ML061280013

Issuance of Amendments Inservice Testing Program (TAC Nos. MC8929 and MC8930)

ML061280013
Person / Time
Site:	Point Beach
Issue date:	06/08/2006
From:	Lyon C Plant Licensing Branch III-2
To:	Koehl D Nuclear Management Co
muniz A, ADRO/DORL/415-4044
Shared Package
ML061280014	List: ML061280013 ML061600117
References
TAC MC8929, TAC MC8930
Download: ML061280013 (11)

Text

June 8, 2006Mr. Dennis L. KoehlSite Vice President Point Beach Nuclear Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241-9516

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OFAMENDMENTS RE: INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NOS. MC8929 AND MC8930)

Dear Mr. Koehl:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 222 to Renewed Facility OperatingLicense No. DPR-24 and Amendment No. 228 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-27 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the technical specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 12, 2004, as supplemented by letters dated January 30 and March 6, 2006.Your November 12, 2004, letter proposed amendments that would revise TS 5.5.7, "InserviceTesting Program," and TS 5.5.8, "Steam Generator Tube Surveillance Program," to updatereferences to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code and certain periodicities forinservice testing activities consistent with the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations, Section 50.55a. However, by letter dated January 30, 2006, you withdrew theproposed revision to TS 5.5.8. A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will beincluded in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Carl F. Lyon, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 222 to DPR-24

2. Amendment No. 228 to DPR-27

3. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next page June 8, 2006Mr. Dennis L. KoehlSite Vice President Point Beach Nuclear Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241-9516

SUBJECT:

POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2 - ISSUANCE OFAMENDMENTS RE: INSERVICE TESTING PROGRAM (TAC NOS. MC8929 AND MC8930)

Dear Mr. Koehl:

The Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 222 to Renewed Facility OperatingLicense No. DPR-24 and Amendment No. 228 to Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-27 for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, respectively. The amendments consist of changes to the technical specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated November 12, 2004, as supplemented by letters dated January 30 and March 6, 2006.Your November 12, 2004, letter proposed amendments that would revise TS 5.5.7, "InserviceTesting Program," and TS 5.5.8, "Steam Generator Tube Surveillance Program," to updatereferences to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers Code and certain periodicities forinservice testing activities consistent with the requirements of Title 10 of the Code of FederalRegulations, Section 50.55a. However, by letter dated January 30, 2006, you withdrew theproposed revision to TS 5.5.8. A copy of our related safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will beincluded in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.Sincerely,/RA/Carl F. Lyon, Project ManagerPlant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-266 and 50-301

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 222 to DPR-24

2. Amendment No. 228 to DPR-27

3. Safety Evaluationcc w/encls: See next pageDISTRIBUTION

PUBLICLPL3-1 R/F RidsOgcRpRidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsNrrDorlDprRidsNrrDorlLpl3-1GHill (4)RidsNrrDirsItsb RidsNrrLADClarkeRidsRgn3MailCenterRidsNrrPMFLyonAMuniz PHearn, DIRS**Previously concurred

