Text

Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.
	ML17289B193
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia
Issue date:	01/31/1993
From:	; WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:	;
Shared Package
ML17289B191	List: ML17289B190; ML17289B192; ML17289B193;
References
	PROC-930131, NUDOCS 9303090414
	Download: ML17289B193 (246)
	v • d • e

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM r WNP-2 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL

+>Ogoqo4gg 930301 05000397 PDR ADQCK PDR

AMENDMENT NO. 12 JANUARY 1993 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Pa e Amendment Pa e Amendment 22 23 24 lV 25 26 V1 27 V11 12 28 1 29 2 30 9 3 9 31 ll 4 ll 32 9 5 9 33 9 6 11 34 ll 7 34a ll 8 35 9 9 36 9 10 37 9 ll 9 38 9 12 39 9 13 40 9 14 41 9 15 42 9 16 43 9 17 44 9 18 45 9 19 46 9 20 47 9 21 48 9 LEP-1

AMENDMENT NO. 12 JANUARY 1993 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Pa e Amendment Pa e Amendment 49 77 50 9 78 51 ll 79 52 ll 80 53 9 81 54 ll 82 9 55 ll 83 9 56 ll 84 9

'7 ll 85 ll 58 ll 86 9 59 ll 87 60 ll 88 9 61 ll 89 9 62 9 90 9 63 9 91 64 9 92 65 9 93 66 9 94 67 95 68 96 9 69 9 97 10 70 9 98 9 71 9 99 9 72 9 100 12 73 ll 100a 12 74 9 101 12 75 9 102 ll 76 9 103 9 LEP-2

AMENDMENT NO. 12 JANUARY 1993 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL LIST OF EFFECTIVE PAGES Pa e Amendment Pa e Amendment 104 10 131 105 10 132 106 12 133 107 12 134 9 108 12 135 9 109 12 136 ll 110 12 137 9 110a 12 138 10 ill 139 112 140 113 141 114 142 9 115 9 143 11 116 10 144 117 10 145 118 146 119 10 147 120 10 148 121 149 122 150 123 151 124 152 10 125 153 126 154 127 10 155 128 156 129 9 157 9 130 10 158 10 LEP-3

4 4 V

AMENDMENT NO. 12 JANUARY 1993 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL LIST OF FFECTIVE PAGES Pa e Amendment Pa e Amendment 159 9 169 9 160 170 9 161 171 9 162 172 10 163 173 9 164 174 9 165 175 9 166 176 9 167 177 9 168 LEP-4

P AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title ~Pe e

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 LIQUID EFFLUENT DOSE CALCULATION ................. 1 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Radwaste Liquid Effluent Radiation Monitoring System ....... 2 2.3 10 CFR 20 Release Rate Limits................... 2 2.3.1 Pre-Release Calculation . 3 2.3.2 Post-Release Calculation 4 2.3.3 Continuous Release 5 2.4 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, Release Rate Limits 5 2.4.1 Projection of Doses . 8 2.5 Radwaste Liquid Effluent Dilution Ratio Alarm Setpoints Calculations 9 2.5.1 Introduction 9 2.5.2 Methodology for Determining the Maximum Permissible Concentrati on (MPC) Fraction ~,9 2.5.3 Methodology 0

for the Determination of Liquid Effluent Monitor S etposnt 10 2e6 Verification of Compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, and 10 CFR 20, Appendix 8 . 12 2.7 Methods for Calculating Dose to Man from Liquid Effluent Pathways 13 2.7.1 Radiation Doses . 13 2.7.2 Plant Parameters 17

II AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Ti tl e ~Pe e 2.8 Compliance With Technical Specification 3. 11. 1.4 . . . . . . . . . 18 2.8.1 Haximum Allowable Liquid Radwaste Activity in Temporary Radwaste Hold-Up Tanks . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.8.2 Maximum Allowable Liquid Radwaste in Tanks That Are Not Surrounded by Liners, Dikes or Walls . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 2.9 Liquid Process Monitors and Alarm Setpoints Calculations . . . . . 22 2.9. 1 Standby Service Water (SW) Monitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . , , 23 2.9.2 Turbine Building Service Water (TSW) Monitor . . . . . . . . . . . 23 2.9.3 Turbine Building Sumps Water (FD) Monitor . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 3.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE CALCULATION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 3.1 Introduction 34 3.2 Gaseous Effluent Radiation Monitoring System 35 3.2.1 Hain Plant Release Point 35 3.2.2 Radwaste Building Ventilation Exhaust Monitor . 36 3.2.3 Turbine Building Ventilation Exhaust Monitor 37 3.3 10 CFR 20 Release Rate 'Limits . 38 3.3.1 Noble Gases . . 38 3.3.2 Radioiodines and Particulates . 39 3.3.2.1 Dose Parameter for Radionuclide i (P~) 41 3.4 10 CFR 50 Rel'ease Rate Limits . 42 3.4.1 Noble Gases (Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.2 (3. 11.2.2) . . . . 43 3.4.2 Radioiodines, Tritium and Particulates Requirement for Operabi lity 6.2.2.3 (3.11.2.3) 46 3.4.2.1

~ ~ Dose Parameter for Radionuclide i (R;) 48

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pa<ac 3.4.3 Annual Dose at Special Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 3.5 Compliance with Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.4 (3. 11.2.4) . . 55 3.5.1 Projection of Doses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 56 3.6 Calculation of Gaseous Effluent Monitor Alarm Setpoints . . . . . .,56 3.6.1 Introduction 56 3.6.2 Setpoint Determination for All Gaseous Release Paths . . . . . . . 56 3.6.2.1 Setpoints Calculations Based on Whole Body Dose Limits . . . . . . 57 3.6.2.2 Setpoints Calculations Based on Skin Dose Limits . 60

....................

. . . . . . . .

4.0 COMPLIANCE WITH 40 CFR 190 92 4.1 Requirement for Operability . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ 92 4.2 ODCM Methodology for Determining Dose and Dose Commitment from Uranium Fuel Cycle Sources . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 92

................

. .

4.2.1 Total Dose from Liquid Effluents ~ 93 4.2.2 Total Dose from Gaseous Effluents................. 93 4.2.3 Direct Radiation Contribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 5.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING............... 93 5.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) . . . . . . . 94 5.2 Land Use Census . 95 5.3 Laboratory Intercomparison Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 96 5.4 Reporting Requirements 97 6.0 CONDUCT OF TESTS AND INSPECTIONS IN SUPPORT OF WNP-2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT AND RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS... 113 Monitoring Requirement for Operability .............

Instrumentation in Support of WNP-2 Radioactive Effluent 115 111

AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION HANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Ti tl e ~Pe e 6.2 Requirement for Operability in Support of the Radioactive Effluent Honitoring Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 128 6.3 Requirement for Operability in Support of the Radiological Environmental Honitoring Programs . . . . . . . . . ... . .'. . . 148 6.4 Radiological Environmental Operating/Radioactive Effluent Release Report Requirements and Control of Changes . . . . . . . 163 6.5 B ases . 168

II AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL LIST OF TABLES Section Title Pa<ac Section 2.0 2-1 Fish Bioaccumulation Factors (BF;) and Adult Ingestion Dose Conversion Factors (DF,) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 2-2 Ingestion Dose Factors (A;;) for Total Body and Critical Organ . . . 28 2-3 Input Parameters Used to Calculate Maximum Individual Dose From Liquid Effluents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Section 3.0 Dose Factors for Noble Gases and Daughters 62 3-2 Distances (Miles) to Typical Controlling Locations as Measured from Center of WNP-2 Containment Building . 63 3-3 WNP-2 Long-Term Average Dispersion (X/g) and Deposi tion (D/g)

Values for Typical Locations 64 Dose Rate Parameters. Implementation of 10 CFR 20, Airborne Releases 65 3-5a Dose Rate Parameters. Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Airborne Releases - Age Group: Adult 67 3-5b Dose Rate Parameters. Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Airborne Releases - Age Group: Teen . 68 3-5c Dose Rate Parameters. Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Airborne Releases - Age Group: Child 69 3-5d Dose Rate Parameters. Implementation of 10 CFR 50, Airborne Releases - Age Group: Infant . 70 3-6 Input Parameters for Calculating R; 71 Input Parameters for Calculating R, 72 Input Parameters for Calculating R"; 73

AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION HANUAL LIST OF TABLES Section Title ~Pe e 3-9 Input Parameters Needed for Calculating Dose to the Haximum Individual from WNP-2 Gaseous Effluent . . . . ; . . . . . . ~ . . 74 3-10 Reactor Building Stack X/Q and D/Q Values . ~ .. 76 3-11 Turbine Building or Radwaste Building X/Q and D/Q Values 80 3-13 Characteristics of WNP-2 Gaseous Effluent Release Points 84 3-14 References for Values Listed in Table 3-9 . 85 3-15 Design Base Percent Noble Gas (30-Hinute Decay) 86 3-16 Annual Doses at Typical Locations Source: WNP-2 Gaseous Effluent . . . . . . . . . 87 3-17 Annual Occupied Air Dose at Typical Locations . 88 Section 5.0 5-1 Radiological Environmental Honitoring Program Plan . . . . . . . . . . 100 5-2 WNP-2 REHP Locations 104 5-3 Environmental Radiological Honitoring Program Annual Summary 5-4 Reporting Levels for Nonroutine Operating Reports . . . . . . . . . , . 112 Section 6.0 6.1.1.1-1 (3.3.7.11-1) Radioactive Liquid Effluent Honitoring Instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 6.1.1.1.1-1 (4.3.7.11-1) Radioactive Liquid Effluent Honitoring Instrumentation Periodic Tests and Inspections 119 6.1.2.1-1 (3.3.7.12-1) Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Honitoring Instrumentation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 122

AMENDMENT NO. 12 JANUARY 1993 OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title ~Pa e 6.1.2.1.1-1 (4.3.7.12-1) Radioactive Gaseous Effluent Monitoring Instrumentation Periodic Tests and Inspections Requirements . . . . . . . . . . . 125 6.2.1.1.1-1 (4.11-1)

...............

Radioactive Liquid Waste Sampling and Analysis Program 130 6.2.2.1.2-1 (4.11-2) Radioactive Gaseous Waste Sampling and Analysis Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 136 6.3.1.1-1 (3.12-1) Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program . 151 6.2.1.1-2 (3.12-2) Reporting Levels for Radioactivity Concentrations in Environmental Samples . . . . 157 6.3.1.1.1-1 (4.12-1) Detection Capabilities for Environmental Sample Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 158 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE Ti tl e Pacae 2-1 Simplified Block Diagram of Liquid Waste System . 32 2-2 Simplified Block Diagram of Solid Radwaste System . 33 I.

3-1 Site Boundary for Radioactive Gaseous and Liquid Effluents 89 3-2 Simplified Block Diagram of Gaseous Waste System 90 3-3 Simplified Block Diagram of Off-Gas Treatment System 91 5-1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Sample Locations Inside of 10-Mile Radius 109 5-2 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Sample Locations Outside of 10-Mile Radius . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., . 110 5-3 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Sample Locations Near Plant 2 110a vii

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992

1. 0 INTRODUCTION The purpose of this manual is to provide the information and methodologies to be used by the Washington Public Power Supply System to satisfy the requirements of 10 CFR 20. 106, 40 CFR Part 190, 10 CFR 50.36a, and Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.

2.0 LI UID EFFLUENT DOSE CALCULATION The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's computer program LADTAP II can be used for dose analysis 'for liquid radioactive effluents from WNP-2 into surface waters. The analyses estimate radiation dose to individuals, population groups, and biota from ingestion (aquatic foods, water, and terrestrial irrigated foods) and external exposure (shoreline, swimming, and boating) pathways, The calculated doses provide for determining compliance with Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50.

2. 1 Introduction Liquid radwaste released from WNP-2 will meet 10 CFR 20 limits at the point of discharge to the Columbia River. This design objective will be kept at all times. Actual discharges of liquid radwaste effluents will only occur on a Batch Basis, and the average concentration at the point of discharge will be only a small percentage of the allowed limits. A simplified block diagram of the liquid waste management system and effluent pathways is contained in Figure 2-1. Solid radioactive wastes are disposed of by way of an approved disposal site. A simplified block diagram of the solid radwaste system is described in Figure 2-2.

The cumulative quarterly dose contributions due to radioactive liquid effluents released to the unrestricted areas will be determined once every 31 days using the LADTAP II computer code. The maximum exposed individual is assumed to be an adult whose exposure pathways include potable water and fish consumption. The choice of an adult as the maximum exposed individual is based on the highest fish and water consumption rates shown by that age group

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 and the fact that most of the dose from the liquid effluent comes from these two pathways.

The dose contributions will be calculated for all radionuclides identified in the released effluent. The calculations are based on guidelines provided by NUREG-0133 and the LADTAP II computer code.

The methods for calculating the doses are discussed in Section 2.4 of this manual.

2.2 Radwaste Li uid Effluent Radiation Monitorin S stem This monitoring subsystem measures the radioactivity in the liquid effluent prior to its entering the cooling tower blowdown line.

All radwaste effluent passes through a four-inch line which has an off-line sodium iodide radiation monitor. The radwaste effluent flow, variable from 0 to 190 gpm, combines with the 36-inch cooling water blowdown line, variable from 0 to 7500 gpm, (average, based on operating data is 808 gpm) and is discharged to the Columbia River with a total flow based on MPC; total, and cooling water flushing needs.

The radiation monitor has a minimum sensitivity of 10'Ci/cc of Cs-137, and the radiation indicator has a range of seven decades. The radiation monitor is located on the 437'evel of the Radwaste Building, 2.3 10 CFR 20 Release Rate Limits The requirements pertaining to discharge of radwaste liquid effluents to the unrestricted area are specified in Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1. 1 (3.11.1.1):

t'

~

AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 "The concentration of radioactive material released from the site to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than noble gases, and 2 x 10 " pCi/ml'otal activity concentration for all dissolved or entrained noble gases."

In order to comply with the requirements stated above, limits will be set to assure that blowdown line concentrations do not exceed 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 at any time.

2.3. 1 Pre-Release Calculation The activity of the radionuclide mixture will be determined in accordance with Supply System procedure PPH 12.5.3, Liquid Effluent Discharge Determination.

Liquid effluent discharge is determined and calculated according to PPH

12. 11. 1, Radiological Effluent Honitoring Gaseous -and Liquid. The effluent concentration is determined by the following equation:

Ci x fw Cono =

ft where:

Conc Concentration of radionuclide i in-the effluent at point of I

discharge - pCi/ml.

C; Concentration of radionuclide i in the batch to be released

- pCi/ml.

fw Discharge flow rate from sample tank to the blowdown line-variable from 0 to 190 gpm.

fb Blowdown flow rate - variable from 0 to 7500 gpm.

Total discharge flow rate - (ft = fb + fw)

The calculated concentration in the blowdown line must be less than the

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 fw Discharge flow rate from sample tank to the blowdown line

- variable from 0 to 190 gpm.

fb Blowdown flow rate - variable from 0 to 7500 gpm.

Total discharge (ft = fb + fw) flow rate - variable from 0 to 7690 gpm.

To assure compliance with 10 CFR 20, the following relationships must hold:

m (Conc /MPC ) - 1 (4) i~ 1 where the terms are as defined in Equation (2).

2.3.3 Continuous Release Continuous release of liquid radwaste effluent is not planned for WNP-2.

However, should it occur, the concentrations of various radionuclides in the unrestricted area would be calculated according to Equation (3) and Equa-tion (4). To show compliance with 10 CFR 20, the two equations must again hold.

2.4 10 CFR 50 A endix I Release Rate Limits Periodic Test and Inspection 6.2. 1.2. 1 (4. 11. 1.2) requires that the cumulative dose contributions be determined in accordance with the ODCM at least once per 31 days. Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1.2 (3. 11. 1.2) specifies that the dose to a member of the public from radioactive material in liquid effluents released to the unrestricted area shall be limited to:

Zl.5 mrem/Calendar quarter - Total Body and

<5.0 mrem/Calendar quarter - Any Organ.

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 concentrations listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B. Before releasing the batch to the environment, the following equation must hold:

(Conc/MPC.,) < 1 (2) i~1 where:

one.

I The concentration of radionuclide i in the effluent at the point of discharge into the river.

MPC; Maximum permissible concentration of nuclide i as listed in 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II.

Total number of radionuclides in the batch.

2.3.2 Post-Release Calculation The concentration of each radionuclide in the unrestricted area, following the batch release, will be calculated as follows:

The average activity of radionuclide i during the time period of the release i.s divided by the Plant Discharge Flow/Tank Discharge Flow ratio yielding the concentration at the point of discharge:

=

CRx fw Con, (3) ft where:

Con~ The concentration of radionuclide i in the effluent at the ik point of discharge during the release period k - (pCi/ml).

Cn The concentration of radionuclide i in the batch during the release period k - (pCi/ml).

A'l AHfNDMENT NO. ll AUGUST 1992 The cumulative dose for the calendar year shall be limited to:

~3 mrem - Total Hody and glO mrem - Any Organ.

The dose contribution will be calculated for all radionuclides identified in the liquid effluent released to the unrestricted area, using the following equation:

D7 = g(A g htzCiF i !~1 where:

The cumulative dose commitment to the total body or organ, r, from liquid effluents for the total time period g ht,,

li1 in mrem.

The length of the 2th time period over which C and F, are averaged for all liquid releases, in hours.

The number of releases for the time period under consideration.

C The average concentration of radionuclide i in undiluted liquid effluent during time period nt, from any liquid release, in pCi/ml.

A;, The site-related ingestion dose commitment factor to the total body or any organ 7 for each identified principle gamma and beta emitter listed in Table 2-2, in mrem/hr per pCi/ml.

Fc The near field average dilution factor for C;, during any

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 liquid waste release. Defined as the ratio of the maximum undiluted liquid waste flow during release to the product of the average flow from the site discharge structure to unrestricted receiving waters times 500.

Liquid Radioactive Waste Flow fw Discharge Structure Exit Flow x 500 ft x 500 The term A the ingestion dose factors for the total body and critical organs, are tabulated in Table 2-2. It embodies the dose factor, fish bioaccumulation factor, pathway usage factor, and the dilution factor for the plant diffuser pipe to the Richland potable water intake. The following equation was used to calculate the ingestion dose factors:

where: A,, = K, (UJD+ U~ BF)) DFi (7)

A;, The composite dose parameter for total body or critical organ of an adult for nuclide i (in mrem/hr per pCi/ml).

K, A conversion factor:

1. 14E+05 - (10'Ci/pCi) x (10'l/liter)/8760 hr/yr.

U 730 liter/yr - which is the annual water consumption by the maximum adult (Table E-4 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

BFi Bioaccumulation factor for radionuclide i in fish - (pCi/Kg per pci/liter) (Table A-1 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1 and NUREG/CR-4013).

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 DF1 Adult ingestion dose conversion factor for nuclide i - Total body or critical organ, 7, in (mrem/pCi) (Table E-11 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1 and NUREG/CR-4013).

D Dilution factor from near field area (within one-quarter mile of the release point) to the Richland potable water intake - 100.

UF Adult fish consumption, 21 kg/yr (Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

The values of BF; and DF, are listed in Table 2-1. Dilution assumptions, calculations, and LADTAP II input parameters are provided in Radiological Health Calculation Log 92-2.

The quarterly limits mentioned before represent one-half of the annual design objective of Section II.A of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I. If any of the limits (either that of the calendar quarter or calendar year) are exceeded, a special report pursuant to Section IV.A of 10 CFR 50, Appendix I, shall be filed with the NRC.

2.4.1 Pro'ection of Doses The projected doses due to releases of WNP-2 radwaste liquid effluents will be calculated for each batch, using Equation (5) or LADTAP II. If the sum of the accumulated dose to date for the month and the projected dose for the remainder of the month exceeds the Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1.3 (3. 11. 1.3) limits, then the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be used.

This is to ensure compliance with Requirement for Operability 6.2.1.3 (3. 11. 1.3). This Requirement for Operability states that the liquid radwaste treatment system shall be maintained and the appropriate subsystem shall be used if the radioactive materials in liquid waste, prior to their discharge, when the dose, due to liquid effluent release to unrestricted areas when averaged over the month would exceed 0.06 mrem to total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ.

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 2.5 Radwaste Li uid Effluent Dilution Ratio and Alarm Set pints Calculations 2.5. 1 Introduction The dilution alarm ratio and setpoints of the sample liquid effluent monitor are established to ensure that the limits of 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2, are not exceeded in the effluent at the discharge point (i.e.,

compliance with Requirement for Operability 6.2.1. I (3.11.1. 1), as discussed in section 2.3. 1 of this manual).

The trip/alarm setpoint for the liquid radwaste effluent monitor is calculated from the results of the radiochemical analysis of the waste solution. The setpoint will be set into the radwaste monitor just prior to the release of each batch of radioactive liquid.

2.5.2 Methodolo for Determinin the Maximum Permissible Concentration HPC Fraction Radwaste liquid effluents can only be discharged to the environment through the four-inch radwaste line. The maximum radwaste discharge flow rate is 190 gpm. Prior to discharge, the tank is isolated and recirculated for at least thirty minutes, and a representative sample is taken from the tank. An isotopic analysis of the batch will be made to determine the sum of the HPC fraction (MPC,) based on 10 CFR 20 limits, From the sample analysis and the HPC values in 10 CFR 20, the HPC, is determined using the following equation.

HPC, =g s- i MPC.,

where:

HPC, Total fraction of the Maximum Permissible Concentrations (HPCs) in the liquid effluent waste sample.

C; The concentration of each measured radionuclide i obse} ved by the radiochemical analysis of the liquid waste sample (pCi/ml).

dl p I

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 MPC( The limiting concentrations of the appropriate radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2.0E-04 pCi/ml total activity.

The total number of measured radionuclides in the liquid batch to be released.

If the HPC, is less than or equal to 0.8, the liquid batch may be released at any radwaste discharge or blowdown rate. If the HPC, exceeds 0.8, then a dilution factor (Fd) must be determined. The liquid effluent radiation monitor responds proportionally to radioactivity concentrations in the undiluted waste stream. Its setpoint must be determined for diluted releases.

2.5.3 Methodolo for the Determination of Li uid Effluent Monitor Set oint The measured radionuclide concentrations are used to calculate the dilution factor (Fd), which is the ratio of the total discharge flow rates (fw + fb) to the radwaste tank effluent flow rate (fw) that is required to assure that the limiting concentrations of Requirement for Operability 6.2.1. 1 (3. 11. 1.1) are met at the point of discharge.

The dilution factor (Fd) is determined according to:

m I

Fd = x Fs (9) s-i HPC.,

where:

Fd The dilution factor required for compliance with 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2.-

C; The concentration of each radionuclide i observed by radiochemical analysis of the liquid waste sample (pCi/ml).

10

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 HPC; The limiting concentration of the appropriate radionuclide i from 10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2.0E-04 pCi/ml total activity.

Fs The safety factor; a conservative factor used to compensate for statistical fluctuations and errors in measurements.

For example, a safety factor (Fs) of 1.5 corresponds to a fifty (50) percent (%) variation.

The total number of measured radionuclides i in the liquid batch to be released.

The dilution which is required to ensure compliance with Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1. 1 (3. 11. 1. I) concentration limits will be set such that discharge rates are:

fw+fb Fd < (10) fw and follows that:

fw < fb Fd-1 (10a) or fb > fw(Fd-1) (10b) where:

The dilution factor from Equation (9).

fw The discharge flow rate from the liquid radwaste tank to the blowdown line - variable from 0 to 190 gpm.

fb The cooling tower blowdown flow rate - variable from 0 to 7500 gpm.

The liquid effluent radiation monitor response is based on the results of the radiochemical analysis of the waste solution. Therefore the calculation for

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 the radiation monitor's alarm/trip setpoint is:

SP = C + BKg + K [C + Bkg]'"

where:

SP Radiation monitor setpoint (count rate)

(Cix E.) represents the count rate from the i~1 radionuclides in the liquid radwaste.

C; The concentration of each measured radionuclide i observed by radiochemical analysis of the liquid waste sample (pCi/ml).

Same as for Equation (9).

E,; The radwaste effluent monitor's response to radionuclide i (count rate per pCi/ml).

BKg Background count rate of the radwaste effluent monitor.

A constant to compensate for normal expected statistical variations in the liquid effluent radiation monitor count rate to reduce the chance of false alarms/trips; K=3.

2.6 Verification of Com liance with 10 CFR 50 A endix I and 10 CFR 20 A endix B Verification of compliance with 10 CFR 50,'ppendix I, and 10 CFR 20, Appen-dix B, limits will be achieved by following WNP-2 Plant Procedures for liquid discharge and the periodic application of the LADTAP II computer code.

12

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 2.7 Methods for Calculatin Doses to Man From Li uid Effluent Pathwa s Dose models presented in NRC Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1, as incorporated in the LADTAP II computer code, will be used for offsite dose calculation. The details of the computer code, and user instruction, are included in NUREG/CR-4013, "LADTAP II - Technical Reference and User Guide."

2.7. 1 Radiation Doses Radiation doses from potable water, aquatic food, shoreline deposit, and irrigated food pathways will be calculated by using the following equations:

a. Potable Water Rpj1 1 0 0(0pU.,H, exp(-A.,t,) (13)

b. Aquatic Foods R,. = 1100 "

U, Hp

. g,.B,,D,.,.exp(-A,.t) (14)

c. Shoreline Deposits R.,.

= 110,000 "'

UM,W g Q,.TD.. [exp (-A,.t,) (1 exp(-A,.t,)] (15) 13

I I

ll g

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992

d. Irrigated foods For all radionuclides except tritium:

r [1 exp(- A~t.] f,B,.[1 exp(-A,.t,) ]

RpjU a/'di I

exp(1~th)0pj YA~ Pki,

+

animal

.. (-A.,t) r[l exp(-A~t,) ]

U ap g F. D iA aipj gFd,.exp I Yvk~

f, B,.v [l-exp(-k,.t) ] (16) iAw~AW pg I For tritium:

Uveg animal n opj CvD epj U D spj A~(C v~F F + C Aw~Aw) (17) ap ap where:

B;p The equilibrium bioaccumulation factor for nuclide i in pathway p, expressed as the ratio of the concentration in biota (in pCi/kg) to the radionuclide concentration in water (in pCi/liter), in liters/kg.

B; The concentration factor for uptake of radionuclide i from soil by edible parts of crops, in pCi/kg (wet weight) per

.pCi/kg dry soil.

C;A The concentration of radionuclide i in water consumed by animals, in pCi/liter.

C;v The concentration of radionuclide i in vegetation, in pCi/kg.

,AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 The dose factor specific to a given age group a, radio-nuclide i, pathway p, and organ j, which can be used to calculate the radiation dose from an intake of a radio-nuclide, in mrem/pCi, or from exposure to a given concen-tration of a. radionuclide in sediment, expressed as a ratio of the dose rate (in mrem/hr) and the areal radionuclide concentration (in pCi/m ).

d; The deposition rate of nuclide i in pCi/m'er hour.

The flow rate of the liquid effluent, in ft'/sec.

The fraction of the year crops are irrigated, dimensionless.

FiA The stable element transfer coefficient that relates the daily intake rate by an animal to the concentration in an edible portion of animal product, in pCi/liter (milk) per pCi/day or pCi/kg (animal product) per pCi/day.

M The mixing ratio (reciprocal of the dilution factor) at the point of exposure (or the point of withdrawal of drinking water or point of harvest of aquatic food), dimensionless.

'he effective "surface density" for soil, i'n kg (dry soil)/m'Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1).

0A The consumption rate of contaminated water by an animal, in liters/day.

OF The consumption rate of contaminated feed or forage by an animal, in kg/day (wet weight).

The release rate of nuclide i in Ci/yr.

15

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 The fraction of deposited activity retained on crops, dimensionless (Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

Rspj The total annual dose to organ j of individuals of age group a from all of the nuclides i in pathway p, in mrem/yr.

tb The period of time for which sediment or soil is exposed to the contaminated water, in hours (Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

The time period that crops are exposed to contamination during the growing season, in hours (Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1) .

A holdup time that represents the time interval between harvest and consumption of the food, in hours (Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

The radioactive half life of nuclide i in days.

The average transit time required for nuclides to reach the point of exposure. For internal dose, t, is the total time elapsed between release of the nuclides and ingestion of food or water, in hours (Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

U,p A usage factor that specifies the exposure time or intake rate for an individual of age group a associated with pathway p, in hr/yr, l/yr, or kg/yr (Table E-5, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

The shoreline width factor, dimensionless (Table A-2, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

16

'4 AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Y The agricultural productivity (yield), in kg (wet weight)/m'Table E-15, Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

The effective removal rate constant for radionuclide i from crops, in hr', where A = A, + A, A; is the radioactive decay constant, and A is the removal rate constant for physical loss by weathering (Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1, Table 8-15).

The radioactive decay constant of nuclide i in hr' 1100 The factor to convert from (Ci/yr)/(ft /sec) to pCi/liter.

110,000 The factor to convert from (Ci/yr)/(ft /sec) to pCi/liter and to account for the proportionality constant used in the sediment radioactivity model.

These equations yield the dose rates to various organs of individuals from the exposure pathways mentioned above.

2.7.2 Plant Parameters WNP-2 is a river shoreline site with a variable effluent discharge flow rate 0 to 7500 gpm. The population center nearest WNP-2 is the city of Richland, where drinking water withdrawal takes place. The applicable dilution factor is 50,000, using average river flow. The time required for released liquids to reach Richland, approximately 12 miles downstream, is estimated at 4.0 hours0 days 0 hours 0 weeks 0 months . Richland is the "realistic case" location, and doses calculated for the Richland location are typically applicable to the population as a whole.

Individual and population doses based on Richland parameters are calculated for all exposure pathways.

Only the population downstream of the WNP-2 site is affected by the liquid effluents released. There is no significant commercial fish harvest in the 50-mile radius region around WNP-2. Sportfish harvest is estimated at 17

f t

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 14,000 kg/year.

For irrigated foods exposure pathways, it can be assumed that production within the 50-mile radius region around WNP-2 is sufficient to satisfy consumption requirements.

Other relevant parameters relating to the irrigated foods pathways are defined as follows:

A 1Yiid ~Bi P id

~Food T e (1 i ter/m'/mo) (kg/m') (Days)

Vegetation 150 5.0 70 Leafy Vegetation 200 1.5 70 Feed for Milk Cows 200 1.3 30 Feed for Beef Cattle 160 2.0 130 Source terms are measured based on sampled effluent.

Table 2-3 summarizes the LADTAP II input parameters. Documentation and/or calculations of these parameters are discussed in detail in RHI 2.3, and Radiological Health Calculation Log 92-2.

2.8 Com liance with Technical S ecification 3. 11. 1;4 2.8. 1 Maximum Allowable Li uid Radwaste Activit in Tem orar Radwaste Hold-U Tanks The use of temporary liquid radwaste hold-up tanks is planned for WNP-2.

Technical Specification 3. 11. 1.4 states the quantity of radioactive material contained in any outside temporary tanks shall be limited to the limits calculated in the ODCM such that a complete release of the tank contents would not result in a concentration at the nearest offsite potable water supply that would exceed the limits specified in 10 CFR Part 20 Appendix B, Table II.

18

8 AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Equation (18) will be used to calculate the curie limit for a temporary radwaste hold-up tank. The total tank concentration will be limited to less than or equal to ten (gl0) curies, excluding tritium and dissolved or entrained gases.

Surveillance requirement 4. 11. 1.4, states that the quantity of radioactive material in the hold-up tanks shall be determined to be within the limit by analyzing a representative sample of the tank's contents at least once per 7 days when radioactive materials are being added to the tank.

AT fi (18)

HPC,.e""

where:

Ag Total allowed activity in tank (curies).

A; Activity of radioisotope i (curies).

HPC; Haximum permissible concentration of radionuclide i (10 CFR 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2).

Decay constant (years ") radioisotope i.

Transit time of ground water from WNP-2 to WNP-1 well (WNP-2 FSAR Section 2.4) = 67 years.

A,.

