|
---|
Category:Report
MONTHYEARNL-24-0238, RIPE License Amendment Request to Change Containment Air Temperature Actions, Supplemental Information2024-06-14014 June 2024 RIPE License Amendment Request to Change Containment Air Temperature Actions, Supplemental Information NL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 ML21214A3182021-08-0202 August 2021 301 Comments NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-20-0034, Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R292020-01-17017 January 2020 Inservice Inspection Program Owner'S Activity Report for Outage 1R29 NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1713, Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure2018-04-0606 April 2018 Proposed Alternative GEN-ISI-ALT-2017-03, and HNP-ISI-ALT-05-07, Version 1.0 Service Water Evaluation for Code Case N-513-4 for Moderate Pressure, and for Higher Pressure NL-17-2061, Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B2017-12-14014 December 2017 Special Report 2017-002-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS NL-16-2541, Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results2016-11-29029 November 2016 Notification of 10 CFR 26.719(c) 30-Day Report for False Positive Drug Test Results NL-16-0810, Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report2016-06-0909 June 2016 Submittal of Post Accident Monitoring Report NL-16-0683, Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service2016-06-0202 June 2016 Special Report No. 2016-002-00, Alternate AC Source Out of Service NL-16-0751, Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C2016-05-23023 May 2016 Special Report 2016-001-00, Nonfunctional Radiation Monitor R-60B and R-60C ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15253A4102016-03-11011 March 2016 Enclosure 2 Screening Analysis Report NL-15-2276, Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20142015-12-23023 December 2015 Submittal of 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2014 NL-15-1489, 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-12082015-08-17017 August 2015 10 CFR 71.95 Report on Potential Issues Involving Radwaste Cask 8-1208 ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML15182A1752015-06-26026 June 2015 Completion of Required Action by NRC Order EA-12-051 Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Level Instrumentation ML15106A3102015-04-17017 April 2015 April 22, 2015, Meeting with Southern Nuclear Company, Draft Minimum Shift Staffing Analysis NL-15-0418, Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports2015-03-0505 March 2015 Revision 6, Pressure Temperature Limits Reports NL-15-0080, Special Report 2015-001-002015-01-26026 January 2015 Special Report 2015-001-00 NL-14-1899, Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20132014-12-0808 December 2014 Vogle, Units 1 and 2 - 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2013 NL-14-1109, Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051)2014-08-26026 August 2014 Third Six-Month Status Report of the Implementation of the Requirements of the Commission Order with Regard to Reliable Spent Fuel Pool Instrumentation (EA-12-051) ML14128A0832014-06-0303 June 2014 Staff Assessment of the Flooding Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident ML14101A1192014-04-16016 April 2014 Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14051A7342014-02-20020 February 2014 Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 22014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 2 ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 2024-06-14
[Table view] Category:Technical
MONTHYEARNL-22-0510, Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 20212022-07-14014 July 2022 Plants Units 1 and 2, 10 CFR 50.46 ECCS Evaluation Model Annual Report for 2021 NL-20-0713, Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic2020-09-21021 September 2020 Request for One-Time Exemption from 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Biennial Emergency Preparedness Exercise Requirements Due to COVID-19 Pandemic NL-19-0674, Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 12019-09-30030 September 2019 Proposed Alternative to Use ASME Code Case N-831-1, Ultrasonic Examination in Lieu of Radiography for Welds in Ferritic or Austenitic Pipe Section XI, Division 1 NL-19-0795, Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1.2019-05-31031 May 2019 Cameron Non-Proprietary Engineering Reports; ER-1180NP, Rev. 1, ER-1181NP, Rev. 1; ER-1182NP, Rev. 1; and ER-1183NP, Rev. 1. NL-17-1401, Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS2017-08-10010 August 2017 Post Accident Monitoring Report for 8 Train RVLIS ML16103A5722016-04-21021 April 2016 Transmittal of Final Farley Nuclear Plant Unit 2, Accident Sequence Precursor Analysis ML16103A5732016-04-21021 April 2016 Final ASP Analysis (LER 364-14-002) ML15226A2292015-07-31031 July 2015 PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals NL-15-1507, J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals2015-07-31031 July 2015 J.M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1, PWR Vessel Internals Program Plan for Aging Management of Reactor Internals ML14098A4752014-04-16016 April 2014 Unit 1 - Staff Assessment of the Seismic Walkdown Report Supporting Implementation of Near-Term Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Related to the Fukushima Dai-Ichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident NL-14-0342, Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites2014-03-31031 March 2014 Units 1 and 2, Seismic Hazard and Screening Report for CEUS Sites NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachme2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 1, Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report2014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 - Updated Seismic