Package: ML061280014 - Amendment: ML061280013 - TS: ML061600117*No major changes to SE dated 4/11/06.OFFICENRR/LPL3-1/PENRR/LPL3-1/PMNRR/LPL3-1/LADIRS/ITSB OGCNRR/LPL3-1/BCNAMEAMuniz**FLyon:rsaDClarke**TBoyce*AHodgdon**LRaghavanDATE5/26/066/6/065/23/064/11/066/6/066/6/06 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLCDOCKET NO. 50-266POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 1AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 222 License No. DPR-241.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC(the licensee), dated November 12, 2004, as supplemented by letters dated January 30 and March 6, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 4.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-24 is hereby amended to read as follows:B.Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revisedthrough Amendment No. 222, are hereby incorporated in the renewed operating license. NMC shall operate the facility in accordance with TechnicalSpecifications.3.This license amendment is effective as of the date of issuance and shall beimplemented within 45 days of the date of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/L. Raghavan, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of issuance: June 8, 2006 NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLCDOCKET NO. 50-301POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNIT 2AMENDMENT TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSEAmendment No. 228 License No. DPR-271.The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:A.The application for amendment by Nuclear Management Company, LLC(the licensee), dated November 12, 2004, as supplemented by letters dated January 30 and March 6, 2006, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I;B.The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of theAct, and the rules and regulations of the Commission;C.There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by thisamendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations;D.The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense andsecurity or to the health and safety of the public; andE.The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of theCommission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied. 2.Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications asindicated in the attachment to this license amendment, and paragraph 4.B of Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-24 is hereby amended to read as follows:B.Technical SpecificationsThe Technical Specifications contained in Appendices A and B, as revisedthrough Amendment No. 228, are hereby incorporated in the renewed operating license. NMC shall operate the facility in accordance with TechnicalSpecifications.3.This license amendment is effective as of the date of issuance and shall beimplemented within 45 days of the date of issuance.FOR THE NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION/RA/L. Raghavan, ChiefPlant Licensing Branch III-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Technical Specifications Date of issuance: June 8, 2006 ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 222TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-24AND LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 228TO RENEWED FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-27DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-301Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License and Appendix A TechnicalSpecifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change. REMOVEINSERTUnit 1 license page 3Unit 1 license page 3 Unit 2 license page 3Unit 2 license page 3 5.5-6 5.5-6 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONRELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 222 TO RENEWED FACILITYOPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-24AND AMENDMENT NO. 228 TO RENEWED FACILITYOPERATING LICENSE NO. DPR-27NUCLEAR MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLCPOINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT, UNITS 1 AND 2DOCKET NOS. 50-266 AND 50-30

11.0 INTRODUCTION

By letter to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC, the Commission) dated November 12, 2004, as supplemented by letters dated January 30 and March 6, 2006, the Nuclear Management Company, LLC (the licensee), requested changes to the technical specifications (TSs) for the Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 (Point Beach).The proposed changes would revise the Point Beach TS to incorporate administrative changesto TS 5.5.7, "Inservice Testing Program" and TS 5.5.8, "Steam Generator (SG) TubeSurveillance Program" in order to update references to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Code. The licensee's supplement dated January 30, 2006, withdrew theproposed revision to TS 5.5.8. The January 30 and March 6, 2006, supplements containedclarifying information which did not change the staff's initial proposed finding of no significant hazards consideration, which was published in the Federal Register on January 17, 2006 (71 FR 2592).Specifically, the licensee proposes to (1) revise TS 5.5.7.a and TS 5.5.7.c to refer to the ASMEcode for Operation and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plants (OM Code) instead of Section XIof the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, (2) redefine the terms used in TS 5.5.7.a forperiodicities to conform to the OM Code and NUREG-1482, Revision 1, "Guidelines forInservice Testing at Nuclear Power Plants," and (3) revise TS 5.5.7.b to read:The provisions of SR 3.0.2 are applicable to the above required Frequencies andother normal and accelerated Frequencies, that do not exceed two years, specified in the Inservice Testing Program for performing inservice testing activities; instead of:The provisions of SR 3.0.2 are applicable to the above required Frequencies forperforming inservice testing activities;

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

Section 182a of the Atomic Energy Act (the Act) requires applicants for nuclear power plantoperating licenses to include technical TSs as part of the license. These TSs are derived from the plant safety analyses.The NRC staff reviewed the proposed changes for compliance with Title 10 of the Code ofFederal Regulations (10 CFR) Section 50.36, "Technical Specifications," and consistency withthe precedent as established in NUREG-1431, "Standard Technical Specifications [STS],Westinghouse Plants." In general, licensees cannot justify TS changes solely on the basis of adopting the model standard technical specification. To ensure this, the NRC staff makes adetermination that the proposed changes maintain adequate safety. Changes that result inrelaxation (less restrictive condition) of current TS requirements require detailed justification.In general, there are two classes of changes to TSs: (1) changes needed to reflect revisions tothe design basis (TSs are derived from the plant safety analyses, which are part of the design basis), and (2) voluntary changes to take advantage of industry and NRC evolutions in policyand guidance affecting the required content and preferred format of TSs over time. The proposed amendments are administrative changes that reflect evolutions in policy and guidance.Licensees may revise the TSs to adopt improved STS format and content provided that plant-specific review supports a finding of continued adequate safety because: (1) the change is editorial, administrative or provides clarification (i.e., no requirements are materially altered),