Fraction of radioisotope fi =

gA,.

Index for all radioisotopes in tank except tritium and noble gases.

Dispersion constant based on hydrological parameters, (2.4E+05 Ci per pCi/cc.)

19

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 The total allowed activity (A,) is based on limiting WNP-1 well water to less than 1 MPC, of the entire liquid content of the tank spilled to ground and then migrated via ground water to the WNP-1 well. The WNP-1 well is the location of maximum concentration since it is the nearest source of ground water and conditions are such that no spill of liquid should reach surface water. The 70-85 foot depth of the water table and the low ambient moisture of the soil requires,a rather large volume of spillage for the liquid to even reach the water table in less than several hundred years. However, allowed tank activity (AT) is conservatively based on all liquid radwaste in the tank instantaneously reaching the water table.

The hydrological analysis performed for the WNP-2 FSAR (Section 2.4) deter-mined that the transit time through the ground water from WNP-2 to the WNP-1 well is 67 years for Strontium and 660 years for Cesium. These two radio-nuclides are representative of the radionuclides found in liquid radwaste.

Strontium is a moderate sorber and Cesium strongly sorbs to soil particles.

This calculation conservatively treats all radionuclides as moderate sorbers with a transit time of 67 years.

The concentration of each radionuclide in the well (CW;) is simply the con-centration in the tank (CT;) adjusted for radioactive decay during transit (e"') and divided by the minimum concentration reduction factor (CRF;).

Limiting well concentration to 1 MPC yields;

.CT.,

CW, e CRF .MPCi

"'PC,.

(19) fFtom Section 2.4 of WNP-2 FSAR)

(4 7r L)'" (a a a )'"

(20) 2V where:

L Migration distance - 1 mile.

V Volume of tank.

o'x t o'y t o'z Dispersion constants.

20

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Combining Equations (19) and (20) yields:

CT,.2V e

"'

= (21)

(O ~ L)>>'~ o o,)>>'PC.

Substituting A; for CT; V and reorganizing terms yields:

(4mL) 'aa a,)" A, HPC.e

'~'22)

Making the following substitutions A,. =f,.A~

(4 ~ L)3/2 (~ o )1/2 C. (23)

K=

2 o

x 10 'i/pCi = 2.4 x 10 Ci per p CC yi el ds:

f.I K= A HPC or 2.8.2 Maximum f,.

HPC,.e '"'24)

Allowable Li uid Radwaste in Tanks That Are Not Surrounded b Liners Dikes or Walls Although permanent outside liquid radwaste tanks which are not surrounded by liners, dikes, or walls are not planned for WNP-2, Equation (18) will be used should such tanks become necessary in the future.

21

P J

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 2.9 Li uid Process Monitors and Alarm Set pints Calculations As mentioned in Section 2.2 of this manual, all liquid radwaste effluent is discharged through a four-inch line that is monitored by an off-line sodium iodide radiation monitor. This monitor is located on the 437'evel of the Radwaste Building. All WNP-2 radwaste liquid effluent is discharged to the Columbia River through the 36-inch Cooling Water Blowdown line. In addition to the liquid effluent discharge monitor there are three liquid streams that are normally nonradioactive but have a finite possibility of having radioactive material injected into them. These liquid streams are:

~ Standby Service Water (SW)

~ Turbine Building Service Water (TSW)

~ Turbine Building Sump Water (FD)

To prevent any discharges of radioactive liquid from these streams, radiation monitoring systems have been installed to detect 'any increase above the normal background concentration of radioactive material.

Alarm/setpoints are established to prevent any release of radioactive material in concentrations greater than 10 CFR 20 limits. The maximum radiation detector setpoint calculation for the three systems is based on the MPC; concentration of Cs-137 which is 2.0E-05 pCi/ml. The following equation is used to calculate the maximum setpoint:

Setpoint max. = [(2.0E-05 pCi/ml) (CF)] (25)

(in cpm or cps) where:

2.0E-05 pCi/ml = MPC limit for Cs-137 CF = Monitor calibration factor - in cpm/ pCi/ml or cps/ pCi/ml 22

I '

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 2.9.

~ ~ 1 Standb Service Water SW Monitor The Standby Service Water Monitors (SW) are located on the 522'evel of the Reactor Building.

The meter is located in the main control room on panel P-604.

The flow rate through the monitor is variable, from zero (0) to two (2) gpm with a normal flow of 1.0-1.5 gpm.

To ensure 10 CFR 20 limits are never exceeded, the alarm setpoint shall be established at 80% or less of the maximum setpoint plus background.

If the setpoint is exceeded, an alarm will activate in the main control room.

The control room operator can then terminate the discharge and mitigate any uncontrolled release of radioactive material.

2.9.2

~ ~ Turbine Buildin Service Water TSW Monitor This monitor is located on the 441'evel of the Turbine Building. The readout meter and recorder is located in the main control panel BD-RAD-24.

The flow rate through that monitor is variable, from zero (0) to six (6) gpm with a normal flow of 3-4 gpm.

To ensure 10 CFR 20 limits are never exceeded, the alarm setpoint shall be established at 80% or less of the maximum setpoint plus background.

If the setpoint is exceeded, an alarm will activate in the main control room.

The control room operator can then terminate the discharge and mitigate any uncontrolled release of radioactive material.

23

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 2.9.3

~ ~ Tur bine Buil din Sum s Water FD Monitor There are three detectors to measure the activity of each of the three nonradioactive sumps. The monitors are located on the 441'evel of the Turbine Building. The readout meters and recorder are located in the Radwaste Control Room Panel BD-RAD-41.

The Turbine Building Sump Water Effluents are not released to the Columbia River. This effluent is discharged to the Storm Drain System which is an open pond by the WNP-2 Warehouse.

The hydrological analysis performed for the WNP-2 FSAR (Section 2.4) determined that the transmit time through the ground water from WNP-2 to the WNP-1 well is 67 years for strontium and 660 years for cesium.

In the event the setpoint is exceeded, the sump water will be automatically routed to the radioactive waste system.

To prevent the sum of the sump water discharged from the three pumps from exceeding 10 CFR 20 limits, the alarm/setpoint will be established at 80% or less of the maximum setpoint plus background.

I AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 2-1 (contd.)

Table 2-1 FISH BIOACCUMULATION FACTORS ADULT INGESTION DOSE CONVERSION FACTORS (BF;)"'ND DF

Dose Conversion Factor (DF;)

Fish Nuclide ~FF Bioaccumulation (pCi/kg per Total

~Bod Bone (mRem

~Th roid per pCi Ingested)

Liver GI Tract pCi/liter)

H-3 9.0E-01 6.0E-08 (3) 6.0E-OS 6.0E-OS 6.0E-OS Na-24 1.0E+02 1.7E-06 1.7E-06 1.7E-06 1.7E-06 1.7E-06 P-32 1.0E+05 7.5E-06 1.9E-04 (3) 1.2E-05 2.2E-05 Cr-51 2.0E+02 2.7E-09 (3) 1.6E-09 (3) 6.'7E-07 Mn-54 4.0E+02 8.7E-07 (3) (3) 4.6E-06 1.4E-05 Mn-56 4.0E+02 2.0E-OS (3) (3) 1.2E-07 3.7E-06 Fe-55 1.0E+02 4.4E-07 2.8E-06 (3) 1.9E-06 1.1E-06 fe-59 1.0E+02 3.9E-06 4.3E-06 (3) 1.0E-05 3.4E-.05 Co-58 5.0E+Ol 1.7E-06 (3) (3) 7.5E-07 1.5E-05 Co-60 5. OE+Ol 4.7E-06 (3) (3) 2.1E-06 4.0E-05 Ni-65 1.0E+02 3.1E-OS 5.3E-07 (3) 6.9E-08 1.7E-06 Cu-64 5.0E+01 3.9E-OS (3) (3) 8.3E-OS 7.1E-06 Zn-65 2.0E+03 7.0E-06 4.8E-06 (3) 1.5E-05 9.7E-06 Zn-69m 2.0E+03 3.7E-OS 1.7E-07 (3) 4.1E-07 2.5E-05 As-76 1.0E+02 4.8E-06 (3) (3) (3) 4.4E-05 Br-82 4.2E+02 2. 3E;.0,6 (3) (3) (3) 2.6E-06 Br-83 4.2E+02 4. OE-08 (3) (3) (3) 5.8E-OS Br-84 4.2E+02 5.2E-OS (3) (3) (3) 4. 1E-13 Rb-89 2.0E+03 2.8E-OS (3) (3) 4.0E-OS 2.3E-21 Sr-89 3.0E+01 S.SE-06 3.1E-04 (3) (3) 4.9E-05 Sr-90 3.0E+Ol 1.8E-04 8.7E-03 (3) (3) 2.2E-04 Sr-91 3.0E+01 2.3E-07 5.7E-06 (3) (3) 2.7E-05 Sr-92 3.0E+Ol 9.3E-OS 2.2E-06 (3) (3) 4.3E-05 Y-90 2.5E+Ol 2.6E-10 9.7E-09 (3) (3) 1.0E-04 Y-91m 2.5E+Ol 3.5E-12 9.1E-11 (3) (3) 2.7E-10 Y-91 2.5E+01 3.8E-09 1.4E-07 (3) (3) 7.8E-05 Y-92 2. 5E+01 2.5E-11 8. 5E-10 (3) (3) 1.5E-05 25

'I HI

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 2-1 (contd.)

Dose Conversion Factor (DF;)

Fish Bioaccumulation Total GI Nuclide F~ ~d Bone ~Th roid Liver Tract (pCi/kg per (mRem per pCi Ingested) pCi/liter)

Y-93 2. 5E+01 7.4E-ll 2.7E-09 (3) (3) 8.5E-05 Zr-95 3.3E+00 6.6E-09 3.1E-08 (3) 9.8E-09 3.1E-05 Nb-95 3.0E+04 1.9E-09 6.2E-09 (3) 3.5E-09 2.1E-05 Zr-97 3.3f+00 1.6E-10 1.7E-09 (3) 3.4E-10 1.1E-04 Nb-97 3.0E+04 4.8E-12 5.2E-11 (3) 1.3E-ll 4.9E-OS Mo-99 1.0E+01 8.2E-07 (3) (3) 4.3E-06 1.0E-05 Tc-'99m 1. 5E+01 8.9E-09 2.5E-10 (3) 7.0E-10 4.1E-07 Tc-101 1. 5E+01 3.6E-09 2.5E-10 (3) 3.7E-10 1.1E-21 RU-103 1.0E+01 8.0E-OS 1.9E-07 (3) (3) 2.2E-05 RU-105 1.0E+Ol 6.1E-09 1.5E-OS (3) (3) 9.4E-06 Rh-105 1.0E+Ol 5.8E-08 1.2E-07 (3) 8.9E-OS 1.4E-05 RU-106 1. OE+Ol 3.5E-07 2.8E-06 (3) (3) 1.8E-04 Ag-110m 2.3E+00 S.SE-OS 1.6E-07 (3) 1.5E-07 6.0E-05 Sb-124 1.0E+00 1.1E-06 2.8E-06 6.8E-09 5.3E-OS S.OE-05 Sb-125 1.0E+00 4.3E-07 1.8E-06 1.8E-09 2.0E-OS 2.0E-05 Sb-126 1.0E+00 4.2E-07 1.2E-06 7.0E-09 2.3E-08 9.4E-05 Sb-127 1.0E+00 9.9E-OS 2.6E-07 3.1E-09 5.7E-09 5.9E-05 Te-127 4.0E+02 2.4E-OS 1.1E-07 8.2E-OS 4.0E-08 8.7E-06 Te-129m 4.0E+02 1.8E-06 1.2E-05 4.0E-06 4.3E-06 5.8E-05

.Te-129 4.0E+02 7.7E-09 3.1E-OS 2.4E-OS 1.2E-OS 2.4E-OS Te-131m 4.0E+02 7.1E-07 1.7E-06 1.3E-06 8.5E-07 8.4E-05 Te-131 4.0E+02 6,2E-09 2.0E-08 1.6E-OS 8.2E-09 2.8E-09 Te-132 4.0E+02 1.5E-06 2.5E-06 1.8E-06 1.6E-06 7.7E-05 I-131 1. 5E+01 3.4E-06 4;2E-06 '.0E-03 6.0E-06 1.6E-06 I-132 1. 5E+01 1.9E-07 2.0E-07 1.9E-05 5.4E-07 1.0E-07 I-133 1. 5E+Ol 7.5E-07 1.4E-06 3.6E-04 2.5E-06 2.2E-06 I-134 1. 5E+01 1.0E-07 1.1E-07 5.0E-06 2.9E-07 2.5E-10 I-135 1. 5E+01 4.3E-07 4.4E-07 7.7E-05 1.2E-06 1.3E-06 Cs-134 2. OE+03 1.2E-04 6.2E-05 (3) 1.5E-04 2.6E-06 Cs-136 2. OE+03 1.9E-05 6.5E-06 (3) 2.6E-05 2.9E-06 Cs-137 2.0E+03 7.1E-05 8.0E-05 (3) 1.1E-04 2.1E-06 26

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 2-1 (contd.)

Oose Conversion Factor (DF;)

Fish Bioaccumulation Total GI Nuclide ~F"" I ~d Bone ~Th roid Liver Tract (pCi/kg per (mRem per pCi Ingested) pCi/liter)

Cs-138 2. OE+03 5.4E-08 5.5E-08 (3) 1.1E-07 4. 7E-13 Ba-139 4. OE+00 2.8E-09 9.7E-08 (3) 6.9E-11 1.7f-07 Ba-140 4. OE+00 1.3E-06 2.0E-05 (3) 2.6E-08 4.2E-05 La-140 2.5E+01 3.3E-10 2.5E-09 (3) 1.3E-09 9.3E-05 La-141 2. 5E+01 1.6E-11 3. 2E-10 (3) 9.9E-11 1.2E-05 La-142 2. 5E+01 1.5E-11 1.3E-10 . (3) 5.8E-11 4.3E-07 Ce-141 1.0E+00 7.2E-10 9.4E-09 (3) 6.3E-09 2.4E-05 Ce-143 1.0E+00 1.4E-10 1.7E-09 (3)'3) 1.2E-06 4.6E-05 Ce-144 1.0E+00 2.6E-OB 4.9E-07 2.0E-07 1.7E-04 Pr-143 2.5E+Ol 4.6E-10 9.2E-09 (3) 3.7E-09 4.0f-05 Nd-147 2.5E+01 4.4E-10 6.2E-09 (3) 7.3E-09 3.5f-05 Hf-179m 3.3E+00 4.8E-06 (3) (3) (3) 4.1E-05 Hf-181 3.3E+00 4.3E-06 (3) (3) (3) 4.1E-05 W-185 1.2E+03 1.4E-08 4.1E-07 (3) 1.4E-07 1.6E-05 W-187 1.2E+03 3.0E-08 1.0E-07 (3) 8.6E-08 2.8E-05 Np-239 1. OE+01 6.5E-11 1.2E-09 (3) 1.2E-10 2.4E-05

"'NRC NUREG/CR-4013.

NRC NUREG/CR-4013.

'"No data listed in NURfG/CR-4013.

(Use total body dose conversion factor as an approximation.)

27

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 2-2 INGESTION DOSE FACTORS A, FOR TOTAL BODY AND CRITICAL ORGAN (in mrem/hr per Ci/ml)

Liquid Effluent Total GI Nuclide ~Bod Bone ~Th roid Liver Tract H-3 1.8E-01 1.8E-01 1.8E-01 1.8E-01 Na-24 4. 1E+02 4. 1E+02 4. 1E+02 4. 1E+02 4. 1E+02 P-32 1.BE+06 4.6E+07 2.9E+06 5.3E+06 Cr-51 1.3E+00 7.7E-01 3.2E+02 Mn-54 8.3E+02 4. 4E+03 1.3E+04 Mn-56 1. 9E+01 1. 6E+02 3. 6E+03 Fe-55 1.1E+02 6.7E+02 4.6E+02 2.6E+02 Fe-59 9.4E+02 1.0E+03 2.4E+03 8.2E+03 Co-58 2. 1E+02 -

9.0E+01 1.BE+03 Co-60 5.7E+02 2.5E+02 4.8E+03 Ni-65 7.5E+00 1. 3E+02 1.7E+01 4. 1E+02 CU-64 4.7E+00 1.0E+Ol 8.6E+02 Zn-65 3. 4E+04 2.3E+04 7.2E+04 4.7E+04 Zn-69m l. 8E+02 8. 1E+02 2.0E+03 1.2E+05 As-76 1. 2E+03 1.1E+04 Br-82 2.3E+03 2.6E+03 Br-83 4. OE+Ol 5.8E+Ol Br-84 5.2E+Ol 4.1E-04 Rb-89 1.3E+02 1.9E+02 1.1E-ll Sr-89 6. 4 E+02 2. 3 E+04 3.6E+03 Sr-90 1.3E+04 6.3E+05 1.6E+04 Sr-91 1. 7E+O1 4. 1E+02 2.0E+03 Sr-92 6. 8E+00 1. 6E+02 3.1E+03 Y-90 1.6E-02 5.9E-01 6. 1E+03 Y-91m 2. 1E-04 5.5E-03 1.6E-02 Y-91 2.3E-01 8.5E+00 4.7E+03 Y-92 1.5E-03 5.2E-02 9.1E+02 Y-93 4.5E-03 1.6E-01 5.2E+03 28

t AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 2-2 (contd.)

Total GI Nuclide ~Bod Bone ~Th roid Liver Tract Zr-95 5.3E-02 2. 5E-01 7.9E-02 2.5fe02 Nb-95 1.4E+02 4.5E+02 2.5E+02 1.5E+06 Zr-97 1.3E-03 1.4E-02 2.7E-03 8.BE+02 Nb-97 3.5E-Ol 3.7E+00 9.3E-01 3.5E+03 Mo-99 2.0E+01 1.1E+02 2.5E+02 Tc-99m 3.3E-Ol 9. 2E-03 2.6E-02 1.5E+Ol Tc-101 1.3E-01 9.2E-03 1.4E-02 4.0E-14 RU-103 2.0E+00 4.7E+00 5.5E+02 Ru-105 1.5E-01 3.7E-Ol 2.3E+02 Rh-105 1.4E+00 3.0E+00 2.2E+00 3.5E+02 Ru-106 8.7E+00 6.9E+01 4.5E+03 Ag-110m 5. 6E-01 1.0E-00 9.5E-01 3.BE+02 Sb-124 3. 6E+00 9.0E+00 2.2E-02 1.7E-01 2.6E+02 Sb-125 1. 4E+00 5.8E+00 5.8E-03 6.5E-02 6.5E+01 Sb-126 1.4E+00 3.9E+00 2.3E-02 7.4E-02 3.0E+02 Sb-127 3.2E-01 8.4E-01 1.0E-02 1.8E-02 1.9E+02 Te-127 2. 3E+01 1.1E+02 7.9E+Ol 3. 8E+01 8.3E+03 Te-129m 1. 7E+03 1.2E+04 3.8E+03 4. 1E+03 5.6E+04 Te-129 7.4E+00 3. OE+01 2.3E+01 1. 2E+Ol 2.3E+01 Te-131m 6.8E+02 1. 6E+03 1.3E+03 8.2E+02 8. 1E+04 Te-131 5;9E+00 1. 9E+01 1.5E+01 7.9E+00 2. 7E+00 Te-132 1.4E+03 2. 4E+03 1.7E+03 1.5E+03 7.4E-04 I-131 1.3E+02 1. 5E+02 7.4E+04 2.2E+02 5.9E+01 I-132 7.0E+00 7. 4E+00 7.0E+02 2. OE+Ol 3.7E+00 I-133 2.8E+01 5. 1E+Ol 1.3E+04 9. 2E+01 8.1E+01 I-134 3.7E+00 4.0E+00 1.BE+02 1. 1E+01 9.2E-03 I-135 1.6E+01 l. 6E+01 2.BE+03 4. 4E+01 4. SE+01 Cs-134 5.8E+05 3.0E+05 7.2E+05 1. 3E+04 Cs-136 9. 1E+04 3. 1E+04 1.3E+05 1.4E+04 Cs-137 3.4E+05 3. 8E+05 5.3E+05 1.0E+04 Cs-138 2.6E+02 2.6E+02 5.3E+02 2.3E-03 29

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 2-2 (contd.)

Total GI Noc1ide ~Bod Bone ~Th roid Liver Tract Ba-139 2.9E-02 1.0E-OO 7.2E-04 1.8E+00 Ba-140 1. 4E+01 2. 1E+02 2.7E-01 4.4E+02 La-140 2.0E-02 1.5E-01 7.9E-02 5.6E+03 La-141 9.7E-04 1.9E-02 6.0E-03 7.3E+02 La-142 9. 1E-04 7.9E-03 3.5E-03 2.6E+01 Ce-141 2.3E-03 3.0E-02 2.0E-02 7.7E+01 Ce-143 4.5E-04 5.5E-03 3.9E+00 1.5E+02 Ce-144 8.4E-02 1.6E+00 6.5E-01 5.5E+02 Pr-143 2.8E-02 5.6E-01 2.3E-01 2.4E+03 Nd-147 2.7E-02 3.8E-01 4.4E-01 2. 1E+03 Hf-179m 4 'E+01 3. 6E+02 Hf-181 3.8E+01 3. 6E+02 W-185 4.0E+01 1.2E+03 4.0E+02 4. 6E+04 W-187 8.6E+01 2.9E+02 2.5E+02 8. 1E+04 Np-239 1;6E-03 3.0E-02 3.0E-03 6. OE+02

- No Ingestion Dose Factor (DF;) is listed in NUREG/CR-4013. (Total body dos'e factor value will be used as an approximation.)

30

5 4r AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 TABLE 2-3 INPUT PARAMETERS USED TO CALCULATE MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL DOSE FROM LI UID EFFLUENTS Drinkin Water River Dilution: 50,000 River Transit Time: 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months Usage Factors: Adult = 730 1/yr Teenager 510 1/yr Child 510 1/yr Infant 330 1/yr Boatin and A uatic Food River Dilution: 500 Transit Time: 2 hours Usage Factors: (Aquatic Food) Adult = 21 kg/yr Teenager 16 kg/yr Child = 6.9 kg/yr Infant = 0 (Boating) Adult = 100 hr/yr Teenager 100 hr/yr Child = 85 hr/yr Infant = 0 Recreation River Dilution:

~

20,000 Shoreline Width Factor: ~ 0.2 Usage Factors: Shoreline Activities: Adult 90 hr/yr Teenager 500 hr/yr Child = 105 hr/yr Infant = 0 Swimming: Adult = 18 hr/yr Teenager = 100 hr/yr Child = 21 hr/yr Irri ated Foodstuffs River Dilution: 50)000 River Transit Time: 4 hours Leafy

~Ve etabl as Milk Meat ~Ve etables Food Delivery Time: 14 days 48 hours5.555556e-4 days 0.0133 hours 7.936508e-5 weeks 1.8264e-5 months 20 days 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months Usage Factors:

, Adult 520 kg/yr 310 1/yr 110 kg/yr 64 kg/yr Teenager 630 kg/yr 400 1/yr 65 kg/yr 42 kg/yr Child 520 kg/gr 330 1/yr 41 kg/yr 26 kg/yr Monthly Irrigation Rate: 180 1/m 200 1/m 160 200 1/m Annual Yield:

1/m'.0 5.0 kg/m 1.3 1/m kg/m~ 1.5 kg/m Annual Growing Period: 70 days 30 days 130 days 70 days Annual 50-Mile Production: 3.5E+09 kg 2.8E+08 L 2.3E+07 kg 1.9E+06 kg 31

AMEND)'1ENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 SUMPS COOLING TOWER Radwaste Bldg Waste Surge Waste Sample BLOWOOWN LINE Tur bine Bldg and Collector Tanks (TWO)

Dr gwell Tanks Floor Drain Floor Drain Collector Sample MISC WASTE Tank Tank Reactor Bldg Distillate Detergent Tanks Or ain Tanks (TWO)

Filters and Demineralizers (Solid Waste)

Chemical Waste Tanks Shop Oecon Condensate Plant Chem Pumps Storage Use Decon Drain Tanks (TWO)

COLUMBIA Reactor Bldg RIVER Turbine Bldg SIMPLIFIED BLOCK DIAGRAM OF LIOUIO WASTE SYSTEM Figure 2-1 32

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 N R Condensate Phase Oewatering Disposal RWCU Separ ator Liners Site EOR/FOR Radwaste Bead Qry hctive Compactor Disposal Waste Site SINPLIFIED BLOCK OIAGRAN OF SOLID RAOWASTE SYSTEN Figure 2-2 33

~ ~

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 3.0 GASEOUS EFFLUENTS DOSE CALCULATIONS The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission's computer program GASPAR II can be used to perform environmental dose analyses for releases of radioactive efflu-ents from WNP-2 into the atmosphere. The analyses estimate radiation dose to individuals and population groups from inhalation, ingestion (terrestrial foods); and external exposure (ground and plume) pathways. The calculated doses provide information for determining compliance with Appendix I of 10 CFR Part 50. This computer code has the subroutine "PARTS" which can be used for calculating dose factors.

The NRC computer program GASPAR II supplements the ODCN in monthly, quarterly and annual dose equivalent determinations from gaseous effluents. The method which is normally employed to calculate the annual dose to the maximally exposed organ sums the dose to the maximally exposed organ for each quarter.

As a result, the maximum annual organ dose may not represent the maximum dose to any one particular organ for that particular year. Actual specific organ doses will be less than or equal to this calculated value.

Both the ODCH equations and the NRC GASPAR II computer program for estimating the highest dose to any organ for a particular age group provides conservatism in calculating maximum organ doses. This conservatism is recognized and is intentional.

3. 1 Introduction WNP-2 gaseous effluents are released on a continuous basis; in addition, batch releases also occur when containment and mechanical vacuum pump purges are performed and when the off-gas treatment system operates in the charcoal bypass mode. The gaseous effluents released from WNP-2 will meet Requirement for Operability at the site boundary.

'

k

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 Figure 3-1 delineates the WNP-2 Site boundary, which for dose calculation pur-poses, is considered circular with a radius of 1.2 miles. There are several low occupancy unrestricted locations within the site boundary. These loca-tions, with the exception of the WNP-2 visitor center, are not continuously controlled by the Supply System. The locations are:

1. Wye burial site - normally controlled by DOE.

2. DOE train - two railroad lines pass through the site (approximately 3 miles of line). According to DOE, the train makes one round trip a day, through the site at an average speed of 20 mph, 5 days a week, 52 weeks/year.

3. BPA Ashe Substation - occupied 2080 hour0.0241 days 0.578 hours 0.00344 weeks 7.9144e-4 months s/year. These people are not normally controlled by the Supply System but are involved in activities directly in support of WNP-2.

34a

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992

4. WNP Supply System Visitor Center - assumed occupied 8 hrs/yr by non-Supply System individuals.

5. WNP-1 - occupied 2080 hrs/yr. This location is controlled by the Supply System. However, activities are not in direct support of WNP-2.

6. WNP occupied 2080 hrs/yr. This location is controlled by the Supply System. However, activities are not in direct support of WNP-2.

All other locations listed in Figure 3-1 support WNP-2 activities and are controlled by the Supply System. Figure 3-2 provides a simplified block diagram of the gaseous radwaste system for the reactor, turbine and radwaste buildings. Figure 3-3 provides a simplified block diagram for the off-gas treatment system.

Air doses and doses to individuals at these locations were calculated based on the NRC GALE code design base mixture, location specific estimated occupancy, and X/gs from XO(DOg. (Note: Desert Sigmas were used in calculating X/g and D/g values, and are listed in Table 3-10 to 3-12). These doses are listed in Tables 3-16 and 3-17 along with the doses to the maximum exposed individual, The most likel ex osed member of the ublic is considered to be residing in Taylor Flats (4.2 miles ESE of WNP-2). This is the closest residential area with the highest X/g and D/g values.

3.2 Gaseous Effluent Radiation Monitorin S stem 3.2. 1 Hain Plant Release Point The Hain Plant Release is instrument monitored for gaseous radioactivity prior to discharge to the environment via the main plant vent release point. Par-ticulates and iodine activity are accumulated in filters which will be changed and analyzed as per Periodic Test and Inspection 6.2.2. 1.2 (4. 11.2. 1.2) and Table 6.2.2. 1.2-1 (4. 11-2). The effluent is supplied from: the gland seal 35

k AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 exhauster, mechanical vacuum pumps, treated off gas, standby gas treatment, and exhaust air from the entire reactor building's ventilation.

Two 100-percent capacity vanaxial fans supply 80,000 CFM ventilation air. One is normally operating, the other is in standby. The radiation monitors are located on the ventilation exhaust plenum.

Effluent monitoring consists of a low range beta scintillator, an intermediate range beta scintillator and two ion chamber LOCA monitors. The beta scintil-lators are mounted in thick lead shielded chambers. The low range beta scintillator has an approximate response of 80 cpm/pCi/cc to Kr-85, and 50 cpm/pCi/cc to Xe-133 and a meter range of 10 - 10 cpm. The intermediate range has a response from 10' 10'Ci/cc Xe-133 equivalent, and reads in panel meter units (PMU) with a meter range of 10 - 10'MU.

The readouts and recorder are located in the main control room panel BD-RAD-24. Power is provided from 125 VDC divisional buses. This monitor has no control function but annunciates in the main control room. The alarm will initiate proper action as defined in the WNP-2 plant procedures.

3.2.2 Radwaste Buildin Ventilation Exhaust Monitor The radwaste building ventilation exhaust monitoring system monitors the radioactivity in the exhaust air prior to discharge. Radioactivity can originate from: radwaste tank vents, laboratory hoods, and various cubicles housing liquid process treatment equipment and systems.

The radwaste building exhaust system has three 50-percent capacity exhaust filter units of 42,000 cfm capacity. Each exhaust unit has a medium-efficiency prefilter, a high efficiency particulate air filter (HEPA) and two centrifugal fans. Total exhaust flow will vary as the combined exhaust unit maintains a radwaste building differential pressure of -0.25 inches H,O to the environment.

Particulate and iodine air sample filters are changed weekly for laboratory 36

~

a I

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 analysis. After the particulate and iodine filters, the air sample streams are combined in a manifold prior to being monitored by a beta scintillator.

The beta scintillators, on the 487'evel are mounted in lead shielded chambers. The low range beta scintillator has an approximate response of 80 cpm/pCi/cc to'r-85, and 50 cpm/pCi/cc to Xe-133 and a meter range of

. 10 - 10 cpm. The intermediate range has a response from 10 - 10 pCi/cc Xe-133 equivalent, and reads in panel meter units (PMU) with a meter range of 10 - 10'MU. The readouts and recorder are located in the main control room panel BD-RAD-24. Power is provided from 125 VDC divisional buses. This monitor has no control functions but annunciates in the main control room.

The alarm will initiate proper action as defined in the WNP-2 plant procedures.

3.2.3 Turbine Buildin Ventilation Exhaust Monitor This monitoring system detects fission and the activation products from the turbine building air which may be present due to leaks from the turbine and other primary components in the building.

The turbine building main exhaust system consists of four roof-mounted cen-trifugal fans which draw air from a central exhaust plenum. Three fans operate continuously, with one in standby to provide a flow of 260,000 cfm.

A representative sample is extracted from the exhaust vent and passed through a particulate and charcoal filter. The air sample then passes to a beta scintillator.

The beta scintillators are mounted in lead shielded chambers. The low range beta scintillator has an approximate response of 80 cpm/pCi/cc to Kr-85, and 50 cpm/pCi/cc to Xe-133 and a meter range of 10 - 10 cpm. The intermediate range has a response from 10 - 10'Ci/cc Xe-133 equivalent, and reads in panel meter units (PMU) with a meter range of 10 - 10'MU. The monitors are on the 525'evel of the radwaste building and the readouts and the recorder are located in the main control room panel BD-RAD-24. Power is provided from 37

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 the 125 VDC divisional buses. This monitor has no control functions but annunciates in the main control room. The alarm will initiate proper action as defined in the WNP-2 plant procedures.

