ML17308A469

1988 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept. W/890421 Ltr

ML17308A469
Person / Time
Site:	Saint Lucie
Issue date:	12/31/1988
From:	CONWAY W F FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
L-89-137, NUDOCS 8904270305
Download: ML17308A469 (173)

Text

kC CELEBRATED Dl~BUTJON DEMO%ST)flOY SY~gg REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)FACIL:50-335 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 1, Florida Power 6 Light Co.50-.389 St.Lucie Plant, Unit 2, Florida Power 6 Light Co.AUTH.NAME.AUTHOR AFFILIATION

• Florida Power 6 Light Co.CONWAY,W.F.

Florida Power 6 Light Co.RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION DOCKET 05000335 05000389

SUBJECT:

"1988 Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept." 7/890421 ltr.DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE25D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: Environmental Monitoring Rept (per Tech Specs)NOTES: D RECIPIENT-,>ID CODE/NAME'-'D2-2 LA NORRIS,'J INTERNAL: ACRS IRM TECH ADV NRR/DEST/ADE 8H NUDOCS-ABSTRACT RGN2'RSS/RPB EXTERNAL EGGG'IMPSON g F NRC,.PDR COPIES LTTR ENCL 4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD2-2 PD AEOD/DS P/TPAB NRR ROTHMAN,R R~RB~RBB LTr~1 RGN2 FILE 02 LPDR/.~COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 h R I h NOTE'IO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENIS:

PIZASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE!CONZACI'IHE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT.20079)KO EIJZGKLTB YOUR NME FRED DISTRZKKIGN LISTS H)R DOCUMEMI'S YOU DGNiT NEZD!TOTAL NUMBER-OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 22 ENCL 22 P.O.Box14000,Juno Beach, FL 33408-0420 APRIL 2 1 1989 L-89-137 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Gentlemen:

Re: St.Lucie Units 1 and 2 Docket Nris.50-335 and 50-389 1988 Annual Radiological Environmental 0 eratin Re ort This letter transmits the subject report in accordance with Technical Sper ification 6.9.1.8 for St.Lucie Units 1 and 2.Should there be any questions on this information, please contact us~Very truly yours, W..Con y Senior V'President-Nuclear WFC/RG/gp Enclosure cc: Stewart D.Ebneter, Regional Administrator, Region II, USNRC Senior Resident Inspector, USNRC, St.Lucie Plant an FPL Group company 0 t 890g270305 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1 AND 2 License Nos.DPR-67, NPF-16 Docket Nos.50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted By:Florida DHRS Report Prepared:/l ESP Report Reviewed: S5'04270305 SS1231 PDR ADOCK 05000335 R PDC

'I J E i,y 1 i~,)A 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS ENVIRONMENTAL RADXOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITXES LAND USE CENSUS EY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS DIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE FIRST QUARTER, 1988 SECOND QUARTERi 1988 THXRD QUARTER, 1988 FOURTH QUARTER, 1988 RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM, 1988 PAGE TABLE 1 TABLE 1A TABLE 1B TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C HP3: 1

'I I 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 I.INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of St.Lucie Unit No.1 and St.Lucie Unit No.2 Technical Specifications.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated.

This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit No.1 and Unit No.2.Technical Specifications.

II.RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A.~Pur ose: The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation.

The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not, higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.B.Pro ram Descri tion: The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the St'.Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to Technical Specifications 3/4e12 of St.Lucie Unit No.1 and St.Lucie Unit No.2 Technical Specifications.

1~Sam le Locations T es and Fre uencies: a~Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's).TLD's are collected and analyzed quarterly.

b.Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly.Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c~Surface water samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively.

Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

HP3: 1

/~lg J I[4 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.'LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 d.Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples.Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

e.Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2.Anal tical Res onsibilit Radiological environmental monitoring for the St.Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS).Samples are collected and analyzed by HRS personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.C.D.Anal tical Results: Table 1, Environmental Radiolo ical Monitorin Pro ram Annual~Summar provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified"A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables lA and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.Land Use Census: A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St.Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors.A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census~Summar No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.HP3: 1 (2)

C'h II 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 E.No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway)20%greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.Interlaborator Com arison Pro ram: The State of Florida HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency.Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided in Attachment C.III.DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A.Re ortin of Results: The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by the St.Lucie Plant, Unit Nos.1&2 Technical Specifications.

Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by Technical Specifications, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1.In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.

These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, Ra-228, Be-7, U-238, and Pb-210 which are common in the Florida environment.

B.Inter retation of Results Direct Radiation:

The results for direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant.The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program.Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.2.Air Particulates Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents.

All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable I-131.Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation.

The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preoperational surveillance program.Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.HP3: 1 (3) 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 3.Surface Water: The results for radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past, measurements.

Tritium was reported as present in two of the weekly surface water samples collected from Site H15.Subsequent samples indicate there has been no increase nor adverse trend for tritium in surface water samples at H15.The highest measured tritium was less than 24 of the reporting level specified by plant technical specifications, Table 3.12-2.No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected.Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.Waterborne Sediment and Food Products: The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program.There were no indications of any radionuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.5.Broad Leaf Ve etation: The results for radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program.There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.C.Conclusions The data obtained through the St.Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to member's of the public, are not being increased.

The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 6 2, during the surveillance year, are well within"as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.HP3: 1 0

E 1 Page 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Januar 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD UNITS: MICRO-R/hr Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Exposure Rate, 107 5.1 (107/107)4.5-6.6 NW-10 10 miles, NW 6.6 (4/4)6.5-6.6 5.9 (4/4)5.7-6.1 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0

E 1 Page 2 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS: PICO-Ci/M Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Mean f Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ontrol Locations Mean (f)Range'"I 260 0.024<MDA<MDA Gross Beta, 260 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 2 Be 4'Z'"C 137C 0.0025 0.0052 0.012 0.00069 0.00066 0.011 (260/260)0.004-0.028 0.127 (20/20)0.087-0.157 MDA MDA<MDA H-08 6 miles, WNW H-34 0.5 miles, N 0.013 (52/52)0.004-0.028 0.134 (4/4)0.095-0.157 O.OH.(52/52)0.005-0.017 0.126 (4/4)0.104-0.144 MDA<MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 Page 3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO-Ci/LITER Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Mean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Tritium, 64 Gamma Isotopic, 64 40K'4Mn 59F 58CO 60C Zn 95Zr-Nb 131I 134CS 137C Ba-La 230 60 270 (2/64)150-390 304 (64/64)220-370<MDA<MDA MDA MDA<MDA MDA<MDA MDA MDA MDA H-15 270 (2152)<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 150-390 H-15 305 (52/52)<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 220-370 MDA 298 (12/12)260-350<MDA MDA<MDA MDA MDA<MDA MDA<MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 E 1 Page 4 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, DRY Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance 6 Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 226Ra Th 23SU 238U Be 58CO Co 134C 4 137CS 140 49 52 100 14 12 300 (4/4)210-370 196 (4/4)174-220 70 (2/4)60-80 34 (1/4)200 (1/4)MDA<MDA MDA MDA MDA H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 340 (2/2)310-370 197 (2/2)174-220 80 (1/2)34 (1/2)200 (1/4)340 (2/2)310-370 197 (2/2)174-220 80 (1/2)MDA<MDA<MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 Page 5 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO-Ci/Eg, WET Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4 Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Mean f Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Control Zocations Mean (f)Range 40K 226R 228R 238U'4Mn 59F Co 60C Zn 134C 130 20 16 19 17 1570 (3/4)710-2100 14 (1/4)106 (2/2)100-113 190 (4/4)140-280 770 (1/4)MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 2000 (2/2)1900-2100 14 (1/2)113 (1/2)235 (2/2)190-280 770 (1/2)2000 (3/3)1900-2100 14 (1/2)100 (1/2)145 (2/2)140-150 MDA MDA MDA MDA<MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0

'A E 1 Page 6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Januar 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

FISH UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, WET Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance 6 Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K'4Mn 59F 58CO 6OC Zn 134C 137CS 130 16 10 17 2820 (4/4)2400-3500 MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA<MDA MDA H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE 3100 (2/2)2700-3500 3 100 (2/2)2700-3500 MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 E 1 Page 7 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL TORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1988 (County, State)PATHWAY INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, WET Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of a Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name'ean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 Be 40K 131I 134CS 137C 71 100 500 (36/36)280-710 2730 (36/36)900-5300 MDA MDA MDA H-52 1 mi, S/SSE H-52 1 mi, S/SSE 540 (12/12)417-710 2920 (12/12)2400-3400 480 (12/12)280-620 2850 (12/12)1640-4900 MDA<MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida (County, State)Reporting Period Januar 1-December 31 1988 NOTES a~The LLD is an"a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 95~probability with only 54 probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a real signal.LLD's in this column are at time of measurement.

