|
|---|
Category:Rulemaking-Comment
MONTHYEARNRC-2018-0017, Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel2018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (063) of Patricia Gracian on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2792018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (062) from Jonathan Adler on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2772018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (060) from Marion Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2762018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (070) from Daniel Dowden on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18158A2702018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (064) from Mary Jo Poole on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3792018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (053) from Doris Pfalmer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3782018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (052) from Carmela Price on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3742018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (057) from Arturo Torres on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3732018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (056) from Irwin Sprin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3722018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (055) from Paula Colby on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3712018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (054) from Joel Goldstein on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3622018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (049) from Scott Chamberlin on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3572018-06-0505 June 2018
Comment (044) from Sheryl Arruda on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3682018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (042) of Jo Panitch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3672018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (041) of Anne Clorite on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3662018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (040) from Susan and David Dearing on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3652018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (039) of Berton Moldow on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3642018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (038) of Laura Lynch on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3562018-06-0404 June 2018
Comment (043) of Mary Steele on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A2992018-06-0101 June 2018
Comment (034) from an Anonymous Individual on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18157A3002018-05-31031 May 2018
Comment (033) from Patricia Borchmann on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18150A6392018-05-29029 May 2018
Comment (029) from Donna Shanske on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18149A6012018-05-25025 May 2018
Comment (019) from Cord Bauer on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18094A7852018-04-0303 April 2018
Comment (003) from Ken Berg on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18100A3522018-04-0202 April 2018
Comment (012) of Steve Schlesinger on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML18094A7732018-04-0202 April 2018
Comment (002) from Ron Rodarte on the Requirements for the Indefinite Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML16082A0072016-03-18018 March 2016
Comment (112) of Charles R. Langley on Behalf of Public Watchdogs on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16060A5112016-02-29029 February 2016
Comment (043) of Sara Kaminske on Behalf of Orange County, CA on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML16053A4532016-02-0101 February 2016
Comment (036) of Ron Roberts and Dianne Jacob on Behalf of the County of San Diego, CA, Board of Supervisors on ANPR-26, 50, 52, 73, and 140 - Regulatory Improvements for Decommissioning Power Reactors
ML14007A0332013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00868) of Patricia Holloway on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A4422013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00845) of G. Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A4382013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00841) of Bruce Lieberman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14006A3782013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00835) of Yoko Collin on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0572013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00786) of Alan Korsen on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0052013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00736) of Valerie Burchfield Rhodes on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13365A3372013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00717) of Laurenn Barker on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13360A3582013-12-20020 December 2013
