ML20245H142

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Rev 22 to Offsite Dose Calculation Manual Changes
ML20245H142
Person / Time
Site: Sequoyah  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 08/15/1989
From:
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY
To:
Shared Package
ML20245G952 List:
References
PROC-890815, NUDOCS 8908160330
Download: ML20245H142 (11)


Text

m. . . , >.

f

, . . q

, i

. l I

s .

5 I

. er ,

0FFSITE 00SE' CALCULATION MANUAL CHe,NGES REVISION NO. 22 8908160330 890815 PDR R ADOCK 05000327 PDC

q; .-. .. - -

.c 4

n SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT OFFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL EFFECTIVE PAGE LISTING

. Revision 22 Par.e Revision Listing of Dates and. Revisions Revision 22 Tab).e of Contents.(pages 1-6) Revision 21 Pages 1 through 44 Revision 21

? ' S Page.44' Revision 22 Page 45 through 83 Revision 21 Pages 84 through 89 Revision 22 Pages 90 through 105 Revision 21 1

s_

EPL-1 00101

_l_._. . - . _ _ _ - . _ . - - - -

l- .

,' sc J SQN ODCM page 44 of 105 Revision 22 i

-3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring 3.1 Monitoring' Program An-environmental radiological monitoring program shall be conducted in accordance with Technical Specification 3.12.1. The monitoring program described in Tables 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3, and in Figures 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 shall be conducted. Results of this program shall be reported in accordance with Technical Specifications 6.9.1.6 and 6.9.1.7.

The atmospheric environmental radiological monitoring program shall consist of monitoring stations from which samples of air particulate and atmospheric radiciodine shall be collected.

    • The terrestrial monitoring program shall consist of the collection of milk, soil, ground water, drinking water, and food crops. In addition, direct gamma radiation levels will be measured in the vicinity of the plant.

The reservoir sampling program shall consist of the collection of samples.of surface water, sediment, clams, and fish.

Deviations are permitted from the required sampling schedule if specimens are unobtainable due to hazardous conditions, sample unavailability, or to malfunction of sampling equipment. If the latter, every effort shall be made to complete corrective action prior to the end of the next sampling period.

3.2 Detection capabilities

. Analytical techniques shall be such that the detection capabilities listed in Table 3.4 are achieved.

3.3 Interlaboratory Comparison Program Analyses shall be performed on radioactive materials supplied as part of an Interlaboratory Comparison Program which has been approved by the NRC. A summary of the results obtained in the intercomparison shall be included in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (or the EPA program code designation may be provided). -.

I If analyses are not performed as required corrective actions taken to prevent  :

a recurrence shall be reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

3.4 Land Use Census A land use survey shall be conducted in accordance with SQN Technical Specification 3/4.12.2. The results of the survey shall be reported in the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report.

00021

/

4 SQN CDCM

. Page 04 of 105 Revision 22 Table 3.1 (Sheet 1 of 4)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure Pathway Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Sample Locations

  • Collection Frequency of Analysis AIRBORNE Particulate 4 samples from loca- Continuous sampler Analyze for gross tions (in different operation with beta radioactivity sectors) at or near cample collection 1 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> follow-the site boundaty once per 7 days ing filter change. l (LM-2,3,4,and 5) (more frequently Perform gamma iso- l if required by dust topic analysis on 4 samples from com- loading) each sample if munities approx- gross beta > 10 imately 6-10 miles times yearly mean distance from the of control sample.

plant. (PM-2,3,8,and 9) Composite at least once per 31 days (by location for gamma scan).

4 samples from control locations greater than 10 miles from the plant (RM-1,2,3,and 4)

Radioiodine Samples from same Continuous sampler I-131 at least location as air operation with fil- once per 7 days particulate. ter collection once " '

per 7 days Soil Samples from same Once per year Ganma scan, Sr-89, locations as air Sr-90 once per particulate year DIRECT 2 or more dosimeters Once per 92 days Gamma dose at RADIATION placed at locations least once per (in different sectors 92 days at or near the site .

boundary in each of the 16 sectors.

2 or more denimeters placed at s1.ations located >S miles from the plant in ea% of the 16 sectors

  • Sample locations are listed in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 and shown on Figures 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 Entire Page Changed 00021

____________m __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _ _ _

u? ,

4

.,' SQN ODCM c page 85 of 105 Revision 22 Table 3'.1 (Sheet 2 of 4)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure pathway Sampling and Type and' Frequency "and/or Sample Sample Loce' ions

  • Collection Frequency of Analysis

. DIRECT 2 or more dosimeters RADIATION in at least 8 additional f(continued) locations of special interest.

WATERBORNE

. Surface TRM 497.0 Collected by auto- Ganna scan of each TRM 483. 4 matic sequential- composite sample.

,. TRM.473.2 type sampler ** with Composite for H-3 composite samples analysis at least collected at least once per 92 days once per 31 days Ground 1 sample adjacent to At least once per Gross beta and plant (location W-6) 92 days gamma ccan, Sr-89 Sr-90 and H-3 an-1 sample from ground alysis at least water source up- once per 92 days gradient Drinking 1 sample at the first Collected by auto- Gross beta and.

potable surface water matic sequential gamma scan of each supply downstream type sampler ** with composite sample, from the plant composite sample Composite for H-3' (TRM 473.0) collected at least Sr-89, Sr-90 at once per 31 days least once per 92 days.

1 sample at the next Grab sample once 2 downstream potable per 31 days surface water sup-pliers (greater than 10 miles downstream) '

(TRM 470.5 and 465.3) ,-

2 samples at control Samples collected by 20 cations (TRM 497.0 automatic sequential ,

and 503.8)*** type sampler with com- 1 posite sample collected {

I at least once per 31 days.

  • Sample locations are listed in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 and shown on Figures 3.1, 3.2 and 3.3 .
    • Samples shall be collected by collecting an aliquot at intervals not ) 1 exceeding 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br />.
      • The surface water sample collected at TRM 497.0 is considered a control l ior the raw drinking water sample.

Entire page Changed 00021

= _ _ .-

h .

a .*.  :. ~

'.' SQN ODCM

.- page 86 of 105 Revision 22 4

Table 3.1 (Sheet 3 of 4)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure pathway .

Sampling and Type and Frequency and/or Sample Sample-Locations

  • Collection Frequency of Analysis WATERBORNE (continued)

Sediment TRM 496.5, TRM 483.4 At least once por Gamma scan of each TRM 480.8, TRM 472.8_ 184 days sample.

Shoreline. -TRM 485, TRM 478 At least once per Gamma scan of each TRM 477 184 days sample.

INGESTION Gamma isotopic and Milk 1 sample from milk At least once per producing animals in 15 days I-131 analysis of each of 1-3. areas in- each sample. Sr-89 dicated by the cow Sr-90 once per census where doses are quarter calculated to be highest.

If samples are not avail-able from a milk animal location, doses to that area will be estimated by projecting the doses from concentrations detected in milk from other sectors or samples of vegetation will _

~^

be taken monthly where milk is not available (Table 3.1, Ad)

At least 1 cample from i a control location 1

1 Fish 1 sample cach from At least once per Gamma scan on l 184 days. One sam- edible portion l

Nickajack, Chicka-l mauga, and Watts ple of each of the '

l- Bar Reserviors following specios:

Channel Catfish Crappie Smallmouth Buffalo

  • Sample locations are listed in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 and shown on Figures 3.1, l 3.2 and 3.3 l

l l

l . Entire page Changed 00021 l

7

,3(  ;;; l

,1~'

,*- .SQN'0DCM Page 87 of 105~

- Revision 22 '

$$I

~ Table 3.1-(Sheet-4.of 4)

RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL' MONITORING PROGRAM Exposure Pathway : Sampling and Type and Frequency Eand/or' Sample Sample Locations * ' -Collection Frequency of Analysis-4i . INGESTION (continued).

/ Invertebrates 2 samples downstream- At least once per. Camma-scan on (Asiatic' Clams) from. plant discharge ** 184 days; edible portion-

~

1. sample upstream from the plant **-

Food- 1. sample each of. At least once per . Gamma scan'on

Products ~ principal' food. 365 days at time of. edible portion products grown at- harvest. The types F private gardens; of-foods available for and/or farms.in_the . sampling will vary.

immediate vicinity Following is a list of of: the plant typical foods which may.

-be available:

Cabbage and/or Lettuce Corn Green Beans Potatoes Tomatoes Vegetation Samples from~ farms At.least once per .I-131 and gamma ,c producing milk 31' days . scan at least:once ~' '

Ebut not providing .per 31 days.

a milk sample Sr-89..Sr-90 anal-(Farm Em) ysis at least once per 92 days.

