ML17334B615
ML17334B615 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Cook |
Issue date: | 03/10/1997 |
From: | Fitzpatrick E INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
References | |
AEP:NRC:1040E, GL-87-02, GL-87-2, TAC-M69437, NUDOCS 9703170230 | |
Download: ML17334B615 (850) | |
Text
CATEGORY 1 REGULAT INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION STEM (RIDS)
ACCESSION NBR:9703170230 DOC.DATE: 97/03/10 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET FACIL:.50-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 50-316 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 2, Indiana M 05000316 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION FITZPATRICK,E. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana 6 Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
SUBJECT:
Forwards response to RAI re GL 87-02,including responses to nine items from NRC staff ! seismic evaluation work sheets. C DISTRIBUTION CODE: A025D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:
TITLE: Seismic Qualification of Equipment in Operating Plants A-46 GL-87 T
NOTES:
E RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL OGC/HDS2 1 1 PD3-3 PD 1 1 HICKMAN,J 1 1 0 INTERN : FILE CE 1 1 NRR/DE 1 1 DE/ECGB 1 1 NRR/DE/EMEB 2 2 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 1 NRR/DRPE/PD1-3 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRXB 1 1 EXTERNAL: NRC PDR 1 1 D
U NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM OWFN 5D-5(EXT. 415-2083) TO ELIMINATE YOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS FOR DOCUMENTS YOU DON'T NEED!
TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 13 ENCL 13
Indgana Mich!gan Power Company
~
500 CircIe Orive Buchanan, MI 491071395 INOlANSl MlCMGAN PQWM March 10, 1997 AEP: NRC: 1040E Docket Nos.: 50-315 50-316 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 RESPONSE TO NRC LETTER REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'S RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 87-02 (TAC NO. M69437)
By letter dated October 21, 1996, the NRC requested additional information regarding our January 30, 1996, response to generic letter 87-02. The following attachments contain the requested information.
Attachment No. 1 contains the responses to the nine items from the NRC staff Attachment No. 2 contains the sample seismic evaluation work sheets (SEWS) and anchorage calculations as requested in item 2 Attachment No. 3 contains the sample SEWS and anchorage calculations for tanks and heat exchangers as requested in item 5 Attachment No. 4 contains the seismic adequacy calculations for tanks 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32 as requested in item 6
Attachment No. 5 contains the SEWS and anchorage calculations for horizontal tanks and heat exchangers as requested in item 7 Attachment No. 6 contains the calculations for limited analytical reviews (LARs) of the cable and conduit raceways as requested in item 8 SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED BEFORE ME PP~j~
Vice President THIS IO ~ DAY OF Qd Notary t
Public 199,7 JI My Commission Expires vlb Attachments JAM NNSOW
'P703i70230 9703i0 NOTARY PUBUC,BERRIEN COUNY, Ml ADOCK 05000315 MYCOMMISSIONEXPIRES FEB. 10,1999 PDR P
r UUrg.g PDR D~g /
rrrrrrrrInrrrrrrgmrrI[ItrllrgrrgIrgfr
Ilil Ill ll>>
l I~
~I II
~ p I
'
\
J I
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission AEP: NRC: 1040E Page 2 CC A. A. Blind A. B. Beach MDEQ - DW 6c RPD NRC Resident Inspector J. R. Padgett
ATTACHMENT 1 TO AEP:NRC:1040E RESPONSES TO NRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONALINI"ORMATION(RAI)
RELATED TO COOK NUCLEAR PLANT'S RESPONSE TO GENERIC LETTER 87-02 (TAC NO M69437)
>)ozg ops
" ll r /
I
- r. J l'PaO. i tf9,"
RESPONSE TO THE USNRC REQUEST FOR ADDITIONALINFORMATION UNRESOLVED SAFETY ISSUE USI A-46 REVIEW FOR DONALD C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 & 2
%ith rcspcct to Section 2.2, page 2-2, discuss the engineering basis for using the In-Structure Response Spectra (ISRS) developed for the Diesel Generator Building to determine loads in the Auxiliary Building at Elevation 609 fcct, and provide the Diesel Generator Building and Auxiliary Building ISRS.
The basis for using the ISRS developed for the. diesel generator building to determine loads in the auxiliary building at elevation 609 feet is provided in the third full paragraph of page 2-2 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal. This paragraph states:
"The ISRS are not available at some of the floor elevations where safe shutdown equipment is located. When this is the case, either the ISRS for a higher elevation or the ISRS developed by a linear interpolation between existing ISRS may be used in the evaluation. In the case of the auxiliary building elevation 609 feet, since the interpolated ISRS are very close to the corresponding ISRS for the diesel generator building, the ISRS for the diesel generator building were used."
To further illustrate this basis, figure 1 shows a plot of four ISRS (SSE, 5% equipment damping) for the elevations in question. These spectra include the auxiliary building 587'nd 633'levations which are the elevations where developed spectra exist directly 'above and below the 609'levation, and the spectra at 609'n the diesel generator building. In addition to these spectra, a 609'uxiliary building spectra is provided that was generated by interpolating the spectral acceleration values at 587'nd 609'. The auxiliary building and diesel generator building share a common foundation mat. As shown in figure 1, there is essentially no difference between the diesel generator spectra at 609'nd the interpolated auxiliary building spectra at 609', and, therefore, there is no.engineering significance with regard to the load determination ifeither of these are used.
With regard to the diesel generator building and auxiliary building ISRS, the ISRS for all elevations of all buildings at Cook Nuclear Plant included in the USI A-46 evaluation for 2%
and 5% equipment damping have been provided in appendix 8 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal.
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Comparison of Selected Auxiliary Building FRS and 1.5xBS to Diesel Generator Building FRS at Elevation 609 feet- 5% Damping 1.50 Ql O 1.00 Q
Q O
O C
O 0.50 CL G9 0.00 0.1 10 50 Figure 609'ux Oteeel l ISRS for D.G. Building El 609'ompared Frequency (Hz) 609'nterpohted 1.5xBS to ISRS for Auxiliary Building El. 587', 609' 633' 5% Damping
Discuss key examples of designated "rigorously analyzed anchorages," (page 4-6) using hand calculations and ANCHOR4 sofhvarc package and provide copies of their engineering calculations. Also discuss a few cases of anchorage verification based on thc results of tug tests conducted and provide a description of the tests and applicable engineering justification for such an approach.
Table I provides a list of key examples of equipment items with varying levels of anchorage evaluations. These examples include "rigorously analyzed anchorages," comparisons to analyzed equipment items and judgments based on the anchorage inspection and in some cases judgments supplemented by tug tests. Copies of the completed seismic evaluation work sheets (SEWS), the analysis (ifapplicable) and the corresponding anchorage inspection sheets are included in attachment 2 of this response to the RAI for those items marked with a
- in table l. When comparison or judgment was used to satisfy the GIP anchorage criteria an appropriate description of the evaluation is documented in the notes of the SEWS. The anchorage inspections and installation testing performed for the Cook Nuclear Plant USI A-46 evaluations, discussed in greater detail in the response to RAI question 4, greatly exceed the requirements of the GIP. This provides greater confidence in the judgments made by the seismic review team (SRT) that capacity greatly exceeded demand when a formal anchorage calculation was not made.
A review of notes within the data base for each equipment item in the Cook Nuclear Plant USI A-46 effort was conducted in order to respond to this request'for additional information (RAI). Anchorage evaluations performed can be categorized as follows: a) a detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation was performed; b) a detailed hand calculation was performed; c) the anchorage was screened based on an anchorage evaluation on an identical item of equipment and anchorage or a worst case evaluation of a similar equipment item; or d) the SRT judged, based on the weight and anchorage of the equipment, that the anchorage obviously met the GIP screening criteria.
In some cases when method (d) was used, a tug test was performed. This was performed by an SRT member that would tug on the assembly in the weakest direction to a level of about two times the estimated weight of the item. The tug test from a practical standpoint was unnecessary due to the relative light weight and robust'anchorage of the equipment. Each anchorage evaluation whether detailed or by judgment was based on a detailed anchorage inspection and the SRT inspection. Items tug tested were in general light weight components.
Samples of detailed analysis performed by ANCHOR4 and by hand calculations are included with the sample SEWS in attachment 2. When judgment was used the basis for the judgment is included in the notes section of the SEWS. The detailed anchor inspection documentation is also included with each SEWS provided.
The engineering justification for the approach used for performing the anchorage evaluations is described in section 4.4, page 4-26 second paragraph of the Rev. 2 GIP. This paragraph states: "There are various combinations of inspections, analyses, and engineering judgment which can be used to verify the adequacy of equipment anchorage. The Seismic Capability Engineers should select the appropriate combination of elements for each anchorage
installation based on the information available. For example, a simple hand calculation may be sufficient for a pump which has only a few, very rugged, anchor bolts in a symmetrical pattern. On the other hand, at times it may be advisable to use one of the computer codes to determine the loads applied to a multi-cabinet motor control center if its anchorage is not symmetrically located." The anchorage evaluations used the appropriate combinations of elements necessary to determine that any screened equipment met the GIP criteria.
Table 1 provides a brief description of the anchorage evaluation performed. There is a good cross section of examples that include all equipment classes on the Cook Nuclear Plant safe shutdown equipment list (SSEL) (1 to 20) and categories of anchorage evaluations performed.
Examples of class 0 and 21 anchorage evaluations are provided in response to RAI questions 5 and 7.
Table 1 Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipment ID Anchorage Evaluation Performed 1-AB-N Three section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-ABD-A* Six section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-ABV-A Six section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-AM-D Eight section MCC. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-EZC-D Eleven section MCC (including attached EZC-BS).
Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-11A Large Multisection 600V Switchgear. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-52-RTB Reactor Trip Breaker Units composed of 4 breaker vertical sections. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-21B Large 'ultisection 600V Switchgear. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-T21B Large Multisection 4KV Switchgear... Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-T11A Large Multisection 4KV Switchgear. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-CRID-III-CVT Small Transformer 4'-6" x 2'-6" x 2'-4". Weight estimated at 1180 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
I-TR11B Large supply transformer. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-CRID-I-CVT* Small Transformer 4'-6" x 2'-6" x 2'-4". Weight estimated at 1180 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
Table I (Continued)
Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipment ID Anchorage Evaluation Pcrformcd 2-TR-ELSC Small Transformer 20" D x 30" W x 36" H. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-PP-10W* .900 GPM pump. 'etailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.
1-PP-4 440 GPM pump. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.
1-PP-50W Large Pacific Pump with a weight of 20,000 lbs. Detailed
, ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-QT-111-AB Small 90 GPM Pump - weight about 800 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
12-PP-31S 100 GPM pump - 2076 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.. Item was designated an outlier until nozzle loads are defined.
2-PP-26N Pacific Pump - total weight 5500 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.
2-PP-3E Large Ingersoll Rand Pump - 7935 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
2-PP-46-4* Small Goulds Pump - 511 lbs. Nozzle loads judged to be small by SRT. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation (four 5l8" anchors) and the walkdown.
2-PP-82S Small Goulds Pump - 214 lbs. Nozzle loads judged to be small by. SRT. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation (four 5/8" anchors) and the walkdown.
2-QT-106-CD1 Small Worthington Pump - 135 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed induding nozzle loadings on the suction arid discharge piping.
1-PP-7W Large vertical pump with a 45'ong vertical casing.
Screening of anchorage based on a review of existing qualification that included an anchorage evaluation.
2-PP-9W Vertical pump. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed'including nozzle loadings on the suction and discharge piping.
1-HV-AFP-8RE-2 Small light weight fan - 154 lbs. Anchorage accepted by judgment aAer a review of the anchorage drawings.
Table 1 (Continued) of Anchorage Evaluations
'xamples Class Kquipmcnt ID Anchorage Evaluation Performed 1-HV-AFP-M1* Medium size fan - 500 lbs, mounted with 16 1/2" steel to steel bolts. Anchorage accepted by judgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.
1-HV-AFP-Xl Small light weight fan - 287 lbs, mounted with 12 3/8" steel to steel bolts. Anchorage accepted by judgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.
I-HV-CEQ-I Large fan unit. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
12-HV-ES W-7* Large fan unit. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
12-HU-ESW-1 Large fan unit similar to 12-HV-ESW-7. Anchorage screened based on comparison to ANCHOR4 evaluation for 12-HV-ESW-7.
2-HU-AFP-BRE-1 Small light weight fan - 154 lbs. Anchorage accepted by judgment after a review of the anchorage drawings.
2-HV-DGS-1 Large fan - 1531 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
9 2-HV-DGX-1 Large fan - 1100 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
10 1-HV-ACRA-1 Cooler unit with a weight estimate of 3000 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
10 1-HV-AES-1 (FLT) Large filter unit - 24,000 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-AFW* Small wall mounted panel (36" H x 20" W x 6" D).
Panel estimated to weigh 50 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description and a 100 lb. tug test.
14 1-BCTC-AB Panel 38" W x 60" H x 9" D. Weight estimated at 300 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
14 1-CRCD Rack 38" W x 84" H x 9" D - Weight estimated at 400 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
14 1-ELSC Small wall mounted panel (36" H x 20" W x 6" D).
Panel estimated to weight 50 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description and a 100 lb. tug test.
14 1-ELSCX Small distribution panel 57" H x 22" W x 6" D.
Weight estimated at 370 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
Table 1 (Continued)
Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipment ID Anchorage Evaluation Performed 14 1-MDAB Wall mounted switchboard 38" W x 84" H x 9" D.
Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-MCAB.
- 14. 1-TDAB Wall mounted switchboard 38" W x 84" H x 9" D.
Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-MCAB.
14 1-VDCD-1 8. 2 Pair of 22" W x 38" H x 7" D distribution panels.
Anchorage accepted by comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-VDAB-1 (Identical Construction).
14 2-AFWX Wall mounted panel - 57" H x 22" W x 6" D. Weight estimated at 100 to 150 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description and a tug test.
14 2-BATT-N-SH Wall mounted Battery Shunt. Weight estimated at 100 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after a review of the anchorage description, the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-BATT-N-SH and a tug test.
14 2-DCN Switchboard bolted to a steel rack. Anchorage screened based on comparison to the ANCHOR4 analysis for similar panel 1-DCN.
14 2-VDAB-1 & 2 Pair of 22" W x 38" H x 7" D distribution panels.
Anchorage screened based on comparison to the detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for similar panel 1-VDAB-1.
15 2-BATT-AB* Substantial 2 - step battery rack. Anchorage evaluation based on a review of existing anchorage and recent modifications made to the racks.
16 1-BC-AB1 Battery Charger 3025 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
16 1-CIUD-I-INV Inverter 2'-5" x 3' 6'-3" - 2100 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
16 2-BC-A Battery Charger 32" L x 24" W x 46" H. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
16 2-D GAB-INV Inverter 28" x 28" x 57". Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
1-OME-150-AB* Large Diesel Generator. Anchorage capacity for 2-OME-150-CD indicated an additional margin of 36.
Anchorage screened based on comparison to that evaluation.
Table 1 (Continued)
Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipment ID Anchorage Evaluation Performed 18 1-CLI-113 Small transmitter - 27 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
18 1-CPS-317 Small 9" x 9" panel. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
1& 1-CPS-410 Rack supported device. One detailed ANCHOR4 analysis was performed to encompass 1-CPS-410, 8c 420 and 2-CPS-410 Ec, 420.
18 1-MPP-232 Small pressure transmitter - 35 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
18 1-NPP-151 Small pressure transmitter - 24 lbs. including bracket.
Anchorage screened by judgment aAer review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
1& 2-8LI-110 Instrument on small, stiff bracket. Assembly weighs less than 100 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and
,the walkdown.
18 2-CLI-113 Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
18 2-CPS-410 Small device on a rack. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
18 2-FFI-210 Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
18 2-IFI-311 Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
18 2-IFI-51 Transmitter bolted to support composed of a small diameter pipe. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
Table 1 (Continued)
Examples of Anchorage Evaluations Class Equipmcnt ID Anchorage Evaluation Performed 18 2-XRY-153 Small rack consisting of a small panel bolted to P1000 unistruts. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the walkdown.
19 1-VTS-356 Light weight component - 5 lbs. Anchorage screened by judgment after review of the anchorage inspection documentation, the walkdown and a tug test.
20 2-Al 1* Relay panel included in a section of panel from A6 to A15. Weight estimate of entire panel 3000 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
20 1-ACRA-2 Stand alone panel 24" L x 24" D x 84" H. Weight estimated @ 700 lbs. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
20 1-CAS Large Control Panel 24'-6" L x 6'-3" D x 7'. Hand calculation performed on the weak link in the anchorage system and found to be more than adequate.
20 1-D GAB Large Control Panel in Diesel Generator Room. Detailed ANCHOR4'evaluation performed.
20 1-GR-1 Relay Rack 6'-6" L x 8'. Weight estimated 300 lbs./lineal foot of rack. Hand calculation performed on the weak link in the anchorage system and found to be more than adequate.
20 1-HSD1 Walkthrough cabinet 12' x 6' x 8'. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
20 1-NRI-23-ISO Heavy duty rack. Anchorage judged adequate based on review of the anchorage inspection documentation, the walkdown and the obvious ruggedness and installation of this new design.
20 2-CG2 Control cabinet 5'-6" L x 2'-6" W x 7'-7" H.
Anchorage screened based on comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for similar panel 1-RPC-1.
20 2-PRZ Item is included in a Control Panel with two other items.
Total panel is 12'-3" L x 8'. Weight estimated at 300 Ibs/lineal ft. Anchorage screened based on comparison to the ANCHOR4 evaluation performed for 1-SG, 20 2-RPS-A Relay cabinet 90" W x 30" D x 90" H, welded to embedded steel. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
20 2-SWRR Cabinet 16' x 8' x 18" D. Weight estimated at 300 lbs/lineal ft. Detailed ANCHOR4 evaluation performed.
- 3) Table 4.5 shows that the 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum and the, GERS with an amplification factor of 7 do not cnvclopc thc floor response spectra. Provide copies of thc seismic demand versus capacity spectral comparison.
The location of the devices that are documented as outliers in table 4.5 are at elevation 687'n the containment building. Figure 2 shows a comparison of the ISRS at elevation 687'n the containment building to 1.5 times the bounding spectrum. The GERS must be compared to 1.5 times the demand spectra for median centered spectra because Cook Nuclear Plant response spectra was designated as median centered spectra by the NRC. An amplification factor through the piping and support of the piping system must also be considered when comparing GERS to the demand spectra. The GIP defines the upper bound amplification factor as 7. Therefore, the total ISRS was multiplied by 1.5 x 7 (10.5) to define the demand that is compared to the GERS. Figure 3 shows a comparison of the GERS for air operated valves (AOVs) to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'. Figure 4 shows a comparison of the GERS for solenoid operated valves (SOUs) to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'. Figure 5 shows a comparison of the GERS for motor operators to 10.5 x the ISRS at containment building elevation 687'. As shown in figures 2, 3, 4, and 5, the demand exceeds the capacity.
The outlier resolution for these items is to review the existing piping analyses and compare the demand acceleration from the analysis to the capacity acceleration. It is believed that the actual amplification factor is less than 7 and the capacity will be shown to be greater than the demand once the outlier resolution has been completed.
10
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Cont. Bldg. Elev. 687.5 feet vs 1.5xBS 5% Damping 2,00 1,50 C
0 GJ S
Q) : ~ ~
i ~ .: ~: ~ X I ~ ~
u 1,00 0 P
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~
0 I I ~ I ~ 'I 0.50
~ ~ I r ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ \
~ r,, ~ J' ~ ~ ~ ~ '1 ~ ~ I 0 00
~
0.1 10 Frequency (Hz) 1.5xBS EL667.5 Figure 2 ISRS for Containment El. 6".7.5'. Vs. 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum - 5% Damping 11
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Amplified Containment Building El. 687.5 feet vs AOV GERS 5o/o Damping 20
~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
15 C
0 l6$ 'I r ~ r r ~ ~ ~ ~ r
- 0) ' ~ h ~
10 (5 ~ r D
S
.'/'./:
- a. 5 (0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- r~..-'..
-:.r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ': ~:
~ ~ ': ~:.
~ \4 ~
0 0.1 10 Frequency (Hz) 1 O.Gx AOV EL687 GERS Figure 3 Amplified ISRS for Containment El. 687.5's. AOV GERS -5% Damping
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Amplified Containment Building El. 687.5 feet vs Solenoid Valve GERS
-
5/o Damping 20 I I I I \ I
~ r 1 h ~
~ \ h ~
15 O I' I' I 'I ~ ~
C r I ~ e ~ 0 ~ h ~ ~
u 10 O
C I ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ h S
0 Q)
- a. 5 CO I \ ~ h h I j I ~ I' ~ P
~
g
/~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~
/ ~ ~ ~ ~ h ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ \ ~ ~
0.1 10 50
. Frequency (Hz) 1 0.5x Solenoid EL687 GERS F<igure 4 Amplified ISRS for Containment El. 687.5's. Solenoid Valve GERS - 5% Damping 13
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Amplified Containment Building El. 687.5 feet vs MOV GERS 5% Damping 25 'r '
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~
~ r 20
'I
. ~ s... ~ .s.) ~ ~ .... ~
C ~:- -': I ~:. ~-
0 ~ ~ ~
r ~ ~ ~
C 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t I. r ~ ~ ~
~;:.I-
~
~
O ~ 4 % ~ . I...... '
O e e 0
~ e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ./ ~
10
~ ~
0 '
r ~ o' ~ ~ ~ J' ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I CL (0 -5 t r ~ ~ ~ 5
~ 5 0 0 4 1 ~ 8 ~ I 0
0.1 10 50 Frequency (Hz) 3 0.5x MOV EL687 GERS Figure 5 Amplified ISRS for Containment El. 687.5's. Motor Operator GERS - 5% Damping l4
Regarding thc tightncss check of expansion anchors performed on a representative number of mechanical and electrical components, state whether the representative number meets thc sample size for expansion anchor tightness check as listed on table C.2-4 of the GIP.
The number of expansion bolts tightness tested for the Cook Nuclear Plant VSI A-46 effort exceeded the sample size for expansion anchor tightness check as listed on table C.2-4 of the GIP. Bolt tightness checks were conducted on every accessible expansion bolt in the scope of USI A-46 equipment on the SSEL. In addition all accessible steel to steel and cast-in-place bolts/nuts were visually inspected and loose nuts were tightened as needed. This was done to ensure that the bolts were snug and therefore active in the event of vertical reaction loadings on the anchorage during an earthquake. Other tests using ultrasonic techniques to determine embedment length and weld quality were also performed as an enhancement to the program. Anchorage inspection documentation is included with the SEWS in attachment 2 of this RAI.
When the type of expansion anchor used could not be positively determined, a 0.6 reduction factor for unknown expansion bolts was used in the anchorage evaluations performed in accordance with the GIP.
Inaccessible anchor bolts were not tightness tested. The GIP excludes inaccessible anchors from the sample and states in the second paragraph of section 4 4.1 that "all accessible anchorages should be visually inspected. All practicable'means should be tried to inspect inaccessible anchorages or those if if obstructed from view they are needed for strength to secure the item of equipment or they secure housing essential relays (to avoid impact or excessive cabinet motion). For exam'pie, it is 'quipment not considered practicable to resort to equipment disassembly, removal, etc., to inspect inaccessible anchorages. The basis for the engineering judgment for not performing these inspections should be documented." The majority of anchorages for SSEL equipment were accessible. These anchorages were tightness tested, had their embedment length verified and were visually inspected by the anchorage inspection team and were again visually inspected by the SRT.
There were some fans that had inaccessible anchorages that would have required removal of fire protection material to inspect and disposal of material that could possibly be contaminated. This would not have been consistent with the ALARAgoals at the site (dust and exposure). These fans had calculated or judgmental anchorage margins of 10 or greater and therefore were not inspected.
Anchorages for these were primarily cast in place or steel to steel bolts and the tightness check was not required to be performed. The regenerative heat exchanger anchorages were also not visually inspected due to the time required to remove insulation and to perform the anchorage inspection in a high radiation area. There werc also a number of wall mounted panels (class 14 and 20) that were not tightness checked. Tightness checking of these bolts would have required complete equipment disassembly and removal of the equipment. This activity would be contrary to section 4.4.1 of the GIP. These panels also had very high margins even when considering a 0.6 reduction factor for unknown expansion anchors. In the cases mentioned above, the engineering judgment for not performing the inspections were documented on the SEWS for the equipment item. There were also some cases when isolated bolts were not tested on a given assembly because they could not be reached without disassembly. These cases are documented in the anchorage inspection documentation.
- 5) Table 5.1 shows only four (4) vertical tanks for GIP review. Provide the engineering criteria for sclccting only four vertical tanks and thc justification of the structural integrity of the other smaller vertical tanks for Safe Shutdown E<arthquakc (SSK). Indicate the number of vertical tanks supported on skirts and structural legs at Cook Nuclear Plant, Units 1 8r, 2.
Table 5.1 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal includes only the flat bottom vertical tanks that may be evaluated using the GIP methodology in section 7 of the GIP. These tanks are described in the first paragraph of section 7.3.1 of the GIP which states: "The type of vertical tanks covered by the screening guidelines are large, cylindrical tanks whose axis of symmetry is vertical and are supported, on their flat bottoms, directly on a concrete pad or a floor."
The evaluation of the remaining tanks are documented in table 4-7 of the final Seismic Evaluation and Walkdown Summary Report submittal. Items 1 and 2 of table 4-7 "Commentary on Equipment Items Meeting the Intent of the GIP Caveats" discuss this evaluation. Item 1 includes class 0 equipment items and states "There are 50 and 51 equipment items identified as class 0 in unit 1 and unit 2 respectively. These items were primarily passive and were similar to items considered as components of the class 21 equipment. For these equipment items the SRT assessed the potential for seismic damage and made the necessary evaluations. All these items were at locations in the plant where 1.5 times the bounding spectrum is greater than the floor response spectra where they are located. Anchorage was evaluated using the GIP criteria." Item 2 includes class 21 tanks and heat exchangers not covered by the GIP criteria (section 7 of the GIP). This item states:. "There are 63 and 58 equipment items identified as class 21 in unit 1 and unit 2 respectively. Of these tanks and heat exchangers, there were only 20 where the GIP criteria was applicable. The remaining 98 were evaluated by meeting the intent of the GIP criteria. Anchorage was evaluated using the GIP criteria."
The class 0 and 21 equipment items on the SSEL that may be categorized as tanks and heat exchangers for unit 1 and 2 are listed in tables 2 &, 3, respectively. The table includes a description of the tank or heat exchangers configuration and anchorage evaluation. Included in that list are all tanks supported on skirts and structural legs that are on the Cook Nuclear Plant SSEL. Tanks on legs include 1,2-QT-113-AB1, AB2, CD1, CD2 (eight diesel oil filters); 1,2-QT-144-AB, CD (four diesel oil filters}; 1,2-TK-10 (two reactor coolant letdown volume control tanks); 1,2-TK-11 (two boron injection tanks); 1-TK-12-N, 12-TK-12-M and 2-TK-12S (three boric acid storage tanks}. Tanks on skirts include 1,2-TK-37 (two component cooling water surge tanks); and 1,2-QT-141, AB1, AB2, CD1, CD2 (eight diesel starting air receivers).
Sample SEWS (including the calculations and anchorage inspection documentation) are provided in attachment 3 for the tanks that have an
- aAer the equipment ID in tables 2 and 3.
Table 2 Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation I-QT-112-AB &, AB & CD EMERG AUXILIARY 579 Small tank-like component containing oil, with a height of about 5', and a CD (2 filters) DIESEL FULL diameter of 3'. Weight full = 2707 lbs. Anchored by three 3/8" diameter J-FLOW LUBE OIL FILTERS bolts and three 5/8" wedge anchors at 60 degree intervals (i.e., evenly spaced).
The anchorage was screened based on a review of an existing vendor calculation that indicated a high anchorage margin.
I-QT- I 13-AB I *, AB &, CD EMERG AUXILIARY 579 Strainer supported on 4 angle legs. Each leg is anchored by one 1/2" J-bolt 113-AB2, 113- DIESEL FULL anchor. The total weight is 1730 lbs. The ANCHOR4 analysis performed CD I, 113-CD2 FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINERS for 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2 together, since they are connected (4 strainers) by a relatively rigid piping segment, indicated that the anchorage was adequate..
I-QT-116-AB & AB &, CD EMERG AUXILIARY 579 Heaters anchored by three 3/8" J-bolts at 120 degrees apart, on a 5" high CD (2 heater DIESEL LUBE OIL concrete pad. The weight of the tank is approximately 152.5 lbs.
tanks) HEATER (TANK)
Anchorage screened by an ANCHOR4 evaluation.
I-QT-118-AB & AB EMERG DIESEL AUXILIARY 579 Filter anchored by three 3/8" J-bolts with a minimum embedment of CD (2 filters) BYPASS LUBE OIL 10.25", at 120 degrees.
FILTER The approximate weight of the tank is estimated to be the same as 1-QT-112-CD (Wt =2707 lbs.), because the tanks are of the same manufacturer, and size, and both hold oil.
Anchorage screened by an ANCHOR4 evaluation.
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation I-QT-143-ABI, AB EMERG AUXILIARY Air dryer mounted on 2-1/2" x 2-1/2" x 1/4" angle steel frame with other AB2, CD I & DIESEL CONTROL air dryer tanks. Angle frame on 1-3/4" Grout Pad. Frame anchored by CD2 (4 dryers) AIR DRYER I eight 1/2" non-shell type expansion anchors, four per base plate. Tanks hold air and are the size of fire extinguishers.
Anchorage judged adequate based on the walkdown and review of the anchorage inspection documentation.
I-QT-144-AB AB EMERG AUXILIARY 58 Small filter 10" in diameter, 44" high, mounted on three angle legs
& CD (2 filters) DIESEL FUEL OIL 7 anchored by three 5/8" Phillips Red Head Wedge/coupling anchors TRANSFER FILTERS Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation for 1-QT-144-AB.
I -TK-253-1, 2, PRESSURIZER TR CONTAINMENT 61 This horizontal tank contains air and is supported by other than standard 3 & 4 (4 tanks) "B" PRESSURE 2 saddles:
RELIEF VALVE NRV-152 RESERVE CONTROL AIR Tank is well welded to building steel, and judged adequate by the SRT.
TANKS 12-TK-207 REACTOR PLANT GROUNDS 60 Similar to a horizontal heat exchanger; each tank is approximately 2'n NITROGEN BULK 9 diameter and 20'ong (about 15'etween supports). Tank weight is about STORAGE TANKS 4800 lbs. Anchorage consists of four cast-in-place (in buried concrete
¹3,4,5,6,7,8 pedestals) 3/4" diameter J-Bolts.
Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation.
18
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-HE-11 REACTOR AUXILIARY 609 Vertical Heat Exchanger is identical to 2-HE-11. The anchorage was COOLANT PUMP screened by comparison to the calculation for 2-HE-11.
SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER 21 I-HE-13* EXCESS LET CONTAINMENT 612 Relatively small exchanger (1600 lbs) on two saddles in extremely high rad DOWN HEAT area.
EXCHANGER Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers. Could not inspect the anchorage due to ALARAconsiderations.
Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts) and small exchanger, the anchorage was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 I-HE-14 LETDOWN HEAT AUXILIARY 633 Exchanger anchored with two 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing.
EXCHANGER Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to the C.G. of exchanger is 13".
Vertical distance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29".
Anchorage adequacy was accepted based on a short hand calculation..
21 I-HE-15E 8c EAST AND WEST AUXILIARY 609 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles.
W (2 CCW HEAT Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts. There are four 1" wedge expansion exchangers) EXCHANGERS anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.
C.G. of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.
A hand calculation was performed for the heat exchanger and the results show that the anchor bolts and saddles are adequate.
19
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-HE-I7E & W (2 EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 6P9 Anchorage more than adequate based on previous analysis of exchanger exchangers) RHR HEAT without top braces. Braces had since been installed.
EXCH ANGERS 21 I-HE-18E' W (2 EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 6P9 Very well engineered support structure.
exchangers) CONTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCH ANGERS There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the mall in each of the four quadrants. This takes the overturning loads on the exchanger.
Bottom support (at about the 1/4 point of the exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below) is a heavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations. These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviously well engineered.
Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis. Based on the review of this analysis and anchorage inspection documentation the Heat Exchanger is adequate.
21 I-HE-32E & 32W EAST RHR PUMP AUXILIARY 573 8" diameter by 2" wide exchanger, attached to East Residual Heat (2 exchangers) PP-35E Removal Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have been considered with MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT the pump'using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed EXCHANGERS separately on the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
20
~>
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-HE-33E & W(2 EAST AND WEST AUXILIARY 573 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to East Containment exchangers) CONTAINMENT Spray Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pump SPRAY PUMP PP-9E MECHANICAL using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately SEAL HEAT on the SSEL.
EXCHANGER Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 I-HE-34-NE*, 34- NORTH SAFETY AUXILIARY 587 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety Injection NW, 34-SE, & 34- INJECTION PUMP Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pump using SW (4 exchangers) PP-26N INBOARD
- the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT SSEL.
EXCHANGERS Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 I-HE-35N, 35S (2 NORTH SAFETY AUXILIARY 587 Small exchangers 1'-5" long and 4" in diameter attached to North Safety coolers) INJECTION PUMP Injection Pump with four 1/4" bolts. Could have screened with the PP-26N LUBE OIL COOLERS pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21
I Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-HE-36-EN, 36-ES, EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 587 6" in diameter 8-3/4" high heat exchanger, attached to East 36-WN, 36-WS CENTRIFUGAL Centrifugal Charging Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have (4 exchangers) CHARGING PUMP PP-50E screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the INBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
EXCHANGERS Anchorage to the-pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 I-HE-37E, 37W (2 EAST&, WEST AUXILIARY 537 Small exchanger 1'-6" long and 5" in diameter attached to coolers) CENTRIFUGAL reinforced plate support with four 1/2" bolts. Plate support bolted CHARGING PUMP PP-to East Centrifugal Charging Pump with three 1/2" bolts. Could 50E, &50WGEAROIL COOLERS have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 I-HE-38E & 38W (2 EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 5g7 Small exchangers 1'-6" long and 5" in diameter bolted to two coolers) CENTRIFUGAL channel columns that are welded to the skid of the East 1'ong CHARGING PUMP BEARING LUBE OIL Centrifugal Charging Pump. Could have screened with the pump COOLERS using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
22
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation
- I-HE-47-ABN & 47- AB & CD EMERG AUXILIARY 587 Aftercooler on Diesel Generator skid transfers its lateral load to the ABS, 47-CDN & 47- DIESEL NORTH inlet manifolds. Gravity loads are carried by a post on a spring hanger CDS (4 aItercoolers) COMBUSTION base, so the post is incapable of carrying lateral or longitudinal load.
AIR AFTERCOOLERS The Diesel Generator Turbochargers in Unit 1 were replaced in a recent outage. As part of the modification, an analysis was perforined for the associated piping and the aftercoolers. All supports met D.C. Cook acceptance criteria.
21 I-QP-21 NORTH BORIC AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Blender supported by piping. It is in-line with the pipe ACID BLENDER between two pipe supports offthe floor. Blender very small (6" in (MIXINGTEE) diameter and 11" long).
Screened based on drawings (insulation precluded inspection of the blender connection to the piping system) and inspection for interactions.
21 I-QT-107- AB & CD CD EMERG AUXILIARY 587 Horizontal tanks which sits on two saddles. Each saddle has two, 1/4" (2 tanks) DIESEL FUEL OIL thick plates, forming a "U", with no gussets. There are two 5/8" anchors DAY TANKS per saddle.
A Horizontal Tank Analysis was performed to show that the tank anchorage is adequate.
21 I-QT-110-AB & CD AB & CD EMERG AUXILIARY 587 Lube Oil Coolers mounted to wall with fourteen 3/4" wedge type (2 Coolers) DIESEL LUBE OIL expansion anchors.
COOLERS External Anchor Analysis was performed on the Unit 2 Jacket Water Heater 2-QT-131-CD which has the same configuration as 1-QT-110-AB. Based on this. analysis, both supports are adequate.
23
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-QT-131-AB &, AB 64 CD EMERG AUXILIARY 587 Jacket Water Cooler mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" wedge type CD (2 Coolers) DIESEL JACKET expansion anchors. External Anchor Analysis was performed on the Unit WATER 2 Jacket Water Heater 2-QT-131-CD..
COOLERS Based on this analysis both supports are adequate.
I-QT-133-AB & AB 8c CD EMERG AUXILIARY 587 100 Gal. Tanks, 2'-6" D x 3'.
CD (2 Tanks) DIESEL JACKET WATER SURGE TANKS Notes and the ANCHOR4 analysis for 1-QT-133-CD also apply to 1-QT-133-AB since they are essentially identical.
The surge tanks are supported (bolted) to a shelf. The shelf is bolted to the wall by four J-bolts. In addition, two 3/4" wedge anchors attach the top channel to the wall. The wedge anchors were conservatively left out of the ANCHOR4 analysis.
The anchorage was screened based on an ANCHOR4 analysis for the anchorage to the shelf.
21 I-QT-134-AB & AB & CD EMERG AUXILIARY 587 The AB tank is the same as the CD tank except that 3/8" bolts were 134-CD (2 Tanks) DIESEL AUX measured in the field instead of the 1/4" bolts on the drawings for AB.
JACKET WATER HEATERS (TANKS} The ANCHOR4 analysis for 1-QT-134-CD (using 1/4" diameter Phillips Redhead Wedge Anchors) demonstrated adequacy. The base plates were also shown to be adequate.
24
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)
Class ID Description Building'l. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation I -QT-141-AB I, AB & CD EMERG AUXILIARY 21 5S7 Air tanks anchored by four 5/S" J-bolts (Ref. 1, 4). Total weight for 141-AB2, 141-CD I, DIESEL STARTING each tank is 6000 lb.
141-CD2 (4 air AIR RECEIVERS I receivers) &2 Tank anchorage was verified by an ANCHOR4 analysis. Nozzle loads were included.
21 I-TK-10 REACTOR AUXILIARY 609 Tank on 4 wide flange legs, 90 inches in diameter and 120 inches in COOLANT height.
LETDOWN VOLUME CONTROL TANK Tank 1-TK-10 is similar to the 2-TK-10. Tank anchorage and wide
.flange legs were evaluated in a hand calculation for 2-TK-10 and found to be adequate.
21 I-TK-11* BORON INJECTION AUXILIARY 612 Tank is 5'iameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Leg TANK supports (10" WF w/5/S" flange) 4'-4" in height..
.Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/ two embedded 1 3/4" bolts.
The Seismic Evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) is seismically adequate. The Boron Injection Tank (1-TK-11) is much smaller but has about the same support. Therefore, Tank 1-TK-11 is judged adequate based on comparison.
21 I-TK-200 MAINSTEAM 621 Small tank supported from floor.
LEADS CONDENSATION DRAIN TANK Anchorage judged acceptable based on the walkdown and the (POT) anchorage inspection documentation.
25
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-TK-32 CONDENSATE GROUNDS 609 Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height (31'-7" STORAGE TANK liquid tank). 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs. Anchored with thirty 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'-4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete at a 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.
The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 Refueling Water Storage Tanks (RWST) 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33. The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the meld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.
The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST. The calculation for the RWST using the GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.
The CST was screened based on a comparison of the significant attributes to the RWST.
21 I-TK-33 REFUELING G ROUN DS 609 Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'iquid WATER tank). 420,000 gallons, weight 94,000 lbs. The tank is founded on a STORAGE TANK concrete pad and anchored with twenty-five 3/8" th x 5" W x 4' 4" L strap, embedded in concrete a 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.
A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG GIP criteria. The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.
26
Table.2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit I)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 I-TK-37* COMPONENT AUXILIARY 650 Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height. Skirt is 4'-6" high from the top COOLING of the pad to skirt connection to tank. Skirt has I/2" thickness. There are 8 bolts NATER SURGE evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" TANK width. Bolts suppoited from 3" x 3 x I/2" angle.
The anchorage was screened based on a hand calculation performed for the bolt stresses.
21 I -TK-76N, 76S CONTROL AUXILIARY 650 Small tank 2'n length x 9" in diameter on a I" diameter piping system. Tank in-line ROOM A/C with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantilevered angle (2 I/2" x 2 I/2" x 3/8")
NORTH AND about I'6" long. Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to the wall with 2 I/2" SOUTH CHILL expansion anchors.
V/ATER EXPANSION Anchorage and support for these small tanks were accepted by SRT judgment after the TANKS walkdown and a review of the anchora e ins ection documentation.
21 I-TK12-N NORTH BORIC AUXILIARY 537 Boric Acid Tank on 4 Wide Flange Beam Legs.
ACID STORAGE TANK This Tank is identical to tank 2-TK-12S which was evaluated-by means of a calculation. The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are adequate.
21 I 2-HE- I 6N NORTH SPENT AUXILIARY 609 3' 2" diameter horizontal heat exchanger about 22'ong on two saddles supported by FUEL PIT HEAT piers, Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs. Exchanger bolted into pier with four EXCHANGER 7/8" diameter bolts per saddle. Piers are doweled into floor. The results of tank anal sis show that the tank anchora e and saddles are ade uate.
Table 2 (Continued)
Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Kxchangers (Unit 1)
Class ID Descri tion Buildin EI. Descri tion of Confi uration and Anchora e Evaluation 21 12-OME-44N-2 & NORTH & SOUTH AUXILIARY 609 Small Heat Exchanger 3'-2" long by 10" in diameter attached to South 44S-2 RADIOACTIVE Radioactive Waste Gas Compressor OME-44S-1 with 4 - 1/2" bolts.
WASTE GAS COMPRESSOR OME-44N-2 SEAL Compressor anchored to ground with 4 3/4" bolts. The SRT reviewed WATER HEAT the anchorage drawings for the compressor and judged the anchorage EXCHANGERS to be adequate (4 J-bolts). The compressor is not on the SSEL and only anchorage adequacy is required.
The anchorage of the compressor was judged acceptable after a review of the anchorage during the walkdown.
21 12-TK-47-AB* & AB & CD EMERG GROUNDS 609 Underground tanks. SRT evaluated this tank based on the available 47-CD DIESEL FUEL OIL documentation in the equipment package.
STORAGE TANKS A tank calculation was performed by hand. The tank was modeled as a beam on elastic foundation. The overall tank stresses were very low (on the order of 3.6 ksi).
21 12-TK12-M MIDDLEBORIC AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Tank on 4 Wide Flange Beam Legs. All dimensions for the ACID STORAGE tank, legs, connections and anchorage given in the anchorage package TANK for the tank.
This Tank is identical to tank 2-TK-12S which was evaluated by means of a hand calculation. The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are adequate. This tank was screened based on comparison to the Unit 2 calculation.
28
'k Table 3 Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat E<xchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 12-HE-25A 15GPM AUXILIARY 600 Component is supported offshell of much larger (about 4.0') diameter RADIOACTIVE tank 12-TK-148 which is not on the SSEL. This component is WASTE EVAPORATOR designated an outlier due to concerns related to the anchorage for 12-TK-HE-25 148 and nozzle loads.
CONDENSER 12-HE-25B & C (2 15 GPM AUXILIARY 587 The Heat Exchanger is about 14" in diameter and 10 feet long, Coolers) RADIOACTIVE supported by stiffened saddles with two 3/4" diameter anchor bolts in WASTE each saddle, supported offof a steel platform. Weight of HX < 2000 lbs.
EVAPORATOR HE-25 DISTILLATE Capacity exceeds demand for saddles, support frame and platform by COOLERS inspection.
2-QT-112-AB & AB&CD AUXILIARY 579 Small tank, with a ht of about 5'nd a diameter of 3', anchored by six CD (2 filters) EMERGENCY 1/2" expansion anchors at 60 degree intervals. Tank contains oil, total DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL maximum approximate weight = 2707 lbs.
FILTER ANCHOR analysis shows high margins and includes inlet and outlet nozzle loads.
29
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class Descri tion Buildin El. Descri tion of Confi uration and Anchora e Evaluation 2-QT-113- AB EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 579 Supported on four angle legs. Each leg is anchored by one I/2" J-bolt anchor.
ABI, AB2, DIESEL FULL Weight = 17304, c.g. at approx. mid-height = 33".
CDI & CD2 (4 FLOW LUBE OIL Strainers) STRAINER 5 I The ANCHOR analysis performed for CDI & CD2 including nozzle loads showed a high margin. The inlet and outlet nozzle loads were assumed equally distributed between the two strainers. Anchorage for ABI and AB2 was acceptable by corn arison.
2-QT-116-AB AB&CD AUXILIARY 579 Small heater 9.5" Dia. x 3'-9.5" Ht.
&CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL Anchorage screened based on the ANCHOR4 analysis for 116-CD.
HEATER TANK II 2-QT-118-A B AB EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 579 Filter anchored by nine anchors in three groups of three, so each group is 120 degrees
&CD DIESEL BYPASS for the next (i.e., evenly space).
LUBE OIL FILTER The approx. syeight of the tank is estimated to be the same as that of 2-QT-I l2-CD (Wt =2707//), because the tanks are of the same manufacturer, size, and both hold oil.
Anchorage screened based on an ANCHOR4 evaluation.
2-QT-143- AB EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 587 Small tank mounted together on steel frame with the other air dryer tank (ABI with ABI, AB2 and DIESEL AB2 and CDI with CD2). Frame anchored by eight 3/8" non-shell type expansion CD I, CD2 (4 CONTROL AIR anchors, four per base plate. Tanks hold air and are the size of fire extinguishers, dryers) DRYER/II (approx. 8.9 lbs. filled weight each). The nozzle loads are not a concern.
Anchorage screened based on judgment aAer walkdown and review of anchorage inspection documentation.
30
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 2-QT-l44-AB & AB&CD AUXILIARY 587 Small filter on three angle legs anchored by three 5/8" Phillips Red Head Wedge CD (2 filters) EMERGENCY anchors. No interactions.
DIESEL FUEL OIL TRANSFER FILTER Anchorage screened by judgment after walkdown and review of anchorage inspection documentation.
0 2-TK-253-1 & 2 PRESSURIZER CONTAINMENT 612 This component is a small (about 4.5'ong x 16" diameter) air tank horizontally TRAIN mounted (welded) on a short length of I beam which in turn is welded to building
'A'RESSURE RELIEF steel. Tank weight was assumed to be 250 lbs.
VLVNRV-153 RESERVE An ANCHOR4 analysis showed a very high margin.
CONTROL AIR BOTTLE RACK 0 2-TK-253-3 &4 PRESSURIZER CONTAINMENT 650 This component is a cylindrical compressed air "bottle" about 12" in diameter and TRAIN 60" tall, secured to the crane wall with steel straps that are attached to a very stout
'B'RESSURE RELIEF steel bracket arrangement, secured to the wall with a number of expansion anchors.
VLVNRV-152 EMERGENCY AIR AEPSC Structural & Analytical Design Nuclear Section reviewed the as-found BOTTLE RACK condition of the support for this tank, and found it to be adequate for design loads.
21 12-HE-16S SOUTH SPENT AUXILIARY 609 Horizontal heat exchanger 3' 2" diameter, and about 22'ong on two saddles FUEL PIT HEAT supported by piers. Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs.
EXCHANGER Exchanger bolted into pier with four 718" diameter bolts per saddle. Piers are doweled into floor. The tank anchorage and saddles were adequate based on the analysis for 12-HE-16N as noted in Table 2.
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-HE-I I >> REACTOR AUXILIARY 609 Vertical Heat Exchanger on a Gusseted steel pedestal. Each Pedestal COOLANT PUMP is anchored to the floor with eight 3/4" J-Bolts embedded 20" into SEAL WATER HEAT floor. Exchanger is 16" in diameter and 14'n height.
EXCHANGER Exchanger is bolted to the steel pedestal with two 1" diameter steel bolts on 6" centers in weak direction and 2'-8" in strong direction.
This connection is more limiting than the anchorage to the floor.
A hand calculation was performed to demonstrate the adequacy of these four bolts.
21 2-HE-13 EXCESS LETDOWN CONTAINMENT 612 Heat exchanger (1600 Ibs) on two saddles in extremely high rad area.
HEAT EXCHANGER Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers. Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts) and small exchanger, the anchorage is acceptable by SRT judgment.
21 2-HE-14 LETDOWN HEAT AUXILIARY 633 Exchanger anchored with two 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" EXCHANGER spacing. Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to the C.G. of exchanger is 13". Vertical distance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29". Anchorage adequacy was accepted based on a short hand calculation.
21 2-HE-15E & EAST k WEST AUXILIARY 609 Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced 15W (2 COMPONENT saddles. Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts. There are four 1" exchangers) COOLING WATER HEAT wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction.
EXCHANGER C.G. of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'.
Anchorage screened based on a hand calculation for 1-HE-15E.
32
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class Descri tion Buildin El. Descri tion of Confi oration and Anchora e Evaluation 21 2-HE-17E & 17W EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 609 Very well engineered support structure. There is a ring support at top of the RESIDUAL HEAT exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the four quadrants. This takes the REMOVALHEAT overturning loads on the exchanger. Bottom support is a heavy duty steel gusset EXCHANGER structure supported by two peers. There are two bolts in each peer. The support structure for the exchanger is obviously well engineered.
Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis. Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected, the Heat Exchangers are adequate.
21 2-HE-18E & 18 W EAST& WEST AUXILIARY 609 Very well engineered support structure. There is a ring support at top of the CONTAINMENT exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the four quadrants. This takes the SPRAY HEAT overturning loads on the exchanger. Bottom support (at about the quarter point of the EXCHANGER exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below) is a heavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations. These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviously well engineered.
Qualification data indicates an analysis to the design basis. Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected the Heat Exchanger is adequate.
21 2-HE-32E & 32W EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 573 8" in diameter by 2" long exchanger, attached to East Residual Heat Removal Pump RESIDUAL HEAT with two 5/8" bolts. Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, REMOVALPUMP however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
PP-35E MECHANICAL Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by SRT judgment.
SEAL HEAT EXCHANGERS 33
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-HE-33E & EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 573 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, is not attached to the East 33W (2 CONTAINMENT Containment Spray Pump as shown on the anchorage sketch, however exchangers) SPRAY PUMP PP-9E MECHANICAL piping can support the small exchanger. Could have screened with the SEAL HEAT pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed EXCHANGERS separately oh the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 2-HE-34-NE, NORTH & SOUTH AUXILIARY 587 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety 34-NW, 34-SE, SAFETY Injection Pump with two 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the
& 34-SW (4 INJECTION PUMP exchangers) PP-26N pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed OUTBOARD separately on the SSEL.
MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
EXCHANGERS 2-HE-35N & NORTH & SOUTH AUXILIARY 587 Small exchanger 1'-5" long by 4" in diameter by 8-3/4", attached to 35S (2 Coolers) SAFETY North Safety Injection Pump with four 1/4" bolts. Could have screened INJECTION PUMP PP-26N LUBE OIL with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was COOLERS listed separately on the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-HE-36-EN, EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 587 6" in diameter 8-3/4" high heat exchanger, attached to East Centrifugal Charging 36-ES, 36-WN, CENTRIFUGAL Pump with two I/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pump using the rule of 36-WS (4 CHARGING PUMP PP- the box, however the exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
exchangers) 50E INBOARD MECHANICALSEAL Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
HEAT EXCHANGERS 21 2-HE-37E, EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 587 Exchanger I'-6" long and 5" in diameter attached to reinforced plate support with 37W CENTRIFUGAL four I/2" bolts. Plate support bolted to East Centrifugal Charging Pump with CHARGING PUMP PP- three I/2" bolts. Could have screened using the rule of the box, however the 50E GEAR OIL exchanger has a separate SSEL listing.
COOLER Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 ~ 2-HE-38E* & EAST & WEST AUXILIARY 587 Small exchanger I'-6" long and 5" in diameter bolted to 2 1'ong channel 38W CENTRIFUGAL columns that are welded to the skid of the East Centrifugal Charging Pump.
CHARGING PUMP PP- Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the 50E LUBE OIL COOLER exchanger was listed separately on the SSEL.
Anchorage to the pumps was judged adequate by the SRT.
21 2-HE-47-ABN AB & CD EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 587 Aftercooler transfers its lateral load to the inlet manifolds. Gravity loads are
&, 47-A BS, 47- DIESEL NORTH carried by a post on a spring hanger base, so the post is incapable of carryin CDN &47- COMBUSTION AIR lateral or longitudinal load.
CDS (4 AFTER-COOLERS aAercoolers) The Diesel Generator Turbochargers in Unit 2 were replaced in a recent outa< e.
As part of the modil ication an analysis was perlonned for thc associated piping and the aAercoolers. All supports met the D.C. Cook acceptance criteria.
35
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-QP-21 SOUTH BORIC ACID AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Blender supported by piping. It is in-line with the pipe between two BLENDER pipe supports offthe floor. Blender very small (6" in diameter and I I" long).
Screened based on drawings (insulation precluded inspection of the blender connection to the piping system) and inspection for interactions.
21 2-QT-107- AB AB & CD EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 587 Horizontal tanks which sits on two saddles. Each saddle has two I/4" thick plates,
& CD (2 tanks) DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY forming a "U", with no gussets. There are two 5/8" anchors per saddle.
TANKS A Horizontal Tank Analysis was performed to show that the tank anchorage is adequate.
21 2-QT-110-AB AB & CD EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 5/7 Lube Oil Coolers, mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" Wedge type anchors.
&CD DIESEL LUBE OIL (2 Coolers) COOLER External ANCHOR4 analysis for 2-QT-110-CD was performed. Based on the results of this evaluation both coolers were screened.
21 2-QT-115-AB AB & CD EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 5 79 The tank sits on two saddles, two plates per saddle, I/O" thick. There are two 3/4"
& CD(2 DIESEL LUBE OIL anchors per saddle. There are four anchors in total for the tank.
Tanks) SUMP TANKS Anchorage screened based on review of the anchorage inspection documentation and the vendor qualification of the tanks.
21 2-QT-131-AB AB & CD EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 587 Jacket Water Cooler mounted to wall by fourteen 3/4" wedge type expansion
& CD(2 DIESEL JACKET anchors.
Coolers) WATER COOLER An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-131-CD. Based on that analysis both coolers were screened.
36
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-QT-133-A B AB&CD AUXILIARY 587 100 GAL. TANK, 2'-6" D x 3'.
& CD (2 tanks) EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER SURGE The surge tanks are supported (bolted) to a shelf. The shelf is bolted TANK to the wall by four 7/8" anchors.
An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-133-CD. Based on that analysis both coolers were screened.
21 2-QT- l34-AB AB & CD AUXILIARY 587 Heater tanks separately mounted by three 1/2" coupling rods and
& CD4 (2 EMERGENCY Phillips Redhead wedge type anchors.
tanks) DIESEL AUXILIARY JACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) An ANCHOR4 was performed on 2-QT-134-CD. Based on that analysis both coolers were screened.
21 2-QT-14 I- AB EMERGENCY AUXILIARY 587 Air tanks anchored by four 5/8" J-bolts. Total weight for the tank is ABI, AB2, DIESEL STARTING 6000 lbs.
CDI, & CD2(4 AIR RECEIVER III Air Receivers)
The tank anchorage was verified by an ANCHOR4 analysis. Nozzle loads were included.
21 2-TK-10 REACTOR COOLANT AUXILIARY 609 Tank on four wide flange legs, 90 inches in diameter and 120 inches LETDOWN VOLUME in height.
CONTROL TANK The tank leg support and anchorage was screened based on a hand calculation.
37
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-TK- I I BORON INJECTION AUXILIARY 612 Tank is about 5'n diameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide TANK Flange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/8" flange) 4'-4" in height..
Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/ two embedded 1 3/4" bolts.
Weld of leg to tank about 14" in length and 1/4" thickness on each side of the wide flange and 10" at the top of the wide flange.
The seismic evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) indicates that it is seismically adequate. The Boron Injection Tank is much smaller but has about the same support. Therefore, Tank 2-TK-11 is judged adequate based on comparison 21 2-TK-12S SOUTH BORIC ACID AUXILIARY 587 Boric Acid Tank on four Wide Flange Beam Legs.
STORAGE TANK Tank anchorage and wide flange legs were evaluated using a hand calculation. The calculation indicated that the legs and anchorage are adequate.
21 2-TK- 150 MAINSTEAM LEADS AUXILIARY 600 Small horizontal tank bolted to wall in-line with the piping system.
CONDENSATE DRAIN TANK Anchorage was judged acceptable based on the walkdown and a review of the anchorage inspection documentation.
38
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-TK-32 CONDENSATE GROUNDS 609 Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height, STORAGE TANK 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs. Anchored with thirty 3/8" th x 5" w x 4' 4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.
The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 RWST 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33. The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap.
The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST. The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.
The CST was screened based on a comparison of the significant attributes to the RWST.
21 2-TK-33 REFUELING GROUNDS 609 Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'-0" WATER STORAGE liquid tank 420,000 gallons and weighs 94,000 lbs. Anchored with TANK twenty-five 3/8" th x 5" w x 4' 4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.
A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG G1P criteria. The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The calculation for the RWST using the GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear.
39
Table 3 (Continued)
Description of Anchorage Evaluation for Tanks and Heat Exchangers (Unit 2)
Class ID Description Building El. Description of Configuration and Anchorage Evaluation 21 2-TK-37 COMPONENT AUXILIARY 650 Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height. Skirt is 4'-6" high COOLING WATER from the top of the pad to skirt connection to tank. Skirt has 1/2" SURGE TANK thickness.. There are eight bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" width. Bolts supported from 3" x 3" x 1/2" angle.
2-TK-37 is similar to 1-TK-37. The support for 2-TK-37 was screened based on the hand calculation for 1-TK-37.
21 2-TK-76N*, CONTROL ROOM AIR AUXILIARY 650 Small tank 2'n length x 9 " in diameter on a 1" diameter piping 76S CONDITIONING system. Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a NORTH AND SOUTH CHILL WATER cantilevered angle (2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 3/8") about 1'-6" long. Angle EXPANSION TANKS welded to a plate that is bolted to the reinforced block wall with three 5/8" diameter through bolts (other side of wall inspected and bolts came through).
Anchorage and support for these small tanks were accepted by SRT judgment after the walkdown and a review of the anchorage inspection documentation.
40
r Section 5.1.2 states that all four tanks reviewed met the intent of the GIP. Indicate that thc GIP-2 guidclincs and methodology are fully.mct or identify any deviations from thc guidelines and thc methodology. Provide calculations for determining thc seismic adequacy of the tanks (ID 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32) using thc methodology dcscribcd in section 7 of thc GIP-2. The evaluation of thc anchors which restrain the tank movement should also be provided.
The flat bottom tanks were screened based on calculations performed on August 25, 1989, prior to the publication of the rev. 2 GIP. The evaluation performed followed the procedure available at the time in the rev. 1 GIP. There are only minor differences between the two revisions that do not affect the results due to the resulting high margins.
There are two differences in the configuration of the RWST (1-TK-33) that are not in conformance with the GIP procedure: a) the tJR = .0007351 which is less than the limits of the GIP screening table of .001; and b) the tank was not anchored with bolts but rather with twenty-five 3/8" x 5" x 4' 4" long straps that are embedded in the concrete at a two foot depth with a two inch radius hook at the end.
The tJR issue was accounted for by making an appropriate adjustment in the calculated natural frequency for the tank. The anchorage was considered by replacing the strap in the calculation with bolts of equivalent area and strength. Both of these modifications meet the intent of the GIP guidelines. The calculation resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The calculation for the RWST using the Rev. 1 GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear. In order to obtain further assurance that the RWST is seismically adequate a calculation that conformed to'ASCE Standard 4-86 was performed and'yielded similar results.
The strap detail for the CST (2-TK-32) is identical to the strap for the RWST (1-TK-33). The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The CST also has a very similar configuration as this RWST. The CST was therefore screened based on a comparison of the significant attributes to the RWST.
The SEWS for 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-32 including the calculations are included as attachment 4.
7i Section 5.1.5 states that horizontal tanks and heat cxchangers rcviewcd mct thc intent of thc GIP. Indicate that the GIP-2 guidelines and methodology are fully met or identify any deviations from them. Provide calculations using the methodology described in section 7 of the GIP-2 for the following tanks and cxchangers: 1-HE-14, 2-HK-15K, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB and 2-QT-115-CD. The evaluation of the anchors which restrain thc tank movement should also be provided.
As previously discussed in response to questions 2 and 5, anchorage and support evaluations took several different forms consistent with the GIP. These forms included for tanks and heat exchangers: a) detailed evaluations using the step by step procedure in section 7.4 of the GIP; b) detailed hand calculations; c) screening based on an anchorage evaluation for an identical item of equipment and anchorage or a worst case evaluation of a similar item; or d) the SRT judged, based on the weight and anchorage of the equipment, that the anchorage obviously met the GIP screening criteria. The GIP-2 guidelines for adequate strength of the tanks or exchangers, saddles and anchorage are met for all horizontal tanks and heat exchangers that were identified in the final report as screened. The step by step procedure in section 7.4 was not used for supports that were obviously rugged based on the inspection. Exchangers that did not meet 'the applicable ranges of parameters and assumptions contained in table 7-6 of the GIP could not be evaluated with the section 7.4 procedure. These tanks were evaluated as, described in tables 2 and 3 of this response to item 5 of the RAI.
SEWS that include the calculations and the anchorage inspection documentation for 1-HE-14, 2-HE-15E, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB and 2-QT-115-CD are contained in attachment 5 of this submittal. The evaluations for 1-HE-15E and 1-QT-107-CD are also provided since the screening for 2-HE-15E and 1-QT-107-AB are based on these evaluations, respectively. These SEWS and calculations provide a good cross section of the evaluations performed. The calculation for 1-HE-14 was a short hand calculation that indicated the anchorage had a safety margin of eight. A hand calculation was performed for 1-HE-15E that was also used to screen 2-HE-15E. These had a calculated safety margin of four. Heat exchanger 12-HE-16N and tanks 1-QT-107-CD and 2-QT-115-CD included a calculation using the step by step methodology in section 7.4 of the GIP.
S) Tables 6-1 and 6-2 provide a summary of the limited analytical reviews (LARS) for thc sclcctcd cable and conduit raceways. Provide copies of the calculations of the analyses for resolution of thc outlicrs listed as LAR Numbers 005, 011, 022 and 023. Also provide typical sample calculations for thc raceways that arc not selected as outliers (i.e., LAR Numbers 001, 010, 027 and 030).
The requested information is contained in attachment 6 to this RAI.
A' y 9) Discuss thc issue described in thc Information Notice 95-49 regarding Thermo-Lag panels, in particular, thc issue regarding seismic resistance capability of the cable tray and its support when appropriate weight and modulus of the Thermo-Lag are included in thc analysis.
The fire-wrapped raceways were walked-down as part of the USI A-46 raceway evaluations, along with all of the other raceways in the plant. The weight of the Thermo-Lag material was considered in choosing LARS for the USI A-46 effort. None of the hangers supporting fire-wrapped raceways were selected for LAR because: (1) the SRT did not find them to be an enveloping case, i.e., other hangers of similar construction were more heavily loaded; and (2) the SRT was aware that the hangers supporting the fire-wrapped raceways had been evaluated and, unlike most other rod hangers in the plant, had been laterally braced.
In addition, in response to NRC bulletin 92-01 and generic letter 92-08, we performed a walk down of all Thermo-Lag installations in the plant to determine whether seismically induced failure of the Thermo-Lag could result in the Thermo-Lag falling and damaging nearby equipment. This walk down covered all Thermo-Lag installations, including conduits and cable trays, wall pilasters, and electrical equipment. The walkdown team concluded that the Thermo-Lag was well secured, so that large sections could not fall, but smaller pieces (golf ball size and smaller) could fall if local sections of the Thermo-Lag fractured. As a result of the walkdown Thermo-Lag material was removed from some of the conduits to address the safety interface condition.
