ML20065J026: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot change)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:}}
{{#Wiki_filter:MANHATTAN COLLEGE PARKWAY        MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Man.. ha@an                RIVERDALE. NEW YORK 10471 (212) 92H145 September 28, 1982 l c7 {
Mr. Harold Bernard, Acting Branch Chief Standardization and Special Products Branch Division of Licensing United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.          20555 re:    Procedure for Renewal of Research Reactor Facility License
 
==Dear Mr. Bernard:==
 
You have assisted us in the past on licensing
:I        que stions.      We wonder if you could provide us with some guidance on the proper procedure for renewal of our 10 year Reactor Facility License No. R-94 which expires on September 30, 1983                  As this is a college-based research and instructional facility licensed for only O. I watt, we trust that the renewal procedure is much less complicated than for a much larger facility.          Thank you in advance for your help.
Very truly yours,
                                                          % e JL L h Ronald S. Kane Reactor Administrator RSK/w Ch salooso341 sao9as PDR ADOCK 05000199 P
P.DR      -}}

Latest revision as of 07:58, 6 January 2021

Requests Guidance on Procedure for Renewal of 10-yr License R-94,which Expires on 830930
ML20065J026
Person / Time
Site: 05000199
Issue date: 09/28/1982
From: Kane R
MANHATTAN COLLEGE, RIVERDALE, NY
To: Bernard H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8210050341
Download: ML20065J026 (1)


Text

MANHATTAN COLLEGE PARKWAY MECHANICAL ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Man.. ha@an RIVERDALE. NEW YORK 10471 (212) 92H145 September 28, 1982 l c7 {

Mr. Harold Bernard, Acting Branch Chief Standardization and Special Products Branch Division of Licensing United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 re: Procedure for Renewal of Research Reactor Facility License

Dear Mr. Bernard:

You have assisted us in the past on licensing

I que stions. We wonder if you could provide us with some guidance on the proper procedure for renewal of our 10 year Reactor Facility License No. R-94 which expires on September 30, 1983 As this is a college-based research and instructional facility licensed for only O. I watt, we trust that the renewal procedure is much less complicated than for a much larger facility. Thank you in advance for your help.

Very truly yours,

% e JL L h Ronald S. Kane Reactor Administrator RSK/w Ch salooso341 sao9as PDR ADOCK 05000199 P

P.DR -