name of Ccmpany or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (atta.ch the graphs): Figures II-31A,B,C
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.2g)
#
0.2299 required 0.212g required 0.198g required S/S = 1.50g used F/B = 1.50g used V = 0.480 used VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A ' [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1
-- - - -
-. _
.
*
. Sheet 3 of 3 Cata Sheet 5 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[X] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynam k Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [X] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of inodes considered: Riaid [ X] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining lynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other: N/A - Riaid (specify)
- 6. Damping: N/A Basis for the damping used: Rigid
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Anchor bolts in concrete, no credit ror concrete snear resistance capability
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Thrust Bearings Turbine 0.489 1.173 1.550 0.771 Shaft Kips Kips Kips All other components have calculated stresses which have higher margins of safety. Effect Upon Functional Max. Deflecticn Location Operability 8. Turbine Shaft .005" No effect. Supplement 1 1 e - -- n..
- - _ - - _ - - . ___ _ _ - _
~
- Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 6 ,
Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name L.) rated Water Storage Tank Scope:
'
- 1. [ ] NSSS [ X] B0P
l
- 2. Model Number: - Quantity: 1
l 3. Vendor: Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. ! 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model ho. of the ! devices included: N/A
Field-fabricated, vertical
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance right cylindrical tank
- b. Dimensions 47' Dia. x 44' Straight height
- c. Weight 550.000 Gal, capacity storace tank
- 6. Location: Building Yard. west of Aux Bldo-1 Elevation 585 Feet
!
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [ X] Bolt (No. 48 , Size 24" )
[ ] Weld (Length )
- []
j 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical): I ALL: 6.58 Hz. F/B: 6.58 Hz V: 13.06 Hz. i
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provides source of borated water for makeup _ i to primary system, refueling water storage, safety injection, containment spray l and spent fuel pool cooling.
!
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby, [X] Cold Shutdowg assumint non-seismic equipment
[ ] Both is not available.
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-C-34. 7749-C-41 i,
Supplement 1
.. . . . _ - - . - _ . _ . . _ , - _._ _ _ _ . _ ._._ _ _ . - _ . - - __
_ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
~ -
Sheet 2 of 3 Data Sheet 6 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Chicago Bridge & Iron Co. and Test and/or Analysis by Bechtel Power Corporation (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No. ) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Figures II-1 & II-2
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.29)
S/S = 0.21g F/B = 0.21g y= 0.229
'
VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[l
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Otner (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [-] Weld (Length ){]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
! !
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
l l
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
l Supplement 1 l __
. __-_
*
.
Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 6 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Analysis including Results: Desian loads due to_0.20a
,
SSE calculated and compared to oriainal desian and code allowables substantiating adequacy of tank desian.
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [X] Dynamic Analysis: [X] Time-History [X] Dasponse Spectrum ,
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [X] 20 [ ] 10 1
[ ] Finite Element [X] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution Bechtel Standard Programs: Model Analysis (CE-917), spectral
- 4. [X] Computer Codes: Analysis (CE-918), Time-History Analysis (CE-920). and Response Spectra Analysis (CE-921).
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: to 33 Hz. (6 Dearees of Freedom) { ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [X] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 5% Basis for the damping used: Bolted steel structure
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Soil structure interaction
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governina Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress .( c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Axial (Longitudinal) Ring #1 3523 3637 18,500 4.22 Stress Circumferential Ring #3 3076 12,972 18,500 1.80 (Lateral) Stress Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Location Operability 0.139" Lateral Top of Tank None Supplement 1
. ..
.
O Sheet I n( 3 Data Sheet 9 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Decay Heat Removal Cooler
- 1. Scope: [X] NSSS [ ] B0P
- 2. Model Number: TEMA Type B-E-U Quantity: 2
- 3. Vendor: Atlas Industrial Mfg. Co.