In the mid 1980s, a minimum number (<10 %) of the cable tray and conduit raceways were fire-wrapped with Thermo-Lag material as part of our 10 CFR 50 Appendix R efforts. Some of the Thermo-Lag material in the plant is being removed and will be replaced with DARMATT material. In some instances, the Thermo-Lag was removed and was not replaced by any other type of material...
44
ATTACHMENT2 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR CLASS 1 THROUGH 20 EQUIPMENT RAI ITEM 2
This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for a cross section of class 1 through 20 equipment items. The samples selected are designated with an
- in Table 1 of this RAI. The following examples are included:
lass 1-ABD-A 2-CRID-1-CVT 1-1'P-10W 1-HV-AFP-Mk 12-HV-E W-7 14 1-A W
-A -A 17 1- Mk:-15 -AB 2- Mk:-150-2-A11
Ol/16/92 I ) PG. HO.
SAfE SNUIOOuN EoulpHENT LIST (SSELup) fUHCI ION: 600 VAC STSTEH Equi pment Class: Train: I Equipment Io ~ 1-ABD-A Drawing Number: 1-12001 1-12010 Systemt ELECTRICAL OlSTRIBUTIOH 600VAC Equip
Description:
600VAC NCC ABD-A Bul l ding: AUXIL I ART Roomt AB EHERG OIESEL GENERATOR ROON Etevationt 587 Normal state: Desired st'ate: Power Required: Sort: U, Supporting System Drawing Munbert Required Interconnections and Suppo upportt ing Components:
C Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR flin/Optt HIM AOOITIOHAL IMFORNATIOM Alias Hubert Power Train: B Component Scrvedt 600Y KCC ABD-A Manufacturer: CUTLER-HAMMER Model:
Panel:
Elem Drawing: uiring Drawingt 1-9QOS I-9C206 Power Source: 1-llAS ualkdownt F Relay Only: H Component Type: HCC ISO Drawings:
Detailed Location: IN tHE MU RE'GIOM OF tHE ROON ROON, NEAR THE NORTH MALL
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NWREGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 587.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) N/A Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = ) N/A Capacity based on: 1.50 Bounding Spectrum Demandbasedon: 1.00 RealisticMedian-CenteredFloorResponseSpectra
'I.200 1
'
I I \
/
LOG I
/
/
0.000 0.50 LOG Hz 50.00 Capacity ..... Demand File Capacit CAGIPtGIPtspectra.des Label Boundin S ctrum Demand 1 C:tGIP'PROJ0035tspectra.des BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Demand 2 C.'tGIPIPROJ0035'Lspectra.dos BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand'
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
Description:
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM MCC/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Data Base Yes MCC/BS Caveat 2 - Rating of 600 V or Less. Yes MCC/BS Caveat 3 - Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together Yes MCC/BS Caveat 4 - Attached Weight of 100 Pounds or Less. N/A MCC/BS Caveat 5 - Externaliy Attached Items Rigidly Anchored. Yes MCC/BS Caveat 6 - General Configuration Similar to NEMA Standards.
Yes MCC/BS Caveat 7- Cutouts Not Large Yes MCC/BS Caveat 8- Doors/Buckets Secured. Yes MCC/BS Caveat 9 - Natural Frequency Relative to 8 Hz Limit Considered. N/A MCC/BS Caveat 10 - Adequate Anchorage. Yes MCC/BS Caveat 11 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated. Yes MCC/BS Caveat 12 - No Other Concerns Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum/
ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, freewdge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 . Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity Yes reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met'?
D.C..COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
Description:
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or Yes structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility. Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects?
CO+IME~N 1-ABD-A & 1-ABD-B in the same box.
5 vertical panels on 4" concrete pad.
Anchorage by bolts in front 4 1/2" J-bolts and 2 1/2" expansion anchors. Anchorage by welds in back 6 2" long 3/16" fillet.
Anchor Pattern:
fx ][ x][x ][ x][x x]
Weight of MCC is a maximum of 800 Ibs/cabinet x 5 = 4000 Ibs, which was used in the anchor analysis.
The AEPSC Rev. 0 report" Fundamental Resonant Frequencies of Cook Nuclear Plant Cabinets, Panels, and Racks in Auxiliary Building Complex ( Determined By In-Situ Modal Testing; Year 1985 and 1986)" dated August 10, 1994 documents the testing of four MCC assemblies. The minimum fundamental frequancy from these tests was 9.6 Hz for MCC assembly 2-ABD-B/ABD-A.The SRT based on this report judged that the frequancy for MCC assembly 1-ABD-A/ABD-B was above 8 Hz. However, for conservatism credit for MCC Assembly 1-ABD-A/ABD-B being above 8 Hz. was not taken, and therefore the caveats on this SEWs related to the 8 Hz issue were answered N/A. This enabled the conservative use of the 1.5 x Bounding Spectrum vs. floor spectrum comparison for capacity vs. demand and the use of the peak of the 5% damped floor spectrum for the anchorage calculations.
No interaction concern.
Zap 345 MCC ABD-ABB Zap,346 Typ. Opening @ bottom.
Anchor Evaluation Performed by Bahaa Mahmoud - S8A Checked by George Gary Thomas.
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER Anchor calculation additional margin = 1.634 Evaluated by Gary Thomas and Satyan Sharma on 7/17/92.
Evaluated by: Date:
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER MCC ABD-AM TYP. OPENING AT BOTTOM.
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER ANCHOR Report Eargm~Z Spectrum: Instructure Realistic
'esponse Frequency: GIP - Flexible Percent Damping: GIP - 5.00 Spectral Values:
Direction Acceleration (g's)
North - South 1.04 East - West 1.04 Vertical 0.17 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS
~We ggs Number of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 4000.00 50.000 10.000 45.000 Fgrrgg Number of External Forces: 0 Eunmh of External Moments: 0
'umber fgc~LIRJRR Number of Anchor types: 2 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EOG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER No. Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 1 1/2 Other J-Bolt (90 6660.00 3330.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 deg) 2 1/2 Other Unknown 2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Expansion Anchor Czmrch.
Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.
Reduction Factor: 0.85 W~
Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.
Surry~c Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Comp Comp Comp No Ny 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹ 1
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 12 ID: 1-ABD.-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER 4x Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts:
Concrete Uncs:
Concrete Potnts: ~IIII Neid Uncs:
knobs" Number of Anchors: 6 Anch Surf No. Id Coord Coord Coord Id 1 1 3.750 1.500 0.000 2 1 36.500 1.500 0.000 3 1 43.800 1.500 0.000 4 2 76.600 1.500 0.000 5 2 83.900 1.500 0.000 6 1 96.300 1.500 0 000
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2l14I92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600YAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Rovi/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER
¹ of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 4 Start Start Start End End End Sf Line No X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coo rd X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coord Id Width 0.000 1.500 0.000 100.000 1.500 0.000 2.000 100.00Q 1.500 0.000 100.000 17.000 0.000 2.000 100.000 17.000 0.000 0.000 17.000 0.000 2.QQQ 0.000 17.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 2.000 Number of Concrete Points: 0
¹ of elements per line: 1 Number of Weld Lines: 6 Start Start Start End End End Line No X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coo rd ld Width 0.000 18.500 0.000 2.250 18.500 0.000 1 0.125 15.400 18.500 0.000 17.600 18.500 0.000 1 0.125 3
19.400 18.500 0.000 21.600 18.500 0.000 1 0.125 56.500 18.500 0.000 58.600 18.500 0.000 1 0.187 59.900 18.500 0.000 62.100 18.500 0.000 0.187 96.100 18.500 0.000 98.400 18.500 0.000 1 0.187 Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 1 Embedment Length: (1 3.60 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹2 Embedment Length: (13 40 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 12 ID:1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 58?.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹3 Embedment Length: (13.60 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=27.25 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹4 Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹5 Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹6 Embedment Length: (13.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity}:=27.25 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc PaIV Pallr/
No Id Vali Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 1 1 3750.91 N/A X 0.56 X X X X 1.00 X X 3330.00 X 1.00 X X, X X 1.00 X X 2 1 3708.29 N/A X 0.56 X X X X 1.00 X X 3330.00 NIA X 1.00 X X 1.00 X X 3 1 3750.91 N/A X 0.56 X X X X 1.00 X X 3330.00 N/A X 1.00 X X X X 1.00 X X 4 2 1717.50 NIA X X X X X X 0.75 X X 1785.00 N/A X X X X X X 0.75 X X 5 2 1717.50 N/A X X X X X X 0.75 X X 1785.00 N/A X X X X X X 0.75 X X 6 1 3729.60 X 0.56 X X X X 1.00 X X 3330.00 N/A X 1.00 X X X X 1.00 X X N/A = Not Applicable Pall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection
= Outlier
= Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN = Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A( Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing RE = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF = Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads e
Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)
N-S Vertical Safety Factor 1.038 0.415 0.067 3.653
-1.038 -0.415 -0.067 7.048
-1.038 0.415 0.067 3.526 1.038 -0.415 -0.067 7.085 1.038 -0.415 0.067 6.863
-1.038 0.415 -0.067 3.652 1.038 0.415 -0.067 3.787
-1.038 -0.415 0.067 6.819 0.415 1.038 0.067 1.634 10 -0.415 -1.038 -0.067 3.990 0.415 -1.038 0.067 3.976 12 -0.415 1.038 -0.067 1.676 13 -0.415 1.038 0.067 1.643 14 0.415 -1.038 -0.067 4.055 0.415 1.038 -0.067 1.666 16 -0.415 -1.038 0.067 3.912 17 0.415 0.415 0.167 3.816
-0.415 -0.415 -0.167 9.487 19 0.415 0.415 -0.167 4.302 20 -0.415 -0.415 0.167 8.494
-0.415 0.415 0.167 3.838 22 0.415 -0.415 -0.167 9 673 0.416 -0.415 0.167 8.579
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 12 of 12 ID: 1-ABD-A(Rev. 0) Class: 1. Motor Control Centers
==
Description:==
600VAC MCC ABD-A Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE NW REGN OF THE RM, NEAR THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CUTLER-HAMMER 24 Z.415 0.415 -0.167 4.333 Minimum Safety Factor: 1.634.
The Anchorage Capacity is 1.634 times greater than the Demand
- 12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 TTACHHENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Bldg. Location Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
/ II QOCOC.RETG VIE ( P~o 4
L~
0 Q 4 Og p
( 7 E, -v. K E.i Lco'm< G.
Drawn by: Date: l Verified by: Date: ~q~n QuM./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date:
nstructz.on Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
- 12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 TTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Ab F~ c,. i-.. Ce~ Q.~
Unzt I Bldg. Locate.on Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch I ~ ~ r~ 1 I 0 ~
0 CLEi'-; 8) ) / ~r>Z~r-~
I rr 0
ELCJ. /AC+ Lop>W)l'h Z Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date.
Qua1. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: 7 2>>~
nstructzon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
- ' CHP 5021. CCD. 019
.TTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET 4'b C ~ c,. ~.egg P~
Un 3.t g Bldg. Locate.on
- 3"/&-
Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 3-'I 6'-0 t<
cpa pygmy 4p& %%cd P'g) g Qc ~ll LJL~>
A
~5 An~So~
0 l'/i Typ
( ~!
2-'FV>> 1~/A, l 3'/g 0VL fg Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date: >-r~
Qual./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date:
onstructzon Anchor Reve.ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~ I I ~ ~
D ~ ~ II ~ ~
!
0 ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~
~ ~
C ~ ~ l~4
~ - r.
Q P 0
~ ~ R%Ã~%~%~%%%~~~
j IIIIHRIIIIIIIIWH
~ ~
IIINIIIRIIIRRLL I551IIWIIILL
~
o ~
~ eimmmimemrr RRIml%NIRSIj!mLL WRSHHR%WSLL
~~5%~
Wiiiimeemrr 0' I
$~%k%$%R%5%$ %WW
~ II II ~ ~l.~ l I'
alMKWF sC
2 = Plug/Slot Len th = Groove 3
Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
<HZ'es Yes 0 de No No Lack of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration CZb No No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes No No 0 (=
SC(-Qs 4 Wrv ~ a.r <4'. W ~4(nc+ +0 aO KWUQS~Q gh'4e.
UL LQ DCTRIL Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc ron re Date: 7 z fe Reviewed by: Date:
ron nc or eve.ew ngzneer Verified by: era.
f6~~(
or r ;,i>(;!(I;.(r "..I('('((lhI; LI,:V/E!) Date:
ua . npsec 0,:;I",: t !.<(.'i:I..".I "l!i!!Ao(.LLiP 4-'uc i>IJ( 'I ':.:
QQIIIJ( ~
~,. 'age 3 of 3
Equipment No.:
Tightness esvaoxzsned by "Snug Fit" Tightness verified by: ~- ',(
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Comments: 4 Mc~ 9 4c >
) z s
12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 S 5 A DEPARTl4ENT DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTROLLED COPY NO. Uf TRASONXC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: 8 ~ REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit Test Unit/ S/NW Component: Frea./Diameter Item Reference Standard Material Couplant/Batch No.
Other TEST DATA REMARKS Ic' '
c 8'ERFORMED BY: f EVEf:~ DATE:
REVIEWED BY: WD 'VEE: ~ DATE:
FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 OE Revision 0
Equip Xd: 2-CRID-I-CVT Train: 2 Equip Class: 4 Drawing No.: 2-12050 ction: 120 VAC SYSTEM System: 120V CONTROL ROOM XNSTRUMENTATXON DXSTRIBUTXON Equip Desc: 10KVA TRANSFORMER CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Room: 4KV ROOM 600 VOLTS SWITCHGEAR AREA Elev: 609 Sort: S,R Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd:
Support System Drawing: 2-98077, 2-12050 Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served:
MFR: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC.
el: XSL12100 el:
Elem. Drawing: 2-98077 Wiring Drawing: 2-91332 Power Source: 2-EZC-C-5AR Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: TRANSFORMER k
Xso Diawing:
Location: XN THE MIDDLE EAST REGXON OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 633.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00 N/A Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 8.00) N/A Capacity based on: 1.50
- Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00
- Realistic Mean-Centered Floor Response Spectra 1.200
\
/
\
r
/
I
/
LOG /
/
r/
0.085 0.S0 LOG Hz S0.00 Capacity ..... Demand Record Capacity C:tGIPLGIPtspectra.des LabellBounding Spectrum Demand 1 C."tGIP'PROJ0032tspectra.des BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION 633 BROADEN N Demand 2 C:tGIPLPROJ0032tspectra.des BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATIONI633IBROADENN Does capacity exceed demand'
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID: 2-CRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class .'. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM TRN/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes TRN/BS Caveat 2 - Rating of 4.16 KV or Less. Yes Caveat 3- Transformer Coils Postively Restrained Within Cabinet
'RN/BS Yes TRN/BS Caveat 4- Coils Top Braced or Anal zed for Large Transformers. N/A TRN/BS Caveat 5- Clearance Between Energized Component and Cabinet. Yes TRN/BS Caveat 6- Adequate Slack in High Voltage Leads. Yes TRN/BS Caveat 7- Wall-Mounted Units Anchored Close to Enclosure Structure. N/A TRN/BS Caveat 8 - Weak-Way Bending of Thin Webs Evaluated. Yes TRN/BS Caveat 9 - Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together. N/A TRN/BS Caveat 10 - Doors Secured. Yes TRN/BS Caveat 11 - Adequate Anchorage Yes TRN/BS Caveat 12- Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated. N/A TRN/BS Caveat 13 - No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness,'etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes
~
length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete-cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate. Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT'( Rev. 0 ) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility. Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects'P C L D
~CON IE~S SRT: George G. Thomas (S8A) and Satyan Sharma -10/29/92 Anchorage: Anchorage is 1/2" diameter wedge expansion bolts. Most likely they are Phillips anchors based on the Unit 1 GRID-CVT's. Used unknown expansion anchor in ANCHOR analysis for conservatism. Minimum embedment is 2-13/16" above GIP minimum embedment for all types of 1/2" expansion anchors.
Weight estimate based on maximum weight for an inverter in Table C.1-1 of the GIP (configuration similar to an inverter). Weight estimate is 45 Ibs/ft"3.
Weight = (4.5' 2.5' 2.33') x 45 Ibs/ft"3 = 1180 Ib Fluorescent light above unit could come out. However interaction judged non4amaging Thin 3/16" thick angles at base of transformer that is bolted to the base channel is gusseted in two locations. (No weak way bending).
Frequency judged by the SRT to be at least 8 Hz.
ANCHOR analysis indicates an additional factor of safety of 1.97.
Pictures: Zap shot 2629 -Inside Cabinet Zap shot 2630 Outside of Transformer Zap shot 2631 Braced Base Channels
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT ( Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM -600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 Evaluated by: Date:
// <<gz
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
ANCHOR Report
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 P IC~UIRg$
C t
Braced Base Channels Inside Cabinet
'
Outside of Transformer
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE 8uilding: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC 8US 218 SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 ANCHOR Report
~~~use Spectrum:!nstructure Realistic
'esponse Frequency: User - 8.00 Percent Damping: User - 5.00 Spectral Values:
Direction Acceleration (g's)
North - South 0.36 East - West 0.36 Vertical 0.18 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS W~~s'umber of Weights: 1 Porcine No Weight 1 1180.00 14.000 14.250 35.375 Number of External Forces: 0 gl~oe~s Number of External Moments: 0
~llowat~s.
~n~
Number of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf No Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear 'oeff Coeff Fact 1/2 Other Unknown 2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Expansion Anchor
~rgb Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 218 SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 Reduction Factor: 0.85
~W Allowable Stress: 0 psi.
~u Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Comp Comp Comp 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface 0 1 Legend for Anchor Patterns
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 Anchor Bolts:
Concrete Lines: ~Itin Concrete Points: ~mtm W'eld Lines '.
~Ge retry An(QIL' Number of Anchors: 4 Anch Surf No Id Coord Coord Coord Id 1.500 0.750 0.000 26.438 0.750 0.000 1.750 27.750 0.000 26.875 27.750 0.000 ft of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 2 Start Start Sta~ End End End Sf Line No X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord Id Width 0.000 0.891 0.000 28.063 0.891 0.000 1.781 0.000 27.609 0.000 28.000 2 7.609 0.000 1.781 Number of Concrete Points: 0 KeldJ.um 4 of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 er i in u i a o Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 1
OC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 Adequately Installed: Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹2 Adequately Installed: Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹3 Adequately Installed: Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹4 Adequately Installed: Yes Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc PaIV Pallr/
No Id Vali Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM
'
1 1202.25 N/A 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1428.00 N/A 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1202.25 N/A 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT( Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
-
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL1 2100 1428.00 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 1 1202.25 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1428.00 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1202.25 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.OO O.88 1.OO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1428.00 NIA 0.60 1.00 X 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A = Not Applicable I ali = Allowable Pull without Reduced inspection Van = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr = Allowable Puli with Reduced Inspection Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection
= Outlier
= Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage
= Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing
= Reduction Factor for Edge Distance
= Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action
= Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path
= Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)
N-S E-W Vertical Safety Factor 0.362 0.145 0.073 1.969
-0.362 -0.145 -0.073 2.006
-0.362 0.145 0.073 2.009 0.362 -0.145 -0.073 1.971 0.362 -0.145 0.073 1.971
-0.362 0.145 -0.073 2.008 0.362 0.145 -0.073 1.969
-0.362 -0.145 0.073 2.007 0.145 0.362 0.073 3.820
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 11 ID: 2-GRID-I-CVT(Rev. 0) Class: 4. Transformers
==
Description:==
10KVA TRANSFORMER - CONSTANT VOLTAGE Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 4KV RM - 600V SWGR AREA - IN THE MIDDLF EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 7 FEET SOUTH OF 600VAC BUS 21B SUPPLY TRAIN Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SOLIDSTATE CONTROLS INC. ISL12100 10 -0.145 - -0.362 -0.073 4.196 0.145 -0.362 0.073 3.811 12 -0.145 0.362 -0.073 4.198 13 -0.145 0.362 0.073 3.86T 14 0.145 -0.362 -0.073 4.144 15 0.145 0.362 -0.073 4.146 16 -0.145 -0.362 0.073 3.869 17 0.145 0.145 0.183 4.917 18 -0.145 -0.145 -0.183 5.010 19 0.145 0.145 -0.183 4.922 20 -0.145 -0.145 0.183 5.016 21 -0.145 0.145 0.183 5.027 22 0.145 -0.145 -0.183 4.934 23 0.145 -0.145 0.183 4.928 24 -0.145 0.145 -0.183 5.022 Minimum Safety Factor: 1.969 The Anchorage Capacity is 1.969 times greater than the Demand
Coo Component Ão.2 ( ~~~ "T C4T Claca ~
Any particular area tha Sei.smic Review Team should pay extra attention tot Yes W Ho (Xf yes, check items that, apply.)
Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedmentv Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly)
If there is concern for Design Basis Di.screpancy, circle the <<pplicable item and explain.
Harcfvare Haintenance Type Discrepancy Drawing Update Type Di.screpancy S igni.ff cant Operability/Design Basi.s Discrepancy Others Condition:
Actions Taken:
Prepared Sy Dsta ~R-<< 3
- 12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR jNSPECTION DATA SHEET AuK VAv ~
Un1t Location 0'7-'ldg.
/2- ypt4 tR T3 W <~-n-9> 4 Q.Pro-+-C.v w Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 2 -CFiQ- 7=C.VT I ~ II
"'iiÃ7 3II il OS> leaf.
9 clonic)
OV>>
'Pao ~i g tl ELp V. V low Looki'n NoR~h Drawn by: Date: ri zv e>>
Verified by. Q~(
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T Construction Anc or Review Engineer Date: ~ ~ (l- 'l~
Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
- 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Un1t Bldg. Location T3'~-II-9 W Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
+ /a.GYP BoLT EI-BQ- glE,A Lope.<toG- ER Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date:, I~.7- lZ.
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T " 4>'~4~~.
Construction An hor Review Engineer Date:
Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
I
++12 CHP 5021-CCD.Q19 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET VA v ~~ 0 .'g'z5 Un>.t 5 Bldg. Location i>- Sq.7&- t
'I>
7 ~> ~ Y t~".;ll >O )f95 Drawn by:
Verified by:
Reviewed by:
8 Construe 8 (f.
Qual. /Cert. Inspector T. +~'-<k.
won An hor Review Engineer Date:
Date:
Date:
/l 2'.
I Z=l- I Z.
7 Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
- 12 CHP 502 1 . CCD. 0 1.9
( ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET Unxt g /CA+
Bldg.
~g v'P~
Location Dg- g" Fc 5
) ~- 3 q)'o -('))
/ ) %-)l-I) > g Q I O-Z-C.vg Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
'"4') D I:
Ii
~ I l
~
~
I e
I 0 I
-3 II3II ~ rIrJ~)
el I 3 - D'li~
II
- 9'/i).
R'h l= )
l n e ~ + </) p' II'IA::<<U lQ90 Lc'qy, $
Drawn by: Date:
Verified Reviewed by:
b I') (
Qual. /Cert. Xnspector
&<L~I Construction Anchor Review Engineer Date:
Date:
/2 7- "~.
Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
lSSRSSLLLL RSLLL5 WWHRES HWl5WRHS RI - - WLHLL
~RHSSWS~~~~
55%5%5%RHWS.
5%RSWMMMWRI
~~~~~~~M
4*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET Equipment No.: ~. C~ 0- - Dwg No..: ~V~<7 i <-3 q7b-te Steel Dwg. No.: VT'mbedded T ~i~-n- 'I PHYSXCAL CHARACTERXSTXCS Weld XD O'I 4/~
Weld T e Codes T e Size 1 = Fillet 2 = Plug/Slot Len th 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Y s Yes Yes Yes Yes N 0 No No No No Lack of Yes s Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration 0 No No No No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 No No No No Vt."~B )0 18'~
Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes I No T'> u ~~4~~~
ons r c ron e Date:
Reviewed'y: Date: I l.- il-ons r son nc o evxew ngxneer Verified by: n Date: I Z. 7-~ L ua . er . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
S 8 A DEPARTMENT 12 SHP SOSO NDE.008 CONTROL.FO OOCUMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COPY NO.
ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT ZOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: //3:~ ~ REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit /~ Test Unit/ S/N Component Freq./Diameter Item r " J Reference Standard c - '() ~
Material >5 Couplant/Batch No.
Other TEST DATA REMARKS
/, g PERFORMED BY: LEVEL:~ DATE: /
~
REVIEWED BY:
FORM NO. 12 SHP S050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL:
Page 'f Revision 0 DATE:
1 ll
Equipment No.: - CQX'Q-X-C.'d Tightness established by "Snug Fit" Tightness verified by: & (."z <PL
/Cert. Inspector
'ual.
Comments:
01/16/92
>G. MG. 72 sAFE'KvtoouN EGUIpHENT LisT (ssELMp)
FUMCTIOM: CCM Equipment Class: 5 train: 1 Equipment IO: I-PP.IOM Orauing H +bert 1.5135A SyStem: CCM Equip
Description:
LIESt CCM PVHP Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 KALLMAY Elevation: 609 Normal state: R/NR Oesired state: R Pouer Required: Y Sort: M,R Suceorting System Orauing Herbert 1-12001 1-12060 1-98/05 Required Interconnections and Supporting Coeponentst 'I-T11A7 I.HCAB-3 fetv Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Hin/Opt: HIN
(
AOOITIONAL IHFORHATION I
Al ias Hubert Pouer Train: 8 C~nt Served: VEST CCM PVHP Hanufacturer: IHGERSOI.L-RANO CO Hodel: 9000CPH Panel: I-CCM I-HSOI E I cm Orauing: 1-98405 Miring Orauing: 1-93011 Pover Source: 1-1'I IA7, 1-HCAB-3 ual tdount F Relay Only: Y C~nent Type: PVHP ISO Orauings:
Oetai led Location:
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALL AY, Manufacturer, Model; Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM SEISMIC CAPACITY YS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 609.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) Yes
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 20.00) Yes Capacity based on: 1.00
- Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00 Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 0.800 c'OCi
/rr
/
/
//
/r 0.090 0.50 LOG Hz 33.00 Capacity ..... Demand Record Capacity C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.des Label Bounding Spectrum Demand 1 C:tGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des BUILDING Ground(ELEVATIONI608 BROADEN N Demand 2 CAGIPIPROJ0035tspectra.des BUILDINGGround ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID:1-PP-10W(Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM HP/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes HP/BS Caveat 2- Driver and Pump on Rigid Skid Yes HP/BS Caveat 3 - Thrust Bearings in Both Axial Directions Yes HP/BS Caveat 4 - Check of Long Unsupported Piping Yes HP/BS Caveat 5 - Base Vibration Isolation System Checked. Yes HP/BS Caveat 6 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines. Yes HP/BS Caveat 7 - Adequate Anchorage. Yes HP/BS Caveat 8 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated. N/A HP/BS Caveat 9- No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes*
Are anchorage requirements met?
INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects?
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev. 0 } Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM IS E UIPME T SEISMIC LLY DE UATE> ~es CO MEN S SRT: John D. Stevenson, Paul Wilson, Rick Leonard, and Kaifash Mahajan on 10/5/93.
MFG: INGERSOLL-RAND PUMP, 9000 G.P.M.
Anchorage: 6-3/4" J-Bolts.
Total WT=9580 lbs. C.G.=35" above base.
'Minor cracks in non-Struct. pad judged insignificant.
Nozzle loads were applied in the ANCHOR analysis. Nozzle loads were obtained from AEP "
SUMMARY
OF LOAD ON EQUIPMENT" 11/2/71, Summary of Loads on Pumps for CCW Ã1W PUMP, (microfilm page 00100020022) and included deadweight, thermal, thermal anchor movements, and seismic loads.
Ref. Drwgs.: Ingersoll-Rand C-14ALV86X51, W-16ALV500X17, AEPSC 12-3286-9, 12-3073B-2, 12-3073A-3, 12-
~
3285-23, Livsey 8 Co. 1-CCW-37, Rev. 5, Sh. 2 of 2.
~ ~
Picture f/12, Wk1, Tmi, Disk2 Evaluated by: Date:
c- /
Ot 8- ZS- qS tta nt'i
'
u es achm e 0
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM
~
CTUR S 4 ~
L j
4 1-PP-10W West CCW Pump-Anchorage
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM ANCHOR Report
~Ea h ua e:
Response Spectrum: SSE Frequency: GIP - Rigid Percent Damping: GIP - 5.00 Spectral Values:
Direction Acceleration (g's)
North - South 0.38 East - West 0.38 Vertical 0.25 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS
~We'gag of Weights:
'umber 1
No Weight 1 9580.00 105.400 20.750 35.000 o ces Number of External Forces: 2 No Fx Fy Fz 1 2.86E+003 1.24E+003 -3.24E+003 26.870 -5.250 17.000 2 -2.36E+003 2.24E+003 -4.85E+003 26.870 47.750 19.000
/~mme Number of External Moments: 2 No Mx My 1 4.88E+004 1.68E+005 3.34E+004 2 6.32E+004 8.76E+004 -1.60E+004
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Honzontal Pumps
Description:
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM
~
~llowal>les:
~nor'umber of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 3/4 Other J-Bolt (90 7510.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 deg) 15030.00 Gmseng Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.
Reduction Factor: 0.85 Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.
S~ua c~
Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Comp Comp Comp No Nx Ny Nz 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹ 1
t '
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID:1-PP-10W(Rev. 0) Class: 5. Honzontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts: ~IIIK'~
Concrete Lines: ~[~<nggg Concrete Points:
Weld Lines
.'~e Number of Anchors: 6 Anch Surf Id Coord Coord Coord Id 1 1 10.000 4.250 0.000 2 1 59.750 4.250 0.000 3 1 109.500 4.250 0.000 4 1 10.000 37.250 0.000 5 1 59.750 37.250 0.000 6 1 109.500 37.250 0.000 r in
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 1-PP-1 OW ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM
¹ of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 4 Start Start Start End End End Sf Line No X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord Width 8.250 2.625 0.000 129.000 2.625 0.000 1.000 8.250 2.625 0.000 8.250 37.250 0.000 1.000 8.250 37.250 0.000 129.000 37.250 0.000 1.000 129.000 2.625 0.000 129.000 37.250 0.000 1.000 r Pin Number of Concrete Points: 0
¹ of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 D ter inati du on a Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (19.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.00 in.
Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹2 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (19.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.63 in.
Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹3
I D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
Description:
WEST CCW PUMP Oa Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (19.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.00 in.
Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor f/4 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (20.06 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.50 in.
Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 5 I Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (20.00 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.63 in.
Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor f/6 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (19.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=40.88 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.016 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc Pall/ Pallr/
No Id Vali Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 5342.33 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2798.39 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W(Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
Description:
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM 5508,76 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3741.21 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5342.33 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.65 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2798.39 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.37 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5562.31 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.56 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3541.72 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.47 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5586.05 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.55 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3741.21 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 5403.66 NIA 1.00 1.00 0.54 1.00 1.00 0.67 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3347.69 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00 1.00 0.45 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A = Not Applicable Pall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection
= Outlier X = Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN = Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing RE = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF = Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads al is Re Is'nalysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)
'-S No 0.375
-0.375
-0.375 0.375 E-W 0.150
-0.150 0.150
-0.150 Vertical 0.100
-0.100 0.100
-0.100 Safety Factor 3.680 4.948 4.002 4.555
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 11 ID: 1-PP-10W( Rev. 0) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
WEST CCW PUMP Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: INGERSOLL-RAND CO 9000GPM 0.375 -0.150 0.100 4 428
-0.375 0.150 -0.100 4.181 0.375 0.150 -0.100 3.741
-0.375 -0.150 0.100 4.641 0.150 0.375 0.100 2.376 10 -0.150 -0.375 -0.100 3.601 0.'I50 -0.375 0.100 3.403 12 -0.150 0.375 -0.100 2.503 13 -0.150 0.375 0.100 2.479 14 0.150 -0.375 -0.100 3.448 15 0.150 0.375 -0.100 2.400
-0.150 -0.375 0.100 3.418 0.150 0.150 0.250 4.907 18 -0.150 -0.150 -0.250 7.950 19 0.150 0.150 -0.250 5.450 20 -0.150 -0.150 0.250 6.260 21 -0.150 0.150 0.250 4.909 22 0.150 -0.150 -0.250 7.606 23 0.150 -0.150 0.250 6.417 24 -0.150 0.150 -0.250 5.768 Minimum Safety Factor: 2.376 The Anchorage Capacity is 2.376 times greater than the Demand
- 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHNENT NO . 1 ANCHOR NSPECTXON DATA SHE
.. Unxt Bldg. Zocatzon I- t -
at>.on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. iow'nstal Anchora e Arran ement Sketch X- PP-(ox
'IO <'- z'l~ "l-3 l~
0 0 $ ~/~"
~$ cJ cP I I IN
+0 I
A 0 pk 8
"I- 3.VI INOIANA MICHIGA 'Efi SITE OESIGN CON RC WORKING C jUL 201 LERKT Drawn by: Date: t"- /Z V/ ~Z.
Verified by: Date:
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by. Date:
.Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 3
~~ Jd ('HJ 502 J CCD. Qlg
~
ATTACHMENT NO. l CHOR NSP CT ON DATA SHE CG RAh Unit Bldg. Locat1'on X- PP-lnvl Installation dwg. / Rev. Equ1pment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INOIANA IIICIIIGANP0%'R SITE DESIGN CONTROLLcO WORKING COPY JUL 201995 LERK +
Drawn by: Date: / zl Verified by: Date:
Qual. /Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: r- Date: 1 l I <2 Construct1on chor Rev1ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision
ATTACHMENT NO.
ANCHOR ZNSPECTXON DATA S O I A Unxt Bldg. Location
-5 8t'o-'t g- I P- IQWf Znstallatz.on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Q l)~z-INOIANA IAICHIGAN POVIER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY
)Ut. 20 $ 9SK FLE,U. Ux.ew uonxx.ea ~urn+
LERK T Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date: +-lF-Qua ./Cert:. Xn pector Reviewed by: Dat 1-('i-9 x Construction nchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision
0 J4 QJ4L Vv4 4 ~ QPP gd y
.TTACHMZNT Np.
Equipment No.: - PP- 'IO~ Dwg No .:
Anchor type: ~ oi - ~YPE. Z, Dia: Dwg No.: l2: 3A3g Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: Cal, Due Date:
Tightness verified? 0 Yes 0 No Nk'ns Date: 2 ruc ion Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes g, No Date:
ons ruc 1 n ARE Bolt ID Comments Gaps Anchor len th Protruding <g fI v'1" Il fq-len th .~
Embedment 3 ~
Bolt- P
- 'In<i" ~~
~r~'a r1 Concrete condition 4, KDc.E, oe Edge Qo<- ~TK'XC.T.
distance Pac g'lq'A~
~ I Anchor Z-5q 2:5~( Z.-'3
~
s acin 2- Sg Anchor Q< Q<
an larit Q~ Oa OK Og Thread Qa g. Qa Q< O< OK engagement Comments: DR.x, C s ~ o - S~aucv. P V erified by:
Q a ./Cert. Inspector Revieved by: IHOIAHA MIC4IGAW POWER Date:
Construct1on WORKlt(G COPY JUL 20 1993 ago 2 of 3 e r ion 3
& A DEPARTMENT NO.~
S SHP 5050 NDE pp8 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ATTACHNEHT NO.
CopY ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: u-aO~i9 REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit On c Test Unit/ S/N 4 Component J - 7'P- )0 0 Frey./Diameter Jjz.
Item Reference Standard 4 -8 Material Couplant/Batch No. 4 <./
TEST DATA REMARKS wA-'~
4 PERFORMED BY: I.EVEE'~ DATE:
REVIEWED BY; I EVEI:~ DATE:
FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip Xd: 2-PP-46-4 Train: 1 Equip Class: 5 Drawing No.: 12-5131 12-5131A tion: RI Syst: em: BORON MAKEUP (CVCS)
Equip Desc: BORIC ACXD STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP g4 Building: AUXILXARY Room: BORXC ACID STORAGE TANK AREA Elev: 587 Sort: S,R Notes:
Normal State: NR Desired State: R Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 2-12010 2-98272 Req'd Support Comp: 2-AB-A-1D Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: B
,Comp Served: BAST MFR: GOULDS PUMPS XNC.
Mo el: 3196 1: 2-BA 2-HSD2 Elem. Drawing: 2-98272 Wiring Drawing: 2-94217 Power Source: 2-AB-A-1D Walkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: PUMP Iso Drawing: 0-DR-724
'ocation: XN THE MXDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET OF MXDDLE BORIC ACXD STORAGE TANK 'OUTHEAST 512-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
Description:
BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP f/4 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKIt/12-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC. 3196 SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 587.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) N/A
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 20.00) N/A Capacity based on: 1.50 " Bounding Spectrum
- 5. Demand based on: 1.00 Realistic Median-Centered Floor Response Spectra 1.200 l
I
\
I \
I II LOG I I
I
/j I
- r~
0.080 0.50 LOG Hz 50.00 Capacity ..... Demand File Record Capacit C:tGIP>GIP'Lspectra.des Label(Bounding Spectrum Demand 1 C:tGIPIPROJ0034tspectra.des BUILDINGAuxilia IELEVATION587IBROADEN(N Demand 2 C:tGIPIPROJ0034'Lspectra.des BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADENIN Does capacity exceed demand?
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
Description:
BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP &
Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK 012-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC. 3196 CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM HP/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes HP/BS Caveat 2- Driver and Pump on Rigid Skid. Yes HP/BS Caveat 3 - Thrust Bearings in Both Axial Directions Yes HP/BS Caveat 4 - Check of Long Unsupported Piping. Yes HP/BS Caveat 5 - Base Vibration Isolation System Checked Yes HP/BS Caveat 6 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines. Yes HP/BS Caveat 7 - Adequate Anchorage. Yes HP/BS Caveat 8 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated. N/A HP/BS Caveat 9 - No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum7 ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes.
length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated.
~ Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP I/4 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANK AREA - IN THE MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANK012-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC. 3196 INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targ'ets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or NIA structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility. Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes ls equipment free of interaction effects?
IS E U P ENTSEISIVIICA Y D U T ~Ys COMMEN S SRT: John D. Stevenson, Paul Wilson, Rick Leonard, and kailash Mahajan on 10/05/93.
GOULDS PUMP.
Anchorage Four 5/8" diameter Ram anchor expansion bolts.
Pump WT 511lbs, C.G=12 3/8" above base.
The 5/8" diameter expansion anchors have 4" embedment into the base concrete below the 8" pad, per the anchorage inspection.
This judged adequate by the SRT for the light (511 (bs) pump.
Attached piping is 2" or less. Nozzle toads judged not to be a problem by the SRT.
Picture 0 49, Wk1, Tm1, Disk1.
Evaluated by: Date:
achm t: Pictures
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 4 ID: 2-PP-46-4 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 5. Horizontal Pumps
==
Description:==
BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKS TRANSFER PUMP N4 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: BORIC ACID STOR TANKAREA - IN THF MIDDLE EAST REGION OF THE ROOM, 15 FEET SOUTHEAST OF MIDDLE BORIC ACID STORAGE TANKf/12-TK-12M, NEAR THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GOULDS PUMPS INC. 3196 ICTUR S Boric Acid Storage Tank Transfer Pump 2-PP-46A-
~
Anchors
Coo Component No. Claaa Any payticular prea the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attention tot Yam ~ No W (If yea, check items that apply. )
Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread~Engagement Anchor Grip Angularity v'nchor Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly}
If there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.
- 1. Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Drawing Up&,te Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Doaign Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:
l4 Actions Taken:
PreI ared By T Data
- (* '. CHP 5021.CCD.019 ZTACHMENT NO. 1 NCHOR NS ECTION DATA SH E l TO A I= %ASK A,Re.I'-.
Unxt Bl g. Location Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch M5QLATi CIA Ol I l
(
AP)Chorq CcO!
l ARE Z~<<~
(
fyZ V)IR:P.
I I
1 I
I l
',O'- ',OI gI l
Ol All /I J/C.IIORq+g Pf r ~ I J PLA-rE >g pPz x pP~ ~~
/>>'o" INQIANA hIICHIGhN POwFR SITE DESIGN CONTRQI.LEO WORKING COPY
/-'8Ã" JUL t Z t995 PL%,M VIKVf I.ERK T Drawn by:
Verified by:
Reviewed by:
Qua 7'ate:
./Cert. Inspector
~
Construction
~
An hor Revs,ew Engineer Date:
Date:
Page 1 Revision of 1
3
~ ~ ~
~ ~ l ~ ~
~ ~ r
~ %~1
~ II o R%WWK~%WW&&
C4541%1LHLL KlSSWL1%%L
~LISWLRSL 5%5%WKRILSL
~
s ~
~
mmWSLLXLL
~HRRKR'%%saaslmMMM&i&
5%L%SKRRLR Ir 4 a r ik JSC~r i ~
- pp '> T]ig,lg l ( 2 SHP 50SO NDE.008 DOCui4&4T ATTACHMENT NO. 1
("~ i'!":iROLl.E%
I UK TRASON C TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REQUEST NO. /A IDENTIFICATION P.s Unit Test, Unit/ S/N Component Freq./Diameter DS /
Item Reference Standard Material Couplant/Batch No.g l4 Other 5 TEST DATA REMARKS nc r PERFORMED BX: :~Z- '3 REUIEMED BY:
FORM NO. 12 SHP SOSO NDE.008-1 Page 1 of Revision 0
Database: K:SSEL1B.DBF Equip XD: 1-HV-AFP-M1 Train: 2 Equip Class:9 ing No.: 12-5148B ction: HVAC System: TURBXNE BUXLDXNG VENTXLATION Equip Desc:. EAST MOTOR DRXV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBXNE Room: EAST MOTOR DRIV. AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM Elev: 591 Sort: S,R Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 1-12030 1-98214 Req'd Support Comp: 1-AB-D-R2D Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt:
MIN'lias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: EAST MOTOR DRXV AUX FEED PUMP MFR:
1: 10000 FT 3/MIN Panel:
Elem. Drawing: 1-98214 Wiring Drawing: 1-94228 Power Source: 1-AB-D-R2D Walkdown: F Relay Eval Y Comp Type: VENT FAN Xso Drawing:
Location: XN THE SW CORNER OF THE ROOM, 10'W OF EAST MDAFWP, ON THE WEST WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLOOR.
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of3 ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 9. Fans
Description:
EAST MOTOR DRIV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV AUX FDWTR PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'W OF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLR.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURINGCO. 10000 FT"3/MIN ~
SEISMIC CAPACITYVS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 591.00
- 2. Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) Yes Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 10.00) Yes
- 4. Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum
- 5. Demand based on: 1.00 " Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 0.000 LOG
/
r r
r 0.090 0.50 LOG Hz 33.00, Capacity ..... Demand File Record Capacit C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.des Label Bounding Spectrum Demand 1 C:LGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des BUILDINGGround ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Demand 2 CAGIPLPROJ0035tspectra.des BUILDING Ground ELEVATIONI608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand'
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 9. Fans
==
Description:==
EAST MOTOR DRIV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV AUX FDWTR PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'W OF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLR.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURINGCO., 10000 FT"3/MIN CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM FAN/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes FAN/BS Caveat 2 - Drive Motor and Fan Mounted on Common Base. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 3 - Long Shafts Supported at Fan and at Motor. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 4 - No Possibility of Excessive Duct Distortion Causing Binding or Misalignment Yes of Fan.
FAN/BS Caveat 5 - Base Vibration Isolation System Checked N/A FAN/BS Caveat 6 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 7 - Adequate Anchorage. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 8 - No Other Concerns Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum7 ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the. base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate. Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-HV-AFP-M1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 9. Fans
==
Description:==
EAST MOTOR DRIV AUX FEEDWATER PUMP ROOM EXHAUST FAN Building: TURBINE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E MOTOR DRIV AUX FDWTR PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 10'W OF E MDAFWP, ON THE W WALL, 12'BOVE THE FLR.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: JOY MANUFACTURINGCO., 10000 FT"3/MIN INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or NIA structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects'P S U
~CIELIRXR SRT: Gary Thomas, Gunnar Harstead and Harry Young on 10/20/93.
Anchorage: .
Fan mounted to embedded plate structure with at least 16 steel to steel bolts at least 1/2" in diameter.
Weight of fan 500 lbs.
No anchorage calculation required for a fan of this size with this robust anchorage. Therefore anchorage is OK based on SRT judgement and inspection.
Interaction:
Insulated pipe running outside the room the fan services could impact the outside screen of the fan. Pipe well insulated and will cushion the impact, therefore the SRT judged this as non4amaging.
Photo: Fan mounted outside the room with the damper on the inside, therefore could not get a good picture of fan.
Evaluated by: Date:
0 2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET TuRsit4P. OI4VW /gal Pq<~'T ~~a,l 2 h&ogC R.oat FCMg v)ATCR. Paine poenh SauTuMCsT c~IM Unct I Bldg. Location i 2.-5(:8 i- t<-V- hFP-Mi Xnstallatxon dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Dla4~ ON'5'p
( g FP-Old7 Q SuP PO T ~.
Drawn by: Date: ~'- 8-~1~
Verified by: Hh Date:
Qual. /Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by Anal~ Date: ).- <) -~( 3 Construction Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
Database: K:SSEL1B.DBF Eguip ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Train: 2 Equip Class:9 wing No.: 12-5148B ction: HVAC System: SCREENHOUSE VENTXLATXON Equip Desc: UNIT Q1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTXLATION FAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Room: EAST ESW PUMP ROOM Elev: 591 Sort: S,R Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 1-12033 1-98415 Req'd Support Comp: 1-PS-D-2B Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: EAST ESW PUMP MFR: BUFFALO FORGE CO l: 5000 FT"3/MIN Panel:
Elem. Drawing: 1-98415 1-98721 Wiring Drawing: 1-95103 Power Source: 1-PS-D-2B Walkdown: F Relay Eval : Y Comp Type: VENT FAN Xso Drawing:
Location: IN THE SW CORNER OF THE ROOM, 15'E OF EAST ESW PP, THE FLOOR. 13'BOVE
l~
I
D.C. COOK Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS)
'IP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Status: Yes Sheet1 of11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT 41 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SE OF E ESWPP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where e ui ment receives seismic in ut 587.00 Elevation of seismic in ut below about 40'rom rade rade = 608.00 N/A
- 3. E ui menthasfundamentalfre uenc aboveabout8Hz est.fre uenc =10.00 N/A Ca acit based on: 1.50'Boundin S ectrum Demand based on: 1.00
- Realistic Median-Centered Floor Res onse S ectra 1.200 l
'
\
\\
I I \
LOG I r jr 0.080 0.50 LOG Hz 50.00 Capacity ..... Demand File Record Ca aci C:tGIP<GIPIs ra.des Label Boundin S trum Demand 1 C:(GIPIPROJ0035ls .des BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Demand 2 C:(GIPPROJ003Qs lra.des BUILDINGAuxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand? Yes
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT N EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM FAN/BS Caveat 1- Earth uake Ex erience E ui ment Class Yes FAN/BS Caveat 2- Drive Motor and Fan Mounted on Common Base. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 3- Lon Shafts Su orted at Fan and at Motor. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 4- No Possibility of Excessive Duct Distortion Causing Binding or Yes Misali nment of Fan.
FAN/BS Caveat 5- Base Vibration Isolation S stem Checked N/A FAN/BS Caveat 6- Sufficient Slack and Flexibilit of Attached Lines. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 7 - Ade uate Anchora e. Yes FAN/BS Caveat 8- No Other Concerns Yes ts the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum' Yes ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes dam in, center of rotation .
- 3. The t e of anchora e is covered b the GIP. Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, Yes nuts and washers, ex ansion anchor ti htness, etc.
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: Yes embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete crackin .
- 6. For bolted anchora es, an a s under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for ex ansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. Thestren th of thee ui mentbaseand the load athto the CG isade uate. Yes
- 10. The ade uac of embedded steel, rout ads or la e concrete ads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchora e ca acit exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met7 Yes INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft tar ets are free from im act b nearb e ui mentorstructures. Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have ade uate flexibilit . Yes
- 4. Overhead e ui ment or distribution s stems are not likel to colla se. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes ls equipment free of interaction effects? Yes
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALLIATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, THE FLR. 13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLYADEQUATE'P Yes COMMENTS SRT: Gary Thomas, Gunnar Harstead and Harry Young on 10/19/93.
Capacity vs Demand:
Component is in Screenhouse building using Auxiliary building Response Spectra for calculation Anchorage:
Fan sits on steel platform, bolted to the wall on two sides with 2- 3/4" through bolts on each side, and hung at opposite corner by a 4x4x3/8" angle.
Calculation should be rerun. This fan is the limiting analysis fo 12-HV-ESW-1,2,3,4,5,6,7,&8 Anchorage is adequate. The calculated anchorage safety factor is 32.8.
Photo: Wk. 2, Tm. 2, Disk 1, Picture 29 Fan; 30 Underside of frame showing two bolts to wall; 31 Top of angle
~ ~
hanger support for platform.
Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
ANCHOR Re ort
0 D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92 SCREENING EVAI UATION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT P1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN 1 Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN PICTURES Figure 1: Fan 12-HV-ESW-7 Figure 2: Underside of frame showing two bolts to wall Figure 3: Top of angle hanger support for platform
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE F,loor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN ANCHOR Report Response Spectrum: SSE Frequency: GIP - Flexible Percent Damping: GIP - 5.00 Spectral Values:
Direction Acceleration 's North - South 0.60 East - West 0.60 Vertical 0.25 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS
~Wei htn:
Number of Weights: 1 No Wei ht 1 500.00 35.000 23.000 18.000 Forces:
Number of External Forces: 0 Moments:
Number of External Moments: 0 Allowables:
Anchor:
Number of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf No. Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'EOF E ESW PP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN 1 3/4 Other Grouted In 1500.00 7510.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Place Concrete:
Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.
Reduction Factor: 0.85 Weld:
Allowable Stress: 31200 psi.
Surfaces:
Number of Surfaces: 2 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Com Com Com No N Nz 0.000 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.'000 0.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹ 1 Anchor Pattern for Surface //2
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts:
Concrete Uncs:
~mm Concrete Points:
Weld Uncs:
Geometrei:
Anchor:
Number of Anchors: 4 Anch Surf No. Id Coord Coord Coord Id 1 16.100 46.000 4.000 2 1 52.600 46.000 4.000 3 70.000 41.300 4.000 4 1 70.000 4.800 4.000 Concrete Lines:
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591:00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'EOF E ESW PP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN
¹ of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 2 start start start End End End Line No X-Coo rd Y-Coo rd Z-Coo rd X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord Id Width 0.000 46.000 4.000 70.000 46.000 4.000 1 3.000 70.000 0.000 4.000 70.000 46.000 4.000 2 3.000 Concrete Points:
Number of Concrete Points: 0 Weld Lines:
¹ of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Determination of Reduction Factors:
Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: ( 7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹2 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: ( 7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.06 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹3 Adequately Installed: Yes
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT f/1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'E OF E ESW PP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN Embedment Length: ( 7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.13 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor input for Anchor 0 4 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment I.ength: (7.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 7.50 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.13 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 6.63 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc Pall/ Pallr/
No Vali Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 1500.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7510.00 N/A 'l.oo 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1500.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7510.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1500.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7510.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 1500.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00
?510.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1,00
~Le eed:
N/A = Not A licable Pall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Ins ection Vail = Allowable Shear without Reduced Ins ection Pallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Ins ection Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Ins ection
= Outlier
= Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for T e of Anchora e RN = Reduction Factor for Installation Ade uac RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Ga at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for S acin
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT N EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESWPP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN
= Reduction Factor for Ed e Distance RF = Reduction Factor for Concrete Stren th RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Reta s RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and P in Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Stren th and Load Path
= Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads Anal sis Results:
Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular S ectral Accelerations G's No N-S E-W Vertical Safet Factor 0.600 0.240 0.100 44.553
-0.600 -0.240 -0.100 59.948
-0.600 0.240 0.100 77.054 0.600 -0.240 -0.100 50.897 0.600 -0.240 0.100 48.716
-0.600 0.240 -0.100 59.565 0.600 0.240 -0.100 49.641
-0.600 -0.240 0.100 106.184 0.240 0.600 0.100 31.796 10 -0.240 -0.600 -0.'I 00 53.068 0.240 -0.600 0.100 91.151 12 -0.240 0.600 -0.100 32.444 13 -0.240 0.600 0.100 33.585 14 0.240 -0.600 -0.100 56.103 15 0.240 0.600 -0.'I00 33.321 16 -0.240 -0.600 0.100 87.648 0.240 0.240 0.250 56.453 18 -0.240 -0.240 -0.250 59.642
't9 0.240 0.240 -0.250 /6.162 20 -0.240 -0.240 0.250 205.015 21 -0.240 0.240 0.250 67.138 22 ~ 0.240 -0.240 -0.250 67.333 0.240 -0.240 0.250 76.365 24 -0.240 0.240 -0.250 59.986 Minimum Safety Factor: 31.796
D.C. COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 11 ID: 12-HV-ESW-7 Rev. 0 Class: 9. Fans Descri tion: UNIT ¹1 EAST ESW PUMP ROOM SUPPLY VENTILATIONFAN Building: SCREENHOUSE Floor El.: 591.00 Room, Row/Col: E ESW PUMP RM, IN THE SW CORNER OF THE RM, 15'SEOF E ESW PP, THE FLR.
13'BOVE Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BUFFALO FORGE CO., 5000 FT"3/MIN The Anchorage Capacity is 31.796 times greater than the Demand
Coo Component No. I'Z" & G~+- 1 Cla>>a particular prea the Any Yes No v'Lfye>>, Seismic Review Team>>hould pay extra check item>> that apply.)
attontion to7 Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Other>> (describe brief].y)
If there i>> concern. for Desi.gn Basis Discrepancy, circle tho applicable item and explain.
- l. Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Drawing Update Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Do>>ign Basis Discrepancy Others Condi tion:
Actions Taken:
Prepared By ~'aca ~5>'" 3
- c' CHP @021. CCD. 019
. ZTACHNENT NO. 1 NCHOR XNSPECTION DATA SHEE O(v E. M ea 4o~
Unxt Bldg. Location iZ- 9-ES -7 Xnstallatxon dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch I (OIAi~A MlCHIQAy POWER rAu &r SITE i)ES I'H CO ITROLLEO WORKIIIQ COPY JUL >S tsSS
<<RZ l.
DETAIL A DETAIL(I 0
(0 CoHPon(EQ r I8 I'-ITTAC'AGO T(o /V Cu~l QZ'Q 'P I ATE a~ (~) zz"p5
~-as'~+~1rI I
I 3-P I
cj(((I((VB AprlrI,E F-(I (I
l~
8 eche ~4AL
~/A" B.<T't /)~i(J oo o
~f(pf,Q oP Top Drawn by:
Verified b Date:
Qual. /Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: pate. F-RI- t 3 Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
- l2CHP 5021.CCD.019 I 'TACHMENT NO. 1 NCHOR INSPECTXON DATA SHEET c.Yc.t Quod 0 ~ E U 7 oow Unzt ~
Bldg. Location IZ,- Av- F>g-7 Xnstallatz.on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
\
Ow
~I I
I-~+/6 I. f 'THRV Cbo'Erb 7YP. Z I
I I
I
'I lo Yig I IOIANA h'ICHIGAIJ POP,'/II Sl fF. OCSIGH CONTROLLED YIORKIIIG COPY EL'E.V lEw'w Meir JUL tg19SS
. LCRK ~
Drawn by: Date: Y /2 q Verified b Date: 'PD Qual. /Cert. Inspector
~ ~
Reviewed by:
~
~ T ~
Construct>on A chor Review Engineer Date: ~ <'-'I~
Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
i
~2 CHP 5021 - CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 bNcHQR NSPECTION DATA SHEET E Few Q~
Unct Bldg. Locatzo Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Top Wgo sps ipc Pbi77u~ IV'2Z WwACcc:ssibt 8 Pi@
~ TOP Mc) xwsoC vc Q II1vg I
I 4/iS' 0 M
)
I 4/iy V
I d
~
I I
4'ib Z"
I 'I~
5/
TOP Qi~
POp Wc v ZJlMg VV lbvt48~
~S<QQ BO77~
Mib
+i@ fi 7I 7 7<. L>>" 7c" I/u" PLtI Y-e iS S Ti Y'CS WE't DED YO rv >c L.
Tnt')'Lr IttDIANA MICiIIGQN PPWt R Sc CHANNEL IS bta SITC PESld't( CONTROLLt.J 87'FNos AnlQ 'vT WORKING COPY HEEDED VOLrt-TI cr>>
f UL 1g tSSS
~ pRg T~E'WPD n'rawn by: Date:
Verified
~
by
~
Qual. /Cert. Inspector
~ ~
Reviewed by: T, Date: ') "2.I- Qg Construct>.on A chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
- " 2 CHP 5021- CCD 019
~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 NC OR INSPECTIO D TA S E C/8 N uSE F.. FSM R> iP oe
.Unxt Bldg. Location 4 -7 Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch C.
0 gA" /Z. /Q" /g "
O>Oy ECT VIe& AA 0'5'~ '~ '+,>,~C, o tQg+>',:< -',~l8"+: ~ W.A ~ %~XI'>"5'I (rd S '4~ ~ )'>-4 <J~ -56 AntChoI POWER SITE OESlut< CONTfiOLLEO WORKING COPY lUL 1519S5 LCRK Drawn by: Date:
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date:
Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~ ~
e ~ ~ a ~ ~ e s ~
~ ~ ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~
o 14
~ 9 ~
t 5%RRSRSHKLP MWWMMM&W R%1%RRRRSL MMWMMMW&
RSRSSWRHLL 555%655%%LL R5%%%5%%88~~~~
5555WRIHHSE 54WWHRRSRI
%8%Ã%R4%~~M5%K'WWMMMWW P
t 4 P C.
4 4
c V
'12 CHP 5021. CCD. 03.9 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Equipment No.: IZ- AV'- Dwg No.': Iz.-$ 4 82-7 Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Weld ID ~i M~ w'~ w Weld T e Codes T e / /
1 = Fillet Size ~/i<"
2 = Plug/Slot Len th / 3/ / '/y" = Groove 3
Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Y s 57@ dRP cHZP QRD Lack of Ye's Yes Yes Yes Yes +Ys Yes Yes Penetration @HE c85 429 CPS Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes cHZP . 895 <HE lhQIAt(A te1ICH~GA I POII~R SlTE OrSlGH CONTROLLED WORKING COPY JUL t~199~
LrPg T ~ CA Equipment base flexible: G Yes 8 No ons ruc on re Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
ns ruc 1on c or ev1ew ng1neer verified
~
by: g-Ah- 93 ua .~ er .~ npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
(
12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR TNSPECTXON DATA SHEET quipment No.: l~-/-r V'- E'SV Dwg No.: t+-W 4BZ.-7 Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: h PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Weld XD w'io Weld T e Codes T e 1 = Fillet Size 'lie.
2 = Plug/Slot Len th 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 4lZP CfB KD Lack of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration Yes'RAN Ch Porosity Yes Yes Yes Qes liVOIANA h".CH IGnN PO)".ER SITE OFSICH COlITROaa.EL'CRNlIt(C CCRC'UI.
>g]995
-tres T ~~
Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5 No T ons ruc 1o re Date: 0- >>- 'l'3 Reviewed by: Date: b-2,(- f2 ons ruc 1on nc or ev1ew ng1neer Verified by:
~ ~
Date:
ua . er . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
C'2 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO- 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET quipment No.: / Z Dwg No..'Z-WC SZ-~
Steel Dwg. No.:
A'mbedded gh PHYSlCAL CHARACTERISTICS Weld XD Weld T e Codes T e Size 3/ 3/ 1 = Fillet 2 = Plug/Slot Len th 3" 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Yes s Yes 0 0 Lack of Yes Yes @Ys Yes s s s Yes Penetration 0 Porosity ges Yes Yes Cb INDI/(JA >.',~Q<ICAN PP;ygII SITC O~SlCN CONT(IDLI.ED YYDIIKIIICCQP'f lUL ~q 199" Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5 No on ruc x n re Date '2I Reviewed by:
on ruc >on nc o evxew ngxneer V rified by: ua . er . npsec or Date:
Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR XNSPECTXON DATA SHEET quipment No.: 2- Sld- 7 Dwg No.: Z-W Z-7 Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: g-3L8~
PHYSXCAL CHARACTERXSTXCS Held XD 4JZ IJ~L 4AV Weld T e Codes T e Size 1 = Fillet 2 = Plug/Slot Len th 7'Fq 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes es Yes CKb No Lack of kS'es Yes 855 Yes Yes Yes cRED Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration c55'es QRI drab No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes B5 cd& mz . Hh No QEhlOTES An/ XII $ 4O~AJW uJEL A.
INOIANA tIICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY JUL >~ 1995
.LEAK 7 Eguipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8-No ons uc zo re Reviewed by: Date:
ons ruc son or evzew ngxneer Verified by: Date: Y-<-9'3 ua . er . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
II 1
.A.DEPARTMENT SHP 5050 NDE.008 S 8 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTPOLLED DOCUtvlciNT COPY NO. 3 -l ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: /8 REPORT DATE: 4-/- '73 REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit Test Unit/ S/N > (wS'r.'- 5'2F- P~
Component -FS i~~ " Freq./Diameter 7 zsZ~
C- P Item n /i Material /<
Reference Standard Couplant/Batch No. '=. c/ ~
~7aZ Other 5 TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: : ~3 REVIEWED BY:
FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 LEVEL: ~
Page 1 of DATE:
1
~ ///+
Revision 0
Equip XD: 1-AFW Train: 2 Equip Class: 14 Drawing No.: 1-12035 sction: 120 VAC SYSTEM stem: 120/208V MISC. SAFTEY RELATED POWER DXSTRIBUTXON J
Equip Desc: POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DXESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes:
,Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd:
Support System Drawing:
Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served:
Mfr: POWER ELECTRIC INC.
Model:
E em. Drawing: 1-98215 Wiring Drawing: 1-95022 Power Source: 1-ABD-C-2A Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: DISTRIBUTXON PANEL XSO Drawing:
Location: 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR gl-OME-150-CD( ON THE NORTH WALL
DC Cook Unit1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/1 4/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 3 ID: 1-AFW ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 14. Distribution Panels
==
Description:==
POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY F(oor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR C1-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 587.00 Flevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) Yes Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = ) SRT Capacity based on: 1.00 'ounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00
- Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 0.000 r
LOG //
//
/
/
//
0 090 0.50 LOG Hz 33.00 Capacity ..... Demand File Record Capacity C:tGIPtGIPtspectra.des Label Bounding Spectrum Demand 1 C:LGIPIPROJ0031tspectra.des BUILDINGGroundlELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Demand 2 C:tGIPtPROJ0031tspectra.des BUILDINGGround(ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-AFW ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 14. Distribution Panels
==
Description:==
POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR f/1-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM DP/BS Caveat I - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes DP/BS Caveat 2 - Contains only Circuit Breakers and Switches Yes DP/BS Caveat 3 - Doors Secured. Yes DP/BS Caveat 4 - Adjacent Cabinets Bolted Together. N/A DP/BS Caveat 5 - General Configuration Similar to NEMA Standards. Yes DP/BS Caveat 6 - Adequate Anchorage Yes DP/BS Caveat 7 - Potential Chatter of Essential Rela s Evaluated. N/A DP/BS Caveat 8 - No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'7 ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 . Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been'considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate. Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. N/A
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-AFW( Rev. 0) Class: 14. Distribution Panels
==
Description:==
POWER PANEL Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, 10 FEET NW OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR 81-OME-150-CD, ON THE N WALL Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: POWELL ELECTRIC INC.
INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects?
S'E I NT ES C L Y DE U E SRT: George Gary Thomas (S&A) and Tom Huang (AEP) on 10/7/1993 Ref. 1: Anchor Inspection Data Sheet: Anchorage Arrangement Sheet, 1/21/93.
Ref. 2: Dwg 0 1-12035-12 (internal components dwg).
Capacity:
BSCav.2: Verified by walkdown and Ref. 2.