(2) the change is more restrictive than the licensee's current requirement, or (3) the change is less restrictive than the licensee's current requirement, but nonetheless still affords adequateassurance of safety when judged against current regulatory standards. The detailed application of this general framework, and additional specialized guidance, are discussed in Section 3.0 inthe context of specific proposed changes.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The licensee proposes to make changes to the TSs that are editorial or administrative in natureor provide clarification. The NRC staff reviewed the proposed changes to determine that theydid not alter the TS requirements.The licensee proposed TS changes that are consistent with Technical Specification Task Force(TSTF)-479, Rev. 0, "Changes to Reflect Revision of 10 CFR 50.55a." TSTF-479 revised the STS by adopting ASME Code and certain associated periodicities for inservice testing activities consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a, "Codes and standards." TSTF-479 clarified the description of the test intervals in STS 5.5.8 for valves with intervals of 2 years or less to include intervals derived from risk-informed evaluations. STS 5.5.8 corresponds to Point Beach TS 5.5.7. Since the clarification to STS 5.5.8 did not affect the maximum 2 year valve testinterval in STS 5.5.8, TSTF-479 does not alter the STS requirements. TSTF-479 also updates references to the ASME code from Section XI of the ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code tothe ASME OM Code, consistent with the requirements of 10 CFR 50.55a. The licensee'srevision adopts TSTF-479 changes into TS 5.5.7 with additional wording confirming that the valve test interval extension in the inservice inspection program applies only to valves with test intervals of 2 years or less.The NRC staff concludes that the licensee's proposed changes are acceptable since they areadministrative, do not alter the Point Beach TS requirements, and conform to the requirementsof 10 CFR 50.55a.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Wisconsin State official was notified ofthe proposed issuance of the amendments. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

These amendments change an administrative requirement. Accordingly, these amendmentsmeet the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(10). Pursuantto 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need to be prepared in connection with the issuance of these amendments.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that (1) there isreasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered byoperation in the proposed manner, (2) such activities will be conducted in compliance with theCommission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendments will not be inimical to thecommon defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.Principal Contributor: P. Hearn Date: June 8, 2006 Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 cc:

Jonathan Rogoff, EsquireVice President, Counsel & Secretary Nuclear Management Company, LLC 700 First Street Hudson, WI 54016Mr. F. D. KuesterPresident & Chief Executive Officer WE Generation 231 West Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53201Regulatory Affairs ManagerPoint Beach Nuclear Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241Mr. Ken DuveneckTown Chairman Town of Two Creeks 13017 State Highway 42 Mishicot, WI 54228ChairmanPublic Service Commission of Wisconsin P.O. Box 7854 Madison, WI 53707-7854Regional Administrator, Region IIIU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 210 2443 Warrenville RoadLisle, IL 60532-4351Resident Inspector's OfficeU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 6612 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241Mr. Jeffery KitsembelElectric Division Public Service Commission of Wisconsin P.O. Box 7854 Madison, WI 53707-7854Nuclear Asset ManagerWisconsin Electric Power Company 231 West Michigan Street Milwaukee, WI 53201Michael B. SellmanPresident and Chief Executive Officer Nuclear Management Company, LLC 700 First Street Hudson, MI 54016Douglas E. CooperSenior Vice President - Group Operations Palisades Nuclear Plant Nuclear Management Company, LLC 27780 Blue Star Memorial Highway Covert, MI 49043Site Director of OperationsNuclear Management Company, LLC 6610 Nuclear Road Two Rivers, WI 54241