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of 'he devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance U-Tube, Shell & Tube HX
- b. Dimensions Overall 64" x 19'-0"
- c. Weight Empty 17,500 lbs., Full of Water 28,800 lbs.
i
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building, Area 7 Elevation 545 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 8 , Size 1"O )
{ ] Weld (Length ) []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
ALL: >33 Hz F/B: >33 Hz V: >33 Hz
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Remove Decay Heat from Reactor Coolant System
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [X ] Cold Shutdown
[ ] Both
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: Seismic-1107/NSS-14/0470, 1
Mfg. Specs. - 1024/0769, CS-3-106, 1152/1069, CS-5-95 Supplement 1
. . . . _- .
- -- - - .. . _
. _ .
, I
!
,
- Sh:et 2 of 3 ,
i Data Sheet 9 l III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipt.'ent Qualification Method: Test: , Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: ' Test and/or Analysis by A+1as and B&W (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Fiaures II-l & II-2
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (basedon0.2g) 0.20g required 0.20g required 0.209 required S/S = 0.255a used F/B = 0.264a used V = 0.222g used VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A
[ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat i1
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1
-- . _ . _
*
,
Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 9 , VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Completa:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [X] Response Spectrum ,
- 3. Model Type: [ X] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] 1D
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ y Computer Codes: STALUM Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: 1 to 100.100 Modes
,
! [ ] Hand Calculations : j
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [X) SRSS '
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-l
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Yes
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) I or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) B&W evaluated the new response curves to determine applicable loads. The new loads were considerably less than those used by Atlas, and the Atlas original calculations were not altered. Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Location Operability N/A N/A Supplement 1
, . .
- -. -
. -. ~
*
. Shtet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 10 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Typ_e:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Decay Heat Removal Pump & Motor
- 1. Scope: [X] NSSS [ ] B0P
- 2. Model Number: 10 x 12 x 21 "KIM" Quantity: 2
- 3. Vendor: B&W Canada Ltd./ Westinghouse
,
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Horizontal Centrifugal
- b. Dimensions 48" x 116" x 55" High
- c. Weight 8270 lbs.
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building, Area 7 1
Elevation 545 Feet :
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Solt (No. 8 , Size 3/4" 0) i
[ ] Weld (Length ) {]
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
(Not calculated, see Para. VII.1 on Sheet 3) ALL: F/B: V:
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Removes Decay Heat during cooldown and accident conditions
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [X ] Cold Shutdown
[ ] Both
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: Seismic - 1107/0469, Mfg. Specs. - 1130/0369, CS-3-106,1152/1069, CS-5-95 Supplement 1
_ _ _ _ _
*
. Sheet 2 of 3 Data Sheet 10 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Babcock & t!ilcox Co. (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Figures II-l & II-2
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: See Para. VII.i Used 1.6g Horizontal and 0.8g-Vertical S/S = F/B = V=
VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1
-- - - - . . -_ .
._ _ _ _ . ___ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
*
.
Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 10 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then P.omplete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A The attachment bolts for the pump & motor assembly were analyzed usina the Deak or tne response spectra curves as statically applied loads at the C.G. of each component (pump, motor and base). 1.6G Horizontal & 0.8G Vertical used.
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [X] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] 10
[ ] Finite Element [X] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [X] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [X] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-l
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Simple SuDDort
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress M - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Bolt Stress Pump to Nozzle Loads 3600 6300 25,000 5.19 , Ease Plus SSE i Bolt Stress Base to Nozzle Loads 13,200 21.100 36,000 1.13 Foundation Plus SSE Bolt Stress Motor to SSE 9,400 9,400 25,000 1.66 , Frame Effect Upon Functional Max. Deflection Location Operability B. N/A Supplement 1
.. . - . - - . - . - . . - . - . , , - - . - . . - . - - . . . . -
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ -
'
- Shtet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 11 Qualification Summary of Equipment i
I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Comoonent Name Decay Heat Removal Suction valves HV-DHil and HV-0H12
- 1. Scope: [X] N5SS [ ] BOP
- 2. Model Number: Velan No. P-35216 Quantity: 2 ;
- 3. Vendor: Velan (Valve Co.) Engineering Co.
l
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the I devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Motor-operated Gate Valve ;
- b. Dimensions 12" diameter valve
- c. Weight 4555 lbs. (Approx.)