Anchorage:
Wall mounted panel with dimensions: 36"Hx20Wx6"Deep. Anchorage was not accessible.
Panel estimated to weigh less than 50 lbs. Tug tested by G. Thomas to at least 100 Ibs, OK; therefore, no explicit anchorage evaluation necessary.
Evaluated by: Date:
12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019
(
ATTACENENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET COE E gg I, Un>.t Bldg. Location Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch t-a" PHOO uuislr<<k 1-'8" C~lr ( YI'I'.)
r
&AQUI!M )qua%
lo un,pl~
CASa)~) I'-8wZ-II8! <<5 /8
~~ 8 l lvI I
(~)
5Ctcwg ~/~ssl cps LJII tC H II'IDIMIt,'!CHICA,I~W~II Cd/AEc.f. un:sic<<I, H ufo'A. GITE DESIGII COII TIIOU.'60 (9'rP) VFORXING COPY APH 0 8 tS93
..I.EAK Drawn by: 7-verified by- Date:
ual./ ert. nspector Reviewed b Date: 1- ~I-'l3 Construction A chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
g
~-
eemseaarx RRRRRSRSHHEL RSRSRRRRMML&
WRRRSHHHRL QSSISLRLS HRRRRRRLLLL MWWWWW&W RWRlWRHSL W558WRLEL MWWWWMW& I k i 0 f
~J4>
~ ~
Database: K:SSEL2C.DBF Equip ID: 2-BATT-AB Train: 1 Equip Class:15 ywing No.: 2-12003 nction: 250 VDC SYSTEM System: 250VDC DISTRXBUTXON Equip Desc: PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB BATTERY EQUIPMENT AREA Elev: 609 Sort: S,R Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd:
Support System Drawing: 2-98055, 2-12003 Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: B Comp Served:
MFR: C 6 D BATTERIES l: LC-25 Panel: 2-BC-AB Elem. Drawing: 2-98055 Wiring Drawing: 2-91012, 2-91301 Power Source: 2-TDAB-5 Walkdown: C Relay Eval : Y Comp Type: BATTERY, *RHR WALKDOWN COMPONENT Iso. Drawing:
Location: IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2114/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: No Sheet 1 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
==
Description:==
PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AS BATTERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CBD Power Systems LC-25 Cells SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 609.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) Yes
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 8.00) SRT Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum
- 5. Demand based on: 1.00 " Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 0.850 LIN r r I
~1 r
r er
~ t 0.000 1.00 LOG Hz 33.00 Capacity ~.... Demand Record Capactt HAGIPtGIPtspectra.des Label Bounding Spectrum Demand 1 H:tGIPtPROJOOSStspectra.des BUILDING Ground Spectrum ELEVATION BROADEN Demand 2 H:tGIPV'ROJ0058tspectra.des BUILDING Ground Spectrum ELEVATION BROADEN Does capacity exceed demand'
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: No Sheet 2 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
==
Description:==
PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AG BATTERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: CSD Power Systems LC-25 Cells CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM BAT/BS Caveat I - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes BAT/BS Caveat 2 - Battery Cell Plates are Lead-Calcium Flat-Plate, Plante, or Manchex Yes Design.
BAT/BS Caveat 3- Each Individual Battery Weighs Less Than 450 Pounds. Yes BAT/BS Caveat 4- Close-Fitting Spacers between Cells.. Yes BAT/BS Caveat 5- Batteries Restrained by Side and End Rails Yes BAT/BS Caveat 6 - Battery Racks Have Longitudinal Cross Bracing. Yes BAT/BS Caveat 7- Racks Constructed of Wood Evaluated. N/A BAT/BS Caveat 8 - Batteries Greater Than 10 Years Old Evaluated.
BAT/BS Caveat 9 - Adequate Anchorage Yes BAT/BS Caveat 10 - No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum?
ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. N/A
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: No Sheet 3 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
Description:
PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATI ERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C&D Power Systems LC-25 Cells INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects?
S IC LLY D U
~CON I~EN Date: 10/18/93 SRT: Tom Huang (AEP), Steve Anagnostis (S&A), Paul Krugh (AEP), Randy Steele (AEP)
References:
- 1. Cook Dwgs 12-3476-18, 12-3073A-3, 12-3073D
- 2. C&D Power Systems Inc Dwgs K-5629-3, M-8654-C, M-8655-C, M-8665-D
- 3. Anchorage Package Four substantial welded steel 2-step battery racks well braced in both directions. Two racks house 28 cells each, and two racks house 30 cells each. Each cell is a C&D Power Systems LC-25. The cells are well secured. Each rack is anchored with twelve (12) 3/8" anchors.- see references for details.
Frequency > 8 Hz by inspection.
BS Caveat 2: Batteries are C&D lead calcium flat plate (per label on battery).
BS Caveat 3: Each cell weighs 325 Ibs (Reference 2)
BS Caveat 8: Batteries were installed in 1985. SQUG Action Item 002 was written to address the aging issue.
ANCH Caveat 1: The anchorage package specifies the anchors as unknown 3/8" non-shell type expansion anchors. The original plant drawings (Ref 1) specify 3/8" J-bolts (90 degrees, 9", embedment), but when the current battery rack was replaced in 1985, a note was added to the plant drawing that, where necessary due to bolt hole misalignment in the rack, the original J bolts were to be cut off and replaced with 3/8" Kwik bolts. The current bolts are exactly where the original plant drawings locate the J bolts, and they look like J-bolts (cut-off threaded end).
ANCH Caveat 2: Per Ref 2, the 28 cell racks weigh 10231 Ibs and the 30 cell racks weigh 10920 lbs. The cells are about 90% of the weight and the rack is about 10% of the weight. The attached "Battery Rack Weight Distribution" shows the geometry.
ANCH Caveat 4, 6: Installation checked per Ref 3.
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: No Sheet 4 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
==
Description:==
PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells ANCH Caveat 5: In the SRT's judgement, the anchors are the original J bolts. Per GIP Table C.4-1, these have nominal capacities of 3.74k pullout and and 1.87 kip shear. The pullout capacity is reduced by 0.51 to 1.91 kips due to the 9" embedment length. No other reductions are required.
Note that if the anchors were 3/8" Kwik bolts (the replacements specified in Ref 1), the nominal capacities would be 1 46 k pullout and 1.42 kip shear. The pullout capacity would be reduced by 0.88 to 1.28 kips due to 3.5 ksi concrete. No other reductions would be required."
ANCH Caveat 8: The racks are anchored through a pair of 3/4" thick plates that run along the front and back of the racks (see references and photos). This configuration may produce some prying on the anchors; although the plate may be stiff enough relative to the anchors to keep this to a minimum. Per the discussion for ANCH Caveat 11, the pullout load would have to increase by a factor of 6.2 for J-bolts (3.6 for Kwik,bolts) to reach the allowable limits.
ANCH Caveat 11: The attached "Battery Rack Weight Distribution" shows that the front-to-back overturning moment for one rack is 55648 in-lbs. That moment is resisted by six anchors with a moment arm of 30", which produces a per bolt pullout load of 55648/6/30 = 309 lbs. The side-to-side seismic loads will not produce any significant pullout loads. The shear load is 4586 Ibs for one horizontal direction of input. SRSS'ing the two horizontal directions and dividing by the number of bolts produces a per bolt shear load of 1.41 x 4586/12 = 539 lbs.
Using the bi-linear shear-tension interaction in GIP Figure C.3-2, the interaction for a J bolt anchor is 309/1910 =
0.16 (Note that the shear is less than 0.3 of the shear allowable). If a 3/8" Kwik bolt were assumed, the interaction would be 0.7 x (309/1280) + (539/1420) = 0.55.
Photos: W2T1.11, 12 Evaluated by: Date: /c'o ~S
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
Battery Rack Weight Distribution
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: No Sheet 5 of 6 ID: 2-BATT-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
==
Description:==
PLANT BALIERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: A8 BATTERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells JPPGTUR s 0.12
L 0
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: No Sheet 6 of 6 ID: 2-BATI-AB( Rev. 0 ) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
==
Description:==
PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: C8D Power Systems LC-25 Cells ac W s ib P 11 CC of upper tie W x Sah = 2295 Ib W x (1 0.4 Sov) ~ 4958 Ib CG of lower tier W = 1/2 rack weight = 5460 Ibs Soh = 1.5 x 57. FRS O 8 Hz = 0.42g W x Sah ~ 2293 fb Sav = 2/3 x 1.5 x 5K FIIS I 20 Hz =
0.23g'ateral Load = 2 x 2293 Ib = 4586 Overturning Momen't (sum moments about 8)
~ (2293 x 26) + (2293 x 48) - (4958 x 23)
W x (1 - 0.4 Sov) = 4958 Ib = 55648 in fbs Base Channet Bolt lines
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected 2/14/92 Outlier Seismic Verification Sheet (OSVS) Sheet 1 of 4 ID: 2-BATT-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 15. Batteries on Racks
==
Description:==
PLANT BATTERY AB Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: AB BATTERY EQUIP AREA - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 3 FEET NORTH OF THE ENTRANCE DOOR
.OU L I SU DE I I ION- ec calan Eeet ical E u'
- a. Identify all the screening guidelines which are not met. (Check more than one if several guidelines could not be satisfied.)
Capacity vs. Demand Caveats Anchorage Seismic Interaction Other
- b. Describe all the reasons for the outlier (i.e., if all the listed outlier issues were resolved, then the signatories would consider this item of equipment to be verified for seismic adequacy).
The battery rack is an outlier due to BAT/BS Caveat 8 - Batteries Greater Than 10 Years Old.
2 P D DO U E 0 U N ~ono,
- a. Defined proposed method(s) for resolving outlier.
The attached "Position Paper on the Replacement of the Safety Related Batteries at the Donald C.
Cook Nuclear Plant" (R. J. Roman May 10, 1993) states that AEPSC has committed to adopting the replacement criteria stated in ANSI/IEEE Std 450-1987. AEPSC's position is that this commitment resolves the outlier.
- b. Provide information needed to implement proposed method(s) for resolving outlier (e.g., estimate of fundamental frequency).
3 C 4CE C 0 The information on this OSVS is, to the best of our knowledge and belief, correct and accurate, and resolution of the outlier issues listed on the previous page will satisfy the requirements for this item of equipment to be verified for seismic adequacy:
F Approved by: Date:
Attachment:
Position Paper on the Replacement of Saf Related Batteries
~ QI I ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I II ' It
~ I ~ I ~ ~ ' ~, I ~ ~ t ~ I S I V ~ ~ I
~ Ml ~
~ ~ I~ ~ I s I
~ C '>>I ~ s I~ ~ >>>> I ~ ~
I I ~ ~~ I~ ~ II I ~ ~ ~ ~ I>>. ~ ~ II ~ I I I l I I I ~ ~ . ~ I I I II ~ I ~ I~ ~ I I ~ II I II. S ~
I ~ . ~ ~ I 'Jl ~ >>I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ >>' ~ I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
~ I~ I ~ ~ I II I ~ ~
I~ ~ I Ii. ~ ~ I ~
'
~ ~
>>O ~ I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~
~ ~ >>I ~ ~ I >>\ ~
V ~ I I~ ~ ~ I >> ~ I ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
C ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ '
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~
~ I
'
I ~ I>>J ~
1J ~ I ~ I ~ 4 I
l ~ I ~ >>
L.
CHARTER POWER ersAfMS, INC, Plyrrmuth Meeting, Pennsyh an(a DATE: February 1984 TO: Ron Roman American Electric Power Service Corp.
FROM'6Graham Walker CM Charter Power Systems, inc.
SUBJECT:
O.C, Cook Nuclear Plant Tmfn N, 250 Voft Safety Refatad Battery Seismic and Ufe Qualification I
In response to your1B Feb 94 memo, our mes indicate the following;
'I
- 1. The Train N batteries were originally purchased ln May 1979 under, P.O. No. 0887M21-8, as the Train C Auxiliary Feedwater System dattarfea.
- 2. The original Technical Specification, DCCEE-183&CN, Rev. 2, 1 May 1878, requfmd only seismic qualification, 3, The C&Q Seismic QuafNcatfon Report submfttid for these batteries and racks fs No. VL7S10-02, ReV. 2, dated 16 July 1878:. All doCumentatfcn at that time was submitted tha AEPSC offices In New Yofft', City.
I I
- 4. The 3DCU-g has a 20 qualified life at a 77F arinual average operating tomporature. Qualification is by equivalence af conffguratfon, desfgn and ,l materials to previously tested 3DCU-5, 3DCU-7 and OCU-17 models which were 20 years artNcfaffy aged in acconfance with fEEE<36 prfor to seismic testfng. The fEEE-344 seismfc qualNcation testing these caffe experienced envelopes the D.C. Cook fioor responsa spectrum. The reports for these !
qualification tests are located at C&D Headquirters fn Plymouth Meeting, PA,
.and are avaffabfa for review.
I I
lf you have any questions, pfease call me.
I I
Sincerely, Graham Wafkor Manage; Applications Engineering TOTAL P.03
~ 4>>'>> ~ V t volt-u- >>ax Note 7671 vs Co JOopn
~ ~S~S .
From Co.
Pnono N Phono s Fat 0 Date May 10, 1993 nnnpeot Position Paper on the RepIacemeat of the Safety Related Batteriea at the Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant tron P~~
Ro Je Roman/D ~ Re Smith + ~ ~vA~ ~~l
%pie J.A ra l+)
1) s)
<< ~I"i><
+CA
+~r/qg Based on a review of the surveillance raporto, history, and maintenance records/trend charta for the 2AB battery, tho decision hae been made to replace this battery during thc 1994 Unit 2 refueling outage. The results of similar raviaws for the five other safety-related batterieo has led to the decision to not replace any of these batteries during tho upcoming xafueling outages. Tha following discussion addreaaas the dotails of the reviews that, led to this decision.
AEPSC'a plan had boon to replace the oafoty-related batteriea at the Donald C. cook Nuclaax Plant ovary- 10 years even though they are purchased aa 20 year batteriea. a nav lated to ton nt, was developed aaod on prev oua premature a er eo and high temperatures oxperiencod in the battory rooms. p Beforo the decision was made to adopt this plan, a study waa conducted by HVAC showing that it would ba lees expansive to raplaco the battaries avory tan years than to air condition the battery rooms. Baood on this plan alone, tha lAB battaxy should ba replaced in 1995 (since it wao manufactured in 1985), tha 1CD battery in 1995, the 1N battery in 1999, tha 2AB battory in 1994, the 2CD battery in 1996, and the 2N in 1998.
During the EDSFI, the 10 year x'eplacemont pl,an came into qucation during a review of the original battary sizing calculationo. After lengthy discussions between the inspector and Mr. Roman< AEPSC ccaxnittad to adopting the replacement criteria stated in ANSI/IEEE Std 450"1987r IEEE Rocoaaended Practice for Maintenance, Testing, and Replacement of Large Lead Storago Batteries fox'enerating Stations and Substations.
Specifically, IEEE 450 recommends replacing a battery when its capacity, aa determined by the 60 month performance tost, ia bolow 80t of tha manufacturer's rating. Under ideal conditions, a battery would roach A rule of thumb regarding high temperature is that, for ovary 15'F
'L above a 77'F average temperature, a battery' lifo io shortened by 50% ~ The average temperatures in the battery roomo at the DCCNP are leoo than 92'F (77'F + 15'F) however other factors, ao discussed in the body of this report, lead to accelerated aging and/ox aarly roplacament of large lead-acid storage bat'terios.
77 F average temperature, thorough maintenance throughout battery lifo, etc.
intra-System
rv ~ raa>>>>>>u ~ VC Poaition Paper on the R<<pl<<cement of the Safoty @el<<ted Batteries <<t tb+
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant May 10, 1993 Page 2 thi.o point somewhere around 20 years. Under current DccNp conditions, battery could reach this point sooner (due to the high battery room tcmpcraturee mentioned previously). Ao implied in the previous two statements however, factors other than age affect the viability of the battery. Physical characteristics, such as plate condition together with agc, are often determinants for complete battery replacement.
Failure to hold a charge, as shown by cell voltage and specific gravity readi.ngo, io a good indicator for further investigation into the need fox replacement. lt io a combination of those factors, and not simply the age or capacity alone, that haa led to the decision to replace the 2AB battery during the 1994 Unit 2 refueling outage. Neither these factors, nor the age or capacity alone, indicate the need to replace any of tho other safety"related batteries at this time.
Xn support of the decision to not xaplace any of the other safety" related batteries during 1994 r~fucling outagco, the following information i.a provided.
QQCA Voc ~g~ March/April voltage trends of these batteries i.ndicatc that all of thc calls have voltagoa in the normal range of 2.20 - 2.24 volts (on a float charge). For comparison purpooao, thirteen (13) of the 2AB cell voltages ware leos than (or equal to) 2.20 volts.
- 2) A cursory review of the past tcn year's worth of these safety-reLated battery files reveals few occurrences, i.f any, involving cell low voltages, electrolytelspecific gravity concerns, and overall less than dcaircable physical conditions. Ao a contrast, there wexe many instances of these same concerns regarding the 2AB battery.
- 3) The files do not indicate that an issue waa made xagaxding the temperatures of the 1AB< 1CD, 1N, 2CD, & 2N battery xooms. Thc fi.lco do show, however, that, upon procuxement & i.notallation of the 2AB battery, the manufacture'o xapxeaentativc atatod that the battery life would be shortened due to the high ambient temperatures in the battery room. While this is a recognized attribute for all of thc batteries/roomo, it appeared to be morc severe at the time fox tha 2AB battery room.
- 4) Routine preventive and corrective maintenance ie a part of any battery's life. This maintenance should be fairly consistent from ono safety-xelated battery to another, ao they are all large, lead-acid stationary batteriee. For the most part, thi.o maintenance hae been consistent for the majority of the Class 1E batteries. As expected then, these Class 1E battcrico arc experiencing a normal, predictaEXe decrease in their ecrvico li.fc.
The 2AB battery, howavex, hae demanded considerable additional maintenance and engineering time i.n the past couple of years n
Nine (9) cells had voltages leoa than 2.20 vDc and four (4) cells had voltagco equal to 2.20 VDC.
4 The aforcmcntioned study comparing the coot of more fx'cqucnt battory replacement versus ai.r conditioning the battery rooms supporto this otatament.
The atnbiont temperatures axe generally higher i.n the AB battery rooms, when compaxed to the cD and N Txain rooms, due to their physical location in the plant and their ventilation systems.
Position Paper on the Replacement of the Safety Related Batteriea at the Donald C. Cook ?tucloar Plant May 10, 1993 Page 3 resolving issues concerning low voltages, specific gravities. etc.
Ae the additional time spent maintaining this battery is significant, it is believed that this is signaling tho end of this battery's useful life and that it will most probably not stay within the Tech Spec range for individual coll voltages beyond tho upcoming refueling outage.
Toad acid storage batterieo are dynamic electrochemical devices. As ouch, the ability to predict their future performance and/or capacity represents a near formidable Cask. The decision to not replace any of tho other safety-related batterios outside of 2KB dura,ng the upcoming refueling outages was arrived at after careful consideration of all the factors involved- Tho information available simply does not support their replacement at this time. Therefore, it is recommended that those battories continue to be maintained and tasted in accordance with tho IREE standards and the recommendation to replace them corno when tho maintenance/testing data supports it.
Preparod By/Date: os'/o 9 g Concurrence 8y/Date: n~ ~AC~~pS'07'.
Concurranco Statement:
ass m c: 0+Co Joffxoy/4+Rr tdlderoon/Reit+
~ ~ ~ Roman R.I. Ghoborg J.A. Kobyra D.R. Smith/J. Murtha - Bridgman T.A. Kratt - Bridgman AEPSC/NEEP Gafoty Related Battery File (c:ir$ rXbatteryioefmemo.wp)
TOTAL P.G3
0 ~ ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ L ~ ~ 0 0 ~
rmr r
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ I Q ~ ~
~-
e 0 .104
~ - h 0 0 ~
0 ~
0 ~
IIRSIIII RSRKRIRWRSRIISII:-
RSMIIIII55III mmlsIIRIISIIB 55 RIRSIRIIIRIRRIIII y 4 IIHRIIRW~RwmIIER e o o MWWWWMWW J 0 0 H j 0 e r t
MWWMMWWW
~ + ~ 0 0 ~
~ ~ C 'tta 0 r ;EERIER ~ L ~
0 h
- 12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019
".TACHMENT NO. 1 NCHOR INS ECTION DATA SHEET W KV A6 CIAT7Egg ROOD Unz.t Bldg. Location z.-34~ 8 t z.-3z Installatxon dwg. / Rev.
z -serT-Ecpxxpment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Rr T-aQ INDIANA MICHIGAN POKIER SITE OESIGt< COtITIIOLLEO WOfiKIIIG COPY OCT 0 5 3995 I'<
('T~r II I.ER'K T @I Q(~QJ.<l>.1r I l
1 I
3-8/q.
+~I) i'd&(.Typ)<RAN
)
I -3$ <.>)c)
/i 7 C/fhhlhgBL TYP, Eca.M Ni~Q 400k N 9.
Drawn by: Date: 2 3 Verified by: Date: I->6"4>
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by:
~
~ w %n Date: I r -r-'2 Constructs.on Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
( >*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 0].9 ATTACHMENT NQ. 1 NS CT 0 T AS i i/vO Avx (D C'F E P V I P I'I!=U ~
Unct Bldg. Location
/2 "3~ = 'i'- 7 2.->i i l - A'El Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INDIANA MICHIGAtt POVlCR SITC DESIGN CONTROLLCO lVORKING COPY GAY TBRY OCV 05 >99S l 0 Yz. A I 4 ~ 20 /q (spp- Sut'PoRr DI=TAIL)
VJ Q L H f4'1 E ." J:
Q X3 4 4 i ORi <~D AhrGCC FRANC
~<AT TB R' lO ~L pc I e "X ZO'i+" S7g(SPE ZLI! PORl QFTWI I 4.g
'$
2 II 2C-8p
~ I I
cRov t P&e T C.I4AN V I= I- GAS Ecv>o A Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date:
ual./Cert. inspector Reviewed by: T '4~4 Date: t o.-5-'I3 Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision . 3
- 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 P CT 0 T
~ & QA~raRg u ~JUL f'ME.~T. Boo H UnLt cq'ldg.
Location Ig - 3P ZP-y Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch iiii)ll'lA: <iCi'IC "
/ /2, BAR SIIE 0"SiGi'l CO" ~
'ii'OR!.IhC (.Oi' aOi T.aC OCT 05 1995
>'+z Q 1I WI
'h I'
~
4 Drawn by: Date: 2 Verified by: Date:
Qual./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T'i' Construct'>on v~v~~=~.; Date: l g.-z -c.'~
Anchor Reve.ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision .3
r h
( >*12 CHP 5021. CCP. 019 ATTACHMENT NO.
N ECT 0 T A, 5 .BA>~E.RY Tkvo .- ux got EC V'~
Location
> %COO;-q Unzt Bldg.
Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch II DIP . ~ Q. BOP EVERY 2.Wu OR ERD CATTP R'f FOR C-I MG- INDIANA MICHIGAN PO'V(f R UNl STRv 7 UMISTRVTS T'IG-HT SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED (hR>C.gI-= T A~INS, WTTI=RY r WORKING COPY wa+,-2o58 OCT 0 5 1995 II Yz Tt+K. E'c.
OF RiGID Ih/SV LOFTI ON SOAR lo QR~~W GATTBRI & 5 QP,~<Pg'I'VAPOR i DP.l Al L Drawn by: ,Date:
Verified by: Date:
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: I '~F'I'5'h~-~(bQn Date:
Construct>on Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision . 3
- 12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019
( ATTACHMENT No.
CHOR XNS CT 0 Equipment No.: Dwg No..: j Q -QQp- p Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:
HYS ICAL CHARACT RIST C Weld ID Wi W3 w4 d We e Codes T e Size Q/~@
CC I/ cr 1 = Fillet Ct 2 = Plug/Slot Len th 3 =.Groove Cracks es Yes s es Yes Yes es Yes N 0 No No No Lack of Yes Y s Yes Yes Yes 'Yes Yes Yes Penetration No No No 0 Porosity es es es es Yes Yes Yes Y o 0 No No No No INDIANA 41ICHIGAII POPOVER SITE OESIGII CONTROLLED WORKING COPY 0CT 05 19,I5 I.EP'K base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No T'quipment Date: -24 ons ruc ron re Reviewed by: Date: (o-5'- f3 ons ruc z.o c or evxew ngzneer Verified by: Date:
ua . e . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 3
I ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
t'R
~ ~ )0 $
~ ~ ~ ~
s ~
I I RRRSRRRRRSRWRSI5--.
MIIIIIR8imi mmmSRIMIIMII IKRIIRRIIIIIII e ~
milliAIR RSRIIIHRR ERRI
%%LRRHLL
/S ~
0 0 ~ ~
~
~ ~ t ~ te a ~
0 0 0 r
~ a ~
E E o ~
~ - l
- ~ tl ~-
~ l'4 Q )
s 4 ~~RK~~~~RR RRRRRSRSRSRSRSRR~
-,-
.
MRRRSMR58%55W
~
~
RSMRIRSIH555$ 55 RHRRSSRRRRRRRSRR f
0 o ~
~ RSESRRRHMRRWW RSRRRRRSRRRSRRS
~RWRHHEQHKRH5%6%
IHMWRRRSRHRIRH r e r
MMWMMMWW a e r IBK~EP~:aneesmw a ~a ka ~
-.. EL.
r a
g ~ r
~ W~
g J'He~~ e 0 8K e Ak
'
s I ~
~ y ~ I ~
~ ~ ~ 4 lj ~ ~ e ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
e ~
~ - ~
~ .
~ %4
~ - 0 ~ ~ .
e
~'
e ~
RRRRRRRRRRRRRImi:;:
~ ~
mmmmilmMIII RRRSElKRMIII
~
e ~
~
IHIRRIIIMlmlm IIISmimimlRI y y r e
~IIIIIREQR!SRwRSII MWWMWMWW r e 1 e r y i t MW&MMMW& r p P Ca e
~C a P
~MWaMNaLMC)RP%%9&UIKQWJC HNk&&%4%
'YSMe!E
'h ~
~ a
~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 4 ~
~ ~ I~
f ~
~
~ ~ Q 0 ~
- ~ ~ ~
o 1~4 5 - 8 o ~
RRNNRNR%5%5%555%- -.
IKmmmmmmmm
-
RES 1 mmlESRNmmmmm RSMEWRSmMMIR mmmKlmm y e o r e r o
~mmmmhhRRWHRmmmm mmmmmmm55m r MWWMMM&W j ~
a
~ y 0
~
C.' ~ ~
~0 4
HFJBESISSI%leaSKHKaeRKSSP
~ i. K~%K8'
~ ~ ~ ~
~
I ~
~ ~ ~ s ~
~ ~,. ~ ~
~ ~
I ~ ~
~ - ~
~ .
s is)
IIIMIIIII
~ - C ~
t s ~ KRERHHRWHMSRRSIIIII .
RRRSNIRSRRR%mm5I=-
~ ~
55IIISRIEIIII IIIIRRRRSRI5%
s ~
MIEIIRSRSRSIIIS 0 ~ ~
~IIIIRWRESHESIIII IIEIIIIIIIIIIRHIRl 0 I' MWWMMMW&
0 4 4~ ~
y 8 R M a%4%%~<'
~
a..
s a i o a
~
a la a E
~
sssIsss.ssvissw
~ ~
~'%81sssssssssi%1E
. ssaake~
rr ~ sssIMII 25a4KM<ÃtRQRUPk%0 r
's~s O ~l~e APL ~ ~
~ 1
i S 8 A DEPART)so=AT 12 SHP 5050 NDL- 008 CONTROl.LED DOCUMENT ATTACPNENT HO.
COPY NO.
UITRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit ~Q Test Unit/ S/N ( i<.TS c c-9 Component -A Freq./Diameter 5 m4z Item -~ rS Reference Standard Material ~ S Couplant/Batch No.
Other TEST DATA REMARKS AM r
- u. s'/z k.
L PERFORMED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
FORM NO.
'" M ~.
C 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Pc&
I EVE E,:.~~
I EVEI'age 1 of DATE: C /.- 5 y3 Revision 0
oly16192 PG. N0.425 SAFE'HUTDOWN EOUIPNEHT LIST (SSELUP)
FUNCT IOH: 01ESEL GENERAT IOM Equipment Class: 17 Train: 1 Equipment ID: I-DHE-150-AB DraMing Number: 1.12001 1-5151A 1-51510 System: DIESEL GEHERATOR COM1'ROL AHD IHSTRlNENTATION Equip
Description:
AB EKERG DIESEL GEHERATOR Bui l ding: AUXILIARY Roan: AB EHERG DIESEL GEHERAI'OE ROOM Elevation:'87 Normal state: Desired state: Pouer Required: Sort: lI,R Si~rting System Orauing Number:
Recnsired Interconnections and Supporting Conponentsl ty Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Dpt: KIM E.
ADDITIOMAL INFORHATIOH alias Number: Prier I'rain: B Conponent Served: AB EKERG DIESEL GEHERATOR Nanufacturerl GENERAL ELECIRIC CO Model:
'Pnneil 1-OGAB 1-OGABX Elcm Orauing: 1-98032 1-98051 1-98052 Uiring Drawing: 1-95301 Paver Source: 1-T11A11 1-T1164 1-TOAD-2 un I Ldoun: F Relay Only: Y Component 'Type: ENG. GEN 3500XU,4KV ISO Drauingsl Detailed Location: IN tHE CENTER OF THE ROON
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of4 ID: 1-OME-150-AB ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 687.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) Yes
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 20.00) Yes
- 4. Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00 " Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 0.800 G
LOG 0.090 0.50 LOG Hz 33.00 Capacity ..... Demand Record Ca aci C:IGIPtGIPLspectra.des Label Boundin Spectrum Demand 1 C:tGIPLPROJ0031 tspectra.des BUILDINGGround EI.EVATION 608 BROADEN N Demand 2 C:LGIPIPROJ0031tspoctra.des BUILDING Ground ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand' CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class
'G/BS Yes EG/BS Caveat 2- Driver and Driven Component on Rigid Skid. Yes EG/BS Caveat 3- Base Vibration Isolation System Checked. N/A EG/BS Caveat 4 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibility of Attached Lines. Yes EG/BS Caveat 5 - Adequate Anchorage Yes EG/BS Caveat 6 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated. N/A EG/BS Caveat 7 - No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum'
DC Cook Unit 1 Glp Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet2of4 ID: 1-OME-.150-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate. Yes
- 10. The adequacy of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met'P INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact b nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects' C L D
~Clggg~g SRT: George Gary Thomas (S&A) and Tom Huang (AEP) on 10/16/93.
Diesel Generator and driver not on same skid, however large contrete foundations originate from common floor, differential motion not a concern.
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 4 ID: 1-OME-150-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO No interations. See AEP anchorage data for seismic qualification. Engine anchored by fourteen 2" or larger anchors. Generatoranchoredbyeight1" anchors. Generatorshaftendanchoredbyfour1.75" anchors. the ANCHOR analysis gives a large safety margin (36) as shown by that done for 2-OME-150-CD.
Concern noted with regard to support of air manafold that supports aftercooler. Aftercooler supported by spring mounted column. This concern was tracked and reconciled with items 1-HE47-ABS 8 ABN.
Zap shot Wk. 2, Team 2, Disk 2, Picture 20 8 21.
Evaluated by: Date:
i(-~
Attachment:
Pictures
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 4 ID: 1-OME-1 50-AB ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, IN THE CENTER OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GENERAL ELECTRIC CO AB Emerg Diesel Generator, 1-OME-150-AB AB Emerg Diesel Generator 1-AB-150-AB AB Emerg. Diesel Generator, 1-OME-150-AB AB Emerg. Diesel Generator 1-OME-150-AB
~ >12 CHP 5021 CCD 019
~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CT
~T'PcF DI~BL EV &INE GeS~ROT OR ROOnA Unzt Bldg. Location IZ.-3458- 3 r.' &ME. /50-3 6 Instailat on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
/r l~z
~ ~
g 0,g
~
INDIANA MICHIG P EII SITE DESIGN NT L D WORKING C Y SEP 2 7 $ 995 LERK / ~
gap dv ~Ion Vlpw Lmwivs BAs~
D rawn by: Date:
(
Verified by: Date: ~-8 'Y- ~.8 Q a C rt. Xnspector Reviewed by: Date:
Construction chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 3
- 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACiQ&NT NO ~ 1 Eh/Q OP C(E.SE.I-G;euERATaR Roof.
PME'n t Bldg- Locatzon l2.-3468 - l3 y. awe, -l4o-AE Installat on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
/3y COg 9$
r't
+Cp Oo Oo Sf'I'/~g" tl 9 s "q F PENT I 5q Q
~O Ol qual G H Qo o MACHlh/E BASF ft Qo Qo msanom~ H.
5fv' GRou T Paw INOIANA MICHIGAN POIVCII SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY SEP 27 1995 QMCHa R- MUV '" KT I,J.Z.L A..-< sr<"
Ra.~SSaa lZ Loll,-A45%ÃS-kE- ABC+
- 2. +4"g x "DE, (gEe r//To EueZODEO mfa.
)5><
C'BORE, TyP. (g) PL@ 5, Drawn by: Date:
Verified by. Vvu Date: r -2~ - F~
q . ert. Inspector
('2 Reviewed by: Cn'age Construe on chor Review Engineer 1 of 3 Revision .3
- 12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHKENT NO. 1 I Equipment No.-
Anchor type: re ~c r DWg NOe Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" Q
'orque Torque Mrench No.: Cal. Due Date:
Tightness verified? 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc 1on Date:
Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes N No ons ruc 1on ARE Bolt ZD D W W & O'omments Caps "I/I/ CCATS I El 6 AIU'T <Ec SEE roc're "
Anchor len th protruding 3~" 37>" rk len th Embedment eh'K1 b LE Bolt; ACC ri gq q gg C9,~'II Q~Rt' Concrete og Xu rr4 condition 6800 T &%DAN> EE~ T
~ <i~" 3" v" Edge distance Anchor +y~ y.
an Anchor larit Thread Fees O 0 Q
76cE556p ccs58 cc d8 Q
cfcEIch O
emcee engagement ~, 'I I~
-
y ~z Comments:
c Verified by: tA
~
Date:
., Cert:. Inspector I
Reviewed by: Date:
Construct1on I MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY SEP 2 7 1995 Paga 2 of
( tat I ~+'AA~vl Revision 3
SHP 5050 NDE.008 S 8 A DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO. 3 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: / d" 3 REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit Test Unit/ S/N Component -OWN- /& Freq./Diameter Item AC+o S Reference Standard Material .S. Couplant/Batch No.
Other TEST DATA REMARKS Vs" Vs" PERFORMED BY: I.EVEI: M DATE: / P REVIEWED BY: I EVE I: ~ DATE:
FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip Id: 2-OME-150-CD Train: 2 Equip Class: 17 D~<wing No ~ : 2-12002,,2-5151C, 2-5151D tion: DIESEL GENERATION System: DXESEL GENERATION, CONTROL & INSTRUMENTATXON Equip Desc: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILXARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 'ort: S,R Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: 'ower Req'd:
Support System Drawing: 2-98033, 2-98051, 2-98052, 2-12002 Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: CD EMERGENCY DXESEL GENERATOR MFR: GENERAL ELECTRXC CO.
2 SAs 2 DGCD 2 DGCDX Elem. Drawing: 2-98033, 2-98051, 2-98052 Hiring Drawing: 2-95302 7 Power Source: 2-T21C3, 2-T21D8, 2-TDCD-2 Halkdown: F Relay Eval: Y Comp Type: ENG. GEN-3500KW, 4KV Iso Drawing:
Location: XN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OP THE MAXN ENTRANCE DOOR
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 587.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) Yes
- 3. Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = ) SRT Capacity based on: 1.00 Bounding Spectrum Demand based on: 1.00
- Design Basis Ground Response Spectrum 0.800 r~
/r LOG /
/
/
/
/r 0.090 0.50 LOG Hz 33.00 Capacity ..... Demand File Record 'apacit C:LGIPtGIPLs ectra.des Label Boundin Spectrum Demand 1 C:tGIPIPROJ0034ts ectra.des BUILDINGGround ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Demand 2 C:tGIPtPROJ0034tspectra.des BUILDINGGround ELEVATION 608 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand?
0 0
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL .
GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM EG/BS Caveat 1 - Earthquake Experience Equipment Class Yes EG/BS Caveat 2 - Driver and Driven Component on Rigid Skid Yes EG/BS Caveat 3 - Base Vibration Isolation System Checked N/A EG/BS Caveat 4 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibili of Attached Lines Yes EG/BS Caveat 5 - Adequate Anchorage. Yes EG/BS Caveat 6 - Potential Chatter of Essential Relays Evaluated. NIA EG/BS Caveat 7- No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum' ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. The type of anchorage is covered by the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes arid washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, freewdge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4 Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.'.
The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate Yes
- 10. The adequa of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures. Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or NIA structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibility Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found.
Is equipment free of interaction effects?
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model Etc.:
~
S U SESMC LL D
~cbmgp~
SRTs are TR Satyan-Sharma, W. Djordjevic, J. Nieto, and R. Steele. -. 10/5/93 REF: 1. Anchorage Inspection Data Sheet, Anchorage Arrangement Sketches of generator anchorage, 9/8/93.
- 2. Report on Seismic Analysis of Equipment Supplied by Worthington Compressors Inc. for the D. C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Report EG-37017, 9/20/74- Engine on Foundation calculation.
3.. Dwgs 12-3241-12, 12-3468-13.
- 4. Anchor Bolt Schedule, Dwg 12-3073A-3.
- 5. General Arrangement Dwg W501812AT.
Anchorage:
See Reference 0 2 for seismic qualification of Engine. Engine is anchored by 14 - 2" anchors.
Generator anchored by 8-1" CIP anchors. An edge distance reduction factor is taken for the 4 inside anchors (they are located approx. 3.7" from the pit's edge). Generator shaft end anchored by 4-1.75" CIP anchors ( modeled as 1.375" anchors ANCHOR because this is the largest size anchor covered in the GIP). See ANCHOR analysis.
Photo: DG21-34&35, 36 and 37 (-34 of bolt, -35 from SW corner, -36 from NW corner, and -37 from NE corner).
Evaluated by: Date:
9
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Rov//Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
PJCT~UQS Figure 2: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.35)
Figure 3: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.36)
Figure 4: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.37)
Figure1: 2-OME-150-CD (Photo DG21.34)
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
ANCHOR Report
~Ea t~e Response Spectrum: SSE Frequency: GIP - Rigid Percent Damping: GIP - 5.00 Spectral Values:
Direction. Acceleration (g's)
North - South 0.38 East - West 0.38 Vertical 0.25 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS Wejg+g of Weights:
'umber 1
No Weight 1 10000.00 50.500 85.400 51.250 alee Number of External Forces: 0 Number of External Moments: 0
~li wattg~
hach@.'umber of Anchor types: 2 Tension Shear
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact Other Cast In 1.00 0.30 1.00 Place (A- 26690.00 13350.00 307) 1-3/8 Other Cast In 1.00 0.30 1.00 Place (A- 50400.00 25250.00 307)
Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.
Reduction Factor: 0.85
~WI Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.
~ance Number of Surfaces: 2 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Comp Comp Comp No Nz 0.000 0.000 1.000 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ff. 1
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Anchor Pattern for Surface //2 Legend for Anchor Patterns
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Anchor Bolts Lines
.'oncrete
'.
Concrete Points . mmmm Weld Lines .
geoJHefXK
'umber of Anchors: 12 Anch Surf Id Coord Coord Coord Id 98.700 76.750 0.000 93.200 76.750 0.000 93.200 ~ 129.250 0.000 98.700 129.250 0.000 2.300 129.250 0.000 8.060 129.250 0.000 8.060 76.750 0.000 2.300 76.750 0.000 30.750 10.000 8.500 10 30.750 22.000 8.500 70.250 10.000 8.500 12 70.250 22.000 8.500 ttt of elements per line: 5 Number of Concrete Lines: 4 sta~ stan s~art End End End sf Line X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coord X-Coo rd Y-Coo rd Z-Coord id Width 5.000 39.360 0.000 5.000 131.360 0.000 1 10.000 96.000 39.360 0.000 96.000 131.360 0.000 1 10.000 35.500 0.000 8 500 35 500 32.000 8.500 2 30.000
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 14 ID: 2-OME-150-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
4 65.500 0.000 8.500 65.500 32.000 8.500 2 30.000 Number of Concrete Points: 0
¹ of elements per line: 5 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Dete '
a educti F Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹2 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 3.70 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹3 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 3.70 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
ssential Relays in Cabinet: No
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 14 ID; 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹4 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance-Edge1: 8.75in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹5 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes.
Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹6 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 3.70 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹7 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 3.70 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No dequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 11 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 687.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.'.
Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹8 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (61.38 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=10.00 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹9 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (54.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
( Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 10 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (54.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.76 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 11 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (64.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes
=mbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 12 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹ 12 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (54.50 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):=13.75 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 8.75 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in.
Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc Paii/ Paltr/
No Vail Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 1 20671.79 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13350.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 20671.79 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.77 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 13350.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 20907.90 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13350.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 0.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1 20907.90 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.78 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13350.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 39829.26 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 13395.02 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 2 39829.26 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 'i.oo 1.00 13395.02 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 39829.26 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13395.02 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 2 39829.26 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 13395.02 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.53 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A = Not Applicable Pall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection
0 D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 13 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSI GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection
= Outlier
= Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN = Reduction Factor for Installation Adequacy RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing RE = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance
= Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads SI u Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)
No N-S E-W Vertical Safety Factor 0.375 0.150 0.100 49.387
-0.375 -0.150 -0.100 66 437
-0.375 0.150 0.100 49.196 0.375 -0.150 -0.100 66.700 0.375 -0.150 0.100 36.848
-0.375 0.150 -0.100 79.872 0.375 0.160 -0.100 80.174
-0.375 -0.150 0.100 36.703 0.150 0.375 0.100 84.089 10 -0.150 -0.375 -0.100 84.919 0.150 -0.375 0.100 41.166 12 -0.150 0.375 -0.100 124.223 13 -0.160 0.375 0.100 84.082 14 0.150 -0.375 -0.100 85.264 15 0.150 0.375 -0.100 124.223
-0.150 -0.375 0.100 41 142 17 0.150 0.150 0.250 57.447
D.C. COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 14 of 14 ID: 2-OME-1 50-CD ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 17. Engine-Generators
==
Description:==
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE CENTER OF THE ROOM, 10 FEET NORTH OF THE MAIN ENTRANCE DOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
18 -0.150 -0.150 -0.250 2091.746 19 0.150 0.150 -0.250 735.385 20 -0.150 -0.150 0.250 37.892
-0.150 0.150 0.250 57.220 22 0.150 -0.150 -0.250 2091.804 23 0.150 -0.150 0.250 38.041 24 -0.150 0.150 -0.250 735.242 Minimum Safety Factor: 36.703 The Anchorage Capacity is 36.703 times greater than the Demand
REPORT ON SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF EQUIPMENT SUPPLIFD BY WORTffINGTON CohfPRFSSORS INC.
FOR TllE D. C. COOK NUCLEAR PLANT or AMERICAN ELECTRIC POWER SERVICF. CORPORATION REPORT HG-37017, Ldition C September 20, 1974
CC 05A SUMKCT oooo Sheet ofSee.'
RL Comment No. DES CRXPTXOH Engine SepecMications Foundation Bolt Specifications
@@gine Flange Specifications Poundation Bolts Tension - Rocking, Operating, Tightening, Seismic~
Stresses 8c F.S.
Foundation Bolts - Bending lA,3 Foundation Bolts - Shear S Combined Stresses K F.S.
15 P1ange - Bending - Rocking, Torque, Stress &; P. S.
Conclusions
su~acr E~~i<<P~ ~~rzow TYPF ~RG No W-$0/B/Zg a~ ~ ~J2sr .
x a
0 x \
O Q
z
~ p'iv&dpggeV (z ~g. r.s~)
Soar S CZPr) x 0 g =44 Ill/SO (ke 44~m. sK- w~ssa) b) C'. k -4s Swuc w ('r~~ A~w Jaia) c) Ovr~pci c&nv. - /r J>ocul J) po~g~w~<g = gfdP ('y~~ 5>~ca.)
eg pe. = 5z~ Cr~+ >~w Js- t1>sA)
~) louadareu AzT 5rsds( rkE8 CA kA X~srcw)
=
+ wr
odour'~
'(- goaooaHW /7 She<<t of~ Shts.
a/s ~+
WCL. 5 D3 F<vgb/lTioH UogTS Li = 8.)l,g. b,: 'l,8I5'4 L, = 6. O iH. D.- S.~ Pjog.
L~ = 6~.0 iN. ~25 iH ~
c- .
EioNP/ToH Lb
. lo8 s io 'H/Lb+
(~ 4is7 N.)(So o'PSib
.Ol & y. io '"/gb+
(Io 6o> lN )(Polio PSi) 42,0 IN
. 35'Z. X io '"/L/~
('3.sb7& iu )( s y>oo'si) 4,,- 4, +6, tK,- (o /g ]<
I~
golstil<R. Rargr<oH gpouT Poise 7 go.v s (g. /Cr/t I o//
"
7
.06%iiio .'/.by, A////4'o//L As%/pccu~n r .'
oh'/o 7 g/o
'
<. ~ ~ S E>4 <>> ~l< FPu<DATiwAf
+ aucu.
I CAL 8Y
~g No 4'CIL/ZA~
oaovp Sheet M of ~Shte.
F l (I 4) SK 5'u)
- ~ c $ 5 .5 < 8+ - W CdiV'f/~ =
,o
D 7P/0 l.
8g 'Wi> Ssdrss gp~~ PF~ouwmw~+irg: 7( ':/gyp'~<
~>eA iud +u+swrs >/gvw.worww
@/<~ dN>~c 7o P~~c" Pw dwy~w
/ ~ j 4'~size~~~
gi pg,
/oAyzcwy~c
')
4'e Fp) =
WP~)
H Pc/'file 5 jeers J~~ goer =~.- ~~
~~ =
Pve rp kc~rwq i/~ ggjjgY, 0
C5 z
I a
il g J
su~m +86/PE ON +@nba/7/PW ~gp. C- J: i" MRG. No. -E(O 5A Qwet of ~~%4.
x 0
I I
~ <fg 3
bh C4-Z3(4' 7S)
/2 x
0 I
C9 z
I
~<< ~zz JL
~4.io c~os~
.zs 3 y ro '" Z~e
/JY- Z Q~
0 DS.S ZD3'0 io = Z/p, 37 xl0 zo /gaa g .
5 pic'+c Cc h's7 lh'FRzzs uir4 a~~v-y:
A'p I / /
~P goLTS 2l9,37>./0 5.p x ro 5.@gal x /0 Cd~~ s5sw r~"
A-A gZSg /o
~ ) ~
~~ Fk'/r/Pr A fuuPddziu// oaoue CAL BY
~RG No W g OY64 ~ Sheet ~~ of Shte.
/E4. 4 z.~
. Odd&
4ryz~c A +u~a///ruN; O
use Lk r HrrupE -Wc~ /ou//ORnu// ur.rz Ckr XA'c:
Jig~ ~ /~~sruti.
- 8) F<ung gwsAwsw S/uWc'HW +i'm/ .'zEu =
QS7 As, g~s/s azw/rr pu~er x
O
/ =.04dN 'XwC. Pju, g) ~ s/o 4>~uurb
+= 8/parr/rN = . 2~ co g. gag, g gpss z
K 75oi. ru~/ C+aoe S3 0 ~~~zCz.~),= id<-le ~'< .
~crs
- 5) Cl &'rPilA'$ 5jgp(g
/ZcRc err Po giv4rrru 4/puu cb A/ 5/p
'Yw B$ "
/f/P/O D',p
' J' zi
/I,gag (Sl QGES oH SAhl.LEs 7 CR~AS <Cc.7>apJ OF COM HD2 (T u FOUN DA'TI0H 60(1)
++4/A 8' w Fp~A////J/4//'YPF GROUP
~Rg. N<> k-S/0'/A /0 CAL BY e)/w/r~>r /cA~/m tw Aces Pic'o //y//jew///t':
us~~< 4 /+ed~ 4zwx~~z~~ c~ c = 4 z.
(/Arm gzEuc n//(gc'y /eupcuys ////////<~
Cf~srr~~~r X~/x A.~)
2= Aw,A~~ Pr~ = Z/~
X O
/ - /Ai////a /o+gw - @os des -Fj . PAP'w. XA c) 7~ <8+
z~~ e, A ((zP@)
c8 (y. z.)(Z. xx/)
" X gP~ 00< Q 0
fee CO X
0
0 I
QiVr,rate- giY tl&h/87iVpl '" ~
~
GROUP TYPF RG N~ +- /096 // Sheet of Shte.
CAL SY
~s
/
7 = r ~o/7 r fzAnt Ezj'PcPsr SPE<148 ZnP/E +4 6.<
+- g~yt/iFzM =
9 = //l A~/> ) -iHC~'>~8 (pg) = P/g/fg ~) = /o 776 6
! =
~
/o7766'(, 2)
~/p) 6,Zog.
>
<j F><iN ~rMS =
( rcw&oa Cw gers)
P~~l~r~( SEJM /L =
/8 5 / I /'s/
4'4arw'Cr Sw/os s'z
/od 0, 3 Esp
+ pdwl~lc" Sea'sue 5 9$ r 3 f'sl 3z 6/,9 aa
- 5) scrag PF 5$ FE/Y,
/8'gvos/Ed
+E y/B'av AFF+~<+y- ~+J<it'Ides
~uAP~rnw Mrs, h PA&i<rivx~c. +aserrv~swiA g/lg gg Jgr PP gjP gcs8d.cQ P(rrre~r ~/aa~iWe,<'gzyp~+r (S~ss. fr~ri~s:
+$ gp~ + oPA84Xi4~
sUMKT TYPE CAL BY
......~RG. No. ~ ~
oaove Sheet ~ of ~~ Shta.
z 0
Fi~v~ lAloklHirlklopl P4Tc~lAL 5/diiFic~7r~h'f.
z 0
Q z
K 0
E8/cpwE'iY fpuHorg/'roAI
~
GROUP gg N 5 00009k~ Sheet of Shh.
CAL BY hde z
0 W /%dr dF rsrugg- swdN4 -/Sw&'riuw gers los I jg Pip/Pop'<gr$d/J'WIC 5W
~, = 8+/rw 8 =
~6,+/rrr.
z 8, =<LOr+
0 8 4 Q =,oe9'8 =.ot"/(I8IS) =
4' ZZ./+
z I o< P~ >) = 9! oo+ err
~ji+ - ~~p(~ ~~)+- / 256 rrr 0
o
CALCU.
Ew&Ne gw Wiu&4PJ~
TYPF CAL BY
~G. No.
oaom Sheet lo of ~ Shts.
z 0
/J Y Scdstrtutlug (g /rrro Qi 'oiN4 y Sug&8rrn/4 Jlr l OLmcuW4,'
X 0
0 x
'" fur~ ag-.
0 pq cx437
GRoUp r z.C 't Sheet gJ of J.. Shts, Inrccc//ri//r, g~.co:
1
/
/
P Pc/(x M) $ //(w-oL) j p// (x-$)g + C3 X
0 y
/ "/ g / (X ~L)
'3 cL)-
I Q~
E p~(gg e ~~ Pc( Cy
] I
+
X 0
0 X
0 8cZcc<rrc/o/,'
SPA///'G Lo//cm'//r lu Lciroiuyg
I gUgpg ZiVW/A + Pp 845PPA /fdic oooo MG. Ro. ~ Sheet~ of 7$ hh.
Date
/Z4 s~c
- 8) /E.~ i8i~A4f~ gg~r J~i5 CPA~~
g ~~zcrrum~c ~a~wc g7wru ~w +wuzmw WoaWaaWru~ .
P" X~ew ~ r ~~~a = (P~) ~ ( +~~c~ Pu~ Sr7~e+w .
/or gS
/ Pd&E/c'>c'clxwzg ~c'cw)
= ld/ 6' (i vJc'Eo. ~oog- prpr,z3 = zunis-wd@
e~ WwlcleeAr ~
Q 5 +$ /zc c vf
caecU.
cuuiw~ ck X~w8/jail f"Shoo'Pi/M SUEJECT eaoUp CAL BY Sheet ~ of Shit.
~oo~zi > rgro
~//c1ro 1 '>> j/ Saf/
rs/o'vd
/+pe//48'//n// 4/047. F~B/A ~z Nc Ac uAc
/pe /o ///F ////oF/ower. Pnwr:i +6"/s//~@
g~r/~ +cP/ //82'0/?/PcvYE/Pc 7sis /8'o/- /so /ipAe //f P/r/// .
/u Xrt~ /auwda/~w Aces go~ Wo 5M> M/e 4nwds'.
~ ~
>~E~ EIIIrIIIIC.P'OWIII47IoII oaout RG. No.
f'- 5-~Do o&PJW Sheet ~
/ / of ~l~ Shto.
III Moof OF FAllVFE SHcno- ill FouuoArloH Boa rS bul:
To Sogt>o/7'Ai s6IRWIC- I.oh,JIHAD, F=(FI ~> t.urh CW'h~ tg(ZS'O) =
FRom P PF'g,
" I OO 'fl L I c T to H W8'/citaly FgloT ) ~pl ~ 'Io 9ol'L).LE 'tI l 9 7Pd QEscu E:tnt i'd r orred/7i'c h' +YE
~A IH 6 88$ E rj cf uM Po SHCJ+ For2i 85 Tc F4+WSW j7TE8 EO 7M Fpc aOarroN got.rS.
LINEA 3E f oubNA <ro N goer w iriHl. revctoo ) jt'. F tom l I9u Wogttt < )Le- -o Rove CTtH II.'3IR 6 I )gQ GEE.T'CS l ToQ.QVG = l %CO -~s<0 Fr- imp Ftt+M bCt the OC +AC NNC CH15 4 i) l r'Iti'C, (
5QP C.=,~ b .-
(r>-cc)(.tug cb 7p Ooo L6~
hQ VIlIl&k.C Mttad; ~Q. A~
"- LSg tel SHAR< p< = 2, 6 ie 7- =-= t<9IY.i
~f>9 III IN
.',G 4$ 40~%%. 5ccito 4 n 3.16 pig Ag ~
rt.(
5pg~g g:, ),Q 76 ( ll iver/~ r . 9V75 "t
- g. 76 /H cg F.~., (ualaa')
4
..
icalo lirl.9 I
~ g p 5 r
-. (6)(lo(o~o) ivv<<l l b~F~. (~.~ay)-
]999>
v1'3
EWp/A/E t/+ ~~~~gQ Sly~ <
aaovv ....
CAL SY 6 No
- 0 Yd<W Sheet ~ of MZ,Shts.
o
/ ~d~ ~F Hh~uP< ocul% '/ ~N E H~~4'J>4 fane i6'. 4: 7 =.pion~~~ /
FZow ~sP~us~ fjwcXm& Cw>wg . Fire = gd.7 grf4A'ri l~HgZ 8A rifpl/i4 x sic 5')
M~ 8~x 4cdg, O
I Ck. w)
(P~~~ w) 0 c>) f'~~ IZocA/A di, (p ~)
F~
X O p/ (pic,~iz~~+g
= rs<
X w= wg) =(q,>~a):~~) = see.~V ~>;>>
/J/< (lib> /)6 l9 ) pg~~ L/If a
L CALCU.
&CIIIO @~yAIDHTi~II "
c-.j. ~
~
GROUP iYPE ~RG. No.> ~~~ "~< ~ Shoot of Shta.
CAL SY C 4r~/>Cu44 r)//oc44$ ///op/ P~A/Pp//r//c 6/fislc i) ~upas gC~qL/W
///~ ju/a/8'/- QcM +i+//'rc-///II@ Zu~~5'Ad
/+~ILo+Flg/~E +8 g+4P c4'4~~>/II'I/ 'C8 0'/IWCy X
0 JFx2c sr Pew/'//Ir//II<~o+
rI FaW >C///4c FCr~r~rS lp r-put-g.
(gl/IS IJ PVEPII'dII'SFNVllIILI'P DOC ~
r//E rp/~ocrIn/'E coI/I/IIJ
- 4) 'gdcrs g~ I /I/'I/g$ E:(ddiuoI4$ )
O ~ a ef~<rrwq Z, 3+
Z/
j
.7a ZIO ~ 4DZ P e) 5plcrf /8cpo/2, yy = 7<, uc //. 'L
/0 WPI, J'>OC C ~/
~3o Z4 7Z
'
SUBJ~ ENGINE ON FOUNDATION- GROUP I
TYPF G. No. Sheet ~> of ~> She.
CAL BY CONCLUSIONS<
P >4 )
POUNDATXON BOLT F S
~
2 4' j F THXS SAFETY FACTOR IS DUE TO THE PREIOAD ON THE FOUNDATION BOLT AND OCCURS ON THE LOWER PART OF THE 3-PIECE BOLT, FRXCTXON BETWEEN THE ENGINE AND FOUNDATION ALIDW NO SHEAR OR BENDING IN THE z BOLTSE SO THE PRETENSIONS BEING CONSIDERABLY 0
GREATER THAN TZNSIXZ IOADS CAUSED BX ENGINE ROCKING, IS THE GOVERNING FACTOR.
0 XI ENGINE MOUNTING FLANOES: R.S. - <<.23 (P.Z6) v FREQUENCIES:
((')
k A) ENGZNE ROCKZNG: F 3 9:('PS THXB IS VERY CONSERVATIVE BECAUSE XT IS cr'p BASED ON FOUNDATXON BOLT EIDNGATION AND THE PKDENSION SHOULD ALMW NONE ~
B) VERTLCAL -' . ~ 44 CPS v3
Coo Componene Po. 2-086- ISO-~ Claia ~l pazpicular area Any Yes ~ No che Seismic Roviev Team should pay (If yea, check icema that apply. )
extra actontion cot Anchor Anchor Anchor Type Diameter Spacing ~ /
Anchor Number Anchor Embedment /wG~A Anchor Edge Distance~
Anchor Gap
'Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly)
IE chere ia concern. for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable itom and explain.
- l. Hardvare maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Drawing UpWt ~ Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Dosign Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:
k) ORB Actions Taken:
Proparad By T. Dato 1-~-'V ~
~ K A
~ ~
r s s ~ ~ ~ ~
y P
~ 0 ~ I
~ ~ ~
o ~
~r N
I
'P e
MPWi. '
I I
~ o s s
~
L PV
~ 0
/~ y~ //
/
~
~ i r
0
~ ~ 4
~ ~
~ a ~ ~ ~ I P
~ ~ ~ ~ P ~
~ 8
~ ~ ~
~ e ~ o ~
P e y I ~a
. I O~ O~ O~ 0>>
~
I ~
P I ' I
~ '
o I I g
~ P
~I iifr./ / r
~ ~
~ ~
<<1Z CHP >Ox l. CCD. O1 g ATTACHMZHT No.
Equipment No.: ~g No.: /2-Z4C8 l3 Anchor type: UD A CHEART PF~~ Dia: Dwg No.: /Z-30T5A, g Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: QA Cal. Due Date:
Tightness verified? 0 Yes 8, No Date:
ons r c zo Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8- No 7 Date:
ons uc ARE P YSICAL CHARACT RUSTIC Bolt ZD H'omments Gaps /Arpa7 eRMJ -. - bV CE.SS B pv A c oPQ
-Cu'AGL Anchor len th 5 S -5" S-4 s-(" ~ ~ + Pc. R. 'Dw&.
~ -"/z-Zo~:A, 13 ll Protruding len th Embedment 5 - I/g
/I 5 -III S-Ig3/l 6 -ling g II g-2. S- /II I ~l I ll I~( 5-l~ S-lg, 3
/Cn Bolt ll I'll Z~ 5" I/
2 /)(
ri Z zg /b /& I(. 2/&
Concrete gk CK condition Edge V '~e" ly/I distance Il p /I S-B~ II Z'~ /3" /3 II gll s
Anchor acin 5 cg~ 5 S ~~ S~
Anchor 0" an larit 0V Thread Ol( old oh OK oK.
engagement Comments: W A C. AC.Q H F:C.OOR C AT'I&6- WA A,. H RS PRF-SP.=& ~,
Verified by: Date:
Qual. /Cert. Xnspector I
Reviewed by: T INDIANA Date: I->- J~
Construction ESIGN CONTROLLCD WORKING COPY SEP 08 1998 I.CRK ~ '~~ age 2 gvi<IoA of 3
~ /
S 8 A 12 SHP 5050 NDE-008 DEt'ARTMEt'GHTROLLED Du CUt4tNT ATTACHMENT NO- 1 COPY NO. ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO ~ : REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO. (Q ) Q IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit Test Unit/ S/N k. S Component - pr E,. 0 -C Freq./Diameter S Item Reference Standard Material C. & Couplant/Batch No.
Other TEST DATA REMARKS c-S-Qvc ~I
'/z PERFORMED BY:
REVIEWED BY: LEVEL: ~ DATE:
(
FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE. 008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 1
Uatabase: K: SSEL2C. DBF Equip Xd: 2-All Train: NA Equip Class: 20 Drawing No.:~ NONE~
nction:~
System: EQUIPMENT CONTROL AND XNDXCATXON STATXONS Equip Desc: AUXXLIARY RELAY PANEL All Building: AUXXLIARY Room: CONTROL ROOM Elev: 633 Sort: S, Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd:
Support System Drawing:
Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train:
Comp Served:
MFR Model:
Elem. Drawing:
Wiring Drawing: 2-92071 Power Source:
Walkdown: F Relay,Eval: N Comp Type: INSTRUMENT/RELAY RACK Xso Drawing:
Location: XN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM
0 T
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes
'Sheet 1 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col:.CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
SEISMIC CAPACITY VS DEMAND Elevation where e ui ment receives seismic in ut 633.00 Elevation of seismic in ut below about 40'rom rade rade = 608.00 Yes E ui menthasfundamental fre uenc above about8Hz est.fre uenc =11.00 Yes Ca acit based on: 1.00'Boundin S eclrum Demand based on: 1.00
- Desi n Basis Ground Res onse S ectrum 0.850 LIN 0.000 1.00 LOG Hz 33.00 Capacity ..... Demand File Record Ca H:tGIPLGIPts ectra.des Label Boundin S trum ac'emand 1 H:$GIPIPROJ0059ts tra.des BUILDING Grounds ectrum ELEVATION BROADEN Demand 2 H:LGIPIPROJ0059ts tra.des BUILDINGGround S ectrum ELEVATION BROADEN Does capacity exceed demand? Yes
D. G. Gook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
CAVEATS - BOUNDING SPECTRUM l&C/BS Caveat 1 - Earth uake Ex erience E ui ment Class Yes l&C/BS Caveat 2- Com uters and Pro rammable Controllers Evaluated Se aratel N/A l&C/BS Caveat 3 - Stri Chart Recorders Evaluated. N/A l8 C/BS Caveat 4 - Structural Ade uate. Yes l&C/BS Caveat 5 - Ad acent Cabinets or Panels Bolted To ether Yes I8,C/BS Caveat 6 - Drawers or E ui ment on Slides Restrained N/A 18C/BS Caveat 7- Doors Secured. Yes l&C/BS Caveat 8 - Sufficient Slack and Flexibilit of Attached Lines. Yes l8 C/BS Caveat 9 - Ade uate Anchora e. Yes l8C/BS Caveat 10 - Potential Chatter of Essential Rela s Evaluated. Yes I&C/BS Caveat 11 - No Other Concerns. Yes Is the intent of all the caveats met for Bounding Spectrum' Yes ANCHORAGE
- 1. The sizes and locations of anchors have been determined Yes
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural freq., Yes dam in center of rotation .