The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

~~~~~b.Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).c~Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment

-A.d.Results are based upon the average net response of two TLDs.(Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NOS.1 6 2 TABLE 1A DEVIATIONS MISSING DATA A)Pathway: Direct Radiation Location: WSW-5, 5,miles WSW Date: 3/30/88 to 6/16/88 Deviation:

Failure to continuously provide exposure monitoring at this location for the second quarter of 1988 Description of Problem: The dosimeters for this site were missing when collection was attempted.

Corrective Action: Replaced TLDs upon discovery of situation.

Pathway: Airborne Location: H-30, 2 miles W Date: 8/9/88 to 8/16/88 Deviation:

Failure to continuously provide air sampling at.this location for the third week of August 1988.Description of Problem: The sample has a low collected volume.It is believed due to a power interruption during the sample period.There was evidence of construction work at the sampling site.It is estimated that sampling occurred during 113 of the 168 hour0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> period.Corrective Action: The sampling equipment was inspected and verified as operating properly.

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1&2 TABLE 1B ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1 1 88-12 31 88 The values specified in Table 4.12 1g Detection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATXNG REPORT ST.LUCXE PLANT-UNXTS NOS.1 AND 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS DISTANCE TO NEAREST (a, b)Sector 6/88 Milk (c)Animal 6/88 Residence 6/88 Garden (d)NNE NE ENE 0 (e)0'SE SSW SW WSW WNW NW NNW L (<)4.3/182 L 4.2/254 4.5/266 3.8/289 4.9/306 L 1.5/14 1 3.5/152 (g)3.2/191 2.2/213 1.9/236 1.9/245 (11)1'/260 2.3/281 3.5/304 L (g)4.0/208 1.9/234 1.9/258 2.1/275 3.8/288 3.7/306 L 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 TABLE 2 NOTES LAND USE CENSUS (a)All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St.Lucie Plant (b)The following format is used to denote the location: distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.(c)Potential milk animal locations.

All locations specified have been verified to be not producing milk for human consumption.(d)Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more.0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an ocean area.L denotes that, the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.(g)Non-residential occupied buildings in this sector include the following:

SSE-Fire Station, 1.8/149 SSE-Country Club, 3.4/153 NNW-Lifeguard station at beach 4.6/342 (h)Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St.Lucie Plant.

'j 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS

• 4"I 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST~LUCIE PLANT UNZT NOS~1 6 2 Key to Sample Locations ATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION 0 PLES COLLECTED:

TLD AMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 W-2-5-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 N NNW NNW NW NW WNW WNW WNW W W W WSW WSW WSW SW SW SW SSW SSW SSW S S SSE SSE SSE SE NNW 10 3 5 10 2 5 9 2 5 10 2 5 10 3 6 8 5 10 10 5 10 1 19 A1A, North of Blind Creek South of Pete Stone Creek Coast Guard Station Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.S.R.68 at S.R.607 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.U.S.1 at S.R.712 S.R.70, West of Turnpike 7609 Indian River Drive Oleander and Sager Street Interstate 95 at S.R.709 8503 Indian River Dr.Prima Vista at Yacht Club Del Rio at Davis Street 9207 Indian River Drive U.S.1 at Village Green Dr.Port St.Lucie Blvd at Cairo Rd.10307 Indian River Drive U.S.1 at Port St.Lucie Blvd.Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.13179 Indian River Drive U.S.1 at S.R.714 Indian River Dr.at Quail Run Lane Entrance to Nettles Island Elliot Museum South of Cooling Canal University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS 1&2 Key to Sample LocationsTHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

WEEKLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion H-08 H-14 H-30 H-34 H-12 Control: WNW SE N 0.5 12 FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.On-Site, Near South Property Lane Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive On-Site at Meteorology Tower FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart q~

1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST~LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS~1&2 Key to Sample LocationsTHWAY WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

H-15 WEEKLY H-59 MONTHLY H-15 H-59 Control: Location Name Direction Sector ENE/E/SSE S/SSE Approximate Distance miles 10-20 Descri tion Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location arne Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion-15 H-59 Control: ENE/E/ESE S/SSE 10-20 Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A South End, Hutchinson Island 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST~LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS~1&2 Key to Sample Locations THWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY!

SEMI-ANNUALLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion H-15 H-59 Control: ENE/E/ESE S/SSE 10-20 Ocean Side, Vicinity of St.Lucie Plant South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion H-52 N/NNW S/SSE Off-Site Near North Property Line Off-Site Near South Property Line H-59 Control: S/SSE 10-20 South End, Hutchinson Island CV O ri I i t o I 00 I<a'II.l i II I I FPSL s PROPERTY4 LI N E t O I N-1 I,.~H51I Q8LIHD I 4'R M Q O~~O O O O gl D 0 O.MN-2 Ot rh4 Inset Detail Py t,~'h~, io Ir+E'EK n'V'34 eC yC+0 I pl r I H15 I H3O'XCLUSION AREA (0.9Ž)ANO LOW POPULATION ZONE (I mi)I UNIT I UNIT 2 0'<<+~~KH~SE-1 f g,l WSH-2 FPSL s PROP E RT Y LINE~r f res J I ,lH14 i'~4~i'H52 4'I\~t~i~~4 0 O>>44 4 co V O P.O O 4 0 I/2 SCALE IN MILES FLORiDA POWER 8 LIGHT COMPANY ST.LUCIE PLANT SIT E AR EA MAP FIGURE 5.1.i y L J t V(CI pl

~HP tltl<<t>>tl r" 0 O'I'0 pphyp'I p~v'Li'I~~4~.p p IPPH.S H>(il 0~+$pl I)II?I V,'I<

>~Q pppp.2 H-2 l5?H-1", NP0$HlS Sf.l Hll'I 0 IP p, J~40II~$%.$PI.0-4 4 P?M/0 H C~?IP"~v 4 LQV.?0.0 tt'PH PI, tI P~Ig0 gt't I~0~$$K.N?gg 4~p?~~I Ile I I4>>4 IPP tt P4 I<<t>>>>41 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE 1988 First Quarter, 1988 Second Quarter, 1988 Third Quarter, 1988 Fourth Quarter, 1988 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE First Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services Wp 4 ST.LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fir'st Quarter, 1988 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of 1.Direct'Radiation 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Quarterly Weekly Weekly 27 65 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3.b Shoreline sediment 4.Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish 4.b Food Products=4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semian'nually Monthly 13 3 3*~Total: 219*-Includes DOE split'amples. NOTE~Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background.of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as'"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in-the sample. ST.LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING First Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-(micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Site Deployment 12-16-87 Collection 03-30-88 Notes: N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 5.1+0.3 5.1+0.3 5.0+0.3 5.1+0.3 6.6+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.0+0.3 5.1+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.3+0.3 5.1+0.3 5.3+0.3 5.1+0.3 4.7+0.2 4.7+0.2 4.8+0.3 5.0+0.3 4~8+0.3 4.9+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.0+0.3 5.0+0.3 4.9+0.3 5.5+0.3 5.3+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.7+0.3 (A)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.(B)Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 arid ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m)3 Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 01-OS-88 01-12-88 01-20-88 01-26-88 02-02-88 02-09-88<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.04 03-15-88 03-22-88 03-29-88<0.02<0.03<0.02 02-16-88<0.02 02-23-88<0.02 03-01-88<0.03 03-08-88<<=<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<o.o4<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.04<0.04<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02 I~~Qf 2.b AIR PARTICULATES -GROSS BETA-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 01-05-88 0.011 01-12-88 0.012 01-20-88 0.010 01-26-88 0.008 02-02-88 0.007 02-09-88 0.007 02-16-88 0.011 02-23-88 0.012 03-01-88 0.023 03-08-88 0.011 03-15-88 0.011 03-22-88 0.009 03-29-88.0.008+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0;002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.007 0.013 0.010 0.006 0.009 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.015 0.011 0.010 0.009 0.012+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.005 0.011 0.010 0.008*0.008*0.008*0.013*0.011 0.016 0.011 0.015 0.011 0.010+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.007 0.011 0.007 0.007 0.006 0.005 0.014 0.011 0.014 0.011 0.013 0.012 0.007+0.001+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.001+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.010+0.012+0.009+0.009+0.008+0.008+0.013+0.009+0.016+0.008+0.013+0.009+0.013+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Means: 0.011+0.001 0.010+0.001 0.011+0.001 0.010+0.001 0.011+0.001*-DOE split samples.-2.b AIR PARTICULATES -GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES -(Ci/m)3 First Quarter, 1988 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.138 0.144 0.150 0.145 0.157+0.010+0.010+0.011+0.010+0.010<0.027<0.028<0.019<0.017<0.018<0.0010<0.0009<0.0008<0.0012<0.0010<0.0008<0.0009<0.0008<0.0008<0.0008 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 (A)(B)Zr-95 Ba-140 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 H15 01-05-88 01-12-88 01-20-88 01-26-88'2-02-88 02-09-88 02-16-88 02-23-88 03-01-88~03-08-88 03-15-88 03-22-88 03-29-88<190<190<190<190<180<180<180<180<180<190<180<180<180 330+40 350+50 320+50 360+50 280+50 310+50 290+50 260+50 320+50 250+40 320+50 350+50 370+50<5<5<4<5<4<5<4<4<5<5<4<4<4<9<4<5<9<10<5<4<10<8<3<5<10<10<4<5-<9<10<4<4<10<10<5<5<12<10<5<3<9<11<4<5<10<10<6<5<10<10<5<4<10<12<5<4<10<11<5<5<9<8<4<5<10<7<7<6<9<8<7<8<7<8'8<7<8<9<7<8<7<7<10<8<7<6<8<7<5<7<7<5<5<5<5<5<5<6<4<4<4<5<5<4<4<7<4<6<4<6<4"<7<3<7<4<4<5=-<5<4<5<4<9<4<4<4<5<4<10<5<6 H59 01-06-88 02-03-88 03-02-88<190 310+50<5<8<4<5<8<8<7<5<5<180 340+'50<5<10<5<5<10<7<8<4<4<180 310+50<5<9<5<4<9<8<10<4<5<7<5<7 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct, measurement. of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. 3.b SEDIMENT-(Ci/k dr wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 U-235 U-238 H15*02-10-88<60 210+40<6<9<8<8 180+10 60+20 34+6 200+50 H59 02-10-88<90 310+50<10<7<10<8 220+10<23<120<280*-DOE split sample.4.a.1 CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 This sample was not collected despite several attempts.Attempts will continue.H59 02-10-88 2100+100<15<32<13<14<26<16 14+6<39 150+20 4.a.2 FISH-Mixed S ecies-(Ci/k , wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Ce-134 Ca-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 03-16-88 2700+100<10<28<13<10<27<12 H59 02-11-88 3500+200<13<29<13<13<30<12<13<27<47<14<25<60 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION -Man rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 01-06-88 540+40 2200+100<7<7<6 02-03-88 03-02-88 590+50 1800+100 590+40 1310+80<ll<15<8<8<6<8 H52 01-06-88 620+40 2600+100 02-03-88 640+40 2700+100 03-02-88 550+50 2400+100<8<10<14<8<8<8<7<7<8 H59 01-06-88 520+40 2200+100 02-03-88 560+50 2600+100 03-02-88 460+40 2100+100<8<13<14<8<10<9<7<8<8 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT CONPANYsS ST.LUCIE SITE Second Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services 'la ST.LUCIE SITETechnical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1988 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 52 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3.b Shoreline sediment~~~4.Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 13 3 0 Total: 212*-Includes DOE split samples.NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term..0 Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample. ST.LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Second Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-(micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Site.N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 Deployment 03-30-88 Collection 06-16-88 5.1+0.3 4.9+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.3+0.3 6.6+0.3 5.3+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.1+0.3 5.3+0.3 5.3+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.0+0.3 (C)4.5+0.2 5.0+0.3 4.8+0.3 5.2+0.3 4.9+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.0+0.3 5.0+0.3 4.8+0.3 5.5+0.3 5.3+0.3 4.9+0.3 6.1+0.3 (A)(C)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. The dosimeters for site WSW-5 were missing when collection was attempted. 2 , IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m)3 Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 04-05-88 04-12-88 04-19-88 04-26-88 05-03-88 05-11-88 05-17-88 05-'24-88 05-31-88 06-07-88 06-15-88 06-21-88 06-28-88'0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02.,<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.'03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.04<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02'0.02 <0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.03<0.03 jr t'@~i~ 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 04-05-88 04-12-88 04-19-88 04-26-88 05-03-88 05-11-88 05-17-88 05-24-88 05-31-88 06-07-88 06-15-88 06-21-88 06-28-88 0.014+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.016+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.009 0.012 0.013 0.011 0.010 0.010 0.014 0.008 0.005 0.010 0.012 0.015 0.012+0.002+'.