ML17292B357: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (RXDS)ACCESSION NBR:9804300263 DOC.DATE: 98/04/24 NOTARIZED:
{{#Wiki_filter:CATEGORY REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI           SYSTEM (RXDS)
YES DOCKET¹FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397~~~AUTH.NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION COLEMAN,D.W.
ACCESSION NBR:9804300263
Washington Public Power Supply System RECXP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)
                  ~                  DOC.DATE: 98/04/24       NOTARIZED: YES             DOCKET   ¹ FACIL:50-397       WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public             Powe   05000397 AUTH. NAME             AUTHOR AFFILIATION COLEMAN,D.W.   ~      Washington Public Power Supply System RECXP.NAME
          ~                RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Submits proprietary
Submits proprietary & non-proprietary               info re request for amend to TS to establish safety         limits for Cycle 14.Encls contain info re effects of channel bow & changing core design on safety limits. Proprietary info withheld.
&non-proprietary info re request for amend to TS to establish safety limits for Cycle 14.Encls contain info re effects of channel bow&changing core design on safety limits.Proprietary info withheld.DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE: TITLE: OR Submittal:
DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D         COPIES RECEIVED:LTR           ENCL       SIZE:
General Distribution NOTES: E RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD4-2 LA POSLUSNY,C COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 1 1 RECIPIENT ID CODE/NAME PD4-2 PD COPIES LTTR ENCL 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS NRR/DE/ECGB/A NRR/DRCH/HICB NRR/DSSA/SRZB OGC/HDS3 TERNAL: NOAC 1 1 1 1 1 1 1'1 0 FXLE CENTE 01 NRR DE CB NRR/DSSA/SPLB NUDOCS-ABSTRACT NRC PDR 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 D U E NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
TITLE:   OR Submittal: General Distribution E
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE.TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS e OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD)ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 14 ENCL 13 0~f 1 L e'I 7~
NOTES:
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PO.Box 968~Richland, Washington 99352-0968 April 24, 1998 GO2-98-063 Docket No.50-397 U.S.Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.20555 Gentlemen:
RECIPIENT            COPIES            RECIPIENT             COPIES ID  CODE/NAME        LTTR ENCL        ID CODE/NAME       LTTR ENCL PD4-2 LA                   1     1     PD4-2 PD                 1      1 POSLUSNY,C                1     1 INTERNAL: ACRS                         1    1      FXLE CENTE      01      1      1 NRR/DE/ECGB/A             1    1      NRR DE      CB            1      1 NRR/DRCH/HICB             1  '
1      NRR/DSSA/SPLB            1     1 NRR/DSSA/SRZB              1            NUDOCS-ABSTRACT           1     1 OGC/HDS3                  1     0 TERNAL: NOAC                                      NRC PDR                  1     1 D
U E
NOTE TO   ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:
PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS e     OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR               14   ENCL   13
 
0   ~
f 1
L e
        'I
  ~
7
 
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PO. Box 968 ~ Richland, Washington 99352-0968 April 24, 1998 GO2-98-063 Docket No. 50-397 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
WNP-2 OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
WNP-2 OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT SUBMITTALOF ADDITIONALINFORMATION


