ML042470091: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:September 3, 2004Mr. David A. ChristianSr. Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
{{#Wiki_filter:September 3, 2004 Mr. David A. Christian Sr. Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUESTFOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS"
NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS


==Dear Mr. Christian:==
==Dear Mr. Christian:==


The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal dated August 7, 2003, which provided the 60-dayresponse to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2.
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal dated August 7, 2003, which provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2.
Your response to the enclosed request for additional information (RAI) is required in order for the NRC staff to complete its review.Our questions are provided in the Enclosure. The NRC staff requests a response to the RAIwithin 60 days of the date of this letter.Sincerely,/RA/Stephen R. Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-280, 50-281,         50-338, and 50-339
Your response to the enclosed request for additional information (RAI) is required in order for the NRC staff to complete its review.
Our questions are provided in the Enclosure. The NRC staff requests a response to the RAI within 60 days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
                                              /RA/
Stephen R. Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281, 50-338, and 50-339


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As stated September 3, 2004Mr. David A. Christian Sr. Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
As stated
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711
 
September 3, 2004 Mr. David A. Christian Sr. Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.
Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUESTFOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS"
NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS


==Dear Mr. Christian:==
==Dear Mr. Christian:==


The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal dated August 7, 2003, which provided the 60-dayresponse to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2.
The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal dated August 7, 2003, which provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2.
Your response to the enclosed request for additional information (RAI) is required in order for the NRC staff to complete its review.Our questions are provided in the Enclosure. The NRC staff requests a response to the RAIwithin 60 days of the date of this letter.Sincerely,/RA/Stephen R. Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor RegulationDocket Nos. 50-280, 50-281,         50-338, and 50-339
Your response to the enclosed request for additional information (RAI) is required in order for the NRC staff to complete its review.
Our questions are provided in the Enclosure. The NRC staff requests a response to the RAI within 60 days of the date of this letter.
Sincerely,
                                                      /RA/
Stephen R. Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281, 50-338, and 50-339


==Enclosure:==
==Enclosure:==
As stated Distribution:ACRS              KLandisDLPM DPRPUBLICSMonarque AWangLWhitney PDII-1 Rdg.EDunnington (paper copy)EHackettDSolorio MKowalAdams Accession Number ML042470091OFFICEPDII-1/PMPDII-2/LAPDII-1/SCNAMESMonarqueEDunningtonMJRoss-LeeDATE09/01/0409/01/0409/02/04OFFICIAL RECORD COPY REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONNRC BULLETIN 2003-01, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ONEMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS"NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANYBy letter dated August 7, 2003, Virginia Electric & Power Company (VEPCO) provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for the North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (NAPS) and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2 (SPS). The Bulletin requested VEPCO to either (1) state that the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment spray system (CSS) recirculation functions have been analyzed with respect to the potentially adverse post-accident debris blockage effects identified in the Bulletin and are in compliance with all existing applicable regulatory requirements, or (2) describe any interim compensatory measures that have been implemented or that will be implemented to reduce the interim risk associated with potentially degraded or nonconforming ECCS and CSS recirculation functions until an evaluation to determine compliance is complete. The NRC staff has completed its preliminary review of your response and has determined it needs the following additional information to complete our review: North Anna Power Station1.On page 3 of Attachment 1 of your NRC Bulletin 2003-01 response you state that "theprocess to change and issue revisions to the ERGs [Emergency Response Guidelines]
As stated Distribution:         ACRS                           KLandis               DLPM DPR PUBLIC                SMonarque                      AWang                LWhitney PDII-1 Rdg.           EDunnington (paper copy)       EHackett              DSolorio MKowal Adams Accession Number ML042470091 OFFICE    PDII-1/PM          PDII-2/LA          PDII-1/SC NAME      SMonarque          EDunnington        MJRoss-Lee DATE      09/01/04          09/01/04            09/02/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
to address containment sump blockage issues is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. Dominion will participate in these WOG [Westinghouse Owners Group] activities, and evaluate any recommended changes to determine if they are appropriate for NAPS.The WOG has developed operational guidance in response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and CE type pressurized-water reactors (PWRs). Please provide a discussion of your plans to consider implementing this new WOG guidance. Include a discussion of the WOG recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented at your plant, and the evaluations or analyses performed to determine which of the WOG recommended changes are acceptable at your plant. Provide technical justification for those WOG recommended compensatory measures not being implemented by your plant. Also include a detailed discussion of the procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented,and your schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.2.NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licenseescould consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Please discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures you considered for implementation at North Anna Power Station. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional considered measures.Enclosure Surry Power Station3.On page 3 of Attachment 2 of your NRC Bulletin 2003-01 response you state that "theprocess to change and issue revisions to the ERGs to address containment sump blockage issues is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. Dominion will participate in these WOG activities, and evaluate any recommended changes to determine if they are appropriate for SPS.The WOG has developed operational guidance in response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and CE type PWRs.
 
