ML18102B679
ML18102B679 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 11/14/1997 |
From: | Public Service Enterprise Group |
To: | |
Shared Package | |
ML18102B678 | List: |
References | |
NUDOCS 9711250087 | |
Download: ML18102B679 (9) | |
Text
r I I I I * . *Document Control Attachment 3 LR-N970707 LCR S97-17 . SALEM GENERATING STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSES DPR-70 AND 75 DOCKET NOS. 50-272 AND 50-311 CHANGE TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY AND CONTAINMENT COOLING SYSTEMS TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION PAGES WITH PROPOSED CHANGES The following Technical Specification pages for Facility Operating License No. DPR-70 are affected by this change request: Technical Specification Page 3/4.6.1.1 3/4 6-1 3/4.6.1.1 Bases B 3/4 6-1 3/4.6.2.3 3/4 6-lla 3/4.6.2.3 Bases B 3/4 6-3 The following Technical Specification pages for Facility Operating License No. DPR-75 are affected by this change request: Technical Specification Page 3/4.6.1.1 3/4 6-1 3/4.6.1.l Bases B 3/4 6-1 3/4.6.2.3 3/4 6-13 3/4.6.2.3 Bases B 3/4 6-3 Page 1 of 1 /
3/4.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3 / 4 .'6. 1 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION
==================================================================
3.6.1.1 Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall be maintained.
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4. ACTION: Without primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY, restore CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY within one hour or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS
==================================================================
4.6.1.1 Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall be demonstrated:
- a. At least once per 31 days by verifying that: 1. All penetrations*
not capable of being closed by OPERABLE containment automatic isolation valves and required to be closed during accident conditions are closed by valves, blind flanges, or deactivated automatic valves secured in their except for valves that are opened under administrative control as permitted by Specification 3.6.3.1., and 2. All equipment hatches are closed and sealed. b. By verifying that each containment air lock is OPERABLE per Specification 3.6.1.3. At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> by verifying that the surveillance requirements of 4.6.2.3.a are met for penetrations associated with the containment fan coil units. d. At least once per 18 months by verifying that the surveillance requirements of 4.6.2.3.d are met for penetrations associated with the containment fan coil units. *Except vents, drains, test connections, etc. which are (1) one inch nominal pipe diameter or less, (2) located inside the containment, and (3) locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in the closed position.
These penetrations shall be verified closed at least once per 92 days. SALEM -UNIT 1 3/4 6-1 Amendment No.
3/4.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES ==============================================================================
3/4.6.1 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 3/4.6.1.1 CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY ensures that the release of radioactive materials from the containment atmosphere will be restricted to those leakage paths and associated leak rates assumed in the accident analyses.
This restriction, in conjunction with the leakage rate limitation, will limit the site boundary radiation doses to within the limits of 10 CFR 100 during accident conditions.
3/4.6.1.2 CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE The limitations on containment leakage rates ensure that the total containment leakage volume will not exceed the value assumed in the accident analyses at the peak accident pressure, Pa. As an added conservatism, the measured overall integrated leakage rate is further limited 0.75 La or 0.75 Lt, as applicable, during performance of the periodic test to account for possible degradation of the containment leakage barriers between leakage tests. The surveillance testing for measuring leakage rates are consistent with the requirements of Appendix "J" of 10 CFR 50. 3/4.6.1.3 CONTAINMENT AIR LOCKS The limitations on closure and leak rate for the containment air locks are required to meet the restrictions on CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY and containment leak rate. Surveillance testing of the air lock seals provide assurance that the overall air lock leakage will not become excessive due to seal damage during the intervals between air lock leakage tests.
- The service water accumulator vessel and discharge valves function to maintain water filled, subcooled fluid conditions in the containment fan coil unit (CFCU) cooling loops during accident conditions.
The service water accumulator vessel and discharge valves were installed to address the Generic Letter 96-06 issues of column separation waterhammer and two phase flow during an accident involving loss of offsite power. The operability of each service water accumulator vessel and discharge valve is required to ensure the integrity of containment penetrations associated with the containment fan coil units during accident conditions.