==References:==
==References:==
: 1)  Letter GO2-97-219 dated December 4, 1997, PR Bemis (Supply System) to NRC, "Request for Amendment, Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits"
: 2) Letter GO2-98-042 dated March 3, 1998, DW Coleman (Supply System) to NRC, "Request for Amendment, Submittal of Additional Information" I
: 3) Letter GO2-98-049 dated March 9, 1998, PR Bemis (Supply System) to NRC, "Request for Amendment of SLMCPR - Modification of Request"
: 4) Letter ABBWP-98-021 dated April 15, 1998, RM Matheny (ABB) to RA Vopalensky (Supply System), "Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14 SLMCPR Evaluation" (attached)
: 5) CENPD-300-P-A, Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel, July 1996 A request for an    amendment of the WNP-2 Technical Specifications to establish safety limits for Cycle 14 was submitted by the Supply System in December 1997 (Reference 1). Additional information describing the methodology used for safety limit calculations was transmitted by Reference 2. The Supply System's original amendment request was modified by Reference 3 to address issues identified by the NRC. This letter and its attachments contain information regarding the effect of channel bow and changing core design on the safety limits proposed for adoption in the amendment request.
Since the submittal of the original amendment request, the Cycle 14 reference core design has been modified to reflect the revised Cycle 13 energy production. The changes in the core design have been documented in the Cycle 14 Reload Design Report WNP2-FTS-148 dated January, 1998 (Attachment 1). The Cycle 14 reload will now be comprised of 132 ABB SVEA-96 new m c~
9804300263 980424 PDR    ADOCK      050003'P7 P                        PDR


1)Letter GO2-97-219 dated December 4, 1997, PR Bemis (Supply System)to NRC,"Request for Amendment, Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits" 2)Letter GO2-98-042 dated March 3, 1998, DW Coleman (Supply System)to NRC,"Request for Amendment, Submittal of Additional Information" I 3)Letter GO2-98-049 dated March 9, 1998, PR Bemis (Supply System)to NRC,"Request for Amendment of SLMCPR-Modification of Request" 4)Letter ABBWP-98-021 dated April 15, 1998, RM Matheny (ABB)to RA Vopalensky (Supply System),"Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14 SLMCPR Evaluation" (attached) 5)CENPD-300-P-A, Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel, July 1996 A request for an amendment of the WNP-2 Technical Specifications to establish safety limits for Cycle 14 was submitted by the Supply System in December 1997 (Reference 1).Additional information describing the methodology used for safety limit calculations was transmitted by Reference 2.The Supply System's original amendment request was modified by Reference 3 to address issues identified by the NRC.This letter and its attachments contain information regarding the effect of channel bow and changing core design on the safety limits proposed for adoption in the amendment request.Since the submittal of the original amendment request, the Cycle 14 reference core design has been modified to reflect the revised Cycle 13 energy production.
    ~l S   I
The changes in the core design have been documented in the Cycle 14 Reload Design Report WNP2-FTS-148 dated January, 1998 (Attachment 1).The Cycle 14 reload will now be comprised of 132 ABB SVEA-96 new m c~9804300263 980424 PDR ADOCK 050003'P7 P PDR
't
~l S I't REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT SUBMITTAL OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION Page 2 fuel assemblies, 216 irradiated ABB SVEA-96 assemblies, and 416 irradiated SPC ATRIUM-9X assemblies.
 