Comment (00685) of Ray Lutz on Behalf of Citizens Oversight, Inc. on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13359A0022013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00648) of Grace Van Thillo on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14002A0042013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00801) of Jim Powers on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14002A0002013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00797) of Kevin Carey on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0372013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00766) of Ed Maher on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0362013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00765) of Juniel Worthington on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML14001A0252013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00754) of Margaret Kuchnia on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A4262013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00639) of Kim Stanick on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A4252013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00647) of Stephanie Jennings on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A4162013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00632) of Christina Imhoof on PR-51, Waste Confidence Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13358A3512013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00615) of John Dolegowski on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13357A8322013-12-19019 December 2013
Comment (00601) of Roger Johnson on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13352A5172013-12-15015 December 2013
Comment (00461) of Kevin Higgins on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
ML13336A5512013-11-18018 November 2013
Comment (00269) of Bill Hannaman on PR-51, Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel
2018-06-05
[Table view] |
Text
1 Rulemaking1CEm Resource From: RulemakingComments Resource Sent: Tuesday, December 24, 2013 11:00 AM To: Rulemaking1CEm Resource Cc: RulemakingComments Resource
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Attachments:
1112 thillo.pdf DOCKETED BY USNRC-OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY SECY-067 PR#: PR-51 FRN#: 78FR56775 NRC DOCKET#: NRC-2012-0246 SECY DOCKET DATE: 12/19/13 TITLE: Waste Confidence-Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel COMMENT#: 00648
Hearing Identifier: Secy_RuleMaking_comments_Public Email Number: 673 Mail Envelope Properties (377CB97DD54F0F4FAAC7E9FD88BCA6D0014433C4A018)
Subject:
PR-51 Waste Confidence Sent Date: 12/24/2013 11:00:21 AM Received Date: 12/24/2013 11:00:20 AM From: RulemakingComments Resource Created By: RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov Recipients: "RulemakingComments Resource" <RulemakingComments.Resource@nrc.gov>
Tracking Status: None "Rulemaking1CEm Resource" <Rulemaking1CEm.Resource@nrc.gov> Tracking Status: None Post Office: HQCLSTR01.nrc.gov
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 254 12/24/2013 11:00:20 AM 1112 thillo.pdf 83740 Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: Recipients Received:
Docket: NRC-2012-0246 Consideration of Environmental Impacts on Temporary Storage of Spent Fuel After Cessation of Reactor Operation Comment On:
NRC-2012-0246-0456 Waste Confidence - Continued Storage of Spent Nuclear Fuel; Extension of Comment Period Document:
NRC-2012-0246-DRAFT-1112 Comment on FR Doc # 2013-26726 Submitter Information Name: Grace van Thillo Address: San Clemente, CA, 92672 Email: gracea@earthlink.net General Comment We are grateful that the City Council of San Clemente with its 60,000+ residents; and encouraging nearby Emergency Zone cities, did Approve and Pass their Resolution No. 13-53 requesting that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission; D.O.E. and responsible agencies prioritize San Onofre nuclear plants radioactive waste storage and removal, when safe to do so.
The Generic Environmental Impact Statement is inappropriate and should be rejected across the nation; as each nuclear reactor has specific geographic, geologic and population realities. San Onofres unique realities - its sensitive earthquake/tsunami zones; dense surrounding populations; major transportation corridors; and the Department of Navys essential installation of USMC, Camp Pendleton, make such a "generic' statement impossible!
Plus, with our emerging understanding of high burn-up fuel WASTE with its long-term onsite storage and transporting challenges; and "the Department of Energy reports that burnups "as low as 30 GWd/MTU can present performance issues including cladding embrittlement under accident conditions as well as normal
operations," DEMAND specific research and solutions. http://sanonofresafety.org/nuclear-waste/ and http://sti.srs.gov/fulltext/SRNL-STI-2011-00228.pdf NRC Chairman, Allison Macfarlane, recently expressed in an interview - "I encourage countries embarking on nuclear power to make sure that they have a plan for disposal, before they turn on a reactor!"
PUBLIC SUBMISSION As of: December 20, 2013 Received:
December 19, 2013 Status: Pending_Post Tracking No.
1jx-89dt-wn62 Comments Due:
December 20, 2013 Submission Type:
Web Pa ge 1of 2 12/20/2013 htt ps://www.fdms.
g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814cba2c&am
...
So eve r-mindful of ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE, the D.O.E. or our state MUST locate a suitable remote repository for this waste when its SAFE to transport away from San Onofre. Likewise, to carry out San Clemente's SAFETY MANDATE, with the decommissioning plant in its front yard, the City MUST be financially supported, along with independent expert assistance to be included in the decommissioning process.
Through the years, so-called utility and industry experts talked about safety BUT it has been many informed citizens, the on-going horror of Fukushima, the NRC, the CPUC, GAO & Congressional Investigations, which ALL exposed San Onofres realities - TODAY THE NUCLEAR PLANT IS CLOSED, and we the people are LEFT with the radioactive WASTE!
Pa ge 2of 2 12/20/2013 htt ps://www.fdms.
g ov/fdms-web-a g enc y/com p onent/contentstreamer?ob j ectId=09000064814cba2c&am
...