If a service water accumulator vessel does not meet the vessel surveillance requirements, or if the discharge valve response time does not meet design acceptance criteria when tested in accordance with procedures, the containment integrity requirements of the CFCU cooling loops exclusively supplied by the inoperable accumulator vessel or discharge valve are not met. Limiting Condition for Operation 3.6.1. 1 is applicable, and the cooling loops for the two CFCU's exclusively supplied by the inoperable accumulator are to be removed from service and isolated to maintain containment integrity.
SALEM -UNIT 1 B 3/4 6-1 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS ' SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
==================================================================
I _;-a-,-b. At least once per 31 days by: 1. Starting (unless already operating) each fan from the control room in low speed. 2. Verifying that each fan operates for at least 15 minutes in low speed. 3. Verifying a cooling water flow rate of greater than or equal to 2550 gpm to each cooler. At least once per 18 months by verifying that on a safety injection test signal: 1. Each fan starts automatically in low speed. 2. The automatic valves and dampers actuate to their correct positions and that the cooling water flow rate to each cooler is greater than or equal to 2550 gpm. At least once per 18 months by verifying that on a Joss of offsite power test signal, each service water accumulator vessel discharge valve response time is within limits. 1. Verifying the water level in each service water accumulator vessel is greater than or equal to 226 inches and Jess than or equal to 252 inches. 2. Verifying the temperature in each service water accumulator vessel is greater than or equal to 55° F and Jess than or equal to 95° F. 3. Verifying the nitrogen cover pressure in each service water accumulator vessel is greater than or equal to 135 psig and Jess than or equal to 160 psig. SALEM -UNIT 1 3/ 4 6-lla Amendment No.
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS BASES ==============================================================================
3/4.6.2 DEPRESSURIZATION AND COOLING SYSTEMS 3/4.6.2.1 CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the containment spray system ensures that containment depressurization and cooling capability will be available in the event of a LOCA. The pressure reduction and resultant lower containment leakage rate are consistent with the assumptions used in the accident analyses.
3/4.6.2.2 SPRAY ADDITIVE SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the spray additive system ensures that sufficient NaOH is added to the containment spray in the event of a LOCA. *The limits on NaOH minimum volume and concentration, ensure that 1) the iodine removal efficiency of the spray water is maintained because of the increase in pH value, and 2) corrosion effects on components within containment are minimized.
The contained water volume limit includes an allowance for water not usable because of tank discharge line location or other physical characteristics.
These assumptions are consistent with the iodine removal efficiency assumed in the accident analyses.
3/4.6.2.3 CONTAINMENT COOLING SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the containment cooling system ensures that adequate heat removal capacity is available when operated in conjunction with the containment spray systems during post-LOCA conditions.
3/4.6.3 CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVES The OPERABILITY of the containment isolation valves ensures that the containment atmosphere will be isolated from the outside environment in the event of a release of radioactive material to the containment atmosphere or pressurization of the containment.
Containment isolation within the time limits specified ensures that the release of radioactive material to the environment will be consistent with the assumptions used in the analyses for a LOCA. The opening of locked or sealed closed containment isolation valves on an intermittent basis under administrative control includes the following considerations:
(1) stationing a dedicated individual, who is in constant communication with the control room, at the valve controls, (2) instructing this individual to close these valves in an accident situation, and (3) assuring that environmental conditions will not preclude access to close the valves and that this action will prevent the release of radioactivity outside he containment._
............
.-.........................................
., .. .. ............
.... The surveillance requirements for the service water accumulator vessels ensure each tank contains sufficient water and nitrogen to maintain water filled, subcoo/ed fluid conditions in three containment fan coil unit (CFCU) cooling loops in response to a Joss of offsite power, without injecting nitrogen covergas into the containment fan coil unit loops assuming the most limiting single failure. The surveillance requirement for the discharge valve response time test ensures that on a Joss of offsite power, each discharge valve actuates to the open position in accordance with the design to allow sufficient tank discharge into CFCU piping to maintain water filled, subcoo/ed fluid conditions in three CFCU cooling o s assuming the most limiting sin le failure ................
....._lllr.., _____
Amendment No.
3/4.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS . ' 3/4.6.1 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY LIMITING CONDITION FOR OPERATION 3.6.1.1 Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall be maintained.
APPLICABILITY:
MODES 1, 2, 3 and 4. ACTION: Without primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY, restore CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY within one hour or be in at least HOT STANDBY within the next 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and in COLD SHUTDOWN within the following 30 hours3.472222e-4 days <br />0.00833 hours <br />4.960317e-5 weeks <br />1.1415e-5 months <br />. SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS 4.6.1.1 Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY shall be demonstrated:
- a. At least once per 31 days by verifying that all penetrations*
not capable of being closed by OPERABLE containment automatic isolation valves and required to be closed during accident conditions are closed by valves, blind flanges, or deactivated automatic valves secured in their positions, except for valves that may be opened under Administrative control as permitted by Specification 3.6.3.1, and all equipment hatches are closed and sealed. b. By verifying that each containment air lock is OPERABLE per Specification 3.6.1.3. c. After each closing of a penetration subject to Type B testing, except containment air locks, if opened following a Type A or B test, by leak rate testing the seal with gas at Pa (47 psig) and verifying that when the measured leakage rate for these seals is added to the leakage rates determined pursuant to Specification 4.6.1.2.d for all other Type B and C penetrations, the combined leakage rate is less than or equal to 0.60 La. At least once per 12 hours1.388889e-4 days <br />0.00333 hours <br />1.984127e-5 weeks <br />4.566e-6 months <br /> by verifying that the surveillance requirements of 4.6.2.3.a are met for penetrations associated with the containment fan coil units. e. At least once per 18 months by verifying that the surveillance requirements of 4.6.2.3.d are met for penetrations associated with the containment fan coil units.
- Except vents, drains, test connections, etc. which are (1) one inch nominal pipe diameter or less, (2) located inside the containment, and (3) locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in the closed position.
These penetrations shall be verified closed at least once per 92 days. SALEM -UNIT 2 3/4 6-1 Amendment No.
3/4.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS ... .' ' ' BASES ==============================================================================
3/4.6.1 PRIMARY CONTAINMENT 3/4.6.1.1 CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY Primary CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY ensures that the release of radioactive materials from the containment atmosphere will be restricted to those leakage paths and associated leak rates assumed in the accident analyses.
This restriction, in conjunction with the leakage rate limitation, will limit the site boundary radiation doses to within the limits of 10 CFR Part 100 during accident conditions.
3/4.6.1.2 CONTAINMENT LEAKAGE The limitations on containment leakage rates ensure that the total containment leakage volume will not exceed the value assumed in the accident analyses at the peak accident pressure, P . As an added conservatism, the measured overall integrated leakage rate rs further limited to less than or equal td 0.75 L or less than or equal to 0.75 L, as applicable, during performance of periodic test to account for degradation of the containment leakage barriers between leakage tests. The surveillance testing for measuring leakage rates are consistent with the requirements of Appendix "J" of 10 CFR Part 50. 3/4.6.1.3 CONTAINMENT AIR LOCKS The limitations on closure and leak rate for the containment air locks are required to meet the restrictions on CONTAINMENT INTEGRITY and containment leak rate. Surveillance testing of the air lock seals provide assurance that the overall air lock leakage will not become excessive due to seal damage during the intervals between air lock leakage tests. The service water accumulator vessel and discharge valves function to maintain water filled, subcoo/ed fluid conditions in the containment fan coil unit (CFCU) cooling loops during accident conditions.
The service water accumulator vessel and discharge valves were installed to address the Generic Letter 96-06 issues of column separation waterhammer and two phase flow during an accident involving Joss of offsite power. The operability of each service water accumulator vessel and discharge valve is required to ensure the integrity of containment penetrations associated with the containment fan coil units during accident conditions.
If a service water accumulator vessel does not meet the vessel surveillance requirements, or if the discharge valve response time does not meet design acceptance criteria when tested in accordance with procedures, the containment integrity requirements of the CFCU cooling loops exclusively supplied by the inoperable accumulator vessel or discharge valve are not met. Limiting Condition for Operation 3.6.1.1 is applicable, and the cooling loops for the two CFCU's exclusively supplied by the inoperable accumulator are to be removed from service and isolated to maintain containment integrity.
SALEM -UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-1
.e CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS l *' I ii SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (Continued)
==================================================================
b .. -<il.-At least once per 31 days by: 1. Starting (unless already operating) each fan from the control room in low speed. 2. Verifying that each fan operates for at least 15 minutes in low speed. 3. Verifying a cooling water flow rate of greater than or equal to 2550 gpm to each cooler. At least once per 18 mOnths by verifying that on a injection test signal: 1. Each fan starts automatically in low speed. 2. The automatic valves and dampers actuate to their correct positions and that the cooling water flow rate to each cooler is greater than or equal to 2550 gpm. 1. Verifying the water level in each service water accumulator vessel is greater than or equal to 226 inches and less than or equal to 252 inches. 2. Verifying the temperature in each service water accumulator vessel is greater than or equal to 55° F and less than or equal to 95° F. 3. Verifying the nitrogen cover pressure in each service water accumulator vessel is greater than or equal to 135 psig and less than or equal to 160 psig. SALEM -UNIT 2 3/4 6-13 Amendment No.
CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS \;_' ; f* BASES ==============================================================================
3/4.6.2 DEPRESSURIZATION AND COOLING SYSTEMS 3/4.6.2.1 CONTAINMENT SPRAY SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the containment spray system ensures that containment depressurization and cooling capability will be available in the event of a LOCA. The pressure reduction and resultant lower containment leakage rate are consistent with the assumptions used in the accident analyses.
The containment spray system and the containment cooling system are redundant to each other in providing post accident cooling of the containment atmosphere.
However, the containment spray system also provides a mechanism for removing iodine from the containment atmosphere and therefore the time requirements for restoring an inoperable spray system to OPERABLE status have been maintained consistent with that assigned other inoperable ESF equipment.
3/4.6.2.2 SPRAY ADDITIVE SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the spray additive system ensures that sufficient NaOH is added to the containment spray in the event of a LOCA. The limits on NaOH volume and concentration, ensure that 1) the iodine removal efficiency of the spray water is maintained because of the increase in pH value, and 2) corrosion effects on components within containment are minimized.
The contained water volume limit includes an allowance for water not usable because of tank discharge line location or other physical characteristics.
These assumptions are consistent with the iodine removal efficiency assumed in the accident analyses.
3/4.6.2.3 CONTAINMENT COOLING SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the containment cooling system ensures that adequate heat removal capacity is available when operated in conjunction with the containment spray systems during post-LOCA conditions.
The containment cooling system and the containment spray system are redundant to each other in providing post accident cooling of the containment atmosphere.
As a result of this redundancy in cooling capability, the allowable out of service time requirements for the containment cooling system have been appropriately adjusted.
However, the allowable out of service time requirements for the containment spray system have been maintained consistent with that assigned other inoperable ESF equipment since the containment spray system also provides a mechanism for removing iodine from the containment atmosphere.
_ The surveillance requirements for the service water accumulator vessels ensure each tank contains sufficient water and nitrogen to maintain water filled, subcooled fluid conditions in three containment fan coil unit (CFCU) cooling loops in response to a loss of offsite power, without injecting nitrogen covergas into the containment fan coil unit loops assuming the most limiting single failure. The surveillance requirement for the discharge valve response time test ensures that on a loss of offsite power, each discharge valve actuates to the open position in accordance with the design to allow sufficient tank discharge into CFCU piping to maintain water filled, subcooled fluid conditions in three CFCU cooling loops, assuming the most limiting single failure. SALEM -UNIT 2 B 3/4 6-3 Amendment No. l