This information supersedes the original Cycle 14 core load projections reported in the original amendment request (see Attachment 1 of Reference 1).DifFerences in cycle length or fuel inventory between the reference core and the as-loaded core are evaluated in accordance with the methodology described in section 4.3 of Reference 5.The revisions to the Cycle 14 core design noted above have been evaluated by ABB and do not afFect the values of the safety limits proposed in the amendment request (Reference 4).To ensure sufficiently conservative operating limits for the Siemens ATRIUM-9X fuel in Cycle 14, the calculation of hCPR includes the application of a conservative adder as described in the Operating License condition imposed by Amendment 151.The Supply System currently anticipates using the interim safety limits for the ATRIUM-9X fuel for the duration of Cycle 14.The previous conclusion of no significant hazards that was evaluated in accordance with 10CFR50.92(c) and documented in Reference 1 is not changed by the information contained in this submittal.
REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT SUBMITTALOF ADDITIONALINFORMATION Page 2 fuel assemblies, 216 irradiated ABB SVEA-96 assemblies, and 416 irradiated SPC ATRIUM-9X assemblies. This information supersedes the original Cycle 14 core load projections reported in the original amendment request (see Attachment 1 of Reference 1).
The supplemental information provided by this letter has also been evaluated against the criteria for identification of licensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental assessment in accordance with 10CFR51.21.
DifFerences in cycle length or fuel inventory between the reference core and the as-loaded core are evaluated in accordance with the methodology described in section 4.3 of Reference 5. The revisions to the Cycle 14 core design noted above have been evaluated by ABB and do not afFect the values of the safety limits proposed in the amendment request (Reference 4).
The proposed changes still meet the criteria for categorical exclusion as described in 10CFR51.22(b) and 10CFR51.22(c)(9).
To ensure sufficiently conservative operating limits for the Siemens ATRIUM-9Xfuel in Cycle 14, the calculation of hCPR includes the application of a conservative adder as described in the Operating License condition imposed by Amendment 151.               The Supply System currently anticipates using the interim safety limits for the ATRIUM-9Xfuel for the duration of Cycle 14.
An environmental assessment of the proposed change is not required.Some of the information contained in Attachment 2 has been identified as proprietary to ABB Combustion Engineering.
The previous conclusion of no significant hazards that was evaluated in accordance with 10CFR50.92(c) and documented in Reference 1 is not changed by the information contained in this submittal. The supplemental information provided by this letter has also been evaluated against the criteria for identification of licensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental assessment in accordance with 10CFR51.21. The proposed changes still meet the criteria for categorical exclusion as described in 10CFR51.22(b) and 10CFR51.22(c)(9). An environmental assessment of the proposed change is not required.
In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790, an affidavit is enclosed to support the withholding of this information from public disclosure.
Some   of the information contained in Attachment 2 has been identified as proprietary to ABB Combustion Engineering. In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790, an affidavit is enclosed to support the withholding of this information from public disclosure.
Should you have any questions or desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact Mr.P.J.Inserra at (509)377-4147.Respectfully, D.W.Coleman (Mail Drop PE20)Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs Attachments:
Should you have any questions or desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact Mr. P.J. Inserra at (509) 377-4147.
1)WNP2-FTS-148, Cycle 14 Reload Design Report, January 1998 2)Letter ABBWP-98-021, dated April 16, 1998 CC: EW MerschofF-NRC RIV KE Perkins, Jr.-NRC RIV, WCFO C Poslusny, Jr.-NRR NRC Resident Inspector-927N T Huang-NRR JE Whittemore
Respectfully, D.W. Coleman (Mail Drop PE20)
-NRC RIV DL Williams-BPA PD Robinson-Winston 2 Strawn  
Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs Attachments:     1) WNP2-FTS-148, Cycle 14 Reload Design Report, January 1998
\t Q~7 J  
: 2) Letter ABBWP-98-021, dated April 16, 1998 CC:     EW MerschofF- NRC RIV                         T Huang - NRR KE Perkins, Jr. - NRC RIV, WCFO               JE Whittemore - NRC RIV C Poslusny, Jr. -NRR                         DL Williams - BPA NRC Resident Inspector - 927N                 PD Robinson - Winston 2 Strawn
~~AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON
 
)))
t
  \
Q   ~
7 J
 
~ ~
AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON )                              