3.3 10 CFR 20 Release Rate Limits Limits for release of gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the site boundary are stated in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1). The dose rate at these areas due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site shall be limited to the following values:

(a) "The dose rate limit for noble gases shall be <500 mrem/yr to the total body and <3000 mrem/yr to the skin."

(b) "The dose rate limit for all radioiodines and for all radio-active materials in particulate form and radionuclides other than noble gases with half-lives greater than eight days shall be gl500 mrem/yr to any organ."

3.3.1 Noble Gases In order to comply with Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. 1, (3. 11.2. 1) the following equations must hold:

Whole body:

Ki [(~XO)Q;+ (WXQ) Q, )] <500 mrem/yr I

Skin:

[(L, + 1.1H,.) ((7XQ)Q., + (7XQ) Q. )] < 3000 mrem/yr (2) e 38

~ m, ~~*

i'l

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 3.3.2

~ ~ Radioiodines and Particulates Part "b" of Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1) requires that the release rate limit for all radioiodines and radioactive materials in particulate form and radionuclides other than noble gases must meet the following relationship:

Any organ:

gI P, .+

[W(j, W, 0J g1500 mrem/yr (3)

The terms used in Equations (1) through (3) are defined as follows:

K; The total body dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m').

The skin dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m ).

M; The air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide in mrad/yr per l.

pCi/m'unit conversion constant of 1 mrem/mrad converts air dose to skin dose).

p; The dose parameter for all radionuclides other than noble gases for the inhalation pathway, (mrem/yr per pCi/m') and for food and ground plane pathways, m (mrem/yr per pCi/sec).

The dose factors are based on the critical individual organ and the most restrictive age group.

Q,. The release rate of radionuclide i in gaseous effluent from mixed mode release. The main plant release point is a partially elevated mixed mode release (pCi/sec).

39

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Q;, The release rate of radionuclide i in gaseous effluent from all ground level releases (pCi/sec).

(sec/m'). For partially elevated mixed mode releases from the main plant vent release point. The highest calculated partially elevated annual average relative concentration for any area at and beyond the site boundary.

(sec/m ). For all Turbine Building and Radwaste releases.

The highest calculated ground level annual average relative concentration for any area at and beyond the site boundary.

W The highest calculated annual average dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to an individual at the controlling location due to all ground level releases.

(sec/m ). For the inhalation pathway. The location is at and beyond the site boundary in the sector of maximum concentration.

m . For ground plane pathways. The location is at and beyond the site boundary in the sector of maximum concentration.

WM The highest calculated annual average dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to an individual at the controlling location due to partially elevated releases:

WM sec/m'. For inhalation pathway. The location is at and beyond the site boundary in the sector of maximum concentration.

m . For ground plane pathways. The location is at and beyond the site boundary in the sector of maximum concentration.

40

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 The factors, L; and M;, relate the radionuclide airborne concentrations to var>ous ose ra es assum>ng a semi-infinite cloud. These factors are listed in Table B-I of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1, and in Table 3-1 of this manual.

The values used in the equations for the implementation of Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. I (3. 11.2. 1) are based upon the maximum long-term annual average X/Q at and beyond the site boundary. Atmospheric dispersion factors will be evaluated annually from the WNP-2 meteorological data'base and if significantly different than preoperational data as is displayed in Tables 3-10 and 3-11, then the tables will be updated. This comparison began with 1989 data. Table 3-2 provides typical locations based on the current Land Use Census (LUC) with pathways for use in dose determinations. Table 3-3 provides these typical locations with long term X/Q and D/Q values which may be used if current annual averages are not available.

The X/Q and D/Q values listed in Tables 3-10 and 3-11 reflecting correctly acquired meteorological data, January 1, 1984 - January 1, 1990 may be utilized in GASPAR II Computer runs.

3.3.2. 1 Dose Parameter for Radionuclide i (P.,)

The dose parameters used in Equation (3) are based on:

Inhalation and ground plane. (Note: Food pathway is not applicable to WNP-2 since no food is grown at or near the restricted area boundary.)

2. The annual average continuous release meteorology at the site boundary.

3. The critical organ for each radionuclide (thyroid for radioiodine).

'. The most restrictive age group.

Calculation of I (Inhalation):

P.

1 The following equation will be used to cal-41

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 culate P.

1

( Inhalation).

I P. (Inhalation) = K"(BR) DFA,. (mrem/yr per Ci/m ) (5) where:

KA A constant of conversion, 10 ppCi/Ci.

BR The breathing rate of the child age group, 3700 m /yr.

DFA; The critical organ inhalation dose factor for the child age group for the ith radionuclide in mrem/pCi. The total body is considered as an organ in the selection of DFA;.

The inhalation dose factor for DFA; for the child age group is listed in Table E-9 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1, and Table 3-4 of this manual.

Resolving the units yields:

I P. = ( Inhalation) = (3.7 x 10') (DFA,.) (mrem/yr per pCi/m') (6)

I (Inhalation) values The P.

1 for the child age group are tabulated in Table 3-4 of this manual.

3.4 10 CFR 50 Release Rate Limits The requirements pertaining to 10 CFR 50 release rate limits are specified in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.2 (3. 11.2.2) and 6.2.2.3 (3. 11.2.3).

Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.2 (3. 11.2.2) deals with the air dose from noble gases and requires that the air dose at and beyond the site boundary due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents shall be limited to the

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 following:

(a) "During any calendar quarter, to ~5 mrad for gamma radiation and to glO mrad for beta radiation."

(b) "During any calendar year, to gl0 mrad for gamma radiation and <20 mrad for beta radiation."

Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.3 (3. 11.2.3) deals with radioiodines, tritium, and radioactive materials in particulate form, and requires that the dose to an individual from radioiodines, tritium and radioactive materials in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released to unrestricted areas shall be limited to the following:

(a) "During any calendar quarter, to <7.5 mrem."

(b) "During any calendar year, to <15 mrem."

3.4.1

~ ~ Noble Gases Re uirement for 0 erabilit 6.2.2.2 3.11.2.2 The air dose at and beyond the site boundary due to noble gases released in the gaseous effluent will be determined by using the following equations.

a. During any calendar quarter, for gamma radiation:

3.17 x 10 a

g [N,.(X/Q),Q,,

I

+ (X/q),q. + (~X Q) Q,.+ (X/q) q,.] <0 mrad (0)

During any calendar quarter, for beta radiation:

3. 17 x 10 ' N.,[(X/Q),Q,, + (X/q),q,,,(+ (~X Q) Q,

+ (X/q) q, <10 mrad (0)

I ]

43

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992

b. During any calendar year, for gamma radiation:

3.17 x 10 ' II,[(~X Q) Q,

+ (X/q) q, + (~X Q) Q,

+ (X/q) q, <10 mrad (10)

I

]

During any calendar year, for beta radiation:

3.17 x 10 a g

I N, [(~XQ) Q,, + (X/q) q,. + (~XQ) .+ (X/q)

Q, q,. ] <20 mrad (11) where:

The air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, in mrad/yr per pCi/m'H,.

values are listed in Table 3-1).

The air dose factor due to beta emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, in mrad/yr per pCi/m'N,.

values are listed in Table 3-1),

For ground level release points. The highest calculated annual average relative concentration for area at and beyond the site area boundary for long-term releases (greater than 500 hr/yr). (Sec/m')

For ground level release points'he relative concentration for areas at and beyond the site area boundary for short-term releases (equal to or less than 500 hr/yr).

(Sec/m )

For partially elevated release points. The highest

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 calculated annual average relative concentration for areas at and beyond the site boundary for long-term releases (greater than 500 hr/yr). (Sec/m')

(x/q) For partially elevated release points. The relative concentration for areas at and beyond the site boundary for short-term releases (equal to or less than 500 hr/yr).

(Sec/m )

Cm The average release of noble gas radionuclides in gaseous effluents, i, for short-term releases (equal to or less than 500 hr/yr) from the main plant release point, in pCi.

Releases shall be cumulative over the calendar quarter or year, as appropriate.

The average release of noble gas radionuclides in gaseous effluents, i, for short-term releases (equal to or less than 500 hr/yr) from Radwaste and Turbine Building, in pCi, Releases shall be cumulative over the calendar quarter or year, as appropriate.

Q; The average release of noble gas radionuclides in gaseous releases, i, for long-term releases (greater than 500 hr/yr) from the main plant release point, in pCi. Release shall be

'h over the calendar quarter or year, as

'umulative appropriate.

Q;, The average release of noble gas radionuclides in gaseous effluents, i, for long-term releases (greater than 500 hr/yr) from Radwaste and Turbine Building, in pCi.

Releases shall be cumulative over the calendar quarter or year, as appropriate.

3. 17 x 10' The inverse of the number of seconds in a year.

3.4.2 Radioiodines Tritium and Particulates Re uirement for 0 erabilit

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2.2.3 3.11.2.3 The following equation calculates the dose to an individual from radioiodines, tritium, and radioactive material in particulate form with half-lives greater than eight days in gaseous effluents released to the unrestricted areas:

a. During any calendar quarter:

3.17x10'g R,.[WR,. +w q, +W,q,, +w,q,,]<7.5mrem (12)

I

b. During any calendar year:

3.17 x 10' R.,

[ W 0., +w q., +W,q.+ w,q.] <15 mrem (13)

I where:

0;70;, The releases of radionuclides, radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases in gaseous effluents, i, for long-term releases greater than 500 hr/yr, in pCi. Releases shall be cumulative over the calendar quarter or year, as appropriate (m is for mixed mode releases, g is for ground level releases).

qmI q13 The releases of radionuclides, radioactive materials in particulate form, and radionuclides other than noble gases in gaseous effluents, i, for short-term releases equal to or less than 500 hr/yr, in pCi. Releases shall be cumulative over the calendar quarter or year as appropriate (m is for mixed mode releases, g is for ground level releases).

W,W The dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to an 46

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 individual at the controlling location for long-term (greater than 500 hr.) releases (m is for mixed mode releases, g is for ground level releases).

(~Z q) for the inhalation pathway, in sec/m'.

(pjq) for the food and ground plane pathways in meters'.

w $ w The dispersion parameter for estimating the dose to an individual at the controlling location for short-term (less than 500 hr.) releases (m is for mixed mode releases, g is for ground level releases).

(7Xqq) for the inhalation pathway, in sec/m .

(~D q) for the food and ground Plane Pathways in meters'.

3.17 x 10 The inverse of the number of seconds in a year.

R; The dose factor for each identified radionuclide, i, in m (mrem/yr per pCi/sec) or mrem/yr per pCi/m'.

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 3.4.2.1 Dose Parameter for Radionuclide i (R;)

The R, values used in Equations (12) and (13) of this section are calculated separately for each of the following potential exposure pathways:

Inhalation Ground plane contamination Grass-cow/goat-milk pathway Grass-cow-meat pathway Vegetation pathway Monthly dose assessments for WNP-2 gaseous effluent will be done for all age groups.

Calculation of I R.

1 (Inhalation Pathway Factor)

I R. (Inhalation) = K'BR). (DFA,.). (mrem/yr per pCi/m') (14) where:

R 1

The inhalation pathway factor (mrem/yr per pCi/m ).

K' constant of unit conversion, 10 pCi/pCi.

(BR), The breathing rate of the receptor of age group (a) in meter'/yr. ( Infant = 1400, child = 3,700, teen = 8,000, adult = 8,000. From P.32 NUREG-0133).

48

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 (DFA;), The maximum organ inhalation dose factor for receptor of age group a for the ith radionuclide (mrem/pCi). The total body is considered as an organ in the selection of (DFA;)..

(DFA;). values are listed in Tables E-7 through E-10 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109 manual, Revision 1 and NUREG/CR-4013.

I Values of R. are listed in Table 3-5.

1 G

Calculation of R.

i (Ground Plane Pathway Fa'ctor)

G R. (Ground Plane) = K"K (SF)(DFG,.) (1-e "')/A,. (m' mrem/yr per pCi/sec) (15) where:

G R.

1 Ground plane pathway factor (m' mrem/yr per pCi/sec).

KA A conversion constant of (10'Ci/pCi).

K A conversion constant - (8760 hr/yr).

The decay constant for the ith radionuclide (sec').

Exposure time, 6.31 x 10'ec (20 years).

DFG; The ground plane dose conversion factor for the ith radionuclide, as listed in Table E-6 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1 and NUREG/CR-4013 (mrem/hr per pCi/m ).

SF Shielding Factor (dimensionless)--0.7 if building is present, as suggested in Table E-15 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision l.

G The values of R.

1 are listed in Table 3-5 of this manual.

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 C

Calculation of R. (Grass-Cow/Goat-Milk Pathway Factor)

C R. (Grass-Cow/Goat-Milk Factor) =

1 K' "

Op(U, )

F (r)(DFL,.),

f,f, (l-ff,)e ~~ e

-A,t, (16)

I W Y Y, (m' mrem/yr per pCi/sec) where:

K' constant of unit conversion, 10'Ci/pCi.

The cow/goat consumption rate, in kg/day (wet weight).

U, The receptor's milk consumption rate for age a, in liters/yr.

Yp The agricultural productivity by unit area of pasture feed grass, in kg/m .

The agricultural productivity by unit area of stored feed, in kg/m'.

F The stable element transfer coefficients, in days/liter.

Fraction of deposited activity retained on feed grass.

(DFL;). The maximum organ ingestion dose factor for the ith radionuclide for the receptor in age group a, in mrem/pCi (Tables E-11 to E-14 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1 and NUREG/CR-4013).

The decay constant for the ith radionuclide, in sec '.

50

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 The decay constant for removal of activity on leaf and plant surfaces by weathering, 5.73 x 10 sec'corresponding to a 14-day half-life).

The transport time from pasture to animal, to milk, to receptor, in sec.

The transport time from pasture, to harvest, to animal, to milk, to receptor, in sec.

Fraction of the year that the cow/goat is on pasture (dimensionless).

Fraction of the cow/goat feed that is pasture grass while the cow is on pasture (dimensionless).

C NOTE: For radioiodines, multiply R. value by 0.5 to account 1

for the fraction of elemental iodine available for deposition.

The input parameters used for calculating R.C are listed in Table 3-6. The 1

individual pathway. dose parameters for R. are tabulated in Tables 3-5a through 1

3-5d.

For Tritium:

C In calculating RT pertaining to tritium in milk, the airborne concentration rather than the deposition will be used:

C R (Grass-Cow/Goat-Milk Factor) =

T K"K F gU(DFL,.), [0.75(0.5/H)] (mrem/yr per pCi/m ) (17) where:

KA A constant unit conversion, 10'Ci/pCi.

51

I AHENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 K A constant of unit conversion, 10'm/kg.

Absolute humidity of the atmosphere, in gm/m'.

0.75 The fraction of total feed that is water.

0.5 The ratio of the specific activity of the feed grass water to the atmospheric water.

H Calculation of R. (Grass-Cow-Heat Pathway Factor) 1 H

R. (Grass-Cow-Heat 1

Factor)-

I 0F(U,p) Spy, (1-fpf ) e -A,q (18) e Y,

(m' mrem/yr per pCi/sec) where:

K')

A constant unit conversion, 10 pCi/pCi.

The stable element transfer coefficients, in days/kg.

U,p The receptor's meat consumption rate for age a, in kg/yr.

The transport time from pasture to receptor, in sec.

The transport time from crop field to receptor, in sec.

H NOTE: For radioiodines, multiply R. value by 0.5 to account 1

for the fraction of elemental iodine available for deposition.

The input parameters used for calculation R.H (18) are listed in Table 3-7.

The individual pathway dose parameters for R.1 are tabulated in Tables 3-5a through 3-5d.

52

AMENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 For Tritium:

k M

In calculating the RT for tritium in meat, the airborne concentration is used rather than the deposition rate. The following equation is used to calculate H

the RT values for tritium:

H R (Grass-Cow-Heat Pathway) =

T K "Ke (DFL(). ] [ 0.75(0.5/U) ] (mrem/yr per pCi/m ) (19)

[ F()U Where the terms are as defined in Equations (16) through (18), R.H values for 1

tritium pertaining to the infant age group is zero since there is no meat consumption by this age group.

V Calculation of R. (Vegetation Pathway Factor) 1 V

R.

1 (Vegetation Pathway Factor)-

K'DFL) Y(gg) ia [U l aLng "f e "e + U'f e ~~

]

(2o)

(m' mrem/yr per pCi/sec) where:

K A constant of unit conversion, 10'pCi/pCi.

L The consumption rate of fresh leafy vegetation by the a

receptor in age group a, in kg/yr.

s The consumption rate of stored vegetation by the receptor in a

age group a, in kg/yr.

53

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 The fraction of the annual intake of fresh leafy vegetation grown locally.

The fraction of the annual intake of stored vegetation grown locally.

The average time between harvest of leafy vegetation and its consumption, in seconds.

"

The average time between harvest of stored vegetation and its consumption, in seconds.

Y The vegetation area density, in kg/m .

V NOTE: For radioiodines, multiply R.1 value by 0.5 to account for the fraction of elemental iodine available for deposition.

V The input parameters for calculation R. are listed in Table 3-8. The 1

V individual pathway dose parameters for R. are tabulated in Tables 3-5a through 1

3-5d.

All other items are as defined in Equations (16) through (18).

For Tritium:

In calculating the RT for tritium, the concentration of tritium in vegetation is based on airborne concentration rather than the deposition rate. The V

following equation is used to calculate RT for tritium:

V R (Vegetation Pathway Factor) =

K"K [(U,"f+ U;f ) (DFL,.),] [0.75(0.5/H)] (mrem/yr per pCi/m ) (21) 54

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 Where all terms have been defined above and in Equations (16) through (18),

the RT value for tritium is zero for the infant age group due to zero vegetation consumption rate by that age group. The input parameters needed for solving Equations (20) and (21) are listed in Table 3-8.

3.4.3 Annual Doses At S ecial Locations The Radioactive Effluent Release Report submitted within 60 days after January 1 of each year shall include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive gaseous effluents to "Members of the Public," due to their activities inside the site boundary during the report period.

Annual doses within the site boundary have been determined for several locations using the NRC GASPAR computer code and source term data from Table 11.3-7 of the FSAR. These values are listed in Tables 3-16 and 3-17. Of the locations listed within the site boundary, only two, the DOE Train and WNP-2 Visitor Center are considered as being occupied by a "Member of the Public."

Annual doses to the maximum exposed "Hember of the Public" shall be determined for an individual at the WNP-2 Visitor Center based on occupancy of 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months per year due to it being the higher of the two locations.

3.5 Com liance with Re uirement for 0 erabilit 6.2.2.4 3. 11.2.4 Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.4 (3. 11.2.4) states:

"The GASEOUS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be in operation in either the norm'al or charcoal bypass mode. The charcoal bypass mode shall not be used unless the offgas post-treatment radiation monitor is OPERABLE as specified in Table 6. 1.2. 1-1 (3.3.7. 11-1)."

"RELEVANT CONDITIONS: Whenever the main condenser steam jet air ejector (evacuation) system is in operation."

Prior to placing the gaseous radwaste treatment system in the charcoal bypass mode, the alarm setpoints on the main plant vent release monitor shall be set to account for the increased percentages of short-lived noble gases. Noble gas percentages shall be based either on actual measured values or on primary 55

A,I ANENDHENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 coolant design base noble gas concentration percentages adjusted for 30-minute decay. Table 3-15 lists the percentage values for 30-minute decay.

3.5. 1 Pro 'ection of Doses The projected doses due to WNP-2 gaseous effluent releases will be determined at least once per 31 days as stated in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.5 (3. 11.2.5). The projected dose when averaged over 31 days is not to exceed 0.3 mrem to any organ in a 31 day period to areas at and beyond the site boundary. Dose projection values will be determined by using a previous 31 day "Gaspar Output" (NRC Computer Code) for the site boundary and/or an area beyond the site boundary. Based on operating data, the projected dose should be adjusted accordingly to compensate for those anticipated changes in operations and/or source term values.

3.6 Calculation of Gaseous Effluent Honitor Alarm Set pints 3.6.1 Introduction The following procedure is used to ensure that the dose rate in the unrestricted areas due to noble gases in the WNP-2 gaseous effluent do not exceed 500 mrem/yr to the whole body or 3000 mrem/yr to the skin. The initial setpoints determination is calculated using a conservative radionuclide mix obtained from the WNP-2 GALE code. Once the plant is operating and sufficient measurable process fission gases are in the effluent, then the actual radionuclide mix will be used to calculate the alarm setpoint.

3.6.2 Set oint Determination for 'all Gaseous Release Paths The setpoints for gaseous effluent are based on instantaneous noble gas dose rates. Sampling and analysis of radioiodines and radionuclides in particulate form will be performed in accordance with Requirement for Operability to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 20 and 10 CFR 50 Appendix I limits. The three release points will be partitioned such that their sum does not exceed 100 percent of the limit. Originally, the setpoints will be set at 40 percent for 56

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 the Reactor Building, 40 percent for the Turbine Building and 20 percent for the Radwaste Building. These percentages could vary at the plant discretion, should the operational conditions warrant such change. However, the combined releases due to variations in the setpoints will not result in doses which exceed the limit stated in Requirement for Operability. Both skin dose and whole body setpoints will be calculated and the lower limit will be used.

3.6.2. 1 Set pints Calculations Based on Whole Bod Dose Limits The fraction (x,.) of the total gaseous radioactivity in each gaseous effluent release path j for each noble gas radionuclide i will be determined by using the following equation:

x,,

= (dimensionless)

M,,

"

MT,.

(22) where:

M;; The measured individual concentration of radionuclide i in the gaseous effluent release path j (pCi/cc).

The measured total concentration of all noble gases identified in the gaseous effluent release path j (pCi/cc).

Based on Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1), the maximum acceptable release rate of all noble gases in the gaseous effluent release path j is calculated by using the following equation:

F,. 500 (pCi/sec)

(23) 57

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 where:

0TJ The maximum acceptable release rate (pCi/sec) of all noble gases in the gaseous effluent release path j (pCi/cc).

Fraction of total dose allocated to release path j.

500 Whole body dose rate limit of 500 mrem/yr as specified in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. l.a (3. 11.2. l.a).

X/g; Maximum normalized diffusion coefficient of effluent release path j at'nd beyond the site boundary (sec/m ). Turbine Building and Radwaste Building values are based on average annual ground level values. Hain plant vent release values are for mixed mode and may be either short term or average annual value dependent upon type of release.

The total whole body dose factor due to gamma emission from noble gas nuclide i (mrem/yr per pCi/m') (as listed in Table B-1 of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1).

As defined in Equation (22).

I Total number of radionuclides in the gaseous effluent.

Different release pathways.

The total maximum acceptable concentration (C7j) of noble gas radionuclides in the gaseous effluent release path j (pCi/cc) will be calculated by using the following equation:

(24) 58

AMENDMENT NO. ll AUGUST 1992 where:

The total allowed concentration of all noble gas radionuclides in the gaseous effluent release path j (pCi/cc).

The maximum acceptable release rate (pCi/sec) of all noble gases in the gaseous effluent release path j.

RJ The effluent release rate (cc/sec) at the point of release.

To determine the maximum acceptable concentration (C;;) of noble gas radio-nuclide i in the gaseous effluent for each individual noble gas in the gaseous effluent (pCi/cc), the following equation will be used:

C,,

= x,,C~,. (pCi/cc) (25) where:

x;; and C>> are as defined in Equations (22) and (24) respectively, the gaseous effluent monitor alarm setpoint will then be calculated as follows:

m C.R.j. = g C..E..(cpm) (26)

I+1 where:

C.R.j Count rate above background (cpm) for gaseous release path j.

C;; The maximum acceptable concentration of noble gas nuclide i in the gaseous effluent release path j pCi/cc.

59

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 E8 Detection efficiency of the gaseous effluent monitor j for noble gas i (cpm/pCi/cc).

3.6.2.2 Set pints Calculations Based on Skin Dose Limits The method for calculating the setpoints to ensure compliance with the skin dose limits specified in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. l.a (3. 11.2. l.a) is similar to the one described for whole body dose limits (Section 3.6.2.1 of this manual), except Equation (27) will be used instead of Equation (23) for determining maximum acceptable release rate (Qr).

F,. 3000 QTJ (pCi/sec)

(27) where:

QTJ The maximum acceptable release rate of all noble gases in the gaseous effluent release path j in pCi/sec.

X/Q; The maximum annual normalized diffusion coefficient for release path j at and beyond the site boundary (sec/m').

Fraction of total allowed dose.

The skin dose factor due to beta emission for each identified noble gas radionuclide i in mrem/yr per pCi/m'L; values are listed in Table 3-1).

The air dose factor due to gamma emissions for each identified noble gas radionuclide, in mrad/yr per pCi/m'M, values are listed in Table 3-1).

60

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 1.1 A conversion factor to convert dose in mrad to dose equivalent in mrem.

3000 Skin dose rate limit of 3000 mrem/yr as specified in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1).

61

Table 3-1 DOSE FACTORS FOR NOBLE GASES AND DAUGHTERS*

Total Body Gamma Air Beta Air Dose Factor Skin Dose Factor Dose Factor Dose Factor Radionuclide K. L. H. N.

(mrem/yr per yCi/m3) (mrem/yr per I,Ci/m3) (mrad/yr per yCi/m3) (mrad/yr per ICi/m3)

Kr-85m 1.17E<03** 1.46E+03 1.23E+03 1.97E+03 Kr-85 1.61E+Ol 1.34E+03 1.72E+01 1.95E+03 Kr-87 5.92E+03 9.73E+03 6. 17E+03 1.03E+04 Kr-88 1.47E+04 2.37E+03 1.52E+04 2.93E+03 Kr-89 1.66E+04 1.01E+04 1.73E+04 1.06E+04 Kr-90 1.56E+04 7.29E+03 1.63E+04 7.83E+03 Xe-131m 9.15E+01 4.76E+02 1.56E+02 1.11E+03 Xe-133m 2. 51E+02 9.94E+02 3.27E+02 1.48E+03 Xe-133 2.94E+02 3.06E+02 3.53E+02 1.05E+03 Xe-135m 3.12E+03 7. 11E+02 3.36E+03 7.39E+02 Xe-135 1.81E+03 1.86E+03 1.92E+03 2.46E+03 Xe-137 1.42E+03 1.22E+04 1.51E+03 1.27E+04 Xe-138 8.83E+03 4.13E+03 9. 21E+03 4.75E+03 Ar-41 8.84E+03 2.69E+03 9.30E+03 3.28E+03

The listed dose factors are for radionuclides that may be detected in gaseous effluents.

- 7.56E-02 = 7.56 x 10 .

The values listed above were taken from Table 8-1 of NRC Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1. The values were multiplied by 10 to convert picocuries'o microcuries'

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-2 DISTANCES (MILES) TO TYPICAL CONTROLLING LOCATIONS AS MEASURED FROM CENTER OF WNP-2 CONTAINMENT BUILDING*

Location Distance Sector Dose Pathwa s (miles)

Site Boundary 1.2 SE Air dose measurement One 4.2 ESE Ground, vegetables, and inhalation Two 6.4 SE Ground, meat, cow milk, and inhalation Three 4.8 SE Ground, vegetables, and inhalation Four 4.1 ENE Ground, vegetables, and inhalation Five 4.3 Ground and inhalation

Typical locations and pathways are based on the current Land Use Census (LUC).

63

Table 3-3 WNP-2 LONG-TERN AVERAGE DISPERSION (X/Q)

AND DEPOSITION D VALUES FOR TYPICAL LOCATIONS X/Q X/Q X/Q 2.3 Days 8.0 Days No Decay Decay Decay Location Sector Distance Point of Release No De letion No De letion ~oe 1eted (miles) (sec/m ) (sec/m ) (sec/m ) (m )

Site Boundary SE 1.2 Reactor Bldg. 2.7E-07 2.7E-07 2.6E-07 2.0E-09 Turbine Bldg. 1.4E-05 1.3E-05 1.2E-05 1.2E-08 Radwaste Bldg. 1.4E-05 1.3E-05 1.2E-05 1.2E-08 One ESE 4.2 Reactor Bldg. 1.5E-06 1.5E-06 1. 2E-06 6. OE-10 Turbine Bldg. 1.1E-06 1.0E-06 8.1E-07 6. OE-10 Radwaste Bld . 1.1E-06 1.0E-06 8.1E-07 6.0E-10 Two SE 6.4 Reactor Bldg. 3.7E-07 3.5E-07 3.4E-07 3. 2E-10 Turbine Bldg. 7.2E-07 6.8E-07 5.1E-07 2.6E-10 Radwaste Bld . 7.2E-07 6.8E-07 5.1E-07 2.6E-10 Three SE 4.8 Reactor Bldg. 5.7E-07 5.5E-07 5.5E-07 5.9E-10 Turbine Bldg. 1.1E-06 1.1E-06 8.3E-07 4.9E-10 Radwaste Bld . 1.1E-06 1.1E-06 8.3E-07 4. 9E-10 Four ENE 4.1 Reactor Bldg. 9.8E-07 9.3E-07 7.7E-07 3.8E-10 Turbine Bldg. 6.9E-07 6.5E-07 5.2E-07 3. 7E-10 Radwaste Bld . 6.9E-07 6.5E-07 5.2E-07 3.7E-10 Five NE 4.3 Reactor Bldg. 6.8E-08 6.6E-08 6.6E-08 1.3E-10 Turbine Bldg. 6.7E-07 6.3E-07 5.0E-07 3.7E-10 Radwaste Bldg. 6.7E-07 6.3E-07 5.0E-07 3. 7E-10

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-4 DOSE RATE PARAMETERS IMPLEMENTATION OF 10 CFR 20 AIRBORNE RELEASES Child Dose Factor* PI 1

DFA; DFG; Inhalation Nucl ide mrem Ci Ci m ~Ci m

~%sec'.8E-09 H-3 1.7E-07 0.0 6.3E+02 Na-24 1.3E-05 4.4E-06 2.9E-08 1. 6E+04 Cr-51 2.9E-07 4.6E-06 2.6E-10 1.7E+04 Hn-54 2.6E-08 4.3E-04 6.8E-09 1.6E+06 Hn-56 7.5E-05 3.3E-05 1.3E-08 1.2E+05 Fe-55 8.5E-09 3.0E-05 0.0 1. 1E+05 Fe-59 1.8E-07 3.4E-04 9.4E-09 1.3E+06 Co-58 1.1E-07 3.0E-04 8.2E-09 1.1E+06 Co-60 4.2E-09 1.9E-03 2.0E-08 7.0E+06 CU-64 1.5E-05 9.9E-06 1.7E-09 3.7E+04 Zn-65 3.3E-08 2.7E-04 4.6E-09 1.0E+06 Zn-69m 1.4E-05 2.7E-05 3.4E-09 1.0E+05 As-76 7.3E-06 1.9E-05 1.7E-07 7.0E+04 Br-82 5.5E-06 5.7E-06 2.2E-08 2. 1E+04 Sr-89 1.5E-07 5.8E-04 6. 5E-13 2. 2E+06 Sr-90 7.9E-10 1.0E-02 2. 6E-12** 3.7E+07 Zr-95 1.2E-07 6.0E-04 5.8E-09 2.2E+06 Nb-95 2.3E-07 1.7E-04 6.0E-09 6.3E+05 Zr-97 1.1E-05 9.5E-05 6.4E-09 3.5E+05 Nb-97 1.6E-04 7.5E-06 5.4E-09 2.8E+04 Ho-99'c-99m 2.9E-06 3.7E-05 2.2E-09 1.4E+05 3.2E-05 1.3E-06 1.1E-09 4.8E+03 RU-106 2.2E-08 3.9E-03 1.8E-09 1.4E+07 Ag-110m 3.2E-08 1.5E-03 2.1E-08 5.6E+06 Sb-124 1.3E-07 8.8E-04 1.5E-08 3.3E+06 Sb-125 7.9E-09 6.3E-04 3.5E-09 2.3E+06 Sb-126 6.5E-07 2.9E-04 1.0E-08 1. 1E+06 Sb-127 2.1E-06 6.2E-05 6.6E-09 2.3E+05 Te-127 2.1E-05 1.5E-05 1.1E-11 5.6E+04 Te-131m 6.4E-06 8.3E-05 9.9E-09 3. 1E+05 I-131 1.0E-06 4.4E-03 3.4E-09 1. 6E+07 I-132 8.4E-05 5.2E-05 2.0E-08 1. 9E+05 I-133 9.2E-06 1.0E-03 4.5E-09 3.7E+06 I-135 2.9E-05 2.1E-04 1.4E-08 7.8E+05 Cs-134 1.1E-08 2.7E-04 1.4E-08 1.0E+06 65

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-4 DOSE RATE PARAMETERS IMPLEMENTATION OF 10 CFR 20 AIRBORNE RELEASES Child Dose Factor* pI 1

DFG; Inhalation Nucl ide

~%sec'FA; mrem Ci emcee hc Ci m ~~Ci m Cs-137 7.3E-10 2.5E-04 4.9E-09 9.3E+05 Cs-138 3.6E-04 2.3E-07 2.4E-08 8.5E+02 Ba-140 6.3E-07 4.7E-04 2.4E-09 1.7E+06 La-140 4.8E-06 6.1E-05 1.7E-08 2.3E+05 Ce-141 2.4E-07 1.5E-04 6.2E-10 5.6E+05 Ce-144 2.8E-08 3.2E-03 3.7E-10 1.2E+07 Nd-147 7.2E-07 8.9E-05 1.2E-09 3.3E+05 Hf-179m 3.7E-02'.8E-07 2.0E-05 NO DATA 7.4E+04 Hf-181 6.0E-05 1.2E-08 2.2E+05 M-185 1.1E-07 1.9E-04 0.0 7.0E+05 Np-239 3.4E-06 1.7E-05 9.5E-10 6.4E+04

Maximum

~

Organ

- No data is listed for 4r-90 in Table

~

E-6 of Regulatory Guide 1.109, Revision 1. Y-90 values were used for dose conversion factor Sr-90.

