ML14071A069

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:33, 2 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562
ML14071A069
Person / Time
Site: Farley Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 02/20/2014
From:
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A069 (39)
v • d • e


Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIN23POOIB Equip. ClassEquipment Description AUX FODWA TER PUMP 1BSheet 1 of.2 5Status: Y[E'ND] U[Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, Area 16z.Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructlons for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anehoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the itein one Y@1'NDof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y[(NN3 UD N/AOY4 NEI ur N/ADYC/ NDI UD N/ADYE NO UO N/AOY6 uNU3 Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 234 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0FT 40Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 ofX !Statm: YGý NO UE[]Equipment ID No. QIN23POOIB Equip. Class,Equipment Description AUX FEEDWA TER PUMP 1BInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YE4NC UEJ N/ACY[f"NO UW N/ADYEYND UE] N/ADYZA'TD UEJOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YLP oD UIDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by- Y1VA0$ T/MDate: 4Z-PAOL A419ZLJ12;1'(% Z'/Page 235 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 236 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0AIPage 237 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0,VPage 238 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS fi- 1NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 oft 5'J4d4)Status: Y[A'] UE-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIPI1LT0516 Equip. Class, 18Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER Location:

Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area C -Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings, Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YOEIý2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNO U" N/AD)0<0l UE N/ADY ND UD N/AllY* N] UNI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B; Classes of Equipment.

Page 239 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet Y f uw)Status: Yj7NE] U[]F 1-4Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentIDNo.

OtPlILT0516 Equip. Class' 18Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL TRANSMITTER Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

U- N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YVNIO U-1 N/ACand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached fines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?P1UO N/ADTki46LuoOther Adverse Condtions 11, Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could W U0adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: 4cI Vtok QAptLOt~

ADate:I.-ý

-'0/>6/'Page 240 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0I -* ! --.................

11 ....................

Page 241 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0U'Page 242 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.071/tPage 243 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of ,Status: Yw [-] U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIPTO01 Equip.Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGETANKLocation:

Bldg. YARD FloorEl.

155 Roo:Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y NOof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

ýý.g "bI7/38q

lek., 6.oA.yj B-617/i007

-,Wz ee. Piz2. Is the anchorage flee of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?U- N/AD3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Yj1 ND UD N/ADoxidation?

4. Is'p7.G-r o "r/ O UO f/A/..4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? UD- N/AD5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

pp,,, .ýb /-7/ z 6 3reV., , a.,A 1,-7/oo7.4.42 Ver..zo6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNO UD N/ADYONOUnEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 244 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 of )Status: U[]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OllITO01 Equip. Class'Equipment Description CONDENSATE STORAGE TAN,Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y[N14 UD N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling files and lighting, YtNrl UD N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YZNE=] UDI N/ADYtý/N UDOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YfANID UDIadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: *^,I Date: 9o //2OZ.~-// -2NLPage 245 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 246 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS A.Page 247 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIP15HV3100 Equip. Class,Pouinment Desrintinn RHR HXiSAMPLE VALVESheet 1 of 3Status: Y@"NE] U]Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 77 Room, Area / 8Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

Yf ND U0 N/ADYVND UO" N/AD4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

Y UD N/AD5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YD ND UD N/A&'te 'NOUDI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 248 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sthaeet of 3Status: U[-]Equipment ID No. QIP15HV310A

&'. Equip. Class'Equipment Description RHR HXA SAMPLE VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?U' N/ACY'4NrJ U" N/AClYtN2I" UM N/A[UEJOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could U[0adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

YIl1, 0 v 3 it 5,4 I- (/-IfAjýI"

-t ý yEvaluated by
-., -Date: 19. /0, ZOF?IPage 249 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0'3IIPage 250 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.01 1 1111 111 11 , I IN IFl-'Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIOJI.F50.A

-Equip.Equipment Description SW STRAINER IASheet 1 of 4Status: Y[1 N1UOLocation:

Bldg. $WIA Floor El, l7 Room, Area : f12,AManmfacftr, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Insttmetions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Aichorane

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y$ Noof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YK TM "110/61-1.

2. Is the anchorage fre of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage fre of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete ner the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentaion?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of dhe 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration vafication is required.)

t24- 6U9 .A-Iiacýt VC r. z2-06. Based on the above anchmrage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YINEJ U0 N/AU.NIJ UD N/ADYK UUIi EDWe the equipmment ca name from Appendi B: Classe of Equpmeat.

Page 251 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1PfIFWOIA

-,Equ. ClaswSheet 2 04 64Sfttus: YO) NO U!]TEquipmeant Deacaiption, SW STINNE&i1

7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or stncturcs?

Yr$ NO 110 N/AIJ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, cefling tiles and lighting.

NEI ur N/AC)and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?A~ NO 110 N/AO7-N -1Other Advm-se Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could A[fiND UO affect the safety li~mcdions of the equipment?