~
- 3. The t e of anchora e is covered b the GIP Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, Yes nuts and washers, ex ansion anchor ti htness, etc.
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: Yes embedment length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition,-and concrete crackin .
- 6. For bolted anchora es, an a s under the base are less than 1/4 N/A
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity Yes reduction for ex ansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. Thestren thofthee ui mentbaseandtheload athtotheCGisade uate. Yes
- 10. The ade uac of embedded steel, rout ads or lar e concrete ads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchora e ca acit exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met? Yes INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft ta etsare free fromim act b nearb e ui mentorstructures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or Yes structures.
- 3. Attached lines have ade uate flexibilit Yes
- 4. Overhead e ui ment or distribution s stems are not likel to colla se. Yes
- 5. No other adverse concerns were found. Yes ls equipment free of interaction effects? Yes
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
IS EQUIPMENT SEISMICALLYADEQUATE? Yes COMMENTS Date: 11/1/93 SRT: Satyan Sharma (AEP), Paul Krugh (AEP), Steve Anagnostis (S&A), Randy Steele (AEP - Relay Engineer)
References:
- 1. Anchorage Package
- 2. AEPSC USI A-46 Project Report No MT2, Rev 0, "Summary Report of Fundamental Frequencies Determined by ln-Situ Transfer Function Modal Testing at Cook Nuclear Plant", Aug 1994.
- 3. Drawing No 12-3388-3 A11 -15 form an 10"-2" long x 8'all x 2'eep control panel. The panel is constructed of welded steel plate, angles, and channels. The panel is welded along the front to embedded steel at 4 points, and along the back at two points. A11 and A13 contain essential relays.
Based on modal test data of similar panels in the control room (Ref 2) the SRT estimates the lower bound
~
fundamental frequency at 11 Hz.
The overhead control room ceiling and raceways have been evaluated as part of the raceway walkdown and judged acceptable - see the control room PASS form for details.
There is a door at the far end of the A6-A15 bank that is commonly left open. The door could, strike the panel, but the SRT judges the impact is far enough away from the essential relays not to be significant.
There is a ladder secured against the wall in front of the panel - it is secured so it will not strike the panel - judged acceptable.
There is a fire extinguisher hung on the end of A6 that wilt bang against the cabinet. The SRT judges that it will not affect the essential relays in A11 and A13.
Anchorage:
- 1. The anchorage package shows details for 1 of the four front edge weldments - the others are similar.
- 3. The SRT conservatively estimates the weight at 300 Ibs/ lineal foot.
The embedded steel is a 5/16" steel plate anchored with a 1/2" x 4" Nelson stud every 12" (4.4 kips per GIP Table C.3-1 including a .65 knockdown for embedment length). The weldment controls. The attached ANCHOR analysis shows a margin of 3.3.
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
ANCHOR Report
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc ANCHOR Report Response Spectrum: Instructure Realistic Frequency: User - 11.00 Percent Damping: User- 5.00 S ectral Values:
Direction Acceleration 's North - South 0.314 East - West 0.314 Vertical 0.183 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS
~eicehts:
Number of Weights: 1 No Wei ht 1 3000.00 60.000 0.000 50.000 Forces:
Number of External Forces: 0 Moments:
Number of External Moments: 0 Allowables:
Anchor:
Number of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 3/8 Hilti Kwik-Bolt 1460.00 1420.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 N
Concrete:
Ultimate Stress: 3500.00 psi.
Reduction Factor: 0.85 Weld:
Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 8 ID:2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Surfaces:
Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Com Com Com No 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹1 gY Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts:
Concrete Vines: ~Ppgy(Peg!P Concrete Points: ~5m+
Weio uncs: ~5~5
~Geomer Anchor:
Number of Anchors: 0 Concrete Lines:
¹ of elements per line: 1
D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 8 ID: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri lion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
Number of Concrete Lines: 0 Concrete Points:
Number of Concrete Points: 6 Y Surf Conc-Pt No Coord Coord Coord Id Area 19.000 2.000 0.000 9.000 47.000 2.000 0.000 9.000 75.000 2.000 0.000 9.000 103.000 2.00Q 0.000 9.000 2.000 22.000 0.000 9.000 118.000 22.000 0.000 9.000 Weld Lines:
¹ of elements per line: 1 Number of Weld Lines: 6 Start Start Staa End St Line No X-Coo rd Y-Coord Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coord Z-Coo rd Id Width 19.000 2.000 0.000 20.500 2.000 0.000 0.125 47.000 2.000 0.000 48.500 2.000 0.000 0.125 75.000 2.000 0.000 76.500 2.000 0.000 0.125 103.000 2.000 0.000 104.500 2.000 0.000 0.125 2.000 22.000 0.000 3.500 22.000 0.000 0.125 118.000 22.000 0.000 119.500 22.000 0.000 0.125 Determination of Reduction Factors:
Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anal sis Results:
Analysis Performed: Yes T eofAnal sis:Re ular S ectral Accelerations G's No N-S E-W Vertical Safet Factor 0.314 0.125 0.073 13.973
-0.314 -0.125 -0.073 8.111
-Q.314 0.125 0.073 13.973 0.314 -0.125 -0.073 8.111 0.314 -0.125 0.073 8.500
-0.314 0.125 -0.073 18.535 7 0.314 0.125 -0.073 18.535
-0.314 -0.125 0.073 '8.500
0 D. C. Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 Screening Evaluation Worksheet (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 8 IO: 2-A11 Rev. 0 Class: 20. Instrumentation and Control Panels and Cabinets Descri tion: AUXILIARYRELAY PANEL A11 Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: CONTROL ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.:
0.125 0.314 0.073 7.505 10 -0.125 -0.314 -0.073 3.290 0.125 -0.314 0.073 3.352 12 -0.125 0.314 -0.073 8.921 13 -0.125 0.314 0.073 7.505 14 0.125 -0.314 -0.073 3.290 15 0.125 0.314 -0.073 8.921 16 -0.125 -0.314 0.073 3.352 17 0.125 0.125 0.183 12.626 18 -0.125 -0.125 -0.183 7.842 19 0.125 0.125 -0.183 37.028 20 -0.125 -0.125 0.183 8.816 21 -0.125 0.125 0.183 12.626 22 0.125 -0.125 -0.183 7.842 23 0.125 -0.125 0.183 8.816 24 -0.125 0.125 -0.183 36.553 Minimum Safety Factor: 3.290 The anchorage can withstand 3.290 times greater seismic demand
I
- 12 CHP 502 1. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CT 0 Mop < H E+SI- coR+FR, O(= l HE'ROOM Unzt Bldg- Location z-maw'- o Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch AVx, Pa.LA,Y PAMC-LS A-II T'HRL( A-IS I'BR DMS I, 2,-Zg'I'F-lo 2-SS'<0-0
? -C4 4<A- I g~ 2."ZZ'46- I lg
/o-? p~
A-IS Q-0 SEC DE,r4.I L I IHOIAHA t(IICHICAH POW-A
'(z, g I '!'a xS 4 SH(n SITE OESIGH COHTAOLLEO WOAKIHG COPV ELev. VIEw LYG-,
SEP 21 1995 EAST'LEAK
+
Drawn by: Date: /
Verified by: Date: ga. g9 Qual ./Cert. inspector Reviewed by: F Date: I- t3 Construction Anch r Review Engineer page 1 of 3 Revision .3
~ fq
- 12 CHP 5021 CCD p19 ATTACHMENT NO.
NS CT 0 T yCR + E4gl COB.IVI=-R V 3F T F.~WH Bldg. Location Installation dwg. / Rev. Ecgxzpment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch E
~A ) ~~ ~i t.A '
( g ~ ~I ~ ~'9v D~CD
~~
"S~~
V
~/tb gltVC ~ 'SK4 <~
1 ~
os~e')
I I
V9
~~
r I 'Lk~ ~~VS ~
~28'Z8 ~IB~Q S> D
~/I (6~ ~ 28 II I lg
~II I I
~ I 28 2B ZB ZB 'Ie ZE:E: DF-1 AIL I CTI "A A'A ..'NOIAtIA MICklGAt( POWER SITE OESIGN Cott TAOLLEO WORKING COP'f SEP 2i >99<
5t
~o (I.
~~A = jhrPCCF S5]BLK LEAK T Drawn by: Date: /y 3 Verified by- Date:
Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date:
Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision
""~4 <Ha'021.CCD oa9 ATTACHMENT NO. a CHOR INS CTIO Equipment No.: .: 2~22 eV Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:
H S ICAL CHARACTERIS C Weld ID WJ WZ W3 W< WS Weld e Codes T e I I I TAcK. I W7'z"
/II' 1 = Fillet Size =
Len th y// g I/
3/'l 2 Plug/Slot 3 Groove Cracks Y 0 No Lack of Ye Penetration No Porosity Yes o o o 0 No WI IS WELD Pb oN 1=OUR S(DE.S, WQ Y8" L/hrQE.R CV1 W3 +8 ClhJC)BQCL/ 7 W 4. /4 LrNDCR Cu T
'/4. UIVO E:P, CU t.
4v Cg /4 UMDL=RCV T'8 I2
/4 UADERII cvT Q HOLW WIt-H WASHSR5 3 RMBE.@DE 0 Ia 8 I
~
C 4l X 3 X~ PING LI:-
0 3 HAGI, a WI SEc.TIo~ e E'aYAIL- I S E.c-~101 C C.
Equipment base flexible: Cl Yes E No ons ruc son re Reviewed by: Date:
ons ruc son c or evzew ngzneer Verified by: ua . er . npsec or Date: 5 +
Irrl)IANA FiIICHIGAN PO'V/FTI SITE OCSIOrr Cotr TIIOLLt.o V/OII~Ir G COI V SEP 2 l 1993 page 3 of Revision
ATTACHMENT3 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR TANKS Ec HEAT EXCHANGERS EVALUATED FOR USI A-46 THAT ARE NOT COVERED BY THE PROCEDURES IN SECTION 7 OF THE GIP RAI ITEM 5
This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for a cross section of class 0 and 21 tanks and heat exchangers that are not covered by the procedures in Section 7 of the GIP. The samples selected are designated with an
- in Table 2 and 3 of this RAI. The following examples are included:
lass 1- T-113-AB1 21 1-HE-13 21 1- 21 1-'I'K-11 21 1-'1 K-37 21 2- -11 21 2- -3 21 2- -134- D
Equip ID: 1-QT-113.-AB1 Train: 1 Equip Class:0
" wing No.: 1-5151A tion: EMERG DXESEL System: DIESEL LUBE OXL Equip Desc: AB EMERG DIESEL PULL PLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB EMERG DXESEL LUBE OXL PXT Elev: 579 Sort: S, Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing:
Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: LUBE OXL STRAXNER 1 MPR: NUGENT 1' 1554-4L3B P l Elem. Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: A Relay Eval
- Comp Type
- STRAINER Xso Drawing:
Location:
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of11 ID;,1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other Descnption: AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554PL3B SEISMIC CAPACITYVS DEMAND
- 1. Elevation where equipment receives seismic input 587.00 Elevation of seismic input below about 40'rom grade (grade = 608.00) N/A Equipment has fundamental frequency above about 8 Hz (est. frequency = 8.00) N/A Capacity based on: Judgment
- 5. Demand based on: 1.00 'ealistic Mean-Centered Floor Response Spectra File Record Ca acit Demand 1 C:LGIPtPROJ0031tspectra.des BUILDING uxilia ELEVATION 587 BROADEN N Demand 2 C:<GIPIPROJ0031'Lspectra.des BUILDING uxilia ELEVATION 5S7 BROADEN N Does capacity exceed demand' ANCHORAGE
- 2. Appropriate equipment characteristics have been determined (mass, CG, natural fretful., Yes damping, center of rotation).
- 3. Thh pe of anchorage is coveredb the GIP. Yes
- 4. The adequacy of the anchorage installation has been evaluated (weld quality and length, nuts Yes and washers, expansion anchor tightness, etc.)
- 5. Factors affecting anchorage capacity or margin of safety have been considered: embedment Yes length, anchor spacing, free-edge distance, concrete strength/condition, and concrete cracking.
- 6. For bolted anchorages, any gaps under the base are less than 1/4. Yes
- 7. Factors affecting essential relays have been considered: gaps under the base, capacity N/A reduction for expansion anchors.
- 8. The base has adequate stiffness and the effect of prying action on anchors has been Yes considered.
- 9. The strength of the equipment base and the load path to the CG is adequate. Yes
- 10. The adequac of embedded steel, grout pads or large concrete pads have been evaluated. Yes
- 11. The anchorage capacity exceeds the demand. Yes Are anchorage requirements met?
DC Cook Unit1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) ~ Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
Description:
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT.
Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554PL3B INTERACTION EFFECTS
- 1. Soft targets are free from impact by nearby equipment or structures Yes
- 2. If the equipment contains sensitive relays, it is free from all impact by nearby equipment or N/A structures.
- 3. Attached lines have adequate flexibili . Yes
- 4. Overhead equipment or distribution systems are not likely to collapse. Yes
- 5. No other adverse conce'ms were found. Yes Is equipment free of interaction effects' SRT: Tom Huang (AEP) and George Gary Thomas (S&A) on 10/6/93 REF: 1. Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certified 6//6/92 for both 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2.
- 2. Dwg 0 10-089
- 3. Worthington Co. Full Flow Oil Lube Strainer Calculation, 8/26/74.
MFG: NUGENT, WM W8Co -1554M-L3B-DN-100 Seismic Capacity vs Demand: The Bounding Spectrum does not apply for Class 0 items. This component is seismically rugged based on SRTIudgement and inspection, and anchor analysis.
Anchorage:
Supported on 4 angle legs. Each leg is anchored by one 1/2" J bolt anchor. The ANCHOR analysis was performed for 1-QT-113-AB1 and 1-QT-113-AB2 together, since they are connected by a relatively rigid piping segment.
Frequency was judged to be greater than 8 Hz.
The total weight is 17305, with the CG located at an approx. mid-height = 33" (Ref. 2).
The minimum embedment of the 1/2" J-bolts for 1-QT-113-AB1 and'1-QT-113-AB2 is 9.125" and was used for the embedment reduction factor for the J-bo! ts.
The SRT also judged the bolts may be subject to prying. therefore a very conservative.5 reduction factor was applied for prying.
ANCHOR analysis includes nozzle loads as specified in Ref. 3, Sheet 15. Conservatively assume that the inlet and outlet nozzle loads are distributed between the two strainers, 1-QT-113-AB1 and AB2, because of the way they are joined (see Ref. 2). Therefore the nozzle loads modeled in the ANCHOR analysis are the absolute values of
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUA'TIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
Description:
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554AL3B the larger of the two loads specified in Ref. 3, Sheet 15. The way the loads are defined in Ref. 3," they correspond to the x,y,z coordinate system as follows: c=x, a=y, and b=z.
The ANCHOR analysis even with the highest nozzle loads and anchorage reduction factors, shows a high margin of safety (2.5).
Zap Shot, Wk1, Tm 2, Disk 1, Picture 45 Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
ANCHOR Report
0 DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EOG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554<L3B P~CI BKR AB Emerg Diesel Full Flow Lube Oll Strainer 1, 1-QT-113-ABI
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B ANCHOR Report gy~gi~g Spectrum: Instructure Realistic
'esponse Frequency: User - 8.00 Percent Damping: User - 5.00 Spectral Values:
Direction Acceleration (g's)
-
North South 0.32 East - West 0.32 Vertical 0.17 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS Nciahtm Number of Weights: 2 No Weight 1730.00 22.875 0.000 33.000 1730.00 -22.875 1.000 33.000 EQKQR Number of External Forces: 2 No Fx Fy Fz 1.23E+002 1.23E+002 7.03E+002 0.000 12.000 24.000 3.31E+002 4.02E+002 6.24E+002 0.000 -12.000 24.000
%@arnis of External Moments: 2
'umber Mx 1 8.64E+003 -1.86E+004 6.86E+003 2 3.98E+003 -8.52E+002 2.54E+003 hlhMrat~
haabuc'umber of Anchor types: 1
DC Cook Unit 1 GlP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EYALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev, 0) Class: 0. Other
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLONl LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554<L3B Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf No. Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 1 1/2 Other J-Bolt (90 6660.00 3330.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 deg)
Qaac&c Stress: 3500.00 psi.
'ltimate Reduction Factor: 0.85
~i Allowable Stress: 30600 psi.
Qi~g~
Number of Surfaces: 1 Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Comp Comp Comp Nx Ny 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹ 1 Legend for Anchor Patterns
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
Description:
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OiL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B Anchor Bolts:
mmmm Concrete Lines: ~mt//+
Concrete Points
.'eld Lines
.'ux; hrzhac.'umber of Anchors: 8 Anch Surf No Id Coord Coord Coord Id
-30.719 -7.260 0.000
-16.531 -7.250 0.000
-30.719 7.250 0.000
-16.531 7.250 0.000 30.719 -7.250 0.000 16.531 -7.250 0.000 30.719 7.250 0.000 16.531 7.250 0.000 0 of elements per line: 4 Number of Concrete Lines: 0 Number of Concrete Points: 8 Surf Conc-Pt No Coord Coord Coord Id Area
-30.719 -7.250 0.000 4.000
-16.531 -7.250 0.000 4.000
-30.719 7.250 0.000 4.000
-16.531 7.250 0.000 4.000 30.719 -7.250 0.000 4.000 16.531 -7.250 0.000 4.000 30.719 7.250 0.000 4.000 16.531 7.260 0.000 4.000
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEvVS) Status: Yes Sheet 8 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554AL3B EcldJ.iaaf '
of elements per line: 4 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 2 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment I.ength: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Three'ded Anchor: 0.00 in.:
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for ..ichor 0 3 Adequately In"tailed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor 0 4 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No
DC Cook Unit1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0) Class: 0. Other
Description:
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 15544L3B Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹5 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹6 Adequately Installed: Yes
'mbedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹7 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹8 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (27.25 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 9.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in.
Edge Distance - Edge 1: 4.38 in.
Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks traverses thru Installation Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINEP. 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG LUBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc Pall/ Pallr/
No ld VaIl Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF RC RR RP RB RM 1 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 4 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 0.50 1.00 3330.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.0Q 1.0Q 1.00 1.QO 6 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.50 1.00 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.QO 1.00 1.00 1.QO 1.00 1.QO 1.QO 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.GO 1.00 0.50 1.00 3330.00 N/A 1.QO "s.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 1 1398.60 N/A 1.00 1.00 0.42 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 0.50 1.'00 1.00 3330.00 NIA 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A = Not Applicable all Allowabi Pull without Reduced Inspection Vail = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vallr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection
= Outlier
= Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage RN = Reduction Factor for In tallation Adequacy RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing RE = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF = Reduction Factor for Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path RM = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads Analysis Performed: Yes ype of Analysis: Regular IA elerations (G's)
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUAlION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet11 of11 ID: 1-QT-113-AB1 ( Rev. 0 ) Class: 0. Other
==
Description:==
AB EMERG DIESEL FULL FLOW LUBE OIL STRAINER 1 Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG I.UBE OIL PIT, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: NUGENT 1554-4L3B No N-S E-W Vertical Safety Factor 1 0.325 0.130 0.067 5.843 2 -0.325 -0.130 -0.067 7.456 3 -0.325 0.130 0.067 5.843 4 0.325 -0.130 -0.067 7.456 5 0.325 -0.130 0.067 5.853 6 -0.325 0.130 -0.067 7.213 7 0.325 0.130 -0.067 7.213 8 -0.325 -0.130 0.067 5.853 9 0.130 0.325 0.067 2.478 10 -0.130 -0.325 -0.067 2.756 11 0.130 -0.325 0.067 2.503 12 -0.130 0.325 -0.067 2.695 13 -0.130 0.325 0.067 2.478 14 0.130 -0.325 -0.067 2.756 15 0.130 0.325 -0.067 2.695 16 -0,130 -0.325 0.067 2.503 17 0.130 0.130 0.167 5.114 18 -0.130 -0.130 -0.167 9 385
.130 0.130 -0.167 8.752 20 -0.130 -0.130 0.167 5.040 21 -0.130 0.130 0.167 5.114 22 0.130 -0.130 -0.167 9.385 23 0.130 -0.130 0.167 5.040
-0.130 0.130 -0.167 8.752 Minimum Safety Factor: 2 I78 The Anchorage Capacity is 2.478 times greater than the Demand
SUBJECT F F nM S AIN R GROUP ak G. No. ~~of Sos.
CAL BY PAGE DESCREPTIOH Fig. 1 2-S Frequency of System Seismic leg forces Nozzle loads z
0 7-9 Leg forces due to nozzle loads 10-11 Leg stresses O 12 Base Plate 13 Flolding down bolt 14 Meld of leg to tank X
Q 15 Local Shell Stresses X 29 Recommendation sketch (SK-7940) 30 Summary I
0
JOB NUMBER / 8 Calculations NUMBER "(0
/'/'ILE
SUBJECT:
WC/ -/Ci iC ~ ( Q..( SHEET / OF SY A Y /'A/ OATE~F APP CATE
JOB NUMBER Z5-r d Calculations FILE NUMBER C-<0
SUBJECT:
SHEET Z OF BY ~~1 DA~
APP DATE l
27'r ps S fif FA'r
/~f 0'
Calculations SU6JECT: SHEET Z OF BY A TH/ DATE~
'PP DATE 2 t/
A'47
+Cj Ol\g+Q 4 <<4<<L / gS<<t~
AC AZg Sds 4
N7 4 g<< CF / /2 ~
t S .S" r Se~p~
/0 > IdZ4 gC Q/ Z/
7 /2 B
'i C
rim 0'5' '/
/r
<</P4 f
.rg = .'
+44 g'(
/z w" Q~Z' c FAC( t' F
~ ~
r
/Sgs Car: ~C gJ
/F
Ã
~
4Q <<
~ ~
0 t~,
I I
JOB NUMBER 26 I TdJ Calculations ~" FILE NUMBER EU@EDT: fjordJIVE re SHEET OF Q/g. ~ 1 ~/AJ/E + BY DA APP DATE
~ WcrvOM F~eA r-rW')P 7u~)( ~o>'-.+ 6v S'.~
r~/ ) l-a'gw E
C<<34>EE MOTIF 5
+
Calculations FILE NUMBER
SUBJECT:
LJog~)ply ~y pl SHEET OF 8 654 Or l. ~A/&k4 BV I ~
DATIVE APP DATE
/UA7 V Fzr uw<c o<
7)rr ZZC7 )od r~rJ)C
~p g ( F. " FEZ 5 F. gg~ px~ ~z) x (I S &4S ZC~)AJ C x ~AFEF Q~)my xxlz 'x,assed+ sZ P Is?+PD4 T 9?e t 24/ 7
~7~ /2d 0 cga Z rr 29/
llrS 2 ll)&I QZ,M Ax/g/
99~6 l z
~l. 6? x WA5%
~l 2 CfpfC./)r-))
87 + 3,{?r, 7,(2. ]
~~< "i/8&
Formals-iA Fizgcy ~ &~g~Ay/~ l P~
't 6xsnc 8esEr p sr +~ srs ~ az F) ~l x?zoP +sos g F~ v azszj'El CC
~K l2)'4 > g4 rg>EE(O 4 I
( FEE@ w EP~~>1 ~~ 5 /224 4 lO Z+O
Cak:ulations. FILE NUMBER C I0
SUBJECT:
SHEET~ OF APP DATE
,~P Calculations FILE NUMBER + l0 SUSJECTI SKEET~ OF eV ALH DATE29 APP DATE C~
x DS X
ZzC 25 7a >
/
p4 gi 2. ¹/
~P Calculations FILE NUMBER
SUBJECT:
SHEET~ OF BY +CW DATE APP DATE
/
3 F/
l I
K O
z X
O
Cele Uiations FILE NUMBER Q~ l
SUBJECT:
SHEET~ OF APP DATE z
0
' ~ E
~
Calculations FILE NUMBER
SUBJECT:
, IJy~rHW C7 oA/ SHEET OF BYE r OA~~/g J-~)f8 A7 G4 SIT PP'EtZW DATE rl/o pr ACr]a+i P PierrlCrlOV ~ Srg<CrxOal D an dr /~ca r
/2.6 mid -W.i Wc 7 g,5 -asA ie /D7.0 A7
-ig,/ -Wee irk
-87) NEO
-I/AZ ]~0 77,'5'82li
-39rd //Qr S
- Hr Z W.j -a,d -4dr3 iS,S -/4P u.i -
Co<By/Al /045
-/ IB- 5 +S'Z
->Br 7
-/&Br'B.7
)- a7Z-l
~~)
O CC O
JOB NUMBER 619,o Calcuiations FILE NUMBER suwscTI QocruFFT'o& SHEET OF BY DATE 5reru A. Zs-~fr OP I-r~C ~ APP DATE
~Eh /
<GO ~ ~ cg CJ g ~PC ( gA ~ ~FFFDOF'F" /0)
Sq'cnxc c -Pg,P y - <<B,G ~~ - iS'S,G' g 482F) +$ 7+
- /99r 7
"/9917'/r>e'er&+ 5+rB >l/i~w~ b -S'~/g
-//,34 - w,47 -/.5 <<48 7&
(sFrd sziFrrr Fo )
- /7,/2 Ws/
/ 'r ~44?M P r' g/'
( V<M~ ld+3 aqua ++
JOB NUMBER Calculations FILE NUMBER su+EcT: 4~grA w'c7ohl SHEET C OF
/age& dr Sos'p &cd'5 BV l ATE APP OA7E .
/a)LÃT /vmr
/jiZ 4,7 -8r 7
-/6il
-St
//5i5 a,2 -Br graf 3 are
JOB NUMBER N/ rO Calculations F I LE NUMBE R sUBJEGT: ~4R7 //IA< re SHEET BY OF DA~TE fuge& g/ 9QsF np Z4' APP DATE
/&mr JWLEP F~ /7 2 -5ZA -Bdr7 8(7 -28$ C3rg '7r,l Fdic /DOr
~5',P.ER
?Br2.
2', Or 0 I
-le
~
4d
-II& ~7 Wc 8'E2 -37 -/B A,9 -e/ z& -as4 . 4r3 muvt7Zo+S
's Q,B -aZ.1 /7Pr 9
-XZ.4 /LS M ~
Xj/r 7-'
(~ .r~ 5 77- 2 r 69,8, +7'T i E
' 0 z
0
JOB NUMBER /,o Calculations FILE NUMBER
'UBJECT:
SHEET K OF BY 'ATE /
PoA?c~ g7 9AM ~ 'c5 APP DATE IHuZ7 C~l IecEp Aur
/3F6 HC'i/ 8F5 HE 7 -m,5 ZSA BS(d -/o70 -4i 7 IWi4 -/6i/ -Wr3 sc}E3 -3g2 -JCO
//5i
-BF g ~ D F7 40F3 -/8S j4P 77iS -zs>
i$ )C
/
~ 5"I
Calculations
~f FILE NUMBER s t 0
SUBJECT:
SHEET~/ OF APP OATS
.u
~
r 3's'K Ce'zs. ~
s SF K +g E
'j, K SSS'4 gg o 6'P+
~
OPIA i~s" Y oh ~
4's /
WF Sl
~ ) 3C~ - ' >C:C-' ~ QgSF P FQ~ I fez
'6/ g l ~
so 4s" 4i x+ v
~-c ~~+
~ ~
X = -4'dv /XX F S'g = - A/SF ~
y I
F QS ~j = ~2k'5
-res
- -rOZZ rr>-"
=- res Krrs < & 9g r24" s ~rr' w4 s-<~
7roO
Pw
JOB NUMBER Calculations FILE NUMBER 6 I 0
SUBJECT:
SHEET~ OF APP OATS r~ S ~ g~~ /5 ~
y~ +(g gr. -g'.g y = - ) s's .y - 4 s = -ag. p'
~
PEP" t r 4'/CP J
~ rti.~ <<>>..
V 7
(/4/ K 6 sC I
'I /O'P s//) //. S 'SFFS
~d5S W rSC rr ~ + AO>P' 4'po w '~y.0 ~ MA" Ping
- 5'C r-Ss c r7pa H fr 4
~
K~ - S'Z .7 rO + ~ S'4's' = 145 3' r'C I
~ <<'~ rg V=,~s> ~
..zn C ~we c.~
ASIA ~p pro
+Qp (
~
jr/ ..
i
~C'~w Aging o
/rr g'/ p /r 0 S r z
= rrv'
~ ES~ E'Fg K ~ Z r~1 FS ne /. r
JOB NUMBFR / O Calculations FILE NUMBER
SUBJECT:
SHEET BY DATE r"
- ~ ~'f <<vj M~~
@
DATE
/~p/Ag (/&W + l~ &) <<A ( IC'rE!+
y C ai 2 2
lo2P r.
Ip g e ~ rEEE rr't/ jr' <<<7l gr'(.
rx<<AE .w)mArD E y,lrcP.'jvr~ ~W E'~
/
(4 o'MW~/ i>p+ /4
h ~
Calculations FILE NUM8ER Q.- (c
SUBJECT:
SHEET OF ev OA~ k APP DATE A. JE (( :Z~r /de o CI'+0
/4 to
+ (~~~-D) J '.DgP
~%
~ 1 &o( ~ ogp
/ C r- y. Z,y C FK P
7c a~&
C
~" M.( r.
~
~
Arf><
2IJJ 7- g. ~ y j~~~rSy g ~~ A r FS /
0 CC 0
z
,~F' F.
Calculations FILE NUMBER SUMECT: SHEET~ OF APP OATS
~Ca AVE g > E5'7 E" y" z ~ y'&Ma I ~ JA. 4'm JP4&~iT'C Igg r s4 Z Ted
~I ~~'j ~ ZPE'ii) s
>K C APtg t gfs
~
ggP ~
~gg S
- ~c J d
~St 8'c tS
0 JOB NUMBER Calculations FILE NUMBER
SUBJECT:
SHEET OF BY r DATE
~ APP 0 ATE rr
~ ~
rr rr,/rr M / r~p~ r r r/r f p /(Z,(e~/ rr /
(A ~
C4F/~ ~ Q7P lj Qow7LR C
>0, lr HLC r afUrr apF- ~47 raw.
T t./ i9 2< 2. /44 ~ lC L
dZ.~T ~~I
~ zcZ5 X .~
o<.
98~,
~ 8" ~ 2
,'~~ Euic Fiow L~ac. Gt~ 'STRAINER GROUP C -I 0 TYP RG. No.
/0-O89 Sheet of CAL BY a/z ~/~~
Local S Hc~~ - Tz.css as '
go~'hem LoAbs ~ (As pEi 6/zA 7+3 sn/~r.i OLl7 LET; VZZS C.Q -/29 Lb~ + +0l lb( ~ /$
F8 + +/0 /6/ - 7o3 Lb~ + O Lby, -Ca+
fc ~ /zZ /bg,- sr~ >g 48<, - ~ L.b~
z j4 t5'L>(A) w-Q I- IA7cl) w-/bg k p>oft) ~ -lQ ~
- lf]2) /n'-LLg 0 A + s~zbz) w zb<,-z-i;z&4i~-+ 2/2 ((Z) lpl-lip 2 C(E) ll Ac t y4j(il) iN Lbg - 7z-ci&z) ur w ~by - 3ER.C/~) w-4@45'/o(>R)
, C c+c iaI.C.f u
~Y
+
0LJ7+ @
l5.Gr2.5
SU~EOT FULL FL>'W LU E OiL STRA IN ER. eaour TYP RS. No. ~~ Sheet of Shta, CAL BY XL T'RANKKtL OF LoAbh FR< M IDYLL'T g OUT LCT'HOKKLEh To TAvK sH<it Ho~zizs.: (sxgrcH P.ts )
ASSo&E eHvg oHE Ho4ht t Peg TAHE 5t cs NC
~
LeA1% PRO& ~C (HECT g OVT<6 r )JG4%LE'Sf
"~ Fr.~ Fa.:
y=
l FR. I f Fig I~~+i3
=as/k No KRC.E S 4)A~i":
g]ace ~= w (m<h SK I v>>= w.~~~~. (;~+~Fj...)(z)bv.6LR 8
= (i>>+i>>(')( s.l.~) 8 5 3/ Pg gp( L5g'l Fa. leg Fa our
'a
/VORRLEg 2 Alp - (~<jpg ~F1,p)(l)(li b l3) .(>'Zq ~VOL)(~)(gJ,Q)P e 8 2 07/~ 7 /jll LSy a)Fiz.~ F6:
iZ F6/s,;
Fb,~ t6,"., ~" ~ zo ~ L4-
/ ~ppp aceg
<) p'= (Fb;~ F'<;,')(x)(igloo)) Ce" ~~)(t)(cpu) 8 j
= go/.5
~p'0 Qp c.Cg
jL ('Fb'- /b..,),g(qi0~) =
zqgc) zH. 6 g
p t ULL FLoW LLJE,F OIL ~i TRAtHEk, eaom TYP RG. No. lO-DBS Shoat of Sh?s.
CAL BY 8/26/>+
$ >f5,6
--
(Fs,- F h,, () ( .z - v)( )
4 go4%v6g ag Fh,F'k,~:
~
(F8 -Pk )
~Pc RRc.FS
~ ~ 'oy
=
Y Py - zg ')(/i,sc>) (<<y wry) (i)-(n.<cry 8
w -44' p/~+'Fb,> Fb +) (is) (6iv vilo)(iz)
X pro Z4l 55 Z Fb,.";
= (F8,z ~b +,) ('i)(ir6~r) (7~> -~) (z) (vc6is3 3
- 2. 7f 4 i / lu s
- L 4+
8
= (r-b,,~ t h,+,)(i~) (go~+.) (i~)
)QRR Lc. 5 L
FUI-l- t l.ow vila Ole Cl RAIIIER C - IO OROLP RG N Sheet i8 af Shh.
mL sV 8/2 ~/w-c) [rooc FC.
- Fc+'c+
F -F , KE I-l23 hlo+KLC. L
<)
poor goALy, cesE. o>, p. II3:
Fy
+ =.
- p. = 6 (+L-*) L=2iL a.-
cC i)(F " "<<cJ zs s,g 6~5 IL,6 aj c
(2LIc- p~ ) = ~/~
Fc ) I 2 ( I 3 it IN - LQ I. c,- f c~ ~76-" >
I'IS l '
~
~6g
+ go <a<6 $
(,vS) (ii)(3occ'3')
>gr 6iS IJ, 6ig c) ig(Fc,cr ~ I'c.,j '>e ~u L (2cr 3
~ oo~~icS
)g 6 yg I f o6 L S
= l2< ~~in ~'oor) l"(IC3 '4) 29'J 3
<<)~Cooj h) I
+ F'cia "" adT ~~70 t~~~
/OR+ 5 (t Fy CFc,- F I )(>r'I (-'ll-3zl (i\(>I) 2Q 3 '
IC 6 /0,6>5
'c) Q z - i (F2c Itl co lb>>( j~e 3II)-
l$
gU~E~ FULL I ~4& L~4'C QlL R t k.Av<C mOuI C JO TYP RG. No.
GAL BY z
0 I
I z
0
+
O z b) I'ly
+
I 0
CAMl.
gU~~ FUI.U FLDw LDEE OIL C
~TRAI<KN c-P TYP RG. No. Sheet ZO of Shts.
CAL BY
<2 Fa+ I4: rsvp///ulcc'b 5 0 .'
/'46~ /6...:
Fi8a& //>'/98K' CPS'8 '3 7 P//g
=R ('~) .y L= 23.
= 6' (gL -~)
( $ 7?.W 1I Q PI@
~) fiam /des', dgM:v, /.//>:
Ega.- gq.g =
pl<
&>> &l 3!"L cg
+bw +~~aug Zfia L ~
7g (..IH, >>pJ .7g (iL 5 1l-l<)
LQ 3 Q.,(n
/7,'6 Z p / 6' t)
) p: - ~be-r <<(s ~i-]i): NFa i~
5
FvW. MW Lv K6 ~tL. Sl l~hlA~K.
L~
gU@ECT GROlP Re. No. Shoot >/ af Shta.
CAL BY F] Fl~!!!!! N C, pgAHE!.A'TC to 0, p
+ !!e,+Hc,(<Q(~el+<<<3 avf
@5 szS. 7 b) A y = (gFp ( is (!.t') xt i~<!'(!r iver!).
3 I'l7/,$ /8-C4~
8 Pp c.
g c y (Q(yq) ply)
+ plo~kt,c. 5 M~,+AC, t>(al.o eP~X) g (<~q l C (x)
\. I K. (l5.6>J5 p (! iL )(>ggi~) aJ - l.4+
7.o 5 g, 7 8
~c - Hc l.(l Ac '
).
+
~>!! Rc ~ ii(<!!l-'B<) <q
- l. C <1 ) y ( I h)
/!! y = (i!(F~)(<! 6U~ ( L) (!'l,! ) (u'6'L!
~
8 8
) pg H,z + c~< zt(991 3!31$
= Ob>E'-~4'
Qe FLow 4'u KE. Qlc Cli2AIHKR. C-I<
RG No 22 Sheet of Sos.
uu sv Si23 jXy 8c,, Wc+
- 22) 'F+=
8 : ~t,~) a (.1~)
- 2. (. F~ ) C~r.ecr) cg3.si )(iroc3')
g c) p)( rVc +COol- i3.(X3OF 3CO)
'= Jggp X
0
¹ Plo+ W (C$
6J CoNPCLAT<oN OF I RAHC feR'Peg /Mal.e LCO*bC
'q Fv.')
Fy =
Fg> + Fx< = ~F3.3+2.nx = 6Y$ 5 Lbg
~) Fy -
Fy + p> =
~~ ~~py = all Lbg X Fy,'
0 zq
+ '+
O I '5) < I ~ ~ F Yy - 2(LAPGJ f'4'fl 4 > - 0 "rcl z
Fyi + Fy< "FYoi
=
&33 + 2.el+ i~i 8 "- 'is 6:S 0
~F-= . '.
f ~ "t F~ + F+>- fogy 3'/pv 3K',g "-
By/,g Q~
- 6) F4 = FZ + I'+++ FK> = '663,3 0 /332 3P 5 %.= 2'52VJ+.'I
~'l x:
<<q Ax =
P1x+ Nx~ = 62ov e sszcx = @733'j w-t5<
6)8x: iitp + <x< =
l2is+v63's. -" 8866 Q jiff;
@ Ay= py> + p7y2 +/ye =
l6ol p+il9yvi27ls=seUio.c6>
s)
Ny =
Ny, + Ny~~ayz = no~.6+Shl~zosv',7 =/wf).3 63 ~~:
0+ Pa, t s22. = 23 26 2
a) = ~ I'1a <isa~ - col.2 +iso3 6 3 m 2 e iilfh/ + /fan t g< = aoxV,2% /363 + S'3S2'78/;2 IO
l CK ~ IA ~ ~
RANEE'.
FULL FLoW LU5E QlL S1 OkOVF TYP RL5 RG. Na Sheet M of Shh, gy 8 gt/7P Hj Dlo<'o&ENTAYloN OP TRANLF'EgpED goK+lc LaAgg '
gi- (
F y, = +6%5, g Lb<, - Kll LI+
FY= +>>&.S L4q, - <<-~.e+
Fh=+ 8'll.S L4~ '~- lying,g LIl iH) 4 Ll)Bi/ IH c'4g ) 8 BC6 w-LL< .
p HY + %(41 I tH LQ j IYl893nr 5,'~ X~
AK + 2s sag'3 lN L4y~ "s 78/,Q N.t.g~ I o
I
II *
-',"U~ I.ui- r" Luis; Q)~ =pi(p,i~i<< oooo C RG. No Sheet M of Shts.
CAL BY 82m O TAH V. 5 HCI < IH )Q6 iE < 1 Y J I >RikaH TAa aEl<KlC. Bt HbiNQ ~pi2C(t c7 t
= I-o~4r n orNHC 5T'rc c'A d~d 5 C/J ~/p g.Np+g, ( Rcvhirlgg r~ Pc /r pc/~IWc.
AT l3 -2 P ]C -rl.dLJ = 3A',+ iu 3 0 zz.
( P,Sg
(~.<)
"/p)(l'L) g( I>S QJ(~)(gg-y/,p) g~~ (>(, g)
=+is4. I
'"'/ >
il
",~~ uii )ioW I LueE Qi STggiHZP No Io -O 0S RG Sheet of Shta.
CAL BY L a ~s/~
3 K GlcMH Fi'6< Q QH blH ro CpiEr i ic 6 t) v r 7~ Jl/o y~( g gQA ii6
'lT t~ f ~v 8 LQ SAT QE FcLLumtHQ l oAb~ Cog't~< lg vga MW Y LANK c4~5 R VA TtV C $ 6 HQlfFQ Lgg Qg po ~g l-CH P.>3 )
++gal.,SIi.e Rg H> = l>,6'(FV) i My
= la,g ('l i Hi6$ + +Si 6 .- ~i +88, 6 iH -L) g P$ py = i;r(ry) (~)('Fp)+ H)
= n.S(~ii') <<(e)(2~-LS.S') + iqiZS,>) >>oiler,iH--le I/ i' l.
bt V~o>(o Rc cr
+
-
Sri>ess MPob g
9 Al
~LuE
=
Pg H.
To Lloà 4uo~.7 -+'ll7o.
gogz<v 6 + 87ol.l.,I 5 64/
Leppy
//H
<
'26op7 I) a = ~g YX~'f 7 g,~
AREA /<(g, gg, L y g- /u F~
- (io'- iS.Pl-)
F}
CooihiHeh 6tH eH EiL STso sr@ 6 !
O = ~+~ + + +-cr l +os'+c 0 +
I dye ~
tie.i+f8,6+ u>5, 3 S <i~v, C+ 7S,q =
~S eo,~ jw.
~s a
l
+~~ ~
~+~
P 5 1( l, I + Fc,~+ li'70,5 + w1 (
- J1oG ~ l Thai Q
+ HL46,7 /iH~
t us.s- fMsss Luge Ola STRA(HC 6 RG. N
, CAL BY NSIH Q WRC QOl L.6 T'Ihl I>1, 7HC I-DC 6E PRI AHP l 5'l PE'Sr ~S THE ~A~~ SHEI.~, OVC F ~ VERY CoI4EERVd H~'%+I-6 ~DO f oN P.2.3 *g.E SHOm 8 >IVY'R.AI4SFKRL64 OA Qht'h 'SHEE, T, P.L'7> F POD PQIHT Oug,P, X5, SIHCE:Pt< 5 H6AR IH'r6HSI t'r i f <ma((, gapa@.TIDE 2. F'ak 7He CoebIH6 l-R.e~S IOTGH(Ir r uH beer-8 S~F7, P. ~7, LVI>i I 7s-34,i '7$ 36,2 7l(I'Nsgi
~), =
Sy($)+a~ 78<9./ /ohio 9 los 0, Q -9o) tl / ->oJ O',I 2 ~ ~1 4 R 2.'19~ 7 m.= 5 -~01,/ .il KP9',7 p2I4' lo897, loZ37,I >f96,X 0
I 0
z
~IJ H 5AFET'r F8ct"u r2 f. S. -"
9oaov P5/ <ftA 8 "4'2 A~- ~
$ (7oOD Z,64 0 ~e il 2t Y, 7
i LILI 7'I asm LaaP(. UII b 7 fdlSIIILfc H2g a a~by
-XTabto 5-Computation Shoat for Local Strossos in Cylindrical Shells Cb g - //e,tro L= 2 )77.S C" c.b) Q Tg.- )(x&t'o, P SQ c = /s.cis I)
(P. g.f'g te AS ~ li04 I ooo Radial loof,
~ 2. Geoee ~ Iris Poionerera 'c L/2 Mr ot) w =
Circ, Itaieant ~ 1>>.C 1;~ lb. Ou IIL I.".lan~ ~ lb ROUND Loilp Honiont a ~
'T ~ talon Houont, si e Vc ~lb st/+lan Ib>> (0.4)$ )~ 0 Rin e3 OL Au Bu ATTACHMENT Shoot Load, Sheer Loode VL T~VIb 5II~ I ~ ConceniI ~ Iion due I ~
~ ) Ieenbiano Ised, Kn I/
2I Oueu Hrr ~r. 0 I IS)1 b) bondtnp leod, Kb Vessel Ihicl I ~ aa, uCL X/
Atteclvaent rudiva, r 'HOT EI Ent ~ I oil 4tco valves in
~ ccoidence arith ~ ipn convention Yo ~ aot Iediv ~ ~ CYLINDRICAL SHELL F~ Rood cvrvsa Course ~ ebsolvt ~ valves ~ f STRE$ 5ES if lead a ~ OSSOIII ~ thor shove, teeerse ~ ipns shove Flp lor ~ II~ I ~ ~ Iid enter I ~ @ii) I ~ Av AL Bu BL Cu CL Dv OL His Sc d/Rie 7 89 '/ In'/I y Fa Kb ~
,o L5 IC 2A Hc/ Rut/i 0 /7$ C) /'7it 0 /7f 0
~ I IS
.I)/ g sar/ Ruff Ag 2~
HIS 7)S'7
~HL/ N~>/7 77 77SS 14 ~r Hier
, CIOBQ 'I ~ I HL/a ll Add ~ Itehiotseur 4I aueueonoo +'s
~ IIS ~ Ilsaaes, ~ Ics P 4 I 5> X>+Tfa sq 1 2.'l /oS 3.'t cC H~
lr I I' Hc/Rural
/69I'0/69 Hs 2C r I +
,Ol Ne dA Itc/Rutll 5 Hs 2A da Na He \ HL HL/RntP HV~tg/ R I/)T Ha 2O or I IaL/ Reel)
Add ~ Iceluoiaollr
~ I K ateeaaia,na 4I ouu
~
vien (i = <>is')+L Ht 6fs 6fs3 1.7S L7r 7 S'l>> S6 Sheer stress duo te lee ~ Iuu Ils IIS ~ r ~ Si 2d It0 T
+
5heor arrest 40 V I ~ leod. Yc r aaS 5heor steer ~ duo VL to leod, VL Y Add Altearolcatlr fer eurenenen
~ I sacer ~ iieaaea, r 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 COII~ IHED 5TRE55 IHTEHSITTI $
I) when ny ~, tr it IIOFI Cr t I a ~ lna'I hero lthe sites 2l trhear 'O 5 4iseei ol $$ ~ Ie er IISI ~
t )
I ~
Sl Wh d~an I hoes uafko Htaa 5 t I'isis es)' ~ rr
~,
~ I l0 ,Iifrrapra irt >bohr IIR
Qd~
I IUn ',(, '"
F. F. L. 0.
~
?
JDC, strainer'C,ODf!,!i.!,
I KD
?
f\
14 ~ p 3 ~ 42r(p G ~ G J/ 1 ~ (( 1 ~
(.'.
~
(
~
/ ~ eV p ("(L',: (T,
~ 1 V'", 'lL.:
- g
~ (
p 4>o 5/ 27uu '2g ~ $ 41v3 o >y 1 17 3'i, !7S ~ Vg
( ~
P Jorp(' (
I ~ (/r' 025 g lo 3((', ~ ~ O.C4'p >2 o 35./
F:;C,F / p F 'k A/ F 2 r'1 p i~ 4 D p F 2 ('/
3 3<
~ ~ Ql, "~ 2; '025 g 1 ~ 35/ .014 I ~
" LAX=""':.:.
537 1698 o
J
~
.. 'iCn .'C.",= (
" 1102 ( ~ ~
~
i7SO SG54
'I "17 lu D":!= ~; .. 3.51 q o ~ 7755 -.r.P v 4if55
~:."
l.r
~ rFr P=
~
F~X= '130 11630
~ I r ~ ~
I gg//m Ni~Y'i~i ~/('((//(
~~4 '('d j'. gzz>: rP4z vu~p~;< -.-..;
gczupg 8/'./Wy +~jvzcj~j'.,P/"-:".
'I
~ O,', '.Pq ~ 'I ~ ~
"~ I
Ot 4> ~ AAT N(L VAICAW tATT. NO
<<~/ z.y c xc DiZ3 iy, d/A'A'///.
St.'. "45 COP A/
4 g5A'$
~ah// < WliVFg Pfd'dPAcwb
~ "alp'vP s4L d~ $gAAi+HA'gdPM VP jg/$j/h/&
/.F8-
~ i'd& /0~~~+f /HA-XZg-Pdldd SuZ/
~.a <Crx~ag SPW/h/+g
/5'/5g.x5 4 /-M IWEPg. 486 /O.P8$
t ~ ~
/Z5
~ W==.k~/. F4uiAffbkj'~g fgK FEF7 Tl
~
kfJ$7 8f- A@/ddt >'c.v'= 6I oF Pp'z$ fwd- LEE'S 7d jHg l /CCoyyaORPa g~Z MzrV,"'7/4 the/aiA ppP ig FFS Pafs jj/d/ 8'/jl~g R/7ERlh'CT. SQAÃlhFR I
I ~
~ ti~u;i5 i dddE.; A$///E--SEC foal SO 5 4/A'C,'.: ~& M)ygz>C A/$g/4& i~<'/35Cg/h/6- Oh/
t'A'Cc&
ACE Ep/$j/h+
800 8-8 j'/arV s~ir-:r~~ VNIXSS DIN(ANISE SttC. ID(CA, CEO<<CIA(0 STVSOES DNICNSIONS ~ NNAI\I 1 VSAII TI ~ I IIEA I IlACC DCC t tlACC DCC (Cal IS>Sf al at
~ IlAihlllI S I NAICN 1 C $ S CI AOVNotI($$
S t(ACC DCC ANCECS TIISCADL VN D(attl IAI~
ra(o
$ (C II tAAAllllllV tf 1 t(N OI CVEAA ANCLIAAITT ms /coypu.. Ssipgic Sf"Pf tllltftaSA le AAA
~ ACAA CONN(AS at ~ Er IIAC.
Aoh( VT I AOC tollI ION DON((NI1Iclff 1ENOYt SVAAS STVNII1I slvNAN Ioo<<n.vah t CS(ttfl Sf//>JMEA /OVil i& pOOIF: p
~ I tOIIION ~ WO ~ TIIISC501 Cotto ~ ATIOII II INC(ON (ANION CCVtttftnt ~ CACIAC DIT. SVf f1(0, A. 5,
<<Ohltlal IOCO<<ONII Ohh g Attn, g g( CW~L l$
'N "-"-"-VM NOA MNO Oh ~~ AA\
~ Ihlln I ~ IAII ~ <<Ohl INOI( h 1 ~
NOAINV CION Ol <<CAVO J cy ~ I >I I I
Calculations SUBJECT-'/ 04KB/h(<-'C"c/4 2 u8<
~o'MMAK C~u Y'OB ~rp~wEp NUMBER FILE NUMBER SHEET BY APP 0
C -/0 OF DA~
DATE Cr F F5 / 8) P //
FE /- Z Pid
'4 F
('w wein . r c'(4 T'c F Acct Fc.FAF+cccccf C
r (4
F
.TK4' ~l ; cr cc I6 Cd~~y FA +c,cAA~ 1o Ei A,<~ .OEEE WS/ rn l<.r&PPd~ CHAFE PF 5K PLATO. SW I r / ,'7c cr.'-~EEOC Fr>
r< /~7'~ ~E/ ~ 4&l
~~gf 4(r r/ g IM 8/EE g,g4 3 rrt Cr A dcS (F
Qr O
z
- 12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET CION'RO. Qiagai L~OL: Qc, Pi-,
Unxt N Bldg. Location
/8- J9 Installation dwg.. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
~ g I i V~'(%e) 0-6"
~
~ ~ ~
g
~ ~
~ g
~ ~
g ~
I ~
~ I ~ ~
>
~ g 5 g Type Qol %5 Cfyp)
) I sc& L Drawn by: Date:
(',iL Verified by: Date: '2--') -/2 Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed 'by:
onstructz.on Anchor Review Engineer Date: l Page 1 h~
of 3
- 12 CHP 5021-CCD-019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 C OR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Give LMM'ic /i i Unzt Bldg. Location
/2- 3zae - Ql -/13-A82 Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
- Q/z Drawn by: Date: 5 Verified by: Date: r3 ~A+ Q~"p )
Qu ./Ce t. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: G lc 5'<
nstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~ ~
~ ~ a i e 0 ~ ~ II
~ ~ ~ ~
r
~ ~
o ~ RSR%RRKi%WW&W .
a a o o mRSRIN WALLS 0 ~
wwweaarr m55555LSRL s ~
RSmmmRHE%
RRHHRRHHEL mRSmmELSL lIRSHRRELLL
~ II II MW&M MWW 0
s1 ~ I ~
~
hl
'rr ~
~JUL i sir ~~
- +12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ipment No.: l-6 t- II3-8 Dwg No.: l&3cÃV-//
edded Steel Dwg. No.: ~lb PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Held ID Held T e Codes T e 1 = Fillet Size 2 =
3'lL Plug/Slot Len h = Groove 3
Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Lack of Penetration Yes c3g9 CRh Yes QtV HZP Yes Yes No Yes No
'esNo Yes No No Yes No Porosity Yes Yes Yes es Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No 5~7'PGR< QQac.~ - evhu s Qg~ggg (gal.kl0%bb 0
0 Ecpxipment hase flexible: Cl Yes 8 No ons ruc won e Date: cP-Reviewed by: Date:
ons ruc ron c or evzew ngxneer V 'ed by:
. er
~/'a
. npsec or Date: ~'~ ~ 'i Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
- 12 CHP 5021 CCD 019 ATTACHMENT NO ~ 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ipment No.: - GT- i(3- 6 mbedded Steel Dwg. No.:
PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Weld ID Weld T e Codes T e Size 1 = Fillet 2 = Plug/Slot Len = Groove 3
Cracks Yes ~Ys Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No Lack of Yes Yes Yes @Ys Yes Yes Yes Penetration 0 0 No No No Porosity Yes 0
Yes es Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 65 No No No SQPPoR 7 QRhc.k. - E'YFh~s Qg~ggg $ g>c.atoll ~
0' fP)
~ I a O Ecpxipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc son re Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
ons ruc son c or evxew ngxneer V 'fied by:
er Date: 0 35 9" ua ; . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
Len h = Groove 3
Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
'Lto Yes No No Lack of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration No No No Porosity Yes Y s Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No 50PPoR 7 QPhck c- EYRi~s
+KCT Qg~gg+ (<xc,Kf4%'bb Ecpxiyment hase flexible: CI Yes 8 No ons ruc won re Reviewed by: Date:
ons ruc ron c or evxew ngzneer ified by: ua . e . npsec or Date: ~ r 5 y.'age 3 of 3 Revision 1
'I 4
~~j.~ ( riP 4021 CCD 019 ATTACHMENT NO- 1 ipment No.:
mbedded Steel I/
Dwg. No.:
ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET g
g .: ~g PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Weld ID Weld T e Codes T e 1 = Fillet Size 2 = Plug/Slot Len h = Groove 3
Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes QRD 0 No No No Lack of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration cKRP 0 0 No No No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Cgg) 0 o No No No 507'PoQ~ QQ&ck - EYRg 5,
~ I O (Hi(.k8%&:
BS.RC.kC 7 Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc 1on re Date:
Reviewed by: Date:
ons ruc 1on c or ev1ew nglneer V 'fied by: Date:
ua . e . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
Equipment No.:
~
~ ~ ( - G~-<6 - RSX Tightness established by "Snug Fit" Tight:ness veri fied by:
Qual. /Cert. Xnspector
)pP Comments:
Equip ID: 1-HE-,13 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 1-5129A 1-5135
.ction: RI
~
~
Sys tern: CVCS Equip Desc: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: CONTAINMENT Room: REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM, AZ 295 Elev: 612 Sort: S, Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power.Req'd: N Support System Drawing:
Req'd Support Comp:
Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Mfr: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO Model:
Elem. Drawing:
Wiring Drawing:
Power Source:
Walkdown: F G Relay Eval : N Comp Type: HEAT EXCHANGER XSO Drawing:
Location: ON THE CONTAXNMENT WALL SIDE OF THE RM
DC Cook Unit 1 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 1 ID: 1-HE-13 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
==
Description:==
EXCESS LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: CONTAINMENT Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: REGENERATIVE HEAT EXCHANGER RM, ON THE CONT WALLSIDE OF THE RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS It!DUSTRIAL MANUFACTURINGCO BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate fiexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom, Yes
, vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank.
C~MMEE.'Q SRT: George G. Thomas (SS A) and Tom Huang (AEP), April 13, 1995.
l Ref: Unit'1 and 2 Anchor Bolt Schedule (Drwg. ¹ 3073A-3 and 3073D), and Unit 1 8 2 Containment Building
¹ Concrete Floor (Drwg. 1-2-3207-23)
Relatively small exchanger (1600 Ibs) on two saddles in extremely high rad area.
Could not inspect anchorage due to it being hidden from view with insulation. Removal of insulation was not performed because of ALARAconsiderations.
Anchorage includes four 3/4" diameter J-bolts, embedded at least 2 feet into piers. Due to large anchorage (four 3/4" bolts) and small exchanger, the anchorage is acceptable by SRT judgment, Evaluated by: Date:
iz /~ /~s
01/16/92 PG. NO.539 SAFE SHUTDOuN EOUIPHENT LIST (SSELMP)
FUHCTIOH: ESN Equipment Class: 2'I Train: 2 Eeiirment IO: 1-HE- IBE Drawing Nunbert 1-5113 I-51C4 Svstem: COHTAINHENT SPRAY Enufo
Description:
EAST CONTAINHENI'PRAY HEAT EXCHANGER Rui lriing: AUX I L IARY Room: E CONTAINHENI'PRAY HEAT EXCKAHGER ROOII Elevation: 609 wnr~l state: Desired state: Power Required: N Sort: u, Siaoorting System Drawing Number:
Required Interconnections and Supporting Components:
fetv Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Hin/Opt: HIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION 4l ias Number: Power Train: NA Cnmcx nent Served: EAST COHTAINMENT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER wsnufacturer: YUSA Node l:
oanel:
EIem Drawing: H/A wiring Drawing: N/A cower Source: N/A ualtdown: F Relay Only: NO Comoonent Type: HE ISO Drawings:
Detailed Locatian:
.DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 1-HE-18E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
EAST CONTAINMENTSPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: E CONT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: YUBA (VERTICAL)
BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring- pe foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A C LL 0 T?
~C)JJV~N$
SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93.
ery well engineered support structure.
There is a ring support at top of the exchanger bracketed to the wall in each of the 4 quadrants. This takes the overturning loads on the exchanger.
Bottom support (at about the 1/4 point of the exchanger, with the remainder of the exchanger hanging below) is a heavy duty ring with gussets at the bolt locations. These are bolted to a steel support structure that is obviously well engineered.
Qualification data (Yuba Heat Transfer Division Calculation 69-G-226) indicates an analysis to the design basis.
Based on the inspection and anchorage data collected the Heat Exchanger is adequate.
Evaluated by: Date:
cQ > /I g
/8- ~ - fi
Attachment:
Pictures
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 1-HE-18E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
==
Description:==
EAST CONTAINMENTSPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: E CONT SPRAY HEAT EXCHANGER RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: YUBA (VERTICAl)
ELC3XKE>
BASE GUSSETED SUPPORT TOP SUPPORT
P. O. BOX 3158 ~ TULSA, OKLAHOMA74101 o (918) 939.2201 YUSA ItlOUSTA!SS, lNC.
December 7, l971 American Electric Power Two Broadway New York, New York 10004
,C~~~ F'LA~>
ORD - grD f,gpss Attention: Mr. R. A. Kadlec ~rCTIDN Mechanical Engineering Division E~~GtNV;.q DATE
Subject:
Indiana & Michigan Electric Company ~LEANT LIPEy~ME Donald CD Cook Nuclear Plant DATE TO PLANT Contract 1241 Containment Spray Heat Exchangers 0 NOH pERHAHENr HlNQfUM g~~N~
Yuba Job Number 69-G-226 Gentlemen:
Qe are enclosing ji refer
'
to a six (6) copies letter of Novem b""
~ ~
'f o our Seismic Stress Analysis for the subject gob.
Qr 9 1971. written by your Mr. A. Sherman,
~ ~ ~ request'ing additional a clarification. As a resu suit we have completely rewritten this a y
- as Rev. 2.
Please return one (1) i
( ) copy in d'cating your approval and/or comment nts at our earliest convenience.
Uery truly yours, YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORATION B. F. Forman Des ign Engineer BFF:dc cc: Mr. A. Sherman Main File Eng. File I
/U J 1
Y \/."!< .!!::/s7 1 8 N"SF 0!'l V I S I Ql~ Page 1 op
>U3/s l(vov ~>ales, Inc, Rev. 2 Seismic S trc. s Anal vsis Indiana & Michigan Electric Company Donald C. Cook tiuc lea r Plant Contract 1241 Containment Spray Heat Exchangers Yuba Reference 69-G-226 S tresses in the support ring structure resulting from the operating load on supports, thc forces due to seismic acceleration and operating pressure will be investigated using the refer-ences listed below.
The support structur'e consists of two 4" x 2" rings encircling the exchanger together with a 1" thick wear plate and q" shell plate. Refer to Page 5 for vertical support details.
The following stresses will be calculated:
- 1. Longitudinal bending stress due to shell acting as a cantilever beam and loaded with horizontal seismic force.
- 2. Bending stress in ring structure loaded with operating wt. and vertical seismic and horizontal seismic force acting at center of gravity of exchanger.
- 3. Circumferential and longitudinal stress in shell due to pressure in shell.
The period of vibration'is determined using References 1 and 2 below:
- l. "Introduction to Matrix Method of Structural Analysis", by Harold C.
Martin, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1966.
- 2. Yuba Computer Program to determine loads and reactions in structures by the direct stiffness method per reference 1 above. The program also
/
I calculates the natural frequencies of structures. See discussion on Pages 10 and 11.
"LIU/i I SCAT TRANSF!. R 0! Vl" IYOUSTalas, INC.
IQl':.'OA
(' .. 'u <g u / l~ U 4 Page Rcv.
2 ci k
W = 94.4 Total Operating Wt. ~
<Vertical, Acceleration Av = .17
~
- Horizontal Acceleration AH = .3 A = 10/12 Ft-B = 18/12 Ft.
C = 9.42 Ft.
(See Fig. 2 Page 5)
D = 3.46 Ft.
E = 6.92. Ft.
6 = 45' k
HF = W x AH = 94.4 x .3 = 28.3 VF = W x (1 $ A ) = 94.4 x 1.17 = 110.4 2 PE Sin 8 = VF D Sin 6+CHF
. 2 P x 6.92 x .707 = 110.4" x 3.46' .707 ]
9.42' 28.3 P = 54.9 k (Vertical reaction at one support)
'Zhe following forces are horizontal components acting normal to the rings. Tvo forces act at each support - See Fig. 2 Page 5.
A x P '/12' 54.9k 22 . 8 k (Force due to moment caused by ver tica 1 Rl 2/3B x 2 2/3 (] 8/] 2 ) 2 reac Lion)
HF/2 Sin 0 28.3 /2 x .707 I 1= 4x2 = 1.25 (Horizontal shehr in each ring)
HF Sin 6 28.3 k x .707 hg = = 2.5 k (Force due to moment cuased by horizontal 4x2 4x2 reaction)
U i' (.' i
".,I-:l 7 Tf? ANSF ER DIVISION Pago 3 o ~
YVOfi'IIIDVSTAICS,II6c. Rev. 2 R= l~, h 1
~I h 2 -"228'k ~125k>25k I
= 26.55 k, 24.05 k (Total horizontal force acting normal to the ring See Fig. 2 Page 4)
Using 2" Rings and the loading "R" shown in Figure 2, calculations were made to determine stresses.
For stress in rings see Page 6.
Stress in Shell (Due to HF Acting at CG) k M = 'F x C = 28.3 x 9.42' 12 = 3200 in k (Moment in Shell)
Section Modulus Where d = outside diameter of shell, in.
(d4 d 4) di = inside diameter of shell, in.