66

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-5a DOSE PARAMETERS FOR 10 CFR 50 EVALUATIONS, AIRBORNE RELEASES AGE GROUP: ADULT ORGAN OF

REFERENCE:

MAXIMUM ORGAN R(I), INDIVIDUAL PATHWAY DOSE PARAMETERS FOR RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES RADIO" INHALATION GROUND PLANE COW-HILK GOAT-MILK ANIHAL-HEAT VEGETABLES NUCLIDE (HREH/YR (M2.HREH/YR (H2.HREM/YR (H2.HREM/YR (H2.MREH/YR (H2.HREH/YR PER pCI/H3) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER UCI/SEC H 3 7.2E+02 O.OE-01 S.BE+02 1.2E+03 2.4E+02 1.6E+03 NA 24 1.0E+04 1.2E+07 1.2E+06 2.2E+05 7.2E"04 1. IE+05 CR 51 1.4E+04 4.7E+06 3.3E+06 5.9E+05 8.2E+05 2.3E+07 MN 54 1.4E+06 1.4E+09 1.4E+07 2.1E+06 I.SE+07 9.4E+08 MN 56 2.DE+04 9.DE+05 6.2E-02 1. 1E-02 O.OE-OI 2.DE+02 FE 55 7.2E+04 O.OE-OI 1.4E+07 2.2E+06 1.6E+08 1.9E+08 FE 59 I.DE+06 2.7E+08 1. IE+08 2.DE+07 9.BE+08 I.SE+09 CO 58 9.3E+05 3.BE+08 4.7E+07 7.BE+06 1.BE+08 B.DE+08 CO 60 6.DE+06 2.3E+10 1.7E+08 2.5E+07 B.DE+08 2.9E+09 CU 64 4.9E+04 6. IE+05 I.DE+06 1.7E+05 1.1E-OS 3.3E+05 ZN 65 8.6E+05 7.5E+08 2.7E+09 4.DE+08 7.DE+08 1.3E+09 ZN 69H 1.4E+05 1.3E+06 1.3E+07 2.4E+06 1.2E-03 1.4E+06 AS 76 I.SE+05 3.BE+06 2. IE+07 3.BE+06 2.9E+01 B.DE+06 BR 82 1.4E+04 2.1E+07 1.9E+07 3.4E+06 7.DE+02 7.7E+05 SR 89 1.4E+06 2.2E+04 6.BE+08 2.DE+09 1.4E+08 1.5E+10 SR 90 2.9E+07 6.7E+06 3.4E+10 8.3E+10 8.9E+09 7.4E+11 ZR 95 1.BE+06 2.5E+08 4.6E+05 7.6E+04 9.2E+08 1.6E+09 NB 95 S. IE+05 1.4E+08 1.3E+08 2.2E+07 3.6E+09 8.4E+08 ZR 97 5.2E+05 3.DE+06 1.4E+04 2.4E+03 6.4E-OI 8.BE+06 NB 97 2.4E+03 I.BE+05 1.6E-09 2.9E-IO O.OE-01 B.IE-04 HO 99 2.5E+05 4.DE+06 2.9E+07 5.2E+06 1.2E+05 9.3E+06 TC 99H 4.2E+03 1.BE+05 2.BE+03 S.DE+02 3.6E-IB 2.2E+03 RU106 9.4E+06 4.2E+08 7.3E+05 I. IE+05 I.DE+11 1.2E+10 AGI IOH 4.6E+06 3.5E+09 1. 2E+10 I.BE+09 1.4E+09 4.4E+09 58124 2.5E+06 6.DE+08 3.5E+08 5.BE+07 2.7E+08 4.DE+09 SB125 1.7E+06 2.4E+09 1.3E+08 I.BE+07 1.2E+08 1.4E+09 SB126 7.7E+05 8.4E+07 2.2E+08 4.DE+07 7.6E+07 1.6E+09

'SB127 3.DE+05 1.7E+07 5.2E+07 9.3E+06 1.9E+06 1.2E+08 TE127 5.7E+04 3.DE+03 2.6E+04 4.7E+03 8.4E-09 2.DE+05 TE131M 5.6E+05 B.DE+06 8.9E+06 1.6E+06 1. IE+04 2.DE+07 I 131 1.2E+07 8.6E+06 3.4E+10 6. IE+10 1.2E+09 4. 4E+10 I 132 1. IE+05 6.2E+05 3.9E+00 6.9E+00 O.OE-01 1. 1E+03 I 133 2.2E+06 1.2E+06 2.5E+08 4.5E+08 2.4E+01 1. IE+08 I 135 4.5E+05 1.3E+06 5.5E+05 9.BE+05 1. 7E-15 1.4E+06 CS134 8.5E+05 6.9E+09 7.4E+09 2. 7E+10 8.6E+08 I.DE+10 CS136 1.5E+05 I.SE+08 5.DE+08 2.2E+09 2.3E+07 4.6E+08 CS137 6.2E+05 1.3E+10 6.DE+09 2. IE+10 7. 1E+08 8.6E+09 CS138 6.2E+02 3.6E+05 1.0E-23 4.6E-23 O.OE-OO 3.0E-II BA140 1.3E+06 2.1E+07 2.7E+07 4.BE+06 2.BE+07 7.3E+08 LA140 4.6E+05 1.9E+07 8.4E+04 I.SE+04 7.DE+02 3.3E+07 CE141 3.6E+05 1.4E+07 S.BE+06 I.DE+06 1.7E+07 9.3E+08 CE144 7.BE+06 7.DE+07 6.4E+07 9.6E+06 2.6E+08 I.IE+10 ND147 2.2E+05 B.SE+06 2.5E+05 4.6E+04 1.9E+07 5. IE+08 HF 179M 1.6E+05 O.OE-01 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI O.OE-OI O.OE-OI HF181 4.BE+05 2. IE+08 5.5E+05 9.3E+04 1.2E+10 1.BE+09 W 185 4.5E+05 I.BE+04 2.4E+07 3.9E+06 1.9E+07 8.4E+08 NP239 1.2E+05 1.7E+06 3.7E+04 6.7E+03 2.6E+03 1.6E+07 NOTE: The Y-90 ground plane dose factor was used for Sr-90.

The PARTS subroutine of GASPAR Il was used to produce this table.

67

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-Sb DOSE PARAMETERS FOR 10 CFR 50 EVALUATIONS, AIRBORNE RELEASES AGE GROUP: TEEN ORGAN OF REFERENCE'AXIMUM ORGAN R(I), INDIVIDUAL PATHWAY DOSE PARAMETERS FOR RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES RADIO" INHALATION GROUND PLANE COM-MILK GOAT-HILK ANIHAL-MEAT VEGETABLES NUCLIDE (NREM/YR (M2.MREH/YR (M2.MREH/YR (H2.HREH/YR (M2.MREH/YR (MZ.HREH/YR PER pCI/H3) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC H 3 7.3E+02 O.OE-DI 7.5E+02 1.5E+03 1.5E+02 1.9E+03 NA 24 1.4E+04 1.2E+07 2. IE+06 3.9E+05 S.BE-04 1.DE+05 CR 51 2.1E+04 4.7E+06 3.9E+06 6.BE+05 4.4E+05 2.5E+07 HN 54 2.DE+06 1.4E+09 1.6E+07 2.3E+06 7.BE+06 9.6E+08 HN 56 5.7E+04 9.DE+05 2.3E-01 4.1E-02 O.OE-OO 3.7E+02 FE 55 1.2E+05 O.OE-01 2.4E+07 3.BE+06 1.3E+08 3.DE+08 FE 59 1.5E+06 2.7E+08 1.3E+08 2.5E+07 5.5E+08 1.7E+09 CO 58 1.3E+06 3.BE+08 5.3E+07 8.7E+06 9.4E+07 8.3E+08 CO 60 8.7E+06 2.3E+10 2.1E+08 3.DE+07 4.3E+08 3. IE+09 CU 64 6. 1E+04 6.1E+05 1.6E+06 2.7E+05 B.OE-06 2.7E+05 ZN 65 1.2E+06 7.5E+08 4.5E+09 6.7E+08 5.4E+08 2.DE+09 ZN 69M 1.7E+05 1.3E+06 2. IE+07 3.BE+06 9.1E-04 I. IE+06 AS 76 1.5E+05 3.BE+06 2.7E+07 4.9E+06 1. 7E+01 5.3E+06 BR 82 1.BE+04 2. IE+07 2.BE+07 5. IE+06 4.9E+02 6. IE+05 SR 89 2.4E+06 2.2E+04 1.3E+09 3.7E+09 1.2E+08 2. 4E+10 SR 90 3.3E+07 6.7E+06 5. IE+10 1.3E+11 6.2E+09 1. DE+12 ZR 95 2.7E+06 2.5E+08 5.BE+05 9.5E+04 5.3E+08 1.BE+09 NB 95 7.5E+05 1.4E+08 1.6E+08 2.7E+07 2.DE+09 9. IE+08 ZR 97 6.3E+05 3.DE+06 2.1E+04 3.BE+03 4.6E-01 7.DE+06 NB 97 3.9E+03 I.BE+05 1.9E"08 3.3E-09 O.OE-OI 4.8E-03 HO 99 2.7E+05 4.DE+06 5.1E+07 9.2E+06 9.4E+04 1.1E+07 TC 99H 6. IE+03 I.BE+05 5.3E+03 9.5E+02 3.2E-IB 2. I E+03 RU106 1.6E+07 4.2E+08 9.9E+05 1.5E+05 6.2E+10 1.5E+10 AG110H 6.BE+06 3.5E+09 1.4E+10 2. 1E+09 7.6E+08 4.6E+09 58124 3.BE+06 6.DE+08 4.5E+08 7.3E+07 1.6E+08 4.6E+09 58125 2.7E+06 2.4E+09 1.6E+08 2.3E+07 6.BE+07 1.6E+09 58126 1.2E+06 8.4E+07 2.BE+08 5. IE+07 4.5E+07 I.BE+09 58127 3.2E+05 1.7E+07 6.9E+07 1.2E+07 1.2E+06 1.2E+08 TE127 8. IE+04 3.DE+03 4.BE+04 8.6E+03 7.0E-09 1.BE+05 TE131H 6.2E+05 B.DE+06 1.3E+07 2.3E+06 7.4E+03 1.5E+07 I. 131 1.5E+07 8.6E+06 5.4E+10 9.7E+10 9.DE+08 6.1E+10 I 132 1.5E+05 6.2E+05 6.4E+00 1.2E+01 O.OE-OO 9.3E+02 I 133 2.9E+06 1.2E+06 4.2E+08 7.5E+08 1.BE+01 9.6E+07 I 135 6.2E+05 1.3E+06 9.3E+05 1.7E+06 1.3E-15 1.2E+06 CS134 1. IE+06 6.9E+09 1.3E+10 4.6E+10 6.BE+08 1.6E+10 CS136 1.9E+05 1.5E+08 8.4E+08 3.BE+09 I.BE+07 7.DE+08 CS137 8.5E+05 1.3E+10 1.1E+10 3.BE+10 5.7E+08 1. 4E+10 CS138 8.6E+02 3.6E+05 I.BE-23 8. IE-23 O.OE-OO 2.7E-II BA140 2.DE+06 2.1E+07 3.6E+07 6.4E+06 1.BE+07 B.BE+08 LA140 4.9E+05 1.9E+07 1. IE+05 2.1E+04 4.4E+02 2.4E+07 CE141 6. IE+05 1.4E+07 7.9E+06 1.4E+06 1.DE+07 I.IE+09 CE144 1.3E+07 7.DE+07 B.BE+07 1.3E+07 1.6E+08 1.3E+10 ND147 3.7E+05 8.5E+06 3.5E+05 6.2E+04 1.2E+07 6.1E+08 HF179H 7.1E+04 O.OE-DI O.OE-OI O.OE-OI D.OE-OI O.OE-OI HF181 4.BE+05 2. IE+08 7.1E+05 1.2E+05 7.DE+09 2. IE+09 M 185 7.7E+05 I.BE+04 3.3E+07 5.4E+06 1.2E+07 I'.DE+09 NP239 1.3E+05 1.7E+06 5.3E+04 9.6E+03 1.7E+03 1.4E+07 NOTE: The Y-90 ground plane dose factor was used for Sr-90.

The PARTS subroutine of GASPAR II was used to produce this table.

68

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-5c DOSE PARAMETERS FOR 10 CFR 50 EVALUATIONS, AIRBORNE RELEASES AGE GROUP: CHILD ORGAN OF REFERENCE'AXIMUM ORGAN R(I), INDIVIDUAL PATHWAY DOSE PARAMETERS FOR RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES RADIO- INHALATION GROUND PLANE COW%ILK GOAT-HILK ANIMAL-MEAT VEGETABLES NUCLIDE (HREH/YR (HZ.HREH/YR (HZ.NREM/YR (H2.HREH/YR (M2.MREM/YR (M2.HREM/YR PER pCI/M3) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC M 3 6.4E+02 O.OE-01 1. 2E+03 2.4E+03 I.BE+02 2.9E+03 HA 24 1.6E+04 1.2E+07 4.5E+06 B.DE+05 9.2E-04 1.6E+05 CR 51 1.7E+04 4.7E+06 2.5E+06 4.4E+05 2.2E+05 1.6E+07 HN 54 1.6E+06 1.4E+09 1. 1E+07 1.7E+06 4.3E+06 6.9E+08 HN 56 1.2E+05 9.DE+05 B.BE-01 1.6E-01 O.OE-OO 1. 1E+03 FE 55 1.1E+05 O.OE-01 6. IE+07 9.6E+06 2.5E+08 7.6E+08 FE 59 1.3E+06 2.7E+08 9.5E+07 1.7E+07 3.DE+08 1.2E+09 CO 58 1. 1E+06 3.BE+08 3.4E+07 5.6E+06 4.7E+07 5.3E+08 CO 60 7.1E+06 2.3E+10 1.4E+08 2.DE+07 2.2E+08 2. IE+09 CU 64 3.7E+04 6. IE+05 1.7E+06 2.9E+05 6.5E-06 2.2E+05 ZN 65 1.DE+06 7.5E+08 6.BE+09 I.DE+09 6.2E+08 3.DE+09 ZH 69H 1.DE+05 1.3E+06 2.2E+07 4.DE+06 7.2E-04 9.DE+05 AS 76 7.DE+04 3.BE+06 2.2E+07 4.DE+06 1.1E+01 3.3E+06 BR 82 2. 1E+04 2.1E+07 5.BE+07 1.DE+07 7.6E+02 9.5E+05 SR 89 2.2E+06 2.2E+04 3.1E+09 S.2E+09 2.3E+08 6.DE+10 SR 90 3.BE+07 6.7E+06 1.DE+11 2.6E+11 9.BE+09 2. IE+12 ZR 95 Z.ZE+06 2.5E+08 4.2E+05 7.DE+04 3.DE+08 1.3E+09 HB 95 6. 1E+05 1.4E+08 1.1E+08 1.BE+07 I.DE+09 6.2E+08 ZR 97 3.5E+05 3.DE+06 2.1E+04 3.BE+03 3.5E"01 5.2E+06 NB 97 2.BE+04 1.BE+05 4.2E-07 7.6E-OB O.OE-DI 8.2E-02 HO 99 1.3E+05 4.DE+06 8.7E+07 1.6E+07 1.2E+05 1.6E+07 TC 99H 4.BE+03 1.BE+05 7.4E+03 1.3E+03 3.4E-IB 2.2E+03 RU106 1.4E+07 4.2E+08 7.9E+05 1.2E+05 3.BE+10 1. 2E+10 AG110H 5.5E+06 3.5E+09 9.4E+09 1.4E+09 3.BE+08 3.DE+09 58124 3.2E+06 6.DE+08 3.3E+08 5.4E+07 B.BE+07 3.3E+09 58125 2.3E+06 2.4E+09 1.2E+08 1.7E+07 3.BE+07 1.2E+09 SB126 1. 1E+06 8.4E+07 2.2E+08 4.DE+07 2.7E+07 1.4E+09 58127 2.3E+05 1.7E+07 5.5E+07 1.DE+07 7.2E+05 9.2E+07 TE127 5.6E+04 3.DE+03 5.9E+04 1. 1E+04 6.7E-09 1.7E+05 TE131H 3. IE+05 B.DE+06 1.1E+07 2. 1E+06 5.DE+03 9.9E+06 I 131 1. 6E+07 8.6E+06 1.1E+11 1.9E+ll 1.4E+09 1.2E+11 I 132 1.9E+05 6.2E+05 1.5E+01 2.7E+01 D.OE-OO 1.6E+03 I 133 3.BE+06 1.2E+06 9.9E+08 1.BE+09 3.3E+01 1.7E+08 I 135 7.9E+05 1.3E+06 2. IE+06 3.BE+06 2.3E-15 2. IE+06 CS134 1.DE+06 6.9E+09 2. DE+10 '.5E+10 8.3E+08 2.6E+10 CS136 1.7E+05 1.5E+08 1.3E+09 6.DE+09 2. IE+07 I.IE+09 CS137 9. 1E+05 1.3E+10 1.9E+10 6.BE+10 7.9E+08 2.5E+10 CS138 8.4E+02 3.6E+05 3.2E-23 1.4E-ZZ O.OE-OO 3.6E-11 BA140 1.7E+06 2. 1E+07 5.6E+07 1.DE+07 2.1E+07 1.4E+09 LA140 2.3E+05 1.9E+07 9.5E+04 1.7E+04 2.BE+02 1.6E+07 CE141 5.4E+05 1.4E+07 6.3E+06 1.1E+06 6.4E+06 9.0E+08 CE144 1.2E+07 7.DE+07 7.DE+07 1.1E+07 1.DE+08 1.1E+10 ND147 3.3E+05 8.5E+06 2.BE+05 S.DE+04 7.4E+06 4.BE+08 KF179H 7.4E+04 O.OE-01 O.OE-OI O.OE-01 O.OE-OI D.OE-OI MF181 2.2E+05 2. 1E+08 5.9E+05 9.9E+04 4.4E+09 1.BE+09 W 185 6.9E+05 1.BE+04 2.7E+07 4.3E+06 7.3E+06 8.3E+08 HP239 6.4E+04 1.7E+06 4.6E+04 8.3E+03 1.1E+03 I.DE+07 NOTE: The Y-SO ground plane dose factor was used for Sr-90.

The PARTS subroutine of GASPAR II was used to produce this table.

69

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-5d DOSE PARAMETERS FOR 10 CFR 50 EVALUATIONS, AIRBORNE RELEASES AGE GROUP: INFANT ORGAN OF

REFERENCE:

MAXIMUM ORGAN R(I), INDIVIDUAL PATHWAY DOSE PARAMETERS FOR RADIONUCLIDES OTHER THAN NOBLE GASES RADIO- INHALATION GROUND PLANE COM-HILK GOAT-HILK ANIHAL-HEAT VEGETABLES NUCLIDE (HREH/YR (M2.HREH/YR (H2.HREH/YR (MZ.HREH/YR (M2.HREH/YR (H2.HREH/YR PER pCI/H3) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC) PER pCI/SEC H 3 3.7E+02 O.OE-01 1.BE+03 3.7E+03 D.DE-01 O.OE-DI NA 24 1.1E+04 1.2E+07 7.BE+06 1.4E+06 D.DE-DI O.OE-OI CR 51 1.3E+04 4.7E+06 2.2E+06 3.BE+05 O.OE-01 O.OE-OI HN 54 I.DE+06 1.4E+09 2. IE+07 3. IE+06 O.OE-Ol O.OE-OI MN 56 7.2E+04 9.DE+05 1.3E+00 2.4E-DI O.OE-01 O.OE-OI FE 55 8.7E+04 O.OE-DI 7.4E+07 1.2E+07 O.OE-Ol O.OE"01 FE 59 1.DE+06 2.7E+08 I.BE+08 3.4E+07 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI CO 58 7.BE+05 3.BE+08 2.9E+07 4.BE+06 O.OE-OI D.OE-OI CO 60 4.5E+06 2.3E+10 1.2E+08 1.7E+07 O.OE"01 O.OE-OI CU 64 1.5E+D4 6.1E+05 1.9E+06 3.2E+05 O.OE-OI D.OE-OI ZN 65 6.5E+05 7.5E+08 1.2E+10 1.7E+09 O.OE-OI O.OE-01 ZN 69H 4.IEt04 1.3E+06 2.4E+07 4.3E+06 O.OE-01 O.OE-DI AS 76 2.7E+04 3.BE+06 2.2E+07 4.DE+06 O.OE"01 O.OE-OI BR 82 1.3E+04 2. IE+07 9.BE+07 I.BE+07 O.OE-OI O.OE-DI SR 89 2.DE+06 2.2E+04 6.DE+09 I.BE+10 O.OE"01 O.OE-OI SR 90 1.6E+07 6.7E+06 1.2E+11 2.9E+11 O.OE-DI D.OE-DI ZR 95 I.BE+06 2.5E+08 4.DE+05 6.5E+04 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI NB 95 4.BE+05 1.4E+08 9.6E+07 1.7E+07 D.DE-OI O.DE-OI ZR 97 1.4E+05 3.DE+06 2.2E+04 4.DE+03 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI NB 97 2.7E+04 I.BE+05 1.1E-06 1.9E-07 O.OE"01 O.OE-OI HO 99 1.3E+05 4.DE+06 1.6E+08 2.BE+07 O.OE-DI O.OE-OI TC 99H 2.DE+03 I.BE+05 8.2E+03 1.5E+03 O.OE-01 O.OE-OI RU106 1.2E+07 4.2E+08 B.DE+05 1.2E+05 O.OE-01 O.OE-01 AG110H 3.7E+06 3.5E+09 8.2E+09 1.2E+09 O.OE-OI O.OE-01 58124 2.BE+06 6.DE+08 3. IE+08 5.1E+07 O.OE-DI O.OE-OI 58125 1:6E+06 2.4E+09 1.1E+08 1.6E+07 O.OE-01 O.OE-01 SB126 9.6E+05 8.4E+07 2. 1E+08 3.7E+07 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI 58127 2.2E+05 1.7E+07 5.5E+07 9.9E+06 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI TE127 2.4E+04 3.DE+03 6.BE+04 1.2E+04 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI TE131H 2.DE+05 B.DE+06 1.2E+07 2. IE+06 D.OE-DI O.OE-OI I 131 1.5E+07 8.6E+06 2. 6E+11 4.7E+11 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI I 132 1.7E+05 6.2E+05 3.4E+01 6.1E+01 O.OE-DI O.OE-OI I 133 3.6E+06 1.2E+06 2.4E+09 4.3E+09 O.OE-OI O.OE-01 I 135 7.DE+05 1.3E+06 4.9E+06 8.9E+06 O.OE-01 O.OE-DI CS134 7.DE+05 6.9E+09 3.7E+10 1.4E+11 O.OE-OI O.OE-DI CS136 1.3E+05 1.5E+08 2.BE+09 1. 2E+10 D.OE-DI D.DE-OI CS137 6. IE+05 1.3E+10 3.6E+10 1. 3E+I 1 O.OE"01 O.OE-OI CS138 B.BE+02 3.6E+05 1.2E-22 5.6E-22 O.OE-01 O.OE-01 BA140 1.6E+06 2. IE+07 1.2E+08 2. IE+07 O.OE-OI O.OE-01 LA140 1.7E+05 1.9E+07 9.4E+04 1.7E+04 O.OE-OI O.OE-01 CE141 5.2E+05 1. 4E+07 6.4E+06 1. IE+06 O.OE-01 O.OE-OI CE144 9.BE+06 7.DE+07 7. 1E+07 1. IE+07 O.OE-01 O.OE-01 N0147 3.2E+05 8.5E+06 2.BE+05 5.DE+04 O.OE"01 O.OE-DI HF179H 2.BE+04 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI O.OE-OI O.OE-01 D.OE-01 HF181 8.4E+04 2. IE+08 5.9E+05 9.9E+04 O.OE-DI O.OE-01 M 185 6.3E+05 I.BE+04 2.7E+07 4.4E+06 O.OE-OI O.OE-OI NP239 6.DE+04 1.7E+06 4.7E+04 B.SE+03 O.OE-DI O.OE-OI NOTE: The Y-90 ground plane dose factor was used for Sr-90.

The PARTS subroutine of GASPAR II was used to produce this table.

70

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-6 INPUT PARAMETERS FOR CALCULATING R; Parameter Value Table*

r (dimensionless) 1.0 for radioiodine E-15 0.2 for particulates E-15 F (days/liter) Each stable element E-1 U., (liters/yr) --Infant 330 E-5

--Child 330 E-5

--Teen 400 E-5

--Adult 310 E-5 (DFL;). (mrem/pCi) Each radionuclide E-11 to E-14 Y, (kg/m') 0.7 E-15 Y, (kg/m') 2.0 E-15 t, (seconds) 1.73 x 10'2 days) E-15 t (seconds) 7.78 x 10'90 days) E-15 gF (kg/day) 50 for cow E-3 6 for goat E-3 fs (dimensionless) 1.0 NUREG-0133 fp (dimensionl ess) 0.5 for cow Site specific 0.75 for goat Site specific.

Of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1 unless stated otherwise.

71

AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-7 INPUT PARAHETERS FOR CALCULATING R; Parameter Value Table*

r (dimensionless) 1.0 for radioiodine E-15 0.2 for particulates E-15 F, (days/kg) Each stable element E-1 U (kg/yr) -- Infant 0 E-5

--Child 41 E-5

--Teen 65 E-5

--Adult 110 E-5 (DFL;), (mrem/pCi) Each radionuclide E-11 to E-14 Yp (kg/m') 0.7 E-15 Y, (kg/m') 2.0 E-15 t, (seconds) 1.73 x 10'20 days) E-15 t (seconds) 7.78 x 10 (90 days) E-15

~F (kg/day) 50 E-3

Of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1.

72

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 Table 3-8 INPUT PARAMETERS FOR CALCULATING R.

1 Parameter Value Table*

r (dimensionless) 1.0 for radioiodine E-1 0.2 for particulates E-1 (DFL;) (mrem/pCi) Each radionuclide E-11 to E-14 u"

a (kg/yr)--Infant E-5

--Child 26 E-5

--Teen 42 E-5

--Adult 64 E-5 U'

'kg/yr) --Infant E-5

--Child 520 E-5

--Teen 630 E-5

--Adult 520 E-5 f (dimensionless) 0.42 Ref 2**

f, (dimensionless) 0.76 E-15 t (seconds) 8.6 x 10" (1 day) E-15 t (seconds) 5.18 x 10'60 days) E-15 Y(kg/m') 2.0 E-15

Of Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1.

- Refer to Table 3-14.

73

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-9 INPUT PARAMETERS NEEDED FOR CALCULATING DOSE SUMMARIES TO THE MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL AND THE POPULATION WITHIN 50 MILES FROM WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENT In ut Parameter Value Reference*

Distance to Maine (miles) 3000 Ref 1 Fraction of year leafy vegetables are grown 0.42 Ref 2 Fraction of year cows are on pasture 0.5 Ref 2 Fraction of crop from garden 0.76 Ref 3 Fraction of daily intake of cows derived from pasture while on pasture 1.0 Ref 2 Annual average relative humidity (%) 53.8 Ref 4 Annual average temperature (F') 53.0 Ref 5 Fraction of year goats are on pasture 0.75 Ref 2 Fraction of daily intake of goats derived from pasture while on pasture 1.0 Ref 2 Fraction of year beef cattle are on pasture 0.5 Ref 2 Fraction of daily intake of beef cattle derived from pasture while on pasture 1.0 Ref 2 Population within 50 miles of plant by direction and radii interval in miles. 252,356 Ref 6 Annual 50-mile milk production (liters/yr) 2.8E+08 Refs 7 L 9 Annual 50-mile meat production (kg/yr) 2.3E+07 Refs 7 E 9 Annual 50-mile vegetable production (kg/yr) 3.5E+09 Refs 7 L9 Source terms Ref 8 74

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-9 (contd.)

In ut Parameter Value Reference*

X/g values by sector for each dis-tance )recirculation, no decay) See Tables 3-11 (sec/m ) through 3-12 Ref 10 X/g values by sector for each dis-tance (recirculation, 2.26 days See Tables 3-11 decay, undepleted) (sec/m') through 3-12 Ref 10 X/g values by sector for each dis-tance (recirculation, 8.0 days See Table 3-11 decay, depleted) (sec/m') through 3-12 Ref 10 D/g values by sector for each dis- See Table 3-11 tance (1/m') through 3-12 Ref 10

References are listed in Table 3-14.

