ML11152A003: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 12: Line 12:
| document type = E-Mail
| document type = E-Mail
| page count = 2
| page count = 2
| project =
| stage = Acceptance Review
}}
}}


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:1 NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 1:33 PM To: David.Heacock@dom.com Cc: Tom Shaub  
{{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From:                       Wiebe, Joel Sent:                       Tuesday, May 31, 2011 1:33 PM To:                         David.Heacock@dom.com Cc:                         Tom Shaub


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acc eptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1
North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1


==Dear Mr. Heacock:==
==Dear Mr. Heacock:==


By letter dated May 17, 2011, Virginia Electric Power Company submitted a request for alternative to ASME Code pressurizer nozzle-to-vessel weld examination requirements for North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff's acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.  
By letter dated May 17, 2011, Virginia Electric Power Company submitted a request for alternative to ASME Code pressurizer nozzle-to-vessel weld examination requirements for North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1.
 
The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staff's ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.  
The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
 
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606.
If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606.
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation  
Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1


Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 54   Mail Envelope Properties   (Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov20110531133300)
Hearing Identifier:   NRR_PMDA Email Number:         54 Mail Envelope Properties   (Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov20110531133300)


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1 Sent Date:   5/31/2011 1:33:16 PM Received Date: 5/31/2011 1:33:00 PM From:   Wiebe, Joel Created By:   Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients:     "Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com> Tracking Status: None "David.Heacock@dom.com" <David.Heacock@dom.com> Tracking Status: None Post Office:     Files     Size     Date & Time MESSAGE   1763     5/31/2011 1:33:00 PM
North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1 Sent Date:             5/31/2011 1:33:16 PM Received Date:         5/31/2011 1:33:00 PM From:                 Wiebe, Joel Created By:           Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients:
 
"Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com>
Options Priority:     Standard   Return Notification:   No   Reply Requested:   No   Sensitivity:     Normal Expiration Date:     Recipients Received:}}
Tracking Status: None "David.Heacock@dom.com" <David.Heacock@dom.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files                         Size                     Date & Time MESSAGE                       1763                     5/31/2011 1:33:00 PM Options Priority:                     Standard Return Notification:           No Reply Requested:               No Sensitivity:                   Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received:}}

Revision as of 20:04, 12 November 2019

Acceptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1
ML11152A003
Person / Time
Site: North Anna Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 05/31/2011
From: Joel Wiebe
Plant Licensing Branch II
To: Heacock D
Dominion Generation
References
Download: ML11152A003 (2)


Text

NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Wiebe, Joel Sent: Tuesday, May 31, 2011 1:33 PM To: David.Heacock@dom.com Cc: Tom Shaub

Subject:

North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1

Dear Mr. Heacock:

By letter dated May 17, 2011, Virginia Electric Power Company submitted a request for alternative to ASME Code pressurizer nozzle-to-vessel weld examination requirements for North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1.

The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this request. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.

The NRC staff has reviewed your request and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.

If you have any questions, please contact me at (301) 415-6606.

Joel S. Wiebe, Sr. Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch II-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation 1

Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 54 Mail Envelope Properties (Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov20110531133300)

Subject:

North Anna Power Station, Unit No. 1 - Acceptance Review of Request for Alternative to ASME Code Pzr Nozzle-to-Vessel Weld Exam Requirements - N1-I4-NDE-003-R1 Sent Date: 5/31/2011 1:33:16 PM Received Date: 5/31/2011 1:33:00 PM From: Wiebe, Joel Created By: Joel.Wiebe@nrc.gov Recipients:

"Tom Shaub" <tom.shaub@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None "David.Heacock@dom.com" <David.Heacock@dom.com>

Tracking Status: None Post Office:

Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 1763 5/31/2011 1:33:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:

Recipients Received: