ML14007A033

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:35, 3 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment (00868) of Patricia Holloway on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14007A033
Person / Time
Site: San Onofre  Southern California Edison icon.png
Issue date: 12/20/2013
From: Holloway P
- No Known Affiliation
To:
NRC/SECY/RAS
SECY RAS
References
78FR56775 00868, NRC-2012-0246, PR-51
Download: ML14007A033 (4)


Text

1Rulemaking1CEm Resource From:RulemakingComments Resource Sent:Monday, January 06, 2014 3:43 PM To:Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc:RulemakingComments Resource

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:

1277 holloway.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/20/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00868

Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 904 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014435D73180)

Subject:

PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date: 1/6/2014 3:42:59 PM Received Date: 1/6/2014 3:43:55 PM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>

Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 1/6/2014 3:43:55 PM 1277 holloway.pdf 80817 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:

Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On:

NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document:

NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1277 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Patricia Holloway Address:

62 Via Santa Maria San Clemente, CA, 92672 Email: pat13holloway@gmail.com General Comment December 20, 2013 To the NRC:

My family lives in San Clemente, California, approximately 6 miles from the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station. I am writing to thank you for shutting down the nuclear plant, and to implore you to move the tons of radioactive waste accumulating on site to a safer location far from population centers.

In the 40 years since SONGS has been operating, the number of people living within 50 miles of the plant has grown exponentially representing one of the most populous areas in the state. This includes 65,000 residents now living in San Clemente within 10 miles of San Onofre. Since 9-11 Americans are acutely aware of the ongoing threat of a terrorist attack on a facility like this, and all southern Californians know that a major earthquake in our region is long overdue. The disaster at Fukushima is yet another reminder of our vulnerability to earthquakes, tsunamis, and circumstances beyond human control.

When I learned this past year that nuclear waste at San Onofre is being cooled in pools and then stored in casks indefinitely on site I couldnt believe it. Given the dangerous nature of the fuel and the above mentioned risks, how can this be tolerated?

PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: January 02, 2014 Received:

December 20, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.

1jx-89ep-6sxu Comments Due:

December 20, 2013 Submission Type:

WebPage 1of 201/02/2014 https://www.fdms.

gov/fdms-web-a gency/component/contentstreamer?ob jectId=09000064814d0b40&am

...

The NRC and the federal government must take immediate steps to address this hazardous situation and move all radioactive material to a remote location as soon as it is safe to do so. This has to become the top priority and primary mission of the NRC.

The problem of safely storing nuclear waste for hundreds if not thousands of years may never be solved. Yet until that day comes, no more nuclear plants should be built in this country. The economic, social, and environmental costs are far too hi gh, especiall y now that safer technolo gies for generating power are available.

Page 2of 201/02/2014 https://www.fdms.

gov/fdms-web-a gency/component/contentstreamer?ob jectId=09000064814d0b40&am

...