75

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-10 REACTOR BUILDING STACK X/Q AND D/Q VALUES A) NO DECAY, UNDEPLETED CHI/Q (SEC/METER CUBED) FOR EACH SEGMENT SEGMENT BOUNDARIES IN MILES FROM THE SITE DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROM SITE 5 3.899E-07 1.486E-07 6. 171E-08 3.982E-OB 3.093E-OB 2.000E-OB 2.118E-07 1.769E-07 1.196E-07 8.944E-OB SSW 2.557E-07 9.471E-OB 3.914E-OB 2.553E-OB 2.000E-OB 1.411E-OB 1.702E-07 1.431E-07 9.698E-OB 7.264E-OB SW 1.635E-07 6.378E-OB 3.299E-OB 2.517E-OB 1.999E-OB 3.647E-OB 1.045E-07 7.704E-OB 5.209E-OB 3.894E-OB WSW 6.676E-OB 2.927E-OB 1.506E-OB 1.122E-OB 8.872E-09 1.668E-OB 5.532E-OB 4. 156E-08 2.808E-OB 2.098E-OB W 6.58BE-OB 2.996E-OB 1.509E-OB 1.090E"08 8.368E-09 4.928E-09 2.837E-OB 2.330E-OB 1.569E-OB 1. 170E-08 WNW 1.279E-07 5.746E-OB 3.018E-OB 2.258E-OB 1.781E-OB 1.324E-OB 5.160E-OB 4.103E-OB 2.750E-OB 2.044E-OB NW 2.294E-07 8.625E-OB 3.624E-OB 2.423E-OB 1.934E"08 1.543E-OB 9.519E-OB 7.785E-OB 5.228E-OB 3.891E-OB NNW 5. 137E-07 1.770E-07 6.982E-OB 4.507E-OB 4.224E"08 2.976E-OB 1.801E-07 1.479E-07 9.945E-OB 7.407E-OB N 6.024E-07 2.016E-07 8.063E-OB 5.264E-OB 4.120E-OB 2.146E-07 2.652E-07 1.430E-07 9.579E-OB 7.115E-OB HHE 4.988E-07 1.690E-07 6.861E-OB 4.526E-OB 4.339E-OB 2.904E-07 1.966E-07 1.057E-07 7.066E-OB 5.243E-OB 3.347E-07 1. 195E-07 4.965E-OB 4.175E-OB 1.400E-07 3.198E-07 1.723E-07 9.247E-OB 6. 174E-08 4.576E-OB ENE 4.184E-07 3.067E-07 4.347E-07 9.267E-07 8.436E-07 4.052E-07 1.641E-07 8.817E-OB 5.893E-OB 4.371E-OB E 4.207E-07 3.460E-07 4.968E-07 1.027E-06 8.714E-07 4. 159E-07 1.669E-07 8.906E-OB 5.928E-OB 4.385E-OB ESE 6.224E-07 5.205E-07 7.813E-07 1.572E-06 1.364E-06 5.365E-07 2.045E-07 1.403E-07 9.350E-OB 6.922E-OB SE 5.045E-07 2.156E-07 1. 174E-07 3.944E-07 6.347E-07 3.083E-07 2.738E-07 1.923E-07 1.289E-07 9.576E-OB SSE 4.591E-07 1.855E-07 7.985E-OB 5.319E-OB 4.237E-OB 3.085E-OB 2.635E-07 2. 188E-07 1.475E-07 1. IOOE-07 76

ANfNDHfNT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-10 (CONTD)

B) 2.260 DAY DECAY, UNDEPLETED CHI/O (SEC/METER CUBED) FOR EACH SEGMENT SEGMENT BOUNDARIES IN MILES FROM THE SITE DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROM SITE S 3.887E-07 1.477E-07 6;094E-08 3.904E-OB 3.008E-OB 1.898E-OB 1.813E-07 1.424E-07 8.918E-OB 6.201E-OB SSW 2.550E-07 9.411E-OB 3.866E-OB 2.504E-OB 1.947E-OB 1.341E-OB 1.493E-07 1. 190E-D7 7.530E-OB 5.275E-OB SW 1.630E-07 6.338E-OB 3.255E-OB 2.463E-OB 1.939E-OB 3.438E-OB 9. 132E-08 6.300E-OB 3.969E-OB 2.776E"08 WSW 6.657E-OB 2.909E-OB 1.484E-OB 1.093E-OB 8.533E-09 1.521E-OB 4.618E-OB 3.210E-OB 1.995E-OB 1.381E-OB W 6.563E-OB 2.972E-OB 1.488E-OB 1.069E-OB 8. 157E-09 4.721E-09 2.319E-OB 1.757E-OB 1.077E-OB 7.365E-09 WNW 1.275E-07 5.702E-OB 2.970E-OB 2.201E-OB 1.717E-OB 1.226E-OB 4.063E-OB 2.933E-OB 1.765E-OB 1. 194E-08 NW 2.287E-07 8.575E-OB 3.584E-OB 2.381E-OB 1.888E-OB 1.470E"08 8.026E-OB 6.139E"08 3.811E-OB 2.642E-OB NNW 5. 125E-07 1. 760E-07 6.913E-OB 4.439E-OB 4. 130E-08 2.853E-OB 1. 614E-07 1. 269E-07 8. 077E-08 5. 711E-08 N 6.011E-07 2.006E-07 7.988E-OB 5.189E-OB 4.040E" 08 2.000E" 07 2.381E-07 1.202E-07 7.574E-OB 5.313E-OB NNE 4.978E-07 1. 682E-07 6. 795E-08 4. 456E-08 4. 236E-08 2. 707E-07 1. 714E-07 8. 475E" 08 5. 256E-08 3. 639E-08 NE 3.339E-07 1.188E-07 4.909E-OB 4.089E-OB 1.348E-07 2.908E-07 1.447E-07 7.008E-OB 4.277E-OB 2.924E-OB ENE 4.172E-07 3.040E-07 4.272E-07 8.948E-07 7.996E-07 3.720E-07 1.390E-07 6.706E-OB 4. 134E-08 2.827E-OB E 4. 194E-07 3.430E-07 4.885E-07 9.909E-07 8.315E-07 3.861E-07 1.445E-07 7.067E-OB 4.346E-OB 2.986E-OB ESE 6.207E-07 5.158E"07 7.670E-07 1.523E-06 1.306E-06 5.046E-07 1.776E-07 1. 132E-07 7.012E-OB 4.846E-OB SE 5.030E-07 2.142E-07 1. 159E-07 3.850E-07 6. 171E-07 2.946E-07 2.383E-07 1.554E-07 9.668E-OB 6.701E-OB SSE 4.577E-07 1.843E-07 7.887E-OB 5.214E-OB 4.117E-OB 2.911E-OB 2.219E-07 1.724E-07 1.072E-07 7.416E-OB 77

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-10 (CONTD)

C) 8.000 DAY DECAY, UNDEPLETED CHI/O (SEC/HETER CUBED) FOR EACH SEGMENT SEGHENT BOUNDARIES IN HILES FROH THE SITE DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROH SITE 5 3. 793E-07 1. 434E-07 5.872E-OB 3. 765E-08 2.919E-OB 1.879E-OB 1.925E-07 1.497E-07 9.326E-OB 6. 496E-08 SSM 2.479E-07 9.089E-OB 3.705E-OB 2.403E-OB 1.880E-OB 1.325E-OB 1.561E-07 1.226E-07 7.691E-OB 5.388E-OB SM 1.572E-07 6.070E-OB 3.115E-OB 2.387E-OB 1.896E-OB 3.473E-OB 9.189E-OB 6.223E-OB 3.871E-OB 2.694E-OB WSW 6.375E-OB 2.776E-OB 1.416E-OB 1.057E-OB 8.356E-09 1.572E-OB 4.792E-OB 3.295E-OB 2.035E-OB 1.407E-OB W 6.471E-OB 2.914E-OB 1.449E-OB 1.047E-OB 8.037E-09 4.713E-09 2.534E "08 1.922E-OB 1.182E-OB 8.138E-09 MNW 1.255E-07 5. 587E-08 2.901E-OB 2. 171E-0& 1. 709E-08 1. 261E-08 4.452E-OB 3. 233E-08 1. 960E-08 1.335E-OB NW 2.228E-07 8.309E-OB 3.451E" 08 2.300E-OB 1.837E-OB 1.471E-OB 8.579E-OB 6.505E-OB 4.009E-OB 2.769E-OB NNW 4.947E-07 1.686E-07 6.558E-OB 4.219E-OB 3.996E-OB 2.820E-OB 1.654E-07 1.272E-07 7.938E-OB 5.547E-OB N 5.785E-07 1.917E-07 7.566E-OB 4.927E-OB 3.863E-OB 2.032E-07 2.372E-07 1. 154E-07 7.127E-OB 4.939E-OB NNE 4.769E-07 1.602E-07 6.423E-OB 4.232E-OB 4.105E-OB 2.728E-07 1.696E-07 8. 150E-08 4.985E-OB 3.425E-OB NE 3. 220E-07 1. 141E-07 4. 688E-08 3.977E-OB 1.366E-07 2.947E" 07 1. 433E-07 6.805E" 08 4. 121E-08 2. 806E-08 ENE 4.056E-07 2.988E-07 3.849E-07 7.340E-07 6.588E-07 2.951E-07 1.033E-07 4.759E-OB 2.806E-OB 1.864E-OB E 4.072E-07 3.375E-07 4.406E-07 8.152E-07 6.738E-07 3.000E-07 1.042E-07 4.785E-OB 2.822E-OB 1.877E-OB ESE 5.997E-07 5.068E-07 6.926E-07 1.240E-06 1.053E-06 3.916E-07 1.247E-07 7.545E-OB 4.463E"08 2.978E-OB SE 4.883E-07 2.075E-07 1.122E-07 3.874E-07 6. 185E-07 2.852E-07 2.217E-07 1.413E-07 8.648E-OB 5.940E-OB SSE 4.476E-07 1.796E-07 7.640E-OB 5.064E-OB 4.029E-OB 2.929E-OB 2. 179E-07 1.669E-07 1.027E-07 7.085E-OB 78

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-10 (CONTO)

D) REACTOR BUILDING 0/Q RELATIVE DEPOSITION PER UNIT AREA (H**-2) BY DOMNWIND SECTORS SEGHENT BOUNDARIES IN HILES DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROH SITE 5 4.044E-09 1.146E-09 3.717E-IO 1.874E-IO 1.127E-IO 4.635E-11 3.868E-11 2.283E-11 1.219E-11 7.548E-12 SSM 2.643E-09 7.296E-10 2.324E-10 1.165E" 10 7.000E-11 2.916E-11 2.663E-11 1.596E-II 8.526E-12 5.278E-12 SM 1. 429E" 09 4. 068E-10 1. 407E-10 6. 799f -1 1 4. 016E-11 3. 192E-I I 2.386E-I I 9. 555E-12 5. 104E-12 3. 160E-12 WSW 4. 407E-10 1.347E-IO 4.908E-11 2. 400E-11 1. 423E-11 1. 224E-11 9. 617E-12 3. 865E-12 2. 064E-12 1. 278E-12 M 5.587E-10 1. 780E-10 6. 665E-11 3. 253E-11 1.929E-11 7.707E-12 6. 116E-12 3. 617E-12 1. 932E-12 1. 196E-12 MNM 1. 110E-09 3. 459E-10 1. 262E-10 6. 186E-11 3. 674E-11 2.357E-11 1. 640E-11 6. 963E-12 3. 719E-12 2.302E-12 NW 2. 199E-09 6. 289E-10 2. 051E-10 1. 036E-10 6. 242E-11 2. 625E-11 2. 528E-11 1. 520E-11 8. 117E-12 5.025E-12 NNW 5.161E-09 1.411E-09 4.463E-IO 2.231E-10 1.382E-IO 5.828E-II 5.329E" 11 3.186E-I I 1.702E-11 1.053E-II N 7.312E-09 1.932E-09 6.001E-IO 2.970E-IO 1. 774E-10 1.307E-10 8.654E-11 3.430E-I I 1.832E-11 1. 134E-11 NNE 6. 688E"09 1. 751E-09 5. 437E-10 2. 675E-10 1. 637E-10 1. 566E-10 6. 754E-11 2.677E-11 4. 430E-11 8. 851E-12 NE 4. 654E-09 1. 223E-09 3.808E-IO 1. 931E-10 2. 225E-10 1. 592E-10 4. 683E-11 1.873E-11 1.000E-11 6.191E-12 ENE 4.842E-09 1.277E-09 6.137E-10 5.265E-10 3.056E-IO 1.189E-IO 3.440E-II 1.364E-II 7.286E-12 4.511E-12 E 4. 004E-09 1. 121E-09 6. 044E-10 5.617E-10 3. 268E-10 1. 248E-10 3. 590E-11 1.441E-11 7. 695E-12 4. 763E-12 ESE 6. 270E-09 1. 764E-09 9. 704E-10 9. 016E-10 5.207E-IO 2.008E-IO 5. 788E" 11 2.316E-I I 1. 237E-11 7. 659E-12 SE 5.027E-09 1.477E-09 5.218E-IO 5.481E-IO 6.894E-IO 2.662E-IO 7.839E-I 1 3.142E-I I 1.678E-l I 1.039E-I I SSE 4.426E-09 1.321E-09 4.452E-10 2.267E-10 1.366E-IO 5.692E-11 4.873E-11 2.896E" 11 1.547E-I I 9.573E-12 79

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-11 TURBINE OR RAOWASTE BUILDING X/Q AND 0/Q VALUES A) NO DECAY, UNDEPLETED CHI/Q (SEC/METER CUBED) FOR EACH SEGMENT SEGMENT BOUNDARIES IN MILES FROM THE SITE DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROM SITE 5 2.782E-OS 7.806E"06 2.832E-06 1.567E-06 1.037E-06 5.081E-07 2. 113E-07 1.153E-07 7.771E-OB 5.794E-OB SSW 2.117E-OS 6. OOOE-06 2. 195E-06 1. 220E-06 8. 099E-07 3.989E-07 1. 671E-07 9. 172E-08 6. 199E-08 4. 631E-08 SW 1.211E-05 3.404E-06 1.236E-06 6.834E-07 4.521E-07 2.214E-07 9.199E-OB 5.019E-OB 3.381E-OB 2.520E-OB WSW 6. 468E-06 1. 831E-06 6. 680E-07 3. 702E-07 2.451E-07 1. 202E-07 5. 001E-08 2. 729E-08 1. 837E-08 1. 369E-08

'W 4.034E-OG 1.113E-06 3.982E-07 2. 186E-07 1.439E-07 6.994E-OB 2.873E-OB 1.555E-OB 1.043E-OB 7.751E-09 WNW 7.812E-06 2. 127E-06 7.518E-07 4.096E-07 2.682E-07 1.292E-07 5.239E"08 2.809E-OB 1.873E-OB 1.387E-OB NW 1.386E-OS 3.830E-06 1.370E-06 7.517E"07 4.944E-07 2.397E-07 9.809E-OB 5.290E-OB 3.538E-OB 2.624E-OB NNW 2.549E-OS 7.081E-06 2.548E-06 1.402E-06 9.242E-07 4.498E-07 1.849E-07 1.001E-07 6.703E-OB 4.976E-OB N 2.640E-05 7.275E-06 2.599E-06 1.424E-06 9.356E-07 4.528E-07 1.845E-07 9.915E-OB 6.615E-OB 4.897E-OB HUE 2. 061E-05 5. 617E-06 1.986E-06 1. 082E-06 7. 085E-07 3.410E-07 1.379E-07 7.372E-OB 4.906E-OB 3. 626E-08 1.800E-OS 4.929E-06 1. 749E-06 9. 543E-07 6.251E-07 3.009E-07 1. 217E-07 6.502E-OB 4.323E-OB 3. 193E-08 ENE 1.715E-OS 4.677E-06 1.656E-06 9.030E-07 5.914E-07 2.848E-07 1.152E-07 6.164E-OB 4.103E-OB 3.032E-OB E 1.821E-OS 4. 961E-06 1. 751E-06 9. 521E-07 6.221E-07 2.982E-07 1. 198E-07 6.368E-OB 4. 221E-08 3. 111E-08 ESE 2. 834E-05 7. 730E-06 2. 730E-06 1.484E" 06 9. 699E-07 4. 651E-07 1.870E-07 9.951E-OB 6. 602E-08 4.868E-OB SE 3.509E-OS 9.697E-06 3.466E-06 1.899E-06 1.247E-06 6.035E-07 2.459E-07 1.322E-07 8.823E-OB 6.534E-OB SSE 3.628E-05 1.013E-OS 3.656E-06 2.015E-06 1.330E-06 6.485E"07 2.677E-07 1.453E-07 9.755E-OB 7.255E-OB 80

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-11 (CONTD)

8) 2.260 OAY DECAY, UNOEPLETEO CHI/O (SEC/HETER CUBED) FOR EACH SEGMENT SFGHENT BOUNDARIES IN HILES FROH THE SITE DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROH SITE 5 2.763E-OS 7.701E-06 2.766E-06 1.515E-06 9.933E-07 4.745E-07 1.84&E-07 9.291E-OB 5.799E-OB 4.022E-OB SSW 2. 104E-05 5.933E-06 2. 152E-06 1. 186E-06 7.SIZE-07 3. 766E-07 1. 492E-07 7. 615E-08 4. 802E-08 3.355E-OB SM 1.203E-OS 3.361E-06 1.20&E-06 6.623E-07 4.343E-07 2.077E-07 8. 127E-08 4. 111E-08 2.581E-OB 1.801E-OB WSW 6.405E-06 1.797E-06 6.466E-07 3.537E-07 2.313E-07 1.09&E-07 4.210E-OB 2.083E-OB 1.286E-OB 8.865E-09 M 4.001E-06 1.095E-06 3.867E-07 2.097E-07 1.363E-07 6.412E-OB 2.424E-OB 1. 183E-08 7.228E-09 4.937E-09 MNM 7.732E-06 2.084E-06 7.250E-07 3.891E-07 2.510E-07 1.163E-07 4.274E-OB 2.033E-OB 1.222E-OB 8.256E-09 NM 1.376E-05 3.776E-06 1.337E-06 7.256E-07 4.724E-07 2.229E-07 8.513E"08 4.216E-OB 2.614E-OB 1.810E-OB NNM 2.537E-OS 7.013E-06 2.506E-06 1.369E-06 8.966E-07 4.286E-07 1.683E-07 8.590E-OB 5.449E-OB 3.842E-OB N 2.626E-05 7. 199E-06 2.551E-06 1.387E-06 9.044E-07 4.289E-07 1.659E-07 8.349E-OB 5.244E-OB 3.66&E-OB NNE 2.047E-OS 5.544E-06 1.941E-06 1.047E-06 6.792E-07 3.187E-07 1.20&E-07 5.960E-OB 3.687E-OB 2.548E-OB 1.784E-05 4.844E-OG 1.696E-06 9. 137E-07 5.91OE-07 2. 753E-07 1.025E-07 4.952E-OB 3.013E-OB 2. 055E-OB EHE 1.701E-05 4.603E-06 1.610E" 06 8.673E-07 5.613E-07 2.621E-07 9.803E-OB 4.756E-OB 2.901E-OB 1.980E-OB E 1.&OBE-OS 4. 891E-06 1.707E-06 9.184E-07 5. 938E-07 2. 769E>>07 1. 037E-07 5. 047E-08 3. 090E-08 2. 115E-08 ESE 2.813E-OS 7.623E-OB 2.663E-06 1.434E-06 9.27&E-07 4.336E-07 1.634E-07 &.016E-08 4.941E-OB 3.402E-OB SE 3. 486E-05 9. 574E-06 3.389E-06 1. 840E-06 1. 197E-06 5. 654E-07 2. 165E-07 1. 075E-07 6.672E-OB 4. 615E-OB SSE 3.600E-OS 9.979E-06 3.562E-06 1.942E-06 1.268E-06 6.016E-07 2.313E-07 1.150E-07 7.125E-OB 4.919E-OB 81

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-11 (CONTD)

C) 8.000 DAY DECAY, DEPLETED CMI/O (SEC/HETER CUBED) FOR EACH SEGMENT SEGMENT BOUNDARIES IN MILES FROM THE SITE DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20-30 30-40 40-50 FROM SITE S 2.487E-OS 6.658E-06 2.286E-06 1.213E-06 7.751E-07 3.540E-07 1.275E-07 5.998E-OB 3.588E-OB 2.411E-OB SSW 1.892E-OS 5. 121E-06 1.774E-06 9.460E-07 6.067E-07 2.788E-07 1.015E-07 4.823E-OB 2.906E-OB 1.964E-OB 5'M 1.082E-OS 2.904E-06 9.977E-07 5.294E-07 3.382E-07 1.545E-07 5.566E-OB 2.623E-OB 1.571E-OB 1.058E-OB WS'tI 5.777E-06 1.559E-06 5.378E-07 2.856E-07 1.824E-07 8.320E-OB 2.980E"08 1.391E"08 8.267E-09 5.523E-09 M 3.605E-06 9.486E-07 3.209E-07 1.688E-07 1.072E-07 4.847E-OB 1.714E-OB 7.924E-09 4.679E-09 3.111E-09 UNM 6.978E-06 1.811E-06 6.046E-07 3.155E-07 1.992E-07 8.908E-OB 3.092E-OB 1.406E-OB 8.205E-09 5.403E-09 0 1.239E-05 3.267E-06 1. 106E-06 5.816E-07 3.693E-07 1.668E-07 5.900E-OB 2.734E-OB 1.619E-OB 1.080E-OB NNM 2.280E-05 6.047E-06 2.061E-06 1.089E-06 6.935E-07 3.153E-07 1.129E-07 5.307E-OB 3.181E-OB 2.145E-OB N 2.362E-05 6.211E-06 2. 101E-06 1. 105E-06 7.013E-07 3. 169E-07 1.123E-07 5.225E-OB 3.110E-OB 2.086E-OB NNE 1.843E-OS 4.793E-06 1.604E-06 8.381E-07 5.298E-07 2.377E-07 8.323E-OB 3.832E-OB 2.263E-OB 1.507E-OB

1. 608E-05 4. 201E-06 1.409E" 06 7.367E-07 4. 655E-07 2. OBSE-07 7. 255E-08 3.311E-OB 1. 939E-08 1. 282E-08 1.532E-OS 3.988E-06 1.335E-06 6.977E-07 4.409E-07 1.976E-07 6.893E-OB 3.155E-OB 1.853E-OB 1.227E-OB E 1.628E-OS 4.232E-06 1.413E-06 7.366E-07 4.646E-07 2.075E-07 7.206E-OB 3.291E-OB 1.932E-OB 1.281E-OB ESE 2.534E-OS 6.595E-06 2.203E-06 1. 149E-06 7.248E-07 3.241E-07 1. 128E-07 5. 170E-08 3.045E-OB 2.024E-OB SE 3.137E-OS 8.274E-06 2.799E-06 1.471E-06 9.331E-07 4.210E-07 1.487E-07 6.892E-OB 4.086E-OB 2.729E-OB SSE 3.242E-05 8.636E-06 2.949E-06 1.558E-06 9.928E-07 4.510E-07 1.609E-07 7.503E-OB 4.461E-OB 2.984E-OB 82

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-11 (COHTO)

D) TURBINE OR RADMASTE DEPOSITION, 0/Q.

RELATIVE DEPOSITION PER UNIT AREA (N**-2) BY OOMNMIND SECTORS SEGMENT BOUHDARIES IH MILES DIRECTION .5-1 1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-10 10-20 20" 30 30-40 40-50 FROM SITE S 2.664E-OB 5.457E-09 1.425E-09 6.398E-10 3.620E-10 1.392E-10 4.027E-11 1.596E-11 8.523E-12 5.275E-12 SSM 1.853E-OB 3 .796E-09 9 .909E-10 4 .450E-10 2 .518E-10 9 .682E-11 2 .801E-11 1.110E-11 5.928E-12 3 .669E-12 SM 1. 160E-08 2.375E-09 6. 201E-10 2. 785E-10 1. 575E-10 6. 058E-11 1. 753E-11 6.947E-12 3. 710E-12 2. 296E-12 MSM 4. 652E-09 9. 529E-10 2.488E-10 1. 117E-10 6.321E-11 2. 431E-11 7. 032E-12 2. 787E-12 1. 488E-12 9. 212E-13 M 4. 254E-09 8. 714E-10 2. 275E-10 1. 022E-10 5. 780E-11 2.223E-11 6.430E-12 2.549E" 12 1.361E-12 8.424E-13 MNM 8.379E-09 1.716E-09 4.481E-10 2.012E-10 1.138E-10 4.378E-11 1.266E-11 5.020E-12 2.681E-12 1.659E-12 NM 1. 761E-08 3. 608E-09 9.419E-10 4. 230E-10 2.393E-10 9.203E-11 2. 662E-11 1. 055E-11 5. 635E-12 3. 488E-12 HNM 3. 707E-08 7. 593E-09 1.982E-09 8.9D3E-10 5. 036E-10 1.937E-10 5. 603E-11 2. 221E-1 1 1. 186E-I I 7.340E-12 N 4. 270E-08 8. 746E-09 2. 283E" 09 1. 025E-09 5.801E-10 2. 231E-10 6.454E-11 2. 558E-11 1.366E-I I 8. 455E-12 HNE 3.448E-OB 7.062E-09 1.844E-09 8.280E-10 4.684E-IO 1.801E-IO 5.211E-II 2.065E-11 1.103E-11 6.827E-12 2.465E-OB 5.050E-09 1.318E-09 5.921E-10 3.349E-10 1.288E-10 3.726E-11 1.477E-11 7.887E-12 4.881E-12 2.235E-OB 4.579E-09 1.195E-09 5.368E-10 3.037E-10 1.168E-IO 3.379E-11 1.339E-11 7.151E-12 4.426E-12 E 2.363E-OB 4.841E-09 1.264E-09 5.676E-10 3.211E-IO 1.235E-IO 3.572E-11 1.416E-11 7.560E-12 4.679E-12 ESE 3.810E-OB 7.804E-09 2.037E-09 9.150E-10 5.176E-IO 1.991E-10 5.759E-11 2.282E" 11 1.219E-11 7.544E-12 SE 4.168E-OB 8.537E-09 2.229E-09 1.001E-09 5.663E-10 2. 178E-10 6.300E-I I 2. 497E-11 1.333E-I I 8. 253E-12 SSE 3. 672E-08 7. 521E-09 1. 963E-09 8. 818E-10 4.988E-10 1.918E-10 5.550E-11 2. 200E-11 1. 175E-11 7. 270E-12 83

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-13 CHARACTERISTICS OF WNP-2 GASEOUS EFFLUENT RELEASE POINTS Reactor Radwaste Turbine

~Buildin ~Bull din ~Bull din Height of release point above ground level (m) 70.6m 31.1 27.7 Annual average rate of air flow from release point (m /sec) 44.8 38.7 125.6 Annual average heat flow from release point 1.06 x 10 2.9 x 10 9.1 x 10 (cal/sec)

Type and size of Duct 3 Louver houses 4 Exhaust fans release point (m) 1.14 x 3.05 1.4 x 2.4 x 0.8 1.45 x 2.01 Each Each Effective vent area (m') 3.48 2 x 2.7 3 x 2.91 Vent velocity (m/sec)* 12.9 2 x 525 cfm** 14.4 Effective diameter (m) 1.0 (mr' area)

Building height (m) 70.1 70.1 70.1

Reactor Building exhaust in vertical direction. Radwaste and Turbine Building exhaust in horizontal plane.

'*FSAR Drawing 6-41, 525 cfm x 2 out of 3, will run at any one time.

84

AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 Table 3-14 REFERENCES FOR VALUES LISTED IN TABLES 3-8 and 3-9 Reference 1 U.S. Map Reference 2 Site Specific Reference 3 Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Revision 1, Table E-15 Reference 4 Section 2.3, WNP-2 FSAR, Table 2.3-1 Reference 5 Section 2.3, WNP-2 FSAR, page 2.3-3 Reference 6 WNP-1 8 WNP-2 Emergency Preparedness Plan Table 12. 1, Permanent Population Distribution, Rev 5, Feb. 88 Reference 7 1986 50-Mile Land Use Census, WPPSS REMP Reference 8 WNP-2 Effluent Analysis for Applicable Time Period Reference 9 Radiological Programs Calculation Log No. 88-3 Reference 10 NUREG/CR-2919 XOQDOQ: Computer Program For The Meteorological Evaluation of Routine Effluent Releases at Nuclear Power Stations, September 1982.

85

AMENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Table 3-15 DESIGN BASE PERCENT NOBLE GAS 30-MINUTE DECAY *

~Isoto e Percent of Total Activit Kr-83H 2.9 Kr-85M 5.6 Kr-85 Kr-87 15 Kr-88 18 Kr-89 0.2 Xe-131M 0.02 Xe-133M 0.3 Xe-133 8.2 Xe-135M 6.9 Xe-135 22 Xe-137 0.7 Xe-138 21

From Table 11.3-1 WNP-2 FSAR 86

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-16 ANNUAL DOSES AT TYPICAL LOCATIONS Source: WNP-2 Gaseous Effluent Whole Thyroid Distance Occupancy Body Dose Dose Location Miles hrs r mrem r mrem r BPA Ashe Substation 0.5 N 2080 1. 1E+00 1. 7E+00 DOE Train 0.5 SE* 78 6.7E-02 1. OE-01 Wye Burial Site 0.5 WNW 4.1E-03 6.5E-03 WNP-1 1.2 ESE 2080 3.8E-02 1.3E-01 WNP-4 1.0 ENE 2080 7.0E-02 1.1E-01 WNP-2 Visitor Center 0.08 ESE 8.6E-02 1. 3E-01 Taylor Flats** 4.2 ESE 8760 3.1E-02 5. 2E+00 Site Boundary*** 1.2 SE 8760 1.1E+00 1. 7E+00

The sector with the highest X/g values (within 0-0.5 mile radius) was used.

- Closest residential area representative of maximum individual dose from plume, ground, ingestion, and inhalation exposure pathways. Included for comparison.

- - Assumed continuously occupied. Actual occupancy is very low. Doses from Inhalation and Ground Exposure pathways. No food crops.

87

AMENDMENT NO, 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 3-17 ANNUAL OCCUPIED AIR DOSE AT TYPICAL LOCATIONS Annual Annual Beta Air dose Gamma Air Dose Location mrad mrad BPA Ashe Substation 8.9E-01 1. SE+00 DOE Train 5.3E-02 9.2E-02 Wye Burial Site 3.2E-03 5.7E-03 WNP-1 3.3E-02 2.8E-02 WNP-4 5.3E-02 8.5E-02 WNP-2 Visitor Center 7.0E-02 1. 2E-01 Taylor Flats* 2.3E-02 1.4E-02 Site Boundary 8. 7E-01 1.5E+00

Closest residential area.

88

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Onruorat, Wttp-2 R(re Pump House WNP-t/4 Pump House Benton SwttcMng Statton

~ ~gg eW M + North 0 eee Slto Boundary Oo p, WNu.t oRoutea I

," O'WNP-2 oi Plant Support Secondary Facility Wye Surtal ~

Ground Stet Emergency Terror Operations Factsty P

o~

oo re Ezctuston Soundary SITE BOUNDARY FOR RADIOACTIVE,GASEOUS AND LIQUID EFFLUENTS Figure 3-1 89

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Main Condenser Air E]ector Off-Gas Condensers Pr cheaters Water OFF-Gas Off-Gas Separator Condenser Recombiner s Gycol OFF-Gas Off-Gas Cooler Moisture Pre-Filters Condenser Separators Charcoal Coolers Dryer s Adsorbers Post Treatment Monitor After Elevated Filters Release SIMPLIFIED BLOCK DIAGRAM OF OFF-GAS TREATMENT SYSTEM Figure 3-3 91

ANENDNENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 Plenum Monitors

~t~rMd ReFueling Exhaust To Pump Rooms Plenum Elevated Main Steam Tunnels Release RM Plenum Monitors Cond. Pump Rm Exhaust To Turb. Opr. Deck Plenum Atmospher e Condenser Area RM Hot Mach. Shop Chem. Labs Filter To Oemin. Room Units Atmosphere Radwaste Proc. Area Control Room SIMPLIFIED BLOCK DIAGRAM OF GASEOUS WASTE SYSTEM Figure 3-2 90

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 4.0 COMPLIANCE WITH 40 CFR 190 4.1 Re uirement For 0 erabilit Requirement for. Operability 6.2.4. 1 (3. 11.4) states, "The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any Member of the Public, due to release of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrems to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems."

4.2 ODCM Methodolo for Determinin Dose and Dose Commitment from Uranium Fuel C cle Sources The annual dose or dose commitment to a Member of the Public for the uranium fuel cycle sources is determined as:

a) Dose to the total body due to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents.

b) Dose to any organ due to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents.

c) Air doses due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents.

d) Dose to any organ due to the release of radioiodines, tritium and radio-nuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents.

e) Dose due to direct radiation from the plant.

The annual dose or dose commitment to a Member of the Public from the uranium fuel cycle sources is determined whenever the calculated doses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceed twice the limits in Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1.2.a, 6.2. 1.2.b, 6.2.2.2.a, 6.2.2.2.b, 6.2.2.3.a, or 6.2.2.3.b (3.11.1.2.a, 3.11.1.2.b, 3.11.2.2.a,

3. 11.2.2.b, 3. 11.2.3.a, or 3. 11.2.3.b). Direct radiation measurements will also be made to determine if the limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2.4. 1 (3. 11.4) have been exceeded.