Please provide a discussion of your plans to consider implementing this new WOG guidance. Include a discussion of the WOG recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented at your plant, and the evaluations or analyses performed to determine which of the WOG recommended changes are acceptable at your plant. Provide technical justification for those WOG recommended compensatory measures not being implemented by your plant. Also include a detailed discussion ofthe procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented, and your schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.4.NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licenseescould consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Please discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures you considered for implementation at Surry Power Station. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional considered measures.
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS" NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY By letter dated August 7, 2003, Virginia Electric & Power Company (VEPCO) provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for the North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (NAPS) and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2 (SPS). The Bulletin requested VEPCO to either (1) state that the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment spray system (CSS) recirculation functions have been analyzed with respect to the potentially adverse post-accident debris blockage effects identified in the Bulletin and are in compliance with all existing applicable regulatory requirements, or (2) describe any interim compensatory measures that have been implemented or that will be implemented to reduce the interim risk associated with potentially degraded or nonconforming ECCS and CSS recirculation functions until an evaluation to determine compliance is complete. The NRC staff has completed its preliminary review of your response and has determined it needs the following additional information to complete our review:
Virginia Electric and Power Company cc:Ms. Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq.Senior Counsel Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
North Anna Power Station
Building 475, 5th Floor Rt. 156, Rope Ferry Road Waterford, Connecticut 06385Mr. Richard H. Blount, II Site Vice President Surry Power Station Virginia Electric and Power Company 5570 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883-0315Senior Resident InspectorSurry Power Station U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 5850 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883ChairmanBoard of Supervisors of Surry County Surry County Courthouse Surry, Virginia 23683Dr. W. T. LoughVirginia State Corporation Commission Division of Energy Regulation Post Office Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23218Dr. Robert B. Stroube, MD, MPHState Health Commissioner Office of the Commissioner Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218Office of the Attorney GeneralCommonwealth of Virginia 900 East Main Street Richmond, Virginia  23219Mr. Chris L. Funderburk, DirectorNuclear Licensing & Operations Support Innsbrook Technical Center Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
: 1.     On page 3 of Attachment 1 of your NRC Bulletin 2003-01 response you state that the process to change and issue revisions to the ERGs [Emergency Response Guidelines]
5000 Dominion Blvd.
to address containment sump blockage issues is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. Dominion will participate in these WOG [Westinghouse Owners Group] activities, and evaluate any recommended changes to determine if they are appropriate for NAPS. The WOG has developed operational guidance in response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and CE type pressurized-water reactors (PWRs). Please provide a discussion of your plans to consider implementing this new WOG guidance. Include a discussion of the WOG recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented at your plant, and the evaluations or analyses performed to determine which of the WOG recommended changes are acceptable at your plant. Provide technical justification for those WOG recommended compensatory measures not being implemented by your plant. Also include a detailed discussion of the procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented, and your schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.
Glen Allen, Virginia  23060-6711Mr. Jack M. DavisSite Vice President North Anna Power Station Virginia Electric and Power Company Post Office Box 402 Mineral, Virginia  23117-0402Mr. C. Lee LintecumCounty Administrator Louisa County Post Office Box 160 Louisa, Virginia  23093Old Dominion Electric Cooperative4201 Dominion Blvd.
: 2.     NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licensees could consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Please discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures you considered for implementation at North Anna Power Station. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional considered measures.
Glen Allen, Virginia  23060Senior Resident InspectorNorth Anna Power Station U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1024 Haley Drive Mineral, Virginia  23117Mr. William R. MatthewsVice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711}}
Enclosure
 
Surry Power Station
: 3. On page 3 of Attachment 2 of your NRC Bulletin 2003-01 response you state that the process to change and issue revisions to the ERGs to address containment sump blockage issues is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. Dominion will participate in these WOG activities, and evaluate any recommended changes to determine if they are appropriate for SPS. The WOG has developed operational guidance in response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and CE type PWRs.
Please provide a discussion of your plans to consider implementing this new WOG guidance. Include a discussion of the WOG recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented at your plant, and the evaluations or analyses performed to determine which of the WOG recommended changes are acceptable at your plant. Provide technical justification for those WOG recommended compensatory measures not being implemented by your plant. Also include a detailed discussion of the procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented, and your schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.
: 4. NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licensees could consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Please discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures you considered for implementation at Surry Power Station. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional considered measures.
 