-i

  • Sample locations-are listed in Tables 3.2 and 3.3 and shown on Figures 3.1, '

'3.2 and 3.3

    • No permanent stations established. Locations depend on availability of clams.

l Entire Page Changed 00021

1 .

l

  • L ,
  • SQIf ODCH I

Page 88 of 105 Revision 22 TABLE 3.2 (1 of 2)

SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Sampling Locations Map Approximate Indicator (I)

Location -Distance or Samples Number a Station Sector (Miles) Control (C) Collectedb 2 LM-2 N 0.8 I AP, CF, S 3 LM-3 SSW 1.2 I AP, CF, S

    • AP, CF, S 4 LM-4 NE 1.5 1 S LM-5 NNE 1.8 I AP, CF, S 7 PM-2 SW 3.8 I AP, CF, S 8 PM-3 W 5.6 I AP, CF, S 9 PM-8 SSW 8.7 I AP , CF, S 10 PM-9 WSW 2.6 I AP , CF, S 11 RM-1 SW 16.7 C AP, CF, S 12 RM-2 NNE 17.8 C AP, CF, S 13' RM-3 ESE 11.3 C AP , CF, S 14 'RM-4 WNW 18.9 C AP, CF, S l 15 Farm B NE 43.0 C M 16 ' Farm C NE 16.0 C M 17 Farm S NNE 12.0 C M 18- Farm J WNW 1.1 I M _

19 Farm MW NW 1.2 I M, We -

20 Farm EM N 2.6 I V i 24 Well No. 6 NNE O.15 I W 31 TRMd 473.0 --

11.5e I pg (C. F. Industries) 32 TRM 470.5 -- 14.08 I PW (E. I. DuPont) 33 TRM 465.3 -- 19.2e I PW (Chattanooga)

'34 TRM 497.0 --

12.50 Cf SW 35 TRM 503.8 --

19.30 C PW (Dayton) 36 TRM'496.5 --

12.0e C SD j 37 TRM 485.0 -- 0.50 C SS

'38 TRM 483.4 -- 1.10 1 SD, SW 39 TRM 480.8 -- 3.7e 1 39 40 TRM 477.0 -- 7.5e I SS 41 TRM 473.2 -- 11.3e 7 gy 42 TRM 472.8 -- 11.7e I SD 44 TRM 478.8 -- 6.Se 1 33 00021 s

lo

.2 o- oQN ODCM Page 89 of 105 Revision 22'-

TABLE'3.2 (2 of 2)

SEQUOYAH NUCLEAR PLANT Environmental Radiological Monitoring Program Sampling Locations

' Map. Approximate Indicator (I)

Location Distance or. Samples Number a- Station Sector (Miles) Control (C) Collectedb 45 TRM 425-471 -- --' I F

-(Nickajack)

Reservoir) 46 TRM 471-530 -- --

I F. CL (Chickamauga Reservoir) 47 TRM 530-602 -- --

C F (Watts Bar Reservoir) 48 Farm H NE 4.2 I M

a. See figures 3.1, 3.2, and 3.3
b. Sample Codes AP = Air particulate filter .

~

CF = Charcoal filter CL = Clams F = Fish M = Milk PW = Public water R = Rainwater S = Soil SD = Sediment SS = Shoreline sediment SW = Surface water s V = Vegetation W = Well water

c. A control for well water.
d. TRM = Tennessee River Mile.
e. Distance from plant dischargo (TRM 484.5)
f. Surface water sample also used as a contro.! for public water.

00021 m._._____m__._. _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _

" Title;- Handling of ' Changes to the SQN Of f site Dose RARC OP 8 Calculation Manual Revision 1 Page 5 of 5 ev a ucwui o

Appendix 1 SQN ODCM Change Description Form Description of change:0AWord Ae <4:en s a4 % L le or ,,,,, u ce n st sfod w i A re gu i r e "~t 1 : VI sj ad 3. seI , se.-e .vtya s A *- s 2 (2 fa clar/4,

.s .C r prom a uder:617)e lede ve c e fadie >, ' s o~-usll ,~ e ee an f %.s e a- ,,

r le s h 4 e-c'n (le u belede spe.e *'f*' c f u e s h'o ~r Sr c sile hen oof 4 sne :lk

/o-' z*~~yles n' sew /es ,; et)(5) /?es/St-eL /e L1 fe> renu /

.ft e c 61 n, e.s diseusse.ct a he'v e .