Recommendation 2.3 Walkdown Report NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 2172014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 62014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0692014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 234 of 562 Through 272 of 562 ML14071A0812014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 162 of 217 Through 193 of 217 ML14071A0802014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 108 of 217 Through 161 of 217 ML14071A0792014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 57 of 217 Through 107 of 217 ML14071A0742014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 430 of 562 Through 462 of 562 ML14071A0772014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 543 of 562 Through Attachment 6 ML14071A0762014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 501 of 562 Through 542 of 562 ML14071A0752014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 463 of 562 Through 500 of 562 ML14071A0732014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 392 of 562 Through 429 of 562 ML14071A0722014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 351 of 562 Through 391 of 562 ML14071A0712014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 ML14071A0702014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 273 of 562 Through 312 of 562 ML14071A0682014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 197 of 562 Through 233 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0672014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 161 of 562 Through 196 of 562 ML14071A0662014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 126 of 562 Through 160 of 562 ML14071A0652014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 91 of 562 Through 125 of 562 ML14071A0642014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 47 of 562 Through 90 of 562 ML14071A0632014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 7 Page 107 of 217 Through Attachment 8 Through End ML14071A0622014-02-20020 February 2014 Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 1 of 562 Through 46 of 562 NL-14-0249, Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 5622014-02-20020 February 2014 Joseph M. Farley, Unit 1, Enclosure 2, Updated Farley Unit 1 Seismic Walkdown Report for Resolution of Fukushima Near-Term Force Recommendation 2.3: Seismic Through Attachment 3 Page 313 of 562 Through 350 of 562 2022-07-14
[Table view] |
Text
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of/ 5 1Jvp Status: YO NEI UFI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1R17BO02 Equip. Class' I Equipment Description MCC 10 Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 121 Room, Area 72O Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[2/N]
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YECN/NO U- N/AO
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[2'/N0 UO N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y4 ND U] N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YI[ NO U[ N/AQ (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
~~~&E ~ r fA.T, A e
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y[d NO U'-
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 351 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 F -F7 Sheet 2 of 2I¢' -10 Status: Yo N[O U[-
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
EquipmentiDNo. QIREf7fe2 Equip. i Equipment Description MCC 18 Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yd ND UD N/AD 8, Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[2fANO U- N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yr/ND UD N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y4ND UO of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y[ND UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
0 mnL~dtoa ae may be added as necessary) r L/ 4v I Q~*Jt~ ML~,(T Evaluated by:. ~.Yu'AO Date: 7/to 1/1,P11,~v iv)I (K~) 11/t01tV z
Page 352 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 3 of:;3 ,tkolt 90 Status: Yj'NL-] UF'I]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR178002 Equip.
Equipment Description MCC 1B Photographs I T* dP WF~C 00J THE2ýT~ W~4--
To ppVE=P E-W JAOVe MjMtA 97 t~E:10 TfH.E M~cC LQC-ATACI)0k TI I iEAOT A~J AT Mep- 1 AFthMrC C~)~ ~T C~
Note: Note:
~jn, ~/
Note: Note:
Page 353 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 354 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 355 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 356 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 357 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 1\
-,J r
- '%esm Page 358 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 359 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
-'3
-J Page 360 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 "T--I -V.n Page 361 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
-3
-'t- N-. ,
Page 362 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 363 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 TI
- x ýZ-'
Page 364 of 562
nki 11 A ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. lalNG io4-mr I-U0, vr'ru Page 365 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
,%X she of Status: Y9 NEI U[0 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OIR178507-A Equip. Classý Equipment Description MCC IN Location: Bldg. DIESEl Floor El. 155 Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Auchorase
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one EI* NUI" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y9'Nr1 UlI N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface YjN3UQ N/ADJ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? YE'ND U-] N/AID
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO ND UD N/Alf (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y& NO Ul potentially adverse seismic conditions?
Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment Page 366 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 rC ~
Status: uE%ýINJ U
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 0IR17B507-A Equip. Class, Equipment Description MCC 1N Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Yd"NQ U N/AC
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, YI*C]N UI] N/AC]
and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[2/NE3 UC] N/AC]
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y*rNC UC adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
Plwc-Evaluated' ~-, -z-t [I
-1161- Iq a" M frw"014v.
Page 367 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0
.4 Page 368 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r-I I --
i . , I I Page 369 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 ofsfx' Staturs Y~dNI U1'N]u Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class'-2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECTSWITCH Location: Bldg. AUIYU1ARY Floor E. ,*/j4.. Room, Area Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL, The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Auchorae
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N§1"1 of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YNF'<0 U1) N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Ye"NO Ul- N/AQ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&NO UID N/Ar
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO U- N/AID "
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Yrb/NO 1)0 potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment clan name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 370 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 CAL Sheeat of Status: YE N[-] U[']
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR18B029 Equip. Class, 2 Equipment Description POWER DISCONNECT SWITCH Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIV<DOUEJ N/ACJ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[tNF[] U--1 N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Yb/ND U0- N/AQ 1;C'e t-T& r*i or'4Q V-V POT~ -JjC AI r a-XC Z t CV* 10.-'Baed on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Yt*"N[o UD Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YE4<cD UM adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
AJVDVf Evaluated by: .... k "* " Date: X - zo'Z-( Y~yk~( x~1a <Z/
Page 371 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 372 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 373 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet of Status: YI*N'*"1 UEJ Seismic Walkcdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1R168031 Equip. Class, o .
Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area 332 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anehoraee
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y[C NEý '
of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Ye* U['U N/AD
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface */N- U" N/AO oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Y&<CJ UEJ N/AQ
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO1 Nil UC NI5",
(Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y1140$F UQ]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
I Enter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 374 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 She~t 2 ofV"1 Status: Yt NEI UL]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. OIR18B031 Equip. Class2 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects 4
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y3, 1( UD N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[frlND UD N/AD and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y .-'ND- UD N/AD COt,roo T A 00 5-5/ v,ý ,.-.fs,-w, ,.,,,Jj' t- k.,,W .t.. IT-s ,,'C.-
40,, W_-T- O's- hct 5N1C tktkVC . 1& i5j ...
- --ýCL,
- 0. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[*-fq" UD of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y&ýN[]UD]
adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
/V6 A.>;
Evaluated by: G1 DX-ýfUAýý
-1 04 1 Date: V.z /.
- r. u4¶i4 A_________
Page 375 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 376 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS Page 377 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r14 F~I-Sheet I of 3 Status: YEý N[] Ur"I Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR18B035 Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 139 Room, Area - 3/Z Ai)
Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended) I ,
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchorage
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one Y8-N" of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
sewvALdd.. 3 - Z-o-q 5
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Y[tA ur- N/A-1
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface U0 N/A]
oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? ýýNO U!] N/AE
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Yt< NO UI] N/AD (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
-5& po-- &e p rd", A,4cAd-- ýt --r Av c, e
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y N0"] U!]
potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 378 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 Of 3 Status: 71NO] U0[
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. O1R18B035 Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description CIRCUIT BREAKER BOX Interaction Effects YA6NO- U["3 N/AD3
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures?