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
Attachment to ABBWP-98-021,"Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14, SLMCPR Evaluation," dated April 15, 1998.I, D.W.Coleman, being duly sworn, subscribe to and say that I am the Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs, for the WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, the applicant herein;that I have the full authority to execute this oath;that I have reviewed the foregoing; and that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief the statements made in it are true.The attachment to this letter contains information
Attachment       to   ABBWP-98-021,
[marked in brackets]which is considered by ABB Combustion Engineering to be proprietary.
                                      )                          "Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14,
Attached is an affidavit executed by Mr.I.C.Rickard, Director, Nuclear Licensing, for Combustion Engineering, Inc., dated April 16, 1998, which provides the basis on which it is claimed that the subject document should be withheld from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790.The Washington Public Power Supply System treats the subject document as proprietary information on the basis of statements by its owner.In submitting this information to the NRC, the Supply System requests that the subject document be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790.DATE , 1998 D.W.Coleman, Acting Manager Regulatory Affairs On this date personally appeared before me D.W.COLEMAN, to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned.
                                      )                          SLMCPR Evaluation," dated April 15, 1998.
GIVEN under my hand and seal this~day of 1998.t'r, f F-otary Public in an for the STATE OF WASHINGTON Residing at My Commission Expires  
I, D.W. Coleman, being duly sworn, subscribe to and say that I am the Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs, for the WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, the applicant herein; that I have the full authority to execute this oath; that I have reviewed the foregoing; and that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief the statements made in it are true.
~~'I)I>>" sr~~''a1 ,''qQ A I r(Fp tg<P'll)i/~'
The attachment to this letter contains information [marked in brackets] which is considered by ABB Combustion Engineering to be proprietary.
AFFIDAVIT PURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.790 Combustion Engineering, Inc.State of Connecticut County of Hartford SS.: Windsor I, lan C.Rickard, depose and say that I am the Director, Nuclear Licensing, of Combustion Engineering, Inc., duly authorized to make this affidavit, and have reviewed or caused to have reviewed the information which is identified as proprietary and referenced in the paragraph immediately below.I am submitting this affidavit in conjunction with the application of Washington Public Power Supply System and in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations.
Attached is an affidavit executed by Mr. I.C. Rickard, Director, Nuclear Licensing, for Combustion Engineering, Inc., dated April 16, 1998, which provides the basis on which it is claimed that the subject document should be withheld from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790.
The information for which proprietary treatment is sought is contained in the following document: Attachment to ABBWP-98-021,"Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14 SLMCPR Evaluation", April 15, 1998.This document has been appropriately designated as proprietary.
The Washington Public Power Supply System treats the subject document as proprietary information on the basis of statements by its owner. In submitting this information to the NRC, the Supply System requests that the subject document be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790.
I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Combustion Engineering, Inc.in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
DATE                                     , 1998 D.W. Coleman, Acting Manager Regulatory Affairs On this date personally appeared before me D.W. COLEMAN, to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned.
Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b)(4)of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, included in the above referenced document, should be withheld.1.The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, which is owned and has been held in confidence by Combustion Engineering, Inc.It consists of information concerning analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio evaluation.
GIVEN under my hand and       seal this ~day of                                     1998.
g 2.The information consists of test data or other similar data concerning a process, method or component, the application of which results in substantial competitive advantage to Combustion Engineering, Inc.3.The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Combustion Engineering, Inc.and not customarily disclosed to the public.Combustion Engineering, Inc.has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence.
t'r, otary Public in an for the STATE OF WASHINGTON f
The details of the aforementioned system were provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission via letter DP-537 from F.M.Stern to Frank Schroeder dated December 2, 1974.This system was applied in determining that the subject document herein is proprietary.
F-                Residing at My Commission Expires
4.The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 with the understanding that it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
 
5.The information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is not available in public sources, and any disclosure to third parties has been made pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
                              ~ ~
6.Public disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Combustion Engineering, Inc.because: a.A similar product is manufactured and sold by major light water reactor competitors of Combustion Engineering, Inc.b.Development of this information by Combustion Engineering, Inc.required tens of thousands of manhours and hundreds of thousands of dollars.A competitor would have to undergo similar expense in generating equivalent information.
                        ' I )
c.In order to acquire such information, a competitor would also require considerable time and inconvenience to develop the analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio evaluation. d.The information consist of analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ev'aluation, the application of which provides a competitive economic advantage.
I>>" sr
The availability of such information to competitors would enable them to modify their product to better compete with Combustion Engineering, Inc., take marketing or other actions to improve their product's position or impair the position of Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s product, and avoid developing similar data and analyses in support of their processes, methods or apparatus.
      ~~' 'a1
e.In pricing Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s products and services, significant research, development, engineering, analytical, manufacturing, licensing, quality assurance and other costs and expenses must be included.The ability of Combustion Engineering's competitors to utilize such information without similar expenditure of resources may enable them to sell at prices reflecting significantly lower costs.f.Use of the information by competitors in the.international marketplace would increase their ability to market nuclear steam supply systems by reducing the costs associated with their technology development.
  ,''   qQ A
In addition, disclosure would have an adverse economic impact on Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s potential for obtaining or maintaining foreign licensees.
I r(
Further the deponent sayeth not.lan ard Director,.
Fp tg
Nuclear Licensing Sworn tPoefore m this J~dayof , 1998 Notary Public My commission expires: 9 Bl g  
            <P'll)i/ ~ '
~%~~}}
 
AFFIDAVITPURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.790 Combustion Engineering, Inc.
State of Connecticut County of Hartford                           SS.: Windsor I, lan C. Rickard, depose and say that I am the Director, Nuclear Licensing, of Combustion Engineering, Inc., duly authorized to make this affidavit, and have reviewed or caused to have reviewed the information which is identified as proprietary and referenced in the paragraph immediately below. I am submitting this affidavit in conjunction with the application of Washington Public Power Supply System and in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations.
The information for which proprietary treatment is sought is contained in the following document:
Attachment to ABBWP-98-021, "Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14 SLMCPR Evaluation", April 15, 1998.
This document has been appropriately designated as proprietary.
I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Combustion Engineering, Inc. in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.
Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, included in the above referenced document, should be withheld.
: 1. The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, which is owned and has been held in confidence by Combustion Engineering, Inc. It consists of information concerning analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio evaluation.
 
g
: 2. The information consists of test data or other similar data concerning a process, method or component, the application of which results in substantial competitive advantage to Combustion Engineering, Inc.
: 3. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Combustion Engineering, Inc. and not customarily disclosed to the public. Combustion Engineering, Inc. has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The details of the aforementioned system were provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission via letter DP-537 from F. M. Stern to Frank Schroeder dated December 2, 1974. This system was applied in determining that the subject document herein is proprietary.
: 4. The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 with the understanding that it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
: 5. The information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is not available in public sources, and any disclosure to third parties has been made pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
: 6. Public disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Combustion Engineering, Inc. because:
: a. A similar product is manufactured and sold by major light water reactor competitors of Combustion Engineering, Inc.
: b. Development of this information by Combustion Engineering, Inc. required tens of thousands of manhours and hundreds of thousands of dollars. A competitor would have to undergo similar expense in generating equivalent information.
: c. In order to acquire such information, a competitor would also require considerable time and inconvenience to develop the analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio evaluation.
: d. The information consist of analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ev'aluation, the application of which provides a competitive economic advantage. The availability of such information to competitors would enable them to modify their product to better compete with Combustion Engineering, Inc., take marketing or other actions to improve their product's position or impair the position of Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s product, and avoid developing similar data and analyses in support of their processes, methods or apparatus.
: e. In pricing Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s products and services, significant research, development, engineering, analytical, manufacturing, licensing, quality assurance and other costs and expenses must be included. The ability of Combustion Engineering's competitors to utilize such information without similar expenditure of resources may enable them to sell at prices reflecting significantly lower costs.
: f. Use of the information by competitors in the. international marketplace would increase their ability to market nuclear steam supply systems by reducing the costs associated with their technology development. In addition, disclosure would have an adverse economic impact on Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s potential for obtaining or maintaining foreign licensees.
Further the deponent sayeth not.
lan         ard Director,. Nuclear Licensing Sworn tPoefore m this J~ dayof                   , 1998 Notary Public My commission expires:     9 Bl g
 
