ML102000421: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED NUCLEAR REGULATORY WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 21, 2010 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE RISK-INFORMED RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. ME3363 AND ME3364)  
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 21, 2010 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555
 
==SUBJECT:==
LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE RISK-INFORMED RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. ME3363 AND ME3364)


==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated February 15, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML100480009), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request to relocate specific surveillance frequency requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff is reviewing your submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete the review. The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. During a discussion with your staff on July 12, 2010, it was agreed that you would provide a response within 30 days from the date of this letter. The NRC staff considers that timely responses to requests for additional information help ensure sufficient time is available for staff review and contribute toward the NRC's goal of efficient and effective use of staff resources.
If circumstances result in the need to revise the requested response date, please contact me at (301) 415-1055.
Sincerely, Christopher Gratton, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and Request for Additional cc w/encl: Distribution via REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-373 and 50-374 In reviewing the Exelon Generation Company's (EGC's) application dated February 15, (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession ML100480009), related to the risk-informed relocation of specific surveillance frequency requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 (LSCS), the Nuclear Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the following information is needed in order complete its In the application, the licensee included an evaluation of proposed changes in Attachment Attachment 1, Item #3 in the application stated the The insert provided in TSTF-425 to replace text describing the basis for each Frequency relocated to the Surveillance Frequency Control Program has been revised from, "The Surveillance Frequency is based on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program," to read "The Frequency may be based on factors such as operating experience, equipment reliability, or plant risk, and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program." This deviation is necessary to reflect the LSCS basis for frequencies that do not, in all cases, base Frequency on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk. TSTF-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control-RITSTF Initiative 5b," (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML090850627, ML090850630, ML090850638, and ML090850640) was approved by Notice of Availability published in the Federal Register on July 6,2009. TSTF-425, Rev. 3 involves the relocation of most time-based surveillance frequencies to a licensee controlled program, called the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP), and adds the SFCP to the administrative controls section of the technical specifications (TSs). The SFCP does not include surveillance frequencies that are event driven, controlled by an existing program, or are condition-based.
Part of the TSTF-425 change to NUREG 1430 -1434 (Standard Technical Specifications) provides an optional insert (INSERT #2) to the existing TS Bases to facilitate adoption of the TSTF while retaining the existing NUREG TS Surveillance Frequency TS Bases for licensees not choosing to adopt TSTF-425.
The TSTF-425 TS Bases INSERT #2 states: The Surveillance Frequency is based on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program. Several licensees requesting license amendments to adopt TSTF-425 have identified a need to deviate from this statement because it only applies to Frequencies that have been changed in accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP) and does not apply to Frequencies that are relocated but not changed.
The NRC staff agrees that the TSTF-425 TS Bases insert applies only to relocated SFs that are subsequently evaluated and changed in accordance with the SFCP, and that the current insert does not apply to SFs relocated to the SFCP but remain unchanged.
For SFs relocated to the SFCP but not subsequently changed in accordance with the program, the existing TS Bases description remains valid Bases for these SFs. One option to address this concern for those instances where the licensee used TSTF-425 Insert 2, is to modify the wording used in the application as follows: "The Surveillance Frequency is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program" In addition, the following statement should be included regarding SF Bases relocated to the SFCP: "The existing Bases information describing the basis for the Surveillance Frequency will be relocated to the licensee-controlled Surveillance Frequency Control Program. " It should be noted that only the Bases for the SF can be relocated to the SFCP. The Bases for the TS Surveillance will remain in the TS Bases and should not be relocated to the SFCP. EGC's application for LSCS dated February 15, 2010, included the aforementioned deviations from the proposed language in TSTF-425, Revision 3. The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed deviation from TSTF-425 and requests that the licensee modify the application as described above, or develop an alternate resolution to the issue with Insert #2 described herein, and include appropriate justifications.
July 21,2010 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555 LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 -REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE RISK-INFORMED RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. ME3363 AND ME3364)