Virginia Electric and Power Company cc:
Ms. Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq.           Office of the Attorney General Senior Counsel                       Commonwealth of Virginia Dominion Resources Services, Inc. 900 East Main Street Building 475, 5th Floor               Richmond, Virginia 23219 Rt. 156, Rope Ferry Road Waterford, Connecticut 06385          Mr. Chris L. Funderburk, Director Nuclear Licensing & Operations Support Mr. Richard H. Blount, II             Innsbrook Technical Center Site Vice President                   Dominion Resources Services, Inc.
Surry Power Station                   5000 Dominion Blvd.
Virginia Electric and Power Company   Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711 5570 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883-0315            Mr. Jack M. Davis Site Vice President Senior Resident Inspector            North Anna Power Station Surry Power Station                  Virginia Electric and Power Company U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission   Post Office Box 402 5850 Hog Island Road                 Mineral, Virginia 23117-0402 Surry, Virginia 23883 Mr. C. Lee Lintecum Chairman                              County Administrator Board of Supervisors of Surry County  Louisa County Surry County Courthouse               Post Office Box 160 Surry, Virginia 23683                Louisa, Virginia 23093 Dr. W. T. Lough                      Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Virginia State Corporation Commission 4201 Dominion Blvd.
Division of Energy Regulation         Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Post Office Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23218              Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station Dr. Robert B. Stroube, MD, MPH        U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State Health Commissioner             1024 Haley Drive Office of the Commissioner           Mineral, Virginia 23117 Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218 Mr. William R. Matthews Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711}}

Latest revision as of 01:55, 24 November 2019

9/03/04, North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2, RAI, Informational Bulletin 2003-01, Potential Impact of Debris Blockage on Emergency Sump Recirculation at Pressurized-Water Reactors.
ML042470091
Person / Time
Site: Surry, North Anna  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/03/2004
From: Stephen Monarque
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLII-1
To: Christian D
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
Monarque, S R, NRR/DLPM, 415-1544
References
BL-03-001
Download: ML042470091 (5)


Text

September 3, 2004 Mr. David A. Christian Sr. Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.

Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711

SUBJECT:

NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS

Dear Mr. Christian:

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal dated August 7, 2003, which provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2.

Your response to the enclosed request for additional information (RAI) is required in order for the NRC staff to complete its review.

Our questions are provided in the Enclosure. The NRC staff requests a response to the RAI within 60 days of the date of this letter.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Stephen R. Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281, 50-338, and 50-339

Enclosure:

As stated

September 3, 2004 Mr. David A. Christian Sr. Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Blvd.

Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711

SUBJECT:

NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED-WATER REACTORS

Dear Mr. Christian:

The NRC staff has reviewed your submittal dated August 7, 2003, which provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for North Anna and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2.

Your response to the enclosed request for additional information (RAI) is required in order for the NRC staff to complete its review.

Our questions are provided in the Enclosure. The NRC staff requests a response to the RAI within 60 days of the date of this letter.

Sincerely,

/RA/

Stephen R. Monarque, Project Manager, Section 1 Project Directorate II Division of Licensing Project Management Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-280, 50-281, 50-338, and 50-339

Enclosure:

As stated Distribution: ACRS KLandis DLPM DPR PUBLIC SMonarque AWang LWhitney PDII-1 Rdg. EDunnington (paper copy) EHackett DSolorio MKowal Adams Accession Number ML042470091 OFFICE PDII-1/PM PDII-2/LA PDII-1/SC NAME SMonarque EDunnington MJRoss-Lee DATE 09/01/04 09/01/04 09/02/04 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION NRC BULLETIN 2003-01, "POTENTIAL IMPACT OF DEBRIS BLOCKAGE ON EMERGENCY SUMP RECIRCULATION AT PRESSURIZED WATER REACTORS" NORTH ANNA AND SURRY POWER STATIONS, UNITS 1 AND 2 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC & POWER COMPANY By letter dated August 7, 2003, Virginia Electric & Power Company (VEPCO) provided the 60-day response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for the North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2 (NAPS) and Surry Power Stations, Units 1 and 2 (SPS). The Bulletin requested VEPCO to either (1) state that the emergency core cooling system (ECCS) and containment spray system (CSS) recirculation functions have been analyzed with respect to the potentially adverse post-accident debris blockage effects identified in the Bulletin and are in compliance with all existing applicable regulatory requirements, or (2) describe any interim compensatory measures that have been implemented or that will be implemented to reduce the interim risk associated with potentially degraded or nonconforming ECCS and CSS recirculation functions until an evaluation to determine compliance is complete. The NRC staff has completed its preliminary review of your response and has determined it needs the following additional information to complete our review:

North Anna Power Station

1. On page 3 of Attachment 1 of your NRC Bulletin 2003-01 response you state that the process to change and issue revisions to the ERGs [Emergency Response Guidelines]

to address containment sump blockage issues is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. Dominion will participate in these WOG [Westinghouse Owners Group] activities, and evaluate any recommended changes to determine if they are appropriate for NAPS. The WOG has developed operational guidance in response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and CE type pressurized-water reactors (PWRs). Please provide a discussion of your plans to consider implementing this new WOG guidance. Include a discussion of the WOG recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented at your plant, and the evaluations or analyses performed to determine which of the WOG recommended changes are acceptable at your plant. Provide technical justification for those WOG recommended compensatory measures not being implemented by your plant. Also include a detailed discussion of the procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented, and your schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.

2. NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licensees could consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Please discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures you considered for implementation at North Anna Power Station. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional considered measures.

Enclosure

Surry Power Station

3. On page 3 of Attachment 2 of your NRC Bulletin 2003-01 response you state that the process to change and issue revisions to the ERGs to address containment sump blockage issues is expected to be completed by March 31, 2004. Dominion will participate in these WOG activities, and evaluate any recommended changes to determine if they are appropriate for SPS. The WOG has developed operational guidance in response to NRC Bulletin 2003-01 for Westinghouse and CE type PWRs.

Please provide a discussion of your plans to consider implementing this new WOG guidance. Include a discussion of the WOG recommended compensatory measures that have been or will be implemented at your plant, and the evaluations or analyses performed to determine which of the WOG recommended changes are acceptable at your plant. Provide technical justification for those WOG recommended compensatory measures not being implemented by your plant. Also include a detailed discussion of the procedures being modified, the operator training being implemented, and your schedule for implementing these compensatory measures.

4. NRC Bulletin 2003-01 provides possible interim compensatory measures licensees could consider to reduce risks associated with sump clogging. In addition to those compensatory measures listed in Bulletin 2003-01, licensees may also consider implementing unique or plant-specific compensatory measures, as applicable. Please discuss any possible unique or plant-specific compensatory measures you considered for implementation at Surry Power Station. Include a basis for rejecting any of these additional considered measures.

Virginia Electric and Power Company cc:

Ms. Lillian M. Cuoco, Esq. Office of the Attorney General Senior Counsel Commonwealth of Virginia Dominion Resources Services, Inc. 900 East Main Street Building 475, 5th Floor Richmond, Virginia 23219 Rt. 156, Rope Ferry Road Waterford, Connecticut 06385 Mr. Chris L. Funderburk, Director Nuclear Licensing & Operations Support Mr. Richard H. Blount, II Innsbrook Technical Center Site Vice President Dominion Resources Services, Inc.

Surry Power Station 5000 Dominion Blvd.

Virginia Electric and Power Company Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711 5570 Hog Island Road Surry, Virginia 23883-0315 Mr. Jack M. Davis Site Vice President Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station Surry Power Station Virginia Electric and Power Company U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 402 5850 Hog Island Road Mineral, Virginia 23117-0402 Surry, Virginia 23883 Mr. C. Lee Lintecum Chairman County Administrator Board of Supervisors of Surry County Louisa County Surry County Courthouse Post Office Box 160 Surry, Virginia 23683 Louisa, Virginia 23093 Dr. W. T. Lough Old Dominion Electric Cooperative Virginia State Corporation Commission 4201 Dominion Blvd.

Division of Energy Regulation Glen Allen, Virginia 23060 Post Office Box 1197 Richmond, Virginia 23218 Senior Resident Inspector North Anna Power Station Dr. Robert B. Stroube, MD, MPH U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission State Health Commissioner 1024 Haley Drive Office of the Commissioner Mineral, Virginia 23117 Virginia Department of Health Post Office Box 2448 Richmond, Virginia 23218 Mr. William R. Matthews Vice President - Nuclear Operations Virginia Electric and Power Company Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, Virginia 23060-6711