ML12306A069: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:kP, REGuj4÷' UNITED STATES 0 ANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION IV 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4005 February 19, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Bernadette Baca, Allegation Coordinator FROM: Ryan Lantz, Chief, Operations Branch | {{#Wiki_filter:kP, REGuj4 | ||
÷' UNITED STATES 0 ANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
*--REGION IV 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4005 February 19, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Bernadette Baca, Allegation Coordinator FROM: Ryan Lantz, Chief, Operations Branch | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
Callaway Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I The Operations Branch has completed our review of the information relevant to Allegation Case No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern1. | Callaway Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I The Operations Branch has completed our review of the information relevant to Allegation Case No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern1. The results of this review are documented below. This memorandum provides overall closure basis for Allegation Case No. RIV-2006-A-0033. | ||
The results of this review are documented below. This memorandum provides overall closure basis for Allegation Case No. RIV-2006-A-0033. | |||
===Background=== | ===Background=== | ||
On April 16, 2007, Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033 was closed after an independent investigation was performed by the NRC Office of Investigations (01). The investigation was documented in 01 Report No. 4-2006-025. | On April 16, 2007, Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033 was closed after an independent investigation was performed by the NRC Office of Investigations (01). The investigation was documented in 01 Report No. 4-2006-025. The 01 investigation concluded that the allegation was unsubstantiated. The NRC issued a letter to the concerned individual closing all seven concerns associated with Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033 as unsubstantiated in a letter dated April 16, 2007. On November 2, 2007, Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 1 was reopened by the Allegation Review Board after additional information was provided to the NRC by the concerned individual. 01 subsequently performed a followup investigation to assess the concern. The investigation was conducted from November 9, 2007, through December 3, 2008. | ||
The 01 investigation concluded that the allegation was unsubstantiated. | A supplemental report to 01 Report No. 4-2006-025 was issued on December 3, 2008. The Operations Branch reviewed Ol's assessments to address the subject allegation concern. | ||
The NRC issued a letter to the concerned individual closing all seven concerns associated with Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033 as unsubstantiated in a letter dated April 16, 2007. On November 2, 2007, Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 1 was reopened by the Allegation Review Board after additional information was provided to the NRC by the concerned individual. | RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 1: An (b)(7)(C) as not attentive to his duties for (\ .,..- | ||
01 subsequently performed a followup investigation to assess the concern. The investigation was conducted from November 9, 2007, through December 3, 2008.A supplemental report to 01 Report No. 4-2006-025 was issued on December 3, 2008. The Operations Branch reviewed Ol's assessments to address the subject allegation concern.RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 1: An (b)(7)(C) as not attentive to his duties for (\ .,..-months.Original NRC Response to RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I from a letter addressed to the concerned individual from NRC Region IV dated April 16, 2007: 01 initiated an investigation to determine | months. | ||
Based on the information developed during the investigation, the NRC staff concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to substantiate the concern that the (bXT)(7c) was not attentive to his duties.This concern was not substantiated (and the allegation was closed).NRC Response to RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I after a followup investigation was performed from November 9, 2007 to December 3, 2008: The 01 investigation was reopened to interview additional personnel and review additional records based on new information provided by the concerned individual. | Original NRC Response to RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I from a letter addressed to the concerned individual from NRC Region IV dated April 16, 2007: | ||
01 personnel interviewed 40 additional current and former Callaway employees to determine if anyone had observed the (b)(7)(C) | 01 initiated an investigation to determine ifad Iv.as not attentive to'his duties. The investigator interviewed various people and reviewed procedures and other documentary evidence, including Licensed Operator Continuing Training (LOCT) Evaluation summary reports and fitness for duty records. | ||
Ibeing inattentive to his duties.One individual interviewed indicated that on two occasions during the summer and fall of 2005, he observed the(b-)(7)(C) n the control room, and on one other occasion he observed the samel(b)(7)(C) in ttentive in a meeting (outside the control room) in the presence of anl (b)(7)(c) | |||
This individual also indicated that he raised the sleeping and inattentiveness concerns to operations management. | Based on the information developed during the investigation, the NRC staff concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to substantiate the concern that the (bXT)(7c) was not attentive to his duties. | ||
01 personnel subsequently interviewed the associated operations management personnel None | This concern was not substantiated (and the allegation was closed). | ||
I had been inattentive while on duty, the NRC staff concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to substantiate the concern, and this allegation is therefore closed.On February 18, 2009, Mr. R. Caniano, Director, Division of Reactor Safety, NRC Region IV, and Mr. W. Jones, Chief, Allegation and Enforcement Staff, NRC Region IV, met with the concerned individual to explain the processes and procedures used to investigate and evaluate the concern. Mr. Caniano and Mr. Jones emphasized to the concerned individual that the assertion that an (b)(7)(C) | NRC Response to RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I after a followup investigation was performed from November 9, 2007 to December 3, 2008: | ||
Ihad been inattentive to his duties was taken very seriously, and that the investigations pe-fformed were as thorough and comprehensive as possible.}} | The 01 investigation was reopened to interview additional personnel and review additional records based on new information provided by the concerned individual. 01 personnel interviewed 40 additional current and former Callaway employees to determine if anyone had observed the (b)(7)(C) Ibeing inattentive to his duties. | ||
