ML100680735

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:03, 13 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Meeting Slides
ML100680735
Person / Time
Site: Ginna Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/18/2010
From:
Reactor Projects Branch 1
To:
Shared Package
ML100470419 List:
References
Download: ML100680735 (11)


Text

££L0890011W

~U.S.NRC NRC Strategic Plan Goals United Strite. Nuclea.r Regulritory Commission Protttctmg People tmJ the E"flirtmmmt ft Safety - Ensure adequate protection of public health and safety and the environment 4ia Security - Ensure adequate protection in the secure use and management of radioactive materials

~U.S.NRC NRC Ann uaI Assessme nt Sum mary United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission (It Ginna operated the plant safely and in a manner that preserved the public health and safety and protected the environment during the assessment period.

~ Ginna was in the Degraded Cornerstone column of the NRCs Action Matrix.

(t Ginna had a moderate degradation in safety performance.

~U.S.NRC NRC Inspection Activities United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Protecting Ptmple anJ

  • E"viro""""t Ginna for 2009

~ 5800 hours0.0671 days <br />1.611 hours <br />0.00959 weeks <br />0.00221 months <br /> of inspection and related activities

~ 2 resident inspectors on site

~ 10 regional inspections

~ 2 major team inspection

~ Special Inspection Team for the Turbine Driven Auxiliary Feed Water (TDAFW) pump issues

~ Fire Protection Team Inspection

NRC Significance Threshold Summary ~~!-!.§':~'Y~m~

Prot<<:ting AIopu anJ the Environmmt Performance Indicators (PI)

& , -~ Baseline Inspection

& White Requires additional NRC oversight 8 Requires more NRC oversight

~ Red Requires most NRC oversight Inspection Findings 8 Gre Very low safety issue e White Low to moderate safety issue 8 Substantial safety issue e Red High safety issue

~U.S.NRC Ginna Pis and Findings United States Nuclear Regulatory CommissIon Protet:tirlg Aopk muJtIHt E"uirrlnmnat January 1 through December 31, 2009

~ 1 White PI

~ 2 White inspection findings

~ 12 Green/Severity Level IV inspection findings

Summary of Safety Significant ~U.S.NRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Prot<<tmg Pttople I#II!l the Environment Inspection Findings and Pis at Ginna

~ 1st gtr '09: White Finding for inadequate implementation of the Preventative Maintenance program for the TDAFW pump

~ 3rd gtr '09: White PI due to system reliability issues associated with TDAFW failures

~ 4th gtr '09: White Finding for inadequate corrective actions to prevent reoccurrence of TDAFW iss

~U.S.NRC NRC Action Matrix United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Pruteaing People tmJ the Enflirrm:numl Licensee

Response

Regulatory

Response

II Degraded \

Cornerstone I Multiple Repetitive Degraded Unacceptable Performance Cornerstone All Inputs are 1 or 2 White 2 White or1 Multiple Yellow Overall Green; Inputs; Yellow Input; Inputs or 1 Red Unacceptable Cornerstone Cornerstone Cornerstone Input; Cornerstone Performance; Objectives Objectives Objectives Met wI Objectives Met wI Plants not Fully Met Fully Met Moderate Significant permitted to Degradation in) Degradation in Operate wlin this Safety Safety Performance Column; Performance Unacceptable Margin to Safety L----_~ '------5 '----~

e Increasing safety significance e Increasing NRC inspection efforts e Increasing NRC/Licensee management involvement e Increasing regulatory actions

~U.S.NRC NRC Plans for 2010 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commlulon Protect.ingPeople a:nJ the Envirrmmtmt

~ Supplemental and Team Inspections:

~ A supplemental inspection (95002) will ensure deficiencies with the TDAFW pump have been corrected

~ An independent spent fuel storage installation (lSFSI) inspection in May

~ A Problem Identification and Resolution (PI&R) inspection in May/June

~ A Component Design Basis Inspection (CDBI) in Oct/Nov

~U.S.NRC United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Prot<<:thJg hopu aNi the E"virrm:llllmt R. E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant Response and Remarks