ML14071A072

Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562

ML14071A072
Person / Time
Site:	Farley
Issue date:	02/20/2014
From:	Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NL-14-0249
Download: ML14071A072 (41)

Text

ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of/ 5 1 JvpStatus: YO NEI UFISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R17BO02 Equip. Class' IEquipment Description MCC 10Location:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 72 OManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[2/N]of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

~~~&E ~ r fA.T, A e6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YECN/NO U- N/AOY[2'/N0 UO N/AOY4 ND U] N/AOYI[ NO U[ N/AQY[d NO U'-Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 351 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F -F7Sheet 2 of 2I¢' -10Status: Yo N[O U[-Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)EquipmentiDNo.

QIREf7fe2 Equip. iEquipment Description MCC 18Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8, Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Yd ND UD N/ADY[2fANO U- N/AOYr/ND UD N/ADY4ND UOOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ND UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

0 mnL~dtoa ae may be added as necessary) rL/ I 4vQ~*Jt~ ML~,(T~.Yu'AO Date: 7/to ,~Evaluated by:.Date: 1/1,P11 viv)I (K~)11/t01tVzPage 352 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 3 of:;3 , tkolt 90Status: Yj'NL-] UF'I]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR178002 Equip.Equipment Description MCC 1BPhotographs I97To ppVE=P E-W JAOVe MjMtAt~E:10 TfH.E M~cC LQC-ATACI)0k AFth MrC C~)~ ~T C~Note:~ ~/ jn,T* dP WF~C 00J THE2ýT~ W~4--TI I iEAOT A~J AT Mep- 1Note:Note:Note:Page 353 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 354 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 355 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 356 of 562 NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 357 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.01\-,Jr-'% esmPage 358 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 359 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-'3-JPage 360 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS "T--I -V.nNO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 361 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0-3-'t- N -. ,Page 362 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 363 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0TI..,-x ýZ-'Page 364 of 562 nki 11 AATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. lalNG io4-mr I-U0, vr'ru..' 'Page 365 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0,%Xshe ofStatus: Y9 NEI U[0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIR178507-A Equip. ClassýEquipment Description MCC INLocation:

Bldg. DIESEl Floor El. 155 Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchorase

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?NUI"2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Y9'Nr1 UlI N/ADYjN3UQ N/ADJYE'ND U-] N/AIDYO ND UD N/AlfY& NO UlEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 366 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0rC ~Status: uE%ýINJ USeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 0IR17B507-A Equip. Class,Equipment Description MCC 1NInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Yd"NQ U N/AC8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, UI] N/AC]and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?Y[2/NE3 UC] N/AC]10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could UCadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

Plwc-~-, -z-t [IEvaluated'

-1161- Iq a" M frw"014v.

Page 367 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0.4Page 368 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0r-I I i .-- , I IPage 369 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Sheet 1 ofsfx'Staturs Y~dNI U1'N]uEquipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class'-2Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCHLocation:

Bldg. AUIY U1ARY Floor E. ,/j4.. Room, AreaManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Auchorae1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N§1"1of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

YNF'<0 U1) N/ADYe"NO Ul- N/AQY&NO UID N/ArYO NO U- N/AID "Yrb/NO 1)0IEnter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 370 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class, 2Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCHCALSheeat ofStatus: YE N[-] U[']Interaction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

YIV<DOUEJ N/ACJ8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[tNF[] U--1 N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yb/ND U0- N/AQ1;C'e t-T& r*i V-V POT~ or'4Q -JjC A I r a-XC Z t10.-'Baed on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free UDC of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

YE4<cD UMComments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

AJVDVfEvaluated by: .... k " * "( Y~yk~( x~1a <Z/Date: X -zo'Z-Page 371 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 372 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 373 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Seismic Walkcdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R168031 Equip. Class,NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet ofStatus:

UEJo .Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOXLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 332Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anehoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[C NEý 'of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?U['U N/AD*/N- U" N/AOY&<CJ UEJ N/AQYO1 Nil UC NI5",Y1140$F UQ]I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 374 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0She~t 2 ofV" 1Status: Yt NEI UL]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. OIR18B031 Equip. Class2Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOXInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