= .049087
~
R 43300 30 3 = 1426 ill M 3 200.000 in lb Stress =
S
=
. 1426 2245 psi Shell Stress The above calculations were based on the horizontal & vertical acceleration given in your specification 42373-NK. I The accelerations used to obtain stresses correspond closely to those obtained by calculating the natural frequency of the exchanger see Page 9 for values plotted on the response spectra curve it Floor EL.633.
I The natural period of the exchanger as obtained from our computer program and based on loadings shown on Figure 1. Page 4 is 1.275 Second (maximum).
~('
f
~ ~
v' V jI (. I, ~,.r.. Q,"
y i ~
)
k
~~ 'I 0l
(.
Wrr7r& C. C Hr- C..
C C
Og t Qa' 0
(I) 4 O
('Xl+ ++ OO 7~-'ll rt~
c'as" .
c 5i
/rr 'g" t:f Hcg I
I S+7W 7 SS r/
7u4< Sr' . ,r
/r Phoo 6+~7'nA Or~
,:7~
(K
.~zS Wa I:
/ -~o' ~WC>
QOyZ'7.
l(Q l kic=zG ir 7S
~
~ rm II'LVO < 11'L" V6i};:,.A VS!M7 '1 I..'.~ I."i:.."i'-FL Ci~e~f'O'LCAVlIf.u;.-'iI ~
I.i
- s. cvvvIIIIrIIvoI Y~i:A COI:."r~iIufTZC> l!:Dl1~Tl'.lI.".. ll!C.
(
4 1%.".t 0
~
0 0
~ ill h I I AVI:
~tr 'I'A 3515 Ol 'V .ON lmAO. 1'Ut ltWLV
'a. 0! LAf<Q1.1A 0Vo'C.
ez-g- ~=a -/
'
'l l ~
~ L r, ~
%Iran'
~ J 0 '4 ~~ v 4 4 dA~r IV J A U llha ~ ~~ J ~ ~ ~
YUUh HLAI1'AANSF 613 Ol VISION Q I\ :j. I'. !J:;. 4, 4 aI Pa e Go.."
YVOA IMDVSTAIFS, INC. Rev. 2 STRRSS I!; Rl;;CS Reference "Formulas For Stress 6 Strain" by Roark (See Page 7)
Miome'nts in Rin 17'
-~
=
=
28'os Cos e
()k
-
=
~
.9563
= .8830 26.55 k x 31.5" R ='26.55 k r = 31.5" 2
=418 in k
'MR = - ~3-R r (--
1 e
Cote)
MR' 5 R r ( si e
-)
1 e
M'0 = 4 R r (sin .
1 -) 1 e e R
(Cos o( 1)
Sin e e MR = -418 ( 1
.7853 1) = -113.8 in k (Moment at load due to load) Q Oc. plH5
= 418 ('8830 1
.7853 )
= -10.4S in Ic (Moment at R'ue to load at R)
.707 1 1 418 (
.707 .7853 )
= 59.4 in k (Moment at 0 due to load zt R) 418 (
. 9563
.707 1
.7853 }
= 33.4 in k (Moment at 0'ue to load at R)
MR (Total) = (113.8 + 10.45) = -.124.25 in k in k 1
M0 (Total) = (59.4 p 33.4) = 92.8 Moment of Inertia of Rin T
.3 3 2 x 4 15 x 1.5 1= 12
+ 12 q L 8x 22+22 5m .752]
QF.
I= 59.51 in4 S
- 59. 51 = 14.9 in3
~ll~ ti RADlVS Mc Max. Stress (at load) or I
-124250 in. lbs.
8,350 psi (in 4" x 2" ring) 14-9 in3 a 22.5 x .75 8 x 3.5 CG = 2 x 4 $ 1.5 x 15
-124250 in. lbs. x 1.5" 59.51 in 3,140 psi (in shell) 5II
isa.re: o',
Y'J13fs r'L;AT TftAl"SFCR DIVISrQN YVOA INOUSTAISS, INC.
Copy Taken From "Formulas For Stress and Strain" by Roark Tauu: VIII. Fonstur~s ron Clncof,*n Braes win Ancnns Bf'n 2'n Vn Bf, T, and V arc positive xvhcn as shosvn, negative ivhcn reversed. Allapplied forces and couples arc positive svhcn as sirocco, negative svhcn reversed. The follosving notation is ctnploycd: g w niodufug~ of f
elasticity (lb. ppr sq. in.); ~ moment of incrl,ia bf ring cross section (in.'); 1V or F as shovrn ~ applied load or I y/~ ' reaction (lb.); w ~ applied load (lb. pcr lin. in.); l: ~ freight of contain'd liquid (lb. pcr cu. in.) ~ ~ si<< ~
~ cosa;s ~ sin 0,c ~ cos0;n ~ sinO, c ~ cos O; p sruti,q ~ cosp. Allanglcs~uradians,distanccsin NI ' ~i 2 inches, forces in pounds, moments in inch-pounds. +D, or +Drncans incrcasc, -D, or -Dmeans decrease in diamctcrs. +drR means increase, -aR means dccrcasc, in upper half of vertical diameter. C TI trtn VIII. FolMULAs l'OR ClncvLAR Itngcs A'Ho Ar'cncs.(Confinucd) fzalin ruppxe and Formulas for tending moment II, eireumfere rfsl 4ensfon 2', rsdtst shear V at a u!ar dieesneo r from toirnm o ting and for Vi. shan't in Lairosut drnmeeer, cow numM and D,. change in versiesi dismerer f bx fdK under sny num l /u
~ eton ~ I) It'-frI!(---):hfag+If ~ l rfP/ /l x l /l eor sr each hf ~ --frP(-
of equal radial (a c)" 4s e) at o,h,dd, htss (o I} load forem cqusay spsad I Il/ r ~ -l 'I r eot C at toads.
IO'~./,0
' load foist ~ -@L (y+,e I '
Z(b.-. 0 Jlr ludisl disrtseement ef each 2n.L,
'
(2 2 lrlfs/2 1 'X ) .fnsrsrd ftsdisi dupfae me t se r 0, 2I, In, ere. C-Ilr gal (C ~ ss)
. VU/i II::Al 'I IIAisSICI:II OIVISIQN YVOA ftaovSTRIES. tNc.
SUlMARY OF STRESSES Combined Lon itudinal Stress s
Longitudinal stress due to pressure =
r x - .2 2t p ghere r = inside radius of shell, t = shell thickness & p = design pressure 2x 5" .2 x 150 psi = 4,470 psi Combines stress = pressure stress + bending stress (Page 3)
4,470 + 2,245 = 6,715 psi h Combined Circumferential Stress Circumferential stress due to pressure
r x - .6 t ~
p Combined stress = pressure stress $ bending s tress (Page 6)
= 8,910 +3,140 = 12,050 psi Shear S tress s
'Xhe shear stress in the shell can be ignored since the ring structure takes the load in bending.
ggll alii 5alll ) ~
gmgg~~
gg gggg
~ g55I
~SR
~ g
'<<i'..cc'ice!i
'j'his procvc(ct7 uses the direcL sti.'.i'(.ss Ur Lilod as si:o-:n b> Ii. C<< I.'artif! jn s';AL') i;( f'jnL'hlods ol. Stl.uctul:al tlnal)'8).s l
~
Xn the case or: "-
been a:ith a distributed load, the load is d'vide(. into f an...
pOint lOadS SpaCed alOng thf: Laealf}.
g i:/f't.
L = len('th The problenl (!ould be appzo>:ifvated as F
t:
'
F F F p I'I~I/ ('<<1) )<he) e H = 'fao ~ pk Load l pints Fro}fr here t >e program calculates ti:e nov>'<<ts at each loari point and th reactions at each load point and the reactions at each support. Also, (:ith the input:, the natural fzcque;.cies may be calculated.
'Co find tl.e natural fze(Iucncv tnc stiifness:".atri>: Sound above is used in r.:;:"'.
the sa.,~a @ay ..". spring constant in a vibrating spriqg and'rf".ss systera. For a spring F = "IZ F=- hl
. X I oo = -g: buL for an of;cillilting 4
8)'S teal rrC4 }IV $c/ is in radians/sec v l ~ <<I I aa <<a ~~w vhv J~ or (W' Z N ta
);;-0
[CD EY.p J AIf~
'iV = g/~phd '
fa}O i ('l<<l <<I<<<<I<<<<Illa lc II I pre ~ cly cf Ercq ..- ~/Z g rye le<</ccc lllcl Yrvracflr I)!ci~ ivr., '<<ld I ~ rc I lc. Lc r ~ >'.d da'd I 4 IClc
~ ~ ~ I \I l J l, I <<Ir I IC<<C l Cr 4 l val ~ ~ ~
f,l ca Crr.rr fr.V<< ll<<C l f<< r V<<.lcf Il I ~ CCCC<<l .C<<l, ~ (V ~ ra} ~ t C<<f ~ VII(<<CCC I'I~ 4f CICr Jl Cl ll 0 l C<< l Ca'vr I Ivr Cf ~ I (<<IVI IICA v aa<<va<<<<v~<<<<a ~l avv4 <<wav ~k a<<t J 1~ I J<<ae ~ ~ ve<<A4U
~ C<<C.C: ~ <<<<<<4<<rv vva~ v vJ cv IAa v 1
YUB.'. i,'.'}':YRI=.S. lNC. Ca<T I }I(;<< f.f I'<<l "l <I! I'(:f '>:.. (:l:.l '.ll!!I!r 'I:I(<<.::
"1 1 Fo our case F =: 1', aa! Ia "r'e 1 1S 'Lh<.: S t it llfeS fr i'eai tr ) .".
I r-; F f.t point loGds O'Ad are the displace.~. nt.. at the point loads. p wt+ 2)e vllere H =- hV 2 or "11 )i X . KZ, where X.. or (1' H tf ) X = 0, since'tlie displecer.ents "re not nll equal to Zero the deterninate of. thc 1!atria (1; + H X.) aust equal Ze.o. Then W'=~7'nd P -.. W cycles/sec.. 2 A 4 ev e v PLRv ~ vev v ' lie.alt -%Let 4tnvle.g> 11 11 a fena till CI Ievbt ftnhatae fteaetfCte ~ ~ hV ~ I Vl IC 1 V 1 ~ eV e Ovnta IC ~ 't vlf ~ tet Iti pCII ~ hOf I ~ Cr I . ~ ge'r pre ~ ehntt Othtt It.nn Il.nt fn ~ a haah il ea tr'l ~ 'IeCCelf f at hlahnef ~ vllhnvl It.et C v 0 ~ 4 tvl Cf Iv LC tta 41 Tent.liat fraeetecee
'$Ij" 'at ~ '
ve vvvear k4it4A a ~ ra acr A'L~ v re A ~e pv JNrv vh eva e~> dva vlNkbr e'a' rreaeaealwre ~vie 'AAwAA,av e ee r ~ teaa et, TITI.Ir
/I4+ je 1 ~ I' ' . a ' I' ~,aa ~
I I (I pt(Z ~ ~ ~ lw Vl
~ ~
C cate. fJLeefw a ~ e s'a i ~ ~ af e ~ aa ~ I ~ J ~ Y U'5r 1r"i~hIS'1 f1'L: lflC .at r. 0'cela". t (: tr'Or'a wl aell I lf. 'era i.'I' etc!II ala I'I'I. I L'h.:.4 i
XNSTRUC LIONS FOR XNSTALLATXON, OPERATXON AM) MA XIQENANCE or SHELL AM) TUBE IIEAT EXCHAlxGERS FOR AZRXCAIT ELECTRIC POHEP, P'HVXCE CORPORATXOH XIIDXAIIA8: 11XCHXOAD ELECTRXC CO&ZiQK DONALD C. COOK IICL"P3 PL~I'HXT 1 AllD 2 GUSTO."KR' PURCHASE ORDER IMBIBER Contract 1243. YUBA HEAT TRANSFER DIVISION JOB NUIIBER 69-G-226 DESIGNED AM) BUILT BY YUBA HEAT TRANSFER DXVXSXON TULSA, OKLAHOa~M,
VV'I: D HHQ,'I7 ll i;ZQ,I.JGL-;.2 L'3i"'7J"I'~"'~I.G
;,Qg ,/
P. O. OOX 3158 ~ TULSA, OKLAIIOMA 24101 ~ 19161 939 2201 69-G-226 EXCHANGER SPECIFICATION SHEET YVGA INOUSTAIES. INC, CUSTOI 1E R American Electric Power Corn. OAT F. 9-18-70 CVST. NO. 42373-P(IY PLANT LocATIQN Donald C~ Cook tguclear Plant PROPOSAL NO. OG-898-64 S ra Cooler ITEMi NO EA" 1 60-355 Vertxca'ontainment SIZE TYPE CFU POSITION 200 sHELLs PF Four NO. OF UNITS One SHELL ARRANGEMENT PARALLEL ENGRS. TEB PERFORMANCE OF ONE UNIT SH'ELL SIDE TVOE SIDE FLVIO CIRCVLATEO Lake Hichigan Ilater Boraced NaOH I ater B TOTAL FLVIO ENTERING lHR. 1 650,000 - 3300 GPI~I 1,600,000 - 3200 GPif VAPOR /HR. 10 LIQVIO v.- /KA. 1 650 000 1 600 000 STEAM /HR.
'NON CONOENSAGLES /HR.
13 FI.VIO VAPORI?ED OR CONOENSEO /HA. 14 STEAM Coia/OENSEO =/HR. 15 GRAVITY.I,IQUIO oAP I 16 VISCOSITY-I.IQVIO CP. MOLcCULAR.V(EIGHT VAPORS 16 SP. HEAT-GTV/=(aF FNTHAL.PY-GTV/='G TEMPERATURE IN oF 76 167.5 20 TEMPEAATVRE OVT 141. 5 100 21 OPERATING PRESSVRE P.S.I.A. P.S.I.G. IMPER OF P S tWO LOCITY F TJSEC. 3.7 24 pRcssuRc ORop PD. t 10 at.LowEo l,4 c" t.c. 10 aLLowEo 4. 0 cat.c. F ov'LING REslsTANcE .001 .0005 26 HEAT EXCHANGco-G.T.UJHR. 107, 850, 000 M.T.O. ~+~V-~ OF. 25 ~ 6 22'RANSFER RATE SERVICE 375 CON STR UCTI ON-EACH SHEL L 29 OESIGN PRESSVAE 150 300 GO TEST PRESSURE I a.t. 225 450 DESIGN TEMPERATURE oF 200 200 A249 TP316 No- 1150 U 0 0 5/8 IN 20 GwG.AvG.gt+;vaLL LENGTH 29 PITCH 'l 3/l 6<< > 7LYA(( 7 60<<o.
~
Steel INOM. I. O. o. 'QS SKELI. COVER IINTEGRAL Qp<~~~QItS+ F LTG. KO. COVER 26 CKANNEL. 304 S ta in less Steel CHANiiIEL COV E R 304 S.Steel Cla o? TUBE sHEETs sTATIONARY Steel 6 Overlav FLOATING GB BAFFI.Es sEGME'(TAL Steel P ITCH lt CUT F I.OW QG BAFFLE-LONG Steel IMP'T. Stainless Steel 40 TYPC JQINTs sHELL . Bo1 ted TUBES Bolted 41 GAsKETs-sHELL S.Steel Clad FLTG. HO cHaNNEL S.Steel Clad 4? CONNECTIONS-SHEI.L-IN 18 OUT 18 SEAIES CHANNEL- IN oUT t,2<< SERIES VE 44 CORROSION ALLQIVANCE SKELL SIOB l./8 TUBE SIOE E"REQUIREMENTS-as<<E 1968 Sect.I IC Tube Sec= 8 STA'.I~IYEst 6~Y TEMAcLAss 4 HTS EacH sHELI ANO GUNQI E 60 000 GVNOLE ONLY FULI- OF lvATEA 94,400 EMARKs: Edd current cesc tubes. Seal weld tuoes. Full suo ort olace a U bends.
JUL 11 M~4'i(/7I'~ 7//f C-YQBA HEAT TRANSFER CRPORATION P. O. BOX 3158 ~ TULSA, OKLAHOMA74101 ~ (9181 939-2201 July 9, 1.975 American Electric Power Service Corporation Two Broadway New York, New York 10004 Attention: Mr. Cherry
Subject:
Indiana & Michigan Electric Co. Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Contract 1241 Containment Spray Heat Exchanger Yuba Job Number 69"G-226
Reference:
Seismic Report for American Electric Power Gentlemen: Confirming our recent telephone conversations regarding,our Seismic Analysis, our 69-G-226 vertical containment spray'heat exchanger for t'e-Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, the natural period of vibration is
.108 sec. rather than .787 sec. as stated in the report.
Please note that the .108 sec. perio'd will result in lower accelerations and stresses than those in the Seismic Report. If we may be of further assistance, please contact us. Very truly yours, YUBA HEAT TRANSFER CORPORAT N WiXliam C. Newland, Jr. Design Engineer WCN/et cc:. Mr. R. H. Shaw Mr. T. R. Harrington Mr. Bill Newland Main File Engineering File , ALL AGREEMENTS CONTINGENT UPON STRIKES, ACCIOENTS ANO OTHER CONOITIONS BEYONO OUR CON o'LLCO NTRACTS ARE SVLIECT TO APPROVAL SY AN OFFICER OF THE COMPANY. QUOTA'TIONS SUMECT TO CHANGE YYITHOUTNOTICE,
712 I
"V U-TUBE EXCHANGER REMOVABLE CHAN."$=L AND COVER TOO PASS SHELL EVEN PASS TU" E SIDE TEMA CLASS 'R'ONSTRUCTION VUGG V~CaV Vna,usvt-:v. D<vrorota TYPICAL CONSTR U CTION YVOA INOVSTAI4S'NC ir~ ~ ~
FEATURES OF YUBA TYPE CFU EXCHANGER
IT e
'%f' 0 ~>V" l~ ~l g(
y(
/
rr:o /re% ro ,t/ %' r<<o ~
,0 gg~~t got 4 ~
a~/ SOAP Ctootorr ooo goo<</7 L w ooo<<<< to lo tv<<or It Coo<<
- f. ooo rtt /~tr raW/
tr rtoooota I o ~ trf ~ ao <<o C.(iPICC tS /<</<<J CC rto<</tt <<r~. .4 tp I / o J ot h> ct. ~. toI/%it Ct o oo k to/I /~ A'too J Cooo toIltoo. oC
.Sc r r/root B P g YVSA lQAT TRAPGFA NYIQIOII TIBIA WKANlWoo, poC, <<o, ~
rttr~ artoo r<< rtrrtce oo /~~r// o<<rrro ro<<oorrI rw to<<<<<<r o/II<<o ro fr&rot. to<<tD<<4 r/~ rtl'; ~ '. It 4'oI
Co Component Zo. t H 6-(8 6 Class Any particular area the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attontion to? Yes No (If yes, check items that apply.) Anchor Type Anchor Diameter hnchor Spac:fag Anchor Number
~
Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly) If there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.
- l. Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Drying Up&,te Type Discrepancy 3, Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy .
Others Condition: Actions Taken: t4 odC Prepared By T. naos > <3 7Z
~~l4 Vrxr'441.V O.ulr ATTACHMENT NO- 1 .ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Avx E.c. bog'-g u Unxt 0 Bldg. Location t 'Z- ) 5 A -0, I 2-39I >- J 1- H ~8f Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
~ ~z VI 0 ~
r 1 (a~) (AO'-0" It(OlAl(P 4ICHI( A g flQ)l 4, ~ i'l fPOi.' tahiseg rdnY MAR 2g LORY. T ELGu. i "4 Loose)6 NGS
~ g 4 4 or>' ~ ' V ~
4 ~ 0 r gp ) ( ~ Drawn by: Date: Verified by: Date: Q al./Cert.
~ ~ nspector Reviewed by: ~
Date: 8 <>83 Construction An or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021 CCD NO. 01'TTACHMENT CHOR INSPECTION DATA S EE 0 , ~ ~<T.5'PR~ %.6- R~g 0'ldg.
Location Installation dwg. / Rev. Equxpm'ent No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch kg+ p oiT, 4lh5~,HMT (STCAM) Sl'. "=
~ ~~ ~ J ~', ik I ~ g Q 2S 1995 'ngr lp~ 4 'Fg I8 W$g ig T'~ Lmt-mm,a 4'rawn by: Date:
Verified by:
~ ~
Date: Q al./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 NCHOR INSPECTION D TA SHEE A '~. Ct. Voq-o" ,~ WvT SPRR'/ ~ 6- RooI4 Unxt Bldg. Location i<- '39IS S I-HG- I55 Installation dwg. / Rev. Ecpxxpment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch II II fpll c CE 'c IVV 'i.< ~ ii II II MAR 2g the~ II I'
~
g II II II II II II
~l PLP,g Ul~ .
(B e.Oe t mme.886<I) Drawn by: 7.W ..U Date: 3- I'i< ~ Verified by: Date: qual./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: 3-aS-'f> Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEE ~! . pg q ~
40NT 5 PRA'/ H Q- Pop~ Unxt Bldg. Location 12-39 lb Installatl.on A dwg. / Rev. A 1-Equipment No.
~ - (QE.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 6I &s~/sP! 24,+jg~p4. 9
>40 50!.T,! o~<
Wh5~, NOT (~r. 5)
~
SE. CT. 'A,-A S'ECT. 5-8
!3 2/g+'/g ~ pg) ~h.~4gw) 3'/2 xg x>/y x 8'jf 4
(p~) c 4-I t<0!*!!A V.!,"'l!"t:: WOc",Kl!":" C~ IO ACCT,'c-c MAR 7 Z l~~'BCT 0-D .Drawn by: &~L4nln Date: ~-~~-'~Z Verified by: Date: Qual. /Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T- Date: Constru son An hor Pevxew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
*+12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA S EE w~t- zpn.~ w c - a<p~
Un t Bldg. Location A 0 I- l-h=- ISI:
/ >
Installat on dwg. Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch IB <</zX g" I~ I/a x Wy (STI~a Wmeg
+~ I/2 R) 5/4. cp 54l T w 1TH lo M Hh&%9 p l/+ +p~i ~ ~ll RHOT StHM K OH CIT~ Se6 Or RR HEe I~ VO7 S~WH SECT. F-E 0~ g (RW) p l I
0 I
~:>l ~ !i>i'cV. CQpy MAR 2Z 1S95 -LCRK,T 5CcT. F-F Drawn by: T AuL4esp Date: ~-' -'(~
Verified by: Date: ua ./Cert. Tnspector Reviewed by: Date: Constru son hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~ ~ +
~ ~ II s ~
~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~i ~ ~ '
LI W 1
~
KR~~~RRKR
+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v l ~
j
-
mmwmmlHmm e ~ m mml@mmR1mmRI mRSWRIRRNSNKl MWWWWW&W 5%mmRMSRRmm RQmmmRRRRR%l%
~
MW&MMWW&0 I 0 Cs 4 ~
~ r~gs r W
0 tW -~~
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Equipment No.: Dwg No.: )~- S ))SA- 0 Anchor type NR)GC t.lfeR. Dia: >/ Dwg No.:
Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 5 Torque Torque Nrench No.: ~~+ ~) ) Cal. Due Date: C 04 3 Tightness verified? 5.Yes 0 No 7- '~'~'<~'i Date: "-< )-')3 ons ruc ron Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8 No .""""<>>"l: Date: 3 '- l3 Bolt ID l 0 tL lK )'5 l S' lo Comments Caps GETw&&nJ CoNC:Q L Anchor len th Protruding len th Embedment 84 sq s4" tp g"
'"/s ( 3y 653 l)
Bolt ri /S S/j'/II" ~4. ~/g Concrete 0 00$ 40OP'oop Coop condition Cj OQQ G,OOg g o 0g (WOOLD Edge distance Anchor +(l ~rr gl l g 9/)@ 4 Il Q II s acin Anchor an larit Thread /eI m&S OK olc. oL OE Og. hJUT tsSl~" engagement T&lclL . Comments: Verified by:
./Cert. Inspector Date: +
q a Reviewed by: T- I II)Ir Nh tfil~rI Gr'll I <Wr; Date: 3- a3- qg Const ct og 'rYODK)AG COPY y;qB 23 1993 Pago 2 of 3
-Revision 1
gu4 J. ~ <i', ggg ATTACHMENT NO. ANCHOR INSPECT ON D T S 1+6-< SG Equipment No.: g No.: I- Bhi5A-a
~ ~ I D Embedded Steel Dwg. ~ No.: ~
HYSICAL C CT RIST C Weld ID Weld e Codes T e Size 3lltp 1 = Fillet 2 = Plug/Slot Len h 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes 0 No No No No No No Lack of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration No No No No No No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes'o Yes Yes Yes No No No No No R&.os 8 TYpLce io<+71()N< AAB g~6 pg, sTR084 R T-'
~~ -re-'tz INGIABO '<t SITe 0=<"
VIP LEACH + r Equipment base flexible: Q Yes Q. No 7 43 Lw~<w-u Date: 3- <" ons c 1on re Reviewed by: Date: Ops'Qy Qns ruc xon c or evzew ov hy'. ngxneer Verified by: ua. e npsec or Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
S 8 A CEPARTMENT CONTROL.LEO DOCUMc 8'l 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COPY NO. Ul',TRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: > If( REPORT DATE: > '+ lZ REQUEST NO. l IA. IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit C hlE Test Unit/ S/N Component l AC.l F Freq./Diameter 6 Item Reference Standard C. Ke
'3e Material Couplant/Batch No. i~ cMA 6t= o".
Other TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: I EVEI: ~ DATE: REVIEWED BY: FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 E.EVEL: ~ Page 1 of DATE: 1 5 Revision 0
0 01/16/92 PG. MO.SC5 SAFE SHUTOOMM EOUIPHENT LIST (SSELMP) FUNCTION: Equipment Class: 21 I'rain: 2 Equipment IO: 1-HE-3C-HE Drawing Number: 1-5135A Svstem: CCM Equip
Description:
NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP.26N OUTBOARD MECHANICAL SEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: NORTH SAFETY INJEC'IIOH PUMP ROOII Elevation: 587 Normal State: Desired state: iPower Required: M Sort: lf, Suoonrting System Drawing Humber: omvired Interconnections and Supporting Components: fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AIIas Number: Power Train: MA Cnmonnent Served: NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP 26N wanufacturert BORG. MARNER Kodeit NX 0500-FM Panel EC~ Drawing: H/A Miring Drawing: N/A Pnwer Source: N/A Mal%down: F Relay Only: M Comoonent I'ype: HE ~ ISO Drawings: Detailed Location:
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 1-HE-34-NE (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD MECHANICALSEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: N SAFETY INJECTION PUMP RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BORG-WARNER, NX-0500-FW BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the. anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A S S C
~co vins SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/1/93. ANCHORAGE ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEERING JUDGMENT OF THE SRT. 6" diameter by 8-3/4" high exchanger, attached to North Safety Injection Pump with 2 1/2" bolts. Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed seperately on the SSEL. Crane above in a parked and locked position. Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) ~ Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 1-HE-34-NE (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N INBOARD MECHANICALSEAL HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: N SAFETY INJECTION Pt MP RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BORG-WARNER, NX-0500-FW NORTH SAFETY INJECTION PUMP PP-26N
~~xc vnr ~vs~ iiu. via ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET A. 5a4z h~ e~ ', 9 Rn Un1t g Bldg. Locat1on C
Installat1on dwg. / Rev. Equ1pment No. Anchora e Arran ement, Sketch F46'v. J>I=4 45DksQl c yj'4 Ooi~ Yyp Vlc o.O. Oo I
~l FLo 'E4.
INDiAHA." llCHIGA"I POY(ER '-0 CONSTRLICT!Oib CGLTROLLEO
~ T, EYORKING COPY 4 Gr a ' i q
S~P g g tqap CLERK k 7 Drawn by: Date: /8-/- Verified by: Date: L- Z.- 'P < Qual. /Cert. Inspector ,:I Reviewed by: Date: nstruct1on Anchor Rev1ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
Equipment No.: Tightness established by "Snug Fit" Tightness veri'ed by: 'C. goal./Cert. Inspector Tightness Verified by: onstruction ARE Comments:
Equip ID: 1-TK-11 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 1-5142 ction: RI ys tern: BORON INJECTION Equip Desc: BORON INJECTION TANK Building: AUXILXARY Room: BORON INJECTION TANK ROOM Elev: 612 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: Comp Served: BORON INJECTION TANK Mfr: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. Model: 900 GALS, O'I '. Elem. Drawing: 1-98282 Wiring Drawing: 1-95222 Power Source: '1-AM-D-5A 1-AM-A-2A Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK a ISO Drawing: Location: XN THE MIDDLE OF ROOM, 15'W OF THE ROOM'S ENTiVQICE DOORWAY.
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 3 ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
BORON INJECTION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORON INJECTION TANK RM, IN THE MIDDLE OF RM, 15'WOF THE RM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY. Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS, 4'l BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A SMC
~CO ~~S SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93. ADEQUACYOF ANCHORAGE AND TANK TO SUPPORT CONNECTION BASED ON JUDGMENT BY THE SRT AND COMPARISON TO THE BORIC ACID TANK EVALUATION. Tank is 5'iameter by 10'n height supported by 4 Wide Flange Leg supports (10" WF w/5/8" flange) 4'R" in height.. Each leg is bolted to the pedestal w/ two embedded 1 3/4" bolts with 2'-11" embedment Weld of leg to tank about 14" in length and 1/4" thickness on each side of the wide flange and 10" at the top of the wide flange. Adjacent Block wall reinforced with column supports and it is not an interaction concern. The Seismic Evaluation of the Boric Acid Tank (2-TK-12S) is seismically adequate. The Boron Injection Tank (1-TK-11) is much smaller but has about th. same support. Therefore, Tank 1-TK-11 is judged adequate.
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== BORON INJECTION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORON INJECTION TANK RM, IN THE MIDDLE OF RM, 15'WOF THE RM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY. Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS. 4'l Evaluated by: Date:
- fs.
Attachment:
Pictures
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-TK-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== BORON INJECTION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 612.00 Room, Row/Col: BORON INJECTION TANK RM, IN THE MIDDLE OF RM, 15'W OF THE RM'S ENTRANCE DOORWAY. Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: STRUTHERS-WELL-CORP. 900 GALS, 4'l ELILlEH BASE ANCHORAGE PEDESTAL SUPPORT COLUMN TO TANK CONNECTION
Coo Component No. ~ TK. <laic Ql payticulir area the Seismic Revue~ Teaa should pay extra attention to? Any Yes ~ No (If yea, check items that apply.) Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment < Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe briefly) If there ts concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.
- l. Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Drawing Up&,te Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy 4(,. Others Condition:
Actions Taken: Prepared By D444
0 L2 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHM.NT NO. 1 AQ'L ~~I'-0" Cl BORON'MKCTIOM tAMI( t=.I GM Un t Bldg. Location I2- 3514.-17 I - T>C. -Il O Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment NO. Ycxwk, Loc. =+i@~ +aK<Ir Anchora e Arran ement Sketch Pro~ Dwg. (0-33] "t-l7 E I" x I5"X l5" W IO>> 4.5 o I ~1~'+ AMOS HQLY'5 PEP DRAINlklC
) Q.357')-20 O.
6J Qc 40 Qg INOI.-'sic. r'.I.,r< ".
~
SITE 0::SIGN COr WORKING CGc ~ JUL lg tSS5 LERK Drawn by: Verified, by: ~ Date: Qua . Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: = 4, Date: Construct on c or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
.2 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 AUX. (oQ'-0" EL. BQROQ M,K,CT'lQKL TAMK PQQM Un t Bldg. Location I- TK-)i Installation dwg. / Rev. Equxpment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
)8 I NOIANA MICKIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY ELK.V. LKC. UHH lUt. 1)1995 LERK~
Drawn by: Date: Verified by: Date: Qua . Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: Date: 3 Construction An or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~~~ 4 4 vo 4 gag ~ t/i y)
ATTACHMENT No. quipment No, I- Vl(-iL No i ~pe. c i-.Yaw<
~ ~g No.: /o Pj ~J I ~
Anchor type: >~+ ~"P~ ~ I~~ Dia: I ++ Dwg No.: )Q %~7+ Tightnass cata isnas hy: FJ "snug Fit" 0 Torque g Torque Wrench No.: hlh Cal. Due Date:
'j - Tightness verified'? 0 Yes 0 No Date:
+Q ons ruc ron q Equipment base flexible7 D Yes I No
' <">l ons ruc xo ARE Date:
Bolt ID '/tie" A '13K COIIIments I A s //' w'// v4 Anchor 1eb' len h Z'-II" @ 0 ~ '- II
" ~ g 2'-I Protruding p~~T~o FE.CE~ ~a RGCLGSE.O ga P.ECESXQ Ih <ITT I HICK Ill
~v len th < ~/
.,
4 p/+>> )/In ~>
+ @
I ICD Embedment 2-6'/s" 2'-5'e Bolt '4" ri Z."~<~" 2 '~o" 6 2'/e" E>4"
'""'te condition CO~Cea iS CeC~
V<t." GPGUY PER CPAV{LLLCs IL BELD-LCa Edge 4/A N/A M /'A IM/4, 4/A 4/0, hL/0, g/A &z)g< distance TIS IQ Q.m Anchor 6'/z" 8'/z" 8" B" 8" 5" 8" s acin Atu QIOR Anchor U/4 4/A an larit N 4/4 4/A kVA
>/S '
U JA I+" kl /A IJ/A
~/~- &Hi u~TW our mi~~a-.
( Thread "
~ecE~ t-I< RE~a RccEss 0 i4 P,G Ess DK. H IC engagement Comments, + UA'TA, 'QoT QwtlkiEQ DUE 'To 7 AYLQM.
INA UUOKTALNA LIE TCi T P, Verified by- Date: -> 3 gua ,//Cert inspector Ravieved by: Construct on ARE INDIANA LIIGHT'..: SITE OESIGN CONTRC~ 0 WORKING COPY Pago 2 of 3 Revision 1 LERK 9 '~ I
'A DEPAR'FMENT 2 SHP 5050 NDE.008 S '8 ATTACP2KNT NO. 1 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO. 'P -l ULTRASONiC TEST REPORT C
A'/Tg REQUEST NO. JA gy IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE
-'tl Unit +e Test Unit/ S/NL(.i -'/'S Cz c "RQS Component: - 7 f -// Freq./Diameter Item n/ A/'/-- Reference Standard Naterial ~/ Couplant/Batch No.
Other C) TEST DATA RENARKS A /T c'L C PERFORMED BY: LEVEL~ DATE: 3 23 ~13 REVIEWED BY:" LEVEL:~ DATE: Y ZS FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip ID: 1-TK-37 Train: 12 Equip Class:21 Drawing No.: 1-S13SA ction:
~ ~ CCW System: CCW Equip Desc: COMPONENT COOIING WATER SURGE TANK ggc Building: AUXILIARY Room:~ HALLWAY $ 5o Elev: %69- Sort: S, Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: CONDENSATE COOLING TANK MFR: SPEAR AND WOOD Y"Gel: 10000GAL, 2' x 12' 'lem. Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK (COMMON DIVIDED BY BAFFLE} Iso Drawing: Location:
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of5 ID: 1-TK-37 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SPEAR AND WOOD, 10000GAL, 2' x 12' BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring- pe foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A SRT: Gary Thomas and Tom Huang on 11/3/93.
Skirted tank 11'-10 1/4" diameter and 17'n height. Skirt is 4'4" high from the top of the pad to skirt connection to tank. Skirt has 1/2" thickness. There are 8 bolts evenly spaced around tank, with a solid steel washer 3-3/4" high x 4" length x 2" width. Bolts supported from 3" x 3" x 1/2" angle. Crane above tank has been evaluated by AEPSC for seismic loads. The results gave a safety factor of 1.06 for the anchor bolts using the GIP penalty for J-bolt embedment. A hand calculation that included in the package was performed for the bolt stresses. Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
External Anchorage Analysis for 1-rK-37
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet2of5 ID: 1-TK-37 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== COMPONENT COOLING WATER SURGE TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: SPEAR AND WOOD, 10000GAL, 2' x 12' BOLT TO TANK DETAIL
CUENT <<Iota S'+t-I "" attar ~ or~ Stevenson and Assodates 8 A Structural Meelto atcol Coo<atria<5 Eat<to<<a<toy Fr<ra D 5
~ ~
5P fA
~ ~
6 >> Cl th
<It >> tu l.'. 45 i hf ti I I 'L ~ I hr gl Pg ~ -<o>> ( <<o ~ 'I I, A,S>> \
I '<<rtr
~ .
tht I h>>ft <; >> tth. l
<<'l' * '
( tl 551<>>>> I ~ '<
~
I 5 of I (~f ~ ~
\ ~ I >>5 I p. <<, ~ ., yh(l If. ~ \~
11 lh l r ~ tt 55>'5 t,:.It} 5 O ro
>> Cf Pl>>h I ftjj I
I<<L pt 'p tr tt I trrlh u (
>>r l>>g I~ >> I ~ t ~ r .Il 5 I
CIJENT
~ ~s'1 P w w Cg<<I Ccs 4(S Sl. 8 "" L I ., '7 M stru. ~.~ uI <, I(J>1.c 7E ~ I SUBJECT A Ic- [ << ~g ~5 7 Stevenson and Assodates A S(ruccurc!.MccIsr aces l Coarul((s(r Ea(r(act((ay E(rsi gc '?N.
is>>I 4.," . ~, 4 E~E. I<<II)I IEII,(
'I ~ ~
u ~ 1
'
ilr 7 r(c
~ II r? h.
8'ci 1
- Il .CI V
'I ~ I Qlr ~
5 ~1 1.'cc 4
~ >> 1 ~
1 I cgt ~ I>> cl ~roc 2?P 41\5,
)i% tl7 (l>>P V p7 -,c; r(lr>>;~
l,F
- re>> t (1; I.I ' ir 5 4
4
~
lrr, ~
'114 "C ~
c>>I x 7 fine I O'<<
'>>I' ?u ~ C 114 QI \ ~
qg.c ir PL ?cl 7(
. '5 Itrr ~ ir rI ~C E ~ l C'I CI >>4 1 '4'i. 7( 4 44 >>>> kt' ~ I ~ t rli I I 1 I>>7 S"Cj 4'PW I'ic C("'"' I t<<lv, 'r<<r,. <<(7s, Ttt(I :Lt ~I".1 ()r ~ CI c ~
lr>>E I 5>>r E
~ 4 r'
4 CuEHT Y) 9 ~' " SHEET OF g@~ C ~~~ ~~ a V ~ c.ter- 4-IJt r.Z>> F 7 ht tc, ( h'r Steve@son and Assodatcs
*Stractara)-Mac)raalcal 0 Coarldttay Ka2ltaccrlatr Ftral 44 (2
2 7. '2 4"4'fcr.gf
,44 44144 rr ~ 2 I ll I ~
F Jt
".4. '2 ' 'r Jtt 4" V r-'29'vY t ~
i g 2 'tFI't 4)
~ ~4 YYt 'I I ~ \
4 1 ~ Fr 'I g
~ ' ' 1' .~> r.
Vr x 2FI' - 41. 241 h ~
~ 44, Y 'Yr
- rl fI\IF )f.
Pl I;"2 ) 4Y 22Y2", I.f ~ .g;\s Yl 2 Ih ~ .C 44 222
~ ' '1 Y'4 h'F.y I
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt " Bldg. Location /2-3 Z7 Y(-
Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
'w MG ORNA POWER INDIANAMICHIGAN CONTROLLEO CONST RU TION w RKIHG COPY a 3 ~992 << ~L 4-o Drawn by. Date:
Verified by Date: Q al./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: S nstructzon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021 CCD O19 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECT10N DATA SHEET Unxt g Bldg. Locate.on Q-3 Installation dwg. / Rev. Ecpxzpment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INDIANAMICHIGAN POWER CONSTRUCTION CONTROLLED 8/y WORKING COPY AUG 1 > 1992 CLERK .> +~~
.:c q'.e "a
Drawn by: Date: -I- l Verified by: Date: QG ./Cert. Inspector P Reviewed by: Date: nstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
0
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 r
ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt g Bldg. Location Installatz.on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 1- -3 (gp($ +4 <4(QH>GAB POWER QON$ TQQCv n~ GONTSOLLEO wOR ~. 'Ci CC('Y azw
~ p~l ~b c<
(omnlsonS Votv SrC r~a~ +i~> Fl 6 Leo + H>> + 4r 3+ oP)s c//< Ãs B% 3'ls Drawn by: Date: Verified by: Date: Q l./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ l s ,;~/ N ~ fi ~
~ W~sRM~RHR%
MMIIIIIII II585mmlmmm a ~ ~ a RSIIIRIMIIIII s ~ RSIIISIIIRSRRIIII
- 55. Iles% .. l%I%
IIIIIISIIIHII a Rse&R4%Ã%RM~RJ%8%5% MWWMWMW& ~ La I Sl ~ ~i L ~ L ~ (
~~asia L
~~K9MEX >
~
I ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ if ~ ~ ~
Equipment No.: I .! - established by "Snug
~'ightness Fit" Tightness veri fied by: Qual. /Cert. Xnspector Comments:
Equip XD: 12-TK-47-AB Train: 1 Equip Clays,:21 wing No.: 2-5151C tion: EMERG DIESEL System: DIESEL FUEL OXL Equip Desc: AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK (BURIED IN THE YARD) Building: GROUNDS Room: INNER PLANT GROUNDS Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status:.NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: AB FUEL OXL STORAGE TANK MFR: 60,000 GALS (12'IA X 72'ONG) 'Panel: Elem'. Drawing: NgA Hiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK (COMMON FOR UNIT 1 AND UNIT 2) 240 HRS FULL LOAD. Xso Drawing: 7 Location: BEXNG REPLACED UNDER RFC 12-4113,, CI NOT APPROVED AS OF 9-15-92.
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 11 ID: 12-TK47-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT GROUNDS UNIT 0 2 BURIED SOUTH OF TURBINE BUILDING Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 12'IA X 69'-10"LONG, 60000 GALS BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
-2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, N/A vertical tank..
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A mQKS SRT: George G. Thomas (SBA) and Tom Huang (AEP)
'C Underground tank. SRT evaiuated this tank based on the ave~~able documentation in the equipment package.
A tank calculation was performed (included in the tank package) based on the reference drawings The tank was modeled as a beam on elastic foundation. The overall tank stresses were very low (on the order of 3.6 ksi). Evaluated by: Date:
~g i-) il /Z ~low"
Attachment:
EVALUATIONOF STRESSES IN THE TANK
CUENT
- a4CttO g 5~
Stcvcnson and Assodatcs A Structural Maclen aleut EI Conautttatr Kntrtncartng Ftrra > cn tn-OSC
CLlEHT SUMECT Stevenson and Associates A scuctvcal Mechanical El coasulctsy Elplaoocno f4'
CUENT Stcvcnson and Associates k A Stsucturel-M eAe nlesl Coaoultlaa Koalnooriay Fina . C. ~ Ca~ 4
CUENT Stevenson and Assodates A StnsctvcehMocha alcal R Coaaoltlay Eagtoeeaay Fina De +e C-WO W
CUENT Stevenson and Assodates h st(udvrasMecha aleaf Coawltlay Knylnoodng fire
g CUENT 5 ~ 4, No~ o z0 8 Stevenson and Assodates Pu Il A Structursl-Mschs nicsl Consulting Engtn<<ring Sirrn
'3 1 lOc 3%
c
CUENT 4 Stevenson end Assodatcs l5 A Srrucrural.Mcchaalcal Caarulung Kaalaccriny flrra Pr Cr 8 WOCr
CUENT I 2. Stevenson and Associates II h StructurohM echo uk Cuaoulttau Kactaoortatr ol f ra to S (
0 CUENT Stevenson and Assodates 8 A SICIICIVC1I.MWL4OIC4I Coaoul5sy Kaylneorlng Feaa D. a ggg
V i'
CUENT SVMEGT Stcvcnson and hssodatcs 8 A Svuctural.Mechanical Coaaultiog K~laoeclny Eitoa Y-t A.
Equip ID: 2-HE-11 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 2-5129A
~
2-5135 ction: RI
~ ~
System: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER INZ/LEAKOFF Equip Desc: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: REACTOR COOLANT PUMP Mfr: ATLAS INDUSTRIAL MANUFACTURING CO. Blem. Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Bval : N Comp Type: HEAT EXCHANGER ISO Drawing: 2-CS-91 2-CS-100 Location: IN WEST AREA OF ROOM
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 7 ID: 2-HE-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SEAL WTR HEAT XCHGR RM - IN WEST AREA OF ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRIALMANUFACTURINGCO. BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A S U
~CVIF~S SRT: Gary Thomas and Tom Huang on 11/3/93. Vertical Heat Exchanger on a Gusseted steel pedestal. Each Pedestal is anchored to the floor with 8- 3/4" J-Bolts embedded 20" into floor. Exchanger is 16" in diameter and 14'n height. Exchanger is bolted to the steel pedestal with,2 1" diameter steel bolts on 6" centers in weak direction and 2'-8" in strong direction. This connection is more limiting than the anchorage to the floor. Attached calculation was to judge adequacy of these for bolts. The exchanger has a frequency of 10.6 Hz and the bolts had a safety factor in tension of 3.54. Evaluated by: Date: IC) /4
~g~ CZ
Attachment:
Pictures ttachment: Verification of Bolt Connection
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 7 ID: 2-HE-11 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== REACTOR COOLANT PUMP SEAL WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SEAL WTR HEAT XCHGR RM - IN WEST AREA OF ROOM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRIALMANUFACTURINGCO. ECUlKR SUPPORT PEDESTAL TOP OF THE EXCHANGER
CUENT SUBJECT t'()Ne. Q CaO<~ Stevenson and Assodates A Sllvclvlal-MCCIIIalcol S Coalvlgag Saglaotllag Fitch Ahchol' ~ Acca oaohC Slcatch Ioalcro Vatlaco tacofa SllC DYSICN CDNYIDSIIO 2-HHI clalclha cotY Sfp lS 1SSS I~ I ~ I( h'YI'nt> lS fC(WF) NYCT
~, ,~
Cl ') eIC.S ~ yl qvr)
"..'LEV l K(o C)SST ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ I~ ~ I ~
I ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r er'
' ~ ~ ~ ' ~ ~ h ' ~r ~ ;I@aha li cac 0 ~ aa Iaa S.
rt'acatl4c ~ \hr 5't,o IODIINC IVQOCAN YOOC
~ cl 5 Dcslca cahl caslto g.)i voc claa can SSP lS lSSS r ~ r SIC ~
lA IB 'oh 0 0 tC p 0 g IYCSO IAI L~FA) AD CI
<<CIO II3 (rlrg. -,'t c 0 0 e
0 II 0 IC
- o. ~
+Ps YcltaJ IICCDI13 (YYY ) 0 0 0 0 IYCSO'Wt 'I Yah CI (tel Y3) F >3 e(FID) IC ' ~ I ~ ICSDWI ~ rL ~
lg 0 0 C,caclr 0 0 C I\ T.
~E I. "~ L ,Ql 'Ã)' ~
I cocah T eotT trit) C sell:'rc I 01hhc
<<lc Dl gas cocca cac IDLsco aacclha catt Sf P' S SSSS I,
3ECY.'t\3 ccc(cccl c-c N occuv) c 'S tr acscT
". )pP (>>
C
CUEHF QJBJECT Stevenson and Assodatcs 8 A Structural-Mectfaalcal Coaru! o oft Eatftocurtafr Fifa< P P.
~ i'I, h ,f ~
P.'
~ cK g"I <<<><YA ~ iver gv vruhu '. 'P<% .fc\u <K ~ )
I t>> f<<~lg 'tfr lg<<>>u tlap
'P vh ~, '<< r'pi r
P.. t,'hr >
>> I P
- f. ~ I ~
>>~ u p ~ / Pf>> ~ <<
pfr h htrfu P
<< ~ h I l'I '
r< f '<< hFrutarp P.. gh' up ~ ru ~ qtr ~ >>Irph I I I'P H r'tfu Ip. toKj .ifu P ~ I * ~ h
r, CUENT JOB No. SUBJECT ~@Awe EW Stevenson and Assoctntes A St( ucfuf al.Macha afccl IR.Cuafulffaff Raff face(Lay Sic(a
~
4 1 ~ l crap l>> Q,:If
-'5 PP ~
tf "r,( 1~ I Jul gl>> u4 I P
<<P Irp rir I~ 1 ~
(~ 44
/<<<<
4
~ 'g <<ls ~ I +
1,14 'la>> ru n.
\'..
IP 'f I'<<
~ >>J "f ~ 'I Sir! I I'-p~ 'I .4 "4,')!e/
Off P .' CP
'"'5 >>l II I,I(lr<<"<< <<'+rrf>>V I
rp
~ <<1 lI ~
14.C'
<< ~ 1,1 P << %14 ruI II uf PPP '
I 'I /
'1 1(Q ~ rpl (l<<>>I'l(' '1 >>t 0(fg ff
CUENT JOB No. ~ 'HEET OF Stevenson and Assodatcs 5 A Structural.l4ucha attut Coaruttiag Kagtauurtag Firar L.
~ r ~ r,
Coo Componone yo, 2 Class l Any paxpicular area the Seismic Review Teaa should pay extra attention tot Yes < No (Xf yea, check items that apply.) Anchor Typo Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embodmont<
~qs ~ ~~T Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap gjO I/ E; Q Pl I IJ (. ) <Al(= (g E'L Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Other'a (describe bri.oily)
TE there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, cir'clo the applicable item and explain.
- 1. Hardware Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. l'raving Upd?te Typo Discrepancy
- 3. Signil.'icant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:
Actions Taken: Prepared By
**12 CHP 5021.CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEE SBfn DATER I+&AT AX M @Oq -01'AC,HAhl4BR .
g.oug Bldg. Location 2..~-I t Installation dwg. / Rev. Ectuzpment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INDIANA I IICMIGAN POWCR SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEO 2-HG "I I WORKING COPY SEP t)1995 g ~ I ( l<YPg
~i1 R(7<~)
I/Z,R.(~p) ~Ag
~b< ~0 \ ~ h~ <~b PLED. gK.G C A&T Drawn by: Date:
.Verified by: Date:
~ ual./Cer . Inspector Reviewed by: T Construe Date:
won An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECT ON DATA SH E Unxt l2- 3z Xnstallatxon dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch (>yp) IVB & (T9P) I
,'A 0 0 P
I 0 0 ~4 0 0 I 0 0
>/g Z(~p) 0 0 C AFOOT 0 0 8 Pee .
I-O'RP I IOIAPIA iVICHIGAN POPOVER SITE OESIGN CONTROlLED YPORKIHG COPY SEP t~1995
.LFRKT Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date: al. Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: Date: Construction Anch r Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CHOR INSPECTION DAT S A"SX ~ gPa'-O" S~ %PITCH &BR'T BXCHfHI GBR. RooH Unit Bldg. Location l 2- 525s H~ -1(
Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INDIANA I.IICHIGAN PO'ilE'R SITE DLSIGN COMTROLLiD WORKING COPY SF.P 13 ISSUE LERK W~Hb w~ wB ('TYPE) 3/( y WMAj ~/II (~P'L) /I g HMH$
~P2.) ~I(
wm wl
.bi, e'$ ~ ~ 'ob'4'ga J BoiT
(~P) 5CCT, Z -8 (scca c;c ~<<~+~~) Drawn by: Date: ~ 1 Verified by:
~ ~
Date: -F-F ual Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T Date: Construe won chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
ATTACHMENT NO ~ 1 ANC OR SP Equipment Dwg No.: Steel No.-'mbedded Dwg. No.: I YS CA CHARA IS C Weld ID Weld e Codes T e Size '/ ~II I >/II 3li t 1 = Fillet
= Plug/Slot Len th 2I/ l II/ %4" <4'8I/ 2 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes s Yes Yes Yes o No No Lack of ~e es Yes es QeQs Yes Yes Penetration No No No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes'es Yes No Yes No INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY SEP tg t995 LERK Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 5-No ons ruc z n e Date:
Reviewed'y: Date: t l2 3 ons ruc won c or evzev ngxneer Verified by: a .. V e . npsec or Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision
*~12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 Equipment No.: Dwg No.: l2-32 Anchor type: GODET Dia: pwg No ~: I2 - '32 8$
Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: Cal. Due Date: Tightness verified? 0 Yes No Date: 1 ons c 10 Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes C(No ~. Date: 0 1-13 ons uc 1 n ARE C C Bolt ID A 5 C O e. F c Comments Gaps c l$$ aeT $ Hpv I/S~"em gpss Yg>'ST 0 Anchor len th
\
2.- 0 It I 2,- 0
" 'I Z-o V <
2.- o ii 2-i o il c g-0
<<
2oI II 2-0 f~ IYI QCfCj I 2.-3vlgG Protruding p I5/l~ g" p'I ~ '>/~ ~"/g Z~Jy edment )I )I//)~i iI qu 1< qu lI-1" li q'i~I 1 qy8 ) q Bolt ri Concrete condition Edge distance g ( 2. /IX P I 2." > I W ) I> W t 2. 0 I 2. 7i2-Anchor @II @tl @'II @II 4 s acin ( u Anchor 4 Oo i~o 00 g0 an larit ~ OO O4 () 0 Thread oy 0y ng oK. ot. ck ok o(( engagement Comments: Verified by: Date: r9 a ., ert. Inspector Revieved by: Date: Construct on ARE SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WOIIKING COPY SEP l~ 1995 ago2of 3 LEIIK ovision -3
r4
~ I e ~ ~ ' ~ ~ e ~ ~ e ~ ~ k ~ ~
~ ~ I
- ~ ~ 4' ~ / I e 14
~ ~ II I - d e elec W
.R Lk '
IIIIIIIIHI o
. -
mmmmiimmmi mmmIIRlmmmm RRIIIRI mm58 ~ ~ ~ o p o
~ - =
ISRIIRHIIIIIIR5lRR
~
REMIIMMIT& i g $ J I' ]' WW%% 0 ) J
~ .
0
12 SHP 5050 NDE.008 S 8 A DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTROLLEO DOCUMENT COPY NO. ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: CQ 4, REPORT DATE: REQUEST NO. M A, IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit 'l
~CD Test Unit/ S/
Component 2 -ll Frey./Diameter Item Reference Standard Material +S Couplant/Batch No. C < Other TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: REUIEWED BY: LEVEL: M~ DATE: / 5 FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Emlip ID: 2-HE-38E Train: 2 J Equip Class:21 wing No.: 2-5135A ction: CCW System: MISCELLANEOUS SEALING AND COOLXNG Equip Ddsc: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER Building: AUXILIARY Room: EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: EAST CENTRXFUGAL CHARGING PUMP MFR: AMERXCAN PRECISION INDUSTRIES (BASCO) M Pa l Elem. Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: HE Iso Drawing: 2-CCÃ-515, 2-CCW-508 Location: XN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OF EAST CENTRXFUGAL CHARGING PUMP g2-PP-50E
DC COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUAPION WORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 2-HE-38E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: E CENTRIFUGAL CHARG PMP ROOM -'IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OF EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP ¹2-PP-50E Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MIDLAND-ROSS/ROSS-OPERATING VALVECO. BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A C Y D SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93.
ANCHORAGE TO PUMP ACCEPTABLE BY ENGINEERING JUDGMENT OF THE SRT Small exchanger 1'W" long and 5" in diameter bolted to 2 1'ong channel columns that are welded to the skid of the East Centrifugal Charging Pump. Could have screened with the pump using the rule of the box, however the exchanger was listed seperately on the SSEL. Crane above in a parked and locked position. Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
DG COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet2of2 ID: 2-HE-38E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: E CENTRIFUGAL CHARG PMP ROOM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 2 FEET NORTHEAST OF EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP ¹2-PP-50E Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MIDLAND-ROSS/ROSS-OPERATING VALVECO. EAST CENTRIFUGAL CHARGING PUMP PP-50E LUBE OIL COOLER
**12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET hu -&. g Un1t Location z'-o'ldg.
NA '2-H-E-5 6 Installation dwg. / Rev. Ecgxzpment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INDIANA MICHIGAN PPW'Fg SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 25 t985 LEgK T'(eek>~ O'- III "
~~~ 7O QCIC E, g,g<, wssT Drawn by- Date:
Verified by: goal.] ert. Inspector 6 a-pa Reviewed by: Constructxon nchor Review Engineer Dt: Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ~X-BL ~gT c.CHTRi~h~ C.~)gg 5'5 t-0 Puca A.o~e Unct g Bldg. Location Mh a-~-BEE Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INOIAtEA PiCHIGAW "OWER SITE OESICh CON~RGu.EO AORKltIQ COPT AUG 25 1885 I.ERi< 7 y+'~ PPI T, CJ~~
~qq~si~ e u) ~T~P) ~l I
ookiQt ORTH Drawn by- ~/ ~la,~ D t Verified by'- Date: ual./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T Date: Construct@on An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
Equip ID: 2-QT-134-CD Train: 2 Equip Class:21 D awing No.: 2-5151D tion: EDG System: DIESEL JACKET WATER Equip Desc: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Room: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: B Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: Y Support System Drawing: 2-12030 2-98014 Req'd Support Comp: 2-ABD-C-1D Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: A Comp Served: CD AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER MFR: INDEECO 75KW HEATER Panel: 2-DGCD Elem. Drawing: 2-98014 Wiring Drawing: 2-95302 Power Source: 2-ABD-C-1D Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK Iso Drawing: Location: IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP g2-QT-130-CD2,
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP 82-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring- pe foundation is not used to support a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A DE SRT: W. Djordjevic and TR Satyan Sharma. 10/6/93.
REF: 1. Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certified 8/31/93.
- 2. Dwg 0 12-3468-13.
- 3. Worthington Corp. Dwg. SK7938, 8-23-74 Anchorage: 2-QT-134-CD is the J.W. Heater, separately mounted by three1/2" coupling configuration of rod and Phillips Redhead wedge type anchors. Tightness was verified by torque, 6/28/93.
For anchorage evaluation, see External ANCHOR analysis, File: 2QT134CD.ANC. Weight of full water tank is estimated as 550 Ib (assumed with 12.75" OD, .375" Wall thickness, flat.375" thick end plates, 64" height, and 4.18 cu. ft volume of water). Considered as a cantilever with distributed load, the fundamental frequency is estimated to be 82.5 Hz. Actual response is governed by fixity of the base; anchorage system consists of three 5/16" x 2" x 6.25" plates welded to the bottom of the tank at 120 degree intervals. Considering the base flexibility and configuration, the frequency was estimated to be 8.96 Hz. as indicated on the attached calculation. The ANCHOR analysis intlicates a factor of safety of 3.74, however, the capacity of the anchorage is controlled by the base plates with a factor of safety of 1.84 as shown in the attached calculation.
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2114I92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS} Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP 42-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Evaluated by: Date'.
/ L/i 3 ~/~g
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
Anchor Plate Seismic Capacity Evaluation for 2-QT-l34-CD
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS'j Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUX!LIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP
¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER 2-QT-134-CD
CUFNT SUBJECT Stovenson and Assodatcs 8 A S!rucru ral. Mocha a!col Coaoulaa4 KOO!aoorlaO Flrra ch ttt cA 'P
~
IOO
>>I ~ I I gcggg~ E//z$guG-s~t,+~447rdP'p4/g, 0 8g+ ~p//8 &gdVf 8&.ChF gh'E- .~CU~ge~ ~Eg ti/VSr d~ ~~/GALS. (7-". zw.l~S) Q-//di~ gg 444'/0 ~i gh~ APOXg'rdn44 Q FC707 5 '?h"4'.e i'~Sf l
5 I i 8
$ 0' zo,
I.'r)
!.
III I ~~
~~ ~ I DzR O ~ .
I ~
- I ~
iI ICg+
>>
I l5 Zrv/. rt )%hi
/j t.tt kj.
h roll 04f8 Igd 095
.AMERlCAN ELECTRiC POWER ) 'r It'!ho .,'@RVICE CORPORATiON )gf'APPtHOVEO (N GENERAL "8- ~IOVED EXCEPT AS NOTED .p4 'U:.NOT APPROVED c. ubr I
0:~ MFEREN E ONLY or>>or Ioor uott IOIIC Iorouorltc OOI C I IIIIO ' c ' 'LI ' I' ' ~ L t.tent L 4 I i':. ~":5'l'Li
~
Y'),, I
~ I
CUEN~ P Stevenson and Assochtes 8 A Sttuctu tat.Mcchaatcal Coatutttay Eaglacortay Fttta z t ~ 4',r.)}
,1 ~ ~
c ~ ~ ul I %St . %)
~ i c
ag rt
~
i/ pcs ft u Mc
0 CUENT R~ IZI qs. 8 Stevenson and Assodatcs 5 A Sciacra ral44>eba alaal Caaralaay Karrlaeerlarr furr 1'1
~ r ~ h LA ~ 'I'v>>r>>4+ ~ >>I I LhU IC ~ 'I Ah ~ I~
A LV I A Il Al
.LC hl
- h. ~
S>>1 ~ gQ re<A g~'( ra VC 1 if'J 5~> li~~; av ~ b I
, rv ~
r>>>>'.IVI S ALII U ~ IP 1 I ~ h >>Il ol I~ Lr I Lhr .'I'Ij $ >
'I I a.l VI ~ '"i v4 11>I:m al >.
iri ag A IL, lh
~ QI ~ I >>C'I
( 'C S i ~ >> I .I).h
'
I ~ A' Il'
~ I A I
CUENT SHEET OF SVBJECT 2/0 9s
\
Stevenson and Associates A SvvctuwhMeehs nleel Coaeu!tlag Kagiaoeriaq face
CLiFNT Stevenson and Assodatcs 8 A Strttctttral Meeit4444eal COatultttty sag(4444tlttti fltat
+0'- 4 ~P ~
4 ~ 4, 4
'S at"I * .g! tQ;,<J S
- SS4 i I S p
+ ~ 4 St ~ S rs p 44 4
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 9 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP
¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER K Ij:tbaualx Spectrum: User 'esponse Frequency: User - 8.96 Percent Damping: User - 0.0G Spectral Values:
Direction Acceleration (g's) North - South 0.38 East - West 0.38 Vertical 0.23 Angle (N-S Direction makes with the X Axis): 0.00 Combination Criteria: SRSS ~Wight umber of Weights: 1 No Weight 1 550.00 6.875 0.000 32.000 Number of External Forces: 0 Xmas Number of External Moments: 0 gggygiJPp~ hachar Number of Anchor types: 1 Tension Shear Ultimate Ultimate Inter Inter Saf No Dia Manufact Product Tension Shear Coeff Coeff Fact 1/2 Phillips Wedge (N) 2290.00 2380.00 1.00 0.30 1.00 Qmmta Stress: 3500.00 psi..
'ltimate eduction Factor: 0.8 .
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/ti4/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 10 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEI'I RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP
¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Kaid 'llowable Stress: 30600 psi.
Rzfvm of Surfaces:
'umber 1
Surface Orientation Direction Direction Direction Comp Comp Comp No Nx Nz 0.000 0.000 1.000 Anchor Pattern for Surface ¹ 1 Legend for Anchor Patterns Anchor Bolts . Concrete Linen: ~mm Concrete Points . Vleld Lines:
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) 2/14/92'tatus: Yes Sheet 11 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CO EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP
¹2-QT-130-C02, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Qmmdn hrzhar.
Number of Anchors: 3 Anch Z Surf No Id Coord Coord Coord Id 0.000 0.000 0.000 14.063 -8.119 0.000 14.063 8.119 0.000 ¹ of elements per line: 1 Number of Concrete Lines: 3 Start Start End End End Sf Line No X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coord X-Coord Y-Coo rd Z-Coo rd Id Width
-1.000 0.000 0.000 6.250 0.000 , 0.000 1 2.000 11.438 -3.572 0.000 14.563 -8.985 0.000 1 2.000 11.438 3.572 0.000 14.563 8.985 0.000 1 2.000 Number of Concrete Points: 0 EcldJ.bm '
of elements per line: 4 Number of Weld Lines: 0 Reduction Factor input for Anchor ¹ 1 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: ( 2.13 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in. Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in. Edge Distance- Edge 1: 5.00in. Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes mbedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes
OC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 12 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP
¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹2 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: ( 2.13 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in.
Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in. Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in. Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factor Input for Anchor ¹3 Adequately Installed: Yes Embedment Length: (2.13 in. Min Reqd. to achieve full capacity):= 2.13 in. Gap at Threaded Anchor: 0.00 in. Edge Distance - Edge 1: 5.00 in. Crack Size: 0.000 in. - Cracks Affect <= 50% Bolts Essential Relays in Cabinet: No Adequate Equipment Base Strength and Structural Load Path: Yes Embedment Steel and Pads Adequately Installed: Yes Reduction Factors Data Current: Yes Anc PaIV Pallrl No Id Vali Vallr RT RN RL RG RS RE RF Rc RR RP RB RM 1 1 2003.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2380.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2 1 2003.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.M 1.M 0.88 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 2380.00 1.00 1.M 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 3 1 2003.75 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.M 1.00 1.M 1.M 1.00 2380.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 N/A = Not Applicable Pall = Allowable Pull without Reduced Inspection Vali = Allowable Shear without Reduced Inspection Pallr = Allowable Pull with Reduced Inspection Vailr = Allowable Shear with Reduced Inspection
= Outlier = Reduction Factor Not Used RT = Reduction Factor for Type of Anchorage = Reduction Factor for Installation Adequa RL = Reduction Factor for Embedment
0 DC Cook Unit GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) 2,~'CREENING Status: Yes Sheet 13 of 14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. G) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PLIMP
¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER RG = Reduction Factor for Gap at Anchors RS = Reduction Factor for Spacing = Reduction Factor for Edge Distance RF = Reduction Factor foi Concrete Strength RC = Reduction Factor for Concrete Cracks RR = Reduction Factor for Essential Relays RP = Reduction Factor for Base Stiffness and Prying Action RB = Reduction Factor for Base Strength and Load Path = Reduction Factor for Embed. Steel and Pads Analysis Performed: Yes Type of Analysis: Regular Spectral Accelerations (G's)
No N-S E-W Vertical Safety Factor 0.380 0.152 0.092 4.204
-0.380 -0.152 -0.092 4.704 -0.380 0.152 0.092 4.514 0.380 -0.152 -0.092 4.612 0.380 -0.152 0.092 4.204 -0.380 0.152 -0.092 4.704 0.380 0.152 -0.092 4.612 -0.380 -0.152 0.092 4.514 0.152 0.380 0.092 5.698 10 -0.152 -0.380 -0.092 3.039 0.152 -0.380 0.092 5.698 12 -0.152 0.380 -0.092 3.859 13 -0.152 0.380 0.092 3.740 14 0.152 -0.380 -0.092 6.064 0.152 0.380 -0.092 6.064 16 -0.152 -0.380 0.092 3.740 17 0.152 0.152 0.230 8.257 18 -0.152 -0.152 -0.230 7.950 19 0.152 0.152 -0.230 15.006 20 -0.152 -0.152 0.230 6.830 -0.152 0.152 0.230 6.830 22 0.152 -0.152 -0.230 15.006 23 0.152 -0.152 0.230 8.257 24 -0.152 0.152 -0.230 7.950
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet14 of14 ID: 2-QT-134-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Meat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERGENCY DIESEL AUXILIARYJACKET WATER HEATER (TANK) Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL GEN RM - IN THE NORTHEAST PART OF THE ROOM, 5 FEET NORTH OF CD EMERGENCY DIESEL JACKET WATER PUMP
¹2-QT-130-CD2, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 75KW HEATER Minimum Safety Factor: 3.740 The Anchorage Capacity is 3.740 times greater than the Demand
Coo ComponenC Po. '2" KT ) ~4'laia Any payticu1.ar area the Seismic Review Team should pay extra attention tot Yes V No (If yea, check itima that apply.) Anchor Type khumrJsa Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing eA-Anchor Number Anchor Embedmen Edge Distance
'nchor Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagements~
Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack& Others (describe bri.eely) IE there is concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle th>> applicable i.tom and explain.
- 1. Hardvc,re Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Drawing Update Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others P vV( c.8-o K Condition:
b> p, >F. +g0+R j~ a)c,(,~ <)~
) g->$ 4 Actions Taken:
prepared By T. Dat. 0 >> /~
'.2 CHP 5021 CCD.019 ~ ~TTACEQKNT NO. 1 OR'f TWQ Sa7-0" L ~P,qHEA,gg F )OQ OF ROC'OOM.
Un Bldg- Locat on (Z-34K- l3 2,-GT-isa- CD Znsta at on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch IIZ'a l30LT VllTH QVERSlZED WASHY.R 4 NUT )hl >s" 38(CK, K, NG'9 54QTTEQ HQLE, L'-0'ia" MO WAG%.R
+A QA INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 51 1S95 LERK ~ ~
Drawn by: Date: c Verified by: Date: - 0 Qu ./Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: Date: Construe on or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~
s ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ II
~ ~ ~ I ~ I ~ ' ~ 4 ~w~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
i I ~ r ~ ~ II 4 e 'L ~ + ~ i ~ ~ 'l ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
o li)
~ -. Ci ~ I l-s. L ~
RHMeWsaMMMWW HHHL%%%EE
-
ewmaaara .SL~LE55 858QERLl LE I I~ ~ ~ II r~ WlRISR%i EL
.-
l%RiR~HRLWLL MWWWWW~W& mmRIHRHLIL 5%l%SRHRRli% I I I
~ 0 RRiRgRkigi%~~~~~~ &WWWWK% ~ S ~
I ~ ~
~g IE ' > ~ l ~, ~ ' ~ '
5 <".~ A DEPT.Ri('v'.'=,". CONTROLLED DOCUMENT '2 SHP 5050 mE 008 COPY NO. ATTACPNENT NO. 3 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: /A Q ~) IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit Test Unit/ S/N y'S -'l~ CA.c'. -'s Component Freq. /Diameter Reference Standard Material V~ Couplant/Batch No. Other 5- . TEST DATA REMARKS
~ wl+%CC'.CS<<L cC+
PERFORMED BX: REVIEWED BY: LEVEL: LEVEL
~ ~-
DATE: DATE. FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip XD: 2-TK-76N Train: 2 Equip Class:21 P~awing No.: 2-5149
~ ~ ~
ction:
~
HVAC
~
System: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDXTXONING CHILL WATER Equip Desc: CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHXLL WATER EXPANSION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Room: CONTROL ROOM AXR CONDITIONER ROOM Elev: 650 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: Comp Served: MFR: Panel: Elem. Drawing: NOT APPL Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK. Iso Drawing: 2-VW-529 Location: 4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR
DC COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of2 ID: 2-TK-76N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: CTRL RM AIR CONDIT RM - 4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping'has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-botton Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A S C L DE
~C SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93. ANCHORAGE AND SUPPORT OF TANKACCEPTABLE BY JUDGMENT BY THE SRT FOR THIS SMALL TANK. Small tank 2'n length x 9 " in diameter on a 1" diameter piping system. Tank in-line with pipe, supported by a U-bolt on a cantelevered angle (2 1/2" x 2 1/2" x 3/8") about 1' 6" long. Angle welded to a plate that is bolted to the reinforced block wall with 3 5/8" diameter through bolts (other side of wall Inspecied and bolts came through). Glass site tube judged acceptable (no interactions). Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
DC COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 2-TK-76N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 650.00 Room, Row/Col: CTRL RM AIR CONDIT RM -4 FEET EAST OF THE ROOM'S ENTRANCE GATE, AT THE NORTH WALL, 7 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: QJCT~I=S CONTROL ROOM AIR CONDITIONING NORTH CHILL WATER EXPANSION TANK
Coo Component go, 2 TK 7~ ~ Class 2~ Any payticular area the Seismic Review Team should pay axtra attention to? Yes < No (If'es, check items that apply.) Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Ãumber Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Cap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Crip Anchor Angulari~ Concrete Crack< Others (describe brieily) If there is concern for Design Basi.s Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.
- l. Fardvare Naintenanc'a Type Discrepancy ruling Update Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Dosi~ Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:
WoH6 Actions Taken: Prepared B nasa
12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 0 - NSP CT 0 D T
%ÃTHWE,ST CORKP OF CbNTRQl. RIM AlR (.:I'"lT>gq s AU'L ( 50'- Q" . ROOM IC WAL 1"0" AEOVF FLQClr Unit Bldg. Location Z.- Tl(- IC 0 Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch R > g" x 4 "x I'-4" ZI r~r'.IO
~g e R{'.D 'ltllTll -{.UE<C i VUH'P.
I7A Wl 83+/ $ g4.'t&L
~QOCK %I&44 SEC TlQM "4-k" Z'6 I'r" Z" Z."
I Z >"x3"x ~ra" J Q LQ'iX 5'"+ CO ~/s"4 5%6-ROD o~ C.O>. 0)-'EB5llED -rL n-et; ~ Pp
+ amQ<S CRACWCD VC CBLIMG, %A'5'.5 UO O C9 ALSQ. MQPTAR BEl'WCCkl t" LQCI(5 O 2.'
Y. C RACK E.Q 4/l ~ ~O ZO& ~us Qy t. n 4LI SEC Y."2-K'ECT. 'Y -C" Drawn by: Date: C.-/ Verified by: Date: ual./ ert. Inspector
~ ~
Reviewed by:
~
Date: Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
ATTACHMENT Np. Equipment No.: Dwg No.: Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: Weld ID des size 1 ~ Fillet 2 ~ Plug/s3.ot Len h 3 ~ Groove cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Ho No No No No Lack of Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration No No No No No No No No Porosity Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes'es No Yes No Yes No , No (MGLC.N'ES YVC.LD I ~
~ kFQQMQ 'REM.
UMQCR<U'T AND FMDS OF AMC LE. H< '~e" I" QF 7Hz TOP HQR I "'TAL WELD I 5 CQ~~<~> WASHER lh3IA;IA h'ijcH(QQN T~o ~i~ c woaxi-G carr AUG 181995 LKRK T I Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc I.on e Date: Reviewed by: I ons ruc won c or evxew gxneer Verified by: ua npsec or Date: Pago 3 of 3 Revision 1
ATTACHMENT4 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR LARGE FLAT BOTTOM TANKS RAI ITEM 6
This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for the large fiat bottom tank evaluations requested in RAI Question 6. Included in this attachment are the evaluations for 1-TK-33 (RWST) and 2-TK-32 (CST).
wquip ID: 1-TK-33 Txain: 12 Equip Class: 21 Drawing No.: 1-5144
~ ~ ~ .'ction: DRI ~
System: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK SUPPLY Equip Desc: REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Room: RWST ARBA Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desixed State: Powex Req'd: Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLBAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: Comp Served: RWST Mfr: GRAVER TANK AND MAMJPACTURING CO Model: 420,000 GALS " Elem. Drawing: Wiring Drawing: Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Bval : N Comp Type: TANK ISO Drawing: Location: 25'ORTH OF UNIT 1 CONTAINMENT BUILDING.
>12 CHP 5021- CCD. 019 ATTACHE'.NT NO. l GA, ufo+ 25 HEPTA OI- Awrearr&T.
Un t Bl g. Local on i 3049 lc- 33 Insta at on wg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch RW.S T 7~k. DiN&NCioM '.$ DIRx 5'2'- '5 ttlAH 2'5 ~C.&R STR~ Q &@A~ ( SB& hJRcy pa.g9 aT~ gHC TH@ CT'%Re (S SoTTOM SW1 oF poP, PraOuHO Ttl@
~~
ncvWg<g p,~<<
- e. ~~w~ c~ ro4
/$ 4 ove 'e (e% ~t46- GF IS ~ >(g TA.imM)
CIaeug~ fH ~~~ WCP TeS I ~ NX,l-V~ T'tb Pagan array
. 'OOR. ~~q ~ll4) TO YQ '4~&/ $ 6 ~$ 6 AROOHO SNaoTH
( F R12T 0 QF F r~ T~ '2 Gtl>S ~ MO They nC'e'7~& <~aiI Faorn
<0 FtC.SCL)SV: To mZ ~Su~>oa),
INDIANA I/ICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY OCT kB tSSZ LERKT Drawn by: Date: IQ-1 t2 Verifiod by: D te: gga . Ce . Znspector Reviewed by: 2 Cons ruct on Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 oi' Revision .3
'(
I 0
> 12 CHP 502 1 CCD 019 ~ ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
'2S NOR t H OF NOTWWYYI~.T B g. Locat on 'l- TK.-33 Insta at on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch r= C+3uau
>/II"< is'w IP Ie< O u>q OMrI'S 'NIIYI~
hS Ceo~Q O TRt4K. I 3/br'" norns
,4 4 s 4
a4. ~ 4 ~
, 4 a INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLEIi WORKING COPY Ot;T 15 1995 LERK +
8 ~04T 66 tYRACVAW
~Q.AT~ S~gg 4p M~
SECT.'A A All(.+K STRFtP (DCThiL c.av~a av 'F 'adi~measu.va b be. a.c.cu.va4)T hue Q~ S iv su.toko Drawn by: Date: 1G 1 Uerified by: Date: /<'- Qua . Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date. l 0 '9'X Cons ruct on Anc or Rev ew Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision .3
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of26 ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25' OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING. Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANKAND MANUFACTURINGCO. 420,000 GALS BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater Yes than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand..
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. Yes COJg NINES SRT: George G. Thomas and Tom Huang on 10/5/93 0
Large flat bottom tank 48'-0" inside diameter 32'-3" height (31'-0" liquid tank). Tank manufactured by Graver Tank, ~ made of ASTM A240 Type 304 Steel, 420,000 gallons and weighs 94,000 lbs. Anchored with 25 3/8" th x 5" w x ~ long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end. 4'4" A detailed calculation was performed to the SQUG GIP criteria as part of the Stevenson 8 Associates report "Earthquake Analysis of D.C. Cook NPP Refueling Water Storage Tank Subjected to Nozzle Loadings to Original and Current Design Criteria", September 12, 1989. The calculation for the RWST resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear. The calculation is included as a document of this SEWS. The tank is founded on a concrete pad per drawing 0 1-2-3048. g4 Although anchora the straps were not rusted to the degree that the SRT judged the;e should be reduction in capacity. A flin ing of the walkdown was that these straps should be cleaned and painted to maintain their integrity. Picture 2, Wk. 1, Tm 2, Disk 1- Pipe at the Bottom of the RWST Picture 1, Wk. 1, Tm 2, Disk 1 - Typical Rusted Strap Picture 3, Wk. 1, Tm 2, Disk 1 - Buckled out Anchor Strap
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 26 ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25' OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING. Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK AND MANUFACTURINGCO. 420,000 GALS Evaluated by: Date:
/~ -zg-
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
Seismic Evaluation of The RWST
& 5 OC Cook Unit1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 26 ID: 1-TK-33 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Meat Exchangers
== Description:== REFUELING WATER STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: RWST AREA, 25' OF UNIT 1 CONT BUILDING. Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANKAND MANUFACTURINGCO. 420,000 GALS Sl)
! g5(
5 <~~<. d,i I
.Li I ~
1~2.C (I.M s ~ I I
.CD&.ii 1
I I P
!
I
'H ~ )
I
.: -'25I ~
I I l s ' s ~ i
~
I 7 I I 7
~ r- j o~ qi gA I
I I Icn e) j I 1 V'-~! +I (',C I(~ ..m r Qgl I I " I 7 I i I 7
!
I ! ' I - .i. I t L l
+
Mod .'C g I C' Ial C~
~
I O'. .OJ - L I klPPl /~
~ ~ ~
iI i I i I I ~ (D'MC.I(.C'B~AuD pig III
'7 I I ~
s h I I ~ ~ I ~ ~ r r
~ ~
i 7
~I I Acct(a I I I'r< ~~
I 8 a~ 7 I 2$ I I j I j j
SUBJECT SHEET OF
'BO Z-nt 4I 0
NM > zan RcJ STEVENSON 50 Ifn>>clUTCHnechonlcot ASSOCIATES NS - ~. C e PP con>>vtttng engtneeltng ttt>>n I! i
~l I L.t~ RQ.C. I a. < ~M.4 P~ I A.'IFt (IP/ ~ et- c.~'a~A I
w~J. E,DclsP !r,aT ~~ I I I I 'I
.<< LL t ti i l t i )p~ p t c eL. Pp~i,~ 'pm,~~.FI,EE sb I, MBLc ~I . k I I I i i >>
I .'! t ~j: . SWJ Q,>>ti m Pg I I ~
':)3~'.ca:~: l g cc.Ec. ~ ~
Cw:.~) C- ~-
' -'. -' -::-Ce)-- -'.--'C~-">-'-.----' C~>--'--:
I . =.I I ' I i '] I i I Tl I
- j. z6 ...,....5;. t .: '.,:2 ~ .'. ]
~ ..l ~ I l
I I. C.'Z CC. %. O i ! t~
~
I i I I . t .,o.5:G.
, ~ ~ T ! ~ I >>
A EFA=. n . t. I W,O i I I i I~~I
>>
09.Z->> I
~,
I I
+I ~
I i
'I 7 8, I i I
4
!
I i ' I I
~ I '
i
+lr,b,o 1
M~K I i'e:~I I~ .P I I I 7 Z,- I ' I i
.,2A T
j ~ I I i I i
~ ~ e*., i., I. ~ ~ t I 1 !
0.i.C,tq-.J Z.dD VZP,s to>>I s !
.in .,'E.F>>, l g,r s~o a.etc a!FFE.c.'rP-'. FE, ~-4-CM~-E M~ 4/t.l ~ TEI m.c.'F- .. F.
Q.Q,~IS.g>>-! M I E>>
~ i P fl>gs q .cc'AGAN n.A '~a 6 c~,~~a.@~'~w~.s..y M.c..ks.
i jpJ i t rex t pU ws.( ~-~, p- ..Ei'.A.,c:)ir ..'< h,>>~<. J
+S.IV ~P-,A.. WHX., !S )
H,z.& . >>FAG,P.h EA.kaIP'nk ..i.m~46 P~ n.p. t.D~ ! H ~C ~C. k.. I C C IFFY I 2 E I I I l i i rrfI
>> I I ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~
I I ~ I
g V
~ ~
EOASP 1.0 Response Spectra 08-03-1989 FREO DAMP DAMP
.050 .040
- 1. 0. 10 9.872E-03 1.008E-02
- 2. 0.13 1.790E-02 1.846E-02
- 3. 0.16 2.700E-02 2.794E-02
- 4. 0.20 3.660E-02 3.798E-02
- 5. 0.25 4.832E-02 5~043E-02
- 6. 0.32 6.133E-b2 6.432E-02
- 7. 0.40 7.518E-02 7.920E-02
- a. O.5O 9.276E.02 9.817E-02
- 9. i 0.63 1.219E-01 1.306E.01
- 10. 0.79 1.434E-01 1 '40E-01
- 11. 1.00 1.702E-01 1.838E-01
- 12. 1.26 2.040E-01 2.217E-01
- 13. 1.58 2.357E-01 2.572E. 01
- 14. 2.00 2.604E-01 2.849E-01
- 15. 2.51 2.834E-01 3.108E-01 1/3 FREQ DAMP DAMP
.050 .040
- 16. 3.16 3.066E-01 3.371E-01
- 17. 3.98 3.290E-01 3.629E-01
- 18. 5.01 3.292E-01 3.630E-01
- 19. 6.31 2.937E-O'1 3.208E-01 fo
- 20. 7.94 2.809E-01 +'.591E-01
- 21. 10.00 2.337E-01 2.514E-01
- 22. 12.59 2.20?E-01 2.367E-01
- 23. 15.85 t'.Zc 2. 292E-01
- 24. 19.95 2%38~1 2.288E-01 25.
26. 25.12 31.62
~92~+ ~ 2 G'$
27. 28. 39.81 50.12 0&61 2A78E 01 ~~1
~05&91 29.
30. 63.10 79.43 ~~1 Qv3BH. Ql 2/3
5 2 - ~6'5 SHEETM~Ol42.~ \
- cf- P-EF 'I g~ S-S
'STEVENSON R ASSOCIATES a Ittuatu)CHnechanlcaf consul)lng cnglnccnng nrrn 2) 2,.e ,4 23 . I 8 aS C+ ( I ~'o ms 4w (I I l O'O I i ! I i I I I L j ~.s 0 C., 3-8J~ C.H&l?=~ I I w4w~w..P ~-V'nil p~ '.T F~
I g ' I I f I
"'
aEWEf=mA I l f j j " C~~~~.~) <.~' I I
.G.~~r~.b.ofI e.&v I' I 'C,fw.C.A . . IA, .
!. l
~
l l c..)
~
i . A &,c .y'.g f
~ f" I:
i, g,
,b..~.f,a LV J.f,a J
C
* .y... ', V.....ExVZa
- 8. I 4 ~oi,7 I,rl I j >
I
&.6)kd.MQAG.=
I
~ .,O L wv.'
P' I I
~ I I ..fd I
I T
.. CV.Cv'6S..
I
~ ~
I I I I ! I I
! ' l .i I L '- I wi I .io'z <~~
I I I I
- c.~~S~4./i'T 05 5"73 /
ri-i'5 I I ~
~pi 4 I
j ( I ( I i I 3 M 'Ao I
'
I ( I i !I ( I ! l1 5 I l I
~ ~ I j=.o, I
I I f a I Ol ~
....Ua i CD I ~l I I g '" 3cO+J ji ;.3'~ lI l
I
e" SUBJECT~&~IC
'J 'u'. P6 JOB No.'
CPS'Q e-s.-e s(i gO CII STEVENSON
'
ASSOCIATES a Iinrcturojtnochonlcot
.C 'C' *Q,P.P III ccnsuNIAII oncinooring Ilrm c o ~ <C Tn I+I ! I ~ +L I J M!5~ ~c~ (~~.E~E. k'~~a I oj~ N Assio <<([a '"=RE..~
! T li C '4:.'...orrT=.. I.~!O 'O. j I I
- l. g
. opj I ,
r nM.II I
' <6,P. .-I "..==.I I I T tj C.C KI ~ ~
I
!: ~
I I I I ( J+ 'L . Q~'~p.'i:MC' i
~ }
I I I I I I I o8
~
I I
!
I I,
' ~
I i I i r<<T $ I I ' t
'Z.Z .I" ~ '-'a' ~ '
I 4 l I
.:,4 c.c I I I ~ Qo i ,
(6 i 4~I 3 oI da I
~
I I T ~ r
I i SUBJECT sosi(0. ++<'1<~7'HssTMa oFEPM K O <<C
,;-.'STEVENSON 8c ASSOClATES a ttructutoHnechantcot 5 (
Cohuttt<<JQ cttglttcctut(I tttttt j H I l -X,.9
.~. ~J3.6 il I.!2Q l ~j I ~
j L j
<<MC P '-
B ~ 0 4<WGR 'lJJ!~<<<<<<<<I. P Q P mJII L Ia4-I j j J Q gS Q~ P'4t e l W jy t
~C' I i j ~ I t
I t I ( I, (
<<
I J I I (
<< $4 ~
j I i
~~+
I-
<<j i I
I
~ I !
j t I
'<<j 1
t << ~ I
' ~ i I .I ~ ! . I I (
3
~ << ~
I ~ ~ I
~ ~-~L~ ~ ~ t I ~
4 S.E GAA.P H.D~ I a.t/,~ 6='
.
I I <<
.'t-.'. ~
Sj
~ ',.'; . ..'S~P..J @ ......,: G'.c~..gg;,~.~ i~a I o....PP-.E'.'.s:~a.+:~ L~a g.;
6 H.tat I Q ' pl@&'C(A D
~,
p, g~( g i.Jci ~ ((<<-tc'; T (7): ~ I l I I Hr~ ..I pl j lQ I I *', ,'./g....j:,...Z 0 ...I.:~, =i j.'.. +
~ ~
t
..)=. J <' >~ p>> .<<0 ~ ~
( I
~ << -c--II . '<< !
P.
Pp I= ID X O STEVENSON h ASSOCIATES
)Itl ttt IK a IttuotWOHneChcnlCOI Cchfttltlttg OttghtOOttttg tttttl t-trg. ~ ~
I I I ~ t I
' / 9?~ 'I j ~(
g TLI g~iQ~ K<M .c aA PA44 ( . ! ( ' t I
' 'I l (
( t t I .'
~
j I L.. t,b I / trr 4 t r r' I t r
~ I
- I I
) 1 3 ' ~
I ~ I IA/ D~.. DE'te." I I I y
- t. E8'.I WN I
~ ~ ~
lt x.EI..
~ ~
H.rw4R:.:,LoAD r I cd'i I ~ I I r I
SUBJECT JOB Ng ~ r! s Ils ~ / r S/'s.s I O'ZcJ V-S-S
'TEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES ccnrvttlng ongrnooltng trim ~-Dc. .RP;~
Qs+ 3 O LL LID 5 PEP L,7 > 8 e, KJ aa I t~4>. w .5 WE,P J I /.Q..... CT*e icI:7- +);: g.j..~C+ 5~ I r S..H.- fc i~ I I I I i s I r ~ s I
'..w c a~@'!
I I
~ ~
I I r--I ~ '- >"-- "',;-
. I I ~ ~ =~
I I
',
IIJ ~>cp.p~Liri'Tlc>,nJ r I " r ' i I i L.J I l q) S zap (...ID,....-... 2.> .'A.R.E....!.. W nH:C.c ~ f I
'
I O. .~ ~
+ H.' Q I i
pQ p ~i~ lt jig nI I Lp~p.+ ~g DQ I 4I ~.t
.. A-.M....,.. -'S i ~ ~ I I ~L?'FPI'l'-I Cia I I
7.O :...Eg.5g.g/i;.. 'Z:B.Ai..+8;CQ 4 9~g~cA.&Q t
' ~
r
~ ~
I I r l
.'L.<mrt,a ww<. CA~+.c,.( mv'. ~ t I, ~ ~
I I '
.I .F4? I r.'C) I&.& ],
j ~ ~ I I C p4( c . 6 6; J..I.S&~3 I I I
' ' <<'tI . ( I I
(..I
~ ~ r ~ ~: I'.C n.y !
I I (. I ~ I I I I ! ~ s ~ I ~ I vrl st I:lsr <<rr rT'.rs,! s, I I I
- L,=..2+% ~;L.. I/. '
i'R 2's /I('
-,.V~ ~,
r
\
r
'
ICE,
'
I t
'i I ~ ! I j
's l, >0 -r ~". I J L. Li I I IN I '-
I 1 I Mr
~ ~
r'r'V '. I I I> ~ I I I 3. I/I rl I ~ s-... I I *q I
~
jr I I j
,.L I I ' I t '!
I l I l
! s i" R' I ~
I I I I ~ t I t
~
I I I
- r. $ sL ~ I I I i
~ .,r r ~ !
SUBJECT i'A,VV.v. STEVENSON 8c ASSOClATES O ItnIClwalmechoNcol consaNng cnginoc!Ing II!m P ~cv C Q.A/A~ g vll .X L tk~~. 3.l.8, A l AA~c- !i .T Ti,y~.
+ 'ip Lam~
wP.EC i i I 8 i
'e i 'A'.Pm Je'~.c.d' ~
P.I-.A.-I 6 I 8 B,Nm 4~
='.!ri, g./JAN 'J,:
I i L cI'I 4 i'j ps';pv~i ~ lDa v p lij~~ns A Q(y.e+$ 5c +=',,Lel...
=' 'l 'ps i !os.d ~
I c5 . C? 2%co'p~
.~ c.c ,~ ,
S,UR E vvj E A, FIc c- .=,$ 5. ~i
>/z'..".)..!2 =,<<!>."~7,.%
- C J
- , .. t=wLQ f g.'wg.nL.v'...
I
~P g~~ P '. P C..~'a I,.PC&,..~~..,...C!g.a v ~i,a P..'.,: .* .
I I I
' ) - . 0 I ~
I
.
T L I P I < i ~ I
! ! 'i ~ \ l I I
L DA &~'~ 'I~A Bee. I
'!N;v.D.i'~ .HK'.~r i . G' ! i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I L t.:,'=.: >' rZ.: CZI .) .=..2S;,3;:W ..2.>..~ L
~ r~.~ ~ 5 H .i~
I A c T'~
a mZ! ~
I i i
-,
PA l(rTVV I
'~i v
T I vi vL.. A,c.v.e~.'~+
' < ~
I T'
'.C'e i
V~/aREFnR .Py~g. I;!:..~B 'EF~Q.460 vILA! ~Kv S
! . !
AacMk I iv'E l: I'.! I! I t;v'.'
~, ~i+.vv<
I I
~ ' ! >
J,
'&
L I I l
- R.I,S~...:.H-C'.,CW . ~o.GS .APE ~4.9.:4:
-I- .,-,.---, '~
I,
'! .;,,, ,
'PC 'ai-I PL a ! '.
I I f"Il r. T-'
' ' '.
i J, i j:
! ! ..'.LL~S I !
v.D'~ &rH.! I2'C~7S)+!O'LZ,.5D=.I
.....,,......v....,. ..... g,v ! .:.;: ! i =
Y"'.vvc. /..iv'v. 'w' T,...!i .....,J. f7 E'...,
?:'
L.:....'.. I.: I ;', ME~OI...CAP,...=
. I Z,5. (,. VCIP) ....; '8;, C7~..: ".3.;. l..7. 67,>C~.=. ~ ~ w v I ~ ~ 'A>> vd ~ v v ~ JA << ~v v 4 v ' ~ v 4 4 V4 lv
SUBJECT vl s S I ~ I+ ~ JOB NI4.+ ~s I id
~2."
M K O STEVENSON Io 80 ASSOCIATES a IIIIIChslCIIIIOChcnleol 0, . C.o III K coniutiinII engineering turn f~ZZ 37" 7"
~ I QI e~L'~C ~ ,'iT I I I I I s I * ' !, 1 5 so..='e..~ r ~i PAL$ qf-r I i L I '. ~ERE( F,'M.Lm. < wWCR &i~~
oC I, 1 M Pr4D dOSi I.Py~&$ a I my'~ lM . T
'9fz 'l~ s i.
PR=~,LED ag.c.". ' I I I r I I
~g C I .~.$ .I.m<.,5, I
r I ~ l
.ua iI I ~ .Q>> ~..C .... C.C a.I~ j.W C. !,n.Wr~g-"..,Sq-..'ygPZ~
I L'e~ k~~.', a.~. .'.. '.:~..~ .. ~~.g i...S 'n U.C-. '.U. S,Z.:. :..+.6; '.
! '.
I.., I I Prs co+.sP=L.na sruti .or.'-.'-.rs 6 CiZ ..I III. f r
.II-I . ~,.CT.I.t I .a ~ ~
I I I ctv E
~ ~m ..8.<
I r I'4 $',.I P.~c.c-.a
~ '..,H ,'I I I .O.u R.. I&..e r
l lgl
+D e MA I'M.C}=i I. e,~c.r .nsr. .]c 4 C..lc ' .~ J '.
I i ta,~i@ES.'t W.~..~ ....(. l
~l! L I ' I i 'A.hD I
S M rE-r
.~'~
I I I ! i I
- I
~ r I I I ',
I I I
'I I
I
~
I r s I ', I rs r ~
~ I - ~
I j I I I I s ~ ~ I I r I ~ I
't t r ~
r, I I I I r I I I
~ I s I s ~ r r r w I I ~ r ~ ~ ~ \ ~ rr s
\
t SUBJECT C ISnn I JOB No. ~~+~ +~~ SHEETglll Ol4~
~ 4
- oa er- P O
Ii) STEYENSON ill 5 ASSOCIATES CC centeIIInii englnoednII nrm i3 I
+~i i; J ~LI I ~ll~
I I i I i I I i I i!
~i i
- 4. I L i
~ ., l
8 Ec5!
. i i i ~
I I I I I I I p i I Ql I. 5 L, 8!7 i I ' I I I f I I t~ I I I I i I LI I
- .2M
'.3 I i,:IC;3Li I7 I
l I I I i
.F~.a ] I I I ~ ~
I I ,hlA~u P.B )
)II' i A ":! I, i ~
i g'< I I I ~
~O.g~v fo' ~
I I i I I gA P'I i i I
'l I I d~ t-.)C )= +i.X4D N 4-.c-cn&lrACs 8
i
.l.+J IO'.II.S i V..S =J.)IL>~~
t W, ! l
SHEET~~~ '~~ O STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES conwNng onglnoorlng Irrm
~/5 I I
21E 2 h' I l
!8 ~e J hAAv=~ ~~ I F ~'u.l2.4'I e~! I I l '
l l 1 I
. ss ' ..D v l I e I
e
-' ! g+s PC <5'IW'V: a f-I 1
I
~ ~
e
.h ! I: 1 ~
H.K L(xP2. r
'~~
I l I I I 1 Ttt& kr
! I !
l k 1 I I e I I I I I l~QtJ I e I
..i l I I I I I i I i ~
i 1
'-
1 1
~
I I i i l J'E Lr g e& ~ e 32 ~ 2 I Dj i 1-8-:5
--f 1 J e e
I e e e e e e ~ 4 I l M1 '.. 3.6I:..Ft'.E.'.MM.A. HE. H .' 4 Z6<<<4 j J I I I e
~
, I l I
- l. l I
l i l I I ' i ' I I
~ v r I . ~ ~ >>~ ie>>e>>e'~EE~
SUBJECT JOB No. (-I+ SHEETBL+ 'OfJQ I <<J. RM'F-S-
CCCC:
STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES O Itiuolvrolctt4Chorticol rir I
<< ~ "
coriirrtttrco 44QIA44rtog Itrrri
, P 8+ 2K. 2hz I g ~ ~ ~ C -i~t , JC,(M 5 t i
- 7. 3M'e6 ~~a ". zfz 8Se'~
L3~: f~ fg
~+I 5
I ri I ( r I I I r
~( y.g I~ 1 i! I'l( ~ ~ i -~ '
I (
., +-, ~
I
. r I I C I .~ ~ ~,.r,,..C \'
Jr
~
r
~
i Mphil i nrr~l4 ~
!, I
(
*" r ~ - '
I I 1
<<.<<",f=rr I " .6$ .
I o<< r . I.="pa cr o-c,<<..r,r I rrr<<rcrff;ao aa I I*<<<<r.<<f r rrw 5
!. '.f, u P T- ) Ql 8 A 0 ES P 5h CP X7- I('gP%gW jFi-,F X'uR~ 8 I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ *I ~ I J C 1 FRE.uEZ,C.r. C.r=., OV..A.I .I i~.6..RI'Xi'Oa .OF .4 ~J,DMH Atua . HANS 7.r H I{I= EROS ...,S~ Ecvz.a~ I 0 IM O JJ ',, ! 5 ! ! (
L 4 LJC C~.HI ~+~ 8++ A5s~ v K ggQ ~ pl+
.re.J..g:S..
I AS ..A:.CS r (
'
H ~f f e~VSC-~,H.'r i
'
I
!~
JP- 8' ! l~ ~l ( I I
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~r =. ~ C ~~
I" I r Ir... I r (>
'
(-~4 Ir r I ( r W I4,! ...,. 3,'5.'L4r? .EI MMs !
~,;
I ! I r i ! r... '.. ', ' a<< ! ~ I l j rL...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !
U 5.(.g,Q, >
~'.~l,'~w~ ~F.v. s. ~ PPP.&x f M.A.+ f ~M <<<<c ~H ~~ i. "
QP'
..CCI g Sg I; hl,~q.u I( A. 8 g(g.~C~ I prrA rrc j I ' i !,'~c l l I 5 I f 4>>
t I ( i, t w 'r ~ << - r C I
'"k>>'>> r Irk k
~ >> ~
SUBJECT I ' JOB No. k I Ill.k=! >>>>F-'>>' k le
'b I>> A~V A i t~ W ~
I>> P 5~ t f . ~ O trYI ~ '
- -. STEVENSON
'.-.; '. at, ASSOCIATES ~ r .';".' Ctcttttlg >> ~ ' a It>>I>>CttltattnootlantCOI 0tlgtt>>00tttlg tits I'C 8~
I
"' f n
I >>
>>
I
~
I} ((J I LIJ T
',li ~
t
- i+ & Br~~
gj i
~
ij I I .'J I
-5 I ~
5' I I l CI-t j ~ Z I l.Z,. P (c 2S o+z) o2> cQoQ (2e+
4/g 4
~ '
J> VV VI>M> IJ
>
CVP u Arc~ n(- KcJ -S-8' 0
!ft STEVENSON ',.', & ASSOC3ATES (t ~
o structrrroHnechohtcot COIN(tthg Oh(t(hchfthg (If!ill
}
I I t 3 i 3
~ ',' t~ t ! ! }
i } 3 ~ t } 3 ~
> ~
I = I i I 1 f; i 3 J I 3 I ~ I I
]~! (
4 1 4 ' } I I I t
}+ J '
I I
}
v
+-
(4 P y.fj, t 4 4D A i I
>}r. I(
( I I 3 I I I I 1 I L I ! i
~ ~ t t ~ ~ ~
3 4 3 I 4 I 3 I I k- ~ ~ I ~ I ' ~
'>> ~ 'I L
I
~ +++ j +~~ IH(IT~OIII ~ 'OB SUBJECT No.
C
).'C. '-,y>,
z N9 cP'-5-8 'pt
', lh 1
O STEVENSON 't'
'
8('ASSOCIATES o )ftucfut~cf)otucof 6@ G c C
~
tuA)uN(thg OtlglhOOflog fltm C s R i . S C>> I,' i
~ ~
I I I a Ii g'W7 P~~! I I X~ESS~ ~ C.6. ~.i.S'~At.8'VT'I.O.+ i ~ t
~ ~
I
~ I )
I R
!"
I li
) j, I ~,
I i e I I I I I I t ~ I L. i I
~:, ! ~
I ~ l I
~ ' ~ ~ '
I l I i ( i I
&r. O..~.&.W.R.Q.;.):6,C EO Sm )4I':~ ~OK.
t j !
&i% . !EQ R.~ ~ I c
I I I Dr~t-. D'~ ~ s 4.~,'<w~nP,~c.~~ urn+ I
!
t ~ I i I i ! t ( D/p I I I l C.35o+- I
)
I I~ E:j M I ~ i 'C ~tV'C fi..4!.D '.E't ~..~~:
~ ~ i I ' ..Pg, ~ '
I
.I . S.O~(=ty 't=) j. I Crt,igPP C.A.C ~ I ~ -I a ., ~, ) ~,, 'I ~ ~,,
I~
~ ~, ~ ~ t '1 ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ., ~ ~ . ~
t
~, ~ . ~ ~ ~~ ~ I
g
- 0
'0
STEVENSON 'I ASSOCIATES a Itn(cturotrnochontcol coewWng eng(noortng firm E E h (~sm r 9$ c(= I r E E I~ S 2
)
I I I
+ ~,.~r s 5'o Q ~ I I r
I ( r ~ ~ I I
) +&, l I LGJ I , S I I
I ln,sac 8& Vt5>QW
'i (s3! ~
( I ( ( I I 8&m i ) l i JVl I ~ ( J
.2 o5.k :
Cpp
- 4) I (
"i II I E
i~~7 I I (a g i I I -" / 2 'Q Lo5 I X- CE L 1 I L.' )
.j L I . L
tt d II 0
i UP7 tmA C F- ej & SHEET '4~~ ) 0 5 m r I Ctt z 0
-s-Itt STEVENSON 8; ASSOC1ATES -P. c Ut cont)itttng entttneerlntt tltm f ~ ~ ~l L ! ~
7(o 'i I (,I t .'o.+77gg I 'R-O t'<5~Lt'QF 5' t:.SIC'R
~ ! i cate jM~ b S.~~a.oJjR,O . I P.~~~V "4" .!jct B j~jt I ) 'OS)), I 3; 4't) ~~,
1 ~ I ! i I
.D CI 7 ~ .~R C ~....~i +, Q if i I ~
j J+ pent')' s', l t l
~ I <~ - .,r' "
SVZ i 3 35 i
) '.""co s t)'i(3-'j, ~ ','.c)n7 '
5~
'I P -,'ace.II"lo ~ ~ ~ ~
I I ~ ~ ~ * - I J i ~ ' 5'
~ ~
j ~
~ ~
I I ~) I iL i I I l
.'...5 Q ~pj, ij... h/ pea ( +~ +i i'P I l I jc~ l t ~&.2i tt t t
I I ~
~ ~ I I ~
I t, tt) tl j i f
~.....'3.,5.Q '" .'+ 5.O 2-.2 %9;.K 5;....'P I ..p,e ~ ..t) S'.i. .p.s,.l,, )
I..... y .J3.3.4 t.','...., y.:.= CC3.C I J
',Ir.i =... I H =.:.37 t ~ 'rr I
t.(n.,o po F
.J'4-n p~g
I
.= 'J&.2.: ..! ' ~ ~
l ~ ~ i I I I I I
++ tt ~.3.l.f P s.i =.='.=.
( t f i \ i I . I ~ I I 5 i t ti I jo J I ! I I I I i\ i I ( * ~
~ ~ ~
4 . A << IA 4 ) I~ A'y
r'ai <Q, SUBJECT (C 'OB No.
~u'i(~c ~DC l ss ssr@~orrt< ~l~sls ~. "ss ~ fs s
s~0 s rats c."J n-rr,r'rot V) 4/ ~5 ~g s z O rrt
,;.; ";.'TEVENSON '"'-
Ik ASSOCIATES o slructuroirnochonlcol AP.R cc consurrrng ongrneerlng tlrrn ~r i;, ~ . r'M gH~ Im~ Q 2 (~
'.K i t
J L'u .P,. g ~.~') M<.csO.A .a.,&,5 r (
~
IO+'(-
.....s l~r .. l ic k,. , i C.s .. MH ./i AsJ,rtc s.
to y. I'P.~i ~
~ ~> =,3 2 co .'c' rc....'-ps) F R I=-~ w.(.a.k'. ~'..:.7~L L~ ~
r r ~ I A.w ~ ~..$ p'.ig.'<i,.4 t.C
, .Pg;:C.~ 5 r(c:C sJ ~
h'.. WnJ'g,g ~< ~ I
<<',H..p ' '.s-r,~
F J ~
.Ent.C .t W.'.~r,,<~~tl C I
F~ 8 D.A.n'< E.,rt h:e r~ ! . t p'I.Q 6, .J., Cl t g o 4 r. f~ r. i r I r r I ( I,
~
( E I t I i ~ L L
,'3 4 5+ ~ ..I n. J .
7Q r, I l ~ 8S x lc ~HZ -(. 2 359 I I I = 2-; i I 3/a(e da I r
~ I I I r ~ -. '
I I i 4.+z '~ t i I e I
~1 '
Lsd i i .8-Q rns~MM L
'L r - ~ ~ 1 I
~ 4 CC, ~ )C f ','TEVENSON . .- 8CASSOClATES O Ithfotchc<<hOChoh<CO<
cohfcfltlhp cop<hoof<tip hfhl SUBJECT Ar )' G.O'S <
~ 'O .'G:c. c.~! A PP ': .
R O V) U< SHEETS~'PF gP ~'
.<r r'O ~ <5j $ < &S 'C .8 '5o ~O ,
I Jt0~$ I ~ I x 3 I I I
+-l- +
I I
+!i I )~!i I !' I I I T9- W!~UL3.ed 1 ~C I .~
i 1, ' I W'7 ff' i I I I r, 1 c ~
~ ~ ~
1 I
~ I ~ I ~ I I I I I ~
1
" 1 r I I I I I ~ ', j I I
I
~ I5 + x In.~B' ~~v5'3'f ~ ~~ R <j~.. IO S I 8 I~ ~)
l I i
~! I M V .,.7.e.Z), ~
W, L- Z d,27 ~,g 4~E!,Q~ 'Z. I I +- I I ~ ~ I I I I
<.. ~.
I I I i f I
~
C
~ ~ ~ ~
I < 1 I I I I ~ ', ~ . I ! i I ~ ~ ( J g.a I S.,i,)(,~.4 ...,E,0<~I.Oa. C.C- =A<< S .FuP-rt.v<..<S.. i og-I ! I ~ 1 I
~
r I r r I I KSS:S.... e&l I I:'r
~:. ~
1 S I c
'E . ... ~
rcr,
~ +,:='.+.I;(C26 CClCS..)i..~I+,+<<., *r . . ~ ~
a.
~ ~ ~,. .C...I '.
e~c
' 1 I '.....I-rhrrrf....;,.I ~ c I
I
~ .c r ~ ..A ~
SUBJEGT 4
~ c. ri, J jOBMJ:-J33C f55 9..'.'SHEET/2 I B~2Z:: +Ac Y <g.. f-0 d Wc' ~ 'I STEVENSON EO ~"
IJS ~ J S k 8c ASSOC}ATES O ItnjclllloH54Chonlcol conIIJINny englneerlny ntm I7 axe I cn+
~ ,po 1~ . ~ ~
I 7p I;"
} I }
I I I
~ I i )
r~ I I L 1 E ~ R !8 ~ C-~iP'IO~IE.<~ C
} 'I I J } i I ~
i 4 R. E A P'+ ! )'pl '. Qg t4'5(o 4 ~ I
>>. 1.F.U<~<6.%3:[ a~I?=Aj C L ..
S~IE- JJ JI I I) I SZ,I2 O
~ ~ ~
I 1
,.Z. B&' ~ I I I
A I
i g 0 1l R h
> 'I
'1 1 1terrrr 14 r rA ~ 1 rt SUBJECT '~ t;tt Wr r~g ~ V.tri ~--
Ok &/ . "T et e:i ii'~ '" +X
>."""'11 0
ro
':4"""~~"STEVENSON UI "..'-".: 8t ASSOCIATES" "".-';;: '-', cr. .".ggq Jt..r" rut-r ..rt)tpf.
conrurrrnp enprnaorlng nrrn pPi 3 ~ I ~ I I ct W~ 8.~ g
'7+-8+1-.(-1 604 SW.'t52,4 ~Res 4~ ~ ~ ++ I t I ' ~i ' ~l i~ ~
I I I I I I I ZSB- Z S.'8 '
.I e ~ ~i I II ,w C.2.B,B:, IA 2S.S I I P-..C . 5 ~ ~
4 ~
~
I.'real 1 !Let. QQ)8' 'I I
!
I
.f.'g tI ~ J j 5. pcI Wff..rf' f. ~
- k. '- (.8 <J g ~~i~s4!
--~l 1 ~
t I I I I I
, ('7 4rtt Ct~ I '
g, r I t I I r r 1 r r (g~,gg) i
'CAP I I I ~
g'++; 'h3'
~ i 1
I J
- t. t 2) + (7O,>u)( (to 4. Q I+
' I l 1 I ~ 1
~
t I Ki~S < J)
~ I V ~ ~
Equip Id: 2-TK-32 Train: 12 Equip Class: 21
'ng No.: 2-5106A Function: D System: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK SUPPLY Equip Desc: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Room: INNER PLANT GROUNDS Elev: 609 Sort: Sg Notes:
Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK MFR: GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO., INC. l: 500,000 GALS. Panel: Elem. Drawing: NOT APPL Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Eval: N
- i'omp Type
- TANK Iso Drawing:
Location: 50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 3 ID: 2-TK-32 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT GROUNDS - 50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK & MFG. CO., INC. 500,000 GALS. BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater Yes than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments'is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. Yes E P El IC COJHI)LES SRT: George G. Thomas and Tom Huang on 10/5/93 Large flat bottom tank 52'-0" inside diameter 34'-5 1/2" height. Tank manufactured by Graver Tank, made of ASTM A240 Type 304 Steel, 500,000 gallons and weighs 128,700 lbs. Anchored with 30 3/8" th x 5" w x 4'4" long strap that is embedded in the concrete 2'epth with a 2" radius hook at the end.
The strap detail is identical to the strap for the Unit 1 and 2 refueling Water Storage Tanks (RWST) 1-TK-33 and 2-TK-33. The calculation for the RWST.resulted in the conclusion that the weld to the tank and embedment in the concrete was sufficient to develop the full yield strength of the strap. The RWST has a very similar configuration as this CST. The calculation for the RWST using GIP methodology indicated an overall safety factor of 2.57 for overturning and 1.72 for shear. Calculation is attached to the SEWS of 1-TK-33. Comparison of significant attributes of the tanks is shown below: RWST CST 48'iameter 52'iameter 31'iquid Height 31'-7" Liquid Height 25'trap Anchors 30'trap Anchors For shear the tanks are essentially identical since the demand and capacity are both proportional to the area under the base.
4%,h II 's'.il r
DC Cook Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 2-TK-32 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Meat Exchangers
== Description:== CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK Building: GROUNDS Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: INNER PLANT GROUNDS - 50 FEET SOUTH OF THE UNIT 2 CONTAINMENT DOME Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: GRAVER TANK 8 MFG. CO., INC. 500,000 GALS. ELXUHIR T 7
,, jest y4)4X, h P ~ o 'p ht ~
g t h 2'uckled Pipes at the Bottom of the RWST Out Anchor Strap
+*12 CHP 5021.CCD.O].9 ATTACHMENT NO.
B g. Location I- K-30 '2 Tg-'7'4 Insta at on wg. / Rev. Ecgxxpment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
~gDGg<RTE KToRRG6 fdic Ii DIN&4<<od.->< DIp g s4.-S/< %AH McA)R +'TRRPs ~
( bbJQ QT'p.~ fQ )NQ~gQQ,~)
>+B GF TM H~~ U~y pp~~~~ s~~<'T y+" p~T 4 FK.LES,Q)Gu6 ~<<~TIos 1 QF T W ~TO ~g ~U RAT-INDIANA MICHIGAN POWE~R SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY OCT $ 5 tBS5 Drawn by: Date:
Verified by: Date: Qua . Ce Inspector Reviewed by: Date: t o-l> Cons ruct on Anc or Review Engineer page 1 of 3 Revision .3
0
**12 CHP 5021.CCD 019 ~
ATTACHKENT NO. 1 Eblis CQ N p ~C S I0 C,M c Un t B g. I
'l-'90 4 9 2. T(c- '3Q Insta~ at on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ament Sketch
~/g wl L Q~R Ae&- O~g, 0
I N 3/yx5" <Toms 8("KY' r < Q~ rb b INDIANA hflOg, AN POLI c SITE OKSIGN C "ITROLL WORKING OPY OCT '[5 1995 LERK T
++ 4~ '5 A'~'amS OIIYl~I4N + ~847 rn&AS'uk'a~~~ %6$ 4~TIW- 8 '3 C7~
e,~so'F
~
ts, ~S 8Q'ECT.'A A WIICy)X 4~Re'>~T<< Drawn by: Date: I o 'l2 Verified by: D te: Qua ./Ce . Inspector Reviewed by: Date: I o-<3-'7> Cons ruct on Anc r Rev ew Engineer Page 1 ol.' Revision
ATTACHMENT5 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE SEWS, ANCHORAGE CALCULATIONS, AND ANCHORAGE INSPECTION DOCUMENTATION FOR HORIZONTAL TANKS AND HEAT EXCHANGERS RAI ITEM 7
This attachment includes sample SEWS, anchorage calculations and anchorage inspection documentation for the horizontal tank and heat exchanger evaluations requested in RAI Question
- 7. Included in this attachment are the evaluations for 1-HE-14, 2-HE-15E, 12-HE-16N, 1-QT-107-AB, 2-QT-1 1$ -CD, 1-HE-.15E and 1-QT-107-CD.
01/16/92 PG. N0.53'AFE SHUTDOWN EQUIPMEHT I.IST (SSELWP) FUNCTION: CC'W Equipment Class: 21 Train: 12 Equipment ID: 1-NE-1C Drawing Number: 1-5135 System: CVCS Equip
Description:
LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Ruilding: AUXILIARY Room: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER ROOM Elevation: 633 Normal state: Desired state: Power Required: H Sort: Suooorting System Drawing Number: acquired Interconnections and Supporting Components: fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATIOQ Al ias Number: Power Train: NA Comnonent Served: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHAHGFR Manufacturer: AILAS INDUSTRAIAL MANUFACTURING CO Model: 1000 GPM Panel: Elem Drawing: H/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdownt F Relay Only: N Comoonent Type: HE (ONE PER UHIT) ISO Drawings: Detailed Location:
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of3 ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANG, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIALMANUFACTURINGCO, 1000 GPM BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a targe, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
-5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, fIat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A SRT: Gary Thomas, and Tom Huang on 11/3/93. ANCHORAGE ADEQUACY ACCEPTABLE TO SRT BASED ON BACK OF ENVELOPE CALCULATIONSHOWN BELOW. Nozzle loads on heat exchanger are small (on the order of 600 lbs. and 600 ft.-lbs.). Anchored with 2 - 7/8" diameter J-bolts on 11-3/8" spacing. Vertical distance from the base of exchanger to the C.G. of exchanger is 13". Vertical d'stance from the base of the exchanger to the top nozzle is 29". Supports for saddle dowled into base concrete. Saddle supports are adequately reinforced to transfer loads to bolts. SRT judged that the Heat Exchanger is rigid. Back of the envelope calculation: 0.24g (DBE ZPA at floor) x 1.25 (for realistic spectra) x 3320 lbs. (wt. of HX) x 13" (to C.G.) / [2 (bolts) x (11.375")] + 700 Ibs x 29" (Nozzle loads)/(2 x 11.375" ]+ 700 (ft. -Ibs) x12 in/ft/(2 x11.375") = 1830 lbs. tension/bolt-3320 (.76g )/4 (dead wt. - vertical earthquake) ) = 1199 lbs. tension/bolt
.24 x 1.25 x 3320/4 (bolts) + 700/4 = 424 lbs. shear/bolt Embedment for the 7/8" diameter J-bolts is 19.5" or 19.5/.875 = 22.3 bolt diameters into concrete. RLp for embedment (90 degree hook) = ]19.5+8(7/8)]/(62.5 x.875)=0.49. Allowable for tension = 20.44 x 0.49 = 9.8 k >
1.2 k. For shear = 10.22 k > 0.424 k. OK.
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 3 ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANG, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIALMANUFACTURINGCO, 1000 GPM Evaluated by: Date: 8/f5 (~>w (p (p-
Attachment:
Pictures
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2 Corrected 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS} Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 3 ID: 1-HE-14 (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 633.00 Room, Row/Col: LETDOWN HEAT EXCHANG, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: ATLAS INDUSTRAIALMANUFACTURINGCO, 1000 GPM Overall Exchanger Saddle Support
Coo ComponenC No. Class Any parget:icular area the Seismic Roviev Teaa should pay oxtra attontion to? Yes < No (If yea, check items that apply.) 5 Anchor
~
Type khamxha Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing lhd 4= kt('.~<fn r( 'I '< ~ P~ Anchor Number Anchor Embedment~ Anchor Anchor Edge distance Thread Engagement Cepv'nchor Anchor Grip lg" ~4/) J (p C04~AJ (T Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (((sstribs NO bl AS~5. )~ brisrly) (
"
Ik~~
~ N 5<,&~
I f IE there ia concern, for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.
- 1. Hardvare Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. Dra~ing Up&,te Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operabili.ty/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:
Actions Taken: lJDIJB (AG.H P PrO(AT(O(~ Prepared By T Data ('s >l P--
'HP 5021 CCD.019 ..i'TACHMENT NO 1 ALlX I 33'-O" EL. LETDOWN BEAT EXCHANC ER RQQM Bl g. Location lt 5bPI-ZZ - HE.- I4-lZ,- 332.5 - '9 I Insta at on wg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch OI DUE, TQ HIC H RADIA'TIOM AREA 4 CSO v.~b HALT LOCKTIQMS WE.PE. CC
'V NQT QBTALME.D QM THC KkG1 PE.D'E5'TAL C)GI VlERE, DEXERMME.Q 5(M(LAR TQ THE. WEST PE.QEGTAL.
Wr II/ N 5'~z-'a I'iz," 5'e" 0> 5E.C T/QM "4-A" PLA,M I Drawn by: Date: 4! -Z>-'B Verified by: Date: ua ./Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: 7 Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
++12 CHP 5021 CCD. 019~
ATTACHMENT NO. quipment No.: ~ ~ I-HE-I4. pgg No.: IZ-3)ZI-U. II IZ-3.)ZE ~ Anchor type: ~ ~ >~<~ ~~PE Z Dia: gag No.; IZ-50 t ) -ZO Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: Cal. Due Date: Tightness verified? 0 Yes 0 No Date: ons ruc on Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes I No ons ruc o Date: ARE Bolt ID I ~ 3 4 Comments GaPs BFlwk5l BEfivEEIU Anchor len th I 2 '- I '~z"
~
Z'- I'li - 4lg " I ~i" 7'- I'jz" "L Protruding 41'~z"
~sic --~6~.
41'l4"
~ -~su 41 len th )I'-7 lc I'-7~i~" I.'- /'rz" I'-7Yz- >8'/4" >8" W Rli "dh a7Vr.
Bolt ri 2>/4 " 2'1("
"~V~
L>~
~'/
C.SACK Ihl Concrete ~1( CGMCRETT: condition UOTII SIDE5 Edg>> 4'/q 4 '/4 distance, Anchor ~/s" II ~~a" s acin II Anchor (50'LQ an larit 4 IO' lQ Thread CD I( OIC OK &IC engagement Comments 4 QtlE TD Hlf' RADIKfloLI AREA Iso Ar'I MLT Loc.ATI wERc hloT QKTAll.l THC EAST P WERE DE:TER~I IMILAR, TO THE UV'C5i'T PE'0 'TAI Ih R ll ICo A I hl SPEC T'L(5hl. 15 I R \h H R Varified by: Date: Qua ./Cert. Inspector Revieved by! Date! T'ons ruct on Page 2 of 3 Revision l
siss've wi vvui ver ATTAVBKNT NO. l l- HE,- l 4- Dug No.: re& edded Steel Dwg. No.: Weld ID W~ WS Vl4 WS 'IMr- WV Wa, des l l l Size I/~ I/~ I/S 1 ~ Fillet 3(/v ( (/~ ~y &>> (/4IP 3(/ gr I, (/ /~/4"(('//, /y ">> '//,lg">>'l4" ~((~I/ >> 2 ~ Plllg/slot 3 ~ Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes No QKO Lack of Yes s Yes Yes Penetration No Porosity Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes's Yes Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes 8- No ons ruc x Reviewed by: ons ruc son c or evxev ngxneer Uerified by: To <~+wc. s ua . e . npsec or
<<~ o Date:
Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
ssaC aVC J ~ 4 SU ~ V J V ATTACHMENT NO. 1
~ipment No . 1- HE, - l4 No.: WR Dwg added Steel Dwg. No.:
Meld ID es' Size l~ Fillet g >/g'~~lg " Plug/Slot 3 ~ Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes YQS Lack of . Penetration ~ KaJ No Yes No No Yes No No
.Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Porosity Y o
Yes No Yes No Yes No Yes'es No No Yes No Yes No Equipment hase flexible: 0 Yas E No on ruc z n a Reviewed by: ons ruc son c or avxew gxnaer Veri.fied by: 7c l e Date: e . np ec r Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
S 8 A DEPARTMENT CONTROLLED DOCUMENT 12 SHP 5050 NDE pp8 COPY NO. 3- ~ ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: ~l REPORT DATE: REgUEST NO. IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit Test Unit/ S/N 5k Component Freq./Diameter Item Reference Standard Material Couplant/Batch No. '7 SB Other 5 TEST DATA REMARKS PERFORMED BY: LEVEL ~ DATE REVIEWED BY: LEVEL:~'- DATE: Z5 FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip ID: 2-HE-15E Train: 2 Equip Class:21 wing No.: 2-5135A 2-5113 tion: CCW System: COMPONENT COOLING WATER Equip Desc: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 HALLWAY Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: 4 Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER MPR: M.L.W. INDUSTRIES Pa el: Elem. Drawing: NOT APPL Wiring Drawing: NOT APPL Power Source: NOT APPL Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: HE Iso Drawing: 2-CCW-41, 2-CCW-42 Location: 30 FEET EAST OP THE N2 MONITOR TANK
DC COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of2 ID: 2-HE-15E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 609 HALLWAY-30 FEET EAST OF THE ¹2 MONITOR TANK Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: M.L.W. INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A C LL 0
~CO I~S SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang, and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93. Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles. Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts. There are 4 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction. C.G. of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'. Pedestal concrete is cracked. AEPSC tracking the problem through a condition report. SRT has reviewed the resolution of this problem and determined that it is resolved. This unit is the same as 1-HE-15E except there are no horizontal anchors on 1-HE-15E. The anchorage for this exchanger is more robust. The calculations of 1-HE-15E show that the anchors are adequate and the saddles are safe. sb.~ Evaluated by: Date:
,
ttachment: Pictures
DC COOK Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 2-HE-15E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== EAST COMPONENT COOLING WATER HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: 609 HALLWAY-30 FEET EAST OF THE ¹2 MONITOR TANK Manufacturer, Model, Etc:: M.L.W. INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) BLCLI le ONE SADDLE WITH 4 HORIZONTAL BOLTS OTHER SADDLE SUPPORT
Coo Component No. '2- I S E Cloaa Any pazpicular area tho Seismic Review Teaa should pay extra attontion to? Yea < No (If yea, check Stoma that apply.) Anchor Typo Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor lumbar Anchor Embodmont+ Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap M Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Cracks'thers (describe briefly) If there ia concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle tho applicable atom and explain.
- 1. Hardvare Maintenanco Type Discrepancy
- 2. Dra~ing Update Typo Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy Others Condition:
HotJ8 Actions Taken: 9 SING Preparod By Dasa
**12 CHP 5021 CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET 2 6)x B..goy'-0" worry sourH ~w~q Unzt 0 Bldg. Location i2.- B~Qg- 2s,iz-3zb- z-R6-l56 Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 74'-'/a
~tt Ypg l~
0 I C,RPICe IIJ4ROVl . J C+ACK II I 6 CCouT INDIANA MICHIGAN POVIER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED Y(OR KING COPY AUG 24 1S95 LERK
/~g CRAuC T'O FLIIIIR 0 '- l'/a +'/5 (gyp)
Drawn by: Date: Verified by:
~ ~
Date: & Qual. /Cert. Inspector
~ ~
Reviewed by: 7 Date: 8 ~ t~ Construction Anc or Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET
- 2. he~ M bO I'-O" NORTH ~GATV ~W~q Unxt Bldg. Location l 2.-3285-23 f2-'328 Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch INOIANA MICHIGAN POvggR SITE DESIGN CONTROLI.EP
'tYORKING COPY AUG 24 tSIIS I.ERK ROOT@ TOP ~
Y9P cR.Ac.z XoIVV e6T. 08.00T 4 CoLlC, g t BOGCf FB. Wl PB)K'TEIDE 't'L 0 IJ 0 ly+ 7z 'y 7-E <S~
<>xP)
El Ev. ~<ca UooicuQG Drawn by: Date: Verified by: Dat:e: gua ./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T Date: Construct on An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
0
**12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET 2
Unxt 0 Bl..IOOq'-g~I Bldg. hJQATA COOT/ HAU Location u~ l2.- N. SS-25, is-32eg- z- HB-t58 Installatz.on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch z- Bg - i'd%
~ Ql/g 9 lOC4TlOA 0$ ~(,N0R.
d ItIDIANA MICMIGAW POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY AUG 24 1998 LERK T-4 C <
~ c gv i 0 EL.CV. U'I - UO k IQ OuY Drawn by: Date:
Verified by:
~ ~
Date: gual./Cert:. Inspector Reviewed by: Dat e: Constru tron chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
0
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET 2 PrOX &1 - boq'-o" NORTH SbQTH RPn~+
Unzt 0 Bldg. Location 12.-8296- S t2.-3xg-Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch QOGIFI@) AT4X+ I /bklg (7Yp() CRRcX 7 6 O~
)'p j94C80 8, uJP 5AER 0
V INOIANA MICHIGAN PO)VER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED YYOR KING COPY AUG 24 1895 LERK + CI
~ ~
a p CPP ~ f~Q Volh)7 gC,TWd&hl 4,RouT~ MQC. d EI Eu . J)EM tppkxÃI 0 IA Drawn by: Date: Verified by: Date: Q a ./Cert. InsPector Reviewed by: 7 Date: Construction An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 502 1. CCD. 0 19 ATTACHMENT No.