==Dear Mr. Pacilio:==
By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated February 15, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML100480009), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request to relocate specific surveillance frequency requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2.
By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated February 15, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML100480009), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request to relocate specific surveillance frequency requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2. The NRC staff is reviewing your submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete the review. The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. During a discussion with your staff on July 12, 2010, it was agreed that you would provide a response within 30 days from the date of this letter. The NRC staff considers that timely responses to requests for additional information help ensure sufficient time is available for staff review and contribute toward the NRC's goal of efficient and effective use of staff resources.
The NRC staff is reviewing your submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete the review. The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. During a discussion with your staff on July 12, 2010, it was agreed that you would provide a response within 30 days from the date of this letter.
If circumstances result in the need to revise the requested response date, please contact me at (301) 415-1055.
The NRC staff considers that timely responses to requests for additional information help ensure sufficient time is available for staff review and contribute toward the NRC's goal of efficient and effective use of staff resources. If circumstances result in the need to revise the requested response date, please contact me at (301) 415-1055.
Sincerely, IRA! Christopher Gratton, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and Request for Additional cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv DISTRIBUTION:
Sincerely, C~
PUBLIC LPL3-2 RtF RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 Resource RidsNrrPMLaSalie Resource RidsNrrLATHarris Resource RidsOgcRp Resource RidsAcrsAcnw MailCTR Resource RidsRgn3MailCenter Resource RidsNrrDoriDpr Resource RidsNrrPMQuadCities Resource ADAMS Accession No. ML102000421 NRR-088 OFFICE LPL3-2/PM LPL3-2/LA LPL3-2/BC LPL3-2/PM NAME CGratton BClayton for THarris RCarlson CGratton DATE 7/20/10 7/20/10 7/20/10 7/21/10 OFFICIAL RECORD}}
Christopher Gratton, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374
 
==Enclosure:==
 
Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv
 
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-373 and 50-374 In reviewing the Exelon Generation Company's (EGC's) application dated February 15, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.
ML100480009), related to the risk-informed relocation of specific surveillance frequency (SF) requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 (LSCS), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the following information is needed in order to complete its review:
In the application, the licensee included an evaluation of proposed changes in Attachment 1. , Item #3 in the application stated the following:
The insert provided in TSTF-425 to replace text describing the basis for each Frequency relocated to the Surveillance Frequency Control Program has been revised from, "The Surveillance Frequency is based on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program," to read "The Frequency may be based on factors such as operating experience, equipment reliability, or plant risk, and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program." This deviation is necessary to reflect the LSCS basis for frequencies that do not, in all cases, base Frequency on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk.
TSTF-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control- RITSTF Initiative 5b," (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML090850627, ML090850630, ML090850638, and ML090850640) was approved by Notice of Availability published in the Federal Register on July 6,2009. TSTF-425, Rev. 3 involves the relocation of most time-based surveillance frequencies to a licensee controlled program, called the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP), and adds the SFCP to the administrative controls section of the technical specifications (TSs). The SFCP does not include surveillance frequencies that are event driven, controlled by an existing program, or are condition-based.
Part of the TSTF-425 change to NUREG 1430 -1434 (Standard Technical Specifications) provides an optional insert (INSERT #2) to the existing TS Bases to facilitate adoption of the TSTF while retaining the existing NUREG TS Surveillance Frequency TS Bases for licensees not choosing to adopt TSTF-425. The TSTF-425 TS Bases INSERT #2 states:
The Surveillance Frequency is based on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.
Several licensees requesting license amendments to adopt TSTF-425 have identified a need to deviate from this statement because it only applies to Frequencies that have been changed in accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP) and does not apply to Frequencies that are relocated but not changed.
 
                                                -2 The NRC staff agrees that the TSTF-425 TS Bases insert applies only to relocated SFs that are subsequently evaluated and changed in accordance with the SFCP, and that the current insert does not apply to SFs relocated to the SFCP but remain unchanged. For SFs relocated to the SFCP but not subsequently changed in accordance with the program, the existing TS Bases description remains valid Bases for these SFs.
One option to address this concern for those instances where the licensee used TSTF-425 Insert 2, is to modify the wording used in the application as follows:
        "The Surveillance Frequency is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program" In addition, the following statement should be included regarding SF Bases relocated to the SFCP:
        "The existing Bases information describing the basis for the Surveillance Frequency will be relocated to the licensee-controlled Surveillance Frequency Control Program. "
It should be noted that only the Bases for the SF can be relocated to the SFCP. The Bases for the TS Surveillance will remain in the TS Bases and should not be relocated to the SFCP.
EGC's application for LSCS dated February 15, 2010, included the aforementioned deviations from the proposed language in TSTF-425, Revision 3. The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed deviation from TSTF-425 and requests that the licensee modify the application as described above, or develop an alternate resolution to the issue with Insert #2 described herein, and include appropriate justifications.
 