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.001+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.012 0.010 0.010 0.016*0.010*0.013*0.012*0.007 0.007 0.011 0.007 0.004 0.009+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.019+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.012+0.002 0.010+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.010+0.002 Means: 0.013+0.001 0.011+0.001 0.010+0.001 0.013+0.001 0.011+0.001*-DOE split samples.2.b AIR PARTICULATES -GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES -(Ci/m)3 Sample Site Be-7 Second Quarter, 1988 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.114+0.009 0.121+0.010 0.137+0.010 0.144+0.011 0.152+0.011<0.026<0.026<0.016<0.026<0.026<0.0008<0.0008<0.0009<0.0009<0.0009<0.0007<0.0008<0.0009<0.0007<0.0009 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci/l)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 Ba-140 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 H15 04-05-88 04-12-88 04-19-88 04-27-88 05-03-88 05-11-88 05-18-88 05-24-88 05-31-88 06-07-88 06-15-88 06-21-88 06-29-88<180<180<180<180<180<180<180<180<180<190 390+60<180<180 340+50 350+50 220+50 330+50 310+50 360+50 300+50 330+50 330+50 300+50 330+50 310+50 360+50<5=<9<5<3<10<5<5<8<3<4<8<4<4<11<5<4<6<4<5<8<5<4<11<4<5<9<5<4<11<4<5<ll<5<5<9<5<5<7<5<6<4<5<5<5<5<5<5<4<4<4<5<3 (A)<10<7<5<12<7<8<6<7<6<9<9,<8<10,<7<8<11<8<6<12<7<5<10<7<6<12<6<5<10<9<8<12<7<8<8<7<6<10<8<9<6<5<6<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<5<4<4<5<5<4<5<5<4<4<5<4<5<4 (B)<6<5<7<8<5<8<4<6<5<5<6<6<7 H59 04-06-88 05-04-88 06-01-88<180 330+60<5<10<5<4<10<7<7<180 270+60<4<9<5<5<10<7<7<180 330+50<5<10<4<5 ,<10<7<7<5<6<6<5<5<5<5<6<3 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 05-17-88'10+80<11<22<10<12<24<15<11 113+9 280+40 4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION -Man rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-4 0 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 04-06-88 570+50 1950+120 05-04-88 620+40 2340+110 06-01-88.430+40 900+90<9<9<8<9<8<7<8<8<7 H52 04-06-88" 540+50-2560+130 05-04-88 630+50 3350+140 06-01-88 450+40 3260+140<10<10<8<9<8<8<9<8 H59 04-06-88 280+40 1640+90 05-04-88 480+50 2200+120 06-01-88 490+50 3300+130<8<10<9<7<8<8<6<8<8 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE Third Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST.LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1988 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Sam led Number of Sam les 1.Direct Radiation'uarterly 27 54 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates 3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3.b Shoreline sediment 4.Ingestion~~4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea-4.a.2 Fish 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Weekly Weekly Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually Monthly 65 69*13 3 3*Total: 219*-Includes DOE split samples.NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a'Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%confidence) for the true activity in the sample. ST.LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Third Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-(micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW<<10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10, S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 Deployment 06-16-88 Collection 09-13-88 5.2+0.3'.3+0.3 5'+0.3 5.2+0.3 6.6+0.3 5.3+0.3 4.9+0.3 4'+0'5.4+0.3 5.1+0.3 4'+0.3 5.1+0.3 5.0+0.3 4.6+0.2 4.6+0.2 4.5+0.2 4.8+0.3 4'+0'4.9+0.3 5.2+0.3 5.0+0'4.9+0.3 4.8+0'5.3+0.3 5.0+0.3 4.9+0.3 5.7+0.3 Notes: (A)These results have been determined .with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. \4 0 ll ,~0 2'IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m)3 Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 07-05-88 07-12-88 07-19-88 07-27-88 08-02-88 08-09>>88 08-16-88 08-23-88 08-30-88 09-06-88 09-13-88 09-20-88 09-27-88<0.03<0~02<0 02<0.03<0.04<0.03<0.03<0'2<0.02<0.02<0.02<0'2<0.02<0.03<0.02<0'2<0.03<0.04<0.03<0.02<0.02<0'2<0.02<0.02<0'2<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.04<0.03<0.02<0.03<0~02<0.02<0~02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.04<0'2<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0~04<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0'2<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.04(A)<0.02 A-This sample had a low collected volume.This is believed to be due to a power outage during work on power lines at this site.The equipment is estimated to have run for 113 hours0.00131 days <br />0.0314 hours <br />1.868386e-4 weeks <br />4.29965e-5 months <br /> out of the 168 total hours.for this sampling interval. I'i W.p 4 k' 2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 07-05-88 07-12-88 07-19-88 07-27-88 08-02-88 08-09-88 08-16-88 08-23-88 08-30-88 09-06-88 09-13-88 09-20-88 09-27-88 0.009+0.010+0.007+0.010+0.015+0.011+0.009+0.010+0.008+0.011+0.016+0.013+0.014+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.010 0.010 0.007 0.007 0.012 0.012 0.009 0.010 0.007 0 F 011 0.016 0.007 0.013+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.001+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.010 0.009 0.007 0.008*0.014*0.013*0.008*0.008 0.014 0.010 0.016 0.008 0.009+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.011 0.008 0.009 0.007 0.013 0.012 (A0.007 0.014 0.01,4 0.011 0.013 0.007 0.008+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.001+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0-009+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.005+0.001 0.013+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.009+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.006+0.002 0.008+0.002 Means: 0.011+0.001 0.010+0.001*-DOE split samples.0.010+0.001 0.010+0.001 0.009+0.001 A-This sample had a low collected volume.This is believed to be due to a power outage during work on power lines at this site.The equipment is estimated to have run for 113 hours0.00131 days <br />0.0314 hours <br />1.868386e-4 weeks <br />4.29965e-5 months <br /> out of the 168 total hours for this sampling interval.2.b AIR PARTICULATES -GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES -(Ci/m)Third Quarter, 1988 Sample Site H08 H12'H14 H30 H34 Be-7 0.098+0.009 0.104+0.008 0.100+0.009 0.087+0.008 0.095+0.008 K-40<0.024<0.016<0.015<0.012<0.015 Cs-134<0.0010<0.0009<0.0009<0.0008<0.0009 Cs-137<0.0007<0.0008<0.0007<0.0007<0.0009 f't pr 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 7 K-40 Zr-95 Ba-140 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 H15 07-05-88 07-12-88 07-19-88 07-27-88 08-03-88 08-09-88 08-17-88 08-24-88 08-30-88 09-06-88 09-13-88 09-20-88 09-27-88<180<180<180<180<180<170<170<170<170<170<170<170<170 340+40 310+50 360+50 340+50 290+50 320+50 330+50 280+50 310+50 260+40 290+40 290+40 250+40<4<10<5<5<10<4<5<9<4<4<10<4<5<9<3<4<9<5<5<8.<5<5<8<5<4<10<4<5<9<5<5<9<5<4<9<5<5<7<4 (A)<4<9<8<8<6<4<10<7<8<5<5<9<7'<7<5<5<10<8<13<5<4<9<6<11<5<4<9<9<8<5<5<10<8<7<5<5<10<10<8'5<5<13<6<8<6<4<9<8<5<4<4<8<8<5<5<5<10<6<6<5<5<10<7<5<5<3<4<5<5<4<4<5<4<4<4<3<4<4 (B)<7<8<7<6.<7<5<7<6<5<8<9<7<10 H59 07-06-88<180 350+50<5<10<5<5<9<8<7<5 08-03-88<170 270+40<4<9<4<5<11<7<10<5 09-06-88<170 270+50<3<8<4<5<8<8<7<3<5<5<5<8<5<7 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. 3.b SEDIMENT-(Ci/k dr wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134.Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15*08-03-88<90 310+70"<8<7.<9'9 210+20<60 H59 08-03-88<90 370+50<8<8<9<8 174+8 80+10*-DOE split sample.4.a.l CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 Attempts to collect this sample were not successful. Additional attempts will be made.H59 08-05-88 1900+100<11<31<12<9<30<13<10 100+10 140+60 4.a.2 FISH-Mixed S ecies-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 09-20-88 2400+200<16<30<17<14<32<14<13<33<70 H59 08-17-88 2700+100<11<26<10<14<22<13<13<31<60 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION -Man rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I>>131 Cs-134 Cs<<137 H51 07-06-88 , 380+40 2700+100<13<10<8 08>>03<<88 09-06-88 470+40 2400+100 390+40 2800+100<10<11<8<9<7<7 H52 07-06-88 410+40 3000+100 08-03-88 710+50 3300+100 09-06-88 500+50 2500+100<12<12<14<8<10<10<8<8-<10 H59 07<<06-88 420+40 3000+100<12<9<9 08-03-88 09-06-88 450+40 620+60 2500+100 3600+200<12<18<6<12<7<10 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE Fourth Quarter, 1988 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST.LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1988 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3.b Shoreline sediment~~~~4.Ingestion, 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish Weekly Monthly Semiannually Semiannually Semiannually 13 3 0 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 214*-Includes DOE split samples.NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95%, confidence) for the true activity in the sample. ST.LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Fourth Quarter, 1988 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-(micro-R/hour) Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters. Sample Site Deployment 09-13-88 Collection 12-14-88 Notes: N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW<<5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 5.1+5.0+5.2+5.2+6.5+5.1+4.8+5.4+5.0+4.9+4.9+5.0+5.1+4.6+5.0+5.0+5.0+5.0+5.1+5.3+5.0+5.1+4.7+5.3+5.0+4.5+6.0+0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 (A)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed. Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed. 2.a IODINE-131 XN MEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 10-04-88 10-11-88 10-18-88 10-25-88 11-01-88 11-08-88 11-15-88 11-22-88 11-29-88 12-06-88 12-13-88 12-20-88 12-27-88<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.04<0.04<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.04<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.04<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.03<0.04<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02 2.b AIR PARTICULATES -GROSS BETA-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 10-04-88 10-11-88 10-18-88 10-25-88 11-01-88 11-08-88 11-15-88 11-22-88 11-29-88 12-06-88 12-13-88 12-20-88 12-27-88 0.009 0.018 0.014 0.028 0.014 0.020 0.019 0.004 0.012 0.014 0.011 0.019 0.013+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.003+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002+0.002 0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.Oll+0.002 013+0.002 012+0.002 015+0.002 017+0.002 011+0.002 012+0.002 006+0.002 011+0.002 Oll+0.002 008+0.002 013+0.002 010+0.002 0.011+0.014+0.015+0.015+0.016+*0.013+*0.016+*0.006+*0.013+0.015+0.010+0.017+0.011+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.009+0.002 0.018+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.020+0.002 0.017+0.002 0.015+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.007+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.014+0.002 0.011+0.002 0.013+0.002 0.008+0.002 0.008+0.017+0.017+0.016+0.017+0.014+0.016+0.005+0.009+0.015+0.011+0.017+0.011+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Means: 0.015+0.001 0.012+0.001 0.013+0.001 0.013+0.001 0.013+0.001 DOE split samples.2.b AIR PARTICULATES -GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES -(Ci/m)Sample Site Be-7 Fourth Quarter, 1988 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.133+0.010 0.133+0.009 0.146+0.009 0.110+0.008 0.131+0.009<0.014<0.013<0.015<0.013<0.016<0.0008<0.0008<0.0008<0.0009<0.0010<0.0008<0.0006<0.0007<0.0008<0.0008 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 Ba-140 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)(B)H15 10-04-88 10-11-88 10-18-88 10-25-88 11-01-88 11-08-88 11-15-88 11-22-88 11-29-88 12-06-88 12-13-88 12-21-88 12-27-88<180<180<180<180<180<180<180<180 150+50<160<160<160<160 300+50 260+50 230+50 310+50 260+50 250+40 240+50 290+50 300+50 290+50 230+50 360+50 280+50<5<4<5<3<4<4<5<5<5<4<4<3<4<9<5<4<11<10<4<5<11<9<5<5<9<10<4<5<10<11<4<6<8<9<4<4<11<10<3<5<8<10<5<4<8<7<4<5<10<10<4<5<9<9<4<5<10<10<4<4<8<7<4<5<9<5<4<4<5<4<4<4<5<3<4<4<4<10<7<5<7<9<6<9<7<7<8<6<4<8<7<6<9<10<7<7<5<6<6<7<5<7<7<5<7<5<7<9<8<6<8<7<4<8<5<10 H59 10-05-88<180 260+40<4<9<4 11-02-88<180 280+50<4<9<4 12-07-88<160 260+50<4<8<4<4<7<6<7<5<9<8<6<4<10<7<6<6<5<5<4<3<4<4<5<9 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample. 4.a.1 CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k , wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date H15 11-11-88 K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134<350<23<49<24<26<47<24 Cs-137<22 Ra-226<440 Ra-228 190+30 U-238 770+80~~4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATXON -Man rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 10-05-88 580+40 5300+200 11-02-88 390+50 3400+200 12-07-88 440+40 1900+100<14<17<8<12<9<9<10<8 H52 10-05-88 520+50 3400+200<14<12<9 11-02-88 12-07-88 450+60 440+40 2600+100 3400+100<17<9<10<9<10<8 H59 10-05-88 540+50 4900+200<15<15<10 11-02-88 12-07-88 440+50 460+50 3000+100 3200+200<17<12<10<9 1 1988 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1988 If I E. FLORIDA DEPT OF HRS-EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1988 Media FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER FOOD FOOD FOOD FOOD FOOD MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER ATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha*Beta Cs<<137 Sr-90 I-131 Cs-137 K Sr-89 Sr-90 I-131 Cs-137 K Sr-89 Sr-99 Alpha Alpha Alpha Beta Beta Beta Cr-51 Co-60 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-65 Ru-106 Ru-106 Cs-134 Cs-134 Cs>>137 Cs-137 H-3 H-3 Sr-89 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-90 03 03 03 03 01 01 01 01 01 06 06 06 06 06 01 03 05 01 03 05 06 02 06 02 06 02 06 02 06 02 06 02 06 01 05 Ol 05 25 25 25 25 29 29 29 29 29 24 24 24 24 24 22 18 20 22 18 20 03 05 03 05 03 05 03 05 03 05 03 12 10 08 06 08 06 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Nuclide Collection Mon Day Yr EPA Known 20 50 16 17 102 91 1230 46 55 4 6 11 8 13 ll 69 94 105 64 94 3327 30 15 Units pCi/F pci/F pCi/F pci/F pCi/Kg pCi/Kg mg/Kg pCi/Kg pCi/Kg pCi/L pCi/L mg/L pci/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L.pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Normal.Range , 0.118 0.000 0.237 0.395 0.058 0.355 0.578 0~237 0.215 0.000 0.118 0.118 0.118 0.118 0.118 0.355 0.252 Mean of Analyses 23.33 50 F 00 18.33 14.67 99'3 92.00 1176.67 36.00 48.33 3.00 5.33 7.33 8.67 14.33 12.67 70.67 98.00 N.D.K.Action Level 1~15 0.00 0.81-2.69-0.45 0.35-1.50-3.46-4'0 NA NA NA NA NA-0.35-0.23-l.27 ,0.23 0.46 0.58 NA 0.58 NA 0.74 NA 0.451 102.33-0.44 NA 0.000 0.118 0.082 0.118 0.000 60.00-1.39 91.67 NA-0.81 14.00 NA-1.15 NA NA 3313.33-0'7 NA 27.67-0.81 ~I$'k 4 C' NOTES: mal.: Normalized range.As defined in"Environmental Radioactivity Lab-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~nge oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981-1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, P.0.Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114.EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.N.D.K.: Normalized deviation-of the mean from the known value.As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004. NDP: No data provided.No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.NA: Not available. Report containing ceived from EPA, Las Vegas.this data has not yet been re-Action Level: (1)Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of carrier.Corrective action: Try to improve purity of strontium carrier.strontium isolated (2)Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of carrier.Corrective action: Try to improve purity of strontium carrier.strontium isolated II I FLORIDA DBPT OF HRS-BPA ZNTBRLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1988 FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER FOOD FOOD FOOD FOOD FOOD MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK MILK WATER ATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER , WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha Beta Cs-137 Sr-90 I-131 Cs-137 K Sr-89 Sr-90 I-131 I-131 Cs-137 Cs-137 K K Sr-89 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-90 Alpha Alpha Alpha Beta Beta Beta Cr-51 Cr-51 Co-60 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-65 Ru-106 Ru-106 Cs-134 Cs-134 Cs-137 Cs-137 H-3 H-3 I-131 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-90 Media Nuclide 26 26 26 26 29 29 29 29 29 08 08 08 08 07 07 07 07 07 24 28 24 28 24 28 24 28 24 28 22 23 25 22 23 25 03 07 03 07 03 07 03 06 10 06 10 06 10 06 10 06 10 07 09 ll 07 09 11 06 10 06 10 06 10 06 10 07 03 07 03 07 10 14 05 09 06 06 10 06 10 06 10 08 12 05 05-06 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 Collection Mon Day Yr EPA Known 8 29 12 8 107 49 1240 33 34 94 91 51 50 1600 1600 40 40 60 60 15 8 9 4 10 9 302 251 15 25 101 151 195 152 20 25 25 15 5565 2316 76 115 20 20 0.35-0.69 0.35 2~3 1 0.31 0.12-1.49'~7 7-4.62 0.19-0.13-0.12-0.92-0.14-l.73-1.39-2.42-2.50-4.43-1.50-0.69 0.12 0.69 0.69 0.69-0.44-0.05 0.46 0.46-0.23 0.08-0.49 1~2 1-0.35-0.58 0.23 0.12 0.17 0.10-0.07 0.19-0.69-1.54 9.00 27.00 13.00 6.00 109.00 49.33 1186.67 25.00 28.67 95.00 90.33 50.67 47.33 1593.33 1520.00 36.00 33.00 55.67 52.33 10.67 6.00 9~33 6.00 12.00 11.00 294.33 250.33 16.33 26.33 99.67 151.67 189.33 142.33 19.00 23.33 25.67 15.33 5620.00 2336.67 75.67 116.33 18 F 00 18.67 pCi/F pCi/F pCi/F pCi/F pCi/Kg pCi/Kg mg/Kg*pCi/Kg pCi/Kg pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L mg/L mg/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L.pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L 0.000 0.237 0.000 0.790 0.108 0.355 0.669 0.237 0.296 0.132 0.197 0.118 0.355 0.148 0.296 ,0.237 0.237 0.592 0.592 0.237 0.000 0.237 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.178 0.237 0.118 0.118 0.415 0.237 0.237 0.434 0.000 0.237 0.118 0.237 0.064 0.152 0.074 0.049 0.000 0.395 Units Normal.Mean of N.D.K.Range Analyses Action Level M 9I', 4 r NOTES: rmal.: ange Normalized range.As defined in"Environmental Radioactivity Lab-oratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981-1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, P.O.Box 15027, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89114.EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.N.D.K.: Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value.As defined in EPA-600/4-81-004. NDP: No data provided.No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.NA: Not available. Report containing this data has not yet been re-ceived from EPA, Las Vegas.ACTION LEVEL: Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier.Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of strontium carrier.Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier. gpp424p361 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1 AND 2 License Nos.DPR-67, NPF-16 I Docket Nos.50-335, 50-389 Data Submitted By:Flo ida DHRS Report Prepared: o 9'/'<l 9O Report Reviewed: 2/arel A+/PWfdHP3:1 RADEHVOP.PSL 0 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS DESCRIPTION INTRODUCTION PAGE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

DEVIATIONS/MISSING DATA ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES LAND USE CENSUS EY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS DIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE FIRST QUARTER, 1989 SECOND QUARTER, 1989 THIRD QUARTER, 1989 FOURTH QUARTER, 1989 RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM, 1989 TABLE 1 TABLE 1A TABLE 1B TABLE 2 ATTACHMENT A ATTACHMENT B ATTACHMENT C HP3:1 RADENVOP.PSL 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 I.INTRODUCTION This report is submitted pursuant to Specification 6.9 of St.Lucie Unit No.1 and St.Lucie Unit No.2 Technical Specifications.

The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report provides information, summaries and analytical results pertaining to the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the calendar year indicated.

This report covers surveillance activities meeting the requirements of Unit No.1 and Unit No.2.Technical Specifications.

II.RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM A.~Pur ose: The purpose of the radiological environmental monitoring program is to provide representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides which lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of members of the public resulting from station operation.

The radiological environmental monitoring program also supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling of the environmental exposure pathways.B.Pro ram Descri tion: The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program for the St.Lucie Plant is conducted pursuant to Technical Specifications 3/4e12 of St.Lucie Unit No.1 and St.Lucie Unit No.2 Technical Specifications.

Sam le Locations T es and Fre encies: a~Direct radiation gamma exposure rate is monitored continuously at 27 locations by thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD's).TLD's are collected and analyzed quarterly.

b.Airborne radioiodine and particulate samplers are operated continuously at five locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly.Analyses include Iodine-131, gross beta, and gamma isotopic measurements.

c~Surface water samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed weekly and monthly respectively.

Analyses include gamma isotopic and tritium measurements.

HP3:1 RADEHVOP.PSL 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 d.e.Shoreline sediment samples are collected from two locations coinciding with the locations for surface water samples.Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Sediment samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

Fish and invertebrate samples are collected from two locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed semi-annually.

Fish and invertebrate samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

f.Broad leaf vegetation samples are collected from three locations.

Samples are collected and analyzed monthly.Broad leaf vegetation samples are analyzed by gamma isotopic measurements.

E Attachment A provides specific information pertaining to sample locations, types and frequencies.

2.Anal tical Res onsibilit Radiological environmental monitoring for the St.Lucie Plant is conducted by the State of Florida, Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS).Samples are collected and analyzed by HRS personnel.

Samples are analyzed at the HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory in Orlando, Florida.C.Anal tical Results: Table 1, Environmental Radiolo ical Monitorin Pro ram Annual~Summar provides a summary for all specified samples collected during the referenced surveillance period.Deviations from the sample schedule, missing data and/or samples not meeting the specified"A PRIORI" LLD, if any, are noted and explained in Tables 1A and 1B respectively.

Analysis data for all specified samples analyzed during the surveillance period is provided in Attachment B.D.Land Use Census: A land use census out to a distance of 5 miles radius from the St.Lucie Plant is conducted annually to determine the location of the nearest milk animal, residence, and garden producing broad leaf vegetation in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors.A summary of the land use census for the surveillance year is provided in Table 2, Land Use Census~Summa No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated were identified by the land use census.HP3:1 RADEHVOP.PSL (2) 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 E.No locations yielding a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway)20 4 greater than locations currently being sampled in the radiological environmental monitoring program were identified by the land use census.Interlaborator Com arison Pro ra: The State of Florida HRS Environmental Radiation Control Laboratory participates in the Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program conducted by the Environmental Protection Agency.Results from the Interlaboratory Comparison Program are provided in Attachment C.III.DISCUSSION AND INTERPRETATION OF RESULTS A.Re ortin of Results: The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report contains the summaries, interpretations and information required by the St.Lucie Plant, Unit Nos.1&2 Technical Specifications.

Table 1 provides a summary of the measurements made for the nuclides required by Technical Specifications, Table 4.12-1, for all samples specified by Table 3.12-1.In addition, summaries are provided for other nuclides identified in the specified samples, including those not related to station operation.

These include nuclides such as K-40, Th-232, Ra-226, Ra-228, and Be-7 which are common in the Florida environment.

B.Inter retation of Results Direct Radiation:

The results for direct radiation monitoring are consistent with past measurements for the specified locations.

The exposure rate data shows no indication of any trends attributed to effluents from the plant.The measured exposure rates are consistent with exposure rates that were observed during the preoperational surveillance program.Direct radiation monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.2~Air Particulates Radioiodine:

The results for radioactive air particulate and radioiodine monitoring are consistent with past measurements and indicate no trends attributed to plant effluents.

All samples for radioiodine yielded no detectable I-131.Gamma isotopic measurements yielded no indication of any nuclides attributed to station operation.

The results for air particulate/radioiodine samples are consistent with measurements which were made during the preoperational surveillance program.Air particulate and radioiodine monitoring results are summarized in Table 1.HP3:1 RAOEHVOP.PSL (3) l e 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 3~Surface Water: The results for radioactivity measurements in surface water samples are consistent with past measurements.

Tritium was reported as present in four of the weekly surface water samples collected from Site H-15 and one of the monthly surface water samples at site H-59.Subsequent samples indicate there has been no increase nor adverse trend for tritium in surface water samples at H-15.The highest measured tritium was at site H-59 and was less than 14 of the reporting level specified by plant technical specifications, Table 3.12-2.No other nuclides attributed to station operation were detected.Results for surface water samples are summarized in Table 1.4~5.Waterborne Sediment and Food Products: The results for radioactivity measurements in waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program.There were no indications of any radionuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the waterborne sediment, fish and crustacea samples are summarized in Table 1.Broad Leaf Ve etation: The results for radioactivity measurements in broad leaf vegetation are consistent with past measurements and with measurements made during the preoperational surveillance program.There were no indications of any nuclides attributed to plant effluents.

Results for the broad leaf vegetation samples are summarized in Table 1.C.Conclusions The data obtained through the St.Lucie Plant Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program verifies that the levels of radiation and concentrations of radioactive materials in environmental samples, representing the highest potential exposure pathways to members of the public, are not being increased.

The measurements verify that the dose or dose commitment to members of the public, due to operation of St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 6 2, during the surveillance year, are well within"as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA)" criteria established by 10 CFR 50, Appendix I.IIP3:1 RADENVOP.PSL (4)

Page 1 of 8~r ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL StBQGLRY Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos 1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanua 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)PATHWAY DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD UNITS: MICRO-R/hr Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Mean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Exposur e d Rate, 108 5.3 (108/108)4.5-6.7 NW-10 10 miles, NW 6.5 (4/4)6.4-6.7 6.1 (4/4)6.0-6.2 Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 Page 2 of 8e~-T 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period, Janua 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES UNITS PICO-Ci/M Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Mean f Control Zacatjons Mean (f)Range 131?260 Gross Beta, 260 Composite Gamma Isotopic, 20 Be 40~134C 137C 0.024 0.0025 0.0052 0.012 0.00069 0.00066<MDA 0.011 (260/260)0.003-0.024 0.099 (20/20)0.066-0.126<MDA<MDA MDA H-08 6 miles, WNW H-34 0.5 miles, N 0.013 (52/52)0.003-0.024 0.105 (4/4)0.075-0.123<MDA 0.011 (52/52)0.003-0.020 0.095 (4/4)0.066-0.118 MDA<MDA<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 Page 3 of 8 r PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER UNITS: PICO-Ci/LITER T 1 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Janua 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Mean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Tritium, 64 Gamma Isotopic, 64 230 102 (5/64)90-130 H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE 130 (1/12)130 (1/12)40K'4Mn 5'Fe 58Co 60Co Zn Zr-Nb 131I 134C 137C 140B 60 325 (64/64)220-420<MDA MDA MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA MDA MDA MDA H-15 329 (52/52)<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 220-420 310 (12/12)240-400<MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 T 1 Page 4 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MO ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL SUMMA Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanua 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, DRY Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Mean f Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest'nnual Mean Name Control Locations Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 226R 232T Be 58Co 60Co 134C 137C 140 49 52 100 12 14 12 525 (4/4)270-740 253 (4/4)197-311 108 (2/4)96-119<MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE 119 (1/2)H-15 680 (2/2)<1 mi.ENE/E/ESE 620-740 H-59 254 (2/2)10-20 mi, S/SSE 197-311 370 (2/2)270-470 254 (2/2)197-311 119 (1/2)<MDA MDA<MDA MDA<MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 Page 5 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON ORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Januar 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, WET Type and Total Numb'er of Analyses Performed Gamma Isotopic, 4 4'K 226R 228 54Mn 59F 58Co 60co Zn 134C 137C Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)130 20 16 19 17 All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range 1298 (4/4)490-2060 180 (4/4)86-370 294 (2/4)177-410<MDA<MDA<MDA<MDA MDA<MDA<MDA Distance&Direction Range H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE 1965 (2/2)1870-2060 H-15 250 (2/2)<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 129-370 H-15 294 (2/2)<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE 177-410 Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Mean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range 1965 (2/2)1870-2060 110 (2/2)86-135 MDA MDA MDA MDA<MDA MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 T 1~~~~Page 6 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MON RING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanua 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

FISH UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, WET Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Mean f Control Locations Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 4 40K 226R 228 54Mn 59Fe 5'Co 60Co 65~134C 137C 130 20 16 10 17 3200 (4/4)2710-4180 78 (1/4)93 (1/4)<MDA<MDA<MDA MDA MDA MDA MDA H-15<1 mi, ENE/E/ESE H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE 3445 (2/2)2710-4180 78 (1/4)93 (1/4)2955 (2/2)2910-3000 78 (1/4)93 (1/4)MDA MDA MDA MDA<MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 TP 1 Page 7 of 8 0 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida Reporting Period Zanuar 1-December 31 1989 (County, State)PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION UNITS: PICO-Ci/Kg, WET Type and Total Number of Analyses Performed Lower Limit of Detection (LLD)All Indicator Locations Mean (f)Range Mean f Distance&Direction Range Location with Highest Annual Mean Name Control Locations Mean (f)Range Gamma Isotopic, 36 Be 40K 226 131I 134C 137C 71 100 26 416 (36/36)280-830 2930 (36/36)810-4480 29 (1/36)MDA<MDA<MDA H-52 1 mi, S/SSE H-52 1 mi, S/SSE H-59 10-20 mi, S/SSE 461 (12/12)300-740 3500 (12/12)2200-4480 29 (1/12)425 (12/12)310-830 2820 (12/12)1970-4200 29 (1/12)<MDA MDA MDA Number of Nonroutine Reported Measurements

=0 TABLE 1 Page 8 of 8 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL

SUMMARY

Name of Facility St.Lucie Unit Nos.1 and 2 Docket No.(s)50-335 and 50-389 Location of Facility St.Lucie Florida (County, State)Reporting Period Januar 1-December 31 1989 NOTES a~The LLD is an"a priori" lower limit of detection which establishes the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count above system background that will be detected with 954 probability with only 5%probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation, represents a real signal.LLD's in this column are at time of measurement.

The MDAs reported in Attachment B for the individual samples have been corrected to the time of sample collection.

~~~~~b.Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only.Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f).C~Specific identifying information for each sample location is provided in Attachment

-A.d.Results are based upon the average net response of two TLDs.(Thermoluminescent dosimeters).

MDA refers to minimum detectable activity.

C 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT, UNIT NOS.1&2 TABLE 1A A)Pathway: Airborne DEVIATIONS MISSING DATA Location: H-08, 6 miles WNW Date: 02/21/89 to 02/28/89 Deviation:

Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location for the fourth week of February 1989.Description of Problem: The sample had a low collected volume with a normal as found flow rate.A power interruption is suspected.

Estimated sampling duration of 111 hours0.00128 days <br />0.0308 hours <br />1.835317e-4 weeks <br />4.22355e-5 months <br /> out of the 169 hour0.00196 days <br />0.0469 hours <br />2.794312e-4 weeks <br />6.43045e-5 months <br /> period.Corrective Action: The sampling equipment was inspected and verified as operating properly.B)Pathway: Airborne Location: H-08, 6 miles WNW Date: 03/07/89 to 03/14/89 Deviation:

Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location for the second week of March 1989.Description of Problem: Corrective Action: 1)2)C)Pathway: Airborne Air sample pump found running backwards, due to internal motor failure.Estimated duration of failure is 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br />.Reviewed prior sample data to verify unaffected sampling period, especially Feb.21-28, 1989 period.Replace sampling pump-motor combination.

Location: H-30, 2 miles W Date: 07/11/89 to 07/18/89 Deviation:

Failure to continuously provide air sampling at this location.Description of Problem: Electrical circuit breaker found tripped at end of sample period.Lightning suspected cause.Corrective Action: Reset breaker, inspected sampling equipment and verified as operating properly.

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1&2 TABLE 1B ANALYSES WITH LLDs ABOVE TABLE 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES 1 1 89-12 31 89 The values specified in Table 4.12-1,'etection Capabilities, were achieved for all samples.

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 TABLE 2 LAND USE CENSUS DISTANCE TO NEAREST (a, b)Sector 6/89 Milk (c)Animal 6/89 Residence 6/89 Garden (d)NNE NE ENE 0 (e)0 0,SSE SSW SW WSW NNW L (f)4.3/182 L L 4.2/254 4.5/266 L 4.9/306 L 0 1.5/141 (g)3.5/152 (g)3.2/191 2.2/213 1.9/236 1.9/245 (11)1.9/260 2.3/281 3.5/304 L (g)3.8/202 1.9/234 1.9/258 2.1/275 3.2/283 3.7/306 L 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNIT NOS.1 AND 2 TABLE 2 NOTES LAND USE CENSUS (a)All categories surveyed out to 5 miles radius from the St.Lucie Plant (b)The following format is used to denote the location: distance (miles)/bearing (degrees)For example, a residence located in the southeast sector at a distance of 1.5 miles bearing 141 degrees is recorded as 1.5/141.(c)Potential milk animal locations.

All locations specified have been verified to be not producing milk for human consumption.(d)Gardens with an estimated growing area of 500 square feet or more., 0 denotes that the sector area is predominantly an'ocean area.L denotes that the sector area is predominantly a land area unoccupied by the category type.(g)Non-residential occupied buildings in this sector include the following:

SSE-Fire Station, 1.8/149 SSE-Country Club, 3.4/153 NNW-Lifeguard station at beach, 4.6/342 SE-Lifeguard station at beach, 1.1/132 (h)Several residences in this sector are located approximately 1.9 miles from the St.Lucie Plant.