C=mmts (Additional pages may be added as necessary) tt-w-iolt cormsion

,Evaluaxted by:rý &I IAAa177wtY~aco*

LoamroModa/

t1/4fizDate: _q/'i/r.L2 Page 252 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 253 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 254 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIPI6FV3009A Equip. Class,Sheet i of:# I?Status: YdNON" U[]Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SERVICE WATER DISCHARGE Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 100 Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

YO -YO] NEI UE] N/A1I IQ -I- I of CZ tpcoN e-.33. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YO] NO] UO]N/cNIAIV4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YE] NEI UO5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE] NE UE] N/Ab"e'N] UOE]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 255 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Ss t(Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 Of a+Status: Y[]'N[N]

Ut-Equipment ID No. Q1PI6FV3009A Equip. Class1 7Equipment Description CCW HEAT EXCHANGER SERVICE WA TER DISCHARGE Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YfKq lVO N/AE]rYeD U0 N/ADY UD N IAU0Yt~$Io U0Other Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could INC UEJadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/111014LhS(~~~ ~ ( Po i~16~f(t/~/N

-,614 dXVsEvaluated by:Date: , 21. ,2.4-2/Z1~/

Page 256 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 257 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS PileF V3rm 14pl (v(0NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0ýrI elfforPage 258 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0rf -&-ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 of 3Status: Yl NR- UI"JEquipment ID No. QIP16G517B Equip. ClassL 20Equipment Description TURB BLDG SW ISO VALVE RELAY BOXLocation:

Bldg. DIESEL Floor El. 155 Room, Area 0O03'5(;.

Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Yf Noof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
12. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

Yq NO U- N/ACYý. NO U[] N/A[4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YQA NIO UC N/AO5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Ylq NC UC N/ACY4 N UCIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 259 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Fl-,0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3Status: Yo Nn U]Equipment ID No. Q1P16G517B Equip. Class' 20Equipment Description TURB BLDG SW ISO VALVE RELA Y BOXInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YNO UD N/AU8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y NO UO N/AOand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

149. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y NC] UO N/AOYERNO U0Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YI" NEI UO]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

P-Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: ~~I ~h)&CJLu

~4 ?l6~z. Q..A4 TA MK{Lý"Date: _/ _,/ ,,', oI -z.OlI I/ / 7IIPage 260 of 562 A T T C H A E N 3 : s S S A 4 C A L K D O V W V C H E C K L IS T SNo. SNCF164_RPT.,

VRFSION 2.04Page 261 Of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)She1 of4 qStatus: U[-]Equipment ID No. QIPlOMOV3149 Equip. Classý 8Equipment Description BLOWDOWN HX ISOLATION MOVLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 2:ýoManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO- NEof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?
3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

YO NO UC N/A.EYO NO UF N/A['4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?

YF'] NO U[L N/A[Yknr' Q~~-NYO05. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

YO NO UQ NIAY1Y11 NO UOPage 262 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 ofjqStatus: Y/ NEI UE]Equipment ID No. QIP16MOV3149 Equip. Class,Equipment Description BLOWDOWN HX ISOLATION N1Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YEA NO U[ N/AOYrj NO UC N/ACYIA NO UC N/ACYi NO UCOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y9/"N UCadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: -Q Date: 913I7 jtV/fPage 263 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 264 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Ff..,PNO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0it ,-, 1-1Page 265 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0nI- ý1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIPf6POO1C Equip. Class,Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP 1 CSheet I of 3Status: Y$] NC UE]Location:

Bldg. SWIS Floor El. 188 Room, Area 72.. AManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorate I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

Yg ND2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YJ NO UEJ N/ADNO UD N/ADY'(N[ UD N/AD¥/6N[0 UD N/ADN[3 uNJI Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 266 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Ps 0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 of 3Status: Yo Nn U[]Equipment ED No. QIP16POOIC Equip. Class' 6Equipment Description SERVICE WATER PUMP ICInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution
systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y4.,,,NE U0 N/AEIYj:ifm U- N/AflYý NE UFC N/AEIYI NEI UEOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y NEI UE]adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

  • JfwtAiTj, O Ia t iuvin KA/2-la'L. j.A, U~UfDate: .43 )& 12.1ý\jý,f \j ,Page 267 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTSf,,,QNO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0DPage 268 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0SI-7DFl- 70Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet i of/Y4Status: YP N[] Ut]Equipment U) No. Q1P16V514 Equip. Class' 8Equipment Description SERVICE WA TER TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLA TION VALVELocation:

Bldg. YARD Floor El. 155 Room, Area ,'49 AManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YE) NJof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

I2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?
4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YE) NE) UE) N/AlpYE NE) UE) N/A.YE) NEI UE) N/Ar9YE NE) UE) N/A[ýY? NEI U-IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 269 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Waikdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 2 Of 14Status: Y N] No -]Equipment ED No. QIP16V514 Equip. Class, 8Equipment Description SERVICE WATER TO TURBINE BLDG ISOLATION VALVEInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Ylp NrJ UMJ N/AOJ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI NOl UO N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?'iiP NO UQ N/AflV NO UOOther Adverse Conditions
11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could "V3 NE UQ"adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Evaluated by: Law-n Date: '____oC_

__z, A,"9Mt/ ,-Date:Page 270 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0\IPage 271 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I t- "7oNO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0f 1- 70-Page 272 of 562

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML14071A069&oldid=793853"