ML102000421                       NRR-088 OFFICE       LPL3-2/PM       LPL3-2/LA         LPL3-2/BC         LPL3-2/PM NAME         CGratton       BClayton for       RCarlson         CGratton THarris DATE         7/20/10         7/20/10           7/20/10           7/21/10}}

Revision as of 15:59, 13 November 2019

Request for Additional Information Related to the Risk-Informed Relocation of Specific Surveillance Frequency Requirements
ML102000421
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/21/2010
From: Gratton C
Plant Licensing Branch III
To: Pacilio M
Exelon Nuclear
Gratton C, NRR/DORL/LPL3-2, 415-1055
References
TAC ME3363, TAC ME3364
Download: ML102000421 (4)
v • d • e


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 21, 2010 Mr. Michael J. Pacilio President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Nuclear 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO THE RISK-INFORMED RELOCATION OF SPECIFIC SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY REQUIREMENTS (TAC NOS. ME3363 AND ME3364)

Dear Mr. Pacilio:

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated February 15, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML100480009), Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request to relocate specific surveillance frequency requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2.

The NRC staff is reviewing your submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete the review. The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. During a discussion with your staff on July 12, 2010, it was agreed that you would provide a response within 30 days from the date of this letter.

The NRC staff considers that timely responses to requests for additional information help ensure sufficient time is available for staff review and contribute toward the NRC's goal of efficient and effective use of staff resources. If circumstances result in the need to revise the requested response date, please contact me at (301) 415-1055.

Sincerely, C~

Christopher Gratton, Senior Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: Distribution via Listserv

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION LASALLE COUNTY STATION, UNITS 1 AND 2 DOCKET NOS. 50-373 and 50-374 In reviewing the Exelon Generation Company's (EGC's) application dated February 15, 2010 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No.

ML100480009), related to the risk-informed relocation of specific surveillance frequency (SF) requirements for the LaSalle County Station, Units 1 and 2 (LSCS), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has determined that the following information is needed in order to complete its review:

In the application, the licensee included an evaluation of proposed changes in Attachment 1. , Item #3 in the application stated the following:

The insert provided in TSTF-425 to replace text describing the basis for each Frequency relocated to the Surveillance Frequency Control Program has been revised from, "The Surveillance Frequency is based on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program," to read "The Frequency may be based on factors such as operating experience, equipment reliability, or plant risk, and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program." This deviation is necessary to reflect the LSCS basis for frequencies that do not, in all cases, base Frequency on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk.

TSTF-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control- RITSTF Initiative 5b," (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML090850627, ML090850630, ML090850638, and ML090850640) was approved by Notice of Availability published in the Federal Register on July 6,2009. TSTF-425, Rev. 3 involves the relocation of most time-based surveillance frequencies to a licensee controlled program, called the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP), and adds the SFCP to the administrative controls section of the technical specifications (TSs). The SFCP does not include surveillance frequencies that are event driven, controlled by an existing program, or are condition-based.

Part of the TSTF-425 change to NUREG 1430 -1434 (Standard Technical Specifications) provides an optional insert (INSERT #2) to the existing TS Bases to facilitate adoption of the TSTF while retaining the existing NUREG TS Surveillance Frequency TS Bases for licensees not choosing to adopt TSTF-425. The TSTF-425 TS Bases INSERT #2 states:

The Surveillance Frequency is based on operating experience, equipment reliability, and plant risk and is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.

Several licensees requesting license amendments to adopt TSTF-425 have identified a need to deviate from this statement because it only applies to Frequencies that have been changed in accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP) and does not apply to Frequencies that are relocated but not changed.

-2 The NRC staff agrees that the TSTF-425 TS Bases insert applies only to relocated SFs that are subsequently evaluated and changed in accordance with the SFCP, and that the current insert does not apply to SFs relocated to the SFCP but remain unchanged. For SFs relocated to the SFCP but not subsequently changed in accordance with the program, the existing TS Bases description remains valid Bases for these SFs.

One option to address this concern for those instances where the licensee used TSTF-425 Insert 2, is to modify the wording used in the application as follows:

"The Surveillance Frequency is controlled under the Surveillance Frequency Control Program" In addition, the following statement should be included regarding SF Bases relocated to the SFCP:

"The existing Bases information describing the basis for the Surveillance Frequency will be relocated to the licensee-controlled Surveillance Frequency Control Program. "

It should be noted that only the Bases for the SF can be relocated to the SFCP. The Bases for the TS Surveillance will remain in the TS Bases and should not be relocated to the SFCP.

EGC's application for LSCS dated February 15, 2010, included the aforementioned deviations from the proposed language in TSTF-425, Revision 3. The NRC staff has reviewed the proposed deviation from TSTF-425 and requests that the licensee modify the application as described above, or develop an alternate resolution to the issue with Insert #2 described herein, and include appropriate justifications.

ML102000421 NRR-088 OFFICE LPL3-2/PM LPL3-2/LA LPL3-2/BC LPL3-2/PM NAME CGratton BClayton for RCarlson CGratton THarris DATE 7/20/10 7/20/10 7/20/10 7/21/10

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML102000421&oldid=2130642"