92

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 4.2.

~ ~ 1 Total Dose from Li uid Effluents The annual dose to a Member of the Public from liquid effluents will be determined using NRC LADTAP computer code, and methodology presented by Equation (5) in Section 2.4. It is assumed that dose contribution pathways to a Member of the Public do not exist for areas within the site boundary.

4.2.2 Total Dose from Gaseous Effluents The annual dose to a Member of the Public from gaseous effluents will be determined using NRC GASPAR computer code, and methodology presented by Equations (10), (ll) and (13) in Section 3.4. Appropriate atmospheric dispersion parameters will be used.

4.2.3 Direct Radiation Contribution The dose to a Member of the Public due to direct radiation from the reactor plant will be determined using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) or may be calculated. TLDs are placed at sample locations and analyzed as per Table 5-1. The direct radiation contribution will be documented in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report submitted 60 days after January 1 of each year.

TLD stations 1S-16S are special interest stations and will not be used for direct radiation dose determinations to a Member of the Public.

5. 0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING Radiological environmental monitoring is intended to supplement radiological

'3 effluent monitoring by verifying that measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation in the environment are not greater than expected based on effluent measurement and dose modeling of environmental exposure pathways. The Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REHP) for WNP-2 provides for measurements of radiation and radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides for which the highest potential dose commitment to a Member of the Public would result due to plant operations.

Pk AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 The WNP-2 REHP is designed to conform to regulatory guidance provided by Regulatory Guide 4. 1, 4.8 and the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position (BTP), taking into consideration certain site specific character-istics. The unique nature of the WNP-2 site on Federally owned and admin-istered land (Hanford Reservation) dedicated to energy facilities, research, waste management and as a natural reserve, forms the basis for many of the site specific parameters. Amongst the many site specific parameters con-sidered is demographic data such as:

1) No significant clusters of population including schools, hospitals, business facilities or primary public transportation routes are located within 8 km (5 mile) radius of the plant.

2) No private residences are located on the Hanford Reservation.

3) The closest resident is east of the Columbia River at a distance of approximately 4 miles.

Additional site information is available in the WNP-2 Environmental Report, Operating License Stage.

Radiological environmental monitoring activities implemented by PPM 1. 11. 1 "Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REHP) Implementation Proce-dure", as detailed in the following sections, meet or exceed the criteria of the REMP plan as specified by Requirement for Operability, 6.3. 1. 1 (3. 12. 1).

5. 1 Radiolo ical Environmental Honitorin Pro ram REHP Environmental samples for the REHP are collected in accordance with Table 5-1.

This table provides a detailed outline of the environmental sampling plan including both Requirement for Operability and non Requirement for Operability items by sample type, sample location code, sampling and collection frequency, and type and frequency of analysis of samples collected within exposure pathway. Deviations from the sampling frequency detailed in Table 5-1 may occur due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, seasonal unavailability, or other legitimate reasons. When sample media is unobtainable due to equipment malfunction,

l N

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 special actions per program instruction shall be taken to ensure that corrective action is implemented prior to the end of the next sampling period.

In some cases, alternate sample collection may be substituted for the missing specimen. All deviations from the sampling plan Requirement for Operability items detailed in the sampling plan, Table 5-1, shall be documented and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with PPM 1. 10.2, "Routine or Periodic Reports Required by Regulatory Agencies", Regulatory Guide 4.8 and BTP.

In the event that it becomes impossible or impractical to continue sampling a media of choice at currently established location(s) or time, an evaluation shall be made to determine a suitable alternative media and/or location to provide appropriate exposure pathway evaluations. The evaluation and any sub-stitution made shall be implemented in the sampling program within 30 days of identification of the problem. All changes implemented in the sampling program due to unavailability of samples shall be fully documented in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and ODCH per PPH 1. 10. 1, "Reportable Events and Occurrences Required by Regulatory Agencies". Revised sampling plan table(s) and figure(s) reflecting the new locations and/or media shall be included with the documentation.

WNP-2 sampling stations are described in Table 5-2. Each station is iden-tified by an assigned number or alphanumeric designation, meteorological sector (16 different, 22-1/2'ompass sections) in which the station is located, and radial distance from WNP-2 containment as estimated from map positions. Also included in Table 5-2 is information identifying the type(s) of samples collected at each station and whether or not the specific sample type satisfies a Requirement for Operability criteria. Figures 5-1 and 5-2 depict the geographical locations of each of the sample stations listed in Table 5-2.

5.2 Land Use Census A Land Use Census shall be conducted in accordance with the requirements of Requirement for Operability 6.3.2. 1 (3. 12.2). It shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) in each of the 16 meteorological sectors, the location of the nearest milk animal, the nearest residence and the nearest 95

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 garden of greater than 150m'500 ft') producing broad leaf vegetation. Field activities pertaining to the Land Use Census (LUC) will be initiated during the growing season and completed no later than September 30 each year. The information obtained during the field survey is used along with other demographic data to assess population changes in the unrestricted area that might require modifications in'he sampling plan to ensure adequate evaluation of dose or dose commitment.

The results of the Land Use Census will be submitted no later than October 31 of each year for evaluation of maximum individual doses or dose commitment.

All changes, such as a location yielding a greater estimated dose or dose commitment or different location with a 20 percent greater estimated dose or dose commitment than a currently sampled location, will be reported in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Report in accordance with PPH 1. 10.2 and Requirement for Operability 6.3.2. 1 (3. 12.2). The REMP plan, ODCM, will be changed to reflect new sampling location(s). The new sampling location(s) will be added to the REHP within 30 days.

The best available census information, whether obtained by aerial survey, door-to-door survey, or consultation with local authorities, shall be used to complete the Land 'Use Census and the census results shall be reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, in accordance with PPH

1. 10.2 and Technical Specification requirements.

5.3 Laborator Intercom arison Pro ram Analysis of REHP samples is contracted to a provider of radiological analyti-cal services. By contract, this analytical service vendor is required to conduct all activities in accordance with Regulatory Guides 4. 1, 4.8, and 4. 15 and to include in each quarterly report, actions pertinent to their participa-tion in the Environmental Protection Agency's (EPA) Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory Intercomparison Studies (Crosscheck) Program. A precontract award survey and annual audit at the contractor's facility ensure .

that the contractor is participating in the Crosscheck Program, as reported.

96

AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 The results of the contractor's analysis of Crosscheck samples shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report in accordance with PPM 1. 10.2 and Requirement for Operability 6.3.3. 1 (3. 12.3).

Besides the vendor's required participation in the EPA's Crosscheck Program, the Department of Health (DOH) of the State of Washington oversees an analytical program for the Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) to provide an independent test of WNP-2 REMP sample analyses. The WNP-2/DOH split samples are analyzed by Washington State's Office of Public Health Laboratories and Epidemiology, Environmental Radiation Laboratory (ERL). The State's ERL participates in the EPA Crosscheck Program, as well as other federal participatory analytical quality assurance programs. The results of the ERL analysis and EPA Crosscheck data are included in an annual report, "Environmental Radiation Program, Environmental Health Surveillance, State of Washington" and is available for comparison with the WNP-2 data.

The Supply System participates in the International Intercomparison of Environmental Dosimeter Program. Results of this intercomparison program are reported in the REMP Annual Report, when available.

5.4 Re ortin Re uirements WNP-2 radiological environmental monitoring program activities are presented annually per PPM 1. 10.2 in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (AREOR). The approved report is submitted to the Administrator, Region V Office of Inspection and Enforcement, with copies to the Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, and the State of Washington Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council (EFSEC) and Radiation Control Section, DOH, by May 1 of each year for program activities conducted the previous calendar year. The period of the first operational report begins with the date of initial criticality.

The annual report is to include the following types of information: a tabulated summary; interpretations and analyses of trends for results of radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including comparisons with operational controls, preoperational studies, and previous environmental surveillance reports as appropriate; an assessment of 97

AMfNDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 the observed impacts of plant operation on the environment; a brief description of the radiological environmental monitoring program; maps representing sampling station locations, keyed to tables of distance and direction from reactor containment; results of the Land Use Census; and the results of analytical laboratory participation in the EPA's Crosscheck Program. The tabulated summary shall be presented in a format represented in Table 5-3. A supplementary report is required if all analytical results are not available for inclusion in the annual report within the specified time frame. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible upon receipt of the results. Along with the missing data, the supplementary report shall include an explanation as to the cause for the delay in completion of the analysis. within the report period.

A nonroutine radiological environmental operating report is required to be submitted within 30 days from the end of any quarter in which a confirmed measured radionuclide concentration in an environmental sample averaged over the quarter sampling period exceeds a reporting level. Table 5-4 specifies the reporting level (RL) for most radionuclides of environmental importance due to potential impact from plant operations. When more than one of the nuclides listed in Table 5-4 is detected in a sample, the reporting level is considered to be exceeded and a nonroutine report required if the following conditions are satisfied:

Concentration I Concentration 2 Reporting Level (1) Reporting Level (2)

For radionuclides other than those listed in Table 5-4, the reporting level is considered to have been exceeded if the potential annual dose to an individual is greater than or equal to the design objective doses of Appendix I, 10 CFR 50. When a nonroutine report on an unlisted (Table 5-4) radionuclide must be issued, it shall include an evaluation of any release conditions, environmental factors, or other aspects necessary to explain the anomalous sample results.

98

AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 When it can be demonstrated that the anomalous sample result(s) exceeding reporting levels is not the result of plant effluents, a nonroutine report does not have to be submitted. A full discussion of the sample result and subsequent evaluation or investigation of the anomolous result will be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operational Report.

99

TABLE 5-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONHENTAL HONITORING PROGRAH PLAN Sam le T e" Sam le Location Code*

Sampling and Collection Fre uenc

'ype and Frequency of Anal sis'.

AIRBORNE

a. Particulates and 1, 4-9A, 21, 23, 40, Continuous sampling Particulate: Gross beta, radioiodine 48 and 57 Weekly collection weekly; gamma isotopic, (5/12) quarterly composite (by location)

Radioiodine: I-131 analysis, weekly

b. Soil 9A, 1, 7, 21, and 23 Annually- Gamma isotopic, annually (0/7) strontium-90 when requested'amma 101, 118 quarterly, or more often, as needed isotopic'.

DIRECT RADIATION TLD 1-9A, 10-25, 40-47, quarterly, annually TLD converted to exposure (34/56) 49-51, 53-56, quarterly, annual processing 1S-16S

3. WATERBORNE

a. Surface/ 26, 27, 28 and 29 Composite aliquots', Gamma isotopic', gross beta, Drinking monthly monthly; tritium, quarterly (3/5 composite strontium-90, iodine-131, when requested'01 Grab samples weekly or Gamma isotopic, tritium more often, as needed

TABLE 5-1 (contd.)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM PLAN Sam le T e" Sam le Location Code*

Sampling and Collection Fre uenc

'ype of and Frequency Anal sis'.

Ground water 31, 32, and 52 quarterly Gamma isotopic'nd tritium, (2/3) quarterly

c. Sanitation 102 Monthly Gamma isotopic Facility (o/1) Annually Alpha, beta, gamma isotophic Prior to discharge Alpha, beta, gamma isotopic'

TABLE 5-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM PLAN Sam le T e" Sam le Location Code*

Sampling and Collection Fre uenc

'ype of and Frequency Anal sis'.

Sediment from 33 and 34 Semiannually Gamma isotopic, shoreline semiannually (1/2)

e. Sediment from 102 Semiannually Gamma isotopic sanitation facility (0/1)

4. INGESTION

a. Milk'4/>)

36, 40, 59, 62, 64 Semimonthly during Gamma isotopic and and 96 grazing season, i odine- 131, m'onthly/

monthly at other times semimonthly strontium-90, when requested7

b. Fish~ 30, 38, or 39 Annually, unless an Gamma isotopic, when (2/2) impact is indicated, semiannually'B, sampled then

c. Garden produce 9C, 37 and 91 Monthly during growing Gamma isotopic', when (2/4) season in the sampled Riverview area of Pasco and a control near Grandview.

Annually for the apple sample collection at Station 91.

Sample locations are graphically depicted in Figures 5-1 and 5-2. UD

'Deviations are permitted if samples are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, seasonal am availability, malfunction of automatic sampling equipment, or other legitimate reasons. All deviations will be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.

'Particulate sample filters will be analyzed for gross beta after at least 24-hour decay. If gross beta activity is greater than 10 times the yearly mean of the control sample, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual sample.

TABLE 5-1 (contd.)

Gamma isotopic means identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents of the facility.

'TLD refers to thermoluminescent dosimeter. For purposes of WNP-2 RENP, a TLD is a phosphor card (32mm x 45mm x 0.5mm) with eight individual read-out areas (four main dosimeter areas and four back-up dosimeter areas) in each badge case. TLDs used in REHP meet the requirements of Regulatory Guide 4. 13 (ANSI N545-1975), except for specified energy-dependence response. Correction factors are available for energy ranges with response outside of the specified tolerances. TLD stations 1S-16S and 61 are special interest stations and are not included amongst the 34 routine TLD stations required by Requirement for Operability, Table 7.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1).

Composite samples will be collected with equipment which is capable of collecting an aliquot at time intervals which are short relative to the compositing period. A composite sample is also one in which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow.

'Station 26, WNP-2 makeup water intake from the Columbia River, satisfies the Requirement for Operability criteria for upstream surface water and drinking water control samples. The discharge water (Station 27) samples are used to fulfill the Requirement for Operability criteria for a downstream sample.

However, they provide very conservative estimates of downstream concentrations. Drinking water samples are not routinely analyzed for 1-131 from two week composite, but I-131 analysis will be performed when the calculated dose for the consumption of water is greater than 1 mrem per year to the. maximum organ. When the gross beta result in drinking water is greater than ten times the mean of the previous month's data for the control location or greater than 8 pCi/liter, Sr-90 analysis shall be performed.

Hilk samples will be obtained from farms or individual milk animals which are located in sectors with high calculated annual average ground-level D/gs and high dose potential. There are no milk animals located within 5 km of WNP-2. If cesium-134 or cesium-137 is measured in an individual milk sample in excess of 30 pCi/1, then strontium-90 analysis shall be performed.

There are no commercially important species in the Hanford reach of the Columbia River. Host recreationally important species in the area are anadromous, primarily salminoids. Three species will normally be collected by electroshock technique in the vicinity of the plant discharge (Station 30). If C7 electroshocking produces insufficient fish samples, anadromous species may be obtained from Ringold Fish Hatchery (Station 39). Control samples are normally collected from the Snake River, in the vicinity of Ice R C

C:H Harbor Dam (salminoids may be obtained through the National Marine Fisheries Service at Lower Granite Dam). C/l Three species (same ones obtained from the Columbia River) will be collected from the control location. If C) any of the analytical results of the Columbia River fish samples are significantly higher than the results LQ of the Snake River samples or the results of previous fish samples, sampling will be conducted semiannually.

TABLE 5-1 (contd.)

'Garden produce will routinely be obtained from farms or gardens using Columbia River water for irrigation. One sample of a root crop, leafy vegetable, and a fruit should be collected each sample period if available. The variety of the produce sample will be dependent on seasonal availability.

'oil samples are collected to satisfy the requirements of the Site Certification Agreement (SCA),

WNP-2. If gamma isotopic results for an indicator sample are greater than ten times the mean of the control station (station 9) data, the sample shall be analyzed for Sr-90.

"The fraction in parenthesis under each sample type gives the ratio of the number of Requirement for Operability sample locations to the total number of sample locations for the sample type that is currently included in the overall WNP-2 radiological environmental monitoring program.

TABLE 5-2 WNP-2 REHP LOCATIONS Station Sector Radial Miles'LD A~P AI SW DW GW SE MI FI GP ~SO S 1.3 0 X NNE 1.8 SE 2.0 SSE 9.3 ESE 7.7 S 7.7 WNW 2.7 ESE 4.5 9A* WSW 30.0 9B* WSW 35.0 9C WSW 33.0 10 E 3.1 ll ENE 3.1 12 NNW 6.1 13 SW 1.4 14 WSW 1.4 15 W 1.4 16 WNW 1.4 m

17 NNW 1.2 UO z'm C) lO R) CD

5-2 Station Miles'ABLE (Continued)

Sector Radial TLO ~AP AI SW DW GW SE MI F I GP ~SO 18 N 0 19 NE 1.8 20 ENE 1.9 21 ENE 1.5 22 E 2.1 23 ESE 3.0 24 SE 1.9 25 SSE 1.6 26* E 3.2 0 0 27 E 3.2 X 28 SSE 7.4 0 0 29 SSE 11.0 30 E 3.3 31 ESE 32 ESE 1.2 33* ENE 3.6 ESE 3.5 36 ESE 7.2 37A SSE 17.0 UD 37B SSE 16.0 M Dl 38* E 26.5 CD 38A E 30.0

TABLE 5-2 (Continued)

Station Sector Radial Miles'LD ~AP AI SW OW GW SE MI F I GP SO 39 NE 40 SE 6.4 41 SE 5.8 42 ESE 5.6 43 E 5.8 44 ENE 5.8 45 ENE 4.3 46 NE 5.0 47 N 0.5 48 NE 4.5 49 NW 1.2 50 SSW 1.2 51 ESE 2.1 52 N 0.1 53 N 7.5 54 NNE 6.5 55 SSE 7.0 56 SSW 7.0 57 N 0.8 59 SE 9.6

5-2 Hiles'ABLE (Continued)

Station Sector Radial TLD ~AP AI SFW SW DW GW SE HI FI V GP ~SO 62 SE 10.9 X ESE 9.9 91 ESE 4.4 .

96* MSW 36.0 101 ENE 0.3 102 SE 0.3 118 S 0.3 1S(71) N 0.3 2S(72) NNE 0.4 3S(73) NE 0.5 4S(74) ENE 0.4 5S(75) E 0.4 6S(76) ESE 0.4 7S(77) SE 0.5 8S(78) SSE 0.7 9S(79) S 0.7

TABLE 5-2 (Continued)

Station Sector Radial Hiles TLD ~AP AI SW DW GW SE HI F I GP ~SO 10S(80) SSW 0.8 X 11S(81) SW 0.7 12S(82) WSW 0.5 13S(83) W 0.5 14S(84) WNW 0.5 15S(85) NW 0.5 16S(86) NNM 0.4

Control location.

X Sample collected at station that is not included in the Requirement for Operability (non-RETS) 0 Radiological Environmental Requirement for Operability sample collected at station.

a Estimated from center of WNP-2 Containment from map positions.

b Included in sampling program to satisfy requirements for Site Certification Agreement with the State of Washington.

AP/AI = Air Particulate and Iodine SW Surface Mater (River Water)

DW Drinking Water GW Ground Water SFM Sanitation Facility Water SE Shoreline Sediment HI Hilk FI Fish GP Garden Produce SO Soil

AMENDMENT NO. 12 JANUARY 1993 t

10mLRadius ~i Iy

)I nocccccc II I ~ir BASH I

~ 4 I

I

~s

'I C I Jan

~

o /cr OOnCCO AO

~t I p nc I I ccccacwno nc 4 soccer ROlpa I I A pr r lc I .rr d CAC

~ Cl COCA 4 Acncc nc

~ rc I Cncaclo ~ ccccoao lo err ~

~ ACA44 1 CCACCAC I 4AAC4 II Il Il oc l3 Ia

~I I I

~ l ~ I nn ~5 I I I ~

J-

~ co ccccsc la calcic lcc g

4A i~

la o

~ cn I cc

~4 I 2A10 Jc cc I ~ 5 IL

~ ~t 'Ll sh Ccaccc, ~ CCCC ln I CCC g I oac I

I faccccccc sea lr Ir 1 ~ ~ I Case na I

anford la ~

oaowoco ~ COCA rli 'v- -"

ACC ite rc III ance J

I I I

is +

~ waletg I

~ c AAaocccoll ccl ~

t ccc cca I

n cn js arA ANcccncscc qOCCCCACCCC js nA 4 ncconc 2

a E

>o~ I1$ 5

.e,,~~uJ, ) I I +

ccoclcsca C Franklin County Benton County IACCO OOAO RICHULND ~ novo cn oo ccccc olAI 4 oaccccn coos

~ AC

~ CACI

~ ~ oc RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING SAMPLE LOCATIONS INSIDE OF 10 MILE RADIUS Figure 5-1 109

~ Olheso WASHINGTON Lower Grarsle Dam Lyorl Snake IUver P6rsr Hantord ~ Pony Raprds Rrsenra5on Dam Unre Goose Lerror Dam aronurne oral WNP.R Dam LO mae la@us ~ Pomeroy Car4<on ~

AOC IDAHO

~ Sunnysare ~ Dayton AOA Weal ~ Swear Gra~ I Benlon Passe ke Harbor Dam OS 37AB

~ Prosser ~

Kennewkk

~ Wana Wale OREGON 1 rnch ~18rnaes 0 8 18 A Sempre Locations OOOSddal Jsn sash Radiological Environmental Monitoring Sample Locations Outside of 10-Mile Radius Figure 5-2

~ H

~ I ev Ktt ~ I t>> W

~

~ t>>e ew>> w<<w I M eeet we Neet kwt et MM tv Mkw WWWHW>>

! r'!

~ \ \et I <<Wkuvkv>>HIM ~ 44 I HHH>>H t HW~ ewv avvveHHHHW

>> 1<<MIW M ~

HHM

~ WWW

~HM>>Mtaoev

~ 1 st pit 4 taco w awwew

~ H IHHH

~ M M et

\t I >>

K>>t ~W~ WM H ~ tw eeM

~ >>tMW H\ tle>>

taeeo w ~ H ooe

~ Mt ewe<< ~ tt e<<ev>>

~

~\

I ~~

~

IHHHHt 14e I M\Ivuta ~

I all ~ Hal ~t ~ ~ e>><<e HWH eMWHtel ke N ~~

ee ~ ~

~ I HHH ev Wk t et 4 k 114 tv >>>>tv e

s rl ~ tovw tl awe>>ewtw

~t <<HeHWHWW IH H ~ I ~ e ~ toN MMH>>

Ot H tW\Ht H ee>>vwe I

~

et HIH >>K twetwwt

~ewe Qcs ~ ~

eW Hwt ~

Ht NMI~ teto HHHMtl Ittke>>

~ te<<Mw I t

~ t>> NWOHW l>>N I) ~pe 00 Sg $ 0] M Htl W

ww<< ee 4>>>>

tvt >>f4<>H Het

~0 1 I i>>4 ii CO >>>>4

~

<<NWHK 1ve

>>
to~ Mw
~eS
~ ~ ~ >>t>>eve<< etIt to Hettwav NMW 01 ~ ICI4
.-n cf.M H'I
~
~
atl
~4 M ~
>>\
~
I eall e<<as ~41w>>veal ~
~I
~4 I~ H Maes N W HMM I I IH>>llsael>>TH>> L3 QMMW t<< ~ ee KHI Hvee ~ s ts ~1 M
~~ Hvw<<HII ~ acv
~ tHM evtwea>>e
~1 I II
~4 ~
t W>> Ntte
~ Hv4 r
ski ~ CS ~
I
~ e HH Vtt
~ It IWMIHIHIH ~
M M
~
N H H t ~ ~Htv
~
t ~
tt et) loteel tv tee\to NIHH>>
tj"," I ~ W I4IK t t>>
r w 1.A pm HC
~ aHHII ii ~
o 3N t'e 1 e>>K eve
~ wvvatee>>H teil eklkkawu
fNlsaul I skis H I ~
ow I II
~ et
~ M ~
~ ot M
~
~
Hetoww
~ eM>>eve t 4 N awvow
'ow -
0 1) 100 ills
~e 01" l<<il SS r-Cg
--'
~ I Hei Nl M eet
~
~
et<<@I le oveeeeM we Mve fees M tete ~tww we
~e oft 4ewte
~0 H ttt ~ t 4
t\wwea>>>>avwwH ~
TS I 11 ss 0 I~
WHI ~ HIHI ~
~aesu3 M ~1 I::::.
~0 lveeo~&4t ~ Hvet ~
~ et>> t<<N M
<<N ~tt
--- ry 10 Nl et ~
as<<4<<
t~ L:=:-.::
E I taw el'tv4 el IWH I ~ s
~ HAMI T Ilaala H'>>Hl>>4>>ll II 8 9;IlI g3,C I
~ IT
~ kls Nee
~
~
IMI HS ll>>CS Ice>>ITfless ~6 iilsi st>>eats
<<CC INC N HlI la rues Q K
I I.e>>lee>>I>>s O~e 0 IIIa<<ea i
~ I ~ H>>llIIve 114eelvaa 1CC II~ I
~ I II~
~
ekn>>41 a>>~ (i)~ ~
--~M
~ 1 takes 4 <<HA I>>u aua
- 0 0 Naaceeesl 1st ~
86
~n }>> ' 'Meta Hekv
)I Qss ~ oane IM HC4>>lle>>a<<vl
~ }T till. Hsfsss IMMI ~I M .I..ccccas wp} Ck}
~ Wau CI
~k tvl ave tea ~ el aetaMt too Htfetecs>>e I IHI>>tef>>M H>> nl I>>el 4 ~ till~ ~ III'I'IY PTP I } SI ~~
.
et lake>>oa t}tlat}}}Hl(I }>>flea>> ~ } }aawlaloe I IC>>le ~ TIrLE SITE MAP M>>l HH g(P-2
~ ~ I~ FS~KQ V9 I 2 3 0 5 6 6 6 10 11 12 13 10 I 16 17 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Sample Locations Near Plant 2 Figure 5-3
TABLE 5-3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL HONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL
SUMMARY
'ocket Name of Facility Ho. Location of Facility Reporting Period (County, State) Location with Highest Hedium or Type and All Indicator Annual Hean Kumber of Pathway Sampled Total Kumber Lower Limit Locations Hean f Control Locations Honroutine (Unit of of Analyses of Detection Hean (f) Distance and Hean (f) Reported Measurement Per formed ~LLO Ran a Otaanttnn Ranrae Ran e Measurements Air particulates Gross 416 0.01 0.08 (200/312) Hiddletown 0.10 (5/52) 0.08 (8/104) (pCi/m ) (0.05-2.0) 5 mi. 340 (0.08-2.0) (1.05-1.40)
-Spec 32 137co 0.01 0.05 (4/24) Smithville 0.08 (2/4) LLO (0.03-0.13) 2.5 mi. 160 (0.03-2.0) 131) 0.07 0.12 (2/24) Podunk 0.20 (2/4) 0.02 (2/4)
(0.09-0.18) 4.0 mi. 270 (0.10-0.31) Fish (pCi/kg) -Spec. 8 (wet weight) 137co 130 LLD LLO 90 (1/4) 134co 130 LLO LLD LLO Goc. 130 180 (3/4) River Hile 35 See Column 4 LLD (150-225) 'Suttmary Table is taken from the NRC's Branch Technical Position, Rev. 1, Nov. 1979, and provided for illustrative purposes only. 'Hean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parentheses (f)
TABLE 5-4 REPORTING LEVELS FOR NONROUTINE OPERATING REPORTS Reporting Level (RL) Airborne Particulate Broad Leaf
~Anal sis Water or Gases Fish lid ~V (pCi/1) (pCi/H ) (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/Kg, wet)
H-3 2x10* Hn-54 1 x 10 3x10' Fe-59 4 x 10 x 10 Co-58 1 x 10 3 x 10 Co-60 3x10 1 x 10 Zn-65 3x10 2 x 10 Zr-Nb-95 4 x 10 I-131 0.9 1 x 10 Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 60 1 x 10 Cs-137 50 20 2 x 10 70 2 x 10 Ba-La-140 2 x 10 3 x 10
'For drinking water samples. This is 40 CFR Part 141 value.
m
%O R Z c=m QR s O
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.0 CONDUCT OF TESTS AND INSPECTIONS IN SUPPORT OF WNP-2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT AND RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS 113
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992
6. 0 INTRODUCTION NOTE: In accordance with Generic Letter 89-01, the following Limiting Conditions for Operations (LCO) have been relocated from the WNP-2 Technical Specifications to the ODCM. To differentiate between Technical Specifications and ODCM programs, the following title changes have been made:
Limiting Condition for Operation Requirement for Operability Applicability Relevant Conditions Action Compensatory Measures Surveillance, Surveillance Requirements Periodic Tests and Inspections The following, Requirement for Operability are numbered sequentially as part of Section 6.0. The Technical Specification numbering has been retained in parenthesis to promote traceability. The above changes will conform to plant practices being developed with the WNP-2 Improved Technical Specifications Program. Further sections 1.0 and 4.0 of the WNP-2 Technical Specifications are to be followed in conforming to this section and applicability statements 3.0. 1, 3.0.2, 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 of the WNP-2 Technical Specifications are to be followed as applied in the text of the Requirement for Operability. 114
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992
6. I INSTRUMENTATION IN SUPPORT OF WNP-2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT MONITORING REQUIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 115
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 6.1 3 4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 6.1.1
~ ~ 3 4.3.7.11 RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS
6. 1. 1. 1 (3.3.7. 11) The radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 6. 1. 1. 1-1 (3.3.7. 11-1) shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1. 1 (3. 11. l. 1) are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoints of these channels shall be determined and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters described in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM).
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With a radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above specification, immediately suspend the release of radio-active liquid effluents monitored by the affected channel or declare the channel inoperable.
b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the COMPENSATORY MEASURES shown in Table 6. l. l. 1-1 (3.3.7. 11-1).
Restore the inoperable instrumentation to OPERABLE status within the time specified in the COMPENSATORY MEASURES or, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, explain why this inoperability was not corrected within the time specified in the next Radioactive Effluent Release Report.
c. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS and INSPECTIONS 6.1.1.1.1 (4.3.7.11) Each radioactive liquid effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 6. 1. 1. 1. 1-1 (4.3.7. 11-1). 116
TABLE 6.1.1.1-1 3.3.7.11-1 RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS COMPENSATORY INSTRUMENT OPERABLE MEASURES
1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 100

b. Turbine Building Sump 1/SUAlp 101

2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOHOTIVE TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Service Water System Effluent Line 101

b. RHR Service Water System Effluent Line 1/Loop 101

3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line 102

b. Plant Discharge-Blowdown Line 102 U CI K Pl C)
W ~ LD NO
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6. 1. 1. 1-1 3.3.7. 11-1 (Continued) COMPENSATORY MEASURES COMPENSATORY With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by MEASURE 100 the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirements, effluent releases via. this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that prior to initiating a release: At least two independent samples of the batch are analyzed in accordance with Periodic Tests and Inspections 6.2. l. l. 1 (4. 11. 1. 1. 1) and 6.2. 1. 1.2 (4.11.1.1.2) and
b. At least two technically qualified members of the facility staff independently verify the release rate calculations and the discharge valve lineup; Otherwise, suspend release of radioactive effluents via this pathway.
COMPENSATORY- With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by HEASURE 101 the Minimum Channel OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that, at least once per 12 hours, grab samples are collected and are analyzed for gross radioactivity (beta or gamma) at a limit of detection of at least 10 microcurie/mL. COMPENSATORY- With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by HEASURE 102 the Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours during actual releases. Pump performance curves generated in place may be used to estimate flow. 118
TABLE 6.1.1. .1-1 4.3.7.11-1 RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS CHANNEL CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION
TEST
1. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM AND AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Li quid Radwaste Effluent Line R(3) g(1,2)

b. Turbine Building Sump R(3) g(1,5)

2. GROSS RADIOACTIVITY MONITORS PROVIDING ALARM BUT NOT PROVIDING AUTOMATIC TERMINATION OF RELEASE

a. Service Water System Effluent Line D R(3) P(5)

b. RHR Service Water System Effluent Line D R(3) Q(2)

3. FLOW RATE MEASUREMENT DEVICES

a. Liquid Radwaste Effluent Line D(4) N.A.

b. Plant Discharge-Blowdown Line D(4) N.A.
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6. l. l. l. 1-1 4.3.7. 11-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that automatic isolation of this pathway occurs if the: Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint. (2) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL'TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exists:
1. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

2. High voltage abnormally low.

3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.

