ML20203M901

Rev 2 to Project Procedure WP-03, Evaluation & Analysis of Employee Concerns

ML20203M901
Person / Time
Site:	Sequoyah
Issue date:	02/03/1986
From:	TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20203M897	List: ML20203M895 ML20203M901 ML20203M904 ML20203M909 ML20203M912 ML20203M916 ML20203M924 ML20203M929 ML20203M931 ML20203M936 ML20203M941 ML20203M944
References
WP-03, WP-3, NUDOCS 8609050150
Download: ML20203M901 (9)

Text

l

', ' a _- N, r

~

F .

q ,,

DING PRCLECT PRcIcT PRnrmsE N O. W-03 i .:. ,s. c. r

===m TITLE: EVALUATION ?. ANALYSIS OF E:@LOYEE CONCERNS ag, i

9 REVISION RO R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 DATE 2/3/86 -

PREPARED (

JQ JQ Jg APPROVED g Q g APPROVED yhg y g U-8609050150 860903 PDR ADOCK 05000327

• P PDR

. ,l

~'; -

6 OFFICE OF ENGINEERING' .

WELDING PROJECT C PROJECT MANUAL _ .

REVISION 2 PROJECT PROCEDURES WP-03 EVALUATION & ANALYSIS OF EMPLOYEE CONCERNS

1. - PURPOSE This procedure establishes the method for evaluating, condensing, and determining the relevancy of welding-related Employee Concerns.

This procedure also describes the evaluation methods for addressing

Employee Concerns. , , _

2. SCOPE ,

All Employee Concerns furnished to the Welding Project (WP) are included in the scope of this document. Activities addressed: -- ,

2.1 Review and grouping to determine specific problems and issues in an effort i C to condense these concerns.

i 2.2 Development of trends for the overall TVA welding pro' gram. '

2.3 Engineering evaluation of each concett to determine relevancy to program,

! procedures, or hardware.

4 2.4 Those Employee Concerns determined to be applicable to Sequoyah Nuclear Plant (SQN) shall have Evaluttion Reports initiated as described in this procedure. -

3. DISCUSSION The Evaluation Report results represent engineering evaluations of potential generic problem issues. The evaluation of these issues are to be accomplished by review and analysis of:

1. Programs, procedures, and polices.

2

2. The review of applicable Unplementation audit elenents.

3. The review of applicable independent reinspection results.

4. kEFERENCES ,

Employee Concerns Task Group (ECTG) Program Manual

(

5. DEFINITIONS i

None a

> e OFFICE OF ENGINEERING WELDING PROJECT C PROJECT MANUAL _.

REVISION 2

6. RESPONSIBILITIES OC Project Engineer is responsible for all activities within the scope of this procedure.

7. PROCEDURE 7.1 Review and categorize each Employee Concern "K-Form" into specific problen and disposition categories assuming each concern is a statement of f act.

7.2 Assimilate these categorizations into the WP data base for overall  ;

analysis and evaluation of the welding program.

7.3 Evaluate each Employee Concern to determine if it is relevant to program, _ _

procedures, or hardware. _.

7.3.1 Employee Concerns which are not found relevant to program, procedures, or hardware will not require further reviews or action by WP.- A statement of justification will be prepared for each Employee Concern determined to be in this category. ,

7.3.2 Employee Concerns found to be relevant to program, procedures, or hardware vill be assimilated and filed as follevs for further action by WP: .

7.3.2.1 Program 7.3.2.1.1 Welding 7.3.2.1.2 Overall QA 7.3.2.2 Procedures 7.3.2.2.1 Electrode Control 7.3.2.2.2 Inspection 7.3.2.2.3 Welder Training 7.3.2.2.4 Inspector Training 7.3.2.2.5 Process Control 7.3.2.2.6 Reinspection Criterion 7.3.2.2.7 Others as Necessary WP3.0 Page 2 of 4

a: .

0FYICE OF ENGINEERING WELDING PROJECT .

PROJECT MANUAL REVISION 2 i

i 7.3.2.3 Hardware systems, and components which are identified.

7.3.2.3.1 Specific equipment, -

and components which are not specifically 7.3.2.3.2 Equipment, systems, identified.

7.3.3 Employee Concerns will also be grouped by specific problem areas to condense them into specific families of problems. o4 h an ? 1 Evaluation Reports for Employees Concerns which apply to SQN shall be i' 7.4 prepared as follows:

7.4.1 Each Employee Concern (EC) or group of ECs will be evaluated by WP is l~~ .

personnel individually assuming each statement made by the concern valid observation.

7.4.2 These statements will be assimilated or grouped, if possible l . into specific issues and analyzed both individually and collective y.co .

develop issues.

Each issue will be analyzed against the requirements of the applicableT C 7.4.3 QA program which could affect the issue.

in relation to policies, reinspections, audits, NSRS/QTC impact of the issue on the quality of the plant.

to the issue will be used to 7.4.4 The results of the information revelant develop a report which is to include the following: ,

Statement of scope at evaluation report (list all Emhloyee Concerns 7.4.4.1 applicable).

Statement of issue (s) addressed by the concern (s).

7.4.4.2 7.4.4.3 Statement of substantiation or nonsubstantiation.