One individual interviewed indicated that on two occasions during the summer and fall of 2005, he observed the(b-)(7)(C) n the control room, and on one other occasion he observed the samel(b)(7)(C) in ttentive in a meeting (outside the control room) in the presence of anl (b)(7)(c) This individual also indicated that he raised the sleeping and inattentiveness concerns to operations management. 01 personnel subsequently interviewed the associated operations management personnel None nfLt could recall any conversations or concerns with this individual regarding thel j" ")(C) j being inattentive while on duty. | |||
The other 39 individuals were identified as potential witnesses by 01 since they may have been in a position to observe the [(bx7c) jn the control room at the same time as the individual noted above. However, these individuals provided no additional testimony to support the allegation that thel( )(7)(C) = had been inattentive while on duty in the control room. | |||
Based on the information developed during the initial and second investigations, and because only one individual out of 40 personnel interviewed testified that the f(b)(7)(C) I had been inattentive while on duty, the NRC staff concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to substantiate the concern, and this allegation is therefore closed. | |||
On February 18, 2009, Mr. R. Caniano, Director, Division of Reactor Safety, NRC Region IV, and Mr. W. Jones, Chief, Allegation and Enforcement Staff, NRC Region IV, met with the concerned individual to explain the processes and procedures used to investigate and evaluate the concern. Mr. Caniano and Mr. Jones emphasized to the concerned individual that the assertion that an (b)(7)(C) Ihad been inattentive to his duties was taken very seriously, and that the investigations pe-fformed were as thorough and comprehensive as possible.}} | |||
Latest revision as of 20:42, 11 November 2019
| ML12306A069 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 02/19/2009 |
| From: | Ryan Lantz Operations Branch IV |
| To: | Bernadette Baca Division of Reactor Safety IV |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2012-0126, RIV-2006-A-0033 | |
| Download: ML12306A069 (2) | |
Text
kP, REGuj4
÷' UNITED STATES 0 ANUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
- --REGION IV 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, SUITE 400 ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4005 February 19, 2009 MEMORANDUM TO: Bernadette Baca, Allegation Coordinator FROM: Ryan Lantz, Chief, Operations Branch
SUBJECT:
Callaway Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I The Operations Branch has completed our review of the information relevant to Allegation Case No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern1. The results of this review are documented below. This memorandum provides overall closure basis for Allegation Case No. RIV-2006-A-0033.
Background
On April 16, 2007, Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033 was closed after an independent investigation was performed by the NRC Office of Investigations (01). The investigation was documented in 01 Report No. 4-2006-025. The 01 investigation concluded that the allegation was unsubstantiated. The NRC issued a letter to the concerned individual closing all seven concerns associated with Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033 as unsubstantiated in a letter dated April 16, 2007. On November 2, 2007, Allegation No. RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 1 was reopened by the Allegation Review Board after additional information was provided to the NRC by the concerned individual. 01 subsequently performed a followup investigation to assess the concern. The investigation was conducted from November 9, 2007, through December 3, 2008.
A supplemental report to 01 Report No. 4-2006-025 was issued on December 3, 2008. The Operations Branch reviewed Ol's assessments to address the subject allegation concern.
RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern 1: An (b)(7)(C) as not attentive to his duties for (\ .,..-
months.
Original NRC Response to RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I from a letter addressed to the concerned individual from NRC Region IV dated April 16, 2007:
01 initiated an investigation to determine ifad Iv.as not attentive to'his duties. The investigator interviewed various people and reviewed procedures and other documentary evidence, including Licensed Operator Continuing Training (LOCT) Evaluation summary reports and fitness for duty records.
Based on the information developed during the investigation, the NRC staff concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to substantiate the concern that the (bXT)(7c) was not attentive to his duties.
This concern was not substantiated (and the allegation was closed).
NRC Response to RIV-2006-A-0033, Concern I after a followup investigation was performed from November 9, 2007 to December 3, 2008:
The 01 investigation was reopened to interview additional personnel and review additional records based on new information provided by the concerned individual. 01 personnel interviewed 40 additional current and former Callaway employees to determine if anyone had observed the (b)(7)(C) Ibeing inattentive to his duties.
One individual interviewed indicated that on two occasions during the summer and fall of 2005, he observed the(b-)(7)(C) n the control room, and on one other occasion he observed the samel(b)(7)(C) in ttentive in a meeting (outside the control room) in the presence of anl (b)(7)(c) This individual also indicated that he raised the sleeping and inattentiveness concerns to operations management. 01 personnel subsequently interviewed the associated operations management personnel None nfLt could recall any conversations or concerns with this individual regarding thel j" ")(C) j being inattentive while on duty.
The other 39 individuals were identified as potential witnesses by 01 since they may have been in a position to observe the [(bx7c) jn the control room at the same time as the individual noted above. However, these individuals provided no additional testimony to support the allegation that thel( )(7)(C) = had been inattentive while on duty in the control room.
Based on the information developed during the initial and second investigations, and because only one individual out of 40 personnel interviewed testified that the f(b)(7)(C) I had been inattentive while on duty, the NRC staff concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to substantiate the concern, and this allegation is therefore closed.
On February 18, 2009, Mr. R. Caniano, Director, Division of Reactor Safety, NRC Region IV, and Mr. W. Jones, Chief, Allegation and Enforcement Staff, NRC Region IV, met with the concerned individual to explain the processes and procedures used to investigate and evaluate the concern. Mr. Caniano and Mr. Jones emphasized to the concerned individual that the assertion that an (b)(7)(C) Ihad been inattentive to his duties was taken very seriously, and that the investigations pe-fformed were as thorough and comprehensive as possible.