ML19142A053: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 16: Line 16:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-20r Examination Outline Quality Ghecklist Form ES-201-2 Re-Created Checklist  
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-20r                                   Examination Outline Quality Ghecklist                                       Form ES-201-2 Re-Created Checklist             -       inal Lost Facility: Quad Cities Units   1 and 2                                                     Date of Examination: July 2018 lnitials Item                                                  Task Description a       b*     c**
-inal Lost Facility:
: a. Verify that the outline(s) ft(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.           &L /N/A          v_
Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination:
W      b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with                           N/A R
July 2018 lnitials a b*c**Item Task Description
T I
&L/N/A v_a. Verify that the outline(s) ft(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N.b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.*a N/A'z-CUP c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.N/A rl-z Crnt N/A W_W R I T T E N d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate W/øt0-¿N/A a, Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all sampled.
(/ø'rl-Ib. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.N/A gl-I N/A&I M U L A T o R 2 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap).c.a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.(2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).(4) The number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on üre form.(5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.Ort 2 N/A W-I N/A w b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
l(A categories are appropriately
,ú, 3.W A L K T H R o U G H c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.N/A lL ry N/A_a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplins is appropriate.
                                                                                                                        *a               'z-T E
tuttb N/Ac. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.N/A ry N/A tu d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.tvlvøN/A p e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.ru 4.G E N E R A L N/A f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).a. Author b. Facility Reviewer (*)c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)d. NRC Supervisor G. Roach/J Printed ur Reeser Orlikowski D R* Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.}}
: c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.                   CUP      N/A   rl-z N
: d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate           Crnt      N/A   W_
2      a,   Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of
                                                                                                                              /  N/A
 
normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
( øt0-¿            W M
I
: b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number
                                                                                                                            /    N/A U            and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation L            schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested A            using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated           ø'rl-T o
R from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.                                                                                                     I To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and
                                                                                                                                        &
: c.                                                                                                                  N/A quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in                   gl-Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap).                                                                                                 I
: 3.     a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:                       N/A (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W                  distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.                                 Ort            W-A            (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the L
K          (3) form.
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).                                         2 T          (4) The number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on üre form.
H            (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area R                  tasks meets the criteria on the form.
I o
U G
H
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
(3)   No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
N/A w
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
                                                                                                                        ,ú,      N/A lL 4.
G
: a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.                   ry      N/A
_
E      b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplins is appropriate.                             tuttb   N/A N
: c. Ensure that l(A importance       ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.               N/A E
R A
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.                       ry tvlvø N/A     tu p
L      e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                                   N/A
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).                                             N/A    ru Printed
: a. Author                             G. Roach/J              ur
: b. Facility Reviewer (*)
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)             D  Reeser
: d. NRC Supervisor                     R Orlikowski
* Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.}}

Revision as of 19:37, 19 October 2019

2018 Quad Cities Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Outline Quality Checklist ES-201-2
ML19142A053
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/21/2019
From: David Reeser
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Exelon Generation Co
Reeser D
Shared Package
ML17165A503 List:
References
Download: ML19142A053 (1)
v • d • e


Text

ES-20r Examination Outline Quality Ghecklist Form ES-201-2 Re-Created Checklist - inal Lost Facility: Quad Cities Units 1 and 2 Date of Examination: July 2018 lnitials Item Task Description a b* c**

a. Verify that the outline(s) ft(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N. &L /N/A v_

W b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with N/A R

T I

Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all sampled.

l(A categories are appropriately

  • a 'z-T E
c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. CUP N/A rl-z N
d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(/A statements are appropriate Crnt N/A W_

2 a, Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of

/ N/A

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.

( øt0-¿ W M

I

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number

/ N/A U and mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation L schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested A using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated ø'rl-T o

R from the applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. I To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and

&

c. N/A quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in gl-Section D.5, "Specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap). I
3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: N/A (1) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks W distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form. Ort W-A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the L

K (3) form.

No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). 2 T (4) The number of new or modified tasks meeb or exceeds the minimums specified on üre form.

H (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area R tasks meets the criteria on the form.

I o

U G

H

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.

(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

N/A w

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

,ú, N/A lL 4.

G

a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. ry N/A

_

E b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 samplins is appropriate. tuttb N/A N

c. Ensure that l(A importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. N/A E

R A

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. ry tvlvø N/A tu p

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. N/A

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). N/A ru Printed
a. Author G. Roach/J ur
b. Facility Reviewer (*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) D Reeser
d. NRC Supervisor R Orlikowski
  • Not applicable for NRO-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML19142A053&oldid=1908899"