&lt*

pff

% g Pages affected:D) Sf, K ' CL) PSj W $^ Q 5) P s. P 9 ,: G ) S*?,P l & 9'67) V C El ,

Justification for change:0) Exidl,s wo rd!~ a l.s n d cfe*r

  • Y is in co , s sie f wIth tLe wuv a<%f

<n m 'rei 1, is<< i ; (1.) fa r /(;tJe t r a e ";~,* e+ lu~p-t e r ~m / ~n s n's on ?rcu J Aer ; (n) l/ac.a./d/cm s n , /.'., e + :=> r,ai'l r au in J by Tec h ' Spec s a t c pr w h e>, ml/4 s 's e, r a. ' nejf- a vails he (er voufine sno b. , : (t/) O n /se n / ddo <> . cfo (omf a ye.m ai- af r s ,s ec t!. 'e

). to e *d.'< n .% e1 ?.,'Joly. Pr o h?+, s ha ve be , n e c ~for e,t rec dy

) o% e> h fe <' +, a' m. e /n s t c r- ft-e ,po c.4 'es'w le.e d 'o n s, 'A:s eIr *~,9 e .v ///

pormt1 Mp ten, e re.v.s su es tier f e ( <~ s . Fro n e, v e tra a te to e 4 .<o 3 -

( 5 ) 7 % fe m ' J !cor ot f ~%s e c l1a- o_s w :// ra. s wM <'~ " Aa~3 =s A Sale'!b l i

-Analysis of effect of change on dose calculations, projections, or setpoint calculations:

$1 t*s o CA c,,,v e s n. ll li a w no e fhe.f on elo s e cc.{c IaY/cny /> re> ,' e e S'em .s oY .s c?'s> cr lovY dYe v m ? *--Y*'t><5, ,

{

l 1

Attach marked-up pages from the e T t revision of the SQN ODCM which show the chanCc. s

~ {

RARC Review: Date: ( [ [

RARC Chairman I/

I

- ,- ,. i 1

0356p/DNS01 -

79?9C(CWP.4 68)

I

SON L

SQA119 Page 22 Revision 14

' APPENDIX 0 Page 1 of 7 SCREENING REVIEW FORM FOR 00CUMENTING APPLICABILITY OF A SAFETY EVALUATION o xa.'sce. J. c, Document No. (i.e., ECN #, procedure # and revision, special test #, etc.) der >/

Description of Proposed Change, Test, or Experiment: /drwer d

  • elc r.T , 4a .- ,
  • e

- cen ; .%f .veh, re.va .*remd l AM 3r- J s .*s to o r om wder Delete <ecc;4'c

,l/.' o .vr e m t 4kse ta N n -

fa c d*%.s Or cle m sa i.l*5 i 'De /de v er add /in 3 w, _

in / leu c'4 m /h n,. /e s Nevtso n.h'/e 3. 2. 7e re ft/et de s o u(o *cs,

l. Oces the proposed cnange involve a change in the facility as described in the
    • SAR or a radwaste system? [ ] Yes [ ] No ( c F N/A If yes, a safety evaluation is required.

Justification A//A-

2. Oces the proposed change involve new procedures or instructions or revisions to instructions

[ ] Yes or p)rocedures

(" No [ ] N/A as described in the SAR or plant Tech Specs?

~ If yes, a safety evaluation is required. M Justification; f/w f*sM a De A 5 pees  ?> ru s'; d e n ca s ) r<<v;r ~ a 23

- a. . v e a t.s , r e si.n f.%t., L.r r:e c v ;'.-c ., uk / re d.wtov a '< J wi n .% .n n , /.', .

, in % o n r.m . % ,, o f &

,,w :le r .' e re. . , s.',,,  ;;H, rk :me .' L.+ , ut rL ,v.,,c r-5 ir<e h% s er r~ro e e>d u o v.s ef G HAi or &c4 &as.

a.

Jrerewd r'evis ' * *<5 ch*-~* r% --

3. 'Is' the proposed test or experiment described in the SAR or any otner NRC i

( "} N/A document authorizing the activity? ( 3 Yes [ ] No

  • If yes reference the SAR section or other NRC document authorizing the activity: A//A If no, a safety evaluation is requirea.

Justification: Ae/A

4. Is a change to the Technical Specifications required for conducting or implementing the change, or test, or experiment as described in the document? i

[ ] Yes (4 No If yes, return the document to the originator for revision, modification, or i initiation of a Technical Specification change.

Researched documents (specify sections) frAv sec. //. (, l 7ce /> be s . Soc . 3/4, / L lj 1 Prepared By: [calr>h 6. % /{a e-e $1d? $ S0e d & Date Wio/f9 (Print Name) ( S i'gna t u r e )

lI b

Approved By: b /h . 06 M /// ~

M. ,a Date l; (Print Name) (Signaturej/ /

Yv l0%i/)tvie_ [Dnreb / sr J e' Qu i

Title l Retention Period: Life of Plant 0713S/dar ~

,.3 1

- _ _ _ _ _