~ % ~ ~}}

Latest revision as of 13:00, 29 October 2019

Submits Proprietary & non-proprietary Info Re Request for Amend to TS to Establish Safety Limits for Cycle 14.Encls Contain Info Re Effects of Channel Bow & Changing Core Design on Safety Limits.Proprietary Info Withheld
ML17292B357
Person / Time
Site: Columbia Energy Northwest icon.png
Issue date: 04/24/1998
From: Coleman D
WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML17292B358 List:
References
GO2-98-063, GO2-98-63, NUDOCS 9804300263
Download: ML17292B357 (13)


Text

CATEGORY REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTI SYSTEM (RXDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9804300263

~ DOC.DATE: 98/04/24 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET ¹ FACIL:50-397 WPPSS Nuclear Project, Unit 2, Washington Public Powe 05000397 AUTH. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION COLEMAN,D.W. ~ Washington Public Power Supply System RECXP.NAME

~ RECIPIENT AFFILIATION Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Submits proprietary & non-proprietary info re request for amend to TS to establish safety limits for Cycle 14.Encls contain info re effects of channel bow & changing core design on safety limits. Proprietary info withheld.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: A001D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: OR Submittal: General Distribution E

NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD4-2 LA 1 1 PD4-2 PD 1 1 POSLUSNY,C 1 1 INTERNAL: ACRS 1 1 FXLE CENTE 01 1 1 NRR/DE/ECGB/A 1 1 NRR DE CB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HICB 1 '

1 NRR/DSSA/SPLB 1 1 NRR/DSSA/SRZB 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 OGC/HDS3 1 0 TERNAL: NOAC NRC PDR 1 1 D

U E

NOTE TO ALL "RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE. TO HAVE YOUR NAME OR ORGANIZATION REMOVED FROM DISTRIBUTION LISTS e OR REDUCE THE NUMBER OF COPIES RECEIVED BY YOU OR YOUR ORGANIZATION, CONTACT THE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK (DCD) ON EXTENSION 415-2083 TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 14 ENCL 13

0 ~

f 1

L e

'I

~

7

WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM PO. Box 968 ~ Richland, Washington 99352-0968 April 24, 1998 GO2-98-063 Docket No. 50-397 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555 Gentlemen:

Subject:

WNP-2 OPERATING LICENSE NPF-21 REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT SUBMITTALOF ADDITIONALINFORMATION

References:

1) Letter GO2-97-219 dated December 4, 1997, PR Bemis (Supply System) to NRC, "Request for Amendment, Minimum Critical Power Ratio Safety Limits"
2) Letter GO2-98-042 dated March 3, 1998, DW Coleman (Supply System) to NRC, "Request for Amendment, Submittal of Additional Information" I
3) Letter GO2-98-049 dated March 9, 1998, PR Bemis (Supply System) to NRC, "Request for Amendment of SLMCPR - Modification of Request"
4) Letter ABBWP-98-021 dated April 15, 1998, RM Matheny (ABB) to RA Vopalensky (Supply System), "Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14 SLMCPR Evaluation" (attached)
5) CENPD-300-P-A, Reference Safety Report for Boiling Water Reactor Reload Fuel, July 1996 A request for an amendment of the WNP-2 Technical Specifications to establish safety limits for Cycle 14 was submitted by the Supply System in December 1997 (Reference 1). Additional information describing the methodology used for safety limit calculations was transmitted by Reference 2. The Supply System's original amendment request was modified by Reference 3 to address issues identified by the NRC. This letter and its attachments contain information regarding the effect of channel bow and changing core design on the safety limits proposed for adoption in the amendment request.