4. Instrument controls not set in operate mode.
The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more reference standards certified by the National Institute of Science and Technology (HIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with NIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system. For subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION, sources that have been related to the initial calibration shall be used. (4) CHANNEL CHECK shall consist of verifying indication of flow during periods of release. CHANNEL CHECK shall be made at least once per 24 hours when continuous, periodic, or batch releases are made. (5) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exists:
l. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

2. High voltage abnormally low.

3. Instrument indicates a downscale failure.
120
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.1 3 4.3 INSTRUMENTATION 6.1.2
~ ~ 3 4.3.7.12 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION CONTROLS
6. 1.2. 1 (3.3.7. 12) The radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels shown in Table 6. 1.2. 1-1 (3.3.7. 12-1) shall be OPERABLE with their alarm/trip setpoints set to ensure that the limits of Requirements for Operability 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1) are not exceeded. The alarm/trip setpoint of these channels shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters described in the ODCM.
RELEVANT CONDITION: As shown in Table 6.1.2.1-1 (3.3.7.12-1). COMPENSATORY MEASURES:
a. -
With a radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel alarm/trip setpoint less conservative than required by the above specification, immediately initiate action to suspend the release of radioactive gaseous effluents monitored by the affected channel or change the setpoint so it is acceptably conservative or declare the channel inoperable.
b. With less than the minimum number of radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channels OPERABLE, take the COMPENSATORY MEASURES shown in Table 6. 1.2. 1-1 (3.3.7. 12-1).
Restore the inoperable instrumentation to OPERABLE status within the time specified in the COMPENSATORY MEASURES or, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, explain why this inoperability was not corrected within the time specified in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report. C. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not .applicable. PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS
6. 1.2 . 1. 1 (4 .3 .7 . 12) Each radioactive gaseous effluent monitoring instrumentation channel shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performance of the CHANNEL CHECK, SOURCE CHECK, CHANNEL CALIBRATION, and CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST operations at the frequencies shown in Table 6. 1.2. 1. 1-1 (4.3.7. 12-1).
121
TABLE 6. 1.2. 1-1 3.3.7. 12-1 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS RELEVANT COMPENSATORY INSTRUMENT OPERABLE CONDITIONS MEASURES
1. Hain Condenser Offgas Post-Treatment Radiation Monitor

a. Gross Gamma Detection Alarm and 110 Automatic Isolation of the Offgas System Outlet and Drain Valves

2. Hain Condenser Offgas Pre-Treatment Radiation Monitor

a. Gamma Sensitive Ion-Chamber Located Upstream of Holdup Line

3. Hain Plant Vent Release Monitor

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

1) Low Range 110

2) Intermediate Ra'nge 110

b. Iodine Sampler 112

c. Particulate Sampler 112

d. Effluent System Flow Rate Monitor 113

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 113
TABLE 6. 1.2. 1-1 3.3.7. 12-1 (Continued) RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION MINIMUM CHANNELS RELEVANT COMPENSATORY INSTRUMENT OPERABLE CONDITIONS MEASURES Turbine Building Ventilation Exhaust Monitor
a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

1) Low Range 110

2) Intermediate Range 110

b. Iodine Sampler 112

c. Particulate Sampler 112

d. Effluent System Flow Rate Monitor 113

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 113

5. Radwaste Building Ventilation Exhaust

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

1) Low Range 110

2) Intermediate Range 110

b. Iodine Sampler 112

c. Particulate Sampler 112

d. Effluent System Flow Rate Measurement 115 Device ¹

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 113
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.1.2.1-1 3.3.7.12-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS
At all times.
During main condenser offgas treatment system operation.
8 Radwaste Building ventilation exhaust fan. There are 3 fans; WEA-FN-1A, WEA-FN-1B and WEA-FN-1C. COMPENSATORY MEASURES COMPENSATORY With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the MEASURE 110 Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that grab samples are taken at least once per 8 hours and analyzed for noble gas gamma emitters within 24 hours. COMPENSATORY With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the MEASURE 112 Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that within 4 hours after the channel has been declared inoperable samples are continuously collected with auxiliary sampling equipment as required in Table 6.2.2. 1.2-1 (4.11-2). COMPENSATORY With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the MEASURE 113 Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway may continue for up to 30 days provided that the flow rate is estimated at least once per 4 hours. COMPENSATORY With the number of channels operable less than required by the MEASURE 114 Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, gases from the main condenser offgas treatment system may be released to the environment for up to 72 hours provided:
a. The offgas treatment system is not bypassed, and

b. The offgas post-treatment monitor used in a pretreatment function shall be OPERABLE.*
COMPENSATORY With the number of channels OPERABLE less than required by the MEASURE 115 Minimum Channels OPERABLE requirement, effluent releases via this pathway shall be terminated.
With the offgas post-treatment monitor in a pretreatment function unavailable or inoperable, install a temporary replacement ionization chamber for the pre-treatment monitor or be in HOT STANDBY within the following 12 hours.
124
TABLE 6.1.2.1.1-1 4.3.7.12-1 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS RE UIREMENTS NODES IN WHICH CHANNEL PERIODIC TESTS CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL AND INSPECTIONS INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST ARE RE VIREO Hain Condenser Offgas Post-Treatment Radiation Monitor
a. Gross gamma detector alarm and R(2) automatic isolation of the offgas system outlet and drain valves

2. Hain Condenser Offgas Pre-Treatment Radiation Monitor

a. Gamma sensitive ion chamber located D R(2) upstream of holdup line

3. Hain Plant Release Monitor

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

1) Low Range H R(2) q(1)

2) Intermediate Range H R(2) Q(6)

b. Iodine Sampler N.A. N.A. N.A.

c. Particulate Sampler N.A. N.A. N.A.

d. Effluent System Flow Rate Monitor N.A. R m

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor Ca M N.A. R W D C: Pl PR wQ g) ~
~ lO
TABLE 6. 1.2. 1. 1-1 4.3.7. 12-1 (Continued) RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS RE UIREMENTS MODES IN WHICH CHANNEL PERIODIC TESTS CHANNEL SOURCE CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL AND INSPECTIONS INSTRUMENT CHECK CHECK CALIBRATION TEST ~ARE E II ER
4. Turbine Building Ventilation Exhaust Monitor

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

1) Low Range R(2) Q(1)

2) Intermediate Range M R(2) Q(6)

b. Iodine Sampler N.A. N.A. N.A.

c. Particulate Sampler N.A. N.A. N.A.

d. Effluent System Flow Rate Monitor N.A. R Q

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor N.A. R

5. Radwaste Building Ventilation Exhaust

a. Noble Gas Activity Monitor

1) Low Range 0 M R(2) Q(1)

2) Intermediate Range D M R(2) Q(6)

b. Iodine Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.AD

c. Particulate Sampler W N.A. N.A. N.A.

d. Effluent System Flow Rate Monitor D(3) N.A. R(5) Q(4)

e. Sampler Flow Rate Monitor 0 N.A. R Q
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6. 1.2. 1. 1-1 4.3.7. 12-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS
At all times.
During main condenser offgas treatment system operation (1) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall also demonstrate that control room alarm annunciation occurs if any of the following conditions exist:
a. Instrument indicates measured levels above the alarm setpoint.

b. Circuit failure.
(2) The initial CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using one or more reference radioactive standards traceable to the NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (NIST) or using standards that have been obtained from suppliers that participate in measurement assurance activities with HIST. These standards shall permit calibrating the system over its intended range of energy and measurement range. Subsequent CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed using the initial radioactive standards or other standards of equivalent quality or radioactive sources that have been related to the initial calibration. The CHANNEL CHECK shall be performed by comparing a computer reading or power signal comparing each fan's local amperage reading with preestablished baseline values. (4) The CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST shall be performed by measurement of the phase currents for each fan. (5) The CHANNEL CALIBRATION shall be performed by using a flow measurement device to determine the fan current to flow relationship. (6) For the CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST on the intermediate range noble gas activity monitors, demonstrate that circuit failures or instrument controls when set in the OFF position produce control room alarm annunciation. 127
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 REQUIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY SUPPORT OF RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT MONITORING PROGRAMS 128
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 3 4. 11 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.1 3 4.11.1 LI UID EFFLUENTS 6.2. 1. 1 CONCENTRATION RE UIREMENTS FOR OPERABILITY 6.2. 1. 1 (3. 11. l. 1) The concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see ODCM Figure 3-1) shall be limited to the concentrations specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2 for radionuclides other than dissolved or entrained noble gases. For dissolved or entrained noble gases, the concentration shall be limited to 2 x 10'icrocurie/ml total activity. RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: With the concentration of radioactive material released in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the concen-tration to the above limits. PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2. 1. 1. 1 (4. 11. 1. l. 1) Radioactive liquid wastes shall be sampled and analyzed according to the sampling and analysis program of Table 6.2. 1. 1. 1-1 (4.11-1). 6.2. 1. 1.2 (4. 11. 1. 1.2) The results of the radioactivity analyses shall be used in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to assure that the concentrations at the point of release are maintained within the limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1. 1 (3. 11. 1. 1). 129
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.2. 1. 1. 1-1 4. 11-1 RADIOACTIVE LI UID WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM LOWER LIMIT MINIMUM OF DETECTION LIQUID RELEASE SAMPLING ANALYSIS TYPE OF ACTIVITY (LLD)'yCi/ml TYPE FREQUENCY FREQUENCY ANALYSIS ) A. Batch Waste P Release Tanks' Each Batch Each Batch Emitters'x10 Principal Gamma I-131 1x10 P Dissolved and 1x10 One Batch/M Entrained Gases (Gamma fmitters) P . M 1x10 Each Batch Composite'-3 Gross Alpha 1x10 P Q Sr-89, Sr-90 5x10 Each Batch Composite'e-55 1x10 130
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.2. 1. 1. 1-1 4. 11-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS 'he LLD is defined, for purposes of these specifications, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that, will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: 4.66 sb LLD = E V '.22 x 10' Y 'xp (-A~r) Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as microcuries per unit mass or volume, s is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 x 10's the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and
~7 for plant effluents is the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting.
Typical values of E, V, Y, and ~7 should be used in the calculation. It shouid be recognized that the LLD is def'ined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. 131
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.2. l. l. 1-1 4. 11-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS " A batch release is the discharge of liquid wastes of a discrete volume. Prior to sampling for analyses, each batch shall be isolated, and then thoroughly mixed by a method described in the ODCM to assure representative sampling. 'he principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies include the following radionuclides: Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141, and Ce-144. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.1.11. " A composite sample is one in which the quantity of liquid sampled is proportional to the quantity of liquid waste discharged and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquids released. This may be accomplished through composites of grab samples obtained prior to di scharge after the tanks have been recirculated. 132
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4.11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS I. 1 ( /4..1) ~Li I EF EN 6.2.1.2 DOSE RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2. 1.2 (3. 11. 1.2) The dose or dose commitment. to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from radioactive materials in liquid effluents released to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see ODCM Figure 3-1) shall be limited:
a. During any calendar quarter to less than or equal to 1.5 mrems to the total body and to less than or equal to 5 mrems to any organ, and

b. During any calendar year to less than or equal to 3 mrems to the total body and to less than or equal to 10 mrems to any organ.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With the calculated dose from the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents exceeding any of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 .days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective action to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits. This Special Report shall also include (1) the results of radiological analyses of the drinking water source and (2) the radiological impact on finished drinking water supplies with regard to the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141.
b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.1.2.1 (4.11.1.2) Cumulative dose contributions from liquid effluents for the current calendar quarter and the current calendar year shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCH at least once per 31 days. 133
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4. 11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.l,.l t3/4.ll.l) ~LIliO EFFIUENTE 6.2. 1. 3 (3. 11. 1.3) L I UID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2. 1.3 (3. 11. 1.3) The liquid radwaste treatment system shall be OPERABLE. The appropriate portions of the system shall be used to reduce the releases of radioactivity when the projected doses due to the liquid effluent, from each reactor unit, to UNRESTRICTED AREAS (see ODCM Figure 3-1) would exceed 0.06 mrem to the total body or 0.2 mrem to any organ in a 31-day period. RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With radioactive liquid waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits and any portion of the liquid radwaste treatment system not in operation, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2 a Special Report that includes the following information: Explanation of why liquid radwaste was being discharged without treatment, identification of any inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,
2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary'escription of actions(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3,0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2. 1.3. 1 (4. 11. 1.3. 1) Doses due to liquid releases from each reactor unit to UNRESTRICTED AREAS shall be projected at least once per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. 6.2. 1.3.2 (4. 11. 1.3.2) The installed liquid radwaste treatment system shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by meeting Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1. 1 (3.11.1.1) and 6.2.1.2 (3.11.1.2). 134
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4.11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 6.2.2.1 (3.11.2.1) DOSE RATE RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1) The dose rate due to radioactive materials released in gaseous effluents from the site to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see ODCM Figure 3-1) shall be limited to the following:
a. For noble gases: Less than or equal to 500 mrems/yr to the total body and less than or equal to 3000 mrems/yr to the skin, and

b. For iodine-131, for iodine-133, for tritium, and for all radio-nuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days: Less than or equal to 1500 mrems/yr to any organ.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: With the dose rate exceeding the above limits, immediately restore the release rate to within the above limit(s). PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.2. 1. 1 (4. 11.2. 1. 1) The dose rate due to noble gases in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. 6.2.2.1.2 (4.11.2.1.2) The dose rate due to iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents shall be determined to be within the above limits in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM by obtaining representative samples and performing analyses in accordance with the sampling and analysis program specified in Table 6.2.2. 1.2-1 (4. 11-2). 135
TABLE 6.2.2. 1.2-1 4.11-2 RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS WASTE SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM HINIHUH LOWER LIMIT OF SAMPLING ANALYSIS TYPE OF DETECTION (LLD)'i GASEOUS RELEASE TYPE FRE UENCY FRE UENCY ACTIVITY ANALYSIS mL P P A. Primary Containment Each PURGE'URGE Each PURGE Principal Gamma Emitters'-3 Ix10 and VENT and VENT and VENT Grab Sample IxlO'. Hain Plant Vent Hb'rab Principal Gamma Emitters'-3 1x10" Sample 1x10 C. Turbine Building H Principal Gamma Emitters'-3 Vents and Radwaste Grab Sample Ix10'xlO Building Vents GJ ch D All Release Types Continuous's I-131 listed in A, Sample I-133 1x10'xlO'x10 B, and C above Principal Gamma Emitters W'articulate Sample Continuous'ontinuous'ontinuous H Gross Alpha lx10 Composite Par-Continuousharcoal ticulate Sample 0 Sr-89, Sr-90 lx10 Composite Par-ticulate Sample Cl Noble Gas Noble Gases cm Monitor Gross Beta or C:H Gamma equivalent) Ix10'Xe-133 CA LD
ANENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABL'E 6.2.2. 1.2-1 4. 11-2 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS 'he LLD is defined, for purposes of these specifications, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: 4.66sb LLD E
' '.22 x 10 ' 'xp (-A~t)
Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as microcuries per unit mass or volume, s, is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 x 10's the number of disintegrations per minute per microcurie, I Y is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and
~t for plant effluents is the elapsed time between the midpoint of sample collection and time of counting.
Typical values of E, V, Y, and ~t should be used in the calculation. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a posteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. 137
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.2.2. 1.2-1 4. 11-2 (Continued) TABLE 'NOTAT'IONS " Sampling and analysis shall also be performed following shutdown, startup, or a THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER within a 1-hour period. 'amples shall be changed at least once per 7 days and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours after changing, or after removal from sampler. Sampling shall also be performed at least once per 24 hours for at least 7 days following each shutdown, startup, or THERMAL POWER change exceeding 15% of RATED THERMAL POWER in 1 hour and analyses shall be completed within 48 hours of changing. When samples collected for 24 hours are analyzed, the corresponding LLDs may be increased by a factor of 10. This requirement does not apply if (1) analysis shows that the DOSE E(UIVALENT I-131 concentration in the primary coolant has not increased more than a factor of 3; and (2) the noble gas monitor shows that effluent activity has not increased more than a factor of 3. 'ritium grab samples shall be taken at least once per 7 days from the main plant vent stack to determine tritium releases in the ventilation exhaust from the spent fuel pool area whenever spent fuel is in the spent fuel pool. 'he ratio of the sample flow rate to the sampled stream flow rate shall be known for the time period covered by each dose or dose rate calculation made in accordance with Requirement for Operability 6.2.2. 1, 6.2.2.2 and 6.2.2.3 (3.11.2.1, 3.11.2.2, and 3.11.2.3). 'he principal gamma emitters for which the LLD specification applies include the following radionuclides: Kr-87, Kr-88, Xe-133, Xe-133m, Xe-135, and Xe-138 in noble gas releases and Mn-54, Fe-59, Co-58, Co-60, Zn-65, Mo-99, I'-131, Cs-134, Cs-137, Ce-141 and Ce-144 in iodine and particulate releases. This list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other gamma peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyze'd and reported in the Radioactive Effluent Release Report. 138
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4.11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 6.2.2.2 (3. 11.2.2) DOSE -- NOBLE GASES RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.2.2 (3. 11.2.2) The air dose due to noble gases released in gaseous effluents, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see ODCM Figure 3-1) shall be limited to the following:
a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 5 mrads for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 10 mrads for beta radiation and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 10 mrads for gamma radiation and less than or equal to 20 mrads for beta radiation.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With the calculated air dose from radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subse-quent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.
b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.2.2. 1 (4. 11.2.2) Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for noble gases shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days. 139
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4. 11)
~ RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) ~ ~ ~ GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 6.2.2.3 (3.11.2.3) DOSE - IODINE-131 IODINE-133 TRITIUM AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.2.3 (3.11.2.3) The dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and all radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days in gaseous effluents released, from each reactor unit, to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see ODCM Figure 3-1) shall be limited to the following:
a. During any calendar quarter: Less than or equal to 7.5 mrems to any organ and,

b. During any calendar year: Less than or equal to 15 mrems to any organ.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: 'a ~ With the calculated dose from the release of iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days, in gaseous effluents exceeding any of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 'days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit and defines the corrective actions that have been taken to reduce the releases and the proposed corrective actions to be taken to assure that subsequent releases will be in compliance with the above limits.
b. The. provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.2.3. 1 (4. 11.2.3) Cumulative dose contributions for the current calendar quarter and current calendar year for iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days shall be determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM at least once per 31 days. 140
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4.11)
~ RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) ~ ~ GASEOUS EFFLUENT 6.2.2.4 (3. 11.2.4) GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM RE UIREHENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.2.4 (3. 11.2.4) The GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM* shall be in operation in either the normal or charcoal bypass mode. The charcoal bypass mode shall not be used unless the offgas post-treatment radiation monitor is OPERABLE as specified in Table 6. 1.2. 1-1 (3.3.7. 12-1).
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: Whenever the main condenser steam jet air ejector (evacuation) system is in operation. COMPENSATORY MEASURES:
'a ~ With the GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM not used in the normal mode for more than 7 days, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which includes the following information:
1. Identification of the inoperable equipment or subsystems and the reason for inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.2.4. 1 (4. 11.2.4) The GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be verified to be in operation in either the normal or charcoal bypass mode at least once per 7 days whenever the main condenser steam jet air ejector (evacuation) system is in operation.
A GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be any system designed and installed to reduce radioactive gaseous effluents by collecting primary coolant system offgases from the primary system and providing for delay or holdup for the purpose of reducing the total radioactivity prior to release to the environment.
141
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4. 11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 6.2.2.5 (3. 11.2.5) VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.2.5 (3.11.2.5) The appropriate portions of the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be OPERABLE and shall be used to reduce radioactive materials in gaseous waste prior to their discharge when the projected doses due to gaseous effluent releases from each reactor unit to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY (see ODCM Figure 3-1) when averaged over 31 days would exceed 0.3 mrem to any organ in a 31-day period. RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a~ With the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM inoperable for more than 31 days, or with gaseous waste being discharged without treatment and in excess of the above limits, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 10 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report which includes the following information:
1. Identification of the inoperable equipment or subsystems, and the reason for the inoperability,

2. Action(s) taken to restore the inoperable equipment to OPERABLE status, and

3. Summary description of action(s) taken to prevent a recurrence.

b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable; PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.2.5. 1 (4. 11.2.5. 1) Doses due to gaseous release to areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY shall be projected at least once.per 31 days in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM.
6.2.2.5.2 (4. 11.2.5.2) The VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by operating the VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM equipment for at least 10 minutes, at least once per 92 days unless the appropriate system has been utilized to process radioactive gaseous effluents during the previous 92 days. 142
AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 6.2.2 (3/4. 11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) GASEOUS EFFLUENTS 6.2.2.6 (3.11.2.8) VENTING OR PURGING RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.2.6 (3.11.2.8) VENTING or PURGING of the Mark II containment drywell shall be through the standby gas'reatment system or the primary containment vent and purge system. The first 24 hours of any vent or purge operation shall be through one standby gas treatment system. RELEVANT CONDITIONS: All drywell vents and purges in Mode 1, 2, or 3, and when de-inerting. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With the requirements of the above specification not satisfied, suspend all VENTING and PURGING of the drywell.
b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.2.6. 1 (4. 11.2.8. 1) The containment drywell shall be determined to be aligned for VENTING or PURGING through the standby gas treatment system or the primary containment vent and purge system within 4 hours prior to start of and at least once per 12 hours during VENTING or PURGING of the drywell. 6.2.2.6.2 (4. 11.2.8.2) Prior to use of the purge system through the standby gas treatment system assure that:
a. Both standby gas treatment system trains are OPERABLE whenever the purge system is in use, and

b. Whenever the purge system is in use during OPERATIONAL CONDITION 1 or 2 or 3, only one of the standby gas treatment system trains may be used.
6.2;2.6.3 (4. 11.2.8.3) The containment drywell shall be sampled and analyzed per Table 6.2.2. 1.2-1 (4. 11-2) of Requirements for Operability 6.2.2. 1 (3.11.2.1) within 8 hours prior to the start of and at least once per 12 hours during VENTING and PURGING of the drywell through other than the standby gas treatment system. 143
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4.11) ~ RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.3 (3/4.11.3)
~ ~ ~ SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE 6.2.3.1 (3.11.3) SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.3.1 (3.11.3) Radioactive wastes shall be SOLIDIFIED or dewatered in accordance with the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM to meet shipping and transpor-tation requirements during transit, and disposal site requirements when received at the disposal site.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With SOLIDIFICATION* or dewatering not meeting disposal site and shipping and transportation requirements, suspend shipment of the inadequately processed wastes and correct the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM, the procedures and/or the solid waste system as necessary to prevent recurrence.
b. With SOLIDIFICATION or dewatering not performed in accordance with the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM, (1) test the improperly processed waste in each container to ensure that it meets burial ground and shipping require-ments and (2) take appropriate administrative action to prevent recurrence.
c ~ The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable. PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.3.1.1 (4.11.3) SOLIDIFICATION of at least one representative test specimen from at least every tenth batch of each type of wet radioactive wastes (e.g., filter sludges, spent resins, evaporator bottoms, boric acid solutions, and sodium sulfate solutions) shall be verified in accordance with the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM. a ~ If any test specimen fails to verify SOLIDIFICATION, the SOLIDIFICA-TION of the batch under test shall be suspended until such time as additional test specimens can be obtained, alternative SOLIDIFICATION parameters can be determined in accordance with the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM, and a subsequent test verifies SOLIDIFICATION. SOLIDIFICATION of the batch may then be resumed using the alternative SOLIDIFICATION parameters determined by the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM.
SOLIDIFICATION shall be the conversion of radioactive wastes from liquid systems to a homogeneous (uniformly distributed), monolithic, immobilized solid with definite volume and shape, bounded by a stable surface of distinct outline on all sides (free-standing).
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS Continued
b. If the initial test specimen from'a batch of waste fails to verify SOLIDIFICATION, the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM shall provide for the collection and testing of representative test specimens from each consecutive batch of the same type of wet waste until at least three consecutive initial test specimens demonstrate SOLIDIFICATION. The PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM shall be modified as required, as provided in Technical Specification 6.13, to assure SOLIDIFICATION of subsequent batches of waste.
c~ With the installed equipment incapable of meeting Requirement for Operability 6.2.3. 1 (3. 11.3) or declared inoperable, restore the equipment to OPERABLE status or provide for contract capability to process wastes as necessary to satisfy all applicable transportation and disposal requirements. 145
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4. 11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.4 (3/4.11.4) TOTAL DOSE RE UIREHENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.2.4. 1 (3. 11.4) The annual (calendar year) dose or dose commitment to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC, due to releases of radioactivity and radiation, from uranium fuel cycle sources shall be limited to less than or equal to 25 mrems to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems. RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a 0 With the calculated'oses from the release of radioactive materials in liquid or gaseous effluents exceeding twice the limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2.1.2.a, 6.2.1.2.b, 6.2.2.2.a, 6.2.2.2.b, 6.2.2.3.a, or 6.2.2.3.b (3.11.1.2.a, 3.11.1.2.b, 3.11.2.2.a, 3.11.2.2.b,
3. 11.2.3.a, or 3. 11.2.3.b), calculations shall be made including direct radiation contributions from the reactor units and from outside storage tanks to determine whether the above limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2.4. 1 (3. 11.4) have been exceeded. If such is the case, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that defines the corrective action to be taken to reduce subsequent releases to prevent recurrence of exceeding the above limits and includes the schedule for achieving conformance with the above limits. This Special Report, as defined in 10 CFR 20.405c, shall include an analysis that estimates the radiation exposure (dose) to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from uranium fuel cycle sources, including all effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the calendar year that includes the release(s) covered by this report. It shall also describe levels of radi ation and concentrations of radioactive material involved, and the cause of the exposure levels or concentrations. If the estimated dose(s) exceeds the above limits, and if the release condition resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 has not already been corrected, the Special Report shall include a request for a variance in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR Part 190. Submittal of the report is considered a timely request, and a variance is granted until staff action on the request is complete.

b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
146
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.2 (3/4.11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS 6.2.4 (3/4. 11.4) TOTAL DOSE Continued PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.4. 1. 1 (4. 11.4. 1) Cumulative dose contributions from liquid and gaseous effluents shall be determined in accordance with PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.2.1.2.1, 6.2.2.2.1, and 6.2.2.3.1 (4.11.1;2, 4.11.2.2, and
4. 11.2.3), and in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCH.
6.2.4. 1.2 (4. 11.4.2) Cumulative dose contributions from direct radiation from unit operation shall'e determined in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCH. 147
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.3 REQUIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY SUPPORT OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM 148
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.3 (3/4.12) RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 6.3.1 (3/4.12.1) MONITORING PROGRAM RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.3. 1. 1 (3. 12. 1) The radiological environmental monitoring program shall be conducted as specified in Table 6.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1). RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a ~ With the radiological environmental monitoring program not being conducted as specified in Table 6.3.1.1-1 (3. 12-1), in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission, in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report, a description of the reasons for not conducting the program as required and the plans for preventing a recurrence.
b. With the level of radioactivity as the result of plant effluents in an environmental sampling medium at a specified location exceeding the reporting levels of Table 6.3. 1. 1-2 (3. 12-2) when averaged over any calendar quarter, in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, prepare and submit to the Commission within 30 days, pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9.2, a Special Report that identifies the cause(s) for exceeding the limit(s) and defines the corrective actions to be taken to reduce radioactive effluents so that the potential annual dose* to A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is less than the calendar year limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1.2, 6.2.2.2 and 6.2.2.3 (3. 11. 1.2, 3. 11.2.2, and

3. 11.2.3). When more than one of the radionuclides in Table 6.3. 1. 1-2 (3. 12-2) are detected in the sampling medium, this report shall be submitted if:
reporting level (1) reporting level (2) When radionuclides other than those in Table 6.3.1. 1-2 (3. 12-2) are detected and are the result of plant effluents, this report shall be submitted if the potential annual dose* to A MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is equal to or greater than the calendar year limits of Requirement for Operability 6.2.1.2, 6.2.2.2 and 6.2.2.3 (3. 11. 1.2, 3. 11.2.2 and
3. 11.2.3). This report is not required if the measured level of radioactivity was not the result of plant effluents; however, in such an event, the condition shall be reported and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
c~ With milk or fresh leafy vegetable samples unavailable from one or more of the sample locations required by Table 6.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1), identify locations for obtaining replacement samples and add them to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days.
The methodology and parameters used to estimate the potential annual dose to a HEHBER OF THE PUBLIC shall be indicated in this report.
149
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING RE UIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY Continued COMPENSATORY MEASURES: (Continued) The specific locations from which samples were unavailable may then be deleted from .the monitoring program. In lieu of a Licensee Event Report and pursuant to Technical Specification 6.9. l. 11, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples and identify the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCH reflecting the new location(s).
d. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.3. 1. 1. 1 (4. 12. 1) The radiological environmental monitoring samples shall be collected pursuant to Table 6.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1) from the specific locations given in the table and figure(s) in the ODCH,, and shall be analyzed pursuant to the requirements of Table 6.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1) and the detection capabilities required by Table 6.3. 1. 1. 1-1 (4. 12-1). 150
TABLE 6.3.. -1 3.12-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND/OR SAMPLE AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS'AMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS
1. DIRECT RADIATION 34 routine monitoring stations Quarterly. Gamma dose quarterly.
either with two or more dosimeters or with one instrument for measuring and recording dose rate continuously, placed as follows: An inner ring of stations, one in each meteorological sector in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY. An outer ring of stations, one in each of the meteorological sectors of NE, ENE, E, ESE, SE in the 6- to 9-km range from the site, and one in each of the meteorological sectors of N, NNE, SSE, S, SSW in the 9- to 12-km range from the site. The balance of the stations to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and 1 or 2 areas to serve'as control stations. UR PD
The number, media, frequency, and location of samples may vary from site to site. This table presents an C: Fl acceptable minimum program for a site at which each entry is applicable. Local site characteristics must be PR examined to determine if pathways not covered by this table may significantly contribute to an individual's dose and should be included in the sampling program. wQ g) ~
lO fO lD
TABLE 6.3. l. l.-l 3. 12-1 (Continued) RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* EXPOSURE PATHWAY OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES SAMPLING AND AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE AND SAMPLE COLLECTION FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS
2. AIRBORNE LOCATIONS'amples Radioiodine and from 5 locations: Continuous sampler Radioiodine Canister:
Particulates operation with sample I-131 analysis weekly. 1 sample from close to the 1 collection weekly, or SITE BOUNDARY location, having a more frequently if Particulate Sam ler: high calculated annual average required by dust Gross beta radioactivity ground-level D/Q. loading. analysis following filter change Three samples from close to the 3 Columbia River locations having the highest calculated D/Q. One sample from the vicinity of Gamma isotopic Surface'UMBER a community having the highest analysis'f composite (by loca-calculated annual average tion) quarterly. ground-level 0/Q. One sample from a control loca- period.'YPE tion, as for example 30-50 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction.
3. WATERBORNE

a. 1 sample upstream Composite sample over Gamma isotopic analysis" 1 sample downstream 1-month monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly.