7.4.4.4 Statement of compliance to program.

7.4.4.5 Statement of suitability for service.

7.4.4.6 Indication of need for reinspection.

7.4.4.7 Justification for substantiation or nonsubstantiation.

7.4.4.8 Justification for suitability for service evaluation.

• - 7.4.4.9 Recommendation for closure or corrective action.

Page 3 of 4 WP3.0

. ,. , . N' OFFICE OF ENGINEERING -

WELDING PROJECT C PROJECT MANUAL REVISION 2 7.4.4.10 closure statement.

7.5 The report will be initiated and checked by WP personnel and will receive a QA review by the WP DQA representative.

7.6 Completed reports will be forwarded from the Welding Project Manager to the Welding Task Group Manager for review and processing in accordance with the Employee Concerns Task Group Program Manual.

8. DOCUMENTATION Employee Concerns Evaluation Reports shall be maintained in acecrdance with the Employee Concerns Task Group Program Manual

9. ATTACHMENTS Attachment A - Cover Sheet for fer' Employee Concern Report ._

4 f

s-L.

L WP3.0 Page 4 of 4

7-s l ,. ~

3;-

~

) 0FFICE OF ENGINEERING '

WELDING PROJECT PROJECT MANUAL REVISION 2 Attachment A l EMPLOYEE CONCERN REPORT Page 1 of 1 I. Concern Number (s) considered _

II. Issue involved

~

III. Substantiated or nonsubstantiated . . . .

IV.

Eff ect on hardware / program Y. Justify iY above _

VI. Reconsmendations/ corrective action _ .

Y__ N__

Reinspection neededt VII.

VIII. Closure Report Analysis L

WP3.0

s.

Attachment 2' Page 1 of 3 SEQUOYAH (GENERIC)

WEI.D PROJECT EMPLOYEE ECTG REPORT NUMBER CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE ACTION WP-04-SQN IN-85-406-003 Availability of Wald Not substantiated. No

. IN-85-134-002 Inspection Tools action required.

IM-85-007-001 ,

CLOSED *

• WP-05-SQN IN-85-339-005 Ouct Installation and Substantiated as it re-PH-85-012-XO3 Documentation lates to the duct being too close to walls to

( ,

weld and as to welding l and attendant inspection from the in-side of the duct (IN-85-339-005).

• Not substantiated as to

, not having a program

( P H -8 5-012-X O 3 ) . No .

hardward deficiencies exist.' CLOSE0 -

WP-06-SQN IN-85-476-004 Training and Certification Not substantiated by WP.

IN-85-981-001 of Construction Wolding These concerns closed WI-85-081-007 Inspectors based on the existing WI-85-041-002 program and Bechtel SQN Implementation Audi,ts, Key Elements 6.0, 7.0, 8.0, 11.0, and 17.0.

CLOSE0 WP-07-SQN IN-85-706-001 Walder Training Program For Not substantiated. -

XX-85-045-001 Construction and Nuclear These concerns closed .

Operations based on the Welder Qualification Program, Welder Training Program, and Bochtel SQN Implementation Audit, Ney Elements 3.0, 4.0,

, and 5.0. CLOSED

e Att:chment 2 Page 2 of 3 SEQUOYAH (GENERIC)

WELD PROJECT EMPLOYEE ECTG REPORT NUMBER CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE ACTION 4

WP-09-SQN IM-8k-406-002 Weld Inspection Criteria Used Not substantiated.

, For SQN Construction Closed based on the

• existing program and

~

, .Bechtel SQN Implementation Audit.

. Key Element 10.0. CLOSED WP-10-SQN WI-8G-030-010 SQN Implementation of Weld Substantiated. This Program Study QAE-80-2 study was not applicable to SQN. CLOSED WP-11-SQN IN-85-282-002 Surface Grinding of Wolds Not substantiated.

IN-85-271-001 Grinding is an

, acceptable practice.

CLOSED WP-13-SQN IN-85-247-002 Suitability of Welding Equip- Not substantiated.

IN-85-303-001 ment For Construction and Review indicates equip-4 Modification Welding ment is suitable. The Activities Reinspection did not identify problems due to welding equipment.

,, CLOSED

. ~ _ _

WP-16-SQN .SQM-5-001-001 Performance of Preweld Substantiated non-

,$QM-5-001-002 . Inspections compliance by Nuclear W8M-5-001-001 ', . Operations.with ANSI

~~

BEM-5-001-001 Note'that concern N45.2.5 Surveillance BEM-5-001-002 SQM-5-001-002 is a SQN* Program for Structural 0FM-5-001-002 specific concern. Wolding. Interim cor-WI-85-080-007 rective actions have IN-85-212-001 been formulated. To be closed upon

. completion of correction actions. CLOSED upon

- completion of corrective actions.

o Attachment 2*

Page 3 of 3 SEQUOYAH (GENERIC)

, WELD PROJECT EMPLOYEE ECTG REPORT NUMBER CONCERN NUMBER ISSUE ACTION l

WP-17-SQN IN-85-127-001 . Vendor Weld Quality The issue vendor welds IN-85-007-003 not the same quality

IN-85-657-001 as TVA field we'ds was substantiated by NSRS I-85-753-W8N. The issue that vendor welds are not inspected in field i was not substantiated.

Report close concerns.

No corrective action identified. CLOSED 6

y 1

]

h l

4

\

j i

i l

I f

4 i