Since the submittal of the original amendment request, the Cycle 14 reference core design has been modified to reflect the revised Cycle 13 energy production. The changes in the core design have been documented in the Cycle 14 Reload Design Report WNP2-FTS-148 dated January, 1998 (Attachment 1). The Cycle 14 reload will now be comprised of 132 ABB SVEA-96 new m c~

9804300263 980424 PDR ADOCK 050003'P7 P PDR

~l S I

't

REQUEST FOR AMENDMENT SUBMITTALOF ADDITIONALINFORMATION Page 2 fuel assemblies, 216 irradiated ABB SVEA-96 assemblies, and 416 irradiated SPC ATRIUM-9X assemblies. This information supersedes the original Cycle 14 core load projections reported in the original amendment request (see Attachment 1 of Reference 1).

DifFerences in cycle length or fuel inventory between the reference core and the as-loaded core are evaluated in accordance with the methodology described in section 4.3 of Reference 5. The revisions to the Cycle 14 core design noted above have been evaluated by ABB and do not afFect the values of the safety limits proposed in the amendment request (Reference 4).

To ensure sufficiently conservative operating limits for the Siemens ATRIUM-9Xfuel in Cycle 14, the calculation of hCPR includes the application of a conservative adder as described in the Operating License condition imposed by Amendment 151. The Supply System currently anticipates using the interim safety limits for the ATRIUM-9Xfuel for the duration of Cycle 14.

The previous conclusion of no significant hazards that was evaluated in accordance with 10CFR50.92(c) and documented in Reference 1 is not changed by the information contained in this submittal. The supplemental information provided by this letter has also been evaluated against the criteria for identification of licensing and regulatory actions requiring environmental assessment in accordance with 10CFR51.21. The proposed changes still meet the criteria for categorical exclusion as described in 10CFR51.22(b) and 10CFR51.22(c)(9). An environmental assessment of the proposed change is not required.

Some of the information contained in Attachment 2 has been identified as proprietary to ABB Combustion Engineering. In accordance with the requirements of 10 CFR 2.790, an affidavit is enclosed to support the withholding of this information from public disclosure.

Should you have any questions or desire additional information regarding this matter, please contact Mr. P.J. Inserra at (509) 377-4147.

Respectfully, D.W. Coleman (Mail Drop PE20)

Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs Attachments: 1) WNP2-FTS-148, Cycle 14 Reload Design Report, January 1998

2) Letter ABBWP-98-021, dated April 16, 1998 CC: EW MerschofF- NRC RIV T Huang - NRR KE Perkins, Jr. - NRC RIV, WCFO JE Whittemore - NRC RIV C Poslusny, Jr. -NRR DL Williams - BPA NRC Resident Inspector - 927N PD Robinson - Winston 2 Strawn

t

\

Q ~

7 J

~ ~

AFFIDAVIT STATE OF WASHINGTON )

Subject:

Attachment to ABBWP-98-021,

) "Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14,

) SLMCPR Evaluation," dated April 15, 1998.

I, D.W. Coleman, being duly sworn, subscribe to and say that I am the Acting Manager, Regulatory Affairs, for the WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM, the applicant herein; that I have the full authority to execute this oath; that I have reviewed the foregoing; and that to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief the statements made in it are true.

The attachment to this letter contains information [marked in brackets] which is considered by ABB Combustion Engineering to be proprietary.

Attached is an affidavit executed by Mr. I.C. Rickard, Director, Nuclear Licensing, for Combustion Engineering, Inc., dated April 16, 1998, which provides the basis on which it is claimed that the subject document should be withheld from public disclosure under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790.

The Washington Public Power Supply System treats the subject document as proprietary information on the basis of statements by its owner. In submitting this information to the NRC, the Supply System requests that the subject document be withheld from public disclosure in accordance with 10 CFR 2.790.

DATE , 1998 D.W. Coleman, Acting Manager Regulatory Affairs On this date personally appeared before me D.W. COLEMAN, to me known to be the individual who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged that he signed the same as his free act and deed for the uses and purposes herein mentioned.

GIVEN under my hand and seal this ~day of 1998.

t'r, otary Public in an for the STATE OF WASHINGTON f

F- Residing at My Commission Expires

~ ~

' I )

I>>" sr

~~' 'a1

, qQ A

I r(

Fp tg

<P'll)i/ ~ '

AFFIDAVITPURSUANT TO 10 CFR 2.790 Combustion Engineering, Inc.