I 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT A KEY TO SAMPLE LOCATIONS 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1&2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: DIRECT RADIATION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

TLD SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

QUARTERLY Location Name N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W-2 W-5-10 SW-2 SW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 Direction Sector N NNW NNW NW WNW WNW W W W WSW WSW WSW SW SW SW SSW SSW SSW S S SSE SSE SSE SE Approximate Distance miles 10 3 5 10 2 5 9 2 5 10 2 5 10 3 6 8 5 10 10 5 10 1 Descri tion A1A, North of Blind Creek South of Pete Stone Creek Coast Guard Station Indian River Dr., at Rio Vista Dr.S.R.68 at S.R.607 Cemetery South of 7107 Indian River Dr.U.S.1 at S.R.712 S.R.70, West of Turnpike 7609 Indian River Drive Oleander and Sager Street Interstate 95 at S.R.709 8503 Indian River Dr.Prima Vista at Yacht Club Del Rio at Davis Street 9207 Indian River Drive U.S.1 at Village Green Dr.Port St.Lucie Blvd.at Cairo Rd.10307 Indian River Drive U.S.1 at Port St.Lucie Blvd.Pine Valley at Westmoreland Rd.13179 Indian River Drive U.S.1 at S.R.714 Indian River Dr.at Quail Run Lane Entrance to Nettles Island Elliot Museum South of Cooling Canal H-32 Control: NNW 19 University of Florida IFAS Vero Beach I 4 8 p>>1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1&2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: AIRBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

RADIOIODINE AND PARTICULATES SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

WEEKLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion H-08.H-14 H-30 SE FPL Substation, Weatherby Rd.On-Site, Near South Property Lane Power Line, 7609 Indian River Drive H-34 Control: H-12 N 0.5 12 On-Site at Meteorology Tower FPL Substation, SR-76 Stuart 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1&2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: WATERBORNE SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SURFACE WATER (OCEAN)SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

H-15 WEEKLY, H-59 MONTHLY Location Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance miles Descri tion H-15 H-59 Control:: ENE/E/SSE S/SSE 10-20 Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED:

SHORELINE SEDIMENT SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY ocation Name Direction Sector Approximate Distance Descri tion H-15 ENE/E/ESE Atlantic Ocean, Public Beaches East Side A1A H-59 Control: S/SSE 10-20 South Endg Hutchinson Island

I 1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT UNIT NOS.1&2 Key to Sample Locations PATHWAY: INGESTION SAMPLES COLLECTED:

CRUSTACEA AND FISH SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

SEMI-ANNUALLY H-15 H-59 Control: Location Name Direction Sector ENE/E/ESE S/SSE Approximate Distance miles 10-20 Descri tion Ocean Side, Vicinity of St.Lucie Plant South End, Hutchinson Island SAMPLES COLLECTED:

BROAD LEAF VEGETATION SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY:

MONTHLY H-51 H-52 H-59 Control: Location Name Direction Sector N/NNW S/SSE S/SSE Approximate Distance 10-20 Descri tion Off-site Near North Property Line Off-Site Near South Property Line South End, Hutchinson Island

~.~~.-.w l~~~~s~~~CZL1 4+~~-.~r 0>tta))'l I~~~I III.c\~,'l hl 6 Vl I m'D O O I Iv O O g m 9 cn/O 3 Ng/A N A/VEh~plant Vents 202 7n el>~--Fuel Bldg Vents~/109.5 l l elv~8 f P Xl>O r W C rn Vl I p~Q 2.r~C p h g p po 2 I X r~~>O mm~mr EA~p~~l~<r'-g g tQ~Ul V jp.ao gge Public Access to Beach)0 0~~hg~i 5 8 i~~o>"r o'A)H'I.+-~Ul I l (p i Z I D Public Access lo Aeach

~, I v Cla I/gI5~*('~.~~5~(~~'I'.'IOI'~t*r~s~!I t<<~~~~~I.~, 4~~I'l~((e~~~5 XS~I." Al OII W~J~%~~)(~V 0 oi5\'I g/lit 5O IO<<(([if ill I V~L~~(~~4'I~~~o)t.I(~I~a I~>>4~05M!~~I~~

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT B RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE 1989 First Quarter, 1989 Second Quarter, 1989 Third Quarter, 1989 Fourth Quarter, 1989 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POMER AND I IGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE First Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST.LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling First Quarter, 1989 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Weekly Meekly 65 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Mater 3.b Shoreline sediment Weekly Nonthly Semiannually 13 3 3*~~~4.Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Honthly Total: 220*-Includes DOE split samples.NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.0 Measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

ST.LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SANPLING First Quarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-(micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Site N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW"5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW-5 WNW"10 W"2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10~SW-2 SW-5 SW"10 SSW-2 SSW"5 SSW-10 S-5 S"10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE"1 H-32 Deployment Collection 5.1+0'5.4 x 0.3 5.6 a 0.3 5.2 4 0.3 6'+0'5.2 a 0.3 5.4+0.3 F 7+0'5.4~0.3 5.2+0.3 5.2~0.3 4'~0'5'+0.3 4'+0'5.0~0.3 4.6 a 0.2 5.0*0.3 5.1+0.3 5'+0'5'4 0'5.2 x 0.3 4.9+0.3 5'+0.3 5'~0.3 5.1+0'4.9+0.3 F 1+0'12-14"88 03-22-89 Notes: (A)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.(B)Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

2'IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m3)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 01-03-89 01-11-89 01-18-89 01"25-89 01-31"89 02-08-89 02-14-89 02-21-89 02-28-89 03-07-89 03-14-89 03-21-89 03-28-89<0,02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.04(A)<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02(B)<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0'02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0'2<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0'2<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02 (A)-This sample had a low collected volume with a normal flowrate.A power outage is suspected.

The equipment is estimated to have run for 111 hours0.00128 days <br />0.0308 hours <br />1.835317e-4 weeks <br />4.22355e-5 months <br /> out of the 169 total hours for this sampling interval.(B)-Upon collection of this sample, the air pump was found to be running backwards due to an internal failure.The air pump is estimated to have run backwards for 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> out ef the 168 total hours for this sampling interval.After this malfunction, the particulate filter collected from this site on 02-28-89 was re" examined, but there was no sign that the pump had run backwards during the collection of that sample.

2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA-(Ci/m3)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 01-03-89 01-11-89 01-18-89 01-25-89 01-31-89 02-08-89 02-14-89 02-21-89 02-28-89 03-07-89 03-14-89 03-21-89 03-28-89 0.010 0.016 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.005 0.015 0.010 (A0.009 0.003 (B0.012 0.016 0.008 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002+0.002 a 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.005 0.008 0.006 0.015 0.010 0.005 0.017 0.007 0.014 0.008 0.012 0.010 0.008 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002,+0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.007+0.010 0.008 0.009+0.008*0.004*0.017*0.010*0.014 0.006 0.011+0.012+0.004 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0'08+0.008 0.010~0.010 0.008 0.007 a 0.013 0.008 0.013 0.006~0.012+0.010+0.008 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.008 0.009 0.006 0.009 0.007 0.007 0.017 0.006 0.016<0 0.012 0.014 0.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002.005 0.002 0.002 0.002 Neans: 0.010 w 0;001 0.010+'.001 0.009~0.001 0.009 i 0.001 0.010+0.001*-DOE split samples.A-This sample had a low collected volume with a normal flowrate.A power outage is sus-pected.The eguipment is estimated to have run for 111 hours0.00128 days <br />0.0308 hours <br />1.835317e-4 weeks <br />4.22355e-5 months <br /> out of the 169 total hours for this sampling interval.B-The air pump is estimated to have run backwards for 9 hours1.041667e-4 days <br />0.0025 hours <br />1.488095e-5 weeks <br />3.4245e-6 months <br /> out of the 168 total hours for this sampling interval.After this malfunction, the filter collected from this site on 02-28-89 was re-examined, but there was no sign that a similar malfunction occurred then.2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GANNA SCANS OF QUARTERLY CONPOSITES

-(Ci/m)First Quarter, 1989 Sample Site Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.104 0.118 0.126 0.111 0.121 0.008 0.008~0.009 0.008 0.009<0.015<0.013<0.016<0.015<0.025<0.0009<0.0008'0.0009

<0.0006<0.0007<0.0006<0.0007<0.0007<0.0006<0.0007 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci'/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 Ba-140 K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)(B)H15 01-03-89<150 01"11-89 110 R 50 01-18-89<170 01"25-89<150 02-01-89<130 02-08-89<130 02"14-89<130 02-21-89 90~40 02-28-89<130 03-08-89<130 03-'15-89<130 03-21-89<140 03-28-89<130 310 x 50 280 k 50 290 N 50 310 50 350 a 50 230~50 290+50 320 4 50 390+50 270 a 50 280 i 50 300+50 310 50<4<5<4<4<4<3<5<4<3<4<4<7<4<9<4<12<4<9<5<6<4<8<3<10<4<9<4<9<3<8<4<10<4<8<3<10<5<4<5<5<4<5<4<4<5<5<5<5<10<7<6<10<8<6<8<8<7<9<7<6<10<9<7<11<7<6<9<7<9<9<8<7<10<7<5<11<7<6<7<5<8<7<7<7<9<9<6<5<3<5<5<4<5<5<4<5<4<5<3<4<4<5<4<4<4<4<4<5<7<9<9<6<6<6<8<8<6<6<6<4 H59 01-04-89<150 260+40<4<9<4<5<9<7<6 02"01-89<130 280 R 50<5<8<5<4<10<9<7 03-01-89<130 240+40<4<10<5<4<12<5<7<5<5<6<5<4<6<7<4<6 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs,.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

3.b EDINENT-(Ci/k dr wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15*H59 02-01-89<80 02-01-89<80*-DOE split sample.620 70<5 470 4.60<8<9<6<10<9<8 221~9 311~12 96+13 119+23 4.a.l CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Rn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Ce-134 Ce-137 Ra-226 H15 01"03-89 H59 02-15-89.<18 135~17 This sample was accidentally thrown out before it was analyzed.A new sample will be collected.

2060 R 1'70<16<36<19<19<41<17 4.a.2 FISH-Nixed S ecies-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 H15 03-15-89 2710+160<12<26<9<12<25<11<12<29 H59 03-01-89 3000 160<12<27<13<14<26<13<13<35 4.b.1 BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Man rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Ca-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 H51 01-04"89 370 R 40 2460+120<7<7<8<20 02-01-89 410+40 2470~120<7<9<8<20 03"01-89 280 i 40 810+100<9<10<10<22 H52 01-04-89 430+40 2730 i 110<8<7<7<42 02-01-89 410+40 2840 R 120<7<9<7<18 03-01-89 430 i 60 3120 A 170<13<15<11<34 H59 01-04"89 390+30 2010 S 100<8 02-01-89 310 R 50 1970~120<8 03-01-89 310+50 2170 R 140<12<8<10<10<10<28<6<35<9 29+7 7 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POWER AND I IGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE Second Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST.LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Second Quarter, 1989 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3.b Shoreline sediment Weekly Monthly Semiannually 13 3 0 4.Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 214*-Includes NRC split samples.NOTE: Measurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Neasurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

ST.IUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Second Quarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs-(micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Deployment 03-22-89 Site Collection 06-14-89 N-1 NNW-5 NNW" 10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW"5 WNW"10 W"2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW"5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW"10 S"5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H-32 5.3+4.9 S.3+5.4+6.4+5.1+S.l 5.6 5'+5 7+5.3+5'+5.2+4.5+5.1+5.0+S.O~5.1+S.O+5.3~4.7~4.8+4.7 a 5'+S.l 4.9+6.2+0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3., 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.2 0.3 0.3.'.3 0'Notes: (A)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.

(8)Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

" IODINE-131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m)Collection Date HOB H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 04-05"89 04-11-89 04-18"89 04-25-89 05-02-89 05-09-89 05-16-89 05-23-89 05-31-89 06-06-89 06-13-89 06-20-89 06-27-89<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<Oo02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02 2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 04-05-89 04-11-89 04-18-89 04-25-89 05-02-89 05-09-89 05-16-89 05-23-89 05-31-89 06-06-89 06-13-89,.

06-20-89 06-27-89 0.011 0.010 0.005 0.019 0.016 0.014 0.021 0.009 0.015 0.013 0.018 0.021 0.011 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 a 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.009 0.013 0-.003 0.015 0.016 0.017 0.014 0.012 0.016 0.011 0.013 0.015 0.010 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002+0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.008 0.011 0.005+0.012*0.016+*0.014+*0.015+*0.012 0.016+0.010 0.012 0.013+0.008 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.009 0.009+0.007 4 0.017 0.018 0.018+0.018 0.009 0.014 0.013+0.015+0.020 0.012 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.010 0.010 0.006 0.016 0.016 0.016 0.015 0.012 0.016 0.010 0.014 0.015 0.011 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 Means: 0.014+0.001 0.013+0.001 0.012~0.001 0.014 w 0.001 0.013 w 0.001*-NRC split samples.2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES

-(Ci/m)Sample Site Be-7 Second Quarter, 1989 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34'.108 0.113+0.110 0.109 0.123 0.008 0.009 0.009 0.010 0.009<0.014<0.014<0.016<0.016<0.014<0.0009<0.0007<0.0009<0.0008<0.0006<0.0007<0.0007<0.0007<0.0006<0.0009 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95.Ba-140 K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)(B)H15 04-06-89 04-11-89 04-18-89 04-25-89 05-03-89 05"09-89 05-16-89 05-23-89 05-31-89 06-06-89 06-13-89 06-20-89 06-27-89<140<140<140<140<120<130<130 90 a 40<130<130 90 a 40.<130<130 300+50 310+50 360 w 50 310 i 50 320 a 30 270+30 300+40 290+30 320 a 50 320+40 260+40 220+40 340 a 40<5<3<4<4<3<3<3<5<3<4<3<9<4<11<4<7<5<8<4<7<3<7<3<10<4<6<3<11<5<11<4<9<4<Q<4<10<5<5<5<5<4<4<5<3<5<4<5<9<7<9<7<10<7<10<8<6<5<7~<5<ll<7<7<5<8<8<11<5<11<7<12<6<10<6<6<8<6<7<4<5<8<4<7<7<9<7<9<5<4<5<5<3<3<3<3<5<5<6<3<5<5<5<3<3<4<4<4<4<4<4<7<7<6<6<6<4<7<5<7<5<6<4<7 H59 04-06-89<140 250 E 50<5<8<4<5<11<7<5 05-03-89<120 310 e 30<3<6<3<3<7<4<5 06-01-89<130 300+40<3<9<4<6<8<6<7<5<3<5<3 K3<6 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct mea-urement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4.a.1~~CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 H15 04-17-89 770 5 260<51<82<48<54<85 Cs-134<50 Cs-137<45 Ra-226 370+80 Ra-228 410+70 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Man rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51.04"06-89 350 s 40 1650 N 100<8<7<8 05-03"89 06-01-89 560 60 4040 170 320+30 1530 L 80<8<10<6<6 H52 04-06"89 05-03-89 06-01"89 740 4 60 2670+150 650+50 4480 4.170 300 k 40 2200+110<10<9<12<10<8<9<8 H59 04-06-89 390 I 50 2400 i 140<9<10<9 05-03-89 06"01-89 520+40 2430~130 380+40 2120 N 100<10<9<8<7<9<7 6 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POMER AND LIGHT CONPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE Third Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services C

ST.LUCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Third Quarter, 1989 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Weekly Weekly 65 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3.b Shoreline Sediment Weekly Honthly Semiannually 13 3 3*~~4.Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.1 Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Honthly Total: 219*-Includes NRC split samples.NOTE: Heasurement results having magnitudes that are significantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.Heasurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true activity in the sample.

ST.LVCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Third Qrarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Site Deployment Collection 06-14-89 09-14-89 Notes: N-1 NNW"5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW"2 WNW-5 WNW-10 W"2 W-5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW-10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW-2 SSW-5 SSW-10 S"5 S-10 S/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE"1 H-32 5'+0.3 5.3~0.3 F 6+0.3 5.3 0.3 6.5 c 0.3 5.2+0.3 5.5+0.3 6.0 4 0.3 5.6 a 0.3 5.5 a 0.3 5'+0.3 5'i 0.3 5.4 a 0.3 4's 0.3 5.4 x 0.3 4.9~0.3 5.3 0.3 5.3+0.3 5.2 N 0.3 5.1 i 0.3 5.0 a 0.3 5.0 a 0.3 4.9 a 0.3 5.4 a 0.3 5'0.3 5.0 a 0.3 6.2 a 0.3 (A)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.(B)Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

2 0

IODINE"131 IN WEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H3407-05-89 07-11-89 07-18-89 07-25-89 08-01-89 08-08-89 08-15-89 08"23-89 08-29-89 09-05-89 09-13-89 09-19-89 09-26-89<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0'2<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02'0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.02(A)<0.02 (A)-Electrical power was off at the end of this sample due to a tripped circuit breaker.Lightning is suspected to be the cause.The equipment is estimated to have run for 132 hours0.00153 days <br />0.0367 hours <br />2.18254e-4 weeks <br />5.0226e-5 months <br /> out of the 171 total hours for this sampling interval.3 8

2.b AIR PARTICULATES GROSS BETA-(Ci/m3)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 07-05-89 07-11-89 07-18-89 07"25"89 08-01-89 08-08-89 08-15-89 08-23-89 08"29-89 09-05-89 09-13-89 09-19"89 09-26"89 0.007 0.015 0.014 0.006 0.011 0.016 0.005 0.013 0.010 0.008 0.014 0.006 0.005 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.006 0.018 0.009 0.005 0.010 0.012<0 0.010 0.011 0.005 0.013 0.005 0.007+0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002.005 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002+0.002 0.005 0.016 0.007<0*0.010*0.013*0.006*0.008 0.011 0.010 0.012 0.007 0.004 0 0+0.005+0+0~0 0+0+0+0 0 a 0.001.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.002.001 0.009 0.015 (A0.009 0.004~0.007 0.014~0.008 0.009 0.011+0.006 0.013 0.006+0.009 0.001 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.009 0.012 0.008 0.003 0.013 0.013 0.006 0.010 0.010+0.005 0.008 0.006 0.009 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.002 Means: 0.010 0.001 0.009~0.001 0.009~0.001 0.009~0.001 0.009~0.001*-NRC split samples.(A)-Electrical power was off at the end of this sample due to a tripped circuit breaker.Lightning is suspected to be the cause.The equipment is estimated to have run for 132 hours0.00153 days <br />0.0367 hours <br />2.18254e-4 weeks <br />5.0226e-5 months <br /> out of the 171 total hours for this sampling interval.2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GAMMA SCANS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES

-(Ci/m3)Sample Site Be-7 Third Quarter, 1989 K"40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.080 0.066 0.094 0.068 0.075 0.007 0.006 0.008 0.008 0.007<0.015<0.013<0.017<0.014<0.012<0.0009<0.0009<0.0005<0.0007<0.0008<0.0008<0.0006<0.0008<0.0007<0.0005 3.a SURFACE WATER-(Ci/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 Ba-140~, K-40 Hn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 H15 07-06-89 07-11-89 07-18-89 07-25-89 08-01-89 08-08;89 08-16-89 08-23-89 08-29-89 09-06-89 09.-13-89 09"19-89 09-26-89<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<140<140<140<140 390+420+380 350 350+380 370+380 370 340 340~370+350+50<4 40<4 40<4 40<4 40<4 40<4 40<4 40<4 40<4 40<3 40<3 40<4 40<4<9<3<8<4<12<4<8<4<8<4<9<3<8<3<11<4<10<4<10<4<10<3<11<4<ll<4<4<6<4<3<5<5<4<5<5<4<5<4 (A)<9<8<6<9<7<7<10<7<5<6<6<6<10<5<6<9<7<4<10<7<5<9<7<6<10<7<6<8<7<6<10<5<7<8<5<6<9<8<5<4<4<4<4<5<5<5<5<5<4<4<4<3<4<4<4<5<4<4<4<4<5<4 (B)<5<8<3<4<7<6<7<7<4<7<3<5<6 H59 07-06-89<130 08-01-89<130 09-06-89<140 270~40<4 340+40<4 400~40<4<6<3<8<4<10<4<5<4<4<9<7<7<11<8<6<8<6<5<6<5<3<5<3<3<5<4<6 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

l 3.b SEDIMENT-(Ci/k dr wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-7 K-40 Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Th-232 H15*08-02-89<70 740 i 60<9<9<10<8 283+21<63 H59 08-02-89<70 270~50<6<9<7<8 197+12<45*-HRC split sample.'.a.l CRUSTACEA-Blue Crab-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site.Date K-40 Nn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 08-04-89 490+80<13<25<10<13<27<14<12 129+ll 177+35 H59 08-05"89 1870 4 190<20<51<19<16<39<22<18 86 4 13<120 4.a.2 FISH-Mixed S ecies-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Hn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228 H15 Attempts to collect this sample were unsuccessful.

Additional attempts will be made.H59 08-08-89 2910+150<13<28<9<12<28<12<13 78+10 93+19 4.b.l BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Nan rove-(Ci/k wet wei ht)Sample Collection Sita Data Be-7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 07-06-89 330+50 3800+160<14<13<10 08-01-89 09-06-89 340+40 3520+160 380+40 2910+130<9<8<8<9<8 H52 07-06-89 460+50 4280+150<12<9 08-01-89 09-06-89 350+50 4360+160 510+50 3660+150<9<8<9<8<9<8 H59 07-06"89 420 4 50 3130+150<12<12<10 08-01-89 09-06-89 830+50 420+50 4200+170 4200 s 160<9<12<9<9 RADIOLOGICAL SURVEILLANCE OF FLORIDA POMER AND LIGHT COMPANY'S ST.LUCIE SITE Fourth Quarter, 1989 Office of Radiation Control Florida Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services ST.I.UCIE SITE Technical Specifications Sampling Fourth Quarter, 1989 Sam le T e Collection Fre uenc Locations Number of~Sam led~Sam les 1.Direct Radiation Quarterly 27 54 2.Airborne 2.a Air Iodines 2.b Air Particulates Weekly Weekly es 69*3.Waterborne 3.a Surface Water 3;b Shoreline Sediment Weekly Monthly Semiannually 13 3 0 4.Ingestion 4.a Fish and Invertebrates 4.a.l Crustacea 4.a.2 Fish Semiannually Semiannually 4.b Food Products 4.b.l Broadleaf Vegetation Monthly Total: 214*-Includes NRC split samples.NOTE: Measurement results having maqnitudes that are sianificantly above the background of the measurement system are reported as net values plus or minus a one-standard-deviation error term.measurement results that are not significantly above background are reported as"non-detectable" (ND)or as less than a Lower Limit of Detection (<LLD), which is an estimated upper limit (with at least 95K confidence) for the true'activity in the sample.

ST.LUCIE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS SAMPLING Fourth Qrarter, 1989 DIRECT RADIATION-TLDs (micro-R/hour)

Each result is the average net response of two dosimeters.