Equipment No.: Anchor type:
'-
Z HC BGU IGC Dwg No.: IR-3298" f Dia: Dvg No.: Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Wrench No.: rJA Cal. Due Date: Tightness verified? 0 Yes 5 No HR ons ruc Equipment base flexible7 0 Yes S. No T'ns c o ARE Bolt ED t 2, 3 + Comments Gaps o Anchor +I p]~ +I g/~'i I3q.~3(~" ~tv QW4 len th > a-3o13 8-Z Protruding q3/~ )IS(I 37/ <o~mCC h >'en
~>/8'. 5'ee eEL v Embedment Z~ ~~~ ZI ~I~/', '/< 2'4 Q ~r I Bolt To~mc6+>/g ri ~ /8 E"/IIo 2'IX. < "/II &" .
Sbg LjoTE GEL4w. Concrete CRAB CRACK. GRfKK GRhW CEGTcH condition Edge (oo distance To~&+~/~'nchor Tp L,~W <6 s acin I/q" Anchor an larit Thread engagement Comments. X /Ig'g~ &67~ QLITJtHASSSR, Yiq 4'GTW6&J Wm~ oI PII R CRIT 0 Serai 0 'I4h OI 'T RIP ~HOT
~ P M u RR ~ C'TTo verified by: Date:
Qua ./Cert. nspector Revieved by: D te: 8->> Construct on SITE. DESIGN CONTROLLED YIOIIKING COPY
'UG 2419SK "I'ERKT Pa e2of 3 Re ision 1
**12 CHP 5021.CCD.P19 ATTACHMENT No, Equipment No.:
Anchor type: < ~
~ ~ ~t.
Tightness established by: 0 "Snug PrH(&OP. Dia: Fit" I'wg E Torque kg No.: No.:
'+ >>S8- ~> 8>"ZA l?-- Board I
Torque Wrench No.: P Cal. Due Date: Tightness verified? I Yes 0 No S ons ruc
%a~~ ion Date: 4.<> 95 Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8 No ons ruc ~~ on ARE Date: 0 +> 13 Bolt ID Comments Gaps Anchor len 7~/y'ual Ct II Protruding len h Embedment 5l(q."
Bolt ri C n ete C,~< MPCQ CRPcv CppcE. condition
" Vo TOP SHIIT Edge /I (p $ ~/l(p 4 4 OFC distance /II (3/$V )3tqlI gyl Ta ToPoF AN<
s Anchor acin 5" I g'3/8" 5', C ~(<I," Anchor an larit 0 0 0 Thread engagement Og. ot'K, Comments: Y~ gh ac.ss A~MJ I by: C'erified Date: Qua ./ ert. Inspector evieved by: Date: Const ct on ARE INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY 24 AUG 19S5 o2of 3 Re ision 1 LERK
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 OR S CT 0 Equipment No.: Dwg No.: I 2-8>98-Embedded Steel Dwg. No.:
CAL Weld XD QL gZ W3 We e Codes T e Size ~li Io ~hb 1 = Fillet g] ~ 2 = Plug/Slot Len h 3 = Groove Cracks Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No No No Lack of . Les Yes Yes es Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration QR No No No No No Porosity Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes No No No . No No INDIANA MICHIGAN PO'LYER
&GQ hi< SITE DESIGN CONTRCI.LEO IVORKING COPY ~
J)
'R. ~/~3 44 AUG 24 1895 RYgxqx. q" +4 ~
4 o IA
'4. .0, ~
4. 4
~ ~qyeHh RCCBpT 7~ ~O~"
Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes g No 1 ons ruc z n e Date: <-2'~ Reviewed by: ons ruc ron c or evxew ngxneer
- ~S. -3 ified by: Date:
ua . e . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
12 SHP 5050 NDE.008
~/
8 A DEPARTMENT S ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTROLlED DOCUMENT COPY NO. Uf TRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO<<: :~/.>>. ~ * . /A IDENTIFICATION Unit Waa Test Unit/ S/Nfl VSR- CNC-9'K Component Freq./Diameter .asD Item A~a. Reference Standard &C'-8 Material Couplant/Batch No. ~ ~/~ lP88 Other 5 TEST DATA REMARKS EE P. EPV C. I E
J ~ PERFORMED BY: LEVEL:~~ DATE: IY'-/3 ~z3 REVIEWED BY: LEVEL:~ DATE: FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
~
Yi atabase: K:SSEL1B.DBF Equip ID: 12-HE-16N Train: 12 Equip Class:21 ing No.: 12-5136, 1-5135
~ ~
Function: SFP COOLING AND CCW
~
System: SPENT FUEL PIT COOLING & CCW Equip Desc: NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: U-1 AUXILIARY Room: SPENT FUEL PIT HE ROOM Elev: 609 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: STANDARD Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA ~ Comp Served: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP MFR: 5: Panel: Elem. Drawing: Wiring Drawing: Power Source: Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: HE Iso Drawing: 12-SF-5, 7, 1-CCW-l, 7 Location: NW AREA OF RM
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NWAREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP. BASIS: Horizontal TANK analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A C
~CM@NN Q RT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang and Kailash Mahajan on 11/3/93. 3' 2" diameter horizontal heat exchanger about 22'ong on two saddles supported by piers. Total weight full given as 26,200 lbs. Exchanger bolted into pier with 4 7/8" diameter bolts per saddle. Piers are dowled into floor. The results of tank analysis show that the tank anchorage is adequate and also the saddles are safe. Evaluated by: Date:
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
TANK Analysis Results
Attachment:
Check of Stresses in Saddles
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet2of9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RIVI, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP. NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER
DG COCK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3 of 9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP. TANK Analysis Results Step 1 Input Data a) Assumptions
- 1. Tank is cylindrical, horizontally oriented and supported on saddles. Yes
- 2. Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel Yes
- 3. Saddles are uniformly spaced. Yes
- 4. Saddles overhang is less than spacing /2 Yes
- 5. Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under Yes the fixed saddle.
- 6. Imposed nozzle loads are not significant. Yes
- 7. The tank foundation is adequate. Yes
- 8. Anchor bolts are cast in place or expansion type. Yes b) Materials Weight of Tank+ Fluid 26.2 kips Weight Density of Tank+ Fluid 151 Ibs/ftn3 Saddle Elastic Modulus 30000.0 ksi Saddle Shear Modulus 1". 500.0 ksi Base Plate Yield Strength 30000.0 ksi Anchor Type 7/8 in 90 deg. J-Bolts c) Dimensions Tank Diameter, D 3.17 ft Tank Length, L 22.0 ft Tank Thickness, t 0.44 in Height of Tank+ Fluid C.G., Hcg 2.16 ft Number of Saddles Saddle Spacing, S 13.0 ft Saddle Height, h 4.9 in Saddle Shear cross-sectional area 23 63 inn2 Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Interia 24.36 in"4 Number of Bolt Locations / Saddle Number of Bolts / Bolting Location Extreme Bolt Spacing, 1.83 ft Bolt Eccentricity, e D'nchor 3.0 in Weld Thickness 0.188 in Base Plate Thickness 0.5 in
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet4of9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP. d) Anchor Bolts Type = 90 Deg J-Bolt Diameter = 7/8 in Manufacturer = Product Name = Pullout Shear Nominal Capacity 20.44 kips 10.22 kips Concrete Compression Strength, fc' 3500.0 psi Reduction Parameters Capacity Reduction Factor Label Check Condition Pullout Shear
- 1. Type of Anchorage Yes 1.0 1.0
- 2. Installation Adequacy Yes Installation is adequate 1.0 1.0
- 3. Embedment Length Yes Embedment Length = 18.75 0.47 1.0 in
- 4. Gap at Threaded Anchors Yes Gap size = 0.0 in 1.0 1.0
- 5. Spacing between Anchorages Yes 1.0 1.0
- 7. Concrete Strength and Condition Yes 1.0 1.0
- 8. Concrete Crack Location and Size Yes Crack Size = 0.0 in 1.0 1.0
- 9. Essential Relays in Cabinets No
- 10. Base Stiffness and Prying Action Yes '1.0 1.0
- 11. Equipment Base Strength and Yes Base strength and load path 1.0 1.0 Structural Load Path are O.K.
- 12. Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Installation is O.K. 1.0 1.0 Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters?
2- The allowable bolt loads Vu'.211 Step Allowable Tension Load, kips Shear Load, Pu'llowable 7.967 kips Step 3 Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor RB 346.7068
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes 5 of 9 'heet ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEATXCHGR RM, NWAREAOF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP. Step 4 Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor RW 3.3848 Step 5 Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads Allowable Anchorage Tension Load, Pu 7.211 kips Allowable Anchorage Shear Load, Vu 7.967 kips Step 6 Calculate the ratios and values alpha (Pu/Vu) 0.91 3.28 kips/bolt Vu /Wb 2.43 Hcg / 1.18
/S D'cg 0.166 F1 2.236 F2 2.475 Step 7- Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage lambda 1 1.088 G lambda u 0.772 G Anchor Acceleration capacity, lambda 0.772 G Step 8 Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response Maximum Saddle Spacing, Sc 13.45 ft Step 9 Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction Saddle Stiffness, Ks 13948.206 kipsfin R nant Frequency of Tank in Longitudinal Direction 72.15 Hz
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of9 ID: 12-HE-16N (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
NORTH SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: SPENT FUEL PIT HEAT XCHGR RM, NW AREA OF RM Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: OAT, JOSEPH, CORP. Step 10 Determine the seismic demand acceleration ZPA 0.275 G Tank is rigid in all three directions. Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA Step 11 Check the saddle stresses The program does not check the saddle stresses Check the saddle stresses by an independent calculation
CUENT Cr
~ H~hmou Stevenson and Associates A Struoiurnl Mnohnaionl conrulbag Engiauutiny Firm /gag: .4~ J,l~ s4 ke:ss e.s i .
P II I I I I 1 I i3<<) VI S
/r'""
24'z
'j8' * '
irin<yjt.p /g.u.IIII .<<.g '(., J = ...3 .I PS
-'A--n.o-L Aro-'n I ".CIopn.oI ig g '= r Ir0 J. (I:rru CI'FiOar) --Z'.pa-- .'pg j.
E
~
I " ~ I
~ Qf'W I ~ 'I r<<I I -<< ~
I l I I I
'I 1 ~I gg L u
Lire, 2.l r S ZBIrls..u ru. I
~ ~
I' I j i I I
~ I ~
i I I i I i l,I I I
~4I i2!
j i j I
W) CUENT JOB No. SHEET OF SUBJECT Z 0 8 Stevenson and Associates 5 5 A Srrucrurnl Mcchnnrcnl Conrulnnrr Enprnncnnrr fum o
~ ~ ~~ ~
o ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ II e e ~ 0 II I I I I
~ ~ ' ~ ~
~ ~
I'
r vms ~ we'll ~ Q J,g eo ATTACHMENT HO. l Equipaent No.: Anchor types' '.
'li- HE-(4 0 Tightness established by: 0 "Snug VDCY Dia:
Fit" ie"+ 0 Torque
~g Dwg No.:
No.: IL 5L97A-I4 IL M135 2 Torque Wrench No.: Cal. Due Date: Tightness verified? 0 Yes EI No Date: ((-(o- 2 ons c n Equipment hase flexible? 0 Yes K No Date: -(0- l2 ons ruc on ARE Bolt Caps Anchor len Pro~ding len XD
', I '- l l" ~i',- ,
l'-ll"
~" ~
I'-II" p "8," I'-ll" 4iia 'i I'- l l" I'- l I " I
'-
I I" Comments
~m ox~
I'-(I" 1%" 30'73-g 2,' 0 2,'+"
~
Concrete OK OK condition 0(( Ql< QK QK OK Edge gIz" C 'i'." 4 distance
'. Anchor 4 4 acin Q 7 IEI," 3 1/i >~tg" > 'iZ" 4 Anchor 4 4 4 4 larit 0 0 an Thread engagement OlC. OIC.
Zo QK po Ok; .. Ol( 'l( Qk GK Comments: 4 5QRr
'Yean.m. CKo~W A~a, IM T PER RA&I I Z, ~
Verified by: Date: Qua . Cert. nspect r . 5-2.z-)z Reviewed bye Construct on INDIA IA MICHIGAN POVIER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED VlORKING COPY AUG 2 4.1995 Page 2 of Revision l3 LEAK
ATTAU96ÃZ NO. 1 Equipment No.: )Z.-HC -IGM Dug No.: Embedded Steel. Dry. No.: geld y 'Ihfi Wz. Wa l W< VVs Wr W~ Ws I I I I t I Size /~r ~i<. ~i( If~" IS ~i i >li ~/ic. 1 ~ Fillet 2 ~ Plug/slot Lan 5~~ic" 44.'i'z" Z.>a" 5 '~s" 2." Z ~a" L~~s" . E.'~4" 3 ~ Groove Cracks Yea Yea Y s Yea Yes Yea Yea Yea No No No No No No No Lack of Yea Yes Yes . Y Yea Yea Yea Yes Penetration No No N No No No No Porosity Yea No Yes No o s es No. Yea'es No No Yea No Yea No CXlALLTY CQMTRQL TEC W MlC.IAU QLll Y VERIFIE,D 'AE.LDQ 'INS. Vl4, WS. 4 NIo PER COGGTRUCTLOM, AbKHQR REVlEVl E.MCLMEER,'5 RE.QDE.'5 T W+ HA'5 5LAC AND its" POPlTLOM 15 UklKR CUT. Wi Wz WII LJ
? ~~
BIO 6~ O >. Cg
<i-o ~NO QO ~OQ OX- ~@X co o ZO?
O i-Wa 'l L UFV. LK . V/E.GY PAC E l QFK Equipment base flexihles 0 Yea 8 No ons n e Date: Revieyed by Date ons ruc on c or ev ev g eer Verified by: ua ~ ~ npsec or Date: Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
ATTAauKNT No. l Equipment No.: IZ HC IGM %g No.: Embedded Steel Dry. No.: Weld ID Ws VYIo W ii 'lliz Size ~l(c. I
~/I(
1 Wi( l ~ Fillet 5'4 2 ~ Plug/Slot Lan 5 A Z ~s 4.4'i~ 3 ~ Groove Cracks s Yes Yes Yes Yes s Yes o No No No No N No Lack of Yes .Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Penetration o o No No No No No o Porosity Y Y o Yes No Yes No Yes'es No No Yes No Y No We '~s" PQRTIOkl CF VlE.EO )6 UQQE.RC O'T. INDIANA MICHIGAN PO(VER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED
'IVORKING COPY AUG 24 1995 "L ERK T PACE Z.OF5 Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes H. No T' on e Date:
Reviewed by: ons ru o c r evlev g eer Verified by: a . e . npsec or Pago 3 of 3 Revision 3.
ATTACEBKNT No. Equipment No.: 'lh HC )AU Dwg No.: Embedded Steel Dwg. No.: Weld ID V/)s W i~ W is W ic W..)~ W)e Wm W I I I I I size ~/)C +Iso )/s, ~ha- Pi~ )IS ~~Is. 1 ~ Fillet 44'Iz" 2 ~ Plug/Slot Z.'ls" Z'~z" L "e," Z."e" Z.'Iz" Z.'~e" 3 ~ Groove Cracks Yea Yes Yes Yes Yes Yea Yea Yes No No No No No No No No Lack of Yea Yes Yea ,Yes Yea Yea Yea Yea Penetration No No No No No No No No Porosity Yea No Yes No Yes No Yea No Yes'es No No Yes No Yes No WELD'QM 'THI5 PAC E. WC.KE. MOT 'tE.RAFIEO aV a .C.. T~~<~D~- W)+ INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED WORKING COPY
~UG 24 tSSS W)s W) LERK T Equipment base flexible: 0 Yes EL No Date:
ona 0 e Reviewed by: Date: ~-~-~~ ona ruc on c o evxew gxneer Verified by: Date: ua . o . npsec or Page 3 of 3 Revision 1
SHP 5050 NDE.008 S Px A DEPARTMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT COPY NO. UITRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: ~ A REPORT DATE: 9 REQUEST NO. hl IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit a Test Unit/ S/N Component Freq./Diameter Ra Item Reference Standard Material Other Couplant/Batch No. 'g L S TEST DATA REMARKS r 4 Y T A LE SA'F
'T' t A.
F wio PERFORMED BY: W I EVER: DATE: REVIEWED BY: I EVE?: ~ DATE: I FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip ID: 1-QT-107-AB Train: 1 Equip Class:21 Drawing No.: 1-5151A
~ ~ ~
tion:
~ ~ EMERQ DIESEL System: DIESEL FUEL OIL ~
Equip Desc: AB EMERG DXESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Room: AB EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MIN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: AB FUEL OXL DAY TANK MFR: el: 36" D x 108" L, 465 GAL. el: Elem. Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: F Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK (CAPACITY- 2HRS FULL LOAD OPERATION) Iso Drawing: Location: XN THE SW REGION OF THE ROOM INSIDE THE AB EMERGENCY DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK ENCLOSURE,, AT 599 EL.
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 2 ID: 1-QT-107-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L,465 GAL. BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A COh0iggNT!j SRT: George G. Thomas (SM) and Tom Huang (AEP), 10/7/93.
~
Same as 1-QT-107-CD, except that the grout is in much better condition for 1-QT-107-AB.
~
Evaluated by: Date:
/I 9 ~85 ed= /
l e
Attachment:
Pictures I
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 2 ID: 1-QT-107-AB (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== AB EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: AB EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL.
~
~PC~FQ AB Emerg. Diesel Fuel Oil Day Tank 1-QT-1 07-AB
++12 CHP 5021 CCD 019 ~ ~
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 50UTH%E57 5'le QF'@ o,g pM UP w~iCr AUX ) -O AG EMCPGt:M(Y QKSEL T11Q Oll OlE't XLktl( b'i Un Bldg. Location iQ- 369Q i- QT- ia7- A5 Insta at. on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch gl Qil 4e II p4 FfP.)
+I Qll E l E.V. LM. 5QUTH 5y'E.CY1 QD 'A- A" D,rawn by: Q. ROTC, Date:
Verified by: Date: Qua ./Cart. Inspector 2.- 'LS-g g Reviewed by: Date: Construct on Anc r Review Engineer f Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ i ~ ~ l S ~ ~
0 - ~
- ~ ~ ~ ~
s '%~4 l kt.S
&5%~~%aaa ISWISRRRHLL mmeeasmmmm RRE555RRRLL WWWRHaLa ii) aa) kal ggggggggggg~~~~
gggg@gg++QQ
%555%WLLLL 4 4
~ MWWMWWWW k k Pg
I S (% A DEPAiRTMFNT SHP 5050 NDE.QQ8 CONTROLLED DOCUMENT ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COPY NO. ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: gr 1 REQUEST NO. IDENTIFICATION TECHNI UE Unit Test Unit/ S/N Component Frey./Diameter ~ ABC) Item Reference Standard Material Couplant/Batch No.L&p Other TEST DATA REMARKS W6
/7~"
7c' PERFORMED BY: LEVEL:~& DATE: / REVIEMED BY: LEVEL: DATE: FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1. Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Page No. 770 10/19/94 2 21 2-QT-115-CD SYSTEM DIESEL LUBE OIL DESCRIPT CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OXL SUMP TANK DRAWINGNO 2-5151C BUILDXNG AUXILIARY NORMSTATE DESXRSTATE POWERREQD ALIASNO POWERTRAXN NA COMPSERVED CD LUBE OIL SUMP TANK MANUFACTUR MODEL 775GALS PANEL ELEMDWG NOT APPL WIRXNGDWG NOT APPL PWRSOURCE NOT APPL QUALXF NUCLEAR SR WALKDOWN F PFDOPT MIN SUPPSYSDWG REQSUPP EVAL TYPE Seismic Only NOTES FUNCT XON. EDG E'VATION 579.00 KTXON CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT
. Y N P TYPE TANK ISO DWGS DETAIL LOC XN THE WEST PART OF THE PXT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR FLOW PATH S REV 0 REV LOCK N LOCK DATE SHOW INDEX Y / /
TAG N S IGNATURES REV NOTES
Donald C. Cook Niiclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EyALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descn tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS BASIS: Horizontal TANK analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes reater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, N/A vertical tank.
- 5. A rin -t e foundation is not used to su ort a la e, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A IS E UIPMENT SEISMICALLYADE UATE? Yes COMMENTS SRT: W. Djordjevic and TR Satyan Sharma. 10/6/93.
REF: 1. Anchor inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certi".:ed 10/1/93.
¹
- 2. Worthington Dwg 700003BY.
- 3. Worthington Co.Lube Oil Sump Tank Calculation, 8/22/74.
Anchorage: The tank sits on 3 saddles, 2 plates per saddle, 1/4" thick. There are two 3/4" anchors per saddle. There are 4 anchors in total for the tank because the middle saddle has no anchorage on it. Horizontal Tank Analysis: Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Inertia = 2I + 2(ad "2) = 2((36"x0.25in"3)/1 2) + 2(1 8in"2 x (5"2)in"2") = 900in "4. Saddle stresses analyzed in Ref. 3. Nozzle loads judged not significant by SRT. Evaluated by: Date: go U
0 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Uni~ 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
TANK Analysis Results
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Sheet 3 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS PICTURES 2-QT-115-CD
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS TANK Analysis Results Step 1 Input Data a Assum tions
- 1. Tank is c lindrical, horizontall oriented and su orted on saddles. Yes
- 2. Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel Yes
- 3. Saddles are uniforml s aced. Yes
- 4. Saddles overhan is less than s acin /2 Yes
- 5. Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate Yes under the fixed saddle.
- 6. Im osed nozzle loads are not si nificant Yes
- 7. The tank foundation is ade uate Yes
- 8. Anchorbolts are cast in lace or ex ansion t e. Yes b Materials Wei ht of Tank+ Fluid 6.83 ki s Wei ht Densit of Tank+ Fluid 60 Ibs/ft*3 Saddle Elastic Modulus 29000.0 ksi Saddle Shear Modulus 1150.0 ksi Base Plate Yield Stren th 36.0 ksi Anchor T e 3/4 in 90 de . J-Bolts c Dimensions Tank Diameter, D 3.8 ft TankLen th, L 10.0 ft Tank Thickness, t 0.19 in Hei ht of Tank+ Fluid C.G., H 2.08 ft Number of Saddles Saddle S acin, S 7.67 ft Saddle Hei ht, h 2.0 in Saddle Shear cross-sectional area 18.0 in"2 Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Interia 900.0 in"4 Number of Bolt Locations / Saddle Number of Bolts / Boltin Location Extreme Bolt S acin, 2.67 ft Bolt Eccentricit, e D'nchor 0.02 in Weld Thickness 0.19 in Base Plate Thickness 0.25 in
0 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 5 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 - Class: 21 Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP Ti NK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL Pl, - IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS d Anchor Bolts T e = 90 De J-Bolt Diameter= 3/4 in Manufacturer = Product Name = Pullout Shear Nominal Ca acit 15.03ki s 7.51 ki s Concrete Com ression Stren th, fc'= 4000.0 si Reduction Parameters Ca acit Reduction Factor Label Check Condition Pullout Shear
- 1. T e of Anchora e Yes 1.0 1.0
- 2. Installation Ade uac Yes installation is ade uate 1.0 1.0
- 3. Embedment Length Yes Embedment Length = 27.0 0.7 1.0 in
- 4. Ga at Threaded Anchors Yes Ga size = 0.0 in 1.0 1.0
- 5. S acin betweenAnchora es Yes 1.0 1.0
- 6. Edge Distance Yes Edge Distance = 6.0 in 0.41 0.31 Another Edge Distance = 4 in
- 7. Concrete Stren th and Condition Yes 1.0 1.0
- 8. Concrete Crack Location and Size Yes Crack Size = 0.0 in 1.0 1.0
- 9. Essential Relays in Cabinets Yes Essential relays are not 1.0 1.0 resent
- 10. Base Stiffness and P in Action Yes 1.0 1.0
- 11. Equipment Base Strength and Yes Base strength and load path 1.0 1.0 Structural Load Path are O.K.
- 12. Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Installation is O.K. 1.0 Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters? Yes Vu'.344 Step 2 The allowable bolt loads Allowable Tension Load, ki s Shear Load, Pu'llowable 2.346 ki s Step 3 Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor 0.1726
Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Un<<2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri lion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL OIL PIT - IN THE WEST 'UBE PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 775GALS Step 4- Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor RW 0.0379 Step 5 Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads Allowable Anchora e Tension Load, Pu 0."i64ki s Allowable Anchora e Shear Load, Vu 2.346 ki s Step 6 Calculate the ratios and values al ha Pu/Vu 0.07 Wb 1.71 ki s/bolt Vu/Wb 1.37 H /0' 0.779
/S 0.271 2.236 F2 1.779 Step 7 Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage lambda 1 0.614 G lambda u 0.568 G Anchor Acceleration ca acit, lambda 0.568 G Step 8- Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response Maximum Saddle S acin, Sc 14.2 ft Step 9 Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction
0 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant, Unit 2 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 7 of 7 ID: 2-QT-115-CD Rev. 0 Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchan ers Descri tion: CD EMERGENCY DIESEL LUBE OIL SUMP TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 579.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EMER DSL LUBE OIL PIT - IN THE WEST PART OF THE PIT, NEAR THE WEST WALL, 3 FEET ABOVE THE FLOOR Manufacturer Model, Etc.: 775GALS Saddle Stiffness, Ks 10339.067 ki s/in Resonant Fre uenc of Tank in Lon itudinal Direction 121.66 Hz Step 10 Determine the seismic demand acceleration ZPA 0.25 G Tank is rigid in all three directions. Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA Step 11 Check the saddle stresses The program does not check the saddle stresses Check the saddle stresses by an independent calculation ~Summa IS E UIPMENT SEISMICALLYADE UATE'? The tank anchorage is adequate.
*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET ~<' ~
- 6. CD I Unzt Bldg. Location l 2.- 5'2 Iz 2. -QT-) I
- CC Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch I/O". 8 Qp, UYe) bb P,~/X,ID a5-2" 7 DIM G RouT PC% LZ.3241 12- 4, O'4 na
'b I'-Z"(~p 0/4Q 3 604$ ('7$ P)
I/j. R AbSHCR INOIANA MICHIGAN POWE'ITE OKSIGN GONTPQLI.Q)O WOIIKINQ CQPY 0 AUG 271995 LKRK T Drawn by: D.te. Verified by: Date: ua ./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: 8 -+~ +~ Constructs.on An hor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
*~L2 CHP 0023.. CCD. ()] g ATTACHMENT NO l ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHE Unit g &x,gldg.
c.D PIT Locate.on l~- 9 Installation I dwg. / Rev. 2.- a.y - Equipment No. ( t g-CD Anchora e Arran ement Sketch 0 6 CL I CQ p
-- -0 (o" INOIANA MICHIGAN POWER SITE OESIGN CONTROLLEO WORKING COPY AUG 2't 3995 LERK +
7'ate: Drawn by: Date: Q-t 0-gg Verified by: Date: ual.fCert. Inspector Reviewed by: 't ~ Construction A char Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
**12 CHP 5021. CCD. 0 lg ATTACHMENT N(3.
Equipment No.:
~ ~ + @T I< 5 l D Dwg No.: I 2-3Z~t-1
Anchor type: ~ BOL ~ ~Bl Dwg No.: l 2-3qpZg Tightness established by: 0 "Snug Fit" 0 Torque Torque Vrrench No.: Tightness verified? Cl Yes Cl No QA NPI 7 ons ru t,z.on Cal, Due
':
Date: ll ""* Equipment base flexible? 0 Yes 8 No Date: ~ ~D I~ onstruc x n ARE PHYSICAL CHARACTERISTICS Bolt ID Comments Gaps Anchor len th 2-8il '2-I 8 I' l2- Bolas Protruding 5 ~~ ~HOT len th Embedment l 2-3/Ib Bolt fIb~iY< 7((g+l'I~ SC~ ri Concrete C,RhC I( IN CR~ QA.OVT Itl QROV T condition Edge 9~ht" distance @Il<il Anchor 2.- oI s acin <v(c.',AHhl0< Anchor 0 an larit Thread engagement M~SR~ GP-OUT T~~~~< ~ JS Il P JOT'P DOING (SoKaTH H~C C)Sl C?1 &AC 9 ADDING I / T M ~IL FR.OM, OP OF C ROOT. % ACC.~ 55IGL6 gl 4D I "Y&nl 5 >3" >I P 0 AC WP(5l R.CSPGC.TIV Y. Verified by: Date: Qual. /Cert.
~ ~ nspector Reviewed by: T I NOI ANA kt ICHIGAN POWER SITE DESIGN CONTROLLED Date: 8'1 I ~
Construction AUG 27 tS8~ LERK + Page 2 of 3 Revis ion 3
' ' SHP 5050 NDE. 008 8 A DEPARTMENT ATTACFNEVZ NO .
CONTROLLEO DOCUMENT COPY NO. 2 I LTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: i 6 REPORT DATE-' ~ Q REQUEST NO. IDENTIFICATION Unit l ~<3 Test Unit/ S/N Component - 7- l - t 4 Freer./Diameter h Item Reference Standard Material C. S, Couplant/Batch No. Other TEST DATA REMARKS 1&(l~ L w l PERFORMED BY: REVIEWED BY: EZVEI ~ DATE: ~ /7 FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of Revision 0
01/16/92 PG. N0.535 SAFE SHUTDOWN EOUIPHENI'IST (SSELWP) FUNCTION: CCM Equipment Class: 21 Train: 2 Cauiamcnt IO: 1.HE.15E Orawing Nurbert \-5135A 1-5113 Svstcm: CCM Cauip Oescription: CAST CCM HEAT EXCHAHGER Building: AUXILIARY Room: 609 HALLMAY Elevation: 609 wnrmaI state- Oesired state: Po~er Required: M Sort: M, Sunnorting System Drawing Number: oeauired Interconnections and Supporting Components: fety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Nin/Opt 4 HIN ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Al ias Number: Power Train: NA C~nent Served: EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Hanufacturcr: NL'M INOUSTRIES Model t Pahei 4 Elem Orawing: M/A Miring Orawing: N/A Po~er Source: N/A uaILdown: F Relay Only: N Comoonent Type: HE ISO Orawings: Octallcd Location:
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 1 of 6 ID: 1-HE-15E (Rev. 0) - Class: 21 Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MLW INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) BASIS: External analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibility to accommodate the motion of a large, flat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a large, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A IS E UP EN SEIS C L 0 U E? ~Ye C~I~IVIEN S SRT: Gary Thomas, Tom Huang, and Kailash Mahajan on 11/2/93'.
Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger on two reinforced saddles. Anchorage is two 7/8" diameter J bolts. There are 4 1" wedge expansion anchors in one pedestal in the horizontal direction. C.G. of exchanger from the top of the saddle pedestal about 3'. Pedestal concrete in good condition, but can see the grout to concrete interface. Hand calculation was performed for the heat exchanger and the results show that the anchor bolts are adequate and the saddles are safe. Evaluated by: Date: L
Attachment:
Pictures
Attachment:
ANCHORAGE ANALYSIS FOR THE TANK
DC COOK Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 6 ID: 1-HE-15E (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== EAST CCW HEAT EXCHANGER Building: AUXILIARY Floor EI.: 609.00 Room, Row/Col: HALLWAY, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: MLW INDUSTRIES (HORIZONTAL) CTU ES kgb I ONE SADDLE WITH 4 HORIZONTAL BOLTS OTHER SADDLE SUPPORT
CUENT SHEEf OF SUBJECT 0 8 Stevenson and Associates lU K II h Svurtvsal Macha Conaulnnp Cnpmawlnp nial f neo It gfl(
~~o I
2o- 0 3 (gy) x5 8 g 6~a&
<<Ig P(3g'0 P'I ..7ke t. /a.
CUENT JOO No. SHEET Ft OF SUOJECT
~ Ah~rto>
Stevenson and Associates A Sicuniucni llsolsnnionl i-H tea 5l ConculnnSI EnqsnsucsnFI Fsc su I I i . i S. E.gojs, 'TbM. X<'fnlg] .. o. I (.QM ..~6OI'; kx) it:.: I ' I ~, . ~ c s I ~ ' I IF p ..-Qn I
~ ~
i,* ~, s s C i 51cuC40'f
~.l cn I
I ~ ' >el ty . Z-s~
~ s r
w.o~ ~p.b'.=, A>(.oo gg T.WS ..SS.:=.~ , . 1.3.'gi
. = ISI s TS/'S I ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~.g>~~A.. l'i<</g.n~g~ ~ ~ ~
l'~2. M xS~ y3 z 5'. ly 4.)oscs
~O Vn'. Ess'J I .I z zgh) ., ~(+ i.l~s) c}-.
K7$ (f 7qOD'), gQ ~ .87ESC +'7. O .O) cital 2 ~$ ,27S) +qboIS
.I, ~
I J... 3
',.'c,l~ nV ~ I' * ~
FE~ 4 2 '6 sun
- 4. ~ << I ~ ~
i I Jl 2CIC?.l, '., = '8 8 VS ii,7 c D .'.,6): WSITSI II
. ~ ']9, 8 O'CW I ~ F I s
I ~ I I s ~ I s iI"7."2.>;"F"",Z, S/< 356 'I;
~
I~: s I ~ I I i I ~ I I I ~
-s ~
J ~ 'I
) I I * ~
CLIENT SHEET OF
~ f~ > " 'KO cr p g
Stevenson and Associates S A,QIOg~io( r.'TE A Srrncrvrnl hlcchcnrccl Consnlrlnp Enprnccrrnp Flrrn T'yY'
$ K$ .tv'4 40(.$ $
l0( gxd
~ E.-.4CQ <4C >~4J(LE:k. "'-
o5
~,q '
( <<j 3xAo f p
~ ...'.,o-ro ~.yy-y.+ t - lg .
lg =.+.oc ...:.3'.+6 .=.Io8
~
5 X 3 37 3' E. g g ( l 5) 2- 'ZT I P TS
CLIENT sHEET ~ o Stcvcnson and Associates 0 A Srrucrurel hlechenreel Cnnsulrrng Engrneenng Frrnr I o,g75g VP //ader'< = i 7y344
= 2Zjyoo glOE.
2 Jr zI ~ 2 75 )t', gg y ~ g . ( g 1I ) Z 3 Z. 6 5
.J
- f. nl ~~H~ ~ Hg
" 'tSZ.lS Z7 SoS .+/ .I Z~~
o8 (C <<)'~ E 6) (I SS)'f,
.SIPED 7.S)j' Se 7 77- ( rlr I "g)I'-S r'e o.y 3 Z..$ -.
7 7Z Ts '27SX 2f go c ~ 1 Z III ~ 3 Z(
~z V'~ S.fT..
**12 CHP 5021 ~ CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET @AU MA Unzt g Bldg. Location 1- H~ -isG Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch I- RE- 'I5F PcQRGWA,c PZDE5t&a 4 a 0 0 T>~ a ~ 4
" Z-'vcr cl "jg li"I Ihtlh MiCHIGAN POWER (vxP)
CO STRUC IO."I COI': ROLLEO
~'r'ORKI AG COPY f'UG1 ( ]quip 0'rawn by: Date: /D Verified by: Date:
Q~ l-/Cert. Xnspector Reviewed by: structxon Anchor Review Engineer Date: X/7 z. Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
"*12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Un1t 0 Bldg. Location F- / >
Installation dwg. Rev. Equipment No. Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
<I I
3 II il
)5 -a ~ /i~ - I'/g 'x INDIA%'i I8!CtOGAI'I POlVEI OiISTBlICTIO".I CO.'ITROLL 'ViOlIKii'IGCOPY P,UG l 7 19gr CL RK Drawn by:
Uerified by: Qu ./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ '
+*12 CHP 5021. CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt 0 Bldg. Location -I L" Installation dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch ll 0-'9 O-S1i o 4'Nr:4'<I l,!CHIGA!<
.!!r~ .0! nnP "i'0".K.'."<G CGPY P0'ON'rr;;C r~
C A
~
II 4 L Cicv. Ui- Vo GK lQ 00 Y' rawn by: Verified by: Date: 4>- )2 Q l./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: onstructzon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
0
'+12 CHP 5021.CCD.019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ANCHOR INSPECTION DATA SHEET Unxt 4 Bldg. Location Zl E- eE Installatz.on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch
-HE-i goal ~F 4oLH Imhusg V~e) or' 0 rr + O 0 y~
Ei . Uicu ll'(~'lbi/. V.i(::-'IGA'i PO'Q CQNGTR~.'"."IG:< C.l":.i: RG .LED AUG j. 7 8,"'> CL'n~( 0o Q- Pt< 0-9 O~ 0 V +< D ELEv. 48.& UookiAe 0 H Drawn by: Date: to l Verified by: Date: P -~/u > Q al./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: Date: onstructxon Anchor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
~ ~ ~ e ~ t ~ )a ) ~ ~ ~ ~
ti ~ ~
~ - ~ ) ~ ~ ~ '1~4 gQ+Q~gig~~~~
kRWWWKHEL mmmmmHHLL RSRSmmRRSL IR555m55LLLS RSWRIRHRRLS RSW K%%5 .. RRWWWW
~ HLLLL MWWREWW&W %%55WRIHR RSRRRSRRLL R%8%8%RRMMW&
MWWWWMWW sl ~ !
~ I~ C Iu ~a >>Bl kl>> ~
al z& ~ ~ its
H
) ~ r ~ ~ t ' ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ r I r ~
iaL a ~ s. ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ - ~ 0~ '( ~e~ ~ ..t ia..'. ~r 1 ~ 4 ~ r~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~-
t 0 555%5%%%%LL RSR55%mHHLS 55Ã%8NNLLLL WISNRRRKLL RWWSWLLLL RIRSSRRLELE RRRWRWW RSWRWELLL RSWWQLEEL R%R%RSRWMMWW MW&WWW&&
~ ~ a. 0 ~ l 1 A 1 a a gh A.. s OJ r ~ IL ~ ~
5 ~ ~ saaJ >LkL ' err
/5I I i Ji4 4A L ~ ~ ~
f
Equipment No.: Tightness established by "Snug Pit" 7 Tightness verified by: -c Qual. /Cert. Inspector Comments:
12 SHP 5050 NCE.OOG
/w uEPARTPAENI ATTACHMENT NO. 1 CONTROLLED OOCUMEHT coPYI'-. 9 I ULTRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO ~ : ~$ REPORT DATE: 2 REQUEST NO.
IDENTIFICATION Unit Test Unit/ S/N ifj Component Freq./Diameter Item Reference Standard Material C.S Cocuplant/Batch No. Other TEST DATA REMARKS ll~ V II r/" II /I A PERFORMED BY: LEVEL:~ DAT<: REVIEWED BY: ~- DATE: I'EVEL: FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
Equip ID: 1-QT-107-CD . Train: 2 Equip Class:21 Drawing No.: 1-5151C
~ ~
nction:
~
EMERG DIESBL System: DXESEL FUEL OXL
~
Equip Desc: CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OXL DAY TANK Building: AUXILXARY Room: CD EMERG DIESEL GENERATOR ROOM Elev: 587 Sort: S, Notes: Normal State: Desired State: Power Req'd: N Support System Drawing: Req'd Support Comp: Safety Related Status: NUCLEAR SR Min/Opt: MXN Alias No: Power Train: NA Comp Served: CD FUBL OXL DAY TANK MPR: Model: 36" D x 108" L, 465 GAL. ": El em. Drawing: N/A Wiring Drawing: N/A Power Source: N/A Walkdown: P Relay Eval : N Comp Type: TANK (CAPACITY - 2 HRS PULL LOAD OPERATION) Xso Drawing: Location: XN THE NW REGXON OP THE ROOM, 10 FEET NW OP THE GEN END OP DGCD INSIDE THE FUEL OXL DAY TANK ENCLOSURE, AT THB 599 EL.
DC Cook Unit1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet1 of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x108 L,465 GAL. BASIS: Horizontal TANK analysis
- 1. The buckling capacity of the shell of a large, fiat-bottom, vertical tank is equal to or greater N/A than the demand.
- 2. The capacity of the anchor bolts and their embedments is equal to or greater than the Yes demand.
- 3. The capacity of connections between the anchor bolts and the tank shell is equal to or Yes greater than the demand.
- 4. Attached piping has adequate flexibilityto accommodate the motion of a large, fiat-bottom, Yes vertical tank.
- 5. A ring-type foundation is not used to support a targe, flat-bottom, vertical tank. N/A D T 7 SRT: George G. Thomas (SB A) and Tom Huang (AEP) 10/7/93.
REF: 1. Anchor Inspection Data Sheets: Anchorage Arrangement Sketches and Physical Characteristics Data Sheet, Certified 4/5/93.
- 2. Worthington Dwg it/ 700006BU
- 3. Worthington Co. Fuel Oil Day Tank Calculation, 8/1 //74.
Anchorage: 1-QT-107-CD is a horizontal tank which sits on 2 saddles. Each saddle has 2, 1/4" thick plates, forming a "U", with no gussets. There are 2 - 5/8" anchors per saddle. Cracks in the leveling grout on the concrete pad were identified. The SRT judged this acceptable since the structural concrete pads are intact. Horizontal Tank Analysis: Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Inertia = 2I + 2(ad*2) = 2((30"x0.25in"3)/1 2) + 2(15in"2 x (4"2)in"2") = 480in"4. Results of Horizontal Tank Analysis show tank anchorage is adequate (conservatively using expansion bolts for the 5/8" diameter Nelson Stud anchors), and Ref. 3 calculation contains saddle stresses check. Interactions: Block wall has been confirmed by AESPC to have been evaluated in the IE 80-11 program. Evaluated by: Date: I l /Z ~! eW
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 2 of 6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L,465 GAL.
Attachment:
TANK Analysis Results
DC Coo4; Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 3of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 Dx108 L,465GAL. TANK Analysis Results Step 1 Input Data a) Assumptions
- 1. Tank is cylindrical, horizontally oriented and supported on saddles. Yes
- 2. Tank and saddles are made of carbon steel Yes
- 3. Saddles are uniformly spaced. Yes
- 4. Saddles overhang is less than spacing /2. Yes
- 5. Base plates have slotted anchor bolt holes for thermal growth except for the base plate under Yes the fixed saddle.
- 6. Imposed nozzle loads are not significant. Yes
- 7. The tank foundation is adequate. Yes
- 8. Anchor bolts are cast in place or expansion type. Yes b) Materials Weight of Tank + Fluid 4.5 kips Weight Density of Tank+ Fluid 70.7 Ibs/ft"3 Saddle Elastic Modulus 29000.0 ksi Saddle Shear Modulus 1150.0 ksi Base Plate Yield Strength 36.0 ksi Anchor Type 5/8 in Expansion Bolts c) Dimensions Tank Diamete; D 3.03 ft Tank Length, L 9.0 ft Tank Thickness, t 0.19 in Height of Tank+ Fluid C.G., Hcg 1.71 ft Number of Saddles Saddle Spacing, S 6.0 ft Saddle Height, h 2.38 in Saddle Shear cross-sectional area 15.0 in"2 Saddle Weak Axis Moment of Interia 480.0 in"4 Number of Bolt Locations / Saddle Number of Bolts / Bolting Location Extreme Bolt Spacing, 2.1? ft Bolt Eccentricity, e D'nchor 6.0 in Weld Thickness 0.19 in Base Plate Thickness 0.19 in
DC Cook Unit1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 4 of 6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x108 L,465 GAL. d) Anchor Bolts Type = Expansion Anchor Diameter = 5/8 in Manufacturer = Phillips Stud (S) Product Name = Pullout Shear Nominal Capacity 3.17 kips 3.79 kips Concrete Compression Strength, fc' 3500.0 psi Reduction Parameters Capacity Reduction Factor Label Check Condition Pullout Shear
- 1. Type of Anchorage Yes 1.0 1.0
- 2. Installation Adequacy Yes Installation is adequate 1.0 1.0
- 3. Embedment Length Yes Embedment Length = 2.38 1.0 1.0 in
- 4. Gap at Threaded Anchors Yes Gap size = 0.0 in 1.0 1.0
- 5. Spacing between Anchorages Yes 1.0 1.0
- 6. Edge Distance Yes Edge Distance = 6.25 in 1.0 1.0
- 7. Concrete Strength and Condition Yes 0.88 1.0
- 8. Concrete Crack Location and Size Yes Crack Size = 0.0 in 1.0 1.0
- 9. Essential Relays in Cabinets Yes Essential relays are not 1.0 1.0 present
- 10. Base Stiffness and Prying Action Yes 1.0 1.0
- 11. Equipment Base Strength and Yes Base strength and load path '<.0 1.0 Structural Load Path are O.K.
- 12. Embedment Steel and Pads Yes Installation is O.K. 1.0 1.0 Does the tank satisfy all the assumptions and is within the applicable range of parameters?
Vu'.774 Step 2 The allowable bolt loads Allowable Tension Load, kips Shear Load, Pu'llowable 3.79 kips Step 3 Determine base plate bending strength reduction factor RB 0.1562
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS} Status: Yes Sheet5of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
Description:
CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL. Step 4 Determine base plate weld strength reduction factor RW 17.7858 Step 5 Determine the anchorage tension and shear allowable loads Allowable Anchorage Tension Load, Pu 0.433 kips Allowable Anchorage Shear Load, Vu 3.79 kips Step 6 Calculate the ratios and values alpha (Pu/Vu} 0.11 1.13 kips/bolt Vu /Wb 3.37 Hcg / 0.788 D'cg/S 0.285 2.236 F2 1.804 Step 7- Determine the acceleration capacity of the tank anchorage lambda 1 1.507 lambda u G G'.715 Anchor Acceleration capacity, lambda 0.715 G Step 8 - Determine the maximum saddle spacing for transverse and vertical rigid frequency response Maximum Saddle Spacing, Sc 13.42 ft Step 9 Compute the resonant frequency of the tank in the longitudinal direction Saddle Stiffness, Ks 7230.98 kips/in Resonant Frequency of Tank in Longitudinal Direction 125.34 Hz
DC Cook Unit 1 GIP Rev 2, Corrected, 2/14/92 SCREENING EVALUATIONWORK SHEET (SEWS) Status: Yes Sheet 6 of6 ID: 1-QT-107-CD (Rev. 0) Class: 21 - Tanks and Heat Exchangers
== Description:== CD EMERG DIESEL FUEL OIL DAY TANK Building: AUXILIARY Floor El.: 587.00 Room, Row/Col: CD EDG RM, Manufacturer, Model, Etc.: 36 D x 108 L, 465 GAL. 4 Step 10 Determine the seismic demand acceleration ZPA 0.25 G Tank is rigid in all three directions. Tank anchorage is adequate because anchorage acceleration capacity is greater than ZPA Step 11 Check the saddle stresses The program does not check the saddle stresses Check the saddle stresses by an independent calculation 5mamaw IC The tank anchorage is adequate.
Coo Component No. i QT- l 0"( -( i) Claaa IIEIUll Any pazticularprea the Seismic Review Teaa should pay axtra attention to1 Yes No ~ (Xf yea, check items that apply.) Anchor Type Anchor Diameter Anchor Spacing Anchor Number Anchor Embedment Anchor Edge Distance Anchor Gap Anchor Thread Engagement Anchor Grip Anchor Angularity Concrete Crack Others (describe bri.efly) If there ia concern for Design Basis Discrepancy, circle the applicable item and explain.
- l. Hardvaro Maintenance Type Discrepancy
- 2. .rawing Update Type Discrepancy
- 3. Significant Operability/Design Basis Discrepancy
- 4. Others Condition:
! 'oo!6 Actions Taken:
Jog~ peaparad By T'~~co Dace 4'+ ~ ~
"*12 CHP 5021.'CCD. 019 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 TVE. Moli>tH 5F'~. QP "C D" D~~ .CCi-'P IMSLQE IHE. TUEL OlL W.Y fh'tW-Bldg. Locatxon IZ..>> 890 Insta at on dwg. / Rev. Equipment No.
Anchora e Arran ement Sketch j'j4 5~a Ql Q/I EEEV. 4K&. MQR'TH APR D 5 19S LEIIK~Q FACE'~ W C,Rg8 (TVF Drawn by: d. RQ~IL Date: Verified by: Date: Qua ./Cert. Inspector Reviewed by: T o.~l~ Date: Construction chor Review Engineer Page 1 of 3 Revision 1
0
~ g ~
f y ~ i +Jl ~ > e e ~
~ ~ ~ 'i ~ ~ t ~ ~ ~ ~ - li e 'l~l I. ~ - s.~ r t L.S e ~ R%K~SWKiRWWWW .
1 0 0 0 RRRSRSRS
~ ~
WWHHHHQL 88558LL55 e ~
~ ~
WII~WHL HHI%55%L 5 8 RESRE5555RWW&& 55RRRRHRilN I 5%5%i% 6%5%5%RSMMRaIR
- %SIN MWWMWWWW h 0 J l l' a1 ~ ~ ~ ~
SHP 5050 NDE-008 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 UI.TRASONIC TEST REPORT JOB ORDER NO.: REPORT DATE: g7 5 REQUEST NO. A IDENTIFICATION Unit Test Unit/ S/N Component Freq./Diameter ~ Item Reference Standard Material Couplant/Batch No. Other TEST DATA REMARKS
~ 7D . 7$ "
PERFORMED BY: LEVEL: W DATE: / REVIEWED BY: I EVEE' DATE: FORM NO. 12 SHP 5050 NDE.008-1 Page 1 of 1 Revision 0
ATTACHMENT6 TO AEP:NRC:1040E SAMPLE LARS CALCULATIONS 001, 005, 010, 011, 022, 023, 027 AND 030 RAI ITEM 8
This attachment contains thc following:
- 1. A 16 page document containing thc proccdurcs, input data, and rcfcrcnccs used in the Limited Analytical Reviews.
- 2. The rcqucsted Limited Analytical Rcvicws: LAR IIs 001,005,010,011,022,023,027 and 030.
- 3. Thc calculation used to resolve the outlicr gcncratcd by LAR 022.
- 4. The proccdurc used to address the outlier gcneratcd by LAR 005.
'I k
PROCEDURES, INPUT DATA, AND REFERENCES USED IN THI: I,IMnZDANAI,VSIS azmm S
- 3. LIMITEDANALYTICALREVIEWS 3.1 Problem Statement This Limited Analytical Review (LAR), performed within the scope of Unresolved Safety issue (USI) A46, evaluates the structural integrity of cable tray and conduit supports which have been chosen as representative, worst case examples of the major different types of raceway support configurations within D.C.Cook Nuclear Power Plants 1 and 2. Twenty nine sample supports have been chosen from the plant raceway support systems for evaluation.
3.2 Summary of Results The critical interaction value and related comments for each of the raceway support evaluations in this LAR are summarized in Table 3.1 below. Refer to the Attachments to this section for details of each of the evaluations. D. C. Cook A46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-1
Table 3.1 Critical Interaction Values Interaction Value LAR No. Members/Connections Anchorage Maximum 001 0.18 DL 0.68 3DL 0.68 3DL
~ ee 002 003 0.50 OL 0.48 DL 0.50 DL 004 0.29 DL (LOW) ... ~,'e<'ew e<
OL 0.29 DL K":005."j!:.:::::-'i~ <@FOP'<g~ e~~c'~p; 'e""w,'5'~< gxQD<p,%:e ItgQLKI 006 0.50 DL 0.76 3DL 0.76 30L 007 0.81 DL 0.56 3DL 0.81 DL 008 0.94 DL 0.33 DL 0.94 DL 009 0.85 LL LL 0.85 LL 010 1.05 DL 0.43 DL 1.05 OL 011 0.28 LL 1.02 LL 1.02 LL 012 0.15 DL 0.45 DL 0.45 DL 013 0.72 OI 0.58 LL 0.72 DL 014 0.38 DL 0.93 30L 0.93 30L 015 0.84 DL 0.32 LL 0.84 OL 016 0.79 LL 0.40 LL 0.79 LL 017 0.70 DL 0.31 30L 0.70 DL 018 0.72 DL 1.04 3DL 1.04 30L 019 0.33 DL 0.33 DL 020 0.18 DL 0.67 DL 0.67 DL 021 low DL 0.22 DL 0.22 DL O'D,L"':k 023 0.77 DL 0.90 DL 0.90 DL 024 0.25 DL 0.10 OL 0.25 OL 025 0.55 LL 0;23 LL 0.55 LL
*1 ~
026 027 0.75 DL 0.96 30L 0.96 30L 028 0.14 DL low 0.14 DL
~ e*
029 030 low DL low DL low DL 031 0.12 DL 0.20 DL 0.19 DL 032 0.68 DL 0.24 DL 0.68 DL DL Dead Load 30L 3x Dead Load (Vertical Load Check) LL Lateral Load Check RF Rod Fatigue Check ~f'i~/'::':: Qellier
*** Not used.
D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 Page 3-2
i i m f a Tr v I i Logic diagrams indicating the evaluation path taken to demonstrate the acceptance of each of the raceway supports are shown below. Note that the particular evaluation path taken for the support in question is defined in heavy outline. LAR Nos. 003, 004, 008, 010, 012, 019, 020, 021, 023, 024, 030, 031, 032 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Eccentricities ~ t.0 x OL? Yes 8.3.1 Yes Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling?
+No 8.3.7 Yes Floor mounted? ; Ho 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity ~ 3.0 x OL?
Yes 8.3.3 8.3.4 No Does the Supped Have Ductile Does the Support Have Adequate l Response to Lateral Loading? Lateral Load Strength '? Yes Yes 8.3.5 8.3.5 Yes tfo Is the Support a Fixed- End Rod Hanger?
~
Does the Support Pass the Fatigue Evaluation? Yes Pass Analytical Outlier Review (Rigid Mount) D. C. Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-3
LAR Nos. 005, 022 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have No With Eccentricities ) Vertical Dead Load Capacily 1.0 x OL? 8.3.1 Yes Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling7 8.3,7 Yes Floor mounted? No 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity -,. 3.0 x DL? Yes 8.3.3 I 8.3.4 No Does the Support Havo Ductile Does the Support Have Adequate I Response lo Lateral Loading? Lateral Load Strength 7 Yes Yes 8.3.5 8.3.5 Yes Is the Support a Fixed - End Does the Supporl Pass tho Rod Hanger 7 Fatigue Evaluation 7 Yes No
.V...
1 Pass Analytical Outlier Review (Any support failing OL) D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3A
LAR Nos. 009, 011, 016, 025 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity W~th Eccentricities ~ 1.0 x Dt.? Yes 8.3.1 Yes Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling? No 8,3.? Yes Floor mounted? l No I 8.3.2 Does the Support Have VeicaIG pocky 30xDL2 l Yes 8.3.3 8,3.4 Does the Support Have Ouctge Does the Support Have Adequate Response to Lateral Loading '7 Lateral Load Strength? Yes Yes 8.3.5 8.3.5 Yes Is Ihe Supporl a Fixed - End Does the Support Pass the Rod Hanger? Fatigue Evaluation '? Yes Pass Analytical Outlier Review (Floor Mounted Support) j D. C. Cook AAG Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-5
LAR Nos. 014, 028 START 8.3.1 Does thc Support Havo No Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Ecccntricities ~ 1.0 x DL '? Yes 8.3.1 Ycs Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiting? No 8.3.7 Yes Floor rnounted2 No 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity ~ 3.0 x OL 2 Ycs 8.3.3 8.3.4 No Does the Support Have Ductile Does thc Support Have Adequate Response to Lateral Loading 7 Lateral Load Strenglh 7 Yes Ycs 8.3.5 8.3,5 Yes Is lhe Support a Fixed ~ End Does the Support Pass thc Rod Hanger '? Fatigue Evaluation? Yes Pass Analytical Outlier Review (Trapeze Frames) D. C. Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-6
LAR Nos. 001, 006, 007, 017, 018, 027 START 8.3.1 Does the Support Have No With Eccentricities ) Vertical Dead Load Capacity 1.0 x DL '? Yes 8.3.1 Yes Directly mounted Io or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiling? 8.3.7 Floor mounted? Does the Support Kavo Vertical Capacity ~ 3 o x OL? Yes 8.3.3 8.3.4 Does tho Support Have Ductile Does the Support Havo Adequate Response to Lateral Loading '? Lateral Load Strength 7 Yes Yes 8.3.5 8.3.5 Yes Is the Support a Fixed - End Does tho Support Pass tho Rod Hanger? Fatigue Evaluation? I Yes No Pass Analytical Outger Review (Rod Hanger Trapezes) D. C. Cook A46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-7
LAR Nos. 013, 015 START 8.3,1 Does the Support Have Vertical Dead Load Capacity With Eccentricities ~ I.O x DL 7 Yes 8.3.1 Yes Directly mounted to or rigidly cantilevered from an adjacent structural wall or ceiting? 8.3.? Yes Floor mounted? 8.3.2 Does the Support Have Vertical Capacity 3.0 x OL '? Yes 8.3.3 8.3.4 No Does the Support Have Ouctige Does the Support Have Adequate Response to Lateral Loading 7 Load Strength 2 'ateral Yes Yes 8.3.5 8.3.5 Yes Is the Support a Fixed - End Does the Support Pass the Rod Hanger 7 Faligue Evaluabon? Yes No Pass Analytical
/ Review Outlier (Floor to Ceiling Supports)
D. C. Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-8
3.3 Method of Solution Hand calculations are performed employing the methodology outlined in Section 8 of Reference 3.6.4, "Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP) for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment.",Support structures are broken down, where applicable, into subsections which lend themselves to common, closed form solutions for structures subjected to static loading. 3.4 Allowables and Assumptions The following is a compilation of allowable stress and load criteria used throughout the raceway support evaluations. strength of 36 ksi. AISC Specification allowables for Allowable Stress Design (Ref. 3.6.1) are used for the dead load analysis. For other analyses, the allowable stress is increased to 0.9 Fy = 32.4 ksi. J2.5 of Ref. 3.6.1, is 0.3 x 60 = 18 ksi for dead load analysis. For all other analyses, 1.7 x 0.3 x 60 = 30.6 ksi is used. i: Dimensions, properties, and allowables use'd to analyze various Unistrut support system components are based on the Manufacturer's Catalog Data provided in Refs. 3.6.2 and 3.6.3. These values are used for the dead load analysis and all other analyses. Values for Unistrut components commonly used at D.C.Cook are summarized below: Unistrut bending moment: Ref. 3.6.3, p.23 P1000: 5080 in-Ib (allowable bending stress of 25 ksi) Channel nuts/bolts Ref. 3.6.3, p.69 5/8": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 2500 Ib 5/8": slip in P1000 or P3000: 1500 Ib 1/2": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 2000 Ib 1/2": slip in P1000 or P3000: 1500 Ib 3/8": pullout in P1000 or P3000: 1000 Ib 3/8": slip in P1000 or P3000: 800 Ib Bolts are assumed tightened to manufacturer's recommended values r I: D.C. Cook embedded channels are Unistrut P1000 (or equivalent) , galvanized, 12 ga. channels with a material yield strength = 33 ksi, modilied by the addition of 3/8 $ x 4"L Nelson Studs at 12" o.c. Results of tests of modified channels (Ref 3.6.20) indicate a minimum pullout capacity of 6400 lb/ft. The mode of failure was ripping of strut material around the stud; stud remaining in concrete. Using the AISC Allowable Stress Design allowable shear stress of 0.4 x Fy = 13.2 ksi on a 45'one shaped slip surface results in an allowable pullout of 13.2 ksi x n x (D + t) x t = 13.2 x 3.14 x (0.375 + 0.105) x 0.105" = 2090 Ib, therefore use the standard catalog value of 2000 Ib, but not more than the allowable value for pullout of Unistrut channel nuts/bolts as listed above. For all other load cases, use an allowable stress of 1.7 x 0.4 x Fy resulting in an allowable pullout of 3550 Ib, but not more than the catalog allowable value for the pullout of Unistrut channel nuts/bolts as listed above. D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-9
To summarize: Pullout of embedded strut: 2000 Ib 5/8" channel nuVbolt (dead load analysis) 2000 Ib 1/2" channel nut/bolt 1000 Ib 3/8" channel nut/bolt Pullout of embedded strut: 2500 Ib 5/8" channel nut/bolt (all other analyses) 2000 Ib 1/2" channel nut/bolt 1000 Ib 3/8" channel nut/bolt Concentrated loads may not be spaced closer than 12" apart unless the sum total of concentrated loads on any 12" of Unistrut length does not exceed the single load allowable. Reference 3.6.14, will be used unless noted otherwise within the individual LAR's. 1/2" 1.1 Ib/ft 3/4" 1.3 Ib/ft II 1 2.0 Ib/ft 1-1/2" 3.5 Ib/ft II 2 4.9 Ib/ft 3 II 11.1 Ib/ft 4ll 16.6 Ib/ft wide by 6" high) is 25 pounds per linear foot, unless noted otherwise within the individual LAR's. h I: Concrete anchor bolt allowables used in alf analyses are based on Tables C.2-1 and C.2-2 of the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4. The anchor bolt type must be known to use the maximum values. If anchor bolts are'identified as "non-shell" type anchors on the PASS, then, per Ref. 3.6.12, the anchors are either 5/8" Hilti "Kwik-Bolts"or 5/8" Phillips wedge-type anchors. All other anchors must be identified on the PASS or they will be considered "unknown." Unknown anchors require a reduction factor of 0.6 on the allowable toads provided in Ref. 3.6.4, Tables C.2-1 and C.2-2. All concrete anchors, known or unknown, shell or non-shell type, which are not loaded in tension by dead weight, require an additional reduction factor of 0.75 for the "Reduced Inspection Alternative", and, because one third of the anchor bolts (there must be a minimum of six) must be assumed to be "not available", another reduction factor of 0.67 must be taken. The design concrete strength at D. C. Cook is 3500 psi. This requires a reduction factor of 0.875 to be applied to the pullout capacity of all anchors. No reduction is required for the shear capacity. If a tightness check has been performed, it will be so stated on the PASS and the "Reduced Inspection Alternative" reduction factors may be waived. ' D. C. Cook A<6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 Page 3-10
r n or I To summarize:
"Known" concrete anchors such as 5/8" Hilti "Kwik-Bolts", 5/8" Phillips Wedge-type, or 5/8" Phillips Red Head "self drills":
Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.8T5 x 0.75 x 0.67= 1.39 kips (not in tension by deadweight) Vali = 3.79 kips x 0.75 x 0.67= 1.90 kips Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.875 = 2.77 kips (in tension by deadweight) Vali = 3.79 kips I All other 5/8" concrete anchors: Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.83 kips (not in tension by deadweight) Vali = 3.T9 kips x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67= 1.14 kips Pall = 3.17 kips x 0.875 x 0.6 = 1.66 kips (in tension by deadweight) Vali = 3.79 kips x 06 = 228 kips All 3/4" concrete anchors: Pall = 4.69 x 0.875. x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 1.23 kips (not in tension by deadweight) Vali = 5.48 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 1.65 kips Pall = 4.69 x 0.&'F5 x 0.6 = 2.46 kips (in tension by deadweight) Vali = 5.48 x 0.6 = 3.29 kips All 1/2" concrete anchors: Pall = 2.29 x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.60 kips .(not in tension by deadweight) Vail = 2.38 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.72 kips Pall = 2.29 x 0.875 x 0.6 = 1.20 kips (in tension by deadweight) Vali = 2.38 x 0.6 = 1.43 kips All 3/8" concrete anchors: Pall = 1.46 x 0.875 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.39 kips (not in tension by deadweight) Vali = 1.42 x 0.6 x 0.75 x 0.67 = 0.43 kips Pall = 1.46 x 0.875 x 0.6 = 0.77 kips (in tension by deadweight) Vall=142x06=085kips Shear-tension interaction limitations per the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4, Section C.2.11 will be used to evaluate the effect of combined anchor bolt loading. D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 Page 3-11
3.5 input Data The hangers evaluated in this calculation were selected by the Seismic Review Team (SRT) that performed the raceway walkdown. The selections are documented in the Plant Area Summary Sheets (PASS), which are part of the project documentation. Pl ei i Horizontal seismic accelerations are required for the Lateral Load Evaluation and the Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluations as defined in the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4. Three options are presented in the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4, Section 8.3.4 for determining the horizontal seismic acceleration to be used in lateral load evaluations. Acceleration values for D.C.Cook corresponding to each of the options are summarized below. Elevation ZPA Building Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 587 0.20 Aux 1.21 0.63 0.94 633 0.22 Aux 1.21 0.69 0.94 650 0.22 Aux 1.21 0.69 0.94 609 0.22 DGB 1.21 0.69 0.94 598 0.32 Cont 1.21 1.00 0.94 612 0.37 Cont 1.21 1.16 0.94 625 0.42 Cont 1.21 1.31 0.94 651 0.52 Cont 1.21 1.63 0.94 699 0.80 Cont 1.21 2.50 2.50 Option 1: 2g scaled by the maximum of SSE/Bounding Spectrum (ZPA value controls) Option 2: 2.5*1.25'Floor ZPA (1.25 is for 'realistic'loor spectra) Option 3: 2.5'1.25 1.5'SSE ZPA (within 40'f grade)
== Conclusion:== Option 2 for Aux and DGB, Option 3 for Containment D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-12
0 The rod fatigue bounding spectra provided in the GIP, Ref. 3.6.4, Figure 8-9, are plotted below vs. the envelope of the D.C.Cook 5% damping spectra for the Auxiliary Building and the envelope for Containment at El. 650'nd below. These curves are used to determine the applicable bounding curve in the Fatigue Evaluation Screening Charts, Figure 8-10 to 8-14 of the GIP. 20 I s ~ ss I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I sl I I I II 1.5 I I I I I I I I I'I'r I I I I IN
~ ~
I III'I I I I 1 I N I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I I I I I I I I I 1.0 I I I I I I I ~ ssl I 111 I I I g I I I I I I I I I ~ s I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 111 I, I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 111 0.5 I I I r I rr I I I is 1 I I yl
~ -rrrrI I I I f
I I I
-I rrr I I I //
1 I 1 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
'I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s I
~ ~
gl II I 111 I I I I
~11 I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I 11 I I II I I I I
~ I I I
I I I I I
~ ~ ~ I I I I ~ I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I
~ ~
I I I r I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 0.1 10 F~(Hz) 20 6508AdbctoA) I I I s s II ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 1.5 H I I I I I I I I I I I I SS' I I H I I I
~
I
~
II
~
I I I I I I I I I SSI I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I s I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I) I I I ~ I I I I I I ss I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ I I I I I I I I 1.0 I 1 I I I I I I rrrr I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
'I I -rrrs I I I J I I I 1
I I I I I I I I rrr I I I I I I I I I I>I I 11 111 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
~
I I I I I I I I I I I II I I I I I I I I I I I III I I ~ ' ls I I I I I I
~
I I I I I I I I I I I I I~I I I I III
~ I I I
I I I I I I I I 111 0.5 I I
~
I I I
~
I I I I I
~
I
~
III / I
~ I I s s I I s I I
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I I I ~ I I I I I I s
~
I I I s I I s~s II I I I
~ ~
I I I
~ II I ~ 339 I
I I I I
~
11
~ I ~
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II III I I I I I I-
~ s ~ ~ ~
I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ I 0 0.1 10 Frequency (H ) ( D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-13
i vl in r nn Po r All threaded rods used in raceway supports at O.C.Cook are manufactured all-thread rods. Some rods, however, are anchored using the welded rod coupler detail shown to the right. The SRT was concerned that the coupler material is not as ductile as the rod material, particularly after being welded. 2. Fatigue tests were performed on O.C.Cook threaded rods with the welded rod coupler detail (Ref.3.6.23). These tests show that for the same ductilitydernand, the number of cycles to failure using the welded coupler detail is approximately half the number of cycles to failure using typical "nutted" rod connection details at O.C. Cook (Ref. 3.6.6, Table 8-2). I The test data points for the welded coupler detail are plotted below on Figure 8=5 from Reference 3.6.6 (this figure was used to develop the fatigue evaluation screening charts in the GIP). Each test data point represents 3 tests (6 tests total) on 5/8" rods with an applied axial tensile preload (ITT) of 2.2 ksi (500 lb.) The test data points lie above the "2/3 Strain Acceptance l.ine", which represents the ductility demand vs. cycles to failure acceptance criteria for field-threaded rods. Therefore, in these LAR's, in order to cover rod-hung raceway supports that have not been selected as LAR candidates because of lower weight or longer length, but which may have welded coupler anchorage details, Rod Hanger Fatigue Evaluations will conservatively include the procedures specified in the G1P for field-threaded rods. FATIGUE DATA FOR THREADED RODS COMPEER. ~INST. CVRV8 W/ flGD THRIVED 3.20 2.80 2.60 aa06 ltae~~~
<<Ildt40W4c AQ(.