16N/NH UEJ N/AD
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? YS.-N)D UD] N/AD
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free " ~U0 of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Yý NQ UD adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 4 .02 Evaluated by: 5a*a*- 77 1f*.* Date: 9,/o. 2_0/12 L.JA . Hg," ci. tOL' Page 379 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 380 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 S
Sheet 1 of-dý Status: YMN-3 U-]
Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. Q1R21BOO1A Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER BOX Location: Bldg. AUXILIARY Floor El. 155' Room, Area 416 Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results of judgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraze I. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YO N of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? Yid NOI Ur N/AQ
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y,0 NO UO N/AQ oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? Yy"NO UO N/AO
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? YO NO UO N/APf (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y)1No UQ potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 381 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 2 of Status: NI- UI Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. 01R21BOO1A Equip. Class, Equipment Description VITAL AC BREAKER Box Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free from impact by nearby equipment or structures? Y)1NO UO N/AQ
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y) NO UI N/AO and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y NEI U= N/AO
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Yf ND UI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions 1I. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could Y -NO U-I adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
CommentS (Additional pages may be added as necessary) 2.ZAP Evaluated by Evaluated byDae Date:
clý LLD L-1 (Y
Page 382 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO, SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 383 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 384 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 385 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Sheet 1 of "L t ',
Status: Y[:f NO uf1 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR21EOO9C Equip. Class' 14 Equipment Description INVERTER IC ,,W.., fio,,* ..
Location: Bldg, AUXILIARY Floor El. # /it/ Room, Area ! p/t Manufacturer, Model, Etc. (optional but recommended)
Instructions for Completing Checklist This checklist may be used to document the results of the Seismic Walkdown of an item of equipment on the SWEL. The space below each of the following questions may be used to record the results ofjudgments and findings. Additional space is provided at the end of this checklist for documenting other comments.
Anchoraee
- 1. Is the anchorage configuration verification required (i.e., is the item one YM NU of the 50% of SWEL items requiring such verification)?
- 2. Is the anchorage free of bent, broken, missing or loose hardware? YE/INC UO N/AC
/
- 3. Is the anchorage free of corrosion that is more than mild surface Y[WN" U- N/AC oxidation?
- 4. Is the anchorage free of visible cracks in the concrete near the anchors? /UNO UC N/AC
- 5. Is the anchorage configuration consistent with plant documentation? Y[* NC UC N/AC (Note: This question only applies if the item is one of the 50% for which an anchorage configuration verification is required.)
Vel~ie'l~b £!OIIIOLVAANWOO ct *QHA2CtoMe FC7z5WS TOP-Q2IR2 w 9C " C,,IIZZI eO9A7 'PAT&V 'W/24/-9* (N07)
- 6. Based on the above anchorage evaluations, is the anchorage free of Y60t"No UC potentially adverse seismic conditions?
IEnter the equipment class name from Appendix B: Classes of Equipment.
Page 386 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 r, 11 6? ý)ý- fl Sheet 2 off ;jrP1 Status: YiA' N[] UrI] J11dF7 Seismic Walkdown Checklist (SWC)
Equipment ID No. QIR21EO09C Equip. Class, 14 Equipment Description INVERTER IC Interaction Effects
- 7. Are soft targets free firom impact by nearby equipment or structures? YIN" UEJ N/AC
- 8. Are overhead equipment, distribution systems, ceiling tiles and lighting, Y[V/NO U"I N/Al and masonry block walls not likely to collapse onto the equipment?
- 9. Do attached lines have adequate flexibility to avoid damage? Y[VN-I UCI N/ACl
- 10. Based on the above seismic interaction evaluations, is equipment free Y[ 4/N'- UCI of potentially adverse seismic interaction effects?
Other Adverse Conditions
- 11. Have you looked for and found no other seismic conditions that could YS(ND Ull adversely affect the safety functions of the equipment?
Comments (Additional pages may be added as necessary)
MOVE Evaluated by:. RWPMKl5 fi &J Date: __ __ __ __
I. 70AI / 'I L/ 9 ,//Ox-
/- 1 1 - I Page 387 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 388 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 389 of 562
ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 Page 390 of 562
NO. SNCF164-RPT-01, VERSION 2.0 ATTACHMENT 3: SEISMIC WALKDOWN CHECKLISTS I
a I ~1 Page 391 of 562