b. Ground Samples only from 1 or if likely to 2
be affected.'ammatritiumisotopic'nd sources Quarterly. analysis quarterly.
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES TYPE AND FREQUENCY AND/OR SAMPLE AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS'AMPLING AND COLLECTION FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS
3. WATERBORNE (Continued)

c. Drinking One sample of each of 1 to 3 of Composite sam~le over I-131 analysis on each the nearest water supplies that 2-week period when composite when the dose could be affected by its I-131 analysis is calculated for the discharge. performed, monthly consumption of the water composite otherwise. is greater than 1 mrem per year."
One sample from a control Composite for gross beta location. and gamma isotopic analysis" monthly. Composite for tritium analysis quarterly.
d. Sediment from One sample from downstream area Semiannually. Gamma isotopic shoreline with existing or potential analysis'semiannually.
recreational value.
4. INGESTION

a. Milk Samples from milking animals in Semimonthly when Gamma isotopic and I-131 3 locations within 5 km distance animals are on analysis semi-monthly having the highest dose poten- pasture, monthly at when animals are on tial. If there are none, then 1 other times. pasture; monthly at other sample from milking animals in times.
each of 3 areas between 5-16 km distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year." 1 sample from milking animals at a control location, 30-50 km distant and in the least prevalent wind direction.
TABLE 6.3. 1. 1.-1 3. 12-1 (Continued) RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* EXPOSURE PATHWAY NUMBER OF REPRESENTATIVE SAMPLES AND/OR SAMPLE AND SAMPLE LOCATIONS'AMPLING COLLECTION FREQUENCY AND TYPE AND FREQUENCY OF ANALYSIS
4. INGESTION (Continued)

b. Fish and 1 sample of each of three Sample annually, isotopic Invertebrates recreationally important species unless an impact is analysis on edible (one anadromous and two resident) in vicinity of plant semiannually.'amma indicated, then portions.
discharge area. 1 sample of same species in areas not influenced by plant discharge.
c. Food Products 1 sample of each principal class At time of Gamma isotopic of food products from any area analyses'n edible that is irrigated by water in portion.
which liquid plant wastes have harvest.'onthly been discharged. Samples of 3 different kinds of during growing Gamma isotopic'nd broad leaf vegetation grown season. I-131 analysis. nearest each of two different offsite locations of highest predicted annual average ground-level 0/Q if milk sampling is not performed. 1 sample of each of the similar Monthly during growing Gamma isotopic'nd broad leaf vegetation grown 30- season. I-131 analysis. 50 km distant in the least prevalent wind direction if milk sampling is not performed.
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.3. 1. 1-1 3. 12-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS 'pecific parameters of distance and direction sector from the centerline of one reactor, and additional description where pertinent, shall be provided for each and every sample location in Table 6.3. l. 1-1 (3. 12-1) in a table and figure(s) in the ODCH. Refer to NUREG-0133, "Preparation of Radiological Effluent Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants," October 1978, and to Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. 'eviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to circumstances such as hazardous conditions, seasonal unavailability, and malfunction of automatic sampling equipment. If specimens are unobtainable due to sampling equipment malfunction, effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period. All deviations from the sampling schedule shall be documented in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. It is recognized that, at times, it may not be possible or practicable to continue to obtain samples of the media of choice at the most desired location or time. In these instances suitable alternative media and locations may be chosen for the particular pathway in question and appropriate substitutions made within 30 days in the radiological environmental monitoring program. In lieu of a Licensee Event Report, identify the cause of the unavailability of samples for that pathway and identify the new location(s) for obtaining replacement samples in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCN reflecting the new location(s). " One or more instruments, such as a pressurized ion chamber, for measuring and recording dose rate continuously may be used in place of, or in addition to, integrating dosimeters. For the purposes of this table, a thermolumines-cent dosimeter (TLD) is considered to be one phosphor card with multiple readout areas; a phosphor card in a packet is considered to be equivalent to two or more dosimeters. Film badges shall not be used as dosimeters for measuring direct radiation. (The number of direct radiation monitoring stations may be reduced according to geographical limitations. The frequency of analysis or readout for TLD systems will depend upon the characteristics of the specific system used and should be selected to obtain optimum dose information with minimal fading.) 'irborne particulate sample filters shall be analyzed for gross beta radio-activity 24 hours or more after sampling to allow for radon and thoron daughter decay. If gross beta activity in air particulate samples is greater than 10 times the yearly mean of control samples, gamma isotopic analysis shall be performed on the individual samples. 'amma isotopic analysis means the identification and quantification of gamma-emitting radionuclides that may be attributable to the effluents from the facility. 'he "upstream sample" shall be taken at a distance beyond significant influence of the discharge. The "downstream" sample shall be taken in an area beyond but near the mixing zone. 155
AMENDMENT NO. 11 AUGUST 1992 TABLE 6.3. 1. 1-1 3. 12-1 (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS ' composite sample is one in which the quantity (aliquot) of liquid is proportional to the quantity of flowing liquid and in which the method of sampling employed results in a specimen that is representative of the liquid flow. In this program composite sample aliquots shall be collected at time intervals that are very short (e.g., hourly) relative to the compositing period (e.g., monthly) in order to assure obtaining a representative sample.
\
'roundwater samples shall be taken when this source is tapped for drinking or irrigation purposes in areas where the hydraulic gradient or recharge properties are suitable for contamination. " The dose shall be calculated for the maximum organ and age group, using the methodology and parameters in the ODCM. 'f any of the analytical results for Columbia River fish samples are significantly higher than the results of the Snake River samples or the results of previous fish samples, sampling will be conducted semiannually. 'f each harvest occurs more than once a year, sampling shall be performed during discrete harvest. If harvest occurs continuously, sampling shall be monthly. Attention shall be paid to including samples of tuberous and root food products. 156
TABLE 6.3.1.1-2 3.12-2 REPORTING LEVELS FOR RADIOACTIVITY CONCENTRATIONS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLES WATER AIRBORNE PARTICULATE FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS ANALYSIS (pCi/L) OR GASES (pCi/m') (pCi/kg, wet) (pC'/L) (pCi/kg, wet) 2 x 10 H-3"'n-54 1 x 10 3 x 10 Fe-59 4 x 10' 1 x 10 Co-58 x 10 3x10 Co-60 3 x10' 1 x 10 Zn-65 x10' 2 x 10 Zr-Nb-95 x 10 I-131 2- 0.9 x 10' Cs-134 30 10 1 x 10 60 x 10 Cs-137 50 20 2x10 70 2 x 10 Ba-La-140 2 x 10 3 x 10' (1) For drinking water samples. The value given is the 40 CFR Part 141 value. If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 30,000 pCi/L may be used.
TABLE 6.3.1.1.1-1 4.12-1 DETECTION CAPABILITIES OR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS'OWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) WATER AIRBORNE PARTICULATE FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS SEDIMENT ANALYSIS (pCi/L) OR GASES (pCi/m') (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/L) (pCi/kg, wet) (pCi/kg, dry) Gross beta 1 x 10 H-3 2000* Mn-54 15 130 Fe-59 30 260 Co-58,60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-95 30 Nb-95 15 I-131 7 x 10' 60 Cs-134 15 x 10' 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 x 10 150 18 80 180 Ba-140 60 60 La-140 15 15 (*) If no drinking water pathway exists, a value of 3,000 pCi/L may be used.
AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.3. 1. 1. 1-1 (4. 12-1) (Continued) TABLE NOTATIONS 'his list does not mean that only these nuclides are to be considered. Other peaks that are identifiable, together with those of the above nuclides, shall also be analyzed and reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. " Required detection capabilities for thermoluminescent dosimeters used for environmental measurements shall be in accordance with the recommendations of Regulatory Guide 4. 13, except for specification regarding energy dependence. Correction factors shall be provided for energy ranges not meeting the energy dependence specification. 'he LLD is defined for purposes of these specifications, as the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will yield a net count, above system background, that will be detected with 95% probability with only 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal. For a particular measurement system, which may include radiochemical separation: 4.66sb LLD-E
' '.22 ' 'xp(-A~t)
Where: LLD is the "a priori" lower limit of detection as defined above, as picocuries per unit mass or volume, s, is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate, as counts per minute, E is the counting efficiency, as counts per disintegration, V is the sample size in units of mass or volume, 2.22 is the number of disintegrations per minute per picocurie, ' is the fractional radiochemical yield, when applicable, A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide, and zt for environmental samples is the elapsed time between sample collec-tion, or end of the sample collection period, and time of counting. Typical values of E, V, Y, and ~t should be used in the calculation. 159
AHENDHENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 TABLE 6.3. 1. 1. 1-1 4. 12-1 Continued TABLE NOTATIONS It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a priori (before the i l[f<<i i t)iiitf fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as i<< i ii Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidable small sample sizes, the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumstances may render these LLDs unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors shall be identified and described in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. 'LD for drinking water samples. If no drinking water pathway exists, the LLD of gamma isotopic analysis may be used. 160
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.3 (3/4.12)~ RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 6.3.2 (3/4. 12.2)
~ ~ ~ LAND USE CENSUS RE UIREHENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.3.2. 1 (3. 12.2) A Land Use Census shall be conducted and shall identify within a distance of 8 km (5 miles) the location in each of the 16 meteorological sectors of the nearest milk animal< the nearest residence and the nearest garden* of greater than 50 m'500 ft ) producing broad leaf vegetation.
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At all times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES: a 0 With a Land Use Census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than the values currently being calculated in Requirement for Operability 6.2.2.3. 1 (4. 11.2.3), in lieu of a Licensee Event Report, identify the new location(s) in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report.
b. With a Land Use Census identifying a location(s) that yields a calculated dose or dose commitment (via the same exposure pathway) 20% greater than at a location from which samples are currently being obtained in accordance with Requirement for Operability 6.3. 1. 1 (3. 12. 1), add the new location(s) to the radiological environmental monitoring program within 30 days. The sampling location(s), excluding the control station location having the, lowest calculated dose or dose commitment(s), via the same exposure pathway, may be deleted from this monitoring program after October 31 of the year in which this Land Use Census was conducted. In lieu of a Licensee Event Report, identify the new location(s) in the next Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report and also include in the report a revised figure(s) and table for the ODCH reflecting the new location(s).

c. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3 '.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.3.2. 1. 1 (4. 12.2) The Land Use Census shall be conducted during the growing season at least once per calendar year using that information that will pro-vide the best results, such as by a door-to-door survey, aerial survey, or by consulting local agriculture authorities. The results of the Land Use Census shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
Broad leaf vegetation sampling of at least three different kinds of vegeta-tion may be performed at the SITE BOUNDARY in each of two different direction sectors with the highest predicted D/gs in lieu of the garden census. Speci-fications for broad leaf vegetation sampling in Table 6.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1) shall be followed, including analysis of control samples.
161
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.3 (3/4.12)~ RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 6.3.3 (3/4. 12.3)
~ ~ ~ INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM RE UIREHENT FOR OPERABILITY 6.3.3. 1 (3. 12.3) Analyses shall be performed on all radioactive materials, supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program that has been approved by the Commission, that correspond to samples required by Table 6.3.1.1-1 (3.12-1).
RELEVANT CONDITIONS: At alT times. COMPENSATORY MEASURES:
'a ~ With analyses not being performed as required above, report the corrective actions taken to prevent a recurrence to the Commission in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.
b. The provisions of Technical Specifications 3.0.3 and 3.0.4 are not applicable.
PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS 6.3.3. 1. 1 (4. 12.3) The Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be described in the ODCH. A summary of the results obtained as part of the above required Interlaboratory Comparison Program shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report. h 162
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992
6. 4 f RADIOLOGICAL NV I RONHENTAL OPERATING/RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT REQUIREMENTS CONTROL OF CHANGES TO THE:
RADIOACTIVE LIQUID, GASEOUS, AND SOLID WASTE TREATHENT SYSTEMS 163
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.4.1
~ ~ ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT Routine Radiological Environmental Operating Reports covering the operation of ~ ~ ~
the unit during the previous calendar year shall be submitted prior to May 1 of each year. The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports shall include summaries, interpretations, and an analysis of trends of the results of the radiological environmental surveillance activities for the report period, including a comparison with preoperational studies, with operational controls as appropriate, and with previous environmental surveillance reports, and an assessment of the observed impacts of the plant operation of the environment. The reports shall also include the results of Land Use Censuses required by Requirement for Operability 6.3.2. 1 (3. 12.2). The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports'hall include the results of analysis of all radiological environmental samples and of all environmental radiation measurements taken during the period pursuant to the locations specified in the table and figures in the ODCM, as well as summa-rized and tabulated results of these analyses and measurements in the format of the table in the Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November 1979. In the event that some individual results are not available for inclusion with the report, the report shall be submitted noting and explaining the reasons for the missing results. The missing data shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report. The reports shall also include the following: a summary description of the radiological environmental monitoring program, at least two legible maps* covering all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and direc-tions from the centerline of the reactor; the results of license participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, required by Requirement for Opera-bility 6.3.3. 1 (3. 12.3); discussion of all deviations from the sampling schedule of Table 6.3. 1. 1-1 (3. 12-1); and discussion of all analyses in which the LLD required by Table 6.3. 1. l. 1-1 (4. 12-1) was not achievable.
One map shall cover stations near the SITE BOUNDARY; a second shall include the more distant stations.
164
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.4.2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT The Routine Radioactive Effluent Release Report covering the operation of the unit shall be submitted in accordance with 10 CFR 50.36a(a)(2). The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include a summary of the quan-tities of radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents and solid waste released from the unit as outlined in Regulatory Guide 1.21, "Measuring, Evaluating, and Reporting Radioactivity in Solid Wastes and Releases of Radioactive Materials in Liquid and Gaseous Effluents from Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 1, June 1974, with data summarized on a quarterly basis following the format of Appendix B thereof. The Radioactive Effluent Release Report to be submitted within 60 days after January 1 of each year shall include an annual summary of hourly meteorolog-ical data collected over the previous year. This annual summary may be either in the form of an hour-by-hour listing on magnetic tape of wind speed, wind direction, atmospheric stability, and precipitation (if measured), or in the form of joint frequency distributions of wind speed, wind direction, and atmospheric stability.* This same report shall include an assessment of the radiation doses due to the radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents released from the unit or station during the previous calendar year. This same report shall also include an assessment of the radiation doses from radioactive liquid and gaseous effluents to MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC due to their activities inside the SITE BOUNDARY (ODCM Figure 3-1) during the report period. All assumptions used in making these assessments, i.e., specific activity, expo-sure time and location, shall be included in these reports. The meteorolog-ical conditions concurrent with the time of release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents, as determined by sampling frequency and measurement, shall be used for determining the gaseous pathway doses. The assessment of radiation doses shall be performed in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCH). The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall also include once a year an assessment of radiation doses to the likely most exposed MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from reactor releases and other nearby uranium fuel cycle sources, including doses from primary effluent pathways and direct radiation, for the previous calendar year to show conformance with 40 CFR Part 190, Environmental Radiation Protection Standards for Nuclear Power Operation. Acceptable methods for calculating the dose contribution from liquid and gaseous effluents are given in Regulatory Guide 1. 109, Rev. 1, October 1977.
In lieu of submission with the first half year Radioactive Effluent Release Report, the licensee has the option of retaining this summary of required meteorological data on site in a file that shall be provided to the NRC upon request.
165
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.4.2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENT RELEASE REPORT (Continued) The Radioactive Effluent Release Report shall include the following informa-tion for each class of solid waste (as defined by 10 CFR Part 61) shipped offsite during the report period:
a. Container volume,

b. Total curie quantity (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate),

c. Principal radionuclides (specify whether determined by measurement or estimate),

d. Source of waste and processing employed (e.g., dewatered spent resin, compacted dry waste, evaporator bottoms),

e. Type of container (e.g., LSA, Type A, Type B, Large guantity), and

f. Solidification agent or absorbent (e.g., cement, urea formaldehyde).
The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include a list and description of unplanned releases from the site to UNRESTRICTED AREAS of radioactive materials in gaseous and liquid effluents made during the reporting period. The Radioactive Effluent Release Reports shall include any changes made during the reporting period to the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM (PCP) and to the OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL (ODCM), as well as a listing of new locations for dose calculations and/or environmental monitoring identified by the Land Use Census pursuant to Requirement for Operability 6.3.2.1 (3. 12.2). 6.4.3 MAJOR CHANGES TO RADIOACTIVE LI UID GASEOUS AND SOLID WASTE TREATMENT SYSTEMS* Licensee initiated major changes to the radioactive waste systems (liquid, gaseous, and solid):
'a ~ Shall be reported to the Commission in the Semiannual Radioactive Effluent Release Report for the period in which the evaluation was reviewed by the POC. The discussion of each change shall contain:
A summary of the evaluation that led to the determination that the change could be made in. accordance with 10 CFR 50.59;
2. Sufficient detailed information to totally support the reason for the change without benefit of additional or supplemental information;
Licensees may choose to submit the information called for in this specification as part of the annual FSAR update.
166
AHENDNENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992
3. A detailed description of the equipment, components, and processes involved and the interface with other plant systems; 4, An evaluation of the change, which shows the predicted releases of radioactive materials in liquid and gaseous effluents and/or quantity of solid waste that differ from those previously predicted in the license application and amendments thereto;

5. An evaluation of the change, which shows the expected maximum exposures to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in the UNRESTRICTED AREA and to the general population that differ from those previously estimated in the license application and amendments thereto;

6. A comparison of the predicted releases of radioactive mate-rials, in liquid and gaseous effluents and in solid waste, to the actual releases for the period prior to when the changes are to be made;

7. An estimate of the exposure to plant operating personnel as a result of the change; and

8. Documentation of the fact that the change was reviewed and found acceptable by the POC.

b. Shall become effective upon review and acceptance by the POC.
Licensees may choose to submit the information called for in this specification as part of the annual FSAR update.
167
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 6.5 BASES FOR RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS MONITORING REQUIREMENT FOR OPERABILITY 168
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6. 1 INSTRUMENTATION BASES MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION 86.1.1 (3/4.3.7.11) RADIOACTIVE LI UID EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive liquid effluent instrumentation. is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluents during actual or potential releases of liquid effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCH to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the require-ments of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. The purpose of tank level indicating devices is to assure the detec-tion and control of leaks that if not controlled could potentially result in the transport of radioactive materials to UNRESTRICTED AREAS. B6.1.2 (3/4.3.7.12) RADIOACTIVE GASEOUS EFFLUENT MONITORING INSTRUMENTATION The radioactive gaseous effluent instrumentation is provided to monitor and control, as applicable, the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents during actual or potential releases of gaseous effluents. The alarm/trip setpoints for these instruments shall be calculated and adjusted in accordance with the methodology and parameters in the ODCM to ensure that the alarm/trip will occur prior to exceeding the limits of 10 CFR Part 20. This instrumentation also includes provisions for monitoring the concentrations of potentially explosive gas mixtures in the WASTE GAS HOLDUP SYSTEM. The OPERABILITY and use of this instrumentation is consistent with the require-ments of General Design Criteria 60, 63, and 64 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. 169
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6.2 (3/4.11) RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES BN.E.I (6/N.ll) ~LI I EFFL ENTE B6.2. 1. 1 (3/4. 1. 1. 1) CONCENTRATION This Requirement for Operability is provided to ensure that the concentration of radioactive materials released in liquid waste effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be less than the concentration levels specified in 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 2. This limitation provides additional assurance that the levels of radioactive materials in bodies of water in UNRESTRICTED AREAS will result in exposures within (1) the Section II.A design objectives of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC and (2) the limits of . 10 CFR 20.106(e) to the population. The concentration limit for dissolved or entrained noble gases is b'ased upon the assumption that Xe-135 is the con-trolling radioisotope and its MPC in air (submersion) was converted to an equivalent concentration in water using the methods described in International Commission on Radiological Protection ( ICRP) Publication 2. This Requirement for Operability applies to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents from all reactor units at the site. The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in liquid waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD, and other detection limits can be found in HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually), Currie, L. A., "Limits for gualitative Detection and guantitative Determination - Application to Radiochemistry," Anal. Chem. 40 586-93 (1968), and Hartwell, J. K.,
"Detection Limits for Radioanalytical Counting Techniques," Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company Report ARH-SA-215 (June 1975).
B6.2.1.2 3 4.11.1.2 DOSE This Requirement for Operability is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.A, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Require- . ment for Operability implements the guides set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I. The COMPENSATORY MEASURES statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in liquid effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reason-ably achievable." Also, for fresh water sites with drinking water supplies that can be potentially affected by plant operations, there is reasonable assurance that the operation of the facility will not result in radionuclide concentrations in the finished drinking water that are in excess of the requirements of 40 CFR Part 141. The dose calculation methodology and parameters in the ODCM implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER - OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The equations specified in the ODCM for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive materials 170
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B .2.1.2 ( /4.11.1.2) ~tl E C i d in liquid effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1. 109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Man from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1. 113, "Estimating Aquatic Dispersion of Effluents from Accidental and Routine Reactor Releases for the Purpose of Implementing Appendix I," April 1977. This Requirement for Operability applies to the release of radioactive materials in liquid effluents from each reactor unit at the site. B6.2.1.3 (3/4.11. 1.3) LI UID RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the liquid radwaste treatment system ensures that this system will be available for use whenever liquid effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of this system be used, when specified, provides assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in liquid effluent will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." This Requirement for Operability implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50 and the design objective given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the liquid radwaste treatment system were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Section II.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for liquid effluents. This Requirement for Operability applies to the release of radioactive mate-rials in liquid effluents from each reactor un'it at the site. 86.2.2 (3/4. 11.2) GASEOUS EFFLUENTS B6.2.2. 1 (3/4. 11.2. 1) DOSE RATE This Requirement for Operability is provided to ensure that the dose at any time at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY from gaseous effluents from all units on the site will-be within the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 to UNRESTRICTED AREAS. The annual dose limits are the doses associated with the concentrations of 10 CFR Part 20, Appendix B, Table II, Column 1. These limits provide reasonable assurance that radioactive material discharged in gaseous effluents will not result in the exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC in an UNRESTRICTED AREA, either within or outside the SITE BOUNDARY, to annual average concentrations exceeding the limits specified in Appendix B, Table II of 10 CFR Part 20 (10 CFR 20. 106(b)). For MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC who may at times be within the SITE BOUNDARY, the occupancy of that MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will usually be sufficiently low to compensate for any increase in the atmospheric diffusion factor above that for the SITE BOUNDARY. Examples of calculations for such MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC, with the appropriate occupancy factors, is provided in the ODCM. The specified release rate limits restrict, at all times, the corresponding gamma and beta dose rates above background to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC at or beyond the SITE BOUNDARY to less than or equal to 500 mrems/year to the total body or to less than or equal to 3000 mrems/year to the skin. These release rate limits also restrict, at all times, the corresponding thyroid dose rate above background to a child via the inhalation pathway to less than or equal to 1500 mrems/year. 171
AMENDMENT NO. 10 JANUARY 1992 B6.2.2. 1 (3/4. 11.2. 1) DOSE RATE Continued This Requirement for Operability applies to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents from all reactor units at the site. The required detection capabilities for radioactive materials in gaseous waste samples are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). Detailed discussion of the LLD. and other detection limits can be found in HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually), Currie, L. A., "Limits for gualitative Detection and guantitative Determination - Application to Radio-chemistry," Anal. Chem. 40, 586-93 (1968), and Hartwell, J. K. , "Detection Limits for Radioanalytical Counting Techniques," Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company Report ARH-SA-215 (June 1975). B6.2.2.2 (3/4. 11.2.2) DOSE - NOBLE GASES This Requirement for Operability is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.B, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Require-ment for Operability implements the guides set forth in Section II.B of Appendix I. The COMPENSATORY MEASURES statements provide the required operating flexibility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive material in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reason-ably achievable." The PERIODIC TESTS AND INSPECTIONS requirements implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appro-priate pathways is unlikely to be substantially underestimated. The dose calculation methodology and parameters established in the ODCH for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of radioactive noble gases in gaseous effluents are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1. 109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Han from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1. 111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. The ODCH equations provided for determining the air doses at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions. This Requirement for Operability applies to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents from each reactor unit at the site. B6.2.2.3 (3/4.11.2.3) DOSE - IODINE- 131 IODINE- 133 TRITIUM AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM This Requirement for Operability is provided to implement the requirements of Sections II.C, III.A, and IV.A of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50. The Require-ment for Operability are the guides set forth in Section II.C of Appendix I. The COMPENSATORY MEASURES statements provide the required operating flexi-bility and at the same time implement the guides set forth in Section IV.A of Appendix I to assure that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents to UNRESTRICTED AREAS will be kept "as low as is reasonably achievable." The ODCH calculational methods specified in the Requirement for Operability implement the requirements in Section III.A of Appendix I that 172
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6.2.2.3 (3/4.11.2.3) DOSE - IODINE-131 IODINE-133 TRITIUM AND RADIONUCLIDES IN PARTICULATE FORM Continued conformance with the guides of Appendix I be shown by calculational procedures based on models and data, such that the actual exposure of a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC through appropriate pathways is unlikely to be substantially under-estimated. The ODCH calculational methodology and parameters for calculating the doses due to the actual release rates of the subject materials are consistent with the methodology provided in Regulatory Guide 1. 109, "Calculation of Annual Doses to Han from Routine Releases of Reactor Effluents for the Purpose of Evaluating Compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix I," Revision 1, October 1977 and Regulatory Guide 1. 111, "Methods for Estimating Atmospheric Transport and Dispersion of Gaseous Effluents in Routine Releases from Light-Water-Cooled Reactors," Revision 1, July 1977. These equations also provide for determining the actual doses based upon the historical average atmospheric conditions or concurrent meteorology. The release rate specifications for iodine-131, iodine-133, tritium, and radionuclides in particulate form with half-lives greater than 8 days are dependent upon the existing radionuclide pathways to man, in the areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY. The pathways that were examined in the development of these calculations were: (1) individual inhalation of airborne radionuclides, (2) deposition of radionuclides onto green leafy vegetation with subsequent consumption by man, (3) deposition onto grassy areas where milk animals and meat-producing animals graze with consumption of the milk and meat by man, and (4) deposition on the ground with subsequent exposure of man. This Requirement for Operability applies to the release of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents from each reactor unit at the site. 173
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6.2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES B6:2.2.4 and 6.2.2.5 (3/4. 11.2.4 and 3/4. 11.2.5) GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and VENTILATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM The OPERABILITY of the GASEOUS OFFGAS RADWASTE TREATMENT SYSTEM and the VENTI-LATION EXHAUST TREATMENT SYSTEM ensures that the systems will be available for use whenever gaseous effluents require treatment prior to release to the environment. The requirement that the appropriate portions of these systems be used, when specified, provides reasonable assurance that the releases of radioactive materials in gaseous effluents will be kept "as low as is reason-ably achievable." This Requirement for Operability implements the require-ments of 10 CFR 50.36a, General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50, and the design objectives given in Section II.D of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. The specified limits governing the use of appropriate portions of the systems were specified as a suitable fraction of the dose design objectives set forth in Sections II.B and II.C of Appendix I, 10 CFR Part 50, for gaseous effluents. B6.2.2.6 (3/4.11.2.8) VENTING OR PURGING This Requirement for Operability provides reasonable assurance that releases from drywell purging operations will not exceed the annual dose limits of 10 CFR Part 20 for unrestricted areas. 'B6.2.3.1 (3/4.11.3) SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This Requirement for Operability implements the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36a and General Design Criterion 60 of Appendix A to 10 CFR Part 50. The process parameters included in establishing the PROCESS CONTROL PROGRAM may include, but are not limited to, waste type, waste pH, waste/liquid/solidification agent/catalyst ratios, waste oil content, waste principal chemical constit-uents, mixing and curing times. 174
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6.2 RADIOACTIVE EFFLUENTS BASES B6.2.4.1 (3/4. 11.4) TOTAL DOSE This Requirement for Operability is provided to meet the dose limitations of 40 CFR Part 190 that have been incorporated into 10 CFR Part 20 by 46 FR 18525. The Requirement for Operability requires the preparation and submittal of a Special Report whenever. the calculated doses from plant generated radioactive effluents and direct radiation exceed 25 mrems to the total body or any organ, except the thyroid, which shall be limited to less than or equal to 75 mrems. For sites containing up to four reactors, it is highly unlikely that the resultant dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC will exceed the dose limits of 40 CFR Part 190 if the individual reactors remain within twice the dose design objectives of Appendix I, and if direct radiation doses from the reactor units and outside storage tanks are kept small. The Special Report will describe a course of action that should result in the limitation of the annual dose to a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC to within the 40 CFR Part 190 limits. For the purposes of the Special Report, it may be assumed that the dose commitment to the MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC from other uranium fuel cycle sources is negligible with the exception that dose contributions from other nuclear fuel cycle facilities at the same site or within a radius of 8 km must be considered. If the dose to any MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC is estimated to exceed the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190, the Special Report with a request for a variance (provided the release conditions resulting in violation of 40 CFR Part 190 have not already been corrected), in accordance with the provisions of 40 CFR 190. 11 and 10 CFR 20.405c, is considered to be a timely request and fulfills the requirements of 40 CFR Part 190 until NRC staff action is com-pleted. The variance only relates to the limits of 40 CFR Part 190, and does not apply in any way to the other requirements for dose limitation of 10 CFR Part 20, as addressed in Requirement for Operability 6.2. 1. 1 (3. 11. 1.)1 and 6.2.2. 1 (3. 11.2. 1). An individual is not considered a MEMBER OF THE PUBLIC during any period in which he/she is engaged in carrying out any operation that is part of the nuclear fuel cycle. 175
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6.3 (3/4.12) RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES B6.3.1.1 (3/4.12.1) MONITORING PROGRAM The radiological environmental monitoring program required by this Require-ment for Operability provides representative measurements of radiation and of radioactive materials in those exposure pathways and for those radionuclides that lead to the highest potential radiation exposures of MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC resulting from the plant operation. This monitoring program implements Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50 and thereby supplements the radiological effluent monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of radioactive materials and levels of radiation are not higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and the modeling 'of the environmental exposure pathways. Guidance for this monitoring program is provided by the, Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on Environ-mental Monitoring. The initially specified monitoring program will be effec-tive for at least the first 3 years of commercial operation. Following this period, program changes may be initiated on operational experience. The required detection capabilities for environmental sample analyses are tabulated in terms of the lower limits of detection (LLDs). The LLDs required by Table 6.3. 1. 1. 1-1 (4. 12-1) are considered optimum for routine environmental measurements in industrial laboratories. It should be recognized that the LLD is defined as an a griori (before the fact) limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as an a gosteriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement. Detailed discussion on the LLD, and other detection limits, can be found in HASL Procedures Manual, HASL-300 (revised annually), Currie, L. A., "Limits for Qualitative Detection and Quantitative Determination - Application to Radiochemistry," Anal. Chem. 40 586-93 (1968), and Hartwell, J. K.,
"Detection Limits for Radioanalytical Counting Techniques," Atlantic Richfield Hanford Company Report ARH-SA-215 (June 1975).
B6.3.2. 1 (3/4. 12.2) LAND USE CENSUS This Requirement for Operability is provided to ensure that changes in the use of areas at and beyond the SITE BOUNDARY are identified and that modifications to the radiological environmental monitoring program are made if required by the results of this census. The best information from the door-to-door survey, from aerial survey or from consulting with local agricultural authorities shall be used. This census satisfies the requirements of Section IV.B.3 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. Restricting the census to gardens of greater than 50 m'rovides assurance that significant exposure pathways via leafy vegetables will be identified and monitored since a garden of this size is the minimum required to produce the quantity (26 kg/year) of leafy vegetables assumed in Regulatory Guide 1. 109 for consumption by a child. To determine this minimum garden size, the following assumptions were made: (1) 20% of the garden was used for growing broad leaf vegetation (i.e., similar to lettuce and cabbage), and (2) a vegetation yield of 2 kg/m'. 176
AMENDMENT NO. 9 JANUARY 1992 B6.3 (3/4. 12) RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING BASES B6.3.3. 1 (3/4. 12.3) INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM The requirement for participation in an approved Interlaboratory Comparison Program is provided to ensure that independent checks on the precision and accuracy of the measurements of radioactive material in environmental sample matrices are performed as part of the quality assurance program for environ-mental monitoring in order to demonstrate that the results are valid for the purposes of Section IV.B.2 of Appendix I to 10 CFR Part 50. 177
'i I.}}

ML17289B193

Contents

Text

1.0 INTRODUCTION

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML17289B193

Text

1.0 INTRODUCTION

REFERENCE:

REFERENCE:

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search