ML20195F891

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:22, 16 December 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comment Opposing Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Emergency Planning & Preparedness Requirements for Nuclear Power Plant Fuel Loading & Initial Low Power Operations
ML20195F891
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 06/06/1988
From: Jorgenson L, Jorgenson R
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To: Chilk S
NRC OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY (SECY)
References
FRN-53FR16435, RULE-PR-50 53FR16435-00739, 53FR16435-739, NUDOCS 8806270173
Download: ML20195F891 (1)


Text

p _ . , . . . . .

. . 4 . w.g .. . ._ . g , -_. 2. _ _ m , . , , . - i ,.

( T y p -- - -'

E :n  ::. .r r" _.

. 000KET NUMBER m gJ "; f  ;

r r..JPOSED RULE D' ggEE(63ff/y3p]

. . 'N .AN 16 P4 38 June 6, 1988 Samuel J. Chilk gICEGFStuttiAe' Secretary of the Commission KEigjEAg.ent ion: Docketing U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission and Service Branch

  • 1717 H Street, N.W.

d Washington, D.C. 20555 i

r

Dear Sir:

[ On May 9, 1988, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) published

! a proposed change to its emergency planning requirements for fuel

! loading and low-power operation of nuclear power plants.

i I The proposed rule change would eliminate many existing low power

licensing requirements, including offsite emergency response j'

plans, any public-notification systems (including sirens), and

~

the training of offsite emergency response personnel.

As a resident of the Seabrook nuclear plant area, I vigorously oppose the propossd amendment to existing safety requirements.

, The proposed rule has been developed with only the utility's

. interests in mind. The NRC is once again moving to place the public at risk for the sole purpose of allowing Seabrook Station to obtain a low-power license, even though the question of

, whether it will ever be granted a full-power license is seriously

< in doubt.

i In the interest of public safety, I urge the Commission to reject the proposed rule change. All offsite emergency response

} planning requirements must be in place before allowing any degree of risk to the public, including risks from low power operation.

Sincerely,

{

. W P .t,

,j.vf'T. {.{' Aj O'..{' ' ','T.r',

l .. , t'/ ^ ' ; fl,f .

' 1: .

-:b Name and Address b

i,ga.ny i RAymono JoueW50g i jeg i Box 270 --

' ' "' l OssgeE , NH osu+ *-

.M.i

' ' A

, .. ...e

. m . . .. 2 , - .

8806270173 800606 PDR PR Y(

50 53FR16435 PDR , ,

p s_.  ; s1: } jQ

_