Y3,41( UD N/AD8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[frlND UD N/ADand masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y .-'ND- UD N/ADCOt,roo T A 00 5-5 / v,ý ,.-.fs,-w,

,.,,,Jj' t- k.,,W .t.. IT-s ,,'C.-40,, W_ -T- O's- hct ....5N1C tktkVC 1& -i5j --ýCL,-0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free UDof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that couldadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Y&ýN[]UD]

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

/V 6 A.>;Evaluated by:G1 -1 04 1 DX-ýfUAýý Date: V.z /.r. u4¶i4 A_________

Page 375 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 376 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 377 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0F~I- r14Sheet I of 3Status: YEý N[] Ur"ISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR18B035 Equip. Class' 14Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOXLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area -3/Z Ai)Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

I ,Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchorage

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y8-N"of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

sewvALdd.. 3 -Z-o-q 52. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Y[tA ur- N/A-1U0 N/A]ýýNO U!] N/AEYt< NO UI] N/AD-5& po-- &e p rd" , A,4cA d-- ýt --r Av c, e6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y N0"] U!]potentially adverse seismic conditions?

I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 378 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 Of 3Status: 71NO] U0[Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. O1R18B035 Equip. Class, 14Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOXInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YA6NO- U["3 N/AD316N/NH UEJ N/ADYS.-N)D UD] N/AD" ~U0Other Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý NQ UDadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4 .02Evaluated by: 77 L.JA .Hg,"Date: 9,/o. 2_0/12ci. tOL'Page 379 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 380 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0SSheet 1 of-dýStatus: YMN-3 U-]Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. Q1R21BOO1A Equip. Class, 14Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BOXLocation:

Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO Nof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation?

(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free ofpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

Yid NOI Ur N/AQY,0 NO UO N/AQYy"NO UO N/AOYO NO UO N/APfY)1No UQIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 381 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 2 ofStatus: NI- UISeismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. 01R21BOO1A Equip. Class,Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BoxInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?Y)1NO UO N/AQY) NO UI N/AOY NEI U= N/AOYf ND UIOther Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y -NO U-Iadversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

CommentS (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

2. ZAPEvaluated byEvaluated byDaeclý L-1 LLD(YDate:Page 382 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 383 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS

&NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 384 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 385 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Sheet 1 of " t L ',Status: Y[: f NO uf1Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR21EOO9C Equip. Class' 14Equipment Description INVERTER IC ,,W.., ..Location:

Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. # /it/ Room, Area ! p/ tManufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)

Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on theSWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments andfindings.

Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.

Anchoraee

1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item oneof the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?

YM NU2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware?

3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surfaceoxidation?

4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors?/YE/INC UO N/ACY[WN" U- N/AC/U NO UC N/AC5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? NC UC(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% forwhich an anchorage configuration verification is required.)

Vel~ie'l~b

£!OIIIOLVAANWOO t c *QHA2CtoMe FC7z5WS TOP-Q2IR2 w 9C " C,,IIZZI eO9A7 'PAT&V 'W/24/-9*

(N07)6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y60t"No UCpotentially adverse seismic conditions?

N/ACIEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.

Page 386 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0r, 1 1 6? ý)ý-flSheet 2 off ;jrP1Status: YiA' N[] UrI] J11dF7Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)Equipment ID No. QIR21EO09C Equip. Class, 14Equipment Description INVERTER ICInteraction Effects7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures?

8. Are overhead equipment, distribution

systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?

9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage?10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment freeof potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?YIN" UEJ N/ACY[V/NO U"I N/AlY[VN-I UCI N/AClY[4/N'- UCIOther Adverse Conditions

11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS(ND Ulladversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?

Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)

MOVEEvaluated by:.RWPMKl5fi &J/ L/ 'IDate: __ __ __ __9 ,//Ox-I. 70AI/- 1 1 -IPage 387 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 388 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 389 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0Page 390 of 562 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0aII~1Page 391 of 562