3 2a0 ACCEPTANCE LINE P 2.20 a 1.60 1.40 1.20 0 1.00 1.008+00 NOt5lAUZED OVOllUIYDo&NO O. C. Cook AA6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-14
3.6 References 3.6.1 "Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design", 9th Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, lnc. Chicago, IL, 1989. 3.6.2 "General Engineering Catalog", No. 10, Unistrut Building Systems, GTE Products Corporation, Wayne, Ml, 1983. 3.6.3 "General Engineering Catalog", No. 12, North American Edition, Unistrut Corporation, Wayne, Ml, 1992. I 3.6 4 "Generic Implementation Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification Utility Group. 3.6.5 "Design of Welded Structures", Orner W. Blodgett, James F. Lincoln Arc Welding Foundation, July 1976. 3.6.6 "Seismic Evaluation of Rod Hanger Supports for Electrical Raceway Systems", EPRI NP-7152-D, March, 1991. 3.6.7 "Cable Tray and Conduit System Seismic Evaluation Guidelines", EPRI NP-7151-D, March, 1991. 3.6.8 "The Performance of Raceway Systems in Strong-Motion Earthquakes", EPRI NP-7150-D, March, 1991. 3.6.9 "Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment Anchorage" EPRI NP 5228-SL, Revision 1,Volume 1, June, 1991. 3.6.10 AEP Guideline No. 18.3, Rev. 4, 4/9/86: "Guide for Cable Tray Loading" 3.6.11 Test Report 91C1681-02, Testing of D.C.Cook typical Unistrut attachment brackets for rod hung cable trays. 3.6.12 AEP Drawing No. 1-2-EDS433-14, Sheet 1 of 2, 5/31/91. 3.6.13 "Longitudinal Load Resistance in Seismic Experience Database Raceway Systems", EPRI NP-7153-D, March 1991. 3.6.14 AEP Document No. 02-0120-1097, Revision 0, Page 3 (Rigid Conduit Weights) 3.6.15 Letter from I.C.Huang of AEP Service Corporation to Steve Anagnostis of Stevenson and Associates, 1/10/94, re: as-installed conduit weights for raceway supports LAR011 and LAR017. 3.6.16 "Rigid Frame Formulas", A. Kleintogei, Frederick Ungar Publishing Co., New York, 1952. /. D. C. Cook A-46 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-15
3.6.17 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Drawings: 1-1594-4 1-1460-75 1-1528-51 1-1525-57 1-1464-83 3.6.18 AEP Guideline No. 18.2A, Rev. 0, 6/27/86: "Guide for Cable Tray System Design". 3.6.19 Telecopy dated 4/29/94 from I. Huang of AEP to Steve Anagnostis of Stevenson and Associates regarding as-installed cable tray and conduit weights for LAR's 1,3,5,9",10,16,18, and 22. 3.6.20 Letter from I.C.Huang/AEP to Steve Anagnostis/Stevenson and Associates, April 7, 1994-results of testing of D C Cook modified embedded Unistrut, 3.6.21 Stevenson 8 Associates Design Report, AEP Raceways 82C200-02, Cable Tray Testing-Analysis and Report, 9/30/83. 3.6.22 Telecopy from I.C.Huang/AEP to Steve Anagnostis/Stevenson and Associates, May 6, 1994-Field information concerning LAR011 (bolt spacing and conduit spans). 3.6.23 "Low Cycle Fatigue Tests on 5/8 inch Threaded Road" by Dario A. Gasparini, P.E.IPh.D., Dept. of Civil Engineering, Case Western Reserve University for Stevenson 8 Associates, March 25, 1992. D. C. Cook A<6 Cable Tray and Conduit Raceway Review October 1995 page 3-16
REQUESTED SAMPLE LAR CALCULATIONS 001,005,010,011,022,023,027,030
I CUENT JOB No. IS' SHEET OF Fb ~KM Stl.'VenSOn and ASSOdateS A 5rruc rural Maclra alca I Hl Coarultrag Eagiaaerrag Frrra
./9
CUENT
%6 DC 4 ZAZ-ooi Stevenson end Associates O5' C7 Il A SrrnclnrohMochoalcol Coaoolliag Englnoorlng flrra ~cr /(
CUENT SUOJEGT gd g~g< Zs4- oo/ Stevenson and Assodatcs A Sauctural.Mechoolrsl
~. aoP 5I coasu!5og Knylnoaanq Few c
Or8 ~Adds
CUENT smu acr ce ~ ~M-oat Stevenson and Associates sa / Il h Souelvwl.Mechanical R Coasulaao Kayiaoorlaa Flies
ZXt$ g C
~Fthm< 'Os6fyL OMIQN-S I s P",
sl I s IL 4" s I s
~rSI6,CW yV I I I
I iW. 80K sl fs I I 4 Q'IIILT4)~ EHVDpQ $ I,V-RLl 0'cow vt I
..'sr.r,', . ss IIIII~1WT YC'IsgL 'ag)~gL @0 ~
7 I' ~ ~ '4I g. > . ~ 'I>y~ t,Mss 's& s' ~ +Jlgt s' I LLI t ~ 1, t .=r arS Wt+~~I.SI~gq~ ss N.IHP B. 631'- 0" yss g'laos'r. IL~"e~ $ 3ss I'3s's 3y ~ II CIJLMIS (TC0 Skt"~h"s CI M
$
Gib
$ I gs II lg ss gs, gII ~~IoO ao IIEr~rrIar WI5 ~Et OVK GLKVhToR..
IIEET WO
~PPoRY ACeVa rL. LL cO1Lo" ¹2
tPIlfyl. wY'g4iW.
~ (
Qf&Ar
+PC~~' I >> Y,'
I I I n,>/sr> Z4L
'4.
I I I I I
+ g>> ml>>)>VS cAOA ~l II5I~P 1 ling,,
fdJla>>>> t i>> t>> %A>> ~ >>>>A>>>> e P>>>>>>J, x wan ar>> a tat u>>>>Ie>>'sr&.s.>>>>~~ ag
~:
Al -'P tL fdPP Na> 22,15t 5 lts5IFT 12.444 LSSlI=T glc%$ Ppi'>'h~ II>>C I5 I2,55t' $5/FT 10.4$ L$5lFT z C n 6,tA C m D l
~
1S;hLS>iFT GIAN 693 O m N AlRm+ C1 6-4
'z4. 5(o4 $ 5rFt'y>>
1Q.625 LBSf FT v:c&ts N)
~ ~
sk@i 6~'4 YAM-FS l>>r 4'T%lC
. 1LQIcd&'4'IGLOO 2 .c,t23 g>> )II hllKHHVf SVRh4 C46. I>>QY WO 5 LCVh'To@>>
g>>>> I>>ll At'TUEL WT5 FOR LAR4' SUPPLY R.>> %L
¹ <
C>>5>>I>>r 0 ~ COH001T VVEJC lOEHTlFI CATION UNKNOWN
0 CUENT L r Stevenson and Assodates <85$ 'D9 l'ScM/oZ II A s<ruclural Moehaalcal Coneulling Enylnooeny l'leaa
. ~ CUENT ggu~ + '4@8 S Stevenson and Assodates SS JQ II A svuciurel.Mechanical f con oui li ay agiaoorlny Fa w x C.>>
CUENT sum ccr ~+'> ( DQ 2ccm Stcvcnson and Assodatcs A Suwtvral Moehoaleol Q Cosevl8og Eaylaoorlay Fires 4 S CP
CUENT Smuem P~rr Stevenson and Associates Q A SnueNral Mechanical cohsulUay laglaoo<lnp n<m 4'4rx Lad- Wc ID'
SC'IC CUENT SUOJ~ 4 b 4AZM cv5
/HPO auaac 6 oa c Rcvcnson and Assodates AY~re M Fitch's~- ~roB ~>Pz H A Steuccusahkechaalcal Coa>ulpop Kaplaeeclop Ace ~ W~. ma. ~ ~
S zs 9 Z4Z-oos Stevenson and Associates Il A Svuctuwl Moeho nlcsl Coaeu!5'nginooenp Fans
p'g. A ~ ~~ ~OQ ~
~ ~
We.ckc@D goo Yo RaD Cc&PL/JJh To L 'j$',Q RgoUklP WSLD (mK)
&EE VETAlL "C-C" 1%AC~
ear> ~/~ TAI 2'-to 11 I 2/g IAMC8 I AN P3 U-eu MPs pp >Q f "1/g'
'- 4/g" &EE 5~~ 6" PETA'lL U - t'LAMPS l AM-XIO I AMP QvQ )1 p gI Ie,"(n@
l AN-CGQ f A,N< CG [ l AM-C82 g1/ Il
2'D I I I I l l lqx2x2 x)0 L l I I /g. UN&BRUT
~
BoLl(~) i I I 8 MC5>t=-0
)
I I )0+g" DEg Rv'T PETAlL "c.-c'PXT <wI'poRT TNP-
~ vPFg~
A
')>r5 HOT eAGHL=E
'34 l8:46 FROn AEPSC NUCLEAR DES PAGE.OQ4 LEFT'O RIGHT IA."-2840(o-I, 2.98 LBS / FT ACTUAL NElGWT5 FOR LAR ~5 I'I~"- 50IIZR- I, 3.2.2 LK5/ FT <r~-- SOIOSV-I, S.ZZLS>r Vr I - 9957R-I, I.73 LBS/FT 'q ~ I"-205I3-I, I.BI( 6 LHS/FT ~
j,Pp
~o gg~ ~ ~
We.Eke@& BOD
~o Hot Cc vPLQK~- t-PIUM@
XC L 3/4. nu >aV4C> EL. 633'~f wctu> I'~eg
&EE OFTA1L "c-c" 'R&KP eon P
a'< ~~z g 'pg&hDP l0. 95 LB5/FT 2 3O
'29.Hr 5 L65IFT U-cLkNPs 3~C8 3AM PZ 3 LEFT TO RKHT 1t 0"-9Z.G2PS-I) IO;75 L55/FT 4'-'MBPS-I fO.GHL65/FT U-CVd4P5 lANxto )ANTE .
C~Q LEFT TO RIGHT I4. 291'o LD5/FT w.~ra". 25 'H54L65/'I-T t-3 g yl1 3g Q~) 3 AN-'C80 I~~CG t I AM-C82 I.FI-T TO RISIIT
+I.95 LSD/FT l 25cg'xP "SF~ (TYP) 34.Z7 LB5/ FT >2,77 I.Pv/ FT
D2 o Joulk>. +~~+~ III O sHEEf ~ oFM~ Elf'UENT 4AM-use 8 Stevenson and Assodates A svuctu( ~ I Mn<<hnnlcnl R Cnnlulgng Knglnuuslng LJ. OW
CUENT
~guECT D O o
Stovenson and Assodates II cosoullsy A Strwte re lkoAo nlcs1 Ksylaoooay Fleas
CUENT XeN. ~<~<~~ SHEET 3 OF~~ E muccr > C Stevenson and Associates id' ~Z II AS(naciecabHocbaeleal Coasulliny Enolsoerlsa I <<w
0 CUENT
~c Stevenson and Assoclates A slnscturel Mechanical im Coastal'5aO Kngtnoedsg Fhm
CUENT l Stcvcnson and Assodatcs A structural Hocbaaiea'I ER coneulsny Englnoodna Fcce
V h
CUENT Stevenson and Associates A SlluclulnlJlochn nlcnl H Con<utgng Cnglnuurlng finn 7d
~ C
CUENT mum Stevenson end Assodetes h Srrac<arsl Mschsslcsl W Cssralriarr taylssarlsy Firrs xg
Rcvcnson and Associates IL Suuctu<al Mochaalcal RI Con o villa@ Esglaeorlay E'l(a
CUENT JOG No. Stcvcnson and Associates o5' A ScwNral htoehonlcal Nm CoaevlCng Caglaoeslsy Fwa
CUENT Stevenson and Assodatcs A Stiactvial Mechanical S Coaouluny Eaoisoeclsy flea
CUENT SUBJECT Stevenson and Associates A Sltvc(v ral MoAo alcsl Rl Conoul5sa Kaylnoorlao Faa l/
~ ~
CUENT Stevenson and Associates Il A S<oadvrol.Woc4alcsl Coaoultley Eaglnoo(lay Foes O
CUENT E Stevenson and Assodatcs A sv~ousal Mechaaical E5 Coa>vlsay Ksglaoerlay Fns
CUENT L Stevenson and Associates A Snvctssal l4ochaaks1 l5 coao~hay Esyisoonay nba d
CUENT Stevenson and Associates 24&a 0 El A Suvelurst.Mechanical Consolan'aylneorlng fl<w CD'c
CUENT JOO Na MS O SliEEE ~& OF ~F Stcvcnson and Associates h strvciscn Mechanical l5 conovlUne ssolssorlnp fires
/z
CUE~r SUOJECr Stevenson and Associates II A suuelucol Mechanical Conouluna Esglaoorlsp Fifa
.<' (S ag
(( I W4 I p'rf att/+
+ ae a , ACTUAI WEIG ~ ~ ~
( ~ ~ ~
! FOV LAR~IO QJ IrJ a
Q. I, ~ ~
~,
ei
~
tV
~ r,'
JI g"
~ ~
r Jttr
~ 'I+a ~ . ~ ~e ~ ~ t ~
3c', J ~IS
~
fvyt
~ ~ r ~
J
~
r( tva I f
~ ~ ~
th) I
. a(htJ (JC.S'. &PPoRT ~ ~ ~
I I
¹ )0 Sr I'
te
~ ~
1 ~ g)y; Nr. I kgu(r er rt t at I t
~ ~ ~ ~' ~ ~ * \ ~ +A ~
rat ~ ~ ~ I
~ t ~ ~ \ lai ~ ~ ~
g
~ I ~ ~ ~
- jt QI(J '
~
r
~ ~ ~
r'. J J I
~ )'jest I I"- 9957R-I ~ 'I ~ 'J ge 'LB>/I:T . I' ~ 'i75 ~
JCJ!4 ICJ'CJ r I"- coNOUjT (JJ CI
'.77 LM/i-"7 '~ 'JI ;i I ~
I TRAY L, j TQ fZ '-':.,
; ~ ~
R COiOuITJ gt t ICT- C(l ~: (ri. .,a -;
~ I"-'253I- I . ~ Ir I Na I CT- Ce ~ ~ ~ Ia t,s,".'> ~~ I b'I LBS/Pg ' '.') ~ I ~ ~ '7s70 Leih/ F.'.T i l CT C7 a]))Sg J( 'a D
z I"-2528-I ~ Qg, Ji.tt FROHT ~ ~ ~ ~ I
~
TRAY MIGII76 L
~(IS(ng LES// I-T ~
N ~ 'I ~ q 2;l,07 M5/k7 C I~
- 0. i ~ r a I(IQ. - 0 f(S 0 4. - I
'I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
lt. ~ rTlt I9, M, .LE'J/ PTJ: 4-'+bI(JPY-f,
~ '
z I,(I5 LB5/I=T I ~ '.,~ 'C IOIIl.LR5/ FT 20.08 LP&/FT ( ~ I
~ I ~ ~ ~C ~
REAR II na'I > c r r ~ ~
$
ml rat al I5
~ ~ ~l
- 1 i,.(p r
~ ~ \ ~a IM N
IGT.- I CT-
~ ~
a ~ ~C ~ IA I +'l- 8(l&qFf-I ~ XI I I ~ ( I ~ IOI6 LSD/ Jg REAlZ m! ~ J
~ ~
r I
- "$ l:
I ~ I ~
~ ~ ~
(ea I'IH n..a!LRS/Xr (JJ: I ~ \ ~
~ J CI ~ I ~ r>
(SJ ' r 'V rt I'"I I 80
/I ~ ~ t ~
LB5lPT'l't..
~
I 'a ~ Q.. a, S
~ I tr ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I I I et I ~,
~ te) a ~ f I tl. Ii tait)VL I ~
J J'I ~ ~ ~e t t ~,C ~
'I ~ r) ~ ~ ~~ >V,.: "~ . ~ / ~ ..
a4"
~ I ~ ~ r r g4"recco 'I~ ~ 1 ~, Korrl F- ~ ~ bC ~ 4 ~ Ite)o 4 I eh ~ r r4e Oe~ r ~ vrouw ~
Sel I
~
SUPPoRT. ¹ >0
~ g ro .'goJ'sA tp Atr I II( r 'o II ~ 'I 'le ~
I I ~
~ ~ O. . Jgpq ~q I so ~
Qfttr AA aClvej
'
IS <tr "~ J,I1 I ef}e I~IAII A I s..IJIC I
~
IJ I 'I I ..'
~ ~ I e
spl I h ~ o t.'~
~ I ~ ~ \ I. I I Its!I'e.t' Ikl+'Cr ICI Cl s 'I, ~ ~
ff K I'lr I
<<II' s'
S s IsosrtI S I I I JI
\ I:II I
~ I Cutltf P II s
. I etel ~ ~ ~~ re tA
- -rr ~ A.04
'I f:4~3 ore. e%% ~ o e'I ~~~
I ~ II I ~ St.s'r 1 J')'
)'Io s II I I.'ll I' I ~
I ~ I II
~
f>c I I .Il I I II I,II ~
~ ~
I r'
@Ager ~ rrr' ' 'I I ~ rsrr 'f I I I I I~ ~ ~
r ~ I Ie CIIJ) I r I I IlI
~
I sl I' rl ' I
-e ~ e'rie K ~ L. I I~
I II
~ )!I"r.. ~
II ~ J" ~ rKr / I Ie I ~
~o ~ ~ ~ I I ~" ~ Ce6 'I \ $ r r ~~ slee ~ ~ ~ leer o ~ \
Il e. I
~
II
~ I ~ ~ ~ Ilsr't tt" ~ \ s ) ~ I I ~
sg I Ii I
'P ~ IS ~ ~ ~
e',I ~ I ~
~D eOeS I Sr\,
I
.IL.' ISnrICIrs IIA I '" ~ r J. ~~ ' ,~ ~ @ "rll,'r 'g Ietll 'r t AALU I ~ ~
r rs I I In IA" 11'J i ~ ~
~ ~
I's ~ L ~
~ ,r)I ~ (~ ~ ~ ~ 'rt IeorSIII
0 CCW 5' S Stevenson and Associates A Structural Mechoslcil @I Cosovlllay Eaylaooclny Fam 6
0 SUOJFCT 4d 844& DC Coen STEVENSON &a slntctwo4nochonlcot ASSOClATES H8'SS rD> rica"ro/ M~A/ conwtttng onglncottng tlrm
SUOJEGT A JOB No. ++ ~~~ ~ SHEET~~ OF~~ gA z449 S O CO STEYENSON tU 5, ASSOCIATES 0 lttvclw04Mchonlcol conwNny enqlnoodnp Arm
SUBJECT JOB No. ~~~++~ SKEET'=OF~
~/
DOC~ b~r~ J STEVENSON Du-o'er' 5 ASSOCIATES a sliucturo4neehonlecA conwWAg ong'Inoohng Nm
0 SUBJECT JOB No. o SHEEf 5 OF
/~
D2 Caom ~im S Xd' STEVENSON S4M-w/'r'ASE 84 ASSOCIATES a aovchroHnochoNcd rap Wca-COhWNAQ Ohglhlhrlhg Sftl
SUBJECT SHEET 0F STEVENSON K0 IIWCfutCHAOChQhICCI ASSOCIATES COA WIIIAP CAQfhtOAlg fllfh 844-Oi/ HA2~ JDW P ag /0/ ~ Nl 0 I/I 5 UJ
~ 0
CLIENT amECT Qa Stevenson and Associates A suvctvtal Mochoslcol coneulusq ssolhttclly Flra
0 g ~ ~ S STEVENSON 5a slrvcluroHn+chantcol ASSOCIATES conwmng nnglnonnng Arm xo/ 6
~j
CUGNT Stevenson and Associates 8 A stnaclvwl Hechaslcal f cosevhisy tsglooonng na
SUZeRT.-To
= jPSRS~"~~-~
SUPPORT ... mHF NSro85-V"~) .. 'd' M'M.H'...s ... (TYI',)
~ms'eor.,Y= ASQQo.R..piM~ioMG (T~P) 25 '2 7/')> . 8'k3'~ i~"L 8
24 27/ ii
&
2Q.:ply Il 22 pal
'2I FL. EL. SSS'-o ~u.
20~<<~~l. r- ~8>, 8 19 lB i>
- e rt)y QQp Sf 3~X/qL ---=~V---'-'A=---A '~.)
lo
]~ . r> 'lb 5UI'f'opT AHCRog. PiN, is PLBX i SL.P. C.OT
>0 tx 0)q> io 8' bc. PI > 4~)
@ ~l@
x)q sJ@ ola
~he bc
- . 1ND<kNP N~CWC kg po%ER DoNKLD c.. cooK NuciEp,p PLAN~
. DP-. B<. N. MAa~R ...DATE
- E4. BB&'-.o."........BUILp'1N&, "AUX. SR GHEE RH ant 4 AGEE LAP go pg
~
- LoC.P,YiOH RvJGw, can.;.:.PiPE .-YUQHEL JN/7 @
'~Yt<lC ) )J~
. ATTACHMENT NQ.3
~>~vcr~'ue>oW'ery+~
ypP g ~un~ sun~ LoQ Bod 5o ]JF YT SvPPi&T MlS SuFPoR~ Ch)F iu Rv)<V
'@Pc 'Yu~)UF L Gun-<
l Phoo I I I I g/ tl Wq//~ 5 pig Acx EoLTI
+'ovC~I)
I 7 r 5
)l 0
lo
+% "zg~g',dy~ 4v t }/ ga /4Apg'3 glO
ATTACHMENT NO. 1 COOK NUCLEAR PLANT A-46 RACEWAY EVALUATIONS LARoll CONDUiT CONDUXT SIZE CABLE TYPE POUNDS PER FOOT BASIS FOR WEIGHT NO. AND TYPE AND SIZE OF CONDUIT AND .CALCULATION (SEE XN CONDUIT CABLE (SEE LXSTED ATTACH. NOS.) ATTACH.3) 3/4" EMT 1-12/C f12 XLA 0.97 5 & 7C 1" EMT 2-2T/C f16 0.73 5 & 8B 1" EMT 1-STP g16 0 '9 5 & 13B 1 1/2" RIGID 1-4/C g7/3.8 2.87 6 & 7C STEEL RIGID 1-4/C g7/18 2.87 6 & 7C STEEL 1 1/2" RIGID 1-4/C g7/18 2.87 6 & 7C STEEL 2" RXGXD 1-3TC g4 3.81 6i 9i & 10 STEEL 1-1/C g4 2" RIGID STEEL 1-4/C gl2 3 '2 6 & 7C 3" RIGID STEEL 1-3TC g2/0 1-1/C g2 7 '1 6, 9, & 10 10 3" RIGID 1-3TC g2/0 7 '1 6, 9, & 10 STEEL 1-1/C g"2 2" RIGID STEEL 1-3TC g2 1-1/C g4 3 '2 6, 9, & 10 2 i'IGID STEEL 1-4/C /12 3 '2 6 & 7C 3" RXGXD STEEL 1-3TC g4/0 1-1/C g2/0 8 '9 6c 9,.& 10
)p) f i ~' ~giant ~ II%IS la) hl 4l n)a~a <~) gg O 0 l8) 'i%% f QSÃl . ~eat I%f4 I Nr> ~03 %% .
4~ C ~ I%$ Pi~ ~ )+
<iS Cl 88 5 ~
rn KAF. Ot
'rM l~0z,.'
lRE J
/
J ~
'P A ~
CUENT C.AQ 5 Stcvcnson and Associates GNAT iDP ~ - os ~ezra ~. Il llstevcwcal Hochanlcal CDlllll4lligKllglhoollhO Fcm
CLIENT SmuECT 4+6 Stevenson and Associates A Sttuatutal Nathan(cal SX i&~ Q CaaeulUntt Eaelnaatlng fltta Zo r
GUENON sujet~ 8' CA/Z ~ Stevenson and Associates SZ A Snueivr ~ I.MecLanical Q Conevlsny Kayisoocag Firm
< s ~s ~nno5r CA Dirt hsf'Lo ~ ~ ~ l ~
I l gQQQ+ C5>> GUPPY%
+/DAN GSZC-P2.
I>s Op L GSZC-CS nAS:
- 18. 5'2 I.B5/ I=T f
tt t'S ll'~
~o Sl mrs" ZOO L I'>>A'b 'AA07 ~ ~JA 0 SECT 3 - M.'T8"Z.
9.'ISLETS/ T
'-~I 65(PT IZ+KC-Z.
d'iJ gp~~~
<A4 ~
I5i01 PIOOO ItIIgPy,
~ I>> gO ~ ~ ~
1'COT t, ~, ~ scrrrrH m v sum's
~
Au ~ ~ Z.'>> 7SGM 2. 4.A 4 I.65/ PX O D I D 0 ACTUAL VJElC HT5 FOR 4/AR:~ZZ Cl m IQCMTIPICATIOH QF It <, Il/2." g C,D'5UNKHOWH Ci7 C)
g~o7 Tg 1I' JCC. N> 2 L~t%555o Lk (Tft3 iiI
~
II il il I I'O'I ~ ue Octal. A I'it+It &to L I'-44'4 SECT
'A'A'g'll co-. %'tt cor ~ ~
l'a Pg M, f I 4 CoiIOIItt OX I&i('ii~ CII. I.HM4IIIII%
~ ~ CWTX II'IC~ 'll.
BOVTEM MhY SVPT'5 PEAN VlEW t
Egad o SHEEf OF d CCW 5 dPc O 0 CO STEVENSON
- 5. ASSOCIATES s5 zD8 Pea 659 &~<9 tU K
a Itntcfvtctmocttantcol conutttlnp onplnoottntt Ilrm gyy 4 @f82/8 ~4..
SUBJECT JOB No. SHEET~UQF 4+5 848~ 0 STEVENSON 5, ASSOCIATES a Auelvcahnoe~ cantina ongfnoodng nrm b
SUMFGT STEVENSON K ttructurotrnnchontcol ASSOCIATES o conautNng nnptneertnq nrm
P I
'4 ~, ~ ~
0 0 0 0 g1l @l < pl l Qll
- cga-TKg A-g SEE-.: DETAK. A 4 ~ I ll e I fL. Gl 6l2-0"
0 SUNEGT STEVENSON
- 5. ASSOCIATES 0 ltmchnol4lochohlcol coneNnp onplnoonnp turn A5s ro+&W 9 uzi 5r
sussex STEVENSON 8( ASSOCIATES
SUBJECT JOB Ho. +~~~ SHEET &OF~~ PAz7 STEVENSON 844- oP 2
- 8. ASSOCIATES a sovclvrounochoMol CchNNho Ohglhccdho Alhl ESP
SUBJECT Goo~ err 0 STEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES S/D C COhSVINhg OhQIA40tlhg flllA O r'/ O S
SUBJECT JOB No STEVENSON 8( ASSOCIATES conwmng onpHoorlng am
0 M
~w//7 5 z,S 0
STEVENSON 5 ASSOCIATES Mrz P3 conweng onplnoonnp Arm 1/ g
0 !
SUBJECT lPIIHF.STD/K 0 SHEET F OF O STEVENSON 8( ASSOCIATES o Etructrrrolrnochonlcot consrrtttng ongtnoortng arm 0 su~O a7 ~ F
6w/i 2 STEVENSON 8t. ASSOCIATES Q ltntchl<OHTi4ctMtnlcnl cntuttlnp ongtnoorlnp tttm
S CCC 5 /7
-/C.
O re STEVENSON ltt 8c ASSOCIATES tt o structurotrnoctronlccl conruttlng onglnoorlng llrm
STEVENSON 8c ASSOCIATES o rrruclrrrcHnochanrccl conrrrrtlng onprnoodnp tlrm
SUBJECT JOB Ho. STEVENSON 8( ASSOCIATES a ttructvrctrnochcnlcnl ccnwtttnp onglnoortnp hrm
SUBJECT JOB No.
+6 84r8 s Z
STEVENSON 8 ASSOCIATES eonsuenp onplntorlng tern 7 %imam WC,
r el( ((( oA~ S))1)OI SAC'lh. ~
\'o1 Oe(ll 'IAI(
( )
<<UNh r Ci>f
( Alta 4 9( V14) (4 fool l((fI o%~ f(IOA IIII'1o
,h4<)('() telo IOtfftf g W OV(f ~ ~ If~r SOT'TEN lRAYS NC&c~~i CI,All II f(IIIKO ho CIA an t1'I'11~'Wb ~0 ~
o [lo ~ I'
~~ )i/ ~ I(fII ~AIII1AII A(I K> I(IOI a)It) fAt4 1S LC1~'(f V I (( ~ ( lo C(OKAY C COSMIC lLCLIAt IAAI(f Cr Aflgis'It"I'Ia. rCCTIC((I A A' COnll((((n(% (Oftf IIO t ~ (fAS 0 ~
L. 01'4 CC IIO- 1 ~ I, WI((AS'5
- t. ((A(I4LI('I OATC I(.1( '%1.
tC C44
~ ~ ~
2c C~S
~ ) I~1 COL 17 J 2C'CW i (J( ~ I 1 ~A - zc I ~
I I I I I
~ I I. l ~
gpP ww T'II AY5-
SUBJECT ...SZC/5 9o o >~i 0 STEVENSON ZAg- o So rrs 8( ASSOCIATES o ssrvctwosrnochonrcol consurrlnSS onynoorhq rrrrn 2oarÃrww)ewe 8cbp3 -ro ro Og QC
SUBJECT ZAN> r STEVENSON &0 IoMclvfokhochnnkcl ASSOCIATES Conukonp onplnoohng ilrm
9'TEVENSON 8( ASSOCIATES 0 SlcUClvt04IhlChohtCN COAWNA9 OA9414OEIA9 llCN
SUBJECT JOG No. 6/ SHEET~ OF 0 C/l STEVENSON UJ
- 8. ASSOCIATES CC 0 oltMcIvcoMlochofllcol consvNng onglnoodng tlcm "r'O
2" 5/8 ROD BENT AROUND PIPE AND BOLTED INSIDE P1000 ANGLE
"
I 5/8 EXPANSION ANCHORS
~ ~
I I EMBEDDED STRUT 2'-0" 31 ~ 2'-6" 1'-0" 10" PIPE CRANE WALL VIEW A-A o ALL ANGLES ARE 3X3X1/4 o PIPE PENETRATES CRANE WALL AT EL. 603' 10 AND RUNS UP INSIDE CRANE WALL TO A JUNCTION BOX AT EL. 625'-6". THERE IS A LATERAL SUPPORT AT EL. 610'. NO OTHER SUPPORTS EXCEPT PENETRATION AND JUNCTION BOX. o PIPE LAYOUT SHOWN IN DRAWING 1 1460 (SEE SECTION 1X-1X AND DRAWING 1-1525). UNIT 1, LOWER CONTAINMENT CONDUIT 1A1: 10" PIPE D. C. COOK A-46 RACEWAY WALKDOWN PASS ID//: RACE-1>1, LAR //2
CALCULATIONUSED TO RESOLVE THE OUTLIER GENERATED BY LAR 8022
QUENT C/ cuccc ~ a" 89C1570-HF-OOI
~
Stevenson and Assodatcs A Sauctuccl Mochoalccl mm Coaoulu ap Kaplaocrlup Puca cc
CUENT nrem ran Stcvcnson and Assodatcs A Stractaral.Mochankal Q Conrrrttintt Enpinoortnrt Firm
CUENT SUOJECT Stevenson and Associates I A Sgupturnl Mnpbnnlpnl Cpneuliing Englnnoeng Fgw
1 CUENT SUBJECT 5 SHEET ~ OF ~~
. CF Stevenson and Associates A STTHSTE T ~ I MSOiTSEICSI R COOSE'lung EnglnESTing FTTES OF'I
CUENT smM DF Stevenson and Associates A Sfrucluf41 Muchnnicnl R5 Cnnrulrinp Knpinnnrinp firm 6 4 3(
0 L CUENT C S ~ SHEEi. ~pP~ Stevenson and Associates A st<ucNs ~ I Mechanical Q conevaino Ksqineoano arm
CUENT S 8 C- OGQ Stevenson and Associates h Suuct~ral Mechanical H cossunisy Esglaoeany fnm
CUENT JOE HF C SHEET $ OF ~ Stevenson and Associates ii, SIT S Iiurs hMSSha OiC*l l3 ConSVIITOTI KngiOSSriOTI fTTTTI 43 IF
cuEwr SUBJECT / Stevenson and Associates A Suuc<u< ~I Mechonlgal 55 conovning engineering l'atm PS l g k
PROCEDURE USED TO ADDRESS THE OUTLIER GENERATED BY LAR 8005
- 1. Introduction and Summary The prying-action detail documented in Plant Area Summary Sheet RACE103 and analyzed in Limited Analytical Review LAR005 resulted in an outlier. Per the Outlier Seismic Verification Sheet, the recommended resolution to this outlier is to walk-down the plant and document.all occurrences of this detail, screen the specific configuration of each detail using an acceptance criteria based on the LAR requirements, and modify those occurrences that do not meet the criteria. This document addresses the first part of this resolution - the walkdown and screening. The screening criteria is described in Section 2, the screening walkdown documentation is contained in Section 3.
This walkdown was performed by the Seismic Review Team members that did the bulk of the original raceway walkdown: I. C. Huang (AEPSC) and Stephen Anagnostis (SEA). The walkdown included all the areas of the plant covered in the raceway walkdown except for the Unit 1 containment above El 650 and inside the crane wall below El 650, as the unit was operating (the Unit 1 containment annulus was included). Based on the original raceway walkdown and that this walkdown of the Unit 2 containment did not find any significant occurrences of the prying-action detail, the SRT concluded that the Unit 1 containment does not contain any significant occurrences of the prying-action detail. The results of this walkdown is summarized in Table 1. The first column contains the walkdown worksheet number (the worksheets are in Section 3), the second column describes the location of the hangers with the prying-action detail, and the third column states whether the hangers passed or failed the screening criteria. About 50 hangers with the prying-action detail were found (note. that some worksheets cover more than one hanger). Twelve of those hangers failed the screening criteria. All of the hangers that failed are located in one area of the plant - the Unit 1 Vestibule and the adjacent section of the Unit 1 Reactor Cable Tunnel. Table 1. Summary of the Prying Action Detail screening walkdown. Worksheet ff Hanger Location Pass/Fail, 1-092694-1 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 3 North Pass Hangers 9, 10, 11 along the right wall counting from door 1-DR-AUX323. 1-092694-2 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4 Pass Hangers 5, 6, 7, 8, 9 on the left wall counting from door 1-DR-AUX329. 1-092694-3 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4 Fail (1J Directly across the hall from penetration 1-CEP-4P5 1-092694K Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 4 P3ass Adjacent to penetration 1-CEP-4P5 1-092694-5 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Pass Two hangers across the hallway from penetration 1-CEP-1PG One hanger near MCC 1-CT-BN 1-092694-6 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Pass (2) Upper platform, 1st hanger on right facing door 1-DR-AUX467 1-092694-7 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Pass [3] Upper platform, first 3 hangers on left facing door 1-DR-AUX467 1-092694-8 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Fail Upper platform, first hanger on right off the edge of the platform. 2-092794-1 Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 3 South Pass Near 2-VRS-2200 (Upper Cntmt RMS "B" Data Acq Module) 2-092794-2 Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Pass Upper platform, two hangers about 3 hangers away from Door 2-OR-AUX468. Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 1
1-092794-3 Aux1, El 609, 4kV Area Pass Above 600V Bus IIA 1-092794-4 Aux1, El 609, Transformer Room Pass One hanger above 1-DGTAB and one hanger at the right side of the entrance. 1-092794-5 Aux1, Auxiliary Cable Vault Pass [4] 15'outh of the hatch 2-092894-1 Aux2, EI 573 Pass 6'outh of gate 2-GT-AUX1 013 (U2 Rx Coolant Drain Pump Room) 2-092894-2 Aux2, El 573 Pass South end of the hallway common to both units 1-092894-3 Aux1, El 609, elevated area adjacent to the control room cable vault Pass Above 12HV-ACA-FLT-3 2-092894-4 Aux2, El 609 Pass Near Miscellaneous Rack 2-H-H 2-092894-5 Aux2, El 609 Pass Above cabinet 2-BITH2 1-0928944 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT Pass [5] Next to 1-DR-AUX467 1-092894-? El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT
'ux1, Pass 3rd hanger on left from the edge of the platform 1-092894-8 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT Pass 4th hanger on left from the edge of the platform 1-092894-9 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT Fail [6]
2nd hanger on right from the edge of the platform 1-092894-1 0 Aux1 El 612, Vestibule
~
Fail 4 hangers along the containment wall just before the upper platform leading to the RCT. 1-092894-11 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule Fait [73 The hanger above the west end of 1-HE-22 and the next hanger west. The two or three hangers south of these running along the block wall. 2-092894-12 Aux2, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT Pass 4th hanger on right from the edge of the platform 2-092894-13 Aux2, El 633 Pass Hangers between the Containment Auxiliaries Panel and 2-MSI-1. 2-092994-1 Cont2, El 598, Annulus Pass Several hangers near Column 1, Az 63, Quad 1 [1] The angle is "clipped" to the embedded channel with the edge of a washer bolted into the embedded channel. Repair by drilling a hole through the angle and rebolting. [2] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the tw'o adjacent supports is <= 10', so GIP requirements would be met even if this support was removed. Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 8'5'n one side and 3'n the other) and a load per rod of 640ft.. This load satisfies the allowables of 20000 for DL and 2500Ã for 3DL as specified in the LAR calculation. [3] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria for 3DL, but was judged acceptable as the r/c wall on one side and a large pipe, and platform steel and handrail on the other side will prevent any significant lateral motion. ' Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 2
[4] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the two adjacent supports is <= 10', so GIP requirements would be met even if this support was removed. Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 7'4.5'n one side and 3.5'n the other) and a load per rod of 440% This load satisfies the allowables of 2000@ for DL and 2500@ for 3DL as specified in the LAR calculation. [5] This case doesn't meet the screening criteria, but was judged acceptable as the span between the two adjacent supports is 9'<= 10'), so GIP requirements would be met even if this. support was removed. Note that the adjacent hanger would then have a tributary length of 7.5'4.5'n. one side and 3'n the other) and a load per rod of 600iti. This toad satisfies the allowables of 2000'or DL and 2500ft for 3DL as I specified in the LAR calculation. [6] Both rods on this hanger do not meet the screening criteria (this hanger was the subject of LAR iIi'5, which initiated this effort). [7} The two hangers above 1-HE-22 probably need both rod anchorages to be modilied - these two hangers are on either side of a removable concrete hatch. The rods furthest from the corners of the hatch were clearly visible (and do not meet the criteria), the rods nearest the corner were not easily visible but look like they will also require modification. I The rods immediately adjacent to the block wall of two or three hangers running along the block wall were not clearly visible, but do not look like they will meet the screening criteria. i Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 3
- 2. Screening Criteria 2.1 Criteria Development This criteria is for evaluating the D. C. Cook cable tray hanger anchorage detail shown below for seismic adequacy in accordance with GIP procedures (Ref. 1).
Lg P v vpv
'v V
I/2 OR 5/8 UNISTRUT NUT AND BOLT IN EMBEDDED UNISTRUT L2x2x1/4 or L3x3xl/4
'c = Bearing force on concrete FR = Te'nsile load in threaded rod Fa = Tensile load on Unistrut bolt Force in Unistrut bolt: Fa = FR(1 + Lg/Lq) => FR = Fa/(1+ Lg/L1)
Maximum moment in angle: MMAx = FRL2 FR'MAx/L2 In this detail, bending stresses in the angle and pullout force on the Unistrut bolt will each limit the capacity of the anchorage. The equations above show that the bending moment in the angle is related to L2, while the force in the Unistrut bolt is related to the ratio of L2 to L<. As the ratio L2/L< increases, the lever action on the Unistrut bolt increases for a given rod load FR. r li 'I The anchorage detail above is used on rod-hung trapeze hangers. For trapeze-type supports, which may swing laterally during an earthquake, the GIP requires both a Dead Load Check and a Vertical Capacity Check (3 x DL) of the anchorage. The vertical capacity check ensures that there is extra design margin in the anchorage to account for additional loads due to support displacement. This detail is also used on wall-mounted brackets to provide vertical support at the cantilevered end. These supports are directly attached to building structure and are not free to move during an earthquake. Per GIP procedures, only a Dead Load Check is necessary for these supports. Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 4
Allowa I n b ndi s ess Bending stresses in angles are calculated in accordance with the AISC specification for single-angle members, Ref. 2. Per Section 5.2.1b of the specification, the calculated bending stress, fa, is: fa= 1.25M/S = 1.25FnLz/S where S is the geometric section modulus of the angle section. For the Dead Load Check, the working stress allowables given in Ref. 2 are used. Per Sections 5.1 and 5.2 of Ref. 2, the allowable bending stress is 0.66 Fq for 2x2x1/4 L's, and 0.6 Fq for 3x3x1/4 L's. For the 3 x DL Check, an allowable bending stress of 0.9FY is used for both angle sections. The bending stress, fa, and the stress limits are summarized as follows: 1.25FnLz/(0.247) 5 0.66Fy for L2x2x1/4, DL Case 1.25FqLz/(0.577) 5 0.60Fy for L3x3x1/4, DL Case 1.25FnLz/(0.247) 5 0.90Fy for L2x2x1/4, 3DL Case 1.25FnLz/(0.577) 6 0.90Fy for L3x3x1/4, 3DL Case liow le nis b llo I d Allowable pullout loads for the Unistrut bolt are summarized below (see Ref 3 for discussion): 1/2" bolt 2000 Ib, DL Case 5/8" bolt 2000 Ib, DL Case 1/2" bolt 2000 Ib, .3DL Case 5/8" bolt 2500 Ib, 3DL Case Limits for Lz and Lz/L< for a given Fz are listed below for all combinations of angle size, Unistrut bolt size, and load case. DL case, bending in L2x2x1/4: 1 25F+Lz/S 6 0 66Fy Lz 5 0 66 (36 000)(0 247)/(1 25Fn) > Lz 5 4690/Fn DL case, bending in L3x3x1/4: 1.25FnLz/S S 0.60Fy => Lz 6 0.60 (36,000)(0.577)/(1.25Fn) => Lz 6 9970/Fn 3DL case, bending in L2x2x1/4: 3x1.25FpLz/S s 0.9Fy = Lz s 0.90 (36,000)(0.247)/(1.25x3Fn) => Lz s 2130/Fn 3DL case, bending in L3x3x1/4: 3x1.25FL,/S 6 0.9Fy Lz 5 0.90 (36,000)(0.577)/(1.25x3Fq) => Lz s 4990/Fn Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Watkdown page 5
DL case, pullout of 1/2" Unistrut bolt: FR(1+LE/Lq) 5 2000 Ib => L2/Lq 5 (2000/FR)-1 DL case, pullout of 5/8" Unistrut bolt: FR(1+L2/Lq) 52000 Ib => L2/Lq 5(2000/FR)-1 3DL case, pullout of 1/2" Unistrut bolt: 3FR(1+LE/Lq) 52000 Ib => LP/Lq 5(667/FR)-1 3DL case, pullout of 5/8" Unistrut bolt: 3FR(1+L2/Lg) 52500 Ib => LP/Lq 6(833/FR)-1 The equations above are summarized in table form below. LOAD CASE ANGLE UNISTRUT DL 3DL (LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 (IN., MAX) L2/Lg(MAX) L2 (IN., MAX) Lp(L/(MAX) 2x2x1/4 1/2" 4690/ FR (2000/FR) 1 2130/ FR ( (667/FR)-1 5/8" 4690/ FR I (2000/FR) 1 2130/ FR I (833/FR) 1 1/2" l l 3x3x1/4 9970/ FR I (2000/FR)-1 4990/ FR , (667/FR)-1 5/8" 9970/ FR '(2000/FR)-'I 4990/ FR '833/FR)-1 2.2 References
- 1. Generic Implementation Plan Procedure (GIP), for Seismic Verification of Nuclear Plant Equipment", Revision 2A, March, 1993, Seismic Qualification Utility Group.
- 2. "Specification for Allowable Stress Design of Single-Angle Members," from Section 5 of the AISC Manual of Steel Construction, Allowable Stress Design, Ninth Edition, American Institute of Steel Construction, Inc. Chicago, IL, 1989.
- 3. LAR criteria document Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 6
2.3 Screening Charts Screening charts for F in increments of 25 lb up to 800 lb. appear on the following pages. SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR < 'l00 LB LOAD CASE Fn ANGLE UNISTRUT DL 3DL (LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 (IN., MAX) L2/L) (MAX) L2 (IN., MAX) L2/L) (MAX) I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 188 79.0 85.2'25.7 6/8" 188 79.0 85.2 I 32.3 I I I 3x3x1/4 1/2" 399 79.0 200 I 25.7 5/8" 399 79.0 200 I 32.3 I I I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 93.8 39.0 42.6'12.3 5/8" 93.8 39.0 426 I 157 I I I 3x3x1/4 1/2" 199 39.0 998 I 123 5/8" 199 39.0 998 I 16,7 I I I
'2x2x1/4 1/2" 62.5 25.7 28,4 I 7,9 5/8" 62.5 25.7 28.4 I 10.1 I
I I 3x3x1/4 1/Z'/8" 133 25.7 66.5 I 7.9 133 25.7 665 I 101 I I I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 46.9 19.0 21.3 I 5.7 5/8" 46.9 19.0 213 t 73 I 100 I I 3x3x1/4 1 /2 II , 99.7 19.0 499 I 57 5/8" 99.7 19.0 49.9 I 7.3 I I Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 7
SCREENING CHART FOR FR < 200 LB LOAD CASE Fr( ANGLE UNISTRUT DL ~ ~ 3DL (LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 (IN., MAX) Lg/Li(MAxl L2 (IN., MAXI L2(L)(MAXI 2x2x1/4 1/2" 37.5 15.0 17.0 4.3 5/8" 37.5 15.0 17.0 5.7 125 3x3x1/4 1/2" 79.8 15.0 39.9 4.3 5/8" 79.8 15.0 39.9 5.7 2x2x1/4 1/2" '1.3 12.3 14.2 34 5/8" 31.3 12.3 14.2 4.6 150 3x3x1/4 1/2" 66.5 12.3 33.3 34 5/8" 66.5 12.3 33.3 4.6 2x2x1/4 1/2"'/8" 26.8 104 12.2 2.8 26.8 10.4 12.2 3.8 175 3x3x1/4 1/2" 57.0 10.4 28.5 2.8 5I8" 57.0 10.4 28.5 3.8 2x2x1/4 1/2" 23.5 9.0 10.7 2.3 5/8" 23.5 9.0 10.7 3.2 200 3x3x1/4 1/2" 49.9 9.0 25.0 2.3 5/8" 49.9 9.0 25.0 3.2 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 8
SCREENING CHART FOR FR < 300 LB LOAD CASE Fn ANGLE UNISTRUT DL 3DL (LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 tlN., MAX) L2/LIlMAX) L2 lIN.. MAX) L2/LIlMAX) 2x2x1/4 1/2" 20.8 7.9 9.5 2.0 5/8" 20.8 7.9 9.5 2.7 225 3x3x1/4 1/2" 44.3 7.9 22.2 2.0 5/8" 44.3 7.9 22.2 2.7 2x2x1/4 1/2" 18.8 7.0 8.5 1.7 5/8" 18.8 7.0 8.5 2.3 250 3x3x1/4 1/2" 39.9 7.0 20.0 1.7 5/8" 39.9 7.0 20.0 2.3 I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 17.1 I 6.3 ?.7 1.4 5/8 17.1 6.3 7.7 2.0 I I I 3x3x1/4 1/2" 36.3 6.3 18.1 1.4 5/8" 36.3 6.3 18.1 2.0 I I I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 15.6 5.7 7.1 1.2 5/8" 15.6 5.7 7.1 1.8 I 300 I, I 3x3x1/4 1/2" 33.2 5.7 16.6 1.2 5/8" 33.2 5.7 16.6 1.8 I I Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 9
SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR < 400 LB LOAD CASE Fr( ANGLE UNISTRUT DL ~ ~ 3DL (LBj SIZE BOLT SIZE Lp (IN., MAX} L2/Lt(MAX} Lp (IN., MAXl L2/L)(MAX) 2x2x1/4 1/2" 14.4 5.2 6.6- 1.1 5/8" 14.4 5.2 6.6 1.6 325 3x3x1/4 1/2" 30.7 5.2 15.4 1.1 5/8" 30.7 , 5.2 15.4 1.6 I I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 13.4 I 4.7 6.1 0.9 I 5/8" 13A I 4.7 6.1 1.4 I 350 I I I 3x3x1/4 1/2" 28.5 I 4.7 14.3 0.9 I 5/8" 28.5 I 4.7 14.3 1.4 I I 2x2x1/4 1/2" 12.5 4.3 5.7 0.8 5/8" 12.5 4.3 5.7 1.2 375 3x3x1/4 1/2" 26.6 4.3 13.3 0.8 5/8" 26.6 4.3 13.3 1.2 2x2x1/4 1/2" 11.7 4.0 5.3 0.7 5/8" 11.7 4.0 5.3 1.1 400 3x3x1/4 1/2" 24.9 4.0 12.5 0.7 5/8" 24.9 4.0 12.5 1.1 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Wa}kdown page 10
SCREENING CHART FOR FR < 500 LB LOAD CASE Fn ANGLE UNISTRUT DL 3DL (LBI SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 (IN., MAXl L2/L> (MAxl L2 (IN., MAX) L,iL,(MAxl 2x2x1/4 1/2" 11.0 3.7 5.0 0.6 5/8" 11.0 3.7 5.0 425 3x3x1/4 1/2" 23.5 3.7 11.7 0.6 5/8" 23.5 3.7 11.7 1.0 2x2x1/4 1/2" 10.4 34 4.7 0.5 5/8" - 10.4, 34 4.7 0.9 450 3x3x1/4 1/2" 22.2 34 11.1 0.5 5/8" 22.2 3.4 11.1 0.9 2x2x1/4 1/2" 9.9 3.2 4.5 0.4 5/8" 9.9 3.2 4.5 0.8 3x3x1/4 1/2" 21.0 3.2 10.5 0.4 5/8" 21.0 3.2 10.5 0.8 2x2x1/4 1/2" 9.4 3.0 4.3 0.3 5/8" 9.4 3.0 4.3 0.7 500 3x3x1/4 1/2" 19.9 3.0 10.0 0.3 5/8" 19.9 3.0 10.0 0.7 I Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 11
0 SCREENlNG CHART FOR FR < 600 LB LOAD CASE Fn ANGLE UNISTRUT DL 3DL (LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 llN., MAX) L2/L) lMAX) L2 llN., MAX) L2/L1 lMAX) 2x2x1/4 1/2" 8.9 2.8 4.1 0.3 5/8" 8.9 2.8 4.1 0.6 3x3x1/4 1/2" 19.0 2.8 9.5 0.3 5/8" 19.0 2.8 9.5 0.6 2x2x1/4 1/2" 8.5 2.6 3.9 0.2 5/8" 8.5 2.6 3.9 0.5 550 3x3x1/4 1/2" 18.1 2.6 9.1 0.2 5/8" 18.1 2.6 9.1 0.5 2x2x1/4 1/2" 8.2 2.5 3.7 0.2 5/8" 8.2 2.5 3.7 0.4 575 3x3x1/4 1/2" 17.3 2.5 8.7 0.2 5/8" 17.3 2.5 8.7 0.4 2x2x1/4 1/2" 7.8 2.3 3.6 0.1 5/8" 7.8 2.3 3.6 0.4 600 3x3x1/4 1/2" 16.6 2.3 8.3 0.1 5/8" 16.6 2.3 8.3 0.4 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Wa)kdown page 12
$ CREENING CHART FOR FR < 700 LB LOAD CASE Fn ANGLE UNISTRUT DL 3DL (LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE L2 IIN., MAX) I 2/L) lMAX) L2 (IN., MAX) L2/L)lMAX) 2x2x1/4 1/2" 7.5 2.2 3.4 0.0 5/8" 7.5 2.2 3.4 0.3 3x3x1/4 1/2" 16.0 2.2 8.0 0.0 5/8" 16.0 2.2 8.0 0.3 2x2x1/4 1/2" 7.2 2.1 3.3 0.0 5/8" 7.2 2.1 3.3 0.3 650 3x3x1/4 1/2" 15.3 2.1 7.7 0.0 5/8" 15.3 2.1 7.7 0.3 2x2x1/4 1/2" 6.9 2.0 3.2 -0.0 5I8" 6.9 2.0 3;2 0.2 675 3x3x1/4 1/2" 14.8 2.0 7.4 -0.0 5/8" 14.8 2.0 7.4 0.2 2x2x1/4 1/2" 6.7 1.9 3.0 -0.0 5/8" 6.7 1.9 3.0 0.2 .
700 3x3x1/4 1/2" 14.2 1.9 7.1 -0.0 5/8" 14.2 1.9 7.1 0.2 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Watkdown page 13
SCREENING CHART FOR FR < 800 LB LOAD CASE Fn ANGLE UNISTRUT DL ~ ~ 30L LB) SIZE BOLT SIZE Lp {IN., MAX) Lp(L){MAX) L2 {IN., MAXI L2/L]{MAX) 5/8" 6.5 1.8 2.9 0.1 3x3x1/4 1/2" 13.8 1.8 6.9 N/A 5/8" 13.8 1.8 6.9 0.1 2x2x1/4 1/2" 6.3 1.7 2.8 N/A 5/8" 6.3 1.7 2.8 0.1 750 3x3x1/4 1/2" 13.3 't.7 6.7 N/A 5/8" 13.3 1.7 6.7 0.1 2x2x1/4 1/2" 6.1 1.6 2.7 N/A 5/8" 6.1 1.6 2.7 0.0 3x3x1/4 1/2" 12.9 1.6 6.4 N/A 5/8" 12.9 1.6 6.4 0.0 2x2x1/4 1/2" 5.9 1.5 2.? N/A 5/8" 5.9 1.5 2.7 0.0 800 3x3x1/4 1/2" 12.5 1.5 6.2 N/A 5/8" 12.5 1.5 6.2 0.0 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 14
2.4 Anchora e Evaluation Works eet LI r, Fo Hanger Identification and Location: vVV VVV V t VVVVV
~ ~
I/2 DR 5/d VRIvvIRVI IIVI AND DDL'I VI CIIOCDDLD VIIISIRVl L2v2vl/I VI L2I2II/O Span: Estimated load on threaded rod, FR. FSTIMATED CABLE TRAY Calculations: AND CONDUIT WEIGHTS, PLF ITEM PLF CABLE TRAYS 25 1/2 CONDUIT 1.1 3/4 CONDUIT 1.3 1" CONDUIT 2.0 1.5" CONDUIT 3.5 2 CONDUIT 4.9 3 CONDUIT 11.1 4 CONDUIT 16.6 FIELD DATA: Angle size: Unistrut Bolt Size: Lengths: L1 L2/L1 LIMITINGVALUES FROM SCREENING CHART FOR FR= LB: DL CASE 3 X DL CASE (IF APPLICABLE)* Max L Max L2/L1 Max L Max L>/L1 Actual L Actual L>/L1 Actual L Actual L>/L1 PASS: PASS: PASS: PASS: YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO
*3xDL case N/A for wall mounted brackets.
Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown 1 page 15
I 3. Screening Walkdown Worksheets Worksheot ¹ Hanger Location 1-092694-1 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 3 North Hangers 9, 10, 11 along the right wall counting from door 1-OR-AUX323. 1-092694-2 Aux1 EI 596, RCT Quad 4
~
Hangers 5. 6, 7, 8, 9 on the left wall counting from 'd'oor 1-DR-AUX329. 1-092694-3 Aux1 El 596. RCT Quad 4
~
Directly across the hall from penetration 1-CEPAP5 1-0926944 Aux1 El 596, RCT Quad 4
~
Adjacent to penetration 1-CEP-4P5. 1-092694-5 Aux1, El 596, RCT Quad 1 Two hangers across the hallway from penetration 1-CEP-1P5 One hanger near MCC 1-CT-BN 1-092694-6 Aux1 El 596. RCT Quad I
~
Upper platform, 1st hanger on right facing door 1-OR-AUX467 1-092694-7 Aux1 El 596, RCT Quad I
~
Upper platform, first 3 hangers on loft facing door 1-OR-AUX467 1-092694-8 Aux1 EI 596, RCT Quad 1
~
Upper platform, first hanger on right off the edge of the platform. 2492794-1 Aux2, El 596, RCT Quad 3 South Near 2-VRS-2200 tUpper Cntmt RMS "B" Data Acq Module) 2492794-2 Aux2, EI 596, RCTQuad 1 Upper platform, two hangers about 3 hangers away from Door 2-DR-AUX468. 1-092794-3 Aux1, El 609, 4kV Area Above 600V Bus IIA 1-092794< Aux1 El 609, Transformer Room
~
One hanger above 1-DGTAB and one hanger at the right side of the entrance. 1-092794-5 Aux1 Auxiliary Cable Vault
~
15'outh of the hatch 2-092894-1 Aux2, EI 573 6'outh of gate 2-GT-AUX1013 (U2 Rx Coolant Drain Pump Room) 2-092894-2 Aux2. EI 573 South end of the hallway common to both units. 1-092894-3 Aux1, El 609, elevated area adjacent to the control room cable vault Above 12HV-ACA.FLT-3 24)92894M Aux2, El 609 Near Miscellaneous Rack 2-H.H 2-092894-5 Aux2, EI.609 Above cabinet 2-BITH2 1-0928944 Aux1, El 612, Vestibule, upper platform loading to RCT Next to 1-DR-AUX467 1-092894-7 Aux1. EI 612, Vestibule. upper platform leading to RCT 3rd hanger on left from the edge of the platform 1%92894% Aux1 El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT
~
4th hanger on left from the edge of the platform 1492894-9 Aux1 El 612, Vestibule, upper platform leading to RCT
~
2nd hanger on right from the edge of the platform 1-092894-10 Aux1. EI 612, Vestibule 4 hangers along the containment wall just before the upper platform leading to the RCT. 1-092894-11 Aux1 El 612, Vestibule
~
The hanger above the west end of 1-HE-22 and the next hanger west. The two or three hangers south of these running along the block wall. 2-092894-12 Aux2, EI 612, Vestibule. upper plalform leading to RCT 4th hanger on right from the edge of the platform 2-092894-13 Aux2, EI 633 Hangers between the Containment Auxiliaries Panel and 2-MSI-1. 2-092994-1 Cont2, El 598, Annulus Several hangers near Column 1. Az 63, Quad 1 Attachment to the OSVS for RACE103 Prying-Action Detail Screening Criteria and Walkdown page 16
Ip}}