Sample Site Deployment Collection 09-14"89 12-13-89 N-1 NNW-5 NNW-10 NW-5 NW-10 WNW-2 WNW"5 WNW" 10 W-2 W"5 W-10 WSW-2 WSW-5 WSW"10 SW-2 SW-5 SW-10 SSW"2 SSW"5 SSW-10 S-5 S-10/SSE-10 SSE-5 SSE-10 SE-1 H"32 5.3 4.9 5.4 5.5 6.5 5.1 5.1 5.5 5.3 5.5 5.2 5.4 5.2 4.7 5'5.1 5'5.3 5'5.5 5.1 F 1 4.8 5.5 5.2 4.9 6.0 a 0.3 i 0.3 a 0.3 x 0.3 a 0.3 i 0.3 i 0.3 i 0.3 0.3*0.3 i 0.3 a 0.3 x 0.3 a 0.2 a 0.3 x 0.3 a 0.3 0.3 0.3 x 0.3 x 0.3 a 0.3 a 0.3 0.3 a 0.3*0.3 a 0.3 Notes: ('A)These results have been determined with the assumption that fading is negligible, although detailed testing to confirm this has not been completed.(B)Testing to confirm compliance with NRC Reg.Guide 4.13 and ANSI N545-1975 performance standards has not been completed.

l 0 2.a IODINE-131 IN MEEKLY AIR FILTERS-(Ci/m3)Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 10-03"89 10-10-89 10-17-89 10-25-89 11-01-89 11-07-89 11-14-89 11-21-89 11"29"89 12-05"89 12-12-89 12-19-89 12-27-89<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0'2<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0~02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.01<0.02<0.03 (<0.02<0.01<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.02<0.03<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02<0.03<0.02 2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GROSS BETA-(Ci/m)-Collection Date H08 H12 Sam le Site H14 H30 H34 10-03-89 10"10-89 10-17-89 10-25-89'11-01-89 11-07-89 11-14-89 11-21-89 11-29-89 12-05"89 12-12-89 12"19-89 12-27-89 0.012 0.012 o.ooe 0.019 0.010 0.024 0.014 0.019 0.016 0.016 0.014 0.015 0.014+0.002 0.002 0.002~0.002 0.002+0.003 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.010 0.010 0.004 0.015 0.004 0.012 0.013 0.017 0.014 0.015 0.009 0.011 0.020+0.002 0.002 0.001 0.002 0.001 0.002+0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.011 0.011 0.007 0.012*0.006*0.009*0.012*0.015 0.014 0.014 0.012 0.011 0.016 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002+0.002 0.009 0.009 0.005 0.013 0.008 0.010+0.009 0.016 0.021+0.013 0.012 0.015 0.014 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.011 0.009 0.008 0.011 0.007 (A0.013 (A0.013 0.019 0.017 0.013 0.012 0.010 0.018 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002 0.002+0.002 Neans: 0.015 0.001 0.012 i 0.001 0.012~0.001 0.012 w 0.001 0.012~0.001*-NRC split samples.(A)-Due to a procedural error, the changing date for the particulate filter at H34 was 11-09-89.The charcoal filter cartridge was changed on 11-07-89.Although the changing dates were different, there was no gap in the continuous monitoring by these filters.2.b AIR PARTICULATES

-GANNA SCANS OF QUARTERLY CONPOSITES

-(Ci/m3)Sample Site Be-7 Fourth Quarter, 1989 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 H08 H12 H14 H30 H34 0.084 0.082 o.n90 0.089 0.102 o.noe 0.007 0.008 0.007 0.008<0.014<0.015<0.013<0.013<0.013<0.0008<0.0007<0.0005<0.0009<0.0006<U.OOO8<0.0007<0.0007<0.0006<n.oooe 3.a SURFACE MATER-(Ci/1)Sample Collection Site Date H-3 Zr-95 Ba-146 K-40 Hn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 La-140 (A)(B)H15 10-04-89 10-10-89 10-17-89 10-25-89 11-02-89 11-08-89 11-15-89 11"22-89 11-28-89 12-06-89 12-12-89 12-19"89 12-27-89<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130<130 380+370+270 360 300+330 370 300-4.400+350 380+250+350+40<4 40<5 40<3 40<4 30<2 40<4 40<4 40<3 40<4 40<3 40<4 40<4 40<4<9<4<8<4<11<5<11<4<7<3<9<4<10<5<10<3<10<4<10<3<5<ll<4<8<4<5<5<5<3<4<4<5<5<4<5<6<10<7<6<12<7<6<8<8<6<9<6<12<6<5<5<9<7<6<8<8<7<ll<6<5<11<6<6<6<9<7<10<6<7<10<8<8<10<5<7<4<4<4<4<3<3<5<4<4<5<5<4<4<3<4<3<4<4<5<4<4<4<5<7<7<8<6<4<3<6<6<5<7<5<7<5 H59 10-04-89 130+40 370+40<3<10<4<4<9<7<5 11"08-89<130 380 4 40<3<7<4<2<7<7<6 12-06-89<130 320~40<5<10<3<5<9<6<6<4<4<4<4<7<6<7 (A)These tabulated LLD values for Zr/Nb-95 are the higher of the individual parent or daughter LLDs.(B)These tabulated LLD values are for Ba-140, either based on direct measurement of Ba-140 or based on ingrowth of La-140, whichever method yields the greater sensitivity for a given sample.

4.a.2~~FISH-Mixed S ecies-(Ci/k wet weight)Sample Collection Site Date K-40 Mn-54 Fe-59 (:o-58 r.'o-bO Zn-65 H15 10-04-89 4180+240<13<44<15<17<40 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ra-226 Ra-228<20<22<36<68 4.B.I BROADLEAF VEGETATION

-Mao rove-(Ci/R wet weI ht)Sample Collection Site Date Be-'7 K-40 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 H51 10-04"89 300 4 50 2500+140 11-08-89 400 R 40 1990 4 110 12-06-89 300 50 2060 120<10<7<9<9<12<10<8<9 H52 10-04-89 400+50 4400 i 170<9<9<10 11-08-89 550+50 3180+130 12-06-89 310 R 40 4090+170<9<8<9<12<8<10 H59 10-04-89 420 4 50 3840+150 11-08-89 370+30 2770 R 120 12-06-89 340+40 2650 4.140<12<8<8<9<7<10<10<10<10 h

1989 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT ST.LUCIE PLANT-UNITS NOS.1 AND 2 ATTACHMENT C RESULTS FROM THE INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1989 i

PLORIDA DEPT OP HRS-EPA IHTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECR PROGRAM DATA January through June, 1989 FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER MILK MILK MILK MILK WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha Beta Cs-137 Sr-90 Cs-137 K Sr-89 Sr-90 Alpha Alpha Beta Beta Cr-51 Co-60 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-65 RQ-106 Ru-106 Ba-133 Cs-134 Cs-134 Cs-137 Cs-137 H-3 H-3 I-131 Sr-89 Sr-89 Sr-90 Sr-90 Mon 03 03 03 03 04 04 04 04 01 05 01 05 02 02 06 02 06 02 06 06 02 06 02 06 02 06 02 01 Day 31 31 31 31 28 28 28 28 20 12 20 12 10 10 09 10 09 10 09 09 10 09 10 09 24 23 17 06 05 05 01 06 05 05 Yr 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 89 Known 21 62 20 20 50 1600 39 55 8 30 4 50 235 10 31 159 165 178 128 49 10 39 10 20 2754 4503 106 40 6 25 6 pCi/F pCi/F pCi/F pCi/F pCi/L mg/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pci/L pCi/L pci/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L Range Analyses 0.118 0.237 0.118 0.790 0.237 0.074 0.000 0'95 0.000 0.222 0.118 0.711 0.025 0.118 0.237 0.111 0.070 0.165 0.775 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.118 0.000 0.000 0.039 0.162 0.474 0.237 0.395 0.395 23.67 59.00 22.33 17.00 50.00 1613.33 33.00 48.00 7.00 26.67 5.33 49.67 236.33 10.67 31.67 167.33 176.00 173.00 127.00 48.00 10.00 38.00 10.33 21.00 2960.00 4736.67 106.00 35.00 5.00 22.67 4.67 0.92-1.04 0.81-3.46 0.00 0.29-2.08-4.04-0.35-0.72 0.46-0.12 0.10 0.23 0.23 0.90 1.12-0.48-0.13-0.35 0.00-0.35 0.12 0.35 1.00 0.90 0.00 1~7 3<<0.35-2.69-1.54 Media Nuclide Collection EPA Units Normal.Mean of N.D.K.Action Level Ky r NOTES: Normal.: Range N.D.K.: Normalized range.As defined in"Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981-1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, P.O.Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

NDP: No data provided.No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.~NA: Not available.

Report containing this data has not yet been received from EPA, Las Vegas.ACTION LEVEL:(~)Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of stron-tium carrier.Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.Cause: Erroneously over estimated chemical recovery of stron-tium carrier.Corrective action: Try to improve purity of isolated strontium carrier.

FLORIDA DEPT OF HRS-EPA INTERLABORATORY CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM DATA July through December, 1989 FILTER FILTER FILTER FILTER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER WATER Alpha Beta Cs-137 I-131 Alpha Beta Co-60 Zn-65 Ru-106 Ba-133 Cs-134 Cs-137 H-3 I-131 Media Nuclide Collection Mon Day Yr 08 25 89 08 25 89 08 25 89 08 25 89 09 22 89 09 22 89 10 06 89 10 06 89 10 06 89 10 06 89 10 06 89 10 06 89 10 20 89 08 04 89 EPA Known 6 10 4 6 30 129 161 59 29 59 3496 83 Units pCi/F pCi/F pCi/F pCi/F pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pci/I, pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L pCi/L 0.118 10.67 0.118 0.000 F 118 0.273 0.370 0.197 0.237 0'37 0.212 0.222 4.67 12.00 32.33 132.67 163.00 58.00 28.67 63.33 3563.33 83.67 Normal.Mean of Range Analyses 0.118 6.33 N.D.K.Action Level 0.12 NA 0~23 NA 0.23 2.08 0.81 0.49 0.22-0.29-0.12 1.50 0.32 0.14 NOTES: Normal.: Range N.D.K.: NDP: NA: Normalized range.As defined in"Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies Program Fiscal Year 1981-1982", Environmental Monitoring Systems Laboratory, U.S.Environmental Protection Agency, P.O.Box 93478, Las Vegas, Nevada, 89193-3478.

EPA-600/4-81-004, February, 1981.Normalized deviation of the mean from the known value, as defined in EPA-600/4-81-004.

No data provided.No data was provided to EPA for inclusion in their report.Not available.

Due to problems in preparing cross-check sample.Please see attachments.

/~'MSL-LV AIR FILTER INTERCOMPARISON STUDY August 25, 1989 Beta Due to problems with the Iodine-131 in the Air Filter Intercomparison Study of August 25, 1989, the Beta results are invalid.Study: 8908 AF Isotope: Beta Collection Date: Au ust 25 1989 Supervisory Check Date V VAugust 25, 1989 Iodine-131 EMSL"LV AIR FILTER INTERCOMPARISON STUDY Due to problems with the Iodine-131 in the Air Filter Intercomparison Study of August 25, 1989, the Iodine-131 results are invalid.Study: 8908 AF Isotope: Iodine-131 Collection Date: Au ust 25 1989Supervisory Check Date

)t e.4/la't t , IIC