- 6. Location: Building Containment, Area 9 Elevation 560 Feet !
i ,
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [.] Bolt (No. ., Size ) I
{ $ Weld (Length 4U in. ) l []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
(Not calculated, conservative accelerations used, see Para. VII.A) ALL: F/B: V:
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Two valves in series, from Reactor Coolant System to Decay Heat Removal System
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby D(] Cold Shutdown i
[ ] Both
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications:
l l
Supplement 1 _
- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - _ _ _ _
*
.
Sheet 2 of 3 Data Sheet 11 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ ] Yes [ ] No Inside Containment IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Velan Engineering Co. * (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Used 3.0a Horiz. & Vert.
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: See Para. VII.8A
! S/S = F/B = V= VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
{ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ } Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1 _ -. .
-. - .. - - .
- _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _
~
.
. Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 11 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test ircluding Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ 9 Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [ l 1D
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [X] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses:
[[ ]] Other: Absolute SumN/A[ ] SRSS (specify)
- 6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Valve and operator were analyzed to withstand 3.0g horizontally and vertically acting simultaneously, in addition to normal operating load. Analysis shows that stresses are all within allowables. Effect Upon Functional Max. Deflection Location Operability B. Supplement 1 J
. . - _ _ _ _ _ . _ ___ * .
Shest 1 of 3 Data Sheet 12 Qualification Summary of Equipme,nt I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Tyge:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Steam Inlet Valve HV-MS106
- 1. Scepe: [ ] NSSS [X ] B0P
- 2. Model Number: Velan No. B14-254B-2TS Quantity: 1
- 3. Vendor: Velan (Valve Co.) Engineering Co.
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Motor-operated Gate Valve
- b. Dimensions 6" diameter valve
- c. Weight 1200 lbs. (Approx.)
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building. Area 7 Elevation 624.5 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )
[X] Weld (Length 21" ) []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
32.7 Hz. for the valve & operator , ALL: F/B: V: 1
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Valve is in the line which supplies steam i to the Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Turbine
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[ X] Both l 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-212 1 i Supplement 1
* .
Sheet 2 of 3 Data Sheet 12 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Velan Engineering Co. (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No. )
V. Vibration Input: l 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Used 3.0g Horiz. & Vert.
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: See Para. VII.8.A S/S = F/B = V=
VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
, , Supplement 1 !
._
- -. -_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _
\
l
} *
. 1 Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 12 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [ ] 1D
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: [ ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses:
[[ ]] Other: Absolute Sum N/A[ ] SRSS (specify)
- 6. Damping: Basis for the damping used:
- 7. Support Considerations in the model:
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Valve and operator were analyzed to withstand 3.09 in any direction, in addition to normal operating load. Analysis shows that stresses are all within allowables. The maximum acceleration which the valve and operator will be subjected to in the installed piping system is less than 1.0g in any direction. Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Location Operability Supplement 1
. .
* .
Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 21 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Component Cooling Water Pumps & Motors
- 1. Scope: [ ] NJSS [X] BOP
- 2. Model Number: 3415M, Size 14x16-22 Quantity: 3
- 3. Vendor: Goulds Pumps. Inc.
'
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A S. Physical Description a. Appearance Horizontal centrifugal pump
- b. Dimensions 111"L x 33"W x 63"H
- c. Weight 11.404 lbs.
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building. Area 7 Elevation 585 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 8 , Size 1" )
[ ] Weld (Length ) []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
ALL: 39.1 Hz. F/B: 24.4 Hz. V: higher than 39.1 Hz.
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provide cooling water for reactor auxiliary equipment, including the Decay Heat Coolers,
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[X] Both
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-46, 7749-C-41A l
l
,
;
Supplement 1
*
.
Sheet 2 of 3 Data Sheet 21 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ X) Yes [ ] No , IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X ' Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Mcdonald Engineering Analysis Compa Report No. ME-727 (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Figures II-32A,B,C
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.2g) 0.264g required 0.70g required 0.35g required .