State of Connecticut County of Hartford SS.: Windsor I, lan C. Rickard, depose and say that I am the Director, Nuclear Licensing, of Combustion Engineering, Inc., duly authorized to make this affidavit, and have reviewed or caused to have reviewed the information which is identified as proprietary and referenced in the paragraph immediately below. I am submitting this affidavit in conjunction with the application of Washington Public Power Supply System and in conformance with the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 of the Commission's regulations.

The information for which proprietary treatment is sought is contained in the following document:

Attachment to ABBWP-98-021, "Clarification of WNP-2 Cycle 14 SLMCPR Evaluation", April 15, 1998.

This document has been appropriately designated as proprietary.

I have personal knowledge of the criteria and procedures utilized by Combustion Engineering, Inc. in designating information as a trade secret, privileged or as confidential commercial or financial information.

Pursuant to the provisions of paragraph (b) (4) of Section 2.790 of the Commission's regulations, the following is furnished for consideration by the Commission in determining whether the information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, included in the above referenced document, should be withheld.

1. The information sought to be withheld from public disclosure, which is owned and has been held in confidence by Combustion Engineering, Inc. It consists of information concerning analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio evaluation.

g

2. The information consists of test data or other similar data concerning a process, method or component, the application of which results in substantial competitive advantage to Combustion Engineering, Inc.
3. The information is of a type customarily held in confidence by Combustion Engineering, Inc. and not customarily disclosed to the public. Combustion Engineering, Inc. has a rational basis for determining the types of information customarily held in confidence by it and, in that connection, utilizes a system to determine when and whether to hold certain types of information in confidence. The details of the aforementioned system were provided to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission via letter DP-537 from F. M. Stern to Frank Schroeder dated December 2, 1974. This system was applied in determining that the subject document herein is proprietary.
4. The information is being transmitted to the Commission in confidence under the provisions of 10 CFR 2.790 with the understanding that it is to be received in confidence by the Commission.
5. The information, to the best of my knowledge and belief, is not available in public sources, and any disclosure to third parties has been made pursuant to regulatory provisions or proprietary agreements which provide for maintenance of the information in confidence.
6. Public disclosure of the information is likely to cause substantial harm to the competitive position of Combustion Engineering, Inc. because:
a. A similar product is manufactured and sold by major light water reactor competitors of Combustion Engineering, Inc.
b. Development of this information by Combustion Engineering, Inc. required tens of thousands of manhours and hundreds of thousands of dollars. A competitor would have to undergo similar expense in generating equivalent information.
c. In order to acquire such information, a competitor would also require considerable time and inconvenience to develop the analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio evaluation.
d. The information consist of analysis methodology details and calculation details for the Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio ev'aluation, the application of which provides a competitive economic advantage. The availability of such information to competitors would enable them to modify their product to better compete with Combustion Engineering, Inc., take marketing or other actions to improve their product's position or impair the position of Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s product, and avoid developing similar data and analyses in support of their processes, methods or apparatus.
e. In pricing Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s products and services, significant research, development, engineering, analytical, manufacturing, licensing, quality assurance and other costs and expenses must be included. The ability of Combustion Engineering's competitors to utilize such information without similar expenditure of resources may enable them to sell at prices reflecting significantly lower costs.
f. Use of the information by competitors in the. international marketplace would increase their ability to market nuclear steam supply systems by reducing the costs associated with their technology development. In addition, disclosure would have an adverse economic impact on Combustion Engineering, Inc.'s potential for obtaining or maintaining foreign licensees.

Further the deponent sayeth not.

lan ard Director,. Nuclear Licensing Sworn tPoefore m this J~ dayof , 1998 Notary Public My commission expires: 9 Bl g

~ % ~ ~