S/S = 1.09 used F/B = 1.09 used V= 1.0g used Motor analyzed using 4.09 Horizontal and 3.0g Vertical VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
[ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
,
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length ,) [ ] _
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Appl A
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
i 1 ! Supplement 1
. . _
_
*
. Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 21 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Tg: t and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ ] Equivalent Static Analysis [ X] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History to obtain frequencies [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Modei Type: [ ] 30 [ ] 2D [ ] 10 (X) Multi-degree of freedom beam b ] Finite Element [ X] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution connected model
- 4. [ X] Computer Codes: ICES-STRUDL Frequency Range and No. of niodes considered: 24 Hz. lowest, 39 Hz. second only
. 1 mode active in N-S dir., only 1
[ ] Hand Calculations mode active in E-W dir.
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [X] Absolute Sum [ ] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-1
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: Pump bedplate assumed to be bolted to foundation with pre-tightened bolts.
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Pump hold-down End of Seismic plus 12,130 28,432 32,000 0.294 tensile bolts 1/8" pump plus nozzle 2,683 2,747 16,000 4.940 shear-diam. casing / plus normal pedestal junction Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Location Operability 0.009" Imp &ller at centerline No effect, since 0.011" clearance shaft & impeller exceeds impeller deflection intersectkn Supplement 1
- a Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 22 Qualification Summary of Equipment I. Plant Name: Davis-Besse 1 Type:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Component Cooling Water Surge Tank
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] B0P
~
- 2. Model Number: N/A Quantity: 1
- 3. Vendor: Brown Minneapolis
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Horizontal Cylindrical Tank
- b. Dimensions 5'-6"0.D. x 15'-0" Long,
- c. Weight 30.430 lbs. (approx.) full of water 1
- 6. Location: Building Auxiliary Building. Area 7 Elevation 623 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [X] Bolt (No. 8 , Size 1" )
[ ] Weld (Length ) []
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
ALL: 155 Hz. F/B: 21 Hz. V: 155 Hz.
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
Provides water reservoir, surge capability and static pressure for the Component Coolina Water System.
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[X] Both
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-103. 7749-C-41 A Supplement 1
. ._ _
.. . ._-. _ . . - _ .- .- -_
*
.
Sheet 2 of 3 i Data Sheet 22 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [X] Yes [ ] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X , Combination of Test and Analysis:
- Test and/or Analysis by Bechtel Power CorDoration
' (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.)
- V. Vibration Input:
,
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Figures II-33A,B,C 1
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.3g)
S/S = 0.46g F/B = 0.60g V= 0.330 VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency
- [ ] sine beat 4
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other i (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
- 5. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs)
{ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
,
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
'
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
> Supplement 1
. . . -. _
,- _. -. - -. . - _ . -_ . - . - .-
;
*
,
Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 22 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete: ,
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [X] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [X] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes: N/A Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: Up to 155 Hz.
[X] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [X ] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 4% Basis for the damping used: Table II-1 (Welded
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: As-built
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) i or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Compression Saddle
- 697 15,000
- Tension Shell * -13,794 23,100
- Compression Shell
- 592 14,227
- Cross-bracing between Saddles
- 6,445 12,100
- Tension Foundation Bolts
- 6,972 22,000
- Shear Foundation Bolts
- 4,750 10,800
- Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Location Operability Longitudinal None
*Not available from the analysis Supplement 1
_ -
.
a Sheet 1 of 3 Data Sheet 23 Qualification Summary of Eauipment I. Plant Naine: Davis-Besse 1 Tyge:
- 1. Utility: Toledo Edison PWR J
- 2. NSSS: B&W 3. A/E: Bechtel BWR II. Component Name Emergency Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Storage Tanks
- 1. Scope: [ ] NSSS [X] B0P
- 2. Model Number: N/A Quantity: 2
- 3. Vendor: Richmond Engineering Company
- 4. If the component is a cabinet or panel, name and model No. of the devices included: N/A
- 5. Physical Description a. Appearance Horizontal cylindrical tank (Buried)
- b. Dimensions 50'L x 12' Dia,
- c. Weight 62.750 lbs. empty
- 6. Location: Building Yard Elevation Grade: 585 Feet
- 7. Field Mounting Conditions [ ] Bolt (No. , Size )
[ ] Weld (Length ) [X] Buried underground
- 8. Natural Frequencies in Each Direction (Side / Side, Front /Back, Vertical):
Not applicable since equivalent static analysis was used with peak values I of acceleration (1.29 Horiz., 0.8g Vert. used).
.... 1
- 9. a. Functional
Description:
~ ' Store diesel fuel oil for the '
Emergency Diesel Generators
- b. Is the equipment required for [ ] Hot Standby [ ] Cold Shutdown
[X ] Both assuming offsite power is not available.
- 10. Pertinent Reference Design Specifications: 7749-M-129A. 7749-C-41 Supplement 1 l t I
.. _ _ _ _ _
- 4 .
Sh:et 2 of 3 Data Sheet 23 III. Is Equipment Available for Inspection in the Plant: [ ] Yes [X] No IV. Equipment Qualification Method: Test: Analysis: X Combination of Test and Analysis: Test and/or Analysis by Richmond Engineering Company (name of Company or Laboratory & Report No.) V. Vibration Input:
- 1. " Revised" Required Response Spectra (attach the graphs): Fioures II-1 & II-2
- 2. Required Acceleration in Each Direction: (based on 0.20g)
(used 1.29 Horizontal and 0.89 Vertical) S/S = 0.73q F/B = 0.730 V= 0.700 VI. If Qualification by Test, then Complete: N/A [ ] random
- 1. [ ] Single Frequency [ ] Multi-Frequency: [ ] sine beat
[]
- 2. [ ] Single Axis [ ] Multi-Axis
- 3. No. of Qualification Tests: OBE SSE Other (specify)
- 4. Frequency Range:
S. TRS enveloping RRS using Multi-Frequency Test [ ] Yes (Attach TRS & RRS graphs) [ ] No
- 6. Input g-level Test at S/S = F/B = V=
- 7. Laboratory Mounting:
- 1. [ ] Bolt (No. , Size ) [ ] Weld (Length )[]
- 8. Functional operability verified: [ ] Yes [ ] No [ ] Not Applicable
- 9. Test Results including modifications made:
- 10. Other tests performed (such as fragility test, including results):
Supplement 1 _ _-,
__
, . .
Sheet 3 of 3 Data Sheet 23 VII. If Qualification by Analysis or by the Combination of Test and Analysis, then Complete:
- 1. Description of Test including Results: N/A
- 2. Method of Analysis
[ ] Static Analysis [ X] Equivalent Static Analysis [ ] Dynamic Analysis: [ ] Time-History [ ] Response Spectrum
- 3. Model Type: [ ] 3D [ ] 2D [ X] 10
[ ] Finite Element [ ] Beam [ ] Closed Form solution
- 4. [ ] Computer Codes:
Frequency Range and No. of modes considered: N/A [ ] Hand Calculations
- 5. Method of Combining Dynamic Responses: [ ] Absolute Sum [x] SRSS
[ ] Other: (specify)
- 6. Damping: 3% Basis for the damping used: Table II-1
- 7. Support Considerations in the model: N/A
- 8. Critical Structural Elements:
Governing Load (a) (b) (c) or Response Seismic Total Stress (c) - (b) A. Identification Location Combination Stress Stress Allowable (a) Heads Knuckle SSE plus 6,828 10,767 12,056 0.189 Region Pressure Effect Upon Functional B. Max. Deflection Location Operability N/A Supplement 1 1
.,
, VII. CONCLUSIONS
- 1. The previous sections of this report present the results of an intensive evaluation of the adequacy of systems required to accomplish safe shutdown of the reactor and continued shutdown heat removal in the event of an SSE with an acceleration of 0.20g.
- 2. This evaluation included an assessment of components, selected by the NRC Staff, representative of those necessary to achieve shutdown. It also included all stress problems for those piping systems required for shutdown. Further, it included randomly selected piping supports and ventilation ductwork supports.
- 3. In all cases, adequate margin was demonstrated such that the accomplishment of safe shutdown and continued shutdown heat I removal is assured.
- 4. The factors of safety presented in this evaluation have addi-tional inherent margins built-in as a result of either con-servative analytical approaches or the use of allowable stresses (code or allowable) which have within themselves additional factors of safety. Examples of these inherent margins are dis-cussed below for piping systems and piping and ventilation duct-work supports.
4.1 Piping Systems. Section IV, Paragraph 1.5 discusses how using a scale factor results in conservative seismic and total stress values. To show the conservatism of this approach three sets of stress cases were rerun using the complete computer reanalysis. These are:
- a. Stress cases where the margin factor was not computed since by using the scale factor method it was obvious that an overstressed condition would result (i.e. margin factor
>1.0) (31 of 50 cases).
- b. Stress cases where the margin factor was computed using the i scale factor method but exceeded the allowable stress for the revised response spectra (9 of 50 cases).
- c. Stress cases where the margin factor computed by the scale factor method was between 0.9 and 1.0 (10 of 50 cases).
Table VII-1 shows the results of the comparisons for all fifty stress cases reviewed. For this evaluation, the average margin factors showed approximately a 50 percent reduction after computer reanalysis. On an average basis this indicates that the scale factor method of analysis has an inherent factor of safety of ; two. j 4.2 Piping and Ventilation Supports. These are discussed in Sec-tion IV, Paragraph 2.0, and Section V, Paragraph 2.0, respectively. The margin factor or interaction values for the most stressed VII-1 Supplement 1
%e members (the latter being reported for anchor bolts) are con-servative. For structural steel the allowable stresses were based on th AISC code which has built-in safety factors since they vary between 45 percent to 75 percent of the steel's yield stress, depending upon various parameters defining the con-figuration of structure and types of loads applied.
For standard catalog (non-engineered) items, i.e., pipe saddles, clamps, clevis, etc. , the manufacturer's allowable capacity is based on a minimum factor of safety of five compared to the ultimate strength. For engineered components, i.e., sway struts, snubbers, etc., the applied loads are based upon a faulted loading condition while the manufacturer's allowable is based upon the normal loading codition. This also provides an additional factor 1 of safety. In the case of anchor bolts, the manufacturer's allowables are one-fourth or one-fifth of the ultimate strength. The twelve pipe supports identified in Table IV-5 were reanalyzed considering the above additional conservatisms to determine a revised margin or interaction value. This reanalysis has shown that considering these conservatisms results in a reduction of the margin factor or interaction value by 22 percent to 80 percent. Of the twelve problems reanalyzed the reduction for eight of them fell in the 75 percent to 80 percent range. ! l l VII-2 Supplement 1 l l l i
O TABLE VII-1 PIPING SYSTEMS SAFETY MARGIN COMPARISON Average Ratio of Ratio of Margin Factors
- Category of Number Margin Factor Avg. M.F. Scale Factor Method / Computer Analysis Stress Problem of Using Using Scale Problems Scale Computer Factor Range and Number of Problems in Range Factor Analysis Method Method Computer Analysis 1.0-1.5 1.5-2.0 2.0-3.0 3.0-4.0 4.0-5.0 5.0-7.69 Problems for which a margin factor was calculated using the scale factor method (Paragraphs 4.1.b 19 .866 .382 2.27 3 3 7 6 _ _
and 4.1.c) (Lowest (Highest 1.02) 4.0) Problems which did not have a margin factor calculated using the scale factor method, but in all cases it exceeds 1.0 (Paragraph 4.1.a) 31 >1.0 .508 1.97 8 7 9 1 4 2 (Lowest (Highest 1.14) 7.69) 50 >.949 .465 2.04 11 10 16 7 4 2 TOTAL g>
- NOTE: For the 31 problems that did not have a margin factor calculated using the qj scale factor method, a conservative value of 1.0 was used in the calculation